Out-of-hospital automatic cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia

Actuarial incidence and pattern of occurrence of shocks following implantation of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator

The actuarial incidence and pattern of occurrence of shocks were analyzed in 65 patients after implantation of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. During a mean follow-up of 25 +/- 21 months only one patient died suddenly, and this patient had a nonfunctioning device at the time of death. The long-term actuarial risk of death from any cause in the patients who received appropriate shocks was not significantly different than for the entire group. The 1- and 4-year cumulative risk of receiving any shock was 51 +/- 7% and 81 +/- 11%; of receiving an appropriate shock was 33 +/- 7% and 64 +/- 10%; of receiving a spurious shock was 17 +/- 5% and 21 +/- 6%; and of receiving an "indeterminate" shock was 19 +/- 6% and 52 +/- 10%. In 14 patients who were followed for 24 months without receiving an appropriate shock, the actuarial risk of receiving an appropriate shock was 29 +/- 14% during the next 24 months. The mean number of shocks delivered during appropriate episodes was 1.6 +/- 0.9, which was significantly lower than the mean of 4.0 +/- 2.0 shocks during spurious episodes (P less than 0.02). The mean number of shocks during indeterminate episodes was 1.7 +/- 1.5. Our data confirms the efficacy of the implantable defibrillator in preventing sudden death. The majority of patients with this device receive appropriate shocks during long-term follow-up, and the cumulative incidence of appropriate shocks increases steadily for at least 4 years. In contrast, the cumulative incidence of spurious shocks plateaus at about 12 months. Our data suggests that many "indeterminate" shocks actually appear to be appropriate.

Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: patient survival, battery longevity and shock delivery analysis

The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) has been shown to reduce the mortality rate of patients with malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This report describes experience with implantation of 36 automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (AID-B and AID-BR models) in 22 persons over a 44 month patient follow-up period (mean 19.6 months). There were five deaths: two patients died suddenly 22 and 29 months, respectively, after their second implant, one died of congestive heart failure, one died of respiratory failure and one died of catheter sepsis. Although 11 (50%) of the 22 patients never received a countershock for a ventricular tachyarrhythmia and are still alive, the other 11 received one or more spontaneous countershocks. Nine patients (41%) experienced spurious shocks during the follow-up period. Assuming that the first shock for presumed ventricular tachyarrhythmia prevented death, the hypothetical cumulative survival of patients at 42 months would have been 34 +/- 14.1% in the absence of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator rather than the actual survival rate of 59 +/- 16.8%. The cumulative device survival of the 36 AID-B units was 92 +/- 5.62% at 15 months but diminished to 37 +/- 14.4% by 20 months. No unit lasted longer than 22 months. There were 12 battery depletions. The number of shocks emitted did not influence unit longevity. The manufacturer's elective replacement indicator is of uncertain validity. Six units remained active 7 to 17 months after surpassing their replacement indicator. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator prolongs the life of many patients with otherwise intractable arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combined bipolar dual chamber pacing and automatic implantable cardioverter/defibrillator

A 67 year old man with recurrent hypotensive ventricular tachycardia, amiodarone-induced bradyarrhythmias and severe cardiac dysfunction underwent simultaneous implantation of an automatic cardioverter/defibrillator and bipolar atrioventricular (AV) pacemaker. The pacing electrodes were placed epicardially near the right atrial appendage and on the lateral right ventricular wall. The rate detector of the automatic defibrillator was placed epicardially on the posterobasal left ventricular wall. Effective bipolar AV pacing produced no false counting of the heart rate by the automatic cardioverter/defibrillator, and ventricular tachycardia properly inhibited the pacemaker. Long-term follow-up study confirmed the safety of this treatment. With proper precautions, bipolar AV pacing can be safely combined with an automatic cardioverter/defibrillator.