Improved prediction of peak left ventricular pressure by echocardiography in children with aortic stenosis

Supernormal ejection performance is isolated to the ipsilateral congenitally pressure-overloaded ventricle

Congenital left ventricular pressure overload is associated with "excessive" hypertrophy that leads to subnormal afterload (wall stress), permitting enhanced ventricular ejection performance. Whether congenital right ventricular pressure overload is associated with a similar phenomenon is uncertain. It is also unknown whether supranormal ejection performance affects only the overloaded ventricle or is a general process affecting both ventricles. Conflicting data exist about whether the hypertrophic process associated with pressure overload is induced primarily by local loading conditions or by neuroendocrine influences. If the former postulate is true, the hypertrophic response should be confined to the overloaded ventricle; if the latter is true, one might predict that both ventricles would be affected by a less specific response to circulating catecholamines. To help resolve these issues, both right and left ventricular performance was examined in seven patients with isolated congenital pulmonary stenosis (average pulmonary pressure gradient 78 +/- 13 mm Hg), six patients with isolated congenital aortic stenosis (average gradient 80 +/- 10 mm Hg) and six normal subjects. Right ventricular ejection fraction was increased in patients with pulmonary stenosis (61 +/- 2%) compared with the value in normal subjects (53 +/- 2%, p less than 0.01) and in patients with aortic stenosis (50 +/- 3%, p = 0.007). Left ventricular ejection fraction was increased in patients with congenital aortic stenosis (84 +/- 4%) compared with the value in normal subjects (70 +/- 4%, p less than 0.01) and in patients with congenital pulmonary stenosis (65 +/- 2%, p less than 0.002).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Internal consistency of echocardiographic estimates of the severity of left ventricular outflow obstruction

To determine their internal consistency, M-mode and Doppler echocardiography were used to estimate the gradient across the left ventricular outflow tract during 74 evaluations of 50 infants, children, and young adults with congenital valvular (n = 43), subvalvular (n = 6), and supravalvular (n = 1) aortic stenosis. By M-mode the gradient was estimated from the wall-stress formula (left ventricular pressure = 225 x wall thickness/end-systolic diameter) minus systolic blood pressure determined by sphygmomanometry. Doppler (pulsed or continuous wave) methods utilized the Bernoulli formula (gradient = 4 x V2). There was good agreement between the M-mode and Doppler estimates of outflow gradient in most patients (r = 0.69, standard error of the estimate = 26.9). In 46 of 74 comparisons (62%) the two estimates differed by less than 20 mm Hg, and the estimates placed the patient in the same clinical class (mild, moderate, or severe). In 22 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, there was only a fair correlation between the M-mode (r = 0.50) and Doppler (r = 0.58) gradients and those obtained at catheterization. Each noninvasive technique yielded major overestimates or underestimates of the gradient in several instances. The M-mode and Doppler techniques for estimating the severity of congenital aortic stenosis are complementary. Their combined use minimizes but does not totally eliminate errors of overestimation or underestimation of outflow gradient.

Determination of aortic valve orifice area in aortic valve stenosis by two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography was used to measure aortic valve orifice area in 24 patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) and 15 patients without aortic valve disease. Using transesophageal echocardiography, orifice area could be measured in 20 of 24 patients with AS. With transthoracic echocardiography, orifice area could be determined in only 2 of 24 patients. In patients with AS, orifice area determined by transesophageal echocardiography was 0.75 +/- 0.34 cm2 and that calculated with Gorlin's formula was 0.75 +/- 0.32 cm2. In normal aortic valves, orifice area was 3.9 +/- 1.2 cm2 by transesophageal echocardiography. A good correlation was demonstrated between aortic valve orifice area determined using transesophageal echocardiography and calculated orifice area using Gorlin's formula in patients with AS: r = 0.92, standard error of estimate = 0.14 cm2. The absolute difference between orifice area measured with both methods ranged from 0.0 to 0.4 cm2 (mean 0.09 +/- 0.1). In 4 patients orifice area could not be determined with transesophageal echocardiography. The orifice could not be identified in 2 patients because an appropriate cross-sectional view of the aortic valve could not be achieved and in 2 patients with pinhole stenosis (aortic valve orifice area 0.3 cm2). These data show that aortic valve orifice area can be measured reliably using 2-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Left ventricular wall stress and function in childhood coarctation of the aorta

Unlike most adults with compensated pressure overload of the left ventricle, children with moderate to severe aortic stenosis exhibit pronounced left ventricular muscle hypertrophy, enhanced ejection performance and diminished wall stress. To determine whether these findings are present in other forms of left ventricular pressure overload in children, left ventricular mechanics were studied by catheterization in 14 children with coarctation of the aorta (average peak gradient 39 +/- 17 mm Hg) and in 10 normal children. Ejection fraction and mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening in the coarctation group (0.74 +/- 0.09 and 1.71 +/- 0.43 circumferences/s, respectively) were significantly higher than in normal subjects (0.65 +/- 0.05 and 1.27 +/- 0.26 circumferences/s, respectively) (p = 0.008), but the ranges for both groups overlapped. End-systolic stress in children with coarctation (77 +/- 20 dynes X 10(3)/cm2) was less than in normal children (121 +/- 24 dynes X 10(3)/cm2) (p less than 0.001), again with overlap of the ranges for both groups. The ratio of end-systolic stress to end-systolic volume index, an estimate of contractile function, was similar in both groups. Relations between severity of obstruction (left ventricular peak systolic pressure, coarctation gradient) and end-systolic stress and between stress and ejection performance were present within the coarctation group. Comparison of these data with those found in children with moderate to severe aortic stenosis shows a similar but less pronounced response to pressure overload due to coarctation of the aorta.