Automatic burst extrastimulus pacemaker to treat recurrent ventricular tachycardia in a patient with mitral valve prolapse: more than 2,000 documented successful tachycardia terminations

Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death: A Systematic Review

Background

The relationship between mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains controversial. In this systematic review, we evaluate the relationship between isolated MVP and SCD to better define a potential high‐risk subtype. In addition, we determine whether premortem parameters could predict SCD in patients with MVP and the incidence of SCD in MVP.

Methods and Results

Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed and Embase for all English literature articles published between 1960 and 2018 regarding MVP and SCD or cardiac arrest. We also identified articles investigating predictors of ventricular arrhythmias or SCD and cohort studies reporting SCD outcomes in MVP. From 2180 citations, there were 79 articles describing 161 cases of MVP with SCD or cardiac arrest. The median age was 30 years and 69% of cases were female. Cardiac arrest occurred during situations of stress in 47% and was caused by ventricular fibrillation in 81%. Premature ventricular complexes on Holter monitoring (92%) were common. Most cases had bileaflet involvement (70%) with redundancy (99%) and nonsevere mitral regurgitation (83%). From 22 articles describing predictors for ventricular arrhythmias or SCD in MVP, leaflet redundancy was the only independent predictor of SCD. The incidence of SCD with MVP was estimated at 217 events per 100 000 person‐years.

Conclusions

Isolated MVP and SCD predominantly affects young females with redundant bileaflet prolapse, with cardiac arrest usually occurring as a result of ventricular arrhythmias. To better understand the complex relationship between MVP and SCD, standardized reporting of clinical, electrophysiological, and cardiac imaging parameters with longitudinal follow‐up is required.

Efficacy of automatic multimodal device therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias as delivered by a new implantable pacing cardioverter-defibrillator. Results of a European multicenter study of 102 implants

BACKGROUND

Third-generation implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are devices designed to treat ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) by means of overdrive pacing, cardioversion, or defibrillation. So far, the efficacy of tiered therapy has been documented only in small series. Therefore, a European multicenter clinical evaluation study of a new tachyarrhythmia control device, the Medtronic PCD pacer-cardioverter-defibrillator with epicardial patch-lead configuration, was undertaken.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report on 102 patients (mean age, 55 +/- 13 years) from 11 European centers. PCD devices implanted between May 1989 and February 1991 were included. The patients suffered from hemodynamically significant ventricular tachyarrhythmias not suppressed by antiarrhythmic drug therapy and unrelated to acute myocardial infarction; one patient had nonsustained VT and severely depressed left ventricular function. Seventy patients had coronary artery disease with old myocardial infarctions, 23 had cardiomyopathies of various etiologies, and nine patients had no detectable heart disease. Mean ejection fraction was 36 +/- 14% (range, 10-76%). Mean intraoperative defibrillation threshold (51 patients) was 10.6 +/- 5.1 J (range, 2-18 J). The documented follow-up ranged from 1 to 21 months (mean, 9.4 +/- 5.8 months), or 79.9 cumulative patient-years. Perioperative mortality was 3.9%. The actuarial survival rate at 12 months was 91%. One sudden arrhythmic death occurred. Sixty patients (58%) received device therapy. Seventeen patients had therapies only for "VF" episodes, 16 patients only for VT, and 28 patients for VT and "VF" episodes. Based on device memory data, 1,235 spontaneous VT episodes were detected and treated in 43 patients. Twelve hundred four of these VT episodes received painless initial antitachycardia pacing therapy, restoring sinus rhythm in 91%. The 108 ongoing episodes received 209 multiple therapeutic attempts. Eighty-five additional overdrive pacing therapies restored sinus rhythm in 30%. Initial ineffective antitachycardia pacing therapies received 51 cardioversion pulses. The success rate was 61%. Seventy-three additional cardioversion pulses were delivered to backup ineffective pacing therapy as well as ineffective secondary cardioversion pulses. Their success rate was only 40%. Two hundred eighty-six spontaneous episodes were detected in 44 patients as "VF." Overall defibrillation efficacy was 97.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The implanted device nearly eliminates sudden arrhythmic death in patients with documented, potentially fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Automatic tiered therapy is highly effective to restore sinus rhythm, provided that an integrated two-zone tachycardia detection algorithm is used, assigning lower tachycardia rates to overdrive pacing and/or cardioversion and higher tachycardia rates to defibrillation. In general, spontaneous VTs can be terminated by automatic overdrive pacing, and painful or disturbing countershock therapies are not required to terminate the majority of spontaneous VT episodes.

Computer simulation of overdrive pacing during atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia

The study used a computer model of cardiac excitation to reproduce atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia and to evaluate the possibility of its termination by overdrive burst pacing. The model simulated activation waves radiating along a one-dimensional circular pathway, the portions of which represented the atrial, AV nodal, His-Purkinje, ventricular, and bypass parts of the tachycardia circuit. The pathway consisted of 289 elements. Only depolarised and resting states of elements were modelled. Differential refractoriness and conduction velocity for each element and the cycle length dependence of AV nodal decremental conduction were introduced. The experiments with the model examined the ability of overdrive 'on-circuit' pacing to terminate the tachycardia in order to determine the relevance of: (a) the coupling interval of the first beat in the burst; (b) the cycle length of the burst; (c) the number of stimuli in the burst; (d) His-Purkinje refractoriness; and (e) the degree of AV nodal decremental conduction. The results suggested that: (A) the general impression of a regular recovery wave and of a regular excitable window moving uniformly along the macro-reentrant circular path is incorrect; (B) the use of overdrive bursts of several stimuli with a short coupling interval has unpredictable effects; (C) the use of faster bursts with a cycle length only slightly shorter than the tachycardia cycle length is more safe (with respect to tachycardia reinitiation) and for certain combinations of the coupling interval and cycle length, prolonged bursts do not reinitiate the tachycardia; (D) the likelihood of tachycardia termination is increased by prolonging the refractoriness of the tachycardia circuit and by reducing AV nodal decremental conduction.

Clinical experience with a new software-based antitachycardia pacemaker for recurrent supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias

The Intermedics Intertach 262-12 tachycardia reversion pulse generator was implanted in 14 patients (six male, eight female, mean age at implantation 45 +/- 16 years) with recurrent symptomatic tachycardias. Six patients had atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia, three patients had orthodromic tachycardia with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, two had circus movement tachycardia via a concealed bypass tract, two had ventricular tachycardia, one patient had atrial flutter. Mean duration of symptoms before implantation was 8 +/- 4 years and mean number of antiarrhythmic drug trials was 3.5 +/- 1. The primary tachycardia response made consisted of autodecremental pacing in one patient, burst pacing in two patients, and adaptive scanning of the initial delay or burst cycle length in eleven patients. The secondary tachycardia response mode consisted of autodecremental pacing in four patients, burst pacing in three patients and burst scanning in four patients. Tachycardia response was automatic in all but one patient with ventricular tachycardia. During a follow-up period of 30.5 +/- 10.6 months, one patient with ventricular tachycardia died from a nonarrhythmic cause. Reinterventions were necessary due to electrode fracture in one patient and due to pacemaker software defect in another one. Two patients underwent surgical cure of their arrhythmia: one patient with atrial flutter and one patient with AV nodal reentry tachycardia, 24 months and 11 months postpacemaker implantation, respectively. Four patients required digitalis to prevent pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Other proarrhythmic effects were not encountered. The pacemaker proved to be a versatile system with reliable tachycardia detection and termination functions. It provided a valuable adjunctive therapy in these selected patients.