Hyperemic coronary flow after optimized intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation

Current concepts in coronary physiology for the interventionalist

Coronary angiography remains the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of epicardial coronary disease. However, precise quantification of stenosis severity is limited because of the complex three-dimensional geometry of epicardial plaques. To assist the angiographer in lesion assessment, several physiologic measurements have been developed to evaluate stenosis severity, including coronary flow reserve, relative coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. Physiologic lesion assessment can also be an invaluable tool in coronary intervention, evaluating efficacy of angioplasty and stent deployment.

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography - noninvasive diagnostic window for coronary flow reserve assessment

This review focuses on transthoracic Doppler echocardiography as noninvasive method used to assess coronary flow reserve (CFR) in a wide spectrum of clinical settings. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is rapidly gaining appreciation as popular tool to measure CFR both in stenosed and normal epicardial coronary arteries (predominantly in left anterior descending coronary artery). Post-stenotic CFR measurement is helpful in: functional assessment of moderate stenosis, detection of significant or critical stenosis, monitoring of restenosis after revascularization. In the absence of stenosis in the epicardial coronary artery, decreased CFR enable to detect impaired microvascular vasodilatation in: reperfused myocardial infarct, arterial hypertension with or without left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, syndrome X, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In these diseases, noninvasive transthoracic Doppler echocardiography allows for serial CFR evaluations to explore the effect of various pharmacological therapies.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty compared with stent: immediate and 6-month results of the multicenter, randomized Balloon Equivalent to Stent Study (BEST)

BACKGROUND

Balloon angioplasty guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) makes it possible to choose the balloon size according to the true vessel diameter and to detect suboptimal results requiring subsequent stent implantation. The Balloon Equivalent to STent (BEST) study aimed to assess whether this strategy would give the same results as systematic stenting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 132 of 254 patients were randomized to IVUS-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (aggressive PTCA), and 122 were randomized to stenting (stent group). We hypothesized that a difference of <8% in the 6-month angiographic restenosis rate (primary end point) could be considered noninferior. The aggressive PTCA procedure was longer and had a greater use of contrast medium than stenting. In the aggressive PTCA group, crossover to stent was needed in 58 patients (44%). At 6 months, 20 of 119 patients (16.8+/-6.7%) in the aggressive PTCA group and 21 of 116 patients (18.1+/-7.0%) in the stent group had restenosis. The difference was -1.3%, with an upper limit of 95% confidence interval of 7.1% (ie, less than the noninferiority boundary). The in-stent restenosis rate was higher in the stent group (15.5% versus 5%; P=0.02). The differences in minimum lumen diameter, lumen cross-section area, and 1-year event rate were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy of IVUS-guided angioplasty with provisional stenting is feasible and safe. At the cost of a more complex procedure, it reduces the stent rate by half, with similar 6-month angiographic IVUS and clinical outcome compared with stent implantation.

Evaluación y guía terapéutica de las lesiones coronarias intermedias en el laboratorio de hemodinámica

Contrast angiography has been used for nearly five decades to evaluate the severity of coronary lesions. However, when attempting to distinguish between intermediate coronary lesions able or unable to produce ischemia, the technique has several limitations. A large number of patients undergo cardiac catheterization without prior evaluation of coronary perfusion by non-invasive tests. This number is likely to increase in the coming years, because current recommendations favor the invasive treatment of acute coronary syndromes. This has triggered marked interest in new diagnostic techniques capable of assessing the physiological significance of intermediate lesions in the catheterization room. This paper reviews the different techniques currently available for scientifically assessing the significance of such lesions. The advantages and limitations of each are discussed.

Microvascular dysfunction in chronic total coronary occlusions

BACKGROUND

Microvascular dysfunction is defined as reduced coronary flow reserve in the absence of an epicardial stenosis. This study determined its prevalence and relation to regional myocardial function in chronic total coronary occlusions (TCO).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After recanalization and stenting of a TCO (duration, >4 weeks) in 42 patients, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) was measured by intracoronary Doppler. In a subset of 27 patients, intracoronary pressure was recorded to obtain the fractional flow reserve (FFR). In 21 patients, the CFVR was reassessed after 24 hours. CFVR was <2.0 in 55% of all patients. In the subgroup with simultaneous pressure recordings, 52% of patients showed a CFVR<2.0 and a FFR>/=0.75, indicating microvascular dysfunction. Both reduced CFVR and reduced FFR occurred in only 2 patients (7.7%). CFVR and FFR were not correlated (r=0.03). A low CFVR was associated with a higher baseline average peak velocity (35.6+/-16.6 versus 22.4+/-11.5 cm/s; P=0.006). Doppler parameters did not change within 24 hours. Regional dysfunction had no influence on CFVR. Patients with diabetes and/or hypertension had a lower CFVR than those without this comorbidity (1.86+/-0.69 versus 2.36+/-0.45; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Microvascular dysfunction was observed in 55% of TCOs, independent of the impairment of regional myocardial function. Dysfunction was observed more often in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Neither CFVR or FFR alone is appropriate for assessing angioplasty results in patients with a TCO; CFVR should be combined with FFR to differentiate microvascular dysfunction from residual coronary stenosis or diffuse disease.

Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate whether coronary flow velocity reserve (CFR) (the ratio between hyperemic and baseline peak flow velocity), as measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during adenosine infusion, allows detection of flow changes in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) before and after stenting.

BACKGROUND

The immediate post-stenting evaluation of CFR by intracoronary Doppler has shown mixed results, due to reactive hyperemia and microvascular stunning. Noninvasive coronary Doppler echocardiography may be a more reliable measure than intracoronary Doppler.

METHODS

Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during 90-s venous adenosine infusion (140 microg/kg body weight per min) was used to measure CFR of the LAD in 45 patients before and 3.7 +/- 2 days after successful stenting, as well as in 25 subjects with an angiographically normal LAD (control group).

RESULTS

Adequate Doppler spectra were obtained in 96% of the patients. Pre-stent CFR was significantly lower in patients than in control subjects (diastolic CFR: 1.45 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.72 +/- 0.71, p < 0.01; systolic CFR: 1.61 +/- 1.02 vs. 2.41 +/- 0.68, p < 0.01) and increased toward the normal range after stenting (diastolic CFR: 2.58 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.72 +/- 0.75, p = NS; systolic CFR: 2.43 +/- 1.01 vs. 2.41 +/- 0.52, p = NS). Diastolic CFR was often damped, suggesting coronary steal in patients with > or =90% versus <90% LAD stenosis (0.86 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.69 +/- 0.43, p < 0.01). Coronary stenting normalized diastolic CFR in these two groups (2.45 +/- 0.77 and 2.64 +/- 0.69, respectively, p = NS), even though impaired diastolic CFR persisted in three of four patients with > or =90% stenosis. Stenosis of the LAD was better discriminated by diastolic (F = 49.30) than systolic (F = 12.20) CFR (both p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary flow reserve, as measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, is impaired in LAD disease; it may identify patients with > or =90% stenosis; and it normalizes early after stenting, even in patients with > or =90% stenosis.