Clinical factors predicting successful electrophysiologic-pharmacologic study in patients with ventricular tachycardia

Animal models of ventricular arrhythmias

Limitations in understanding of arrhythmias stem from lack of animal models which serve as surrogates for man. The purpose of this review is to discuss iatrogenic and naturally occurring animal models that are useful in our understanding of the mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmia and of antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic agents. It is not surprising however that some information obtained from studies on infrahuman mammals may not be extrapolated to man. Need for anesthesia affects profoundly the electrophysiology of the heart, including autonomic affects. Most of the animal are modification of the Harris' 2-stage model. A model proposed by Schwartz, Billman and Stone has evolved as one that produces arguably the most information on the pathophysiology of arrhythmia production, including the role of the autonomic nervous system and the interaction with pharmacological agents. Intoxication with digitalis and escalating doses of epinephrine are commonly used models for production of ventricular arrhythmias. No matter what model of ventricular arrhythmias is used, programmed electrical stimulation can be useful to uncover increased tendency for arrhythmia, even if no arrhythmia occurs spontaneously. Models of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia occur in German shepherd puppies, Boxer dogs, Doberman pinchers with dilated cardiomyopathy, and in large dogs with gastric dilatation or splenic torsion. Models are necessary because they allow for controlled studies and methods of exploration impossible, for legal and ethical reasons, in humans. Nonetheless, ethical considerations in using animal models are still important, and there is a continual search for non-animal models to explore ventricular arrhythmias.

Infarct related artery patency: relation to serial electropharmacological studies and outcome in patients with previous myocardial infarction and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Evidence suggests that infarct related artery (IRA) patency may improve survival after acute myocardial infarction, which is thought to be partially due to a lower incidence of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, little is known about the effect of IRA patency on antiarrhythmic drug response and long-term outcome in patients with previous infarction who already experienced sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. A total of 152 patients with remote myocardial infarction and documented ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) underwent coronary angiography and programmed ventricular stimulation before and after oral administration of d,l-sotalol (240-640 mg/day). D,l-sotalol suppressed inducibility of VT/VF in 37 (25.2%) patients. The IRA was patent in 38.1% of all patients. There was no significant difference in the frequency of drug response between patients with patent or occluded IRAs (26.8% vs 24.2%, P = 0.87). In patients with a patent IRA, d,l-sotalol tended to be more effective in the absence of a left ventricular aneurysm, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.38). Ejection fraction and collateral blood flow had no effect on drug response in the presence or absence of IRA patency. During follow-up (13.0 +/- 19.9 months) of 29 patients discharged on oral d,l-sotalol, 3 patients experienced symptomatic VT and 4 sudden death. Arrhythmia recurrence and death of all cause (n = 6) and cardiac death (n = 4) were independent of IRA patency status. IRA patency had no effect on short-term drug response to d,l-sotalol in patients with remote myocardial infarction and documented VT/VF. Long-term outcome of patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias is independent of IRA patency status. In contrast to a previous report, outcome of electropharmacological testing was not predicted by the patency of the IRA.

Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia

The approach to patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) depends on the presence and type of structural heart disease. In patients with underlying heart disease and ventricular fibrillation or sustained symptomatic VT with hemodynamic compromise, the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs for the improvement of overall survival. These patients should receive an ICD unless contraindications are present. For patients with sustained VT and a structurally normal heart (idiopathic VT), radiofrequency catheter ablation is a reasonable option. If patients are symptomatic, nonsustained VT should be treated with beta-adrenergic blocking agents or antiarrhythmic drugs, which should be selected on the basis of the underlying cardiovascular substrate. In patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained VT, we recommend the use of programmed electrical stimulation for additional risk stratification. If a sustained ventricular arrhythmia is induced, an ICD should be implanted.

General principles of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias is a significant cause of mortality in patients with structural heart disease. Over the past several decades, the introduction of new pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy has expanded the treatment options available. This article will focus on the use of antiarrhythmic medication for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias and will review the following: (1) treatment goals for various clinical populations, (2) the mechanisms of antiarrhythmic and proarrhythmic actions of antiarrhythmic medications, and (3) empiric versus guided pharmacologic therapy.

Comparison of class Ia/Ib versus class III antiarrhythmic drugs for the suppression of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease

Previous studies suggest that class Ia drugs are ineffective in suppression of sustained ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation. More favorable results have been described with combinations of Ia and Ib drugs and also with class III antiarrhythmic drugs, but there have been no direct comparisons between these 2 regimens. The present study was undertaken to compare the electrophysiologic efficacy and predictors of success of these 2 regimens in patients with ischemic heart disease and inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. The population consisted of 136 patients with documented coronary artery disease. All had sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible during baseline electrophysiologic study and following intravenous procainamide. Follow-up studies were performed with a combination of oral class Ia and Ib or class III antiarrhythmic drugs. A positive response was the inability to induce a sustained ventricular arrhythmia with up to 3 extrastimuli at 2 right ventricular pacing sites. Response rates were 13% for Ia/Ib combination and 19% for class III agents (p = 0.40). Congestive heart failure differentially affected response rates. Only 8% of those responding to Ia/Ib therapy had heart failure compared with 59% of responders to class III (p <0.01). Multivariate analysis identified heart failure (RR 12.2, p = 0.03) as the only parameter with independent predictive value of response to Ia/Ib therapy. These results indicate that congestive heart failure is a potent predictor of a negative response to a combination of class Ia and Ib antiarrhythmic drugs. In this population, class III drugs or nonpharmacologic therapy should be considered as initial treatment.

Evaluation and Management of Sudden Death Survivors

Only 20% of patients survive a cardiac arrest. Up to 80% of patients have a cardiac arrest secondary to a ventricular tachyarrhythmia. In the adult population, over 70% of the above patients have obstructive coronary artery disease; thus, coronary arteriography should be performed in all survivors of cardiac arrest. Once reversible causes have been treated, antiarrhythmic therapy is usually guided by Holter monitoring, electrophysiologic testing or both. Due to high recurrence rates on antiarrhythmic drugs, many patients are now treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Although these devices appear to improve sudden death survival, long-term overall survival may not be superior to “best drug therapy.” This hypothesis is currently being tested in two prospective randomized, multicenter trials.

Malignant sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in women: characteristics and outcome of treatment with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Clinical rhythm, heart disease, ejection fraction, defibrillation threshold, recurrent arrhythmias, and mortality were compared in 268 consecutive recipients (213 men and 55 women) of their first implantable cardioverter defibrillator for life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Women were younger than men, less likely to have structural heart disease, and more likely to have clinical ventricular fibrillation, a higher ejection fraction, and a lower defibrillation threshold. Complications of defibrillator placement were similar in both sexes. Unadjusted survival tended to be higher in women than in men (97% vs 90%, respectively, at 2 years, P = 0.08), largely due to fewer deaths from noncardiac causes or cardiac causes other than arrhythmia (P = 0.04). Women also tended to be at lower, albeit still substantial, risk for recurrent arrhythmias during follow-up (37% vs 52% in men at 2 years, P = 0.11). After adjustment for baseline differences, overall survival, arrhythmia death-free survival, nonarrhythmia death-free survival, and frequency of recurrent arrhythmias were not found to be gender related. Despite their apparent "lower risk" status on initial presentation, women remained at substantial risk for recurrent arrhythmias. This underscores the need to avoid being unduly biased by the "appearance" of health in managing women with malignant arrhythmias. That survival and other clinical endpoints were all ultimately independent of gender emphasizes the importance of other clinical variables in assessing risk from ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Are there gender differences in patients with coronary artery disease presenting with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation?

The incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) is greater in men than in women. The aim of the study was to analyze whether any gender-related differences in patients with CAD and documented spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias exist, and which parameters influence the induction of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The data of 250 patients [43 women (17.2%) and 207 men (82.8%)] with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia [n = 190 (76%)] and fibrillation [n = 60 (24%)] who underwent coronary and left ventricular angiography, electrophysiological study, and signal-averaging electrocardiogram (ECG) form the basis of this analysis. No gender-related differences could be observed in age, number of diseased coronary arteries, history, location and number of myocardial infarctions, presence of left ventricular aneurysm, ejection fraction, type of spontaneous or induced arrhythmias, right ventricular effective refractory period, and signal-averaged ECG parameters. Age, presence of previous myocardial infarction, and ejection fraction were significant predictors (p < 0.001) of inducibility of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Once CAD has begun, female and male patients present similar clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics. Thus, both genders should benefit similarly from diagnostic and therapeutic approaches if they are referred to the hospital or to invasive interventions at similar intervals in the course of their illness.

Electrophysiologic effects of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the prediction of successful suppression of induced ventricular tachycardia

Predictors of a successful outcome of serial electrophysiologic (EP) and drug studies have been identified from among baseline patient characteristics but not from among measures of baseline and drug-related EP effects. Identifying such predictors would be useful in explaining the mechanism of successful drug therapy and in guiding drug development and selection. We prospectively studied EP characteristics in 159 trials in 62 patients with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation during antiarrhythmic therapy and compared EP measures between successful (n = 30) and failed trials (n = 129). The average age of the patients was 64 years (range 27 to 78 years); 82% were men and 18% women; and 87% had coronary artery disease. Measurements included R-R, QRS, and QT intervals during intrinsic rhythm and during pacing at cycle lengths of 600 of 400 msec; ventricular effective refractory periods (ERP) during pacing at cycle lengths of 600 and 400 msec; and changes in these measures, comparing treatment with drug-free baseline. Univariate predictors of success (in order of significance) included ERP600/QRS600, sotalol versus other drugs, ERP400/QRS400, delta ERP600, delta R-R, ERP600, QRS400 (negative association), delta ERP400, QRS600 (negative association), ERP400 (all p < 0.1). In two separate multivariate models, one for each drive cycle length, only the ratio ERP600/QRS600 (p = 0.01) in the first model and ERP400/QRS400 (p = 0.01) in the second model were significantly and independently associated with achieving noninducibility with drug therapy. Therefore measures of greater refractoriness and lesser delays in conduction velocity (ie, greater "wavelength") relate to drug success.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why is catheter ablation less successful than surgery for treating ventricular tachycardia that results from coronary artery disease?

Nearly 80% of patients with coronary artery disease who have map-directed surgery for control of ventricular tachycardias require no drug therapy to prevent recurrences, while fewer than 50% of patients undergoing catheter ablation have similar outcomes. Catheter ablation will fail if arrhythmogenic sites are incompletely ablated by lesions that are too small or too far away from the reentrant pathway or if all arrhythmogenic sites are not identified. The underlying assumptions used to guide site selection are that: (a) ventricular tachycardias arise from reentrant mechanisms; (b) monomorphic ventricular tachycardias with similar QRS morphologies arise from the same pathway; (c) the ventricular tachycardia initiated during the procedure represents the patient's spontaneous arrhythmia; (d) the endocardial site that should be ablated can be identified from cardiac activation maps produced during induced ventricular tachycardia or from ancillary techniques; and (e) the patient has only one or two reentrant pathways. Relying on incorrect assumptions may account for the difference in success rates. Patients may have similar appearing ventricular tachycardias that arise from different pathways, and the entire thin layer of viable tissue between the infarct and the endocardium may contain many reentrant pathways. Some ventricular tachycardias may arise from the myocardium away from the endocardium, while others may arise from the epicardium. Small lesions may not be large enough to eliminate all possible reentrant pathways. Catheter ablation may be less successful because the lesions are inadequate, the assumptions guiding the selection of arrhythmogenic tissue are incorrect, or all arrhythmogenic sites are not identified. The primary reason catheter ablation is less successful than surgery in the treatment of ventricular tachycardias is that catheter ablation does not ablate as much tissue as is removed by surgery. The success rate of catheter ablation probably can be improved if the amount of tissue ablated is increased.

Serial electropharmacologic studies in patients with ischemic heart disease and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: when is drug testing sufficient?

Serial testing of antiarrhythmic drugs by programmed electrical stimulation can be costly in time, expense and risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of serial electropharmacologic tests for similarities that might obviate the need for protracted drug testing. Serial electropharmacologic testing was performed in 283 patients with coronary artery disease and clinical sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). Drug tests were defined as concordant if sustained VT or VF could be consistently induced, or failed to be consistently induced during all such trials in a given patient. The following drugs were included for testing: procainamide, quinidine and disopyramide (class IA); phenytoin, mexiletine and tocainide (class IB); and flecainide and encainide (class IC). All patients were serially tested with > or = 2 (mean and median, 3) antiarrhythmic agents regardless of results from drug-free testing or initial acute drug testing. Overall, the results of serial drug trials directed by programmed stimulation were concordant in more than two thirds of patients. Concordance was comparably high whether patients were serially tested with drugs within the same antiarrhythmic class, or with drugs from differing classes, and was not related to patients' clinical or electrophysiologic characteristics. Protracted serial electropharmacologic testing does not appear necessary for predicting successful or unsuccessful antiarrhythmic drug therapy in survivors of clinical VT or VF. Single drug testing can identify most patients whose arrhythmia will or will not respond to medications.

Multiple monomorphic ventricular tachycardia configurations predict failure of antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by electrophysiologic study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the induction at electrophysiologic study of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias with multiple QRS complex configurations predicted failure of subsequent serial electrophysiologic study guided antiarrhythmic drug testing.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardias with multiple QRS complex configurations are associated with failure of surgical therapy for ventricular tachycardia. As such, the presence of multiple monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardias during electrophysiologic testing may predict failure of subsequent medical therapy.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with coronary artery disease had reproducible induction of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia during a baseline electrophysiologic study. Each patient then underwent a mean of 1.5 antiarrhythmic drug trials. An antiarrhythmic drug regimen that suppressed induction of ventricular tachycardia was identified in 13 (26%) of the 51 patients.

RESULTS

Patients with only one inducible monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardia at baseline study were more likely to have an antiarrhythmic drug regimen identified that suppressed inducible ventricular tachycardia than were patients with multiple monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardias (12[36%] of 33 patients vs. 1 [6%] of 18, p = 0.04). In seven patients with only one induced configuration of ventricular tachycardia, a second monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with a different QRS complex configuration occurred during attempts at pacing termination of the induced ventricular tachycardia. None of these seven patients then had successful drug suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia. Thus, 12 (46%) of 26 patients with a single monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardia observed at baseline study had successful serial drug testing compared with 1 (4%) of 25 patients with multiple QRS complex ventricular tachycardia configurations (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The induction or observation of multiple monomorphic QRS complex ventricular tachycardias at baseline electrophysiologic study predicted failure of subsequent serial electrophysiologic study--guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

A comparison of electrophysiologic testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators

BACKGROUND

Invasive electrophysiologic study and noninvasive Holter monitoring (in conjunction with exercise testing) have both been used to evaluate the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and in survivors of cardiac arrest. We directly compared these two approaches to the prediction of drug efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 486 patients who had documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias that were inducible during electrophysiologic study and 10 or more premature ventricular complexes per hour during Holter monitoring were randomly assigned to undergo serial testing of antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy by electrophysiologic study or Holter monitoring. The patients received up to six drugs in random order until one was predicted to be effective either in suppressing inducible arrhythmia (in the electrophysiologic-study group) or in suppressing premature ventricular complexes (in the Holter-monitoring group). The patients were then followed for recurrences of arrhythmia or death.

RESULTS

In the electrophysiologic-study group, 108 of 242 patients (45 percent) received a prediction of efficacy, as compared with 188 of 244 patients (77 percent) in the Holter-monitoring group (P < 0.001). Over a six-year follow-up period, there were 150 recurrences of arrhythmia and 46 deaths among the 296 patients receiving drugs predicted to be effective. Thirty-four of the deaths were from arrhythmic causes, and eight were from cardiac causes. There was no significant difference between the two study groups in the actuarial probabilities of these events. The risk of a recurrence of arrhythmia was significantly lower in patients who received sotalol than in those who received other antiarrhythmic drugs, and the risk was lower in those who had not previously failed to respond to antiarrhythmic drugs than in those who had.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Holter monitoring led to predictions of antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy more often than did electrophysiologic study in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, there was no significant difference in the success of drug therapy as selected by the two methods.

Infarct artery patency predicts outcome of serial electropharmacological studies in patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Surviving myocardial cells near the infarct border zone form the arrhythmogenic substrate for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in humans. Infarct-related artery (IRA) patency may modulate the electrophysiological function of this arrhythmogenic substrate and its response to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. We postulated that effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy selected during serial electrophysiological studies in patients with VT after a myocardial infarction would be identified more frequently when the IRA is patent than when chronically occluded.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n = 64) with documented coronary artery disease and remote myocardial infarction presenting with spontaneous sustained VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were studied. These patients underwent 4 +/- 2 electropharmacological studies identifying effective antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 16 (25%) patients. Drug responders did not differ significantly from nonresponders in demographic, electrocardiographic, angiographic, or hemodynamic measurements. A patent IRA was associated with antiarrhythmic drug response significantly more frequently than was an occluded IRA (45% versus 9%, p = 0.001). Patency of the IRA was the only independent predictor of response to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in this study population. The sensitivity and specificity of using a patent IRA to predict successful drug testing were 81% and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of electropharmacological studies was predicted by the patency of the IRA. A patent IRA was associated with a greater probability of finding effective drug therapy.

Determinants of predicted efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring trial. The ESVEM Investigators

BACKGROUND

The Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) study was designed to compare the accuracy of predictions of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy made by electrophysiological study (EPS) with those made by Holter monitoring (HM) combined with exercise testing. The present study describes the baseline characteristics and the response to drug efficacy tests of 486 randomized subjects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias were randomly assigned to undergo serial testing of up to six antiarrhythmic drugs by either EPS (EPS limb) or HM and exercise testing (HM limb). Efficacy predictions were achieved in 108 of 242 patients in the EPS limb (45%) and in 188 of 244 patients (77%) in the HM limb. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 0.25 and presence of coronary artery disease were negative correlates (p < 0.10) of drug efficacy predictions in the EPS limb. In the HM limb, LVEF was the lone univariate correlate of efficacy, although it was only marginally significant (p = 0.107). A multivariate model selected assessment by HM and higher LVEF as independent predictors (p < 0.05) of drug efficacy. The drug evaluation process required an actuarial median time of 25 days in the EPS limb and 10 days in the HM limb (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

1) Drug efficacy predictions are achieved more frequently by HM than by EPS. 2) Assessment by HM and severity of left ventricular dysfunction are independent correlates for a drug efficacy prediction. 3) The duration of drug testing is considerably shorter for the HM method.

Prognosis after syncope: impact of left ventricular function

A cardiac cause of syncope has been associated with increased sudden death risk, whereas unexplained syncope has a benign prognosis. However, in patients who have depressed left ventricular function, the accuracy of diagnostic tests and the efficacy of therapy, such as antiarrhythmic drugs, are reduced. Previous studies of patients with syncope have not evaluated the contribution of left ventricular performance in risk stratification for sudden death. The purpose of our study of a large population of patients with syncope was to determine the impact of left ventricular dysfunction on sudden death risk if syncope is caused by a cardiac cause or remains unexplained after electrophysiologic testing. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship of left ventricular ejection fraction to sudden death prognosis in 88 consecutive patients referred for electrophysiologic testing to determine a cause of syncope. The mean age was 57 +/- 18 years, left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.41 +/- 0.20, and 66 patients (75%) had structural heart disease. In 49 patients (56%) a cardiac cause of syncope was diagnosed, and in 39 patients (44%) the cause of syncope remained unexplained after evaluation. Cardiac syncope was attributed to ventricular tachycardia in 27 patients, bradyarrhythmia in 11 patients, and supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in 11 patients. By logistic regression only structural heart disease was independently associated with cardiac cause of syncope (p = 0.003). After a mean follow-up of 790 +/- 688 days, nine patients had died suddenly, eight (89%) of whom had left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.30.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Significance of aborted cardiac arrest and sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients referred for treatment therapy of advanced heart failure

Cardiac arrest in patients with heart failure may be the result of remediable factors such as pulmonary edema, drug toxicity, or electrolyte abnormalities, or it may be due to primary arrhythmias. The relation of prior aborted cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia to subsequent prognosis was assessed in 458 consecutive patients referred for management of advanced heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 0.2 +/- 0.07). All patients received tailored vasodilator and diuretic therapy and were then followed as outpatients. Patients were divided into four groups: 388 patients (85%) with no prior cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia, 31 patients (7%) with a primary arrhythmia cardiac arrest, 22 patients (5%) with a secondary cardiac arrest, and 17 patients (4%) with sustained ventricular tachycardia without cardiac arrest. Patients with cardiac arrest resulting from a primary arrhythmia were usually treated with antiarrhythmic drugs (25 patients), and five patients received an implantable defibrillator. After hospital discharge actuarial 1-year sudden death risk (17%) and total mortality (24%) rates for the group with primary arrhythmia were similar to corresponding values in patients with no history of cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia (17% and 30%, respectively). In patients with a secondary cardiac arrest as a result of exacerbation of heart failure (11 patients), torsade de pointes (10 patients), or hypokalemia (one patient), therapy focused on removal of aggravating factors. Actuarial 1-year sudden death (39%) and total mortality (54%) rates for the group with secondary arrest were higher than for patients without a history of cardiac arrest (p = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Slowing of ventricular tachycardia as a possible endpoint for serial drug testing at electrophysiological study

Certain patients who cannot be rendered noninducible by serial drug testing during electrophysiology study demonstrate significant slowing of their ventricular tachycardia rate with selected agents. We evaluated the characteristics and outcome of 19 such patients to assess whether this slowing could be considered an acceptable endpoint for treatment. This group consisted of 14 males and 5 females (mean age 63 +/- 9) with a mean ejection fraction of 28 +/- 13% and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Sixteen patients had known coronary artery disease and 13 had prior myocardial infarction. The other three patients had idiopathic cardiomyopathy. Serial drug testing during an electrophysiology protocol that used up to three extrastimuli at two or three cycle lengths at two right ventricular sites was used to select a medication regimen that provided optimal ventricular tachycardia slowing without limiting side effects. Five patients were treated with amiodarone, three with Ic agents (all with ejection fraction greater than 30%), and the remainder with Ia and Ib agents alone or in combination. Mean initial ventricular tachycardia rate was 219 +/- 26 beats/min with posttreatment ventricular tachycardia rate 137 +/- 17 (mean initial cycle length 278 +/- 35 msec, posttreatment 443 +/- 53 msec). Two groups were identified, those who had recurrent (although well-tolerated) ventricular tachycardia (group I, n = 8, mean time to recurrence = 15 months), and those who did not (group II, n = 11, mean follow-up 22 months). Overall sudden death rate was 5%, while total mortality was 11% (all mortality in group I).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Events in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST): mortality in patients surviving open label titration but not randomized to double-blind therapy

The patient characteristics and outcomes were studied in the 318 patients who survived open label drug titration in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) and who were not randomized to double-blind therapy and in 942 patients, who were randomized to double-blind placebo therapy. The patients randomized to placebo therapy had a lower total mortality or resuscitated cardiac arrest rate (4% vs. 8.5%). However, at baseline, nonrandomized patients were dissimilar from patients randomized to placebo in the following ways: older; lower left ventricular ejection fraction; greater use of digitalis, diuretic drugs and antihypertensive agents; lesser use of beta-adrenoceptor blocking agents and more frequent prior cardiac problems, including runs of ventricular tachycardia and left bundle branch block. A matched comparison that took these inequities into account showed no significant differences in mortality or rate of resuscitation from cardiac arrest between nonrandomized patients and clinically equivalent patients randomized to placebo. Cox regression analysis indicated that two factors significantly increased the hazard ratio for arrhythmic death or resuscitated cardiac arrest in the nonrandomized patients: female gender (4.7, p less than 0.05) and electrocardiographic events (ventricular tachycardia, proarrhythmia, widened QRS complex, heart block, bradycardia) during open label titration (7.0, p less than 0.005). However, some potentially important differences between men and women were not included in the Cox regression model. Of the nonrandomized patients, approximately 70% were not randomized because of lack of suppression of ventricular premature depolarizations or adverse events, or both, and the remaining 30% because of patient or private physician request with no indication of another reason.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Drug response at electropharmacologic study in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: the importance of ventricular refractoriness

The clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of successful antiarrhythmic drug therapy for patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia were evaluated in 59 consecutive patients undergoing serial electropharmacologic trials. Structural heart disease was less frequently present in patients for whom effective therapy was found (p less than 0.05). The presence of coronary artery disease and a history of prior myocardial infarction were significantly more frequently present in patients for whom antiarrhythmic drug therapy could not be found (p less than 0.05). The corrected QT interval and ventricular effective refractory period measured at a pacing cycle length of 400 ms were significantly shorter in responders compared with nonresponders (QT interval 428 +/- 52 versus 460 +/- 59 ms; ventricular effective refractory period 237 +/- 28 versus 254 +/- 24 ms; (p less than 0.05). In addition, the interelectrogram coupling interval of the ventricular extrastimulus initiating ventricular tachycardia was significantly shorter in responders compared with nonresponders (223 +/- 37 versus 251 +/- 33 ms; p = 0.003). Logistic regression analysis identified a short ventricular interelectrogram coupling interval (p less than 0.01) and absence of prior myocardial infarction (p less than 0.05) as the only independent predictors of antiarrhythmic drug suppression of the induction of ventricular tachycardia. Greater drug-induced increments in the ventricular effective and functional refractory periods were observed in responders than in nonresponders as was the shortest ventricular interelectrogram coupling interval. Thus, baseline electrophysiologic measurements identify patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia who are likely to respond to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Furthermore, these patients demonstrate greater drug-induced electrophysiologic changes.

Drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias: how many electropharmacologic trials are appropriate?

To determine how many electropharmacologic drug trials should be performed to select therapy for patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, the outcome of 150 consecutive patients with inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias undergoing serial electropharmacologic testing was examined. The probability of identifying predicted effective therapy (inductive of fewer than five ventricular responses with three ventricular extrastimuli at three pacing cycle lengths) and the probability of that therapy preventing sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrences were determined as a function of the number of preceding trials. The probability ( +/- SE) of identifying predicted effective therapy by the first trial (0.23 +/- 0.03) was significantly higher than that of the second (0.09 +/- 0.04), third (0.08 +/- 0.04) and fourth (0.05 +/- 0.04) trials (p = 0.001). No patient had predicted effective therapy identified by subsequent trials. The 2 year actuarial probability of freedom from sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias on predicted effective therapy was higher for the first (0.79 +/- 0.08), second (0.73 +/- 0.13) and third (0.86 +/- 0.13) trials than for the fourth (0.33 +/- 0.27) trial (p = 0.02). Thus, the probability of selecting therapy with long-term efficacy was highest for the first trial (0.18), intermediate for the second (0.07) and third (0.07) trials and lowest for the fourth (0.02) and subsequent (0.00) trials. Accordingly, the electropharmacologic approach to therapy selection should be abandoned after three unsuccessful trials.

Treatment of ventricular tachycardia induced cardiogenic shock by percoronary chemical ablation

Incessant ventricular arrhythmias pose an especially challenging therapeutic dilemma. We describe the successful treatment and follow-up of a patient with refractory ventricular tachycardia-induced cardiogenic shock with percoronary chemical ablation. After endocardial mapping was used to identify the "tachycardia-related" coronary artery, temporary termination of the arrhythmia with balloon occlusion and subselective intracoronary installation of iced saline as previously advocated was unsuccessful. This was probably due to a dual arterial blood supply to the arrhythmogenic focus. However, infusion of 2 cc ethanol (99%) permanently terminated the arrhythmia. Contrary to previous experience, ethanol-induced arrhythmia termination did not result in arterial occlusion, further supporting a direct toxic effect on the myocardium as its mode of action. Use of standard angioplasty balloon inflation prevents "backwash" of distally infused ethanol and more generalized cell death. The only complication of this procedure was temporary third-degree AV block, requiring permanent pacemaker implantation.

Selecting therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardias: importance of the sensitivity and specificity of programmed electrical stimulation for predicting arrhythmia recurrences

Antiarrhythmic therapy for prevention of sustained ventricular tachycardia is commonly guided by programmed electrical stimulation, and the persistent ability to initiate ventricular tachycardia during drug therapy often leads to the use of nonpharmacologic therapies such as surgery. Prior studies suggest that programmed stimulation has a high sensitivity but a lower specificity for predicting recurrences of ventricular tachycardia during drug therapy. We constructed a model to evaluate the impact of various programmed stimulation specificities and sensitivities on total mortality when patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia during drug therapy proceed to arrhythmia surgery. Assumptions for this model included an 11.5% surgical mortality, a 13% risk of arrhythmia recurrence for surgery survivors, and that 33% of ventricular tachycardia recurrences are fatal. In this model the relative impact of test sensitivity and specificity on total population mortality depended on the pretest probability that drug therapy would be effective. When this probability was high, variations in test sensitivity had relatively little impact on mortality, but a low specificity increased mortality by increasing the number of false positive patients treated surgically who then suffered the surgical mortality. When the probability of effective drug therapy was low, varying test specificity had relatively little impact on mortality, but a low sensitivity increased mortality by increasing the number of patients with a false negative test who suffered fatal arrhythmia recurrences. If the specificity of programmed stimulation is low and the probability that drug therapy will be effective is high, the total population mortality can exceed the mortality expected from drug therapy alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A comparison of sotalol and procainamide in symptomatic ventricular tachycardia

The effects of oral sotalol were compared with 1000 and 1500 mg of procainamide in 23 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia. The predictive value of an induction study after procainamide was assessed. The mean age of the study group was 62 +/- 12 years, and the mean ejection fraction was 32 +/- 16%. The cycle length (CL) of the induced tachycardia, the coupling interval (CI) of the first extrastimulus (in ms), and the number of noninducible (NI) patients are given in the table below. (table; see text) One patient developed torsades during the loading period of sotalol and is included in the number requiring cardioversion (DC). Important proarrhythmic effects (spontaneous occurrence of tachycardia) were seen twice after procainamide. Induction suppression by procainamide predicted success with sotalol (p = 0.0013).

CONCLUSION

Ventricular tachycardia seems to be less often inducible after oral sotalol than after procainamide. The success of procainamide during programmed electrical stimulation predicts the same for sotalol. If ventricular tachycardia remains inducible after oral sotalol, it is faster than after procainamide but slower than the baseline tachycardia. Both drugs slightly prolong refractoriness.

Relation of baseline characteristics to suppression of ventricular arrhythmias during placebo and active antiarrhythmic therapy in patients after myocardial infarction

In the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS), patients early (6-60 days) after acute myocardial infarction (MI) with ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) of over 10 per hour were randomized to receive, unaware, therapy with one of four antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 402) or placebo (n = 100). Treatment success was defined as 70% or more decrease in VPC rate and 90% or more decrease in VPC runs. If the first active drug was ineffective, a second drug was given. If placebo was ineffective, a second placebo was given. To determine whether or not baseline clinical characteristics predict the response to antiarrhythmic therapy, 10 baseline variables were selected for investigation: age, prior MI, time from CAPS MI to randomization, ejection fraction, baseline VPC frequency, presence of runs (greater than or equal to 3 consecutive VPCs, greater than or equal to 100 beats/min), beta-blocker therapy, digitalis therapy, MI transmurality, and MI location. At the end of the first drug treatment, apparent treatment success in patients receiving placebo was associated on univariate analysis with absence of prior MI, with trends for younger age and Q wave MI, whereas in patients receiving active therapies, higher ejection fraction and younger age were associated with better suppression. In the encainide and flecainide treatments, where the greatest response was observed, absence of prior MI, higher ejection fraction, and younger age were associated with more successful treatment. In a multivariate analysis with these variables, ejection fraction and age remained significant for all active therapies, absence of prior MI and ejection fraction remained significant in the encainide and flecainide treatments, and absence of prior MI in the placebo treatment. Few variables except ejection fraction were associated with VPC suppression during the 1-year follow-up, and only lower ejection fraction and older age related to loss of long-term suppression. Thus, there are only a few independent baseline clinical variables (notably, ejection fraction) that substantially affect antiarrhythmic drug efficacy in suppressing VPCs in patients early after MI. Some variables, however, may be associated with spontaneous arrhythmia variability, leading to an apparent (placebo) response. These findings will be helpful in designing and interpreting treatment studies in patients after MI.

Drug therapy for survivors of sudden cardiac death

The proliferation of standard as well as novel community based systems for resuscitation of victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has provided a large group of sudden cardiac death survivors who present a therapeutic challenge. The nature and severity of the underlying heart disease must be delineated. Particularly, myocardial ischemia and congestive heart failure must be controlled. Prior to considering device therapy of surgical intervention, pharmacologic therapy should be evaluated. Baseline electrophysiological studies determine the applicability of serial pharmacologic testing. In patients with inducible VT/VF, serial electrophysiological testing can identify drug regimens that prevent the arrhythmia in approximately 40% of patients. In an additional 20% of patients, regimens which slow the ventricular tachycardia and significantly reduce the arrhythmia related mortality can be identified. Three to 5-year follow-up has shown such an approach can reduce the sudden death mortality in these patients to less than 3% per year. It has been suggested that certain medication, most notably amiodarone, electrophysiological testing has not been useful in assessing efficacy. Several recent studies, however, have shown that electrophysiological testing is indeed useful even in evaluating the efficacy of amiodarone. In patients in whom ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation cannot be prevented or significantly slowed, medical therapy is generally ineffective and the sudden death mortality is 20% to 40% per year. In such patients, other therapeutic modalities should be considered.

Electrophysiologic evaluation of antiarrhythmic therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The use of electrophysiologic studies has contributed significantly to our understanding of the mechanisms of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and enhanced our ability to assess objectively the efficacy of various therapeutic interventions in modifying or preventing their recurrence. The basis on which electrophysiologic testing techniques is founded is the ability reproducibility to initiate ventricular arrhythmias by programmed electrical stimulation in patients with a history of recurrent ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Ventricular tachycardia can be initiated by electrophysiologic studies in approximately 90% of patients with clinically documented recurrent, sustained ventricular tachycardia related to coronary artery disease and in 60% of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Reports indicate that electrophysiologic testing is highly specific as well (99% for sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia). Studies in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia demonstrate that prevention by antiarrhythmic drugs of the ability to initiate tachycardias that were previously inducible by comparable stimulation techniques in the absence of therapy is highly predictive of freedom from recurrent episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. This end point can be achieved in 35 to 75% of patients. This wide range of success rates results from differences in the patient populations studied, as well as major differences in the programmed stimulation and antiarrhythmic drug protocols used among laboratories. The positive predictive value of this technique (defined as the percentage of patients in whom complete suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation is achieved during electrophysiologic testing with antiarrhythmic drugs and in whom no spontaneous arrhythmia occurs at 1- to 2-year follow-up) ranges between 80 and 95%.

Clinical predictors of arrhythmia inducibility in survivors of cardiac arrest: importance of gender and prior myocardial infarction

Clinical characteristics that correlate with arrhythmia inducibility were determined in 150 consecutive survivors of cardiac arrest. All underwent electrophysiologic study with a uniform protocol when they were not receiving antiarrhythmic drugs. A ventricular tachyarrhythmia (sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia) was induced in 113 patients (75%). The strongest correlates of inducing a tachyarrhythmia were male gender (p less than 0.0001) and a history of prior myocardial infarction (p less than 0.0001). Induction of sustained monomorphic tachycardia alone was also strongly related to gender and prior infarction; in particular, none of 26 women without prior infarction had induction of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Among patients with induced sustained tachyarrhythmias, those with induced monomorphic ventricular tachycardia were distinguished from those with induced ventricular fibrillation in they were more likely to have coronary artery disease (p = 0.0001), healed myocardial infarction (p = 0.0002), left ventricular aneurysm (p = 0.0007) and ventricular tachycardia documented at the time of cardiac arrest (p = 0.02). Other variables showing significant correlations with arrhythmia inducibility were ejection fraction, documentation of ventricular tachycardia at the time of cardiac arrest and presence of an intraventricular conduction delay. However, stepwise logistic regression identified male gender and healed myocardial infarction as the only independent predictors of arrhythmia inducibility. On the basis of these two variables alone, arrhythmia inducibility or noninducibility could be correctly predicted in 89% of the patients in this series.

Prediction of successful suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias by serial drug testing from data derived at the initial electrophysiologic study

This study investigated whether data available after the initial electrophysiologic study in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia could identify those patients in whom serial drug testing is likely to be efficacious. One hundred six patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, whose initial study included short-term drug testing with intravenous procainamide, were evaluated. The baseline arrhythmia induced (in the absence of all antiarrhythmic drugs) was monomorphic tachycardia with a cycle length greater than 200 ms in 81 patients and ventricular flutter or fibrillation in the remaining 25 patients. After intravenous infusion of procainamide (1,250 +/- 300 mg), a ventricular tachyarrhythmia could still be induced in 80 patients during testing with up to three extrastimuli. Serial drug testing with one to four trials of oral conventional and investigational agents was then undertaken. Evaluation of 15 clinical, hemodynamic and electrophysiologic variables by stepwise logistic regression identified two independent predictors of successful response to oral antiarrhythmic drugs: 1) noninducibility of ventricular tachycardia after intravenous procainamide (p less than 0.001), and 2) left ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 40% (p less than 0.05). Subgroup analysis combining each of these variables identified patients with a high, intermediate or low probability of finding a successful oral drug regimen. Patients whose arrhythmia was suppressed by intravenous procainamide had a 100% likelihood (if left ventricular ejection fraction was greater than or equal to 40%) or an 87% likelihood (if ejection fraction was less than 40%) of responding to an oral regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reappraisal of criteria for assessing drug efficacy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: complete versus partial suppression of inducible arrhythmias

To test whether increased difficulty in inducing ventricular tachycardia during antiarrhythmic therapy can be considered a sufficient criterion for predicting long-term efficacy of such therapy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, 95 patients were studied with a graded stimulation protocol (single and double premature stimuli during sinus rhythm and ventricular drives of 120, 140, 160 and 180 beats/min). After a control study, the effects of oral antiarrhythmic drugs on the ability to induce ventricular tachycardia were assessed. The median number of drug trials was four per patient. After antiarrhythmic therapy, four subgroups of patients were identified. In 36 patients, there was no change in inducibility (group 1), whereas in 18 patients ventricular tachycardia was rendered more difficult to induce; that is, a sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible at a basic drive at least 40 beats/min faster than during the control study (group 2). In 34 patients, ventricular tachycardia induction was suppressed (group 3) and in 7 patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, only 3 to 5 repetitive ventricular responses were induced after treatment (group 4). During follow-up of 15.5 +/- 11.5 months, 10 patients of group 1 had a recurrence of ventricular tachycardia and 6 died suddenly, whereas in group 2 only 1 patient died suddenly and in group 3, 2 patients had a recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (group 1 versus 2 and 3, p less than 0.001, Mantel-Cox and Breslow; group 2 versus 3, no difference). Thus, increased difficulty in inducing ventricular tachycardia is a sufficient criterion for predicting long-term efficacy of an antiarrhythmic drug regimen.

Relation of acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy to left ventricular function in coronary artery disease

This study assessed the relation between acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy and left ventricular (LV) function in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, that is, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Electrophysiologic studies (n = 560) were performed in 201 patients, separated for analysis into less than 30 and greater than or equal to 30% ejection fraction groups. Coronary artery disease was present in all patients. The 8 acute antiarrhythmic regimens were procainamide, quinidine, mexiletine, mexiletine + type 1A agent, flecainide or indecainide, amiodarone, amiodarone + type 1A and "miscellaneous" agents. At least 1 successful acute antiarrhythmic regimen was found in 47% of patients and in a significantly greater proportion of patients with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30% (52 of 81 = 64%) than in those with ejection fraction less than 30% (43 of 120 = 36%, p less than 0.001). Drug trials were successful (initiation of less than 15 repetitive ventricular responses) in 32% of patients with ejection fraction greater than or equal to 30% versus 19% of those with ejection fraction less than 30% (p less than 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 ejection fraction groups in type of heart disease, acute antiarrhythmic dosages or mean serum drug levels. A logistic regression analysis incorporating multiple clinically relevant factors found that ejection fraction was the only factor that correlated significantly with drug success or failure (p less than 0.002). Acute antiarrhythmic drug efficacy relates to LV function per se or to other pathophysiologic mechanisms of which ejection fraction may be a marker.

Electrophysiologic study in the management of cardiac arrest survivors: a critical review

This review discusses the value and limitations of EPS in the management of cardiac arrest survivors. Uncertainties associated with EPS include a lack of consensus with respect to stimulation protocol, end points for VT suppression during drug testing, significance of induced polymorphic VT or VF, and timing of EPS after myocardial infarction. Despite methodologic shortcomings in most clinical studies, a useful body of knowledge has emerged. In cardiac arrest survivors, incidence of inducible sustained VT ranged from 35% to 75%. Where induced VT (sustained or nonsustained) was successfully suppressed, recurrent arrhythmic events occurred in 0% to 33% of patients over a 1- to 5-year follow-up period. Failed regimens correlated with a high risk of arrhythmic recurrence. EPS also helps to select patients for the implantable defibrillator or electrocardiac surgery. In conclusion, EPS appears empirically useful in the management of cardiac arrest survivors with coronary artery disease; its value in other disease entities is uncertain.

Reduction in sudden death and total mortality by antiarrhythmic therapy evaluated by electrophysiologic drug testing: criteria of efficacy in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia

Reports of the results of electrophysiologic testing of antiarrhythmic regimens have concentrated on inducibility of ventricular tachycardias during drug treatment. Many drug regimens, however, affect the tachycardia but fail to prevent its initiation. In this study, 258 patients who underwent serial electrophysiologic studies were followed up. The patients were divided into three groups on the basis of the results of electrophysiologic testing. Group 1 included patients in whom the initiation of ventricular tachycardia was prevented by the drug regimen. In groups 2 and 3 the ventricular tachycardia was still inducible with the discharge drug regimen. In group 2, the drug regimen demonstrated a beneficial response (that is, the tachycardia cycle length increased by greater than 100 ms and the tachycardia did not produce severe symptoms). In group 3, the regimen did not produce a beneficial response. During follow-up, recurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia occurred in 7 (7%) of 103 group 1 patients but in 20 (39%) of 51 and 52 (50%) of 104 group 2 and 3 patients, respectively. However, the total mortality and sudden death mortality rates were substantially reduced in group 2 (12 and 4%, respectively) compared with group 3 (39 and 34%). In fact, the total mortality and sudden death mortality in groups 1 and 2 were not significantly different. Thus, under certain circumstances, a drug regimen that produces a beneficial response may be an acceptable clinical alternative, particularly when no regimen prevents induction of ventricular tachycardia.

Electrophysiologic assessment of antiarrhythmic drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with dilated cardiomyopathy

To determine the benefit of serial electrophysiologic drug testing in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias related to dilated cardiomyopathy, programmed ventricular stimulation was performed in 38 patients. In the baseline study, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was induced in 18 patients, ventricular fibrillation in 7 and nonsustained VT in 13. The patients underwent a total of 84 trials of drug therapy (mean 2.3 +/- 1.4 trials/patient). Complete success (induction of fewer than 6 repetitive responses) was recorded in 19 trials and partial success (induction of at least 6 but no more than 15 repetitive responses) in 7. Potential proarrhythmic effects were observed in 9 trials. Overall, at least 1 successful regimen was identified for 20 patients (53%). During a mean follow-up of 21 +/- 13 months, there were no arrhythmia recurrences or episodes of sudden death among patients discharged with a drug regimen determined to be effective by serial drug testing. In comparison, among patients taking regimens that failed to prevent arrhythmia induction, there were 3 arrhythmia recurrences and 2 sudden deaths (p less than 0.05). Serial electrophysiologic drug testing provides an effective method of identifying successful medical therapy for patients with ventricular arrhythmia related to dilated cardiomyopathy.

Ethmozine: electrophysiology, hemodynamics, and antiarrhythmic efficacy in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias

Thirteen patients with drug-resistant, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) at electrophysiologic study received moricizine HC1 (ethmozine), 10 mg/kg/day orally. Eight patients underwent electrophysiologic study before and after drug administration; the arrhythmia became noninducible in one. In five other patients, spontaneous sustained VT occurred after 1 to 5 days of drug therapy, and one patient had a worsening of arrhythmias on ethmozine. Ethmozine prolonged infranodal conduction time (HV interval) (51.4 +/- 13.8 msec to 69.3 +/- 17.7 msec [mean +/- SD]), PR interval (201 +/- 28.1 msec to 244 +/- 62.2 msec), and QRS interval (123 +/- 27 msec to 147 +/- 32 msec). Ventricular refractory periods were not consistently affected, and only the one patient who became noninducible had an increase in effective ventricular refractory period (280 to 310 msec). The drug had no significant effect on sinus cycle length or sinus node recovery time, atrial conduction or refractoriness, or atrioventricular nodal refractoriness. Ethmozine had no effect on radionuclide ejection fraction (25.5 +/- 12.7% to 28.2 +/- 13.8%) or cardiac index (2.4 +/- 0.7 to 3.0 +/- 0.6 ml/min/m2) and caused no significant changes in mean aortic, right atrial, pulmonary arterial, or pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. Although the drug is well tolerated and produces no untoward hemodynamic effects, ethmozine is relatively ineffective in patients with sustained VT refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic agents.