Prediction of cardiac events after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction by clinical variables and dobutamine stress test

Role of strain imaging for assessment of myocardial viability in symptomatic myocardial infarction with single vessel disease: An observational study

PURPOSE

To study and evaluate the predictive value of strain imaging parameters in patients undergoing viability assessment postmyocardial infarction (MI) in comparison with Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) alone.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study (October, 2016-March, 2018), which recruited 100 symptomatic patients with MI, and angiographically proven single vessel disease, LV dysfunction with severe hypokinesia/akinesia on 2D echocardiography and viability proven by baseline DSE. Patients undergoing primary PCI were excluded. Patients were recruited in two groups: DSE alone (first group) and strain imaging with DSE (second group). Revascularization was done in all patients. Patients were assessed at 3 months for functional recovery by 2D echocardiography.

RESULTS

On 3 month follow-up after revascularization, 37 patients (74%) in first group and 33 patients (66.67%) in second group had functional recovery. Dobutamine-stimulated strain parameters such as circumferential strain (CS; P = .005), radial velocity (RV; P < .001), longitudinal strain (LS; P < .001), and longitudinal strain rate (LSR; P < .001) were found to be a significant predictor of viability. The greatest area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curves was obtained for low dose dobutamine RV (AUC = 0.92), low dose dobutamine LS (AUC = 0.94), and low dose dobutamine LSR (AUC = 0.88). Positive predictive value of the combination of low dose DSE with strain parameters (RV-97.2%, LS-97.4%, and LSR-87.5%) for myocardial viability was significantly higher than low dose DSE positive/low dose strain parameters negative patients as well as low dose DSE group alone.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of strain parameters with low dose DSE is clinically feasible for the detection of myocardial viability and adds incremental value to the subjective and semiquantitative wall-motion scoring. LS at low dose DSE with WMSI was found to have the highest positive predictive value.

Coronary calcification with no flow limiting lesions: A potential cause for ischaemic dysfunction in syndrome X patients

Aim

Exertional angina in patients with no coronary flow limiting lesions remains a clinical puzzle. We aimed to assess the extent of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and its relationship to ventricular wall motion function using stress echocardiography in a group of patients limited by exertional angina, but no obstructive lesions.

Methods

We compared CT coronary calcium score (CACS) and dobutamine stress echocardiography in 55 patients (age 64.7 ± 7.7 years), divided into Group 1 (CACS ≤ 100) and Group 2 (CACS > 100). No patient had LV ejection fraction-EF < 55%, pulmonary hypertension, arrhythmia, renal failure or parathyroid disease. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test the association between gender-standardized continuous echocardiographic parameters and patient groups adjusted for age, body surface area, osteoporosis and CV risk factors and CACS.

Results

At rest, LV long axis ‘subendocardial’ function was reduced (amplitude: β − 1.11 SD, p < 0.05, R² 0.6 and systolic velocity: β − 1.08 SD, p < 0.05, R² 0.44), left atrial (LA) indexed volume was raised (β 1.06 SD, p < 0.05, R² 0.37) and its systolic velocity decreased (β − 1.05 SD, p < 0.05, R² 0.35) in Group 2. With stress, wall motion score index increased (p < 0.05) and long axis disturbances worsened only in the same group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated clear relationship between ischaemic LV disturbances, reduced long axis amplitude, global longitudinal systolic strain and early diastolic strain rate. Resting and stress RV lengthening velocity also correlated with CAC score.

Conclusion

In symptomatic patients with no obstructive coronary lesions and with more than mild CAC, long axis disturbances and wall motion score index rise occur with stress, at the time of symptom development and correlate with severity of arterial calcification. These findings suggest CAC as a potential mechanism for coronary wall stiffness and consequently exertional ischaemic changes as a result of limited flow reserve.

Improved clinical outcome after invasive management of patients with recent myocardial infarction and proven myocardial viability: primary results of a randomized controlled trial (VIAMI-trial)

Background

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) not treated with primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at risk for recurrent ischemia, especially when viability in the infarct-area is present. Therefore, an invasive strategy with PCI of the infarct-related coronary artery in patients with viability would reduce the occurrence of a composite end point of death, reinfarction, or unstable angina (UA).

Methods

Patients admitted with an (sub)acute myocardial infarction, who were not treated by primary or rescue PCI, and who were stable during the first 48 hours after the acute event, were screened for the study. Eventually, we randomly assigned 216 patients with viability (demonstrated with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography) to an invasive or a conservative strategy. In the invasive strategy stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery was intended with abciximab as adjunct treatment. Seventy-five (75) patients without viability served as registry group. The primary endpoint was the composite of death from any cause, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina at one year. As secondary endpoint the need for (repeat) revascularization procedures and anginal status were recorded.

Results

The primary combined endpoint of death, recurrent MI and unstable angina was 7.5% (8/106) in the invasive group and 17.3% (19/110) in the conservative group (Hazard ratio 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.96; p = 0.032). During follow up revascularization-procedures were performed in 6.6% (7/106) in the invasive group and 31.8% (35/110) in the conservative group (Hazard ratio 0.18; 95% CI 0.13-0.43; p < 0.0001). A low rate of recurrent ischemia was found in the non-viable group (5.4%) in comparison to the viable-conservative group (14.5%). (Hazard-ratio 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-1.00; p = 0.051).

Conclusion

We demonstrated that after acute MI (treated with thrombolysis or without reperfusion therapy) patients with viability in the infarct-area benefit from a strategy of early in-hospital stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery. This treatment results in a long-term uneventful clinical course. The study confirmed the low risk of recurrent ischemia in patients without viability.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00149591.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on clinical outcome in patients treated with clopidogrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To investigate whether proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) negatively affect clinical outcome in patients treated with clopidogrel. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes evaluated were combined major adverse cardiac events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, death and gastrointestinal bleeding. Studies included were randomized trials or post-hoc analyzes of randomized trials and observational studies reporting adjusted effect estimates. Twenty five studies met the selection criteria and included 159 138 patients. Administration of PPIs together with clopidogrel corresponded to a 29% increased risk of combined major cardiovascular events [risk ratio (RR) = 1.29, 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 1.15-1.45] and a 31% increased risk of MI (RR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.12-1.53). In contrast, PPI use did not negatively influence the mortality (RR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.93-1.16), whereas the risk of developing a gastrointestinal bleed under PPI treatment decreased by 50% (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.37-0.69). The presence of significant heterogeneity might indicate that the evidence is biased, confounded or inconsistent. The sensitivity analysis, however, yielded that the direction of the effect remained unchanged irrespective of the publication type, study quality, study size or risk of developing an event. Two studies indicate that PPIs have a negative effect irrespective of clopidogrel exposure. In conclusion, concomitant PPI use might be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events but does not influence the risk of death. Prospective randomized trials are required to investigate whether a cause-and-effect relationship truly exists and to explore whether different PPIs worsen clinical outcome in clopidogrel treated patients as the PPI-clopidogrel drug-drug interaction does not seem to be a class effect.

Risk Stratification and Prognosis in Octogenarians Undergoing Stress Echocardiographic Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of stress echocardiography (SE) for the diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease in octogenarians is not well defined.

METHODS

Follow-up of 5 years (mean 2.9 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed nonfatal myocardial infarction (n = 17) and cardiac death (n = 37) was obtained in 335 patients, age > or =80 years (mean age 84 +/- 3 years, 44% male), undergoing SE (33% treadmill, 67% dobutamine). Left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion was assessed by a consensus of two echocardiographers and scored as per standard five-point scale, 16-segment model of wall motion analysis. Ischemic LV wall segment was defined as deterioration in the thickening and excursion during stress (increase in wall-motion score index (WMSI) > or =1).

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, inducible ischemia (chi-square = 38.4, P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (chi-square = 41.2, P < 0.001), a history of previous myocardial infarction (chi-square = 22.3, P < 0.01), hypertension (chi-square = 33, P < 0.01), and age (chi-square = 27.7, P < 0.01) were significant predictors of future cardiac events. WMSI, an index of inducible ischemia, provided incremental prognostic information when forced into a multivariable model where clinical and rest echocardiography variables were entered first. WMSI effectively stratified octogenarians into low- and high-risk groups (annualized event rates of 1.2 versus 5.8%/year, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography yields incremental prognostic information in octogenarians and effectively stratifies them into low- and high-risk groups. Precise therapeutic decision making in very elderly patients should incorporate combined clinical and stress echocardiography data.

Levosimendan allows detection of contractile reserve in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and non-diagnostic dobutamine echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine echocardiography is commonly used to detect contractile reserve in ischaemic left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, although its sensitivity and specificity are not optimal. We tested the hypothesis that echocardiography with levosimendan could identify contractile reserve in patients with a non-diagnostic dobutamine test.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with LV ejection fraction <40% and non-diagnostic dobutamine echocardiography underwent levosimendan challenge (24 microg/kg in 10 min) prior to coronary angioplasty or surgery.

RESULTS

Contractile reserve was identified by levosimendan in 10 patients (Gr. A) but was not seen in 12 patients (Gr. B). With levosimendan, LV ejection fraction increased and wall motion score index decreased significantly in Gr. A, but only slightly in Gr. B. Similarly, mean mitral annular plane excursion and peak systolic mitral annular motion velocity increased significantly in Gr. A only. Six months after revascularisation, contractile reserve was seen in 8/10 Gr. A patients but in only 2/12 Gr. B patients (80% vs 17%, p=0.011). LV ejection fraction, wall motion score index, mean mitral annular plane excursion and peak systolic mitral annular motion velocity were significantly higher in Gr. A than in Gr. B.

CONCLUSION

Levosimendan echocardiography can identify contractile reserve in a sizeable proportion of patients with chronic ischaemic LV dysfunction and a non-diagnostic dobutamine test.

The long prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities during the recovery phase of dobutamine stress echocardiography after receiving acute beta-blockade

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of wall motion abnormalities during the recovery phase of dobutamine stress echocardiography in addition to wall motion abnormalities at peak stress.

METHODS

Wall motion abnormalities were assessed at peak and during recovery phase of dobutamine stress echocardiography in 187 consecutive patients, who were followed for occurrence of cardiac events.

RESULTS

During follow-up (mean 36+/-28 months), 19 patients (10%) died from cardiac causes, 34 (18%) patients suffered nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 77 (41%) patients underwent late revascularization. Univariable predictors of cardiac events by Cox regression analysis were age (hazard ratio: 1.01; confidence interval: 1.00-1.03), dyslipidemia (hazard ratio: 1.41; confidence interval: 1.02-1.95), rest wall motion abnormalities (hazard ratio: 1.37; confidence interval: 1.14-1.64), new wall motion abnormalities (hazard ratio: 1.18; confidence interval: 0.95-1.45) at peak and new wall motion abnormalities (hazard ratio: 1.33; confidence interval: 1.11-1.59) at recovery phase of dobutamine stress echocardiography. The best multivariable model to predict cardiac events included new wall motion abnormality (hazard ratio: 5.34; confidence interval: 1.71-16.59) at recovery phase of dobutamine stress echocardiography, after controlling for clinical and peak dobutamine stress echocardiography data.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial ischemia at recovery phase of dobutamine stress echocardiography is an independent predictor of cardiac events and has an incremental value when added to ischemia at peak.

Transient ischemic left ventricular cavity dilation is a significant predictor of severe and extensive coronary artery disease and adverse outcome in patients undergoing stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Transient ischemic dilation (TID) of the left ventricle on stress-redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy is a marker of severe and extensive coronary artery disease (CAD), and associated with an adverse outcome. The significance of transient ischemic dilation during stress echocardiography is not well defined.

METHODS

We assessed 155 patients undergoing stress echocardiography (61% treadmill exercise, 39% dobutamine) with confirmed follow-up (mean 2.8 +/- 1.1 years) for hard events (myocardial infarction, n = 14, and cardiac death, n = 9).

RESULTS

Normal limits for TID ratio were developed using data from 39 patients with a low likelihood (<5%) of CAD and normal stress echocardiography study findings. The criteria for abnormality was developed based on data from 116 patients who underwent coronary angiography after and within 3 months of an abnormal ischemic stress echocardiography study result. For normal limits, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that abnormal TID ratio values corresponded to left ventricular volume ratios greater than 1.17 (mean +/- 2SD). TID assessment using these criteria for abnormality showed high sensitivity (100%) and moderate specificity (54%) for detection of severe and extensive angiographic CAD. Patients with TID had a greater extent and severity of stress induced wall-motion abnormalities, higher peak wall-motion score index, and worse prognosis than patients without TID.

CONCLUSIONS

TID during stress echocardiography is a sensitive marker of severe and extensive angiographic CAD and is associated with a high risk of cardiac events (19.7%/y event rate).

Outcome after redo coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium

BACKGROUND

Repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (redo-CABG) in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy is associated with high perioperative risk and worse long-term outcome compared with patients undergoing their first CABG.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patients with viable myocardium undergoing redo-CABG have a better outcome.

METHODS

18 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy underwent redo-CABG and 34 underwent their first CABG; all had substantial viability (> or =25% of the left ventricle) on dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart failure symptoms were assessed before and 9-12 months after revascularisation. Cardiac event rate was assessed during the follow-up period (median 4 years, 25-75th centile 2.8-4.9 years).

RESULTS

The extent of viable myocardium on DSE was comparable in the two groups (11.3 (3.9) segments in patients who underwent redo-CABG v 12.8 (3.0) in patients who underwent their first CABG; p = NS). LVEF improved from 32% (9%) to 39% (12%); p = 0.01, in patients who underwent redo-CABG and from 30% (7%) to 36% (7%); p<0.01, in those who underwent their first CABG; New York Heart Association class improved from 2.5 (1.1) to 1.9 (0.8); p = 0.03, and from 2.7 (1.0) to 1.8 (0.70); p<0.01, respectively. In patients who underwent redo-CABG, the perioperative mortality was 0, post-surgery inotropic support was needed in 11% of the patients and mid-term (4-year) survival was 100%, with a total event rate of 28%. All these variables were not statistically different from patients who underwent their first CABG (p = 0.50, 0.90, 0.08 and 0.81, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and substantial viability undergoing redo-CABG benefit from revascularisation in terms of improvement in LVEF, heart failure symptoms, angina and mid-term prognosis.

Incremental Prognostic Value of Stress Echocardiography Over Clinical and Stress Electrocardiographic Variables in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction: "Warranty Time" of a Normal Stress Echocardiogram

BACKGROUND

Patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) are at increased risk of subsequent cardiac events (MI or cardiac death). The incremental prognostic value and warranty time of a normal stress echocardiogram in this high-risk population is not well defined.

METHODS

We evaluated 251 consecutive patients (62 +/- 11 years; 64% males) with remote history of MI (>6 weeks) undergoing stress echocardiography (83% dobutamine). Ischemia was defined as a new reversible wall motion abnormality and/or biphasic response. Follow-up for up to 4 years (mean 2.9 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed MI (n = 7) and cardiac death (n = 15) were obtained.

RESULTS

Stress echocardiography effectively risk stratified patients into normal versus abnormal subgroups (Event rate 0.8% per year vs 4.2% per year; P = 0.01; RR = 5.6, 95% CI = 1.3-24.7). In patients with a normal stress echocardiogram, the event rate at the end of 6, 12, and 18 months were <1% per year. After 18 months the event rate in patients with a normal stress echocardiogram increased greatly (>1% per year). Stress echocardiography yields incremental prognostic value over clinical and stress electrocardiographic variables (Global chi-square increased from 12.4 to 25 to 31.1, P < 0.0001 both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography yields appropriate risk stratification and prognosis and provides incremental prognostic value over clinical and stress electrocardiographic variables even in patients with prior MI. A normal stress echocardiogram portends a benign prognosis (<1% event rate/year) for up to 18 months.

Benefits of coronary revascularisation in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: Role of myocardial viability

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus in patients with coronary artery disease is associated with poor outcome. In this study, the relation between myocardial viability, diabetes, coronary revascularisation and outcome was evaluated.

METHODS

129 patients (31 diabetic, 98 non-diabetic) with ischaemic cardiomyopathy underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography to assess myocardial viability. Patients with >or=4 viable segments were defined as viable and patients with <4 viable segments as nonviable. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed before and 9-12 months post-revascularisation. At the same time-points, LV volumes were measured to evaluate LV remodelling. Finally, cardiac events were noted during 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The extent of viable myocardium was comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. After revascularisation, LVEF increased >or=5% in 44% of diabetic and in 40% of non-diabetic patients. LVEF only improved in patients with viable myocardium. Ongoing LV remodelling occurred in 36% and 35% of diabetic and non-diabetic patients respectively, and was related to non-viability, whereas viability protected against ongoing LV remodelling, both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Viability was the only predictor of survival after revascularisation.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetic, viable patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction exhibit improvement in LVEF post-revascularisation with prevention of ongoing LV remodelling, similar to non-diabetic patients. Myocardial viability was also the only predictor of long-term outcome.

The use of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease: an overview

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress echocardiography has a high accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease. Additionally, it provides clinically useful prognostic information, such as resting left ventricular function, myocardial viability, stress-induced ischemia, vascular extent of wall motion abnormalities, and changes in end-systolic volume and ejection fraction with stress.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The timing, extent, and severity of the stress-induced wall motion abnormalities are important determinants of long-term prognosis. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of stress echocardiography in predicting long-term cardiac events in mixed patient groups and the value of this test in selected patient subsets.

SUMMARY

This review attempts to define the role of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease, pointing out the ability of this technique to identify low-risk and high-risk subsets among patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and thus guide patient management decisions.

Relation of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction versus improvement in heart failure symptoms after coronary revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy

In the present study, the relation between improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and heart failure symptoms was evaluated in 100 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary revascularization. In patients with viable myocardium, the improvement in the LVEF after revascularization was accompanied by improvement in heart failure symptoms in most patients (80%); most viable patients (75%) without improvement in LVEF also showed an improvement in New York Heart Association functional class. Conversely, most nonviable patients failed to improve in LVEF or New York Heart Association class.

Long term prognostic value of myocardial viability and ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relative merits of viability and ischaemia for prognosis after revascularisation.

METHODS

Low-high dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was performed before revascularisation in 128 consecutive patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 31 (8)%). Viability (defined as contractile reserve (CR)) and ischaemia were assessed during low and high dose dobutamine infusion, respectively. Cardiac death was evaluated during a five year follow up. Clinical, angiographic, and echocardiographic data were analysed to identify predictors of events.

RESULTS

Univariable predictors of cardiac death were the presence of multivessel disease (hazard ratio (HR) 0.21, p < 0.001), baseline LVEF (HR 0.90, p < 0.0001), wall motion score index (WMSI) at rest (HR 4.02, p = 0.0006), low dose DSE (HR 7.01, p < 0.0001), peak dose DSE (HR 4.62, p < 0.0001), the extent of scar (HR 1.39, p < 0.0001), and the presence of CR in > or = 25% of dysfunctional segments (HR 0.34, p = 0.02). The best multivariable model to predict cardiac death included the presence of multivessel disease, WMSI at low dose DSE, and the presence of CR in > or = 25% of the severely dysfunctional segments (HR 9.62, p < 0.0001). Inclusion of ischaemia in the model did not provide additional predictive value.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the present study illustrate that in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, the extent of viability (CR) is a strong predictor of long term prognosis after revascularisation. Ischaemia did not add significantly in predicting outcome.

Improvement of stress LVEF rather than rest LVEF after coronary revascularisation in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and viable myocardium

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prospectively the response of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to high dose dobutamine infusion in patients showing substantial viability, with and without improved resting LVEF after revascularisation.

METHODS

Before and 9-12 months after revascularisation, 50 patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF 32 (8)%) and substantial myocardial viability (> or = 4 viable segments) underwent radionuclide ventriculography and dobutamine stress echocardiography. Patients were divided into group 1, patients with, and group 2, patients without significant improvement in resting LVEF (> or = 5% by radionuclide ventriculography) after revascularisation. The response of LVEF during dobutamine stress echocardiography was compared in these two groups.

RESULTS

Groups 1 and 2 were comparable in baseline characteristics, resting LVEF, and number of viable segments (mean (SD) 7 (4) v 6 (2), not significant). After revascularisation, the LVEF response during dobutamine stress echocardiography improved significantly in both groups (group 1, 34 (10)% to 56 (8)%; group 2, 32 (10)% to 46 (11)%; both p < 0.001). Interestingly, although resting LVEF did not improve in group 2, peak stress LVEF after revascularisation did (p < 0.001). Group 1 patients had, however, a greater increase in peak stress LVEF (group 1, 22 (10)%; group 2, 13 (9)%; p < 0.01). New York Heart Association and Canadian Cardiovascular Society classes decreased in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with viable myocardium did not always have improved rest LVEF after revascularisation, peak stress LVEF improved. Assessment of improvement of resting function may not be the ideal end point to evaluate successful revascularisation.

Early and long-term outcome of elective stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with viability in the infarct-area: Rationale and design of the Viability-guided Angioplasty after acute Myocardial Infarction-trial (The VIAMI-trial)

Background

Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is becoming the standard therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), to date most patients, even in developed countries, are reperfused with intravenous thrombolysis or do not receive a reperfusion therapy at all. In the post-lysis period these patients are at high risk for recurrent ischemic events. Early identification of these patients is mandatory as this subgroup could possibly benefit from an angioplasty of the infarct-related artery.

Since viability seems to be related to ischemic adverse events, we initiated a clinical trial to investigate the benefits of PCI with stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with viability detected early after acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

The VIAMI-study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients who are hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction and who did not have primary or rescue PCI, undergo viability testing by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (LDDE) within 3 days of admission. Consequently, patients with demonstrated viability are randomized to an invasive or conservative strategy. In the invasive strategy patients undergo coronary angiography with the intention to perform PCI with stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery and concomitant use of abciximab. In the conservative group an ischemia-guided approach is adopted (standard optimal care).

The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, reinfarction and unstable angina during a follow-up period of three years.

Conclusion

The primary objective of the VIAMI-trial is to demonstrate that angioplasty of the infarct-related coronary artery with stenting and concomitant use of abciximab results in a clinically important risk reduction of future cardiac events in patients with viability in the infarct-area, detected early after myocardial infarction.

Novel stress echocardiographic model incorporating the extent and severity of wall motion abnormality for risk stratification and prognosis

The prognostic value of stress echocardiography to predict future cardiac events using the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities is not well defined. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model for interpretation of stress echocardiographic studies by using the extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities. We evaluated 1,500 patients (59 +/- 13 years old; 51% men) who underwent stress echocardiography (34% on the treadmill exercise and 66% on dobutamine). Left ventricular regional wall motion was assessed by consensus of 2 experienced echocardiographers. Follow-up periods (mean 2.7 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed myocardial infarction (n = 31) and cardiac death (n = 44) were identified. Multivariate regression analysis identified 2 independent predictors of cardiac events: the number of left ventricular wall segments with new wall motion abnormalities (an index of the extent of ischemia) and the maximal magnitude of new wall motion abnormalities (an index of the severity of ischemia). The ischemic extent (chi-square 48.7, p <0.0001) and maximal severity (chi-square 52.0, p <0.0001) were exponentially correlated with an increase in event rate. On the basis of these data, a prognostic model was defined that uses ischemic extent and maximal severity as stress-dependent orthogonal variables. With this 3-dimensional model, the predicted event rate ranged over sevenfold, from a low of 0.9%/year in patients without any wall motion abnormalities to a high of 6.7%/year in patients with extensive and severe wall motion abnormalities. The extent and severity of wall motion abnormalities by stress echocardiography are independent and cumulative predictors of prognosis in patients who have suspected or known ischemic heart disease.

[Predictive significance of residual ischemia detected by the dobutamine stress-echocardiography test soon after the first uncomplicated myocardial infarction]

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress-echocardiography (ECG) test for new coronary events (new episodes of angina pectoris, cardiac-related deaths, and reinfarctions) early after the first uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Dobutamine stress-echocardiography tests were performed in all of 104 patients 10-20 days after the first myocardial infarction. Patients were followed-up for 36 (29 +/- 7) months. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves were tested by Breslow test (Log Rank).

RESULTS

Two cardiac deaths (1.92%), nine nonfatal myocardial infarctions (8.65%), and three cases of recurrent angina pectoris (2.88%) occurred during the prospective follow-up. Cumulative survival curves showed that in patients with negative findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test, survival time without significant events was 35.31 months, while in the group with positive findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test it was 30.91 months (log Rank 7.22; p<0.01). Prognostic value of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test was analyzed by Cox regression model and was 2.92, meaning that the risk of significant events was 2.92 times higher in the group of patients with positive findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test.

CONCLUSION

Patients with negative findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test were with significantly higher possibility of surviving without significant events in comparison with the patients in whom the findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test were positive. In combination with clinical signs and ECG results, the results of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test improved prognostic value in the patients with the first uncomplicated myocardial infarction, and in that way influenced the strategy of their further treatment.

Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging detects more residual ischemia than stress echocardiography following acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This investigation sought to compare the abilities of stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography to detect residual ischemia in patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography are both commonly used to assess patients (patients.) in the immediate post MI period. However, the relative value of these techniques in identifying post MI ischemia remains unclear.

METHODS

Eighteen patients. underwent both dipyridamole radionuclide perfusion imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography on the same day or on consecutive days, 3-7 days following uncomplicated acute MI. Pts. who had an acute percutaneous intervention were excluded. Images were reviewed with clinical information available, but blinded to the opposing modality, for perfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities (WMA), and evidence of ischemia (reversible defect(s) on perfusion imaging, worsening WMA on stress echocardiography). Of the 18 patients, 11 subsequently underwent cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

Perfusion imaging identified defects in 16 (89%) patients, of whom 15 (83% of total) were found to be ischemic. Stress echocardiography identified a fixed wall motion abnormality in 17 (94%) and ischemia in 8 (44%, p < 0.05 compared with perfusion imaging ischemia). Among 11 patients who underwent catheterization, there was a trend towards perfusion imaging identifying more ischemia in the territory of an obstructed (> or = 70%) vessel--100% (11/11) vs. 64% (7/11) for stress echocardiography (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

In the immediate post-infarction period, dipyridamole stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging more often shows evidence of residual ischemia than dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Practical applications in stress echocardiography

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to define appropriate parameters for risk stratification and prognosis in patients undergoing stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Stress echocardiography is an established technique for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. However, current data on risk stratification of patients undergoing stress echocardiography are limited.

METHODS

We evaluated 1,500 patients (59 +/- 13 years old; 51% male) undergoing stress echocardiography (34% with treadmill exercise and 66% with dobutamine). Resting left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and regional wall motion were assessed by the consensus of two echocardiographers. Follow-up (mean 2.7 +/- 1.0 years) for confirmed non-fatal myocardial infarction (n = 31) and cardiac death (n = 44) were performed.

RESULTS

By univariate analysis, both the peak wall motion score index (WMSI) (p < 0.0001) and EF (p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of cardiac events. Peak WMSI effectively risk stratified patients into low (0.9%/year), intermediate (3.1%/year), and high (5.2%/year) risk groups (p < 0.0001). A threshold of 45% EF provided further risk stratification of all WMSI groups. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, peak WMSI (relative risk [RR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0 to 4.4; p = 0.04) and EF (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0; p = 0.01) were both predictors of cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography yields prognostic information for risk stratification of patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. A normal stress echocardiographic study (peak WMSI = 1.0) confers a benign prognosis (0.9%/year cardiac event rate). Peak WMSI >1.7 and EF < or =45% are independent markers of patients at high risk of an adverse clinical outcome.

Prognostic power of dobutamine echocardiography after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction in the elderly

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess the prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DSE) after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in elderly patients.

DESIGN

We analyzed 59 consecutive patients (42 men) aged > or = 70 years (mean +/- SD age, 75 +/- 4 years) who underwent DSE within 10 days after uncomplicated AMI. DSE was carried out following the standard protocol. Five myocardial responses were considered: (1) negative, (2) sustained improvement of contractility, (3) biphasic response (initial improvement followed by worsening), (4) worsening of contractility in the infarcted area, and (5) worsening at a distance.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 13 +/- 8 months. Twenty-one patients had an event: cardiac death (n = 5), myocardial infarction (n = 1), heart failure (n = 1), unstable angina (n = 10), and revascularization (n = 4). Clinical and stress echocardiographic variables previously related to adverse prognosis were entered in Cox regression analysis, and the predictors of impaired outcome were inducible ischemia during DSE (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77 to 4.99; p < 0.001) and resting wall motion score index (WMSI) > 1.6 (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.77; p = 0.04). After excluding revascularization procedures and considering only spontaneous events, the following predictors were found: ischemia during DSE (HR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.78 to 3.12; p < 0.001) and resting WMSI > 1.6 (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.93; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Inducible ischemia during DSE within 10 days after uncomplicated AMI predicts an impaired outcome in the elderly.

Prognostic assessment of uncomplicated first myocardial infarction by exercise echocardiography and Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT

BACKGROUND

We evaluate the prognostic value of stress echo and gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) after a first uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used predischarge maximal subjective exercise echocardiography and gated SPECT with technetium 99m tetrofosmin to prospectively study 103 patients younger than 70 years with a first acute myocardial infarction. During a 12-month follow-up period, 2 patients died, 9 had heart failure, and 29 had ischemic complications (4 reinfarction and 25 angina). Predictive variables for heart failure in multivariate analysis were ejection fraction evaluated by echocardiography (odds ratio [OR] 8.5, P =.016) or by gated SPECT (OR 10.7, P =.009). Predictive variables for ischemic complications in multivariate analysis were less than 5 metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise test (OR 5.2, P =.007) and greater than 15% ischemic extent in the polar map (OR 3.6, P =.04) of SPECT.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise echocardiography and Tc-99m tetrofosmin gated SPECT were predictive for heart failure, but exercise SPECT was the only test with predictive power for ischemic complications.

Prognostic interaction between viability and residual myocardial ischemia by dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction and mildly impaired left ventricular function

Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) accurately detects viable myocardium and residual ischemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The prognostic interaction of viability and ischemia has not been completely clarified in these patients. This study assesses the long-term effect of viability, ischemia, or their combination on survival in patients with AMI and mildly impaired left ventricular (LV) function. Four hundred eleven patients (age 57 +/- 9 years) underwent predischarge DSE (up to 40 microg/kg/min plus atropine if needed) after uncomplicated AMI and were prospectively followed for 23 months (range 1 to 78). According to DSE findings, patients were divided into 4 groups: viability only, ischemia only, combination of viability and ischemia, and scar. Adverse outcome occurred in 64 patients: 34 patients had hard events (9 cardiac deaths, 25 nonfatal AMI) and 30 patients had unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The combination of viability and ischemia, diabetes mellitus, and non-Q-wave AMI were significant predictors of all events at univariate and multivariate analysis. The same variables were also univariate predictors of hard events, but multivariate analysis indicated only the combination of viability and ischemia and diabetes as independent predictors. The event-free survival of patients with combined viability and ischemia was significantly lower (hazard ratio 3 [95% confidence interval 1.8 to 11]) compared with patients with ischemia only. Thus, viability and ischemia show a significant adverse prognostic interaction in patients with AMI and preserved LV function.

Comparison of myocardial blood flow during dobutamine-atropine infusion with that after dipyridamole administration in normal men

OBJECTIVES

The present study was designed to compare the absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) after intravenous dipyridamole infusion with that during dobutamine-atropine administration in normal healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND

Both safety and usefulness of dobutamine-atropine stress in myocardial perfusion imaging have been reported. However, no information exists on whether the magnitude ofhyperemia achieved with dipyridamole and dobutamine-atropine is comparable.

METHODS

Myocardial blood flow was measured with positron emission tomography and 15O-labeled water in 20 healthy young men (23 +/- 3 years) 1) at baseline, 2) after dipyridamole infusion (0.56 mg/kg over 4 min), and 3) during dobutamine (40 microg/kg/min) and atropine (0.25 to 1.0 mg) infusion.

RESULTS

The MBF was significantly increased during dipyridamole infusion and during dobutamine-atropine stress compared with at rest (4.33 +/- 1.23 and 5.89 +/- 1.58 vs. 0.67 +/- 0.16 ml/min/g, respectively, p < 0.0001). Moreover, dobutamine-atropine infusion produced greater MBF compared with dipyridamole (p = 0.0011), while coronary vascular resistance did not differ significantly after dipyridamole administration and during dobutamine-atropine infusion (17.6 +/- 7.9 vs. 18.6 +/- 5.6 mm Hg/[ml/min/g], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Near maximal coronary vasodilatation caused by dipyridamole is attainable using dobutamine and atropine in young healthy volunteers. Dobutamine in conjunction with atropine is no less effective than dipyridamole in producing myocardial hyperemia.