Hemodynamic and neuroendocrine effects for candoxatril and frusemide in mild stable chronic heart failure

Lack of durable natriuresis and objective decongestion following SGLT2 inhibition in randomized controlled trials of patients with heart failure

Patients with heart failure have increased cardiac filling pressures, circulating natriuretic peptides, and physical signs of fluid retention, which are related to sodium retention by the kidneys and are alleviated by conventional diuretics. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors interfere with sodium and glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubule, but they evoke a marked counterregulatory activation of sodium and water reabsorption in distal nephron segments, which opposes and negates any diuretic effect. Nevertheless, it has been postulated that SGLT2 inhibitors modulate the volume set point, leading selectively to decongestion in patients with fluid overload. This hypothesis was tested in a review of 15 randomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure, with 7 trials focusing on urinary volume within the first week, and 8 trials focusing on objective decongestion at 12 weeks. In trials < 1 week, SGLT2 inhibition increased urine volume in the first 24 h, but typically without a change in urinary sodium excretion, and this diuresis was not sustained. In 8 trials of 12 weeks' duration, none reported alleviation of edema, ascites or pulmonary rales. The 2 trials that evaluated changes in left ventricular filling pressure noted no or small changes (1-2 mm Hg); the two trials that measured interstitial lung water or total blood volume found no effect; and 6 of the 7 trials found no decrease in circulating natriuretic peptides. Therefore, randomized controlled trials do not indicate that SGLT2 inhibitors produce a durable natriuresis or objective decongestion in patients with heart failure.

Neprilysin Inhibitors in Heart Failure: The Science, Mechanism of Action, Clinical Studies, and Unanswered Questions

This article provides a contemporary review and a new perspective on the role of neprilysin inhibition in heart failure (HF) in the context of recent clinical trials and addresses potential mechanisms and unanswered questions in certain HF patient populations. Neprilysin is an endopeptidase that cleaves a variety of peptides such as natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, adrenomedullin, substance P, angiotensin I and II, and endothelin. It has a broad role in cardiovascular, renal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and neurologic functions. The combined angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) has been developed with an intent to increase vasodilatory natriuretic peptides and prevent counterregulatory activation of the angiotensin system. ARNi therapy is very effective in reducing the risks of death and hospitalization for HF in patients with HF and New York Heart Association functional class II to III symptoms, but studies failed to show any benefits with ARNi when compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction or in patients following myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction but without HF. These raise the questions about whether the enzymatic breakdown of natriuretic peptides may not be a very effective solution in advanced HF patients when there is downstream blunting of the response to natriuretic peptides or among post-myocardial infarction patients in the absence of HF when there may not be a need for increased natriuretic peptide availability. Furthermore, there is a need for additional studies to determine the long-term effects of ARNi on albuminuria, obesity, glycemic control and lipid profile, blood pressure, and cognitive function in patients with HF.

READY: relative efficacy of loop diuretics in patients with chronic systolic heart failure-a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials

The majority of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) receive long-term treatment with loop diuretics. The comparative effectiveness of different loop diuretics is unknown. We searched PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov , the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the European Union Clinical Trials Register for randomised clinical trials exploring the efficacy of the loop diuretics azosemide, bumetanide, furosemide or torasemide in patients with HF. Comparators included placebo, standard medical care or any other active treatment. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular mortality, HF-related hospitalisation and any combined endpoint thereof. Hypokalaemia and acute renal failure were defined as additional safety endpoints. Evidence was synthesised using network meta-analysis (NMA). Thirty-four trials reporting on 2647 patients were included. The overall quality of evidence was rated as moderate. NMA demonstrated no significant differences between loop diuretics with respect to all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or hypokalaemia. In contrast, torasemide ranked best in terms of HF hospitalisation, and there was a trend towards benefits with torasemide with regard to occurrence of acute renal failure. Sensitivity analyses excluding trials with a follow-up < 6 months, trials with a cross-over design and those including < 25 patients confirmed the main results. We found no significant superiority of either loop diuretic with respect to mortality and safety endpoints. However, clinicians may prefer torasemide, as it was associated with fewer HF-related hospitalisations.

Role of Neprilysin Inhibitors in Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a complex multifactorial medical condition that should be addressed according to its complexity and diversity. Currently, there is a medical arsenal available for the management of HF, but despite the advance in medical resources, its prevalence and social and financial impacts are still worrisome for the medical community and society. Among the numerous therapeutic options for the treatment of HF, neprilysin inhibitors have changed the perspective of the approach to titrate patients who suffer from this condition because neprilysin plays a role in the degradation of natriuretic peptides and various other vasoactive compounds that are crucial to counteract the devastating pathophysiology of HF. The purpose of this review was to analyze the role of neprilysin inhibitors in HF, focusing on newer therapy such as LCZ696 and studies that sustain its potential benefits in this medical entity.

Evolving Role of Natriuretic Peptides from Diagnostic Tool to Therapeutic Modality

Natriuretic peptides (NP) are widely recognized as key regulators of blood pressure, water and salt homeostasis. In addition, they play a critical role in physiological cardiac growth and mediate a variety of biological effects including antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory effects in other organs and tissues. The cardiac release of NPs ANP and BNP represents an important compensatory mechanism during acute and chronic cardiac overload and during the pathogenesis of heart failure where their actions counteract the sustained activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and other neurohormonal systems. Elevated circulating plasma NP levels correlate with the severity of heart failure and particularly BNP and the pro-peptide, NT-proBNP have been established as biomarkers for the diagnosis of heart failure as well as prognostic markers for cardiovascular risk. Despite activation of the NP system in heart failure it is inadequate to prevent progressive fluid and sodium retention and cardiac remodeling. Therapeutic approaches included administration of synthetic peptide analogs and the inhibition of NP-degrading enzyme neutral endopeptidase (NEP). Of all strategies only the combined NEP/ARB inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan had shown clinical success in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure.

Current Understanding of the Compensatory Actions of Cardiac Natriuretic Peptides in Cardiac Failure: A Clinical Perspective

Natriuretic peptides play a crucial role in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis. Among their properties are vasodilation, natriuresis, diuresis, and inhibition of cardiac remodeling. As heart failure progresses, however, natriuretic peptides fail to compensate. Knowledge of their processing and signaling pathways has guided the development of pharmacological therapies aimed at bolstering their effects. The drugs that have achieved the most clinical success have also stirred the most controversy. Nesiritide, the synthetic B-type natriuretic peptide, yielded significant symptomatic relief and improved haemodynamics but its use was plagued with questions surrounding its possibly harmful impact on renal function. More recently, compounds containing inhibitors of neprilysin, the enzyme responsible for degrading natriuretic peptides, have demonstrated morbidity and mortality benefit, but have also been linked to possible negative side effects. Clearly, potentiating the actions of natriuretic peptides for the benefit of patients is not as simple as just raising their serum concentration. This article reviews the current understanding of the compensatory actions of cardiac natriuretic peptides in heart failure and how this knowledge is revolutionizing heart failure therapy.

Should Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitors Replace Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With a Reduced Ejection Fraction?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have been the cornerstone of treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) for over two decades. Inhibition of neprilyisin augments vasoactive substances including natriuretic peptides, which may have multiple advantageous effects in chronic HF. Early studies of neprilyisin inhibition led to drug discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or safety concerns. Sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class combined angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). The PARADIGM-HF study demonstrated robust superiority of ARNI compared with enalapril in patients with chronic symptomatic HFrEF, raising the question of whether ACEI should still have a role in the management of HFrEF.

The Mechanism of Action of LCZ696

Heart failure (HF) represents a growing financial burden on healthcare systems and despite therapeutic advances, mortality remains high. Current treatments focus on blocking neurohormonal pathways, such as the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS). Recent research has focused on the natriuretic peptide system, which confers beneficial effects in HF, whereas activation of the RAAS and of the sympathetic nervous system has detrimental effects. LCZ696 (sacubutril/valsartan), a first-in-class angiotensin II AT[1] receptor neprilysin inhibitor, has a unique mode of action that targets both pathways. Clinical studies to date indicate that LCZ696 is effective and safe in mild to moderate arterial hypertension and in HF patients with preserved ejection fraction, and has been shown to be superior to enalapril in patients with moderate to severe HF due to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors: clinical potential in heart failure and beyond

Heart failure remains a major concern across the globe as life expectancies and delivery of health care continue to improve. There has been a dearth of new developments in heart failure therapies in the last decade until last year, with the release of the results from the PARADIGM-HF Trial heralding the arrival of a promising new class of drug, ie, the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor. In this review, we discuss the evolution of our incremental understanding of the neurohormonal mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of heart failure, which has led to our success in modulating its various pathways. We start by examining the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, followed by the challenges of modulating the natriuretic peptide system. We then delve deeper into the pharmacology and mechanisms by which angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors achieve their significant cardiovascular benefits. Finally, we also consider the potential application of this new class of drug in other areas, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, hypertension, patients with renal impairment, and following myocardial infarction.

Future pharmacologic agents for treatment of heart failure in children

The addition of new agents to the armamentarium of treatment options for heart failure in pediatric patients is exciting and challenging. Administration of these therapies to pediatric patients will require careful scrutiny of the data and skilled application. Developmental changes in drug metabolism, excretion, and distribution are concerning in pediatric patients, and inappropriate evaluation of these parameters can have disastrous results. Manipulation of the neurohormonal pathways in heart failure has been the target of most recently developed pharmacologic agents. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), aldosterone antagonists, beta-blockers, and natriuretic peptides are seeing increased use in pediatrics. In particular, calcium sensitizing agents represent a new frontier in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure and may replace traditional inotropic therapies. Endothelin receptor antagonists have shown benefit in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, but their use in heart failure is still debatable. Vasopressin antagonists, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and neutral endopeptidase inhibitors are also targeting aspects of the neurohormonal cascade that are currently not completely understood. The future of pharmacologic therapies will include pharmacogenomic studies on new and preexisting therapies for pediatric heart failure. The education and skill of the practitioner when applying these agents in pediatric heart failure is of utmost importance.

Neutral endopeptidase 24.11 is important for the degradation of both endogenous and exogenous glucagon in anesthetized pigs

Glucagon has a short plasma t(1/2) in vivo, with renal extraction playing a major role in its elimination. Glucagon is degraded by neutral endopeptidase (NEP) 24.11 in vitro, but the physiological relevance of NEP 24.11 in glucagon metabolism is unknown. Therefore, the influence of candoxatril, a selective NEP inhibitor, on plasma levels of endogenous and exogenous glucagon was examined in anesthetized pigs. Candoxatril increased endogenous glucagon concentrations, from 6.3 +/- 2.5 to 20.7 +/- 6.3 pmol/l [COOH-terminal (C)-RIA, P < 0.05]. During glucagon infusion, candoxatril increased the t(1/2) determined by C-RIA (from 3.0 +/- 0.5 to 17.0 +/- 2.5 min, P < 0.005) and midregion (M)-RIA (2.8 +/- 0.5 to 17.0 +/- 3.0 min, P < 0.01) and reduced metabolic clearance rates (MCR; 19.1 +/- 3.2 to 9.4 +/- 2.0 ml.kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.02, C-RIA; 19.2 +/- 4.8 to 9.0 +/- 2.3 ml.kg(-1).min(-1), P < 0.05, M-RIA). However, neither t(1/2) nor MCR determined by NH2-terminal (N)-RIA were significantly affected (t(1/2), 2.7 +/- 0.4 to 4.5 +/- 1.6 min; MCR, 30.3 +/- 6.4 to 28.5 +/- 9.0 ml.kg(-1).min(-1)), suggesting that candoxatril had no effect on NH2-terminal degradation but leads to the accumulation of NH2-terminally truncated forms of glucagon. Determination of arteriovenous glucagon concentration differences revealed that renal glucagon extraction was reduced (but not eliminated) by candoxatril (from 40.4 +/- 3.8 to 18.6 +/- 4.1%, P < 0.02, C-RIA; 29.2 +/- 3.1 to 14.7 +/- 2.2%, P < 0.02, M-RIA; 26.5 +/- 4.0 to 19.7 +/- 3.5%, P < 0.06, N-RIA). Femoral extraction was reduced by candoxatril when determined by C-RIA (from 22.7 +/- 2.4 to 8.0 +/- 5.1%, P < 0.05) but was not changed significantly when determined using M- or N-RIAs (10.0 +/- 2.8 to 4.7 +/- 3.7%, M-RIA; 10.5 +/- 2.5 to 7.8 +/- 4.2%, N-RIA). This study provides evidence that NEP 24.11 is an important mediator of the degradation of both endogenous and exogenous glucagon in vivo.

The therapeutic effect of natriuretic peptides in heart failure; differential regulation of endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthases

The abnormal regulation of nitric oxide synthase activity represents an underlying feature of heart failure. Increased peripheral vascular resistance, and decreased renal function may be in part related to impaired endothelium-dependent nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. Paradoxically, the chronic production of NO by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in heart failure exerts deleterious effects on ventricular contractility, and circulatory function. Consequently, pharmacologically improving endothelium-dependent NO synthesis and the concomitant inhibition of iNOS activity would be therapeutically advantageous. Interestingly, natriuretic peptides have been shown to differentially regulate endothelial NOS (eNOS) and iNOS activity. Moreover, in both patients and animal models of heart failure, pharmacologically increasing plasma natriuretic peptide levels ameliorated vascular tone, renal function, and ventricular contractility. Based on these observations, the following review will explore whether the therapeutic benefit of the natriuretic peptide system in heart failure may occur in part via the amelioration of endothelium-dependent NO synthesis, and the concomitant inhibition of cytokine-mediated iNOS expression.

Vasopeptidase inhibitors

Vasopeptidase inhibitors are a new class of drugs that have dual inhibitory effects on two key enzymes involved in the metabolism of vasoactive peptides. Essentially, they inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), thereby blocking the generation of angiotensin II (Ang II); at the same time they prevent the breakdown of natriuretic peptides by the enzyme neutral endopeptidase. The combination of reduction of Ang II on a background of increased natriuretic peptide activity has several potential advantages for the treatment of cardiovascular and renal disease and in particular, hypertension and congestive heart failure (CHF). Several vasopeptidase inhibitors, such as sampatrilat, fasidotril, gemopatrilat and omapatrilat (Vanlev, the most clinically developed vasopeptidase inhibitor to date) are under intensive clinical investigation. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated effective antihypertensive activity in hypertension, independent of age, renin and salt status or ethnic origin, and have also highlighted the potential for vasopeptidase inhibition as a new therapeutic modality for the treatment of CHF. Moreover, ongoing research suggests that this new class of drugs may be an important approach, not only for the treatment of hypertension and of conditions associated with overt volume overload but also for ischaemic heart disease.

Diuretics in the treatment of patients who present congestive heart failure and hypertension

The main operational objective of diuretic therapy in patients who present congestive heart failure and hypertension is to reduce or to suppress excess bodily fluid. Effective diuretic therapy decreases cardiac size when the heart is dilated, and it reduces lung congestion and excess water. Consequently, external respiratory work diminishes and cardiac output would be redistributed in favour of systemic vascular beds other than that of the respiratory muscles; dyspnoea decreases markedly and there is a slight reduction in fatigue. This clinical improvement and the fall in body weight caused by diuretics entail an increase in effort capacity. Subsequent exercise training ameliorates the abnormal ventilatory response to physical effort and the skeletal muscle myopathy that occur in heart failure, and thereby it attenuates dyspnoea and decreases fatigue further. Loop and/or thiazide-type diuretics may be used to augment natriuresis in patients with congestive heart failure and hypertension. The state of renal function, the existence of certain co-morbid conditions, potential untoward drug actions, and possible interactions of diuretics with nutrients and with other drugs are some of the factors that must be considered at the time of deciding on the diuretic drug(s) and dose(s) to be prescribed. Spironolactone has been found to increase life expectancy and to reduce hospitalisation frequency when added to the conventional therapeutic regimen of patients with advanced congestive heart failure and systolic dysfunction. Therefore, spironolactone should be the drug of choice to oppose the kaliuretic effect of a loop or of a thiazide-type diuretic.

BNP and congestive heart failure

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a peptide hormone secreted chiefly by ventricular myocytes, plays a key role in volume homeostasis. The plasma concentration of BNP is raised in various pathological states, especially heart failure. Many studies suggest that measurement of plasma BNP has clinical utility for excluding a diagnosis of heart failure in patients with dyspnea or fluid retention and for providing prognostic information in those with heart failure or other cardiac disease. It may also be of value in identifying patients after myocardial infarction in whom further assessment of cardiac function is likely to be worthwhile. Preliminary evidence suggests that measuring the plasma concentration of BNP may be useful in fine tuning therapy for heart failure. Artificially raising the circulating levels of BNP shows considerable promise as a treatment for heart failure. With simpler assay methods now available, it is likely that many physicians will measure plasma BNP to aid them in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring of their patients with heart failure or other cardiac dysfunction.

Vasopeptidase inhibitors, neutral endopeptidase inhibitors, and dual inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase

Vasopeptidase inhibitors represent a new class of cardiovascular drugs. They function as a combined angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor, the latter of which potentiates the actions of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) by minimizing its degradation in the circulation. The consequence of such dual inhibition is a synergistic reduction of vasoconstriction and enhancement of vasodilation, thereby serving to more effectively reduce blood pressure. Furthermore, inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) prevents physiologic compensatory responses in vivo seen with NEP inhibition alone. Vasopeptidase inhibitors have also shown to potentiate bradykinin and adrenomedullin, which additionally contribute to cardiovascular regulation. The most extensively researched and promising agents within the class of VP inhibitors is omapatrilat, a mercaptoacyl derivative of a bicyclic thiazepinone dipeptide. It is a single molecule with equal potency and affinity for ACE and NEP inhibition. Although ACE inhibition tends to more selectively benefit high-renin models of hypertension, vasopeptidase inhibition has been shown to be equally efficacious in low-, normal-, and high-renin models. Contrary to NEP inhibition alone, omapatrilat has also demonstrated the ability to significantly reduce blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats, the equivalent of essential hypertension in humans. Studies also suggest that omapatrilat has cardioprotective properties, especially in the setting of congestive heart failure. More specifically, animal models have demonstrated omapatrilat to be more effective than ACE inhibition alone in remodeling the heart and improving its contractile function. Human studies have documented the efficacy of omapatrilat in the treatment of both hypertension and, to a lesser extent, heart failure. Safety concerns (specifically angioedema) are currently being addressed before the widespread utilization of this promising new agent.

Effect of neutral endopeptidase inhibition on the actions of adrenomedullin and endothelin-1 in resistance arteries from patients with chronic heart failure

Adrenomedullin and endothelin are novel peptides that are produced in the blood vessel wall and have contrasting biologic actions. Both may play a pathophysiological role in atherosclerosis and chronic heart failure. It has also been suggested that both peptides may be metabolized by neutral endopeptidase and that pharmacological manipulation of this enzyme may be of therapeutic interest. We investigated the effect of thiorphan, a neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, on the vasodilator response to adrenomedullin and the vasoconstrictor response to endothelin in small resistance arteries taken from patients with heart failure caused by coronary heart disease. Small resistance arteries were dissected from gluteal biopsy samples and studied with wire myography. Thiorphan did not affect the vasodilator response to adrenomedullin in arteries preconstricted with norepinephrine. Maximal responses were 66% (SD 11%) and 72% (8%) in the absence and presence of thiorphan, respectively (n=8). The vasoconstrictor response to endothelin was also unaffected. The maximum vasoconstrictor responses in the absence and presence of thiorphan were 152% (11%) and 132% (12%), respectively (n=8). The values of corresponding -log concentrations of agonist required to effect a 50% response (pD(2)) were 8.52 (0.11) and 8.64 (0.15), respectively. We showed that the inhibition of neutral endopeptidase does not augment the vasodilator and vasoconstrictor activities of adrenomedullin and endothelin, respectively, in small resistance arteries from patients with chronic heart failure. This suggests that neutral endopeptidase inhibition, as a therapeutic strategy, will enhance neither the potentially desirable vascular actions of adrenomedullin nor the potentially unfavorable vascular effects of endothelin-1 in human cardiovascular disease states.

Practical implications of current natriuretic peptide research

Since the original discovery of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) nearly 20 years ago and the subsequent realisation of the existence of a family of natriuretic peptides, there has been considerable progress in the elucidation of the physiological and pathophysiological significance of these peptides. This review has examined two potentially important practical aspects arising from natriuretic peptide research - the significance of measurement of plasma levels of ANP and of brain natriuretic peptide BNP for cardiovascular disease and the therapeutic potential of targeting the natriuretic peptide system. Several situations where the measurement of plasma ANP and BNP may be of benefit in the overall assessment and prognosis of cardiac disease have been discussed. The measurement of plasma levels of these peptides appears to have limited value as a specific diagnostic tool and is unlikely to replace well-established procedures to assess cardiac function. Nevertheless, given the strong negative predictive value, the value of the measurement of plasma natriuretic peptides particularly BNPs, in people with suspected heart disease, rests on the evidence that a normal value indicates a low risk of cardiac impairment. Moreover, a consistently elevated plasma level of BNP after myocardial infarction is associated with a distinctly poor prognosis. In turn, this may help to select those with high plasma levels for subsequent detailed investigation of cardiac dysfunction. This may be an important option, especially where the facilities for the more invasive cardiological procedures are not available. Intriguingly, recent research also suggests the possibility that plasma levels of natriuretic peptides may have an important role in guiding more effective therapy for heart failure. The potent cardiovascular and renal effects of ANP and BNP provide an important therapeutic potential for hypertension and for conditions associated with volume overload. A number of approaches which have been used to enhance endogenous activity of these peptides have been highlighted. The use of the native peptides ANP and BNP may well be valuable in some circumstances, such as in critically ill individuals with congestive heart failure or renal failure. However, the limitations of the use of peptides, especially for long-term treatment, are obvious. In view of this, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of orally active agents to enhance endogenous natriuretic peptides by inhibition of breakdown by neutral endopeptidase. This research has led to the development of vasopeptidase inhibitors - dual inhibitors of both endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme - to enhance endogenous natriuretic peptide function on a background of reduced angiotensin II activity. The broad spectrum of action and the potentially important target-organ protection of these inhibitors offer potential benefits which may well go beyond existing treatment of hypertension and of conditions associated with overt volume overload.