Predictors of success for coronary angioplasty performed for acute myocardial infarction

The role and mechanisms of microvascular damage in the ischemic myocardium

Following myocardial ischemic injury, the most effective clinical intervention is timely restoration of blood perfusion to ischemic but viable myocardium to reduce irreversible myocardial necrosis, limit infarct size, and prevent cardiac insufficiency. However, reperfusion itself may exacerbate cell death and myocardial injury, a process commonly referred to as ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, which primarily involves cardiomyocytes and cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs) and is characterized by myocardial stunning, microvascular damage (MVD), reperfusion arrhythmia, and lethal reperfusion injury. MVD caused by I/R has been a neglected problem compared to myocardial injury. Clinically, the incidence of microvascular angina and/or no-reflow due to ineffective coronary perfusion accounts for 5-50% in patients after acute revascularization. MVD limiting drug diffusion into injured myocardium, is strongly associated with the development of heart failure. CMECs account for > 60% of the cardiac cellular components, and their role in myocardial I/R injury cannot be ignored. There are many studies on microvascular obstruction, but few studies on microvascular leakage, which may be mainly due to the lack of corresponding detection methods. In this review, we summarize the clinical manifestations, related mechanisms of MVD during myocardial I/R, laboratory and clinical examination means, as well as the research progress on potential therapies for MVD in recent years. Better understanding the characteristics and risk factors of MVD in patients after hemodynamic reconstruction is of great significance for managing MVD, preventing heart failure and improving patient prognosis.

Angiographic predictors of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with radiation associated coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

To determine procedural predictors of long-term outcomes for patients with radiation associated coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Patients who develop CAD after external beam radiation therapy (XRT) for cancer are at high-risk for adverse events following PCI. It is unknown if specific angiographic features can predict outcomes in this population.

METHODS

This is an observational study of 157 patients with malignancy who received XRT prior to PCI. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs; all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or stroke) were compared across patient characteristics over time with the Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier's analyses.

RESULTS

During follow-up of 5.4 ± 4.5 years, 91 (58%) patients had MACCE. On Kaplan-Meier's analysis of angiographic characteristics, MACCE was more frequent in patients with at least moderate target vessel calcification (P = 0.023), ostial stenosis (P = 0.049), target vessel diameter ≥ 3.0 mm (P = 0.018), a SYNTAX score ≥ the median of 11 (P = 0.014), or bare metal stenting (BMS)/balloon angioplasty (BA) compared to drug-eluting stenting (DES) (P = 0.006). Cardiac death was more frequent in patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 11 (P = 0.028) or BMS (P = 0.043). After multivariable adjustment for both angiographic and clinical characteristics, independent predictors of MACCE were BMS placement (P = 0.013), chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3 (P = 0.019), New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class ≥3 (P = 0.034), and SYNTAX score ≥ 11 (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients previously exposed to XRT treated with PCI, independent angiographic predictors of MACCE include SYNTAX score ≥ 11 and BMS placement, suggestive that DES should be preferred in this population.

The effects of facilitated primary PCI by guide wire on procedural and clinical outcomes in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Reperfusion of the infarct related artery (IRA) prior to PCI is prognostically important in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Reperfusion is either achieved spontaneously, facilitated by GP IIb/ IIIa inhibitors, or mechanically by crossing the guide wire beyond the lesion. In order to test the hypothesis that a visible coronary anatomy is independently associated with procedural and clinical outcomes, we evaluated the frequency and prognostic impact of guide wire facilitated reperfusion of the IRA before primary PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 311 consecutive patients with successful primary PCI for STEMI (TIMI grade > or =2 flow) within 12 h after onset of symptoms. Among these, 90 patients (28.9%) had a spontaneously reperfused IRA on initial angiogram, 56 patients (18.0%) achieved reperfusion after crossing of the guide wire, and 165 patients (53.1%) successful reperfusion only after PCI. Variables associated with successful guide wire facilitated reperfusion were younger age, no history of arterial hypertension, active smoking status, negative cardiac troponin T on admission, and an infarct in the territory of the right coronary artery. Patients with spontaneous reperfusion or reperfusion after crossing of the guide wire required less fluoroscopic time and less contrast material during angiography and had higher procedural success rates (TIMI grade 3 flow 91.1 vs 79.4%, p=0.048) than patients without initial reperfusion. In addition, patients with reperfusion after crossing the lesion with the guide wire had lower mortality rates at 30 days (3.6 vs 9.1%) and after a median of 16 months (3.6 vs 13.9%, p=0.03) than those with reperfusion after PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

Reperfusion of an occluded IRA by crossing the guide wire is associated with higher procedural success rates and better outcomes. Better roadmapping and device selection represent potential reasons but the exact mechanism for these benefits is still illusive.

Provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in a randomized investigation of bivalirudin versus heparin plus planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention: predictors and outcome in the Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial

BACKGROUND

The REPLACE-2 trial demonstrated the noninferiority of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) blockade as compared with heparin plus planned GPIIb/IIIa blockade among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization. Provisional drug was used in 374 (6%) of the 6010 patients. We sought to analyze the predictors for provisional drug use and to assess the outcomes in this cohort.

METHODS

Outcome among the 5.2% of patients in the heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa blockade group and the 7.2% of patients in the bivalirudin group who received provisional placebo or GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor, respectively, was compared against patients without provisional drug use and between randomized arms. Multivariate models identified predictors of provisional drug use and outcome at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

Myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and bleeding events occurred more frequently among patients who required provisional drug than those who did not, but there were no differences in 1-year mortality. Ischemic and hemorrhagic end points occurred at similar rates among patients receiving provisional drug in either the heparin plus GPIIb/IIIa group compared with the bivalirudin group. Independent predictors of provisional drug use were randomization to bivalirudin, recent infarction, multilesion intervention, impaired pretreatment coronary flow, and lesion complexity. Provisional drug use, but not randomization to bivalirudin, independently predicted 30-day and 6-month ischemic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Provisional administration of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor is associated with more frequent ischemic and bleeding events, reflecting the procedural complications that led to the use of provisional drug. The proportion of bivalirudin-treated patients who will require provisional GPIIb/IIIa blockade, however, is not large enough to have a significant deleterious impact on the overall incidence of ischemic end points or to invalidate the strategy of bivalirudin plus provisional GPIIb/IIIa blockade.

Nitric oxide and cardioprotection during ischemia-reperfusion

Coronary artery reperfusion is widely used to restore blood flow in acute myocardial infarction and limit its progression. However, reperfusion of ischemic myocardium results in reperfusion injury and persistent ventricular dysfunction even when achieved after brief periods of ischemia. Normally, small amounts of nitric oxide (NO) generated by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) regulates vascular tone. Ischemia-reperfusion triggers the release of oxygen free radicals (OFRs) and a cascade involving endothelial dysfunction, decreased eNOS and NO, neutrophil activation, increased cytokines and more OFRs, increased inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and marked increase in NO, excess peroxynitrite formation, and myocardial injury. Low doses of NO appear to be beneficial and high doses harmful in ischemia-reperfusion. eNOS knock-out mice confirm that eNOS-derived NO is cardioprotective in ischemia-reperfusion. iNOS overexpression increases peroxynitrite but did not cause severe dysfunction. Increased angiotensin II (AngII) after ischemia-reperfusion inactivates NO, forms peroxynitrite and produces cardiotoxic effects. Beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition and AngII type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockade after ischemia-reperfusion are partly mediated through AngII type 2 (AT(2)) receptor stimulation, increased bradykinin and NO. Interventions that enhance NO availability by increasing eNOS might be beneficial after ischemia-reperfusion.

Absence of preinfarction angina is associated with a risk of no-reflow phenomenon after primary coronary angioplasty for a first anterior wall acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

No-reflow phenomenon after primary coronary angioplasty is associated with poorer left ventricular (LV) function and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical significance of preinfarction angina in the no-reflow phenomenon.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 40 patients with first anterior AMI were examined. All patients underwent primary balloon angioplasty or stenting within 12 h of the onset of AMI. No-reflow, defined as TIMI grade 2 flow or less without residual stenosis after angioplasty, was observed in 15 patients. Patients with no-reflow were older (67+/-9 vs. 58+/-10 years, P=0.006) and had a lower incidence of preinfarction angina (7% vs. 48%, P=0.01) than those without no-reflow. Patients with no-reflow had poorer LV function at predischarge and a higher incidence of pump failure, LV aneurysm, malignant ventricular arrhythmias or cardiac death during the hospital course in association with higher peak serum C-reactive protein levels (12.7+/-8.0 vs. 7.1+/-5.5 mg/dl, P=0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that the absence of preinfarction angina was a major independent determinant of no-reflow (RR=17.1, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of preinfarction angina is more frequently observed in patients with no-reflow. The beneficial effect of preinfarction angina on LV function may be explained, at least in part, by prevention of no-reflow after reperfusion.

[Coronary angioplasty in the acute myocardial infarction: in which patients is it less likely to obtain an adequate coronary reperfusion?]

INTRODUCTION

In patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty, the inability to achieve successful coronary reperfusion is associated with higher mortality. The objective of the study was to identify which characteristics may predict a lower angiographic success rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with coronary angioplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population is constituted by the 790 patients with acute myocardial infarction that were treated with angioplasty within the 12 hours after the onset of symptoms from 1991 to 1999 at our institution. A successful angiographic result was considered in presence of a residual stenosis < 50% and a TIMI flow 2 or 3 after the procedure.

RESULTS

A successful angiographic result and a final TIMI 3 flow were achieved in 736 (93.2%) and 652 (82.5%) patients, respectively. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with angiographic failure than in those with angiographic successful result (48 vs. 10%; p < 0.01). Age under 65 (91 vs. 95%; p = 0.02), non smoking (90 vs. 96%; p < 0,01), previous infarction (87 vs. 94%; p < 0.01), angioplasty after failed thrombolysis (83 vs. 94%; p = 0. 02), cardiogenic shock (80 vs. 95%; p < 0.01), undetermined location (67 vs. 93%; p < 0.01), non-inferior location (92 vs. 96%; p = 0.04), left bundle branch block (64 vs. 94%; p < 0.01), multivessel disease (91 vs. 95%; p = 0.02), left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.40 (89 vs. 97%; p < 0.01), no utilization of coronary stenting (90 vs. 96%; p < 0.01), and use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation pump (82 vs. 95%; p < 0.01) were associated with a lower angiographic success rate. In the multivariable analysis, the following were independent predictors for angiographic failure: left bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR], 12.95; CI 95%, 3.00-53.90), cardiogenic shock (OR, 4.20; CI 95%, 1.95-8.75), no utilization of coronary stent (OR, 3.44; CI 95%, 1.71-7.37), and previous infarction (OR, 2.82; CI 95%, 1.29-5.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary angioplasty allows a successful coronary recanalization in most patients with acute myocardial infarction. Some basic characteristics, however, may identify some subsets in which a successful angiographic result may be more difficult to obtain.

[Aspiration of large intracoronary thrombus after apparently successful angioplasty. Therapeutic implications]

We present a case in which, after performing an optimal angioplasty after an acute myocardial infarction with intracoronary thrombus, normal coronary flow was not achieved. After aspirating through the guiding catheter we obtained a large thrombus that the histopathologic study confirmed as a recent thrombus and, subsequently, normal flow was reestablished. The procedure was completed with a successful intracoronary stent implantation, with an uneventful clinical course. The therapeutic and diagnostic implications of this case are discussed.

The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: current practice and future trends

The goal of therapy in acute myocardial infarction is complete and timely restoration of coronary blood flow. Current strategies for reperfusion fail to achieve ideal results and resolution of ischemia in all patients. The platelet plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of an acute myocardial infarction, and antiplatelet therapy has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. The final common pathway for platelet activation and aggregation in acute myocardial infarction is the activation of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor. Newer reperfusion strategies target the GP IIb/IIIa receptor, thereby preventing the prothrombotic effects of platelets in an acute myocardial infarction. In the past decade, several strategies targeting the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been evaluated. GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been shown to improve angiographic Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow rates when used as reperfusion therapy given with heparin and aspirin as compared with heparin and aspirin alone. When GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are used with full-dose fibrinolytics, early studies have suggested a trend toward more rapid and more complete reperfusion in an acute myocardial infarction. Later trials have examined the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in conjunction with reduced-dose fibrinolytics. Results from TIMI 14 and Global Use of Strategies to Open occluded arteries-IV pilot trials support the use of combination therapy with reduced- dose fibrinolytics and the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab. Given the promising role of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy in acute myocardial infarction, investigators questioned the need for concomitant antithrombin therapy. However, data from several investigations suggest that antithrombin therapy is required when GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors are used with fibrinolytics, although it appears that the dose of heparin may be reduced. Finally, recent investigations have addressed the safety and efficacy of facilitated early percutaneous intervention. In this strategy, patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction are treated with reduced-dose fibrinolytics and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and are taken to the interventional cardiac catheterization laboratory within the first 60 minutes of therapy.

[Therapy of acute myocardial infarct--primary PTCA or thrombolysis?]

Since reperfusion of the infarct-related coronary artery has been established as a mainstay in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) mechanical recanalization by direct angioplasty has been used as an alternative to the standard treatment with thrombolysis. Direct PTCA is more efficient than thrombolysis in terms of reperfusion rates, whereas thrombolysis is more readily available. Thrombolysis reduces mortality from AMI by approximately 25%. The clinical efficacy is strongly time-dependent, and treatment within the first hour of AMI improves survival by nearly 50% by preventing transmural infarction in a significant proportion of the patients. The disadvantage of thrombolysis is its limited efficacy in terms of rapid, complete and sustained patency of the infarct vessel yielding optimal results in only 50% of the patients. Direct PTCA is generally agreed to be more efficient to recanalize the infarct vessel, but its clinical advantage remains controversial. The first randomized studies of direct PTCA in AMI from highly specialized centers in selected patients reported success rates of coronary reperfusion up to 97% resulting in a trend to less death and reinfarction, but the differences were significant only in a metaanalysis of these small studies. The real world of direct PTCA has been depicted by a large registry in Germany of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte (ALKK) now including more than 4,000 direct PTCA-procedures since 1994. In this registry, the success rate of direct PTCA was 87% as defined by a final TIMI-grade 3 perfusion of the infarct vessel which is close to the data of the MITI-registry and the GUSTO IIb study. Failed PTCA was associated with an exceptionally high mortality rate of 36% confirming earlier observational reports. The non-randomized comparison of thrombolysis and direct PTCA in the MITI-registry showed no differene in survival or reinfarction rates, and the randomized GUSTO IIb substudy of direct PTCA versus front-loaded alteplase showed a small advantage in death and reinfarction rates at 30 days which dissipated over time leaving no significant clinical advantage of direct PTCA over thrombolysis at 6 months. Thus, in myocardial infarction in general the advantage of direct PTCA over thrombolysis is at best minimal. The reason is very probably the longer time lag until the procedure is started, the lower success rate as compared to the first reports of some specialized centers, and the clearly negative impact of failed PTCA on survival. Moreover, the immediate success of direct PTCA seems to be overestimated by the operator as demonstrated by comparison of central and local estimates of the TIMI flow rates in GUSTO IIb. Improvements of direct PTCA in AMI might be possible by coronary stenting which has markedly increased to more than 60% during the last year in the ALKK-registry. This was accompanied by a slight decrease in death and reinfarction rates. Further improvements can be expected from GP IIb/IIIa platelet antagonists which are under clinical investigation. It has been claimed, that in cardiogenic shock direct PTCA is more effective than thrombolysis. This hypothesis is based on comparison of failed versus successful PTCA-attempts, but this comparison is not valid since failed procedures clearly increase mortality. In the GUSTO-1 study patients with cardiogenic shock had lower mortality with than without an early coronary angiogram. This survival advantage, however, was independent of revascularization since only half of the patients with an early angiogram had PTCA. The same was observed in the International Shock Registry, reflecting significant selection bias in that patients in relatively better condition will be taken to the cathlab whereas apparently hopeless cases will not. In the ALKK-registry half of the patients in cardiogenic shock died after direct PTCA casting doubt on the presumed high clinical efficacy of this strategy. (ABST

Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to identify and define a minimum set of variables for interventional cardiology that carried the most statistical weight for predicting adverse outcomes. Though "gaming" cannot be completely avoided, variables were to be as objective as possible and reproducible and had to be predictive of outcome in current databases.

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions depend on patient risk characteristics and disease severity and acuity. Comparing results of interventions has been difficult because definitions of similar variables differ in databases, and variables are not uniformly tracked. Identifying the best predictor variables and standardizing their definitions are a first step in developing a universal stratification instrument.

METHODS

A list of empirically derived variables was first tested in eight cardiac databases (158,273 cases). Three end points (in-hospital death, in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery, Q wave myocardial infarction) were chosen for analysis. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to quantify the predictive value of the variable in each database. The variables were then defined by consensus by a panel of experts.

RESULTS

In all databases patient demographics were similar, but disease severity varied greatly. The most powerful predictors of adverse outcome were measures of hemodynamic instability, disease severity, demographics and comorbid conditions in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis identified 29 variables that have the strongest statistical association with adverse outcomes after coronary interventions. These variables were also objectively defined. Incorporation of these variables into every cardiac dataset will provide uniform standards for data collected. Comparisons of outcomes among physicians, institutions and databases will therefore be more meaningful.

[Results of primary angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease]

INTRODUCTION

In patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty, multivessel disease is associated with a higher mortality. However, if higher mortality is simply due to a higher prevalence of cardiogenic shock or if multivessel disease is an independent risk factor remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To study if multivessel disease constitute an independent prognostic factor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty, and to ascertain possible mechanisms contributing to the worse prognosis found in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between august 1991 and october 1996, 312 patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated with primary angioplasty in our center. Characteristics and in-hospital outcome of patients with or without multivessel disease were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with multivessel disease (n = 158; 51%) were older (64 +/- 11 vs 61 +/- 13 years; p = 0.017), less often smokers (60% vs. 76%; p = 0.006) and had a higher prevalence of diabetes (35% vs. 20%; p = 0.007), hypertension (54% vs. 39%; p = 0.012), prior acute myocardial infarction (29% vs. 5%; p < 0.001), prior coronary bypass (2% vs. 0%; p = 0.042) and Killip class IV at admission (19% vs. 8%; p < 0.001). Angiographic success rate was not different in patients with or without multivessel disease (89% vs. 92%; NS). Patients with multivessel disease had a higher in-hospital mortality (21% vs. 7%; p < 0.001), need of revascularization (17% vs. 3%; p < 0.001) and incidence of severe mitral regurgitation, (5% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), second or third atrioventricular blockade (10% vs. 1%; p < 0.001) and severe bleeding (4% vs. 1%; p = 0.089). After excluding patients with Killip class III or IV at admission, mortality was also higher in patients with multivessel disease (9% vs. 2%; p = 0.009). Multivariate analysis showed the following independent risk factors for mortality: age > 65 years, Killip class IV and multivessel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty, multivessel disease is associated with higher mortality. This is due not only to a higher prevalence of cardiogenic shock at admission, but also to a worse baseline profile, a higher incidence of complications and a more frequent need of revascularization.

Predictors of short term clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

Coronary angioplasty is an effective method to achieve myocardial reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We reviewed our experience in 132 patients (pts) who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of a totally occluded infarct-related artery (IRA) within 24 h after the onset of symptoms (mean delay 10 +/- 7 h), in order to identify the predictors of primary success and of major complications. PTCA was successfully performed in 113 patients (86%). Failure without complications occurred in 12 patients (8.4%); untoward events (death and emergency CABG) occurred in seven patients (5.3%). Pts in the failure group were more likely to have cardiogenic shock (53 vs. 8.8%, P < .0005), longer time to reperfusion (15 +/- 6 vs. 9 +/- 6 h, P < .0005), lower ejection fraction (EF) (42 +/- 16 vs. 54 +/- 12%, P < .0005), multivessel disease (74 vs. 43%, P < .03), and a smaller IRA diameter (2.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.6 mm, P < .03). Sex, age, previous bypass surgery, previous thrombolytic treatment, IRA, and infarct location were similar in both groups. Absence of cardiogenic shock (P < .0001), decreasing time to reperfusion (P < .005) and increasing EF (P < .02) were independent predictors of successful PTCA. Presence of cardiogenic shock (P < .0001) and decreasing EF (< .05) were independent predictors of untoward events. Repeat angiography was performed 24 h after the procedure in the success group. Angiographic deterioration (stenosis > or = 50% and/or TIMI flow grade < or = 1) was present in 18 pts (16%), among whose 5 pts (4.4%) had re-occlusion of the IRA. Pts with early angiographic deterioration were more likely to have a lower IRA diameter (2.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.6 mm, P < .02).

CONCLUSION

Emergency PTCA is an effective method for establishing reperfusion in AMI. Pts with high-risk baseline characteristics show the highest rate of untoward events, but are the most likely to benefit from aggressive reperfusion therapy.

Coronary angioplasty in the patient with acute myocardial infarction

In patients with acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) may be used (1) to restore antegrade flow in the infarct artery (so called "primary" PTCA) instead of thrombolytic therapy, (2) to establish antegrade coronary flow after unsuccessful thrombolytic therapy (so called "rescue" or "salvage" PTCA), and (3) to reduce the residual infarct artery stenosis after successful thrombolysis. This review examines the prospective, randomized studies that have addressed the use of PTCA for each of these purposes. In selected circumstances, PTCA is a reasonable alternative to thrombolytic therapy in patients with evolving or recent Q-wave myocardial infarction. In those patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, PTCA may be the preferred treatment. After thrombolytic therapy, the use of PTCA in the absence of spontaneous or provocable ischemia offers no benefit with regard to left ventricular function or survival. In this circumstance, its use is associated with an excessive risk of bleeding, transfusions, and emergent coronary artery bypass surgery when performed within hours of infarction.

Tailored thrombolytic therapy. A perspective

BACKGROUND

In contrast with current standard regimens, it seems more appropriate to tailor thrombolytic therapy to individual patient characteristics. A proposed model for such tailored therapy is based on individual assessment of benefits and risks of thrombolytic therapy, taking into account the response of individual patients to the therapy given.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Potential benefits of thrombolysis in individual patients can be predicted by use of demographic patient characteristics (age, sex, history of previous infarction) together with indicators of the ischemic area at risk (total ST segment deviation) and treatment delay. Using these parameters, the number of "lives saved" by thrombolytic therapy for specific patient characteristics can be estimated. Similarly, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage during thrombolytic therapy can be estimated from the patient's age, blood pressure at admission, and body weight. Depending on benefit/risk estimates, a choice can be made between regimens with high, medium, or modest thrombolytic efficacy. Continuous multilead ECG ischemia monitoring and rapid assays of myocardial proteins in serum can be used to assess the occurrence or absence of reperfusion and to detect signs of reocclusion. Such data help to decide whether thrombolytic therapy should be continued or intensified or might be discontinued in individual patients before the total standard dose has been administered. Such tailored reduction of the total thrombolytic dose will reduce the risk for bleeding complications in some of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of tailoring thrombolytic therapy and the models presented for benefit/risk assessment should be tested in clinical studies and may subsequently help the physician to select the optimal approach in individual patients.

Outcome of urgent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: comparison of single-vessel versus multivessel coronary artery disease

Despite recent clinical trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in acute myocardial infarction, specific groups of patients that may benefit from adjunctive or alternative therapy have yet to be adequately characterized. The in-hospital outcome of 151 consecutive patients treated for acute myocardial infarction with urgent PTCA of the infarct-related artery was studied to identify a subgroup of patients at high risk. Patients were divided into two groups based on the angiographic presence of either single-vessel (n = 86) or multivessel (n = 65) coronary artery disease. Despite PTCA of only the infarct-related artery and similar baseline clinical characteristics such as age, peak serum creatine kinase concentration, left ventricular ejection fraction, and time from the onset of chest pain to arrival at the hospital, the group with multivessel disease had a lower rate of successful angioplasty (75% vs 92%, p < 0.005), with higher incidences of persistent total occlusion of the infarct-related artery (14% vs 3%, p < 0.02) and procedural complications during PTCA (28% vs 13%, p < or = 0.02), and were more likely to have multiple complications (12% vs 1%, p < 0.004). In addition, the group with multivessel disease had a higher rate of urgent (< or = 24 hours) coronary artery bypass graft surgery (13% vs 2%, p < 0.05) and a trend toward a higher in-hospital mortality rate (6% vs 1%, p < or = 0.17). By stepwise logistic regression, only the presence of single-vessel versus multivessel disease was predictive of PTCA success (p < 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thrombolytic therapy: adjuvant mechanical intervention for acute myocardial infarction

Following successful pharmacologic thrombolysis, early coronary angiography frequently shows a tight residual stenosis in the infarct-related artery at the site of recent occlusion. Approaches to the management of the residual stenosis have undergone a gradual evolution from an aggressive strategy of immediate balloon dilation to a more conservative approach. Randomized, controlled trials have indicated that immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is associated with no greater recovery in regional or global left ventricular function, and a tendency toward an increased incidence of complications, including the need for emergency coronary artery surgery and blood transfusion. The role of immediate rescue PTCA for failed thrombolysis has not been as rigorously investigated, but selected patients, including those with evidence of ongoing myocardial ischemia or hemodynamic instability, may benefit from this approach. A major source of current controversy is the value of routine coronary angiography after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Two carefully conducted trials have indicated that a conservative strategy of clinically indicated, predischarge cardiac catheterization may be associated with an increased need for readmission and late, elective cardiac catheterization when compared with a more invasive strategy of routine coronary angiography, but that the conservative approach is not associated with an increased incidence of death or reinfarction. Provision was not made in these studies, however, for evaluating the positive economic and psychologic impact of early coronary angiography, early hospital discharge, and early return to work of patients with a favorable postinfarction prognosis. It is concluded that early mechanical revascularization following thrombolysis should be considered for ongoing myocardial ischemia, but should otherwise be deferred pending the results of predischarge functional studies. For most patients, routine coronary angiography is likely to remain an important diagnostic tool and an integral component of the management of the convalescent phase of acute myocardial infarction.

Coronary angioplasty performed within the thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction II study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of the infarct-related artery was performed within 42 days of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) administration in 1,414 of the 3,534 patients who participated in the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II study. Primary angiographic success was obtained in 88.7%, with bypass surgery within 24 hours in 3.3% and death within 24 hours in 0.7% of patients. By 1 year, 25.1% of the 1,414 patients had sustained one or more adverse outcomes including death (3.6%), reinfarction (8.4%), or the need for further revascularization (20%).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Despite these generally favorable results, multivariate testing identified several anatomic and clinical subgroups as having an increased risk ratio (RR) for adverse outcome: Unsuccessful PTCA was more common in patients undergoing protocol-assigned PTCA within 2 hours of rt-PA administration (RR, 2.7; p less than 0.001) and in patients over age 70 years (RR, 1.7; p = 0.034). The need for further revascularization within 1 year was increased in the 30.4% of patients with multivessel disease (RR, 2.5; p less than 0.001), patients with prior angina (RR, 1.4; p less than 0.006), or those undergoing ischemia-driven PTCA within 15 hours of rt-PA administration (RR, 1.7; p = 0.022). The risk of death or recurrent infarction within 1 year was increased by the presence of multivessel disease (RR, 1.6; p = 0.007) or prior angina (RR, 1.5; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

These observations do not necessarily apply to patients undergoing primary PTCA (or PTCA after other thrombolytic agents); however, they do offer a unique yardstick against which to evaluate the results of PTCA in myocardial infarction.

Outcomes of direct coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in candidates and non-candidates for thrombolytic therapy

Coronary angioplasty without prior thrombolytic therapy was performed in 383 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they were candidates or non-candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Patients were not considered thrombolytic candidates if they: (1) presented in cardiogenic shock, (2) were greater than or equal to 75 years of age, (3) had had coronary artery bypass surgery or, (4) had a reperfusion time of greater than 6 hours. Thrombolytic and nonthrombolytic candidates had similar rates of reperfusion (92 vs 88%), nonfatal reinfarction (6.0 vs 5.9%) and recurrent myocardial ischemia (1.8 vs 0%). Thrombolytic candidates had a lower mortality rate (3.9 vs 24%, p less than 0.0001) and a lower incidence of bleeding (4.6 vs 10.9%, p less than 0.05). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up angiography was 4.4% in thrombolytic and 10.5% in nonthrombolytic candidates (p less than 0.002). Ejection fraction improved most in patients with anterior wall AMI (7.7% in thrombolytic candidates, 15.1% in nonthrombolytic candidates) and in patients with reperfusion times greater than 6 hours (14.2%). These outcomes suggest that direct coronary angioplasty is a viable alternative method of reperfusion in patients with AMI who are candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Nonthrombolytic candidates are a high-risk group of patients. Direct coronary angioplasty may be beneficial in certain subgroups, especially for patients in cardiogenic shock and for patients presenting greater than 6 hours after the onset of chest pain with evidence of ongoing ischemia.

Reasons for the lack of benefit of immediate angioplasty during recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a regional wall motion analysis. European Cooperative Study Group

Regional ventricular wall motion analysis utilizing three different methods was performed on predischarge left ventriculograms from 291 of 367 patients enrolled in a randomized trial of single chain recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), aspirin and heparin with and without immediate angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction. With univariate analysis, no difference in regional wall motion variables between the two treatment groups was observed. However, with individual baseline risk assessment by multivariate linear regression analysis using baseline characteristics known to be related to left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy or outcome of coronary angioplasty, or both, an excess of high risk patients in the invasive treatment group was detected. To adjust for this unequal distribution of baseline risk, multivariate linear regression analysis was performed. No benefit of immediate coronary angioplasty was observed after adjustment. Reocclusion or reinfarction, or both, occurred more frequently in the invasive than in the noninvasive treatment group (18% versus 13%, respectively). Among patients with a patent infarct-related vessel on angiography between days 10 and 22 and without reinfarction before angiography, there was a trend toward benefit from the invasive strategy, indicating that reocclusion and reinfarction might be responsible for the lack of benefit of the invasive strategy. This implies that immediate coronary angioplasty may be beneficial in selected patients, provided that these complications can be prevented.

Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy: differences between primary atheromatous and restenosis lesions and influence of subintimal tissue resection

Rates of restenosis were evaluated in 70 patients (74 lesions) after successful directional coronary atherectomy. The extent of vascular tissue resection was correlated with restenosis rates for coronary (n = 59) and vein bypass graft (n = 15) lesions. After 6 months, the overall restenosis rate was 50% (37 of 74 lesions); it was 42% (15 of 36 lesions) when intima alone was resected, 50% (7 of 14 lesions) when media was resected and 63% (15 of 24 lesions) when adventitia was resected. Subintimal tissue resection increased the restenosis rate for vein grafts (43% with intimal resection versus 100% with subintimal resection, p = 0.01) but not for coronary arteries (50% versus 48%). There was no overall difference in restenosis rates after atherectomy between primary lesions and restenosis lesions that occurred after balloon angioplasty (46% versus 54%). Among postballoon angioplasty restenosis lesions, a higher rate of restenosis after atherectomy was found with subintimal than with intimal resection (78% versus 32%, p = 0.01). Tissues from patients undergoing a second atherectomy for restenosis after initial atherectomy (n = 8) demonstrated neointimal hyperplasia that appeared histologically identical to restenotic tissue developing after balloon angioplasty (n = 37). These data suggest that the cellular response to directional coronary atherectomy is characterized by neointimal proliferation similar to that which may develop after balloon angioplasty. The extent of fibrous hyperplasia appears to be related to the depth of tissue resection in vein graft lesions and coronary artery restenosis lesions that occur after balloon angioplasty but not in primary atheromatous coronary artery lesions.

Results of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease

The influence of multivessel coronary artery disease on the outcome of reperfusion therapy for myocardial infarction has not been fully characterized. Direct coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy was performed during evolving myocardial infarction in 285 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease at 5.2 +/- 4.2 h after the onset of chest pain. Two vessel disease was present in 163 patients (57%) and three vessel disease in 122 (43%). An anterior infarct was present in 123 patients (43%), cardiogenic shock in 33 (12%) and age greater than or equal to 70 years in 59 (21%). Angioplasty of the infarct-related vessel was successful in 256 patients (90%), including 92% with two vessel and 88% with three vessel disease (p = NS). Emergency bypass surgery was needed in six patients (2%). In-hospital death occurred in 33 patients (12%), including 13 with two vessel and 20 with three vessel disease (p less than 0.05). The mortality rate was only 4% in the subgroup of 101 patients who met entry criteria for thrombolytic trials. The in-hospital mortality rate was 45% in patients in shock and 7% in patients not in shock (p less than 0.01). Logistic regression analysis identified shock and age greater than or equal to 70 years as independently associated with in-hospital death. In 135 patients who underwent predischarge left ventriculography, global ejection fraction increased from 50% to 57% (p less than 0.001) and regional wall motion in the infarct zone improved in 59% of patients. Follow-up data were available in 251 patients (99%) at a mean of 35 +/- 19 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Coronary lesion morphology in acute myocardial infarction: demonstration of early remodeling after streptokinase treatment

Coronary lesion morphology was analyzed in 72 patients 1 to 8 days after streptokinase treatment for acute myocardial infarction and compared with lesion morphology in a control group of 24 patients with stable angina. In the streptokinase group the infarct-related artery was patent in 55 patients (76%). Compared with stenoses in the stable angina group, there were no differences in the stenosis length, severity, calcification or in the proportion located at an acute bend or at a branch point. However, lesions in the streptokinase group were more often irregular (p less than 0.005) and eccentric (p less than 0.01), had a shoulder (p less than 0.0001), globular filling defects (p less than 0.01), linear filling defects (p less than 0.00005) and contrast staining (p less than 0.05). Plaque ulceration index was higher in the streptokinase than in the stable angina group (6.2 +/- 7.9 versus 3.5 +/- 3.4, p less than 0.001). Of the 72 streptokinase-treated patients, 35 were maintained on heparin infusion until angioplasty 2 to 10 days later. At repeat angiography before angioplasty, globular lesion filling defects seen in eight patients had disappeared, whereas linear filling defects persisted in 7 of 14 cases. Fewer lesions were irregular (p less than 0.0001) and the ulceration index decreased from 7.4 +/- 10.4 to 3.0 +/- 1.6 (p less than 0.001). These data show that the lesion in the infarct-related artery after streptokinase treatment is irregular and often associated with filling defects, perhaps corresponding to plaque fissuring and intraluminal thrombosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fate of patients with acute myocardial infarction with patency of the infarct-related vessel achieved with successful thrombolysis versus rescue angioplasty

Patients with failure of infarct-related artery recanalization after thrombolytic therapy have a poor clinical outcome. These patients have been considered for rescue angioplasty 90 min after thrombolytic therapy at the time of emergency catheterization in the course of five Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) trials. The outcome of 776 patients with patent infarct-related vessels after emergency catheterization was analyzed--607 with thrombolysis-mediated patency of the infarct-related vessel and 169 with patency achieved by angioplasty. Baseline characteristics of the thrombolysis and angioplasty patency groups were similar except for a higher acute left ventricular ejection fraction (51.3% versus 48.2%) in the thrombolysis group (p = 0.003). Seven to 10 day left ventricular ejection fraction was higher (52.3% versus 48.1%), infarct zone functional recovery was greater (0.44 versus 0.21 standard deviation/chord, or 18% versus 7%, p = 0.001) and reocclusion was less (11% versus 21%) in the thrombolysis compared with the angioplasty group. Despite these differences, angioplasty patency was associated with the same low in-hospital mortality rate (5.9% versus 4.6%) and long-term mortality rate (3% versus 2%) as thrombolysis patency. Reocclusion adversely affected the mortality rate and ventricular functional recovery. Technical failure of rescue angioplasty was associated with a much higher mortality rate than was technical success (39.1% versus 5.9%). Thrombolysis patency was preferable to angioplasty patency after thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, but both were associated with the same low in-hospital and long-term mortality rates, suggesting that rescue angioplasty is beneficial in some patients with failure of infarct-related artery recanalization after thrombolytic therapy.

Update on mechanical intervention in acute myocardial infarction

The role of pharmacologic interventions in acute myocardial infarction (i.e., a combination of intravenous nitroglycerin, intravenous beta-blocker, oral aspirin, and intravenous thrombolysis), has become more standardized, whereas the role of mechanical intervention remains to be defined. Mechanical intervention includes percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass grafting. The number of carefully controlled, randomized trials is limited, particularly with surgery. Nevertheless, in optimal circumstances, when performed within the first few hours of myocardial infarction, surgery can be beneficial in reducing mortality, especially with anterior location of infarct. Surgery may not prevent reinfarction. However, the results of nonrandomized surgical trials done 10 years ago are difficult to compare with modern-day treatment of myocardial infarction with the availability of new agents and PTCA. Angioplasty can be performed safely in the acute phase of myocardial infarction but may not be the ideal choice for all patients. The results may be more optimal if performed when the patient is stable. Clinical factors associated with favorable and unfavorable outcomes have been identified. Mortality is not significantly affected by early versus late PTCA. Certain selected patients benefit from PTCA, particularly those in cardiogenic shock, in whom PTCA has made a dramatic improvement in outcome. To achieve maximal benefit, intervention should be performed early, within the first hours of symptoms. Further well-designed studies may help clarify the role mechanical techniques will play in future combinations of interventional therapy.

Computerized tabulation of cine coronary angiograms. Its implication for results of randomized trials

The quality of cine angiography is excellent in our days, and as a consequence some of the pitfalls encountered in previous randomized trials are not currently present. An example can be found in the CASS analysis of the reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading by the Quality Control Committee Sessions: "There is an indication that different clinics" involved in the CASS trial "can reduce the variability between their readings by concerted effort to improve both the quality and the completeness of the angiographic examination." The introduction of electronic calipers to judge the severity of the obstruction can eliminate human errors. The computerized protocol has the disadvantage that it takes longer to tabulate cine coronary angiography and it will depend on its pattern, but it certainly will not be as long as filling in the CASS protocol. However, this effort is justified because it will enrich our knowledge of coronary arteriosclerosis. As a result, patients will be divided into proximal (1, 2, 12, 13, and 19), middle (mainly, 3, 14, and 20), and distal (remainder) segments. Sometimes midsegments can be important. For example, in the report from CASS related to the left main equivalent lesions, the 5-year survival rate was 48% if the obstruction on the left anterior descending was proximal and increased to 71% if it was more distal. Several randomized studies to compare PTCA with CABG as suggested by Gruentzig et al in 1979 are underway, and it is hoped that the data will be properly analyzed. However, if cine coronary angiography and the status of the left ventricle are not carefully tabulated (classification of patients into left main trunk or one-, two-, or three-vessel disease is not sufficient), the results of the randomized trials comparing PTCA with CABG will add more confusion instead of clarifying proper therapeutic implications.

The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial phase II: additional information and perspectives

Given the many thrombolytic agents and the number of ways in which they can be combined with mechanical revascularization, the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has been the subject of active study and lively debate, which are likely to continue for some time. Several studies, including TIMI IIA (2,3,10,22), have suggested that immediate catheterization and angioplasty offer no clinical benefit and have a greater complication rate than a more delayed invasive strategy, but TIMI II (1) and SWIFT (16) trials have suggested that an even more conservative strategy of reserving catheterization and coronary angioplasty after thrombolytic therapy for patients with recurrent spontaneous or exercise-induced ischemia may be the most desirable approach for the majority of patients similar to those entered into these trials.

Emergency angioplasty in acute anterior myocardial infarction

Ninety-three patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction were treated with emergency percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). All were found to have a high-grade obstruction in the left anterior descending (LAD) vessel or the bypass graft to this vessel; 64 patients had a total occlusion. A completely successful PTCA, defined as a residual lesion of less than or equal to 50%, was achieved in 73 (78%) patients. A partially successful PTCA, with a residual lesion of 51% to 99%, was achieved in 12 (13%) patients. PTCA was unsuccessful in eight (9%) patients. Hospital mortality was 14%. Three parameters viewed separately each predicted hospital mortality: presence of shock, a proximal location of the LAD vessel occlusion, and the residual stenosis after PTCA. Reocclusion was found in only 11% of patients but 34% had evidence of restenosis on restudy.

Early and late results of coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Direct coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy was performed in 500 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Anterior and inferior infarctions were noted in 217 and 283 patients, respectively. Two hundred fifteen patients (43%) had 1-vessel disease, 85 patients (17%) were greater than 70 years of age and 39 (8%) presented in cardiogenic shock. Successful angioplasty of the infarct vessel was achieved in 94% of patients. The overall in-hospital mortality was 7.2%. Cardiogenic shock, 3-vessel disease and failed angioplasty were the 3 strongest multivariate correlates of early mortality. Reocclusion of the infarct-vessel was noted in 47 (15%) of the 307 patients with angiographic follow-up before hospital discharge. Significant bleeding complications occurred in only 3% of patients; stroke or myocardial rupture was not seen. The global ejection fraction increased from 53% on the preangioplasty ventriculograms to 59% at 1 week (p less than 0.001). Significant regional wall motion improvement in the infarct segments was noted in 53% of patients. Global ejection fraction improved most dramatically in patients presenting with baseline ejection fractions less than or equal to 45% (increasing from 36 to 50%). The 1- and 5-year survival rates after hospital discharge were 95 and 84%, respectively. The 1-year reinfarction rate was 3%. Thus, direct coronary angioplasty was highly effective in reestablishing infarct-vessel patency and salvaging ischemic myocardium, resulting in low in-hospital and long-term mortality.

Intracoronary thrombectomy: a new approach to total occlusion

After initial failure with conventional angioplasty of a total right coronary artery occlusion, we were successful in obtaining patency using a combination of intracoronary thrombectomy and thrombolysis. This represents the first report of this technique in the therapy of total right coronary occlusions.

Implications for patient triage from survival and left ventricular functional recovery analyses in 500 patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

The in-hospital course of 500 consecutive patients treated with coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction was reviewed in relation to their clinical and angiographic presentation and angioplasty outcome to determine which patients benefit most from successful angioplasty in this setting. Patient age was 56 +/- 11 years (mean +/- SD) and 78% were men; 46% had anterior myocardial infarction, 49% received concomitant intravenous thrombolytic therapy, left ventricular ejection fraction was 47 +/- 11% and median time to angioplasty was 4.7 h (range 1 to 24). Angioplasty was successful in 78% of patients and partially successful in 7% of patients; the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10.2%. Multivariate analysis found six independent correlates (p less than 0.05) of in-hospital mortality: left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 30%, lack of postangioplasty infarct artery patency, age greater than 65 years, recurrent ischemia after successful angioplasty, emergency bypass surgery and arterial pressure on admission to the catheterization laboratory less than 100 mm Hg. After consideration of these predictors of survival in multivariate analyses, angioplasty success still was independently correlated with improved in-hospital survival for patients with cardiogenic shock (p = 0.002) and anterior myocardial infarction (p = 0.007). A trend toward an independent beneficial effect of successful angioplasty on survival was also noted in patients with inferior wall infarction and precordial ST segment depression (p = 0.063) and for all patients who were hypotensive on admission to the catheterization laboratory, regardless of the infarct site (p = 0.057).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intracoronary stents: will they fulfill their promise as an adjunct to angioplasty?

Coronary angioplasty as it is now performed has several limitations, including abrupt early arterial closure and delayed restenosis. To obviate these problems and to enhance the safety of the technique, several intracoronary stenting devices have been developed and are under investigation. This report reviews the scientific rationale behind stenting, the results of stenting in animal models and the early results in humans. In early clinical investigation, restenosis appears uncommon but abrupt, presumably thrombotic, occlusion has been reported despite aggressive anticoagulation. As long as the potential for this problem remains and the long-term consequences of placing these devices into arteries of great functional importance remain unknown, stent placement must be undertaken with great caution and should be performed under carefully monitored circumstances with meticulous patient follow-up.