Acute nifedipine withdrawal: consequences of preoperative and late cessation of therapy in patients with prior unstable angina

Calcium channel antagonists in the management of anginal syndromes: changing concepts in relation to the role of coronary vasospasm

Despite the increasing evidence that alterations in coronary vascular tone can and do occur in patients with anginal syndromes, only in a minority of such patients with Prinzmetal's angina is there decisive evidence that the coronary vasodilation induced by calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) plays a specific therapeutic role. CCAs may also give therapeutic benefit in a number of conditions in which coronary vasoconstriction may contribute to ischemia, such as hyperventilation, cold-induced angina, or silent ischemia not caused by an increase in heart rate. Thus, the decision of whether or not to use CCAs in angina syndromes will often have to be made on grounds other than what appears to be a minor role of vasospasm in the overall spectrum of angina. There are preliminary indications that the long-term prognosis may be different among different categories of CCAs.

Diltiazem withdrawal before coronary artery bypass surgery

The authors studied the effects of withdrawing oral diltiazem therapy on the subsequent course of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Patients with severe coronary artery disease were divided into three groups using a prospective, controlled, randomized protocol. In group D (diltiazem-continuation) patients, diltiazem was administered 2.1 +/- 0.1 hours (mean +/- SEM) before anesthetic induction (n = 10). Group DW (diltiazem-withdrawal) patients received their final diltiazem dose 17.3 +/- 2.9 hours before anesthesia (n = 10). Group R was a reference group of patients not receiving diltiazem (n = 11; not randomized). Anesthesia was induced and maintained with fentanyl and pancuronium without use of halogenated anesthetics. No clinically important differences were detected in measured hemodynamics or drug requirements. Group D patients did not have a lower systemic vascular resistance (SVR) index (P greater than 0.31) or mean arterial pressure (P greater than 0.08) compared with group DW. Also, no evidence for a diltiazem withdrawal response was found, because group DW did not have either a higher SVR index (P = 0.99) or a higher pulmonary vascular resistance index (P = 0.99) compared with group R, and no severe myocardial ischemia, coronary artery spasm, or postoperative heart block were seen. Plasma diltiazem concentrations decreased significantly during CPB (P less than 0.0001), but showed overlap between groups D and DW. Plasma diltiazem concentration did not correlate significantly with simultaneous SVR. These data show the benign effects of both diltiazem administration and its acute withdrawal before coronary artery bypass surgery with high-dose fentanyl anesthesia.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part IV: Side effects and contraindications drug interactions and combinations

With the correct selection of drug and patient, the calcium antagonists as a group can be remarkably effective at relatively low cost of serious side effects. Almost all side effects are dose related. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil (or diltiazem) is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine which actually has the most marked negative inotropic effect. Yet caution is required when even calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide. The most marked interaction with digoxin is that with verapamil, which may raise digoxin levels by over 50%. Combination therapy of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers is increasingly common, and is probably safest in the case of dihydropyridines. Other combinations being explored are those with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.

Calcium antagonists for angina pectoris

Angina presents itself to us as a continuous spectrum of ischemic syndromes. The disease is multifactorial, and within the same patient different pathophysiological mechanisms may occur at different times and in succession. Several factors may be causative at a particular moment of the disease process and the very next moment a different mechanism may prevail or spontaneous improvement may occur. Among these are stable atheroma with episodic increased vasomotor tone, fissured plaques with intraluminal and/or intraintimal thrombus, thrombocyte aggregation in greater than 70% intraluminal narrowing from ulcerated plaques, as well as frank spasm of vessels without major atherosclerosis. Consequently, there will never be one therapy for every case of (un)stable angina nor will there ever be a best therapy for all. Rather, a stepped approach appears the most likely to be successful. This begins with bed rest and requires vasodilator therapy with nitrates and/or Ca2+ antagonists and beta blockade. If this triple therapy does not "cool" the symptoms within 6-12 hours, semiurgent arteriography is indicated. Depending on the pathophysiology found, thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) must be carried out early. Heparin in the short term and aspirin in the long term protect best against late complications. The moment is now here when infarction or death after an attack of angina pectoris should be rare.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part II: Use and comparative properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonists in ischemic heart disease, including recommendations based on an analysis of 41 trials

An analysis of 41 trials of angina of all varieties confirms that calcium antagonists are an important advance and are now established therapy for these syndromes. In effort angina, verapamil in a dose of 360-480 mg daily is better than propranolol in standard doses. Although nifedipine is highly effective against vasospastic angina, its use in threatened myocardial infarction or severe unstable angina is not supported by recent studies, unless combined with a beta-blocker. Diltiazem has recently been tested with apparent benefit in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Otherwise, these calcium antagonist agents all seem to have approximate equipotency in clinical ischemic syndromes including effort and vasospastic angina. Subjective side effects seem most troublesome in the case of nifedipine. All three calcium antagonists, especially nifedipine, have been successfully combined with beta-blocker therapy, yet occasional additive negative inotropic or chronotropic or dromotropic interactions may occur when verapamil or diltiazem is added to beta-blockade, and occasionally the direct negative inotropic potential of nifedipine may become evident. The choice between the calcium antagonists is determined not only by the clinical picture but also by the anticipated side effects in a given patient and by the overall cardiovascular status. In patients with supraventricular tachycardias or sinus tachycardia, verapamil or diltiazem is preferred, whereas in patients with a resting bradycardia or borderline heart failure nifedipine is likely to be chosen.

Calcium channel blockers and cardiac surgery

Calcium channel blockers have an important role in the pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disorders. These agents act by inhibiting the slow inward current into excitable cells, exert direct negative inotropic, chronotropic, and dromotropic activity, and are potent vasodilators. These direct effects are modified by reflex autonomic stimulation and by pathologic states. Serious adverse effects of the calcium channel blockers are most frequently observed in patients with ventricular dysfunction, conduction system disease, or concomitant beta blockade. Calcium channel blockers are indicated in the treatment of angina pectoris, supraventricular arrhythmias, and hypertension. The use of these agents in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension is investigational. The calcium channel blockers are gaining increased importance in the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Verapamil is indicated for the treatment of post-cardiac-surgical atrial flutter and fibrillation; however, the calcium antagonists are not effective as prophylaxis against postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias. Laboratory studies have shown that drug interactions exist between calcium channel blockers and inhalational anesthetics and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents; clinical studies have demonstrated that these interactions are rarely significant. Perioperative coronary spasm can be effectively treated with the calcium channel blockers. The timing of calcium antagonist withdrawal prior to surgery is controversial, but continuation of therapy until surgery is usually safe. The clinical significance of platelet function inhibition by the calcium antagonists is unknown. Protection of ischemic myocardium by calcium channel blockers has been demonstrated. Important interactions between the calcium antagonists, hypothermia, and the ionic constituents of cardioplegia require further study before the role of these agents as adjuncts to clinical cardioplegia is defined. Expanded indications and the introduction of new calcium channel blockers will result in increased use of these agents in the future.

Postoperative ST-segment elevation in coronary artery bypass surgery

Using Holter monitors, 50 patients were monitored for vasospasm following coronary artery bypass surgery. Transient 2 mm ST-segment elevation was considered to be diagnostic or coronary vasospasm. Four patients (8 percent) had evidence of coronary vasospasm. Over 30 variables, including preoperative demographic information and medication, intraoperative technique, and postoperative medication, were subjected to multiple stepwise regression analysis. This analysis failed to show any association between preoperative prophylaxis with either nifedipine or nitrates (or other variables) and the postoperative development of coronary vasospasm. We conclude that the incidence of coronary vasospasm is more common than previously thought, and that a nifedipine or nitrate withdrawal, in this study, was not associated with an increased incidence of postoperative coronary vasospasm.

Therapeutic choices in unstable angina

Unstable angina pectoris is a high-risk ischemic syndrome with complex, interacting pathophysiologic mechanisms that include coronary atherosclerosis, coronary vasoconstriction, and thrombosis. The roles of various medical strategies, including nitrates, beta blockers, calcium antagonists, and antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic agents, are discussed in conjunction with revascularization procedures such as coronary angioplasty and bypass surgery.

Advances in calcium blocker therapy

Calcium blockers are drugs that interfere with the entry of calcium ions into cells of a variety of tissues. Three calcium blockers, verapamil, nifedipine, and diltiazem, are currently approved for clinical use in the United States and many others are undergoing clinical trials. All calcium blockers share the effect of dilating blood vessels, although some agents are selective dilators of certain vascular beds, such as the coronary or cerebral circulation. There exist major differences among these drugs in their ability to depress myocardial contraction and inhibit cardiac impulse conduction, as well as other properties. The therapeutic actions of the agents in use, as well as the actions of the investigational calcium blockers, have been reviewed. Although calcium blockers are generally well tolerated and have fewer side effects than many alternative drugs, serious adverse effects are possible in certain clinical settings. The clinical indications for these drugs continue to expand and will likely find many uses in surgical patients, especially in the areas of cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, vascular surgery, and general surgery.

Chronic treatment with nifedipine does not change the number of [3H]nitrendipine and [3H]dihydroalprenolol binding sites

Possible receptor changes occurring after withdrawal of chronic nifedipine treatment or chronic propranolol treatment were examined by administering nifedipine (100 mg/kg per day) or propranolol (45 mg/kg per day) to rats for 2 weeks and then withdrawing treatment [3H]Nitrendipine and [3H]DHA binding were measured in membrane fragments of the ventricle. In propranolol-treated rats, 8 h after the last administration, the maximum binding for [3H]DHA was significantly increased from 79.9 +/- 8.0 to 139.8 +/- 12.8 fmol/mg protein (mean +/- S.E.); the dissociation constant was significantly increased from 4.9 +/- 0.7 to 10.7 +/- 1.2 nM. On the other hand, in nifedipine-treated rats, 12 and 48 h after the last administration, [3H]nitrendipine binding and [3H]DHA binding had not changed significantly. These results indicate that the mechanism of the calcium antagonist withdrawal syndrome may be different from that of beta-blocker withdrawal syndrome.

Absence of rebound from diltiazem therapy in Prinzmetal's variant angina

To determine the frequency of rebound anginal symptoms on abrupt withdrawal of calcium channel blocking agents, anginal symptoms were retrospectively examined in patients with Prinzmetal's variant angina abruptly withdrawn from diltiazem therapy as part of the design of a placebo-controlled multiple crossover trial. Rebound was defined as a return of anginal symptoms to levels exceeding those of the pretreatment baseline state. Values for daily frequency of angina were compared (after subtracting corresponding baseline values) between placebo periods following diltiazem periods and placebo periods following placebo periods. No intergroup differences existed between mean changes in daily frequency of angina from baseline value (-0.61 for placebo following diltiazem versus -1.10 for placebo following placebo) (p greater than 0.4). Furthermore, in 13 (28%) of 46 occurrences when placebo followed placebo, daily frequency of angina exceeded baseline value in the immediate 3 day period following placebo compared with 17 (21%) of 80 occurrences when placebo followed diltiazem. There was no increased rebound occurrence comparing high dose (240 mg/day) with low dose (120 mg/day) diltiazem therapy. No significant symptoms such as myocardial infarction or unstable angina occurred after withdrawal of diltiazem or placebo. The lack of difference in rebound after diltiazem or placebo withdrawal was consistent using paired and unpaired analyses. In conclusion, there appears to be no evidence that abrupt withdrawal of therapy with diltiazem results in rebound anginal symptoms.

Safety of acute calcium antagonist withdrawal: studies in patients with unstable angina withdrawn from nifedipine

The acute effects of nifedipine withdrawal were studied in 81 patients with angina at rest who had completed a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of nifedipine versus placebo. Thirty-nine of the 81 patients (group 1) were withdrawn from nifedipine or placebo at the time of coronary artery bypass surgery for uncontrolled angina or left main coronary artery disease. When the patients withdrawn from nifedipine were compared with those withdrawn from placebo, no significant differences were seen in the incidence of hypotension, myocardial infarction, significant arrhythmias or vasopressor or vasodilator requirements during the perioperative period. Forty-two patients (group 2) completed 2 years on a protocol consisting of nitrates and propranolol, in addition to nifedipine or placebo. These patients were hospitalized for a controlled withdrawal of the study drug (nifedipine or placebo), and no significant difference was noted in either exercise performance on serial treadmill testing or the number or duration of episodes of ischemic ST-segment changes during continuous electrocardiographic monitoring. Eight patients continued to experience occasional episodes of angina at rest. Angina at rest recurred during the withdrawal period in 5 of these 8 patients. Four of these 5 patients were withdrawn from nifedipine. Of the 34 stable patients in group 2 who were not experiencing angina at rest before withdrawal, none had angina at rest during the withdrawal study period. Thus, there were no early untoward effects of acute nifedipine withdrawal either in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery or in stable patients on long-term medical therapy. However, patients with persistent symptoms of angina at rest may experience early recurrent ischemia upon withdrawal from nifedipine.