Procedural results and late clinical outcomes after percutaneous interventions using long (> or = 25 mm) versus short (< 20 mm) stents

Safety and efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated stent in patients with long coronary lesions: The EVOLVE 48 study

Objectives

The EVOLVE 48 study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the SYNERGY 48 mm stent for the treatment of long lesions.

Background

Clinical evidence supporting the use of very long stents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. The bioabsorbable polymer SYNERGY stent has shown good long‐term data in a broad population of patients undergoing PCI.

Methods

Patients with lesion length >34‐ ≤44 mm and reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥2.5‐ ≤ 4.0 mm were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, single‐arm study. The primary endpoint was 12‐month target lesion failure (TLF; composite of target lesion revascularization [TLR], target‐vessel myocardial infarction [TV‐MI], or cardiac death) compared to a prespecified performance goal (PG).

Results

A total of 100 patients with mean lesion length of 35.34 ± 7.15 mm (26 patients with lesion length > 40 mm) and mean RVD 2.72 ± 0.44 mm were enrolled. Moderate to severe calcification was present in 30% of the patients and 89% had pre‐TIMI flow grade 3. The rates of technical and clinical procedural success were 100%. One‐year TLF was observed in 4.1% patients compared to a prespecified PG of 19.5% (95% upper confidence bound = 9.1%; p < 0.0001). Cardiac death and TLR were each observed in one patient, and TV‐MI in two patients treated with SYNERGY 48 mm stent. Between the 1‐2‐year timeframe, TV‐MI occurred in one additional patient. None of the patients experienced a definite or probable stent thrombosis through 2 years.

Conclusions

PCI of long coronary lesions with the 48 mm SYNERGY stent demonstrated good procedural and clinical outcomes through 2 years, supporting its clinical safety and efficacy.

Imaging Characteristics of Mismatch Lesions: An Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis of 1369 Coronary Lesions

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the angiographic and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) characteristics of coronary mismatch lesions.

BACKGROUND

Better understanding about the characteristics of mismatch lesions may help to achieve more accurate lesion assessment and, thereby, to improve the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Angiographic and IVUS data from 1369 lesions were analyzed. Mismatch lesion was defined as the difference between proximal and distal reference lumen diameters of ≥1.0 mm or ≥30% of the distal reference lumen diameter.

RESULTS

The incidence of mismatch lesions was 20.1% (275/1369). Compared to nonmismatch group, mismatch group had longer lesions (21.3 [6.4] mm vs 18.4 [6.4] mm, P < .001) with smaller minimum lumen diameter (0.87 [0.29] mm vs 1.10 [0.31] mm, P < .001) and more severe diameter stenosis (78.8% [9.2%] vs 66.3% [10.3%], P < .001). On IVUS, mismatch group had larger lumen area (18.7 [5.0] vs 15.8 [5.1] mm², P < .001) but lower plaque burden at the proximal reference segment (41.0% [9.2%] vs 45.7% [9.9%], P < .001) and smaller lumen area (4.83 [1.89] vs 7.36 [2.89] mm, P < .001) but higher plaque burden at the distal reference segment (42.9% [10.4%] vs 41.4% [10.1%], P = .023). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that mismatch lesions were frequently accompanied by diffuse lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.83-3.40; P < .001), bifurcation lesions (OR = 5.83; 95% CI: 4.40-7.74; P < .001), and lesions with a low TIMI flow grade (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.08-2.67; P = .022) or severe diameter stenosis (OR = 3.05; 95% CI: 2.10-4.43; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mismatch lesions are quite common and characterized by greater lesion complexity compared with nonmismatch lesions. Further studies may be necessary to address the impact of this lesion type on the outcome of PCI.

Successful Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial Carotid Artery Stenosis Using a 24-mm Long Bare Metal Coronary Stent

BACKGROUND

Intracranial arterial atherosclerosis represents a common cause of stroke. Despite aggressive and optimal medical management, many patients will unfortunately suffer additional cerebrovascular events. The role of endovascular intervention for intracranial atherosclerotic disease continues to be uncertain, particularly in regard to extensive, symptomatic stenosis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present a case of a 42-year-old man with a complex medical history who presented with recurrent ischemic stroke in the ipsilateral hemisphere despite optimal medical management. Given the length of stenosis and the luminal size of the intracranial cavernous and petrous segments of the internal carotid artery, we used a bare metal coronary stent (4.0 mm × 24 mm). This represents one of the longest stents deployed for intracranial disease reported in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates that a long coronary stent might be successfully used to manage extensive intracranial lesions. We also review the efficacy of using 1 very long stent versus multiple overlapping stents, with reference to the coronary angiography literature.

Clinical outcomes after PCI treatment of very long lesions with the XIENCE V everolimus eluting stent; Pooled analysis from the SPIRIT and XIENCE V USA prospective multicenter trials

BACKGROUND

Lesion length has been an important factor in predicting a worse outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI); however, the safety and efficacy of second-generation drug eluting stents in very long coronary lesions has not been validated in large scale randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We performed a patient level pooled analysis of 13,266 patients undergoing planned overlapping stent treatment of very long coronary lesions with the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system from 6 trials evaluating the XIENCE V stent (Spirit II, III, IV, V, Spirit Small Vessel and XIENCE V USA). Patients were divided into two cohorts, a very long lesion (VLL) group (lesions ≥35 mm) and a control group (lesions >24 to <35 mm). The primary outcome measures were Target Lesion Failure (TLF), Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), and Academic Research Consortium (ARC) defined definite and probable stent thrombosis at 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 13,266 patients were included in the pooled analysis of which 2.4% (323 patients with 328 total lesions) had a mean lesion length of 47.1 ± 13.7 mm in the VLL group which were compared to controls comprised of 3.6% of the cohort (482 patients with 500 total lesions) with mean lesion length of 28.1 ± 2.4 mm.There was no significant difference in the rates of TLF between the VVL and control groups (8.9 vs. 10%, P = 0.63), MACE (9.2 vs. 10%, P = 0.74) or stent thrombosis (1.6 vs. 1.5%, P = 0.92) at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of very long coronary lesions, the XIENCE V stent appears as safe and effective as percutaneous coronary interventions for long lesions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Comparison of long versus short ("spot") drug-eluting stenting for long coronary stenoses

We compared spot drug-eluting stenting (DES) to full stent coverage for treatment of long coronary stenoses. Consecutive, consenting patients with a long (>20 mm) coronary lesion of nonuniform severity and indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to full stent coverage of the atherosclerotic lesion with multiple, overlapping stenting (full DES group, n = 90) or spot stenting of hemodynamically significant parts of the lesion only (defined as diameter stenosis >50%; spot DES group, n = 89). At 1-year follow-up, 14 patients with full DES (15.6%) and 5 patients (5.6%) with spot DES had a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; p = 0.031). At 3 years, MACEs occurred in 18 patients with full DES (20%) and 7 patients (7.8%) with spot DES (p = 0.019). Cox proportional hazard model showed that the risk for MACEs was almost 60% lower in patients with spot DES compared to those with full DES (hazard ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.98, p = 0.044). This association remained even after controlling for age, gender, lesion length, and type of stent used (hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 1.00, p = 0.05). In conclusion, total lesion coverage with DES is not necessary in the presence of diffuse disease of nonuniform severity. Selective stenting of only the significantly stenosed parts of the lesion is an appropriate therapeutic alternative in this setting, offering a favorable clinical outcome.

Acute and intermediate‐term clinical outcomes following Heparin coated BX coronary stent implantation in patients with thrombus containing lesions

BACKGROUND

Coronary stenting in acute coronary syndromes might be associated with increased procedural complications and stent thrombosis risk. Heparin-coated stent (HCS) may improve procedural outcomes when treating these high-risk lesions. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of HCS in patients with acute coronary syndromes and thrombus containing lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and January 2002, 49 patients (42 male) with thrombus containing lesions (32 sustained acute myocardial infarction) received HC BX stents (HepaCoat) at our hospital. Procedural, hospital and six-month outcomes and quantitative angiographic analysis data were obtained from all patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 58 +/- 14 years, 45% had multi-vessel disease and 24% were diabetics. Fifteen patients (31%) received a second HCS for sub-optimal results or threatened closure. Procedural success was achieved in 94% of patients. The mean stent diameter and length was 3.2 +/- 0.2 mm and 18.2 +/- 7.4 mm. The mean TIMI flow increased from 1.3 +/- 1.3 to 2.9 +/- 0.3 and the mean diameter stenosis before and after intervention was 84 +/- 21% and 12 +/- 14%. In-hospital and 30-day follow-up were eventually without occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, coronary bypass. At six-months follow-up, cardiac event-free survival was 89.8%, target vessel revascularization was 6.1 and 90% of patients were free of angina.

CONCLUSION

In this series of patients with acute ischemic syndromes associated with visible thrombus, the use of HCS resulted in (1) favorable procedural and six-month outcomes, (2) no incidence of stent thrombosis, and (3) overall good cardiac prognosis at six-month follow-up.

Long-term clinical outcome of patients treated with β-brachytherapy in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Only limited data exist regarding the long-term efficacy of beta-brachytherapy (beta-VBT) in routine clinical practice and the impact of the prolonged (>6 months) combined antiplatelet therapy after beta-VBT. Our aim is to examine the long-term clinical efficacy of routine beta brachytherapy (beta-VBT) followed by indefinite administration of combined antiplatelet therapy in patients at high restenotic risk.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with 65 lesions [de novo: 41, in-stent restenotic (ISR): 24] underwent intracoronary beta-VBT and were followed prospectively. All patients received indefinite administration of aspirin and clopidogrel, underwent routine angiography 6 months later and were followed-up clinically for 43.7 months (range: 32 to 52 months).

RESULTS

Acute success was achieved in 60/61 (98.4%) patients. Lesion length was 36.1 (+/-17.6) mm for the de novo and 22.0 (+/-9.8) mm for the ISR (p=0.001). Stents were implanted in 35/41 de novo and 7/24 ISR lesions (p<0.01). Six-month binary restenosis after successful beta-VBT was 35.9% (23/64). During follow-up patients with de-novo lesions who received a new stent during index procedure had a higher incidence of major cardiac events than patients with ISR lesions without a new stent (log rank test, p=0.02). Acute and late thrombotic events were reported at 6 patients, all with de novo lesions and stent implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-VBT plus stenting in de novo lesions is related to an unacceptable high rate of thrombotic complications and clinical restenosis despite prolonged administration of combined antiplatelet therapy. Brachytherapy remains a reasonable option for patients with ISR lesions until full data from large randomized trials comparing drug eluting stents with brachytherapy are available.

Procedural results and outcomes after extensive stent coverage with drug-eluting stent implantation in single coronary lesions

Longer stent length has remained associated with the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era; therefore, we aimed to determine clinical outcomes after extensive stent coverage with DES implantations in single coronary lesions. We evaluated the data from 99 consecutive patients treated with extensive DES coverage, defined as > or = 50 mm (mean 63.3 +/- 13.2, range 50 to 115), and a concurrent series of 466 patients with < or = 24-mm DES length (mean 18.4 +/- 3.8, range 8 to 24). The periprocedural, 1-, and 6-month outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The baseline characteristics were mostly comparable between the 2 groups, and procedural and in-hospital outcomes were similar. Although the incidence of death and myocardial infarction at follow-up were comparable, the combined end points of target lesion revascularization plus MACEs at 6 months occurred more often with extensive stent coverage. Multivariate analysis revealed stent length to be the only independent predictor of target lesion revascularization plus MACEs. Patients treated with extensive DES coverage had similar procedural success, major in-hospital complications, and death and myocardial infarction at follow-up, but had more combined adverse events because of an overall higher target lesion revascularization rate.

Impact of stent design on clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation

Coronary stents have considerably improved both immediate and late results after coronary angioplasty, by limiting elastic recoil and vascular remodeling, but their use does not eliminate restenosis, caused mainly by neointimal hyperplasia. Stents are now implanted in over 70% of percutaneous coronary interventions. More than 50 coronary stents have already been approved in Europe and over 20 stents are commercially available in the USA, raising the question: which device is best suitable for which lesion? Several in vitro experiments revealed significant differences in expansion characteristics of coronary stents, related to the strut design and metallic composition. Animal studies were performed to determine the influence of stent design on the patterns and extent of neointimal hyperplasia. However, the clinical results of randomized trials comparing stent types in humans have not always reflected laboratory findings. This article is a critical overview of experimental and clinical data concerning the impact of stent design on the early and late clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation.

Drug-Eluting Coronary Stents

The introduction and widespread use of coronary stents have been the most important advancement in the percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease since the introduction of balloon angioplasty. Coronary artery stents reduce the rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis compared to balloon angioplasty. This angiographic restenosis was further reduced with the introduction of drug-eluting stents and hence further reduction in the frequency of major adverse cardiac events. Herein we present a comprehensive and up-to-date review about the use of drug-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent, paclitaxel-eluting stent, and bare metal stent in the treatment of long coronary lesions

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), and the bare metal stent (BMS) for long coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND

The outcome of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in long coronary lesions remains unclear.

METHODS

The study involved 527 patients with de novo long coronary lesions (> or = 24 mm), which were treated with long (> or = 28 mm) SESs (223 lesions), PESs (194 lesions), or BMSs (201 lesions).

RESULTS

Lesions in the SES (36.0 +/- 14.9 mm, P < 0.001) and PES (36.3 +/- 14.5 mm, P < 0.001) groups were longer than those in the BMS group (32.0 +/- 12.3 mm), meaning the two DES groups had longer stented segments than did the BMS group. Six-month angiographic follow-up showed the SES (9.3%, P < 0.001) and PES (21.3%, P < 0.001) groups had lower in-segment restenosis rates than that of the BMS group (42.5%). The rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 9 months was higher in the BMS group (26.6%) than that in the SES (13.0%, P < 0.001) and PES (15.7%, P < 0.001) groups. Posthoc analysis of the two DES groups showed that the in-segment restenosis rate was lower for the SES than that for the PES group (P = 0.002), while the MACE rate was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DESs for long coronary lesions appears to be safe and more effective than the use of BMSs in terms of restenosis and adverse clinical events. SES use was associated with lower late luminal loss and a lower angiographic restenosis rate compared with PES use.

"Full metal jacket" (stented length > or =64 mm) using drug-eluting stents for de novo coronary artery lesions

BACKGROUND

Stented segment length was a predictive factor for restenosis in the bare metal stent era. The objective of the study was to evaluate the medium-term clinical outcome and the potential for adverse effects when very long segments (ie, > or =64 mm of stented length) are treated by drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation, an approach colloquially referred to as a "full metal jacket."

METHODS

Since April 2002, we have used DES as the default stent for all percutaneous coronary interventions. From our prospective institutional database we identified 122 consecutive patients, with de novo coronary lesions, in whom a coronary artery was treated with at least 64 mm of overlapping DES: 81 patients were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents and 41 with paclitaxel-eluting stents.

RESULTS

The mean number of stents per lesion was 3.3 +/- 1.1, and the median stented length was 79 mm (range 64-168 mm). Periprocedural Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 2 patients (1.6%) and subacute stent thrombosis in 1 patient (0.8%). During 1-year follow-up, 5 patients (4.1%), including 3 patients treated for acute MI with cardiogenic shock, died and 10 patients (8.2%) had nonfatal MI (creatine kinase-MB >3 times). The 1-year target vessel revascularization rate was 7.5% and the overall incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 18%. Outcomes in sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents groups did not differ statistically.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of DES for the treatment of diffuse lesions was associated with a low rate of repeat revascularization, irrespective of stent type. No safety concerns were raised at medium-term follow-up.

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Hypothetical Catheter-Based Strategy for the Detection and Treatment of Vulnerable Coronary Plaques with Drug-Eluting Stents

AIM

Extensive efforts are underway to develop methods for the detection and treatment of vulnerable/high-risk coronary artery plaques. We utilized decision analysis to evaluate the hypothetical clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of a catheter-based strategy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Currently, stenotic coronary plaques are treated without regard to vulnerability. In a new strategy, vulnerable coronary plaques are detected with a catheter-based test and treated with a drug-eluting stent, regardless of degree of stenosis. A Markov-decision model was developed to compare the new strategy with current practice. Monte Carlo simulations were performed from a societal perspective, costs were converted to year 2003 U.S. dollars, and future costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of assumptions on variables such as the prevalence of vulnerable plaques and treatment effect. In 60-year-old male patients with coronary stenoses the new strategy would be less expensive and more effective than current practice (37,045 dollars vs 38,257 dollars and 10.23 vs 9.86 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively). The benefits of the new strategy were robust in sensitivity analyses (e.g., if the prevalence of vulnerable plaques in this patient group was 50% or more and the sensitivity and specificity of the new test were at least 0.80).

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with coronary artery stenosis, the detection of vulnerable plaques with a catheter-based test followed by their treatment with a drug-eluting stent could be a less expensive and more effective strategy than current practice. If applied to 1 million such patients in the United States undergoing catheterization, the new strategy would add 370,000 QALYs and save 1.2 billion dollars per year.

New approaches to long lesions

Long coronary lesions, comprising up to 20% of the interventional practice, pose a significant challenge to the interventionalist. Several approaches have been described to treat long coronary lesions with long-term suboptimal outcomes. Atherectomy and laser treatments with or without adjunctive balloon angioplasty have not been shown to be superior to conventional balloon angioplasty alone. Preliminary data with the use of drug-eluting stents in the treatment of long coronary lesions appears to be promising even in small vessels and may eventually become the mainstay treatment of long lesions.

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents

Left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary artery bypass grafting integrated with percutaneous coronary angioplasty (hybrid procedure) offers multivessel revascularization with minimal morbidity in high-risk patients. This is caused in part by the avoidance of cardiopulmonary bypass-related morbidity and manipulation of the aorta coupled with minimally invasive techniques. Hybrid revascularization is currently reserved for particularly high-risk patients or those with favorable anatomic variants however, largely because of the emergence of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, which permits more complete multivessel revascularization, with low morbidity in high-risk groups. The wider introduction of hybrid revascularization is limited chiefly by the high number of repeat interventions compared with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, which occurs because of the target vessel failure rate of percutaneous coronary intervention. Other demerits are the costs and logistic problems associated with performing two procedures with differing periprocedural management protocols. Recently, drug-eluting stents have reduced the need for repeat intervention after percutaneous coronary intervention, and this has raised the possibility that the results of hybrid revascularization may now equal or even better those of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Although undoubtedly effective at reducing in-stent restenosis, drug-eluting stents will not address the issues of incomplete revascularization or the logistic problems associated with hybrid. Uncertainty regarding the long-term effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in many patients, as well as their high cost when compared with those of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, also militates against the wider introduction of hybrid revascularization.

Very long sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary lesions

Long-length stenting has a poor outcome when bare metal stents are used. The safety and efficacy of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in long lesions has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of SES implantation over a very long coronary artery segment. Since April 2002, all patients treated percutaneously at our institution received a SES as the device of choice as part of the Rapamycin Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. During the RESEARCH registry, stents were available in lengths of 8, 18, and 33 mm. The present report includes a predefined study population consisting of patients treated with >36-mm-long stented segments. Patients had a combination of >or=2 overlapping stents at a minimum length of 41 mm (i.e., one 33-mm SES overlapping an 8-mm SES) to treat native de novo coronary lesions. The incidence of major cardiac adverse events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) was evaluated. The study group comprised 96 consecutive patients (102 lesions). Clinical follow-up was available for all patients at a mean of 320 days (range 265 to 442). In all, 20% of long-stented lesions were chronic total occlusions, and mean stented length per lesion was 61.2 +/- 21.4 mm (range 41 to 134). Angiographic follow-up at 6 months was obtained in 67 patients (71%). Binary restenosis rate was 11.9% and in-stent late loss was 0.13 +/- 0.47 mm. At long-term follow-up (mean 320 days), there were 2 deaths (2.1%), and the overall incidence of major cardiac events was 8.3%. Thus, SES implantation appears safe and effective for de novo coronary lesions requiring multiple stent placement over a very long vessel segment.

Distal Shower Embolization During Directional Coronary Atherectomy and Stenting for Diffuse Stenosis of Right Coronary Artery-Current Limitations of Intravascular Ultrasonography for Evaluating Fragile Plaque-

A 74 year-old male with old anterior and inferior myocardial infarctions was treated with staged percutaneous coronary intervention. A chronic total occlusion of the middle segment of the left anterior descending branch was successfully stented during the first stage, and during the second stage, preprocedural intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) revealed that the proximal segment of the right coronary artery was diffusely stenosed by mixed plaque. Directional coronary atherectomy under IVUS guidance was performed, but coronary slow flow appeared during the procedure. After successfully bailing out with intracoronary nicorandil, percutaneous thrombectomy and manual blood pumping, 2 coronary stents were implanted to fully cover the lesion. Quite contrary to expectation, the no-reflow phenomenon appeared just after post-dilatation and a repeat of the same maneuver could not completely recover coronary flow. Plaque fragility could not be predicted from the IVUS examination.

Influence of stent treatment strategies in the long-term outcome of patients with long diffuse coronary lesions

Diffuse coronary lesions (length > 20 mm) are still considered high risk for percutaneous intervention even in the current stent era. We compared the 2-year outcome of patients with long diffuse stenosis treated by three different stent strategies. In addition, we also analyzed the possible factors influencing a favorable late outcome. Our series is constituted by 232 patients with 247 long lesions treated between May 1994 and April 1999; 82 patients received one single long stent (group 1), 71 patients were treated by overlapped multiple stents (group 2), and 79 with multiple nonoverlapped stents (group 3). The mean age was 59 +/- 11 years. There were not significant differences between groups in terms of age, risk factors, clinical presentation, type of lesion, or adjunctive medical therapy. Patients from group 1 had shorter lesions (29 +/- 10 mm) than patients from groups 2 (41 +/- 15 mm) and 3 (36 +/- 14; P < 0.05). Major cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) at 24 +/- 12 months follow-up took place in 39 patients (17%). The probabilities of being free of major events at follow-up were 71%, 78%, and 80% for group 1, 2, and 3 respectively (P = NS). Only three variables were identified as significant predictors of these late events: smaller vessel size, smaller minimal lumen diameter after stenting, and the type of lesion being restenotic as compared with native stenosis. Patients with diffuse lesions treated by single long stents did not have a better late outcome than those who received multiple stents. The best late outcome was observed in those patients who had bigger vessel size, larger poststent lumen dimensions and native lesions, regardless of the stent deployment strategy used.

Drug eluting stents: maximising benefit and minimising cost

A policy of selective implantation of drug eluting stents, in a minority of lesions most likely to benefit, seems to be a rational way to employ this new and currently costly technology.

Randomized comparison of success and adverse event rates and cost effectiveness of one long versus two short stents for treatment of long coronary narrowings

Long stents of high flexibility and low profile have become widely available. Treatment of long coronary lesions by 1 long stent may require less interventional efforts and reduce the rate of restenosis due to a lack of overlapping stent segments. This study sought to evaluate the use of 1 long stent compared with 2 short stents for treatment of long coronary lesions. One-hundred twenty-four patients with a coronary lesion 20 to 40 mm in length, in a vessel 2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter, were randomly assigned to treatment with 1 long stent (GFX II stents or S670 of 24, 30, or 40 mm lengths; n = 62) or 2 stents (GFX II or S670 stents, n = 62) of equal length. Procedural success, interventional costs, as well as long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes were evaluated. Lesion characteristics were similar for the 2 treatment groups. Stent placement was possible as assigned by randomization in 61 of 62 cases (98%) in the 1-long-stent group and 100% of cases in the 2-short-stents group. There was crossover to successful short-stent placement in 1 case. The in-hospital success rate was 97% for the 1-long-stent group and 98% for the 2-short-stents group. Acute angiographic results were similar for both groups after intervention. The angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months was 38.5% in the 1-long-stent group and 37.5% in the 2-short-stents group (p = 0.919). Intervention time was less, and the need for a contrast agent had a tendency to be lower in the long-stent group. Procedural costs were significantly less in the long-stent group. In conclusion, 1 long stent can be used with identical procedural success and adverse event rates as 2 short stents in long, atherosclerotic coronary lesions. The restenosis rate is not reduced by the use of 1 long stent compared with 2 stents. However, long stent placement is highly cost effective.

Six-month angiographic and 12-month clinical follow-up of MultiLink long (25 to 35 mm) stents for long coronary narrowings in patients with angina pectoris

There are limited prospective angiographic data on stent deployment for long coronary lesions. This multicenter prospective study enrolled 120 patients with a single de novo stenosis >20 mm in length, in a native vessel > or =3 mm diameter, suitable for a MultiLink stent 25 to 35 mm in length with additional stent deployment if required. Quantitative angiography before and immediately after stenting and at 6-month follow-up assessed restenosis for the complete lesion and for 5-mm segments of the stented and adjacent nonstented vessel. By 1 year, myocardial infarction had occurred in 3% and target vessel repeat revascularization in 12% of patients. The mean stented length (35.8 +/- 14.6 mm) closely matched mean lesion length (30.1 +/- 13.5 mm). Restenosis to > or =50% diameter loss occurred in 32% of patients, but to > or =70% in only 8%. Of the 147 segments (5 mm in length) with baseline stenosis <25%, only 3 patients (2%) developed restenosis of > or =50%, and only in 1 of these was it > or =70%. Stenting of long narrowings is associated with good clinical outcome and a low rate of severe restenosis. Mildly diseased segments of long lesions covered by a stent rarely became severely narrowed and had negligible influence on the overall restenosis rate. These data support a strategy of full lesion coverage by stent deployment.

Long-term clinical outcomes after coronary angioplasty using long stents in small coronary vessels

The role of coronary stenting in challenging situations, such as small vessels and long lesions, remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the procedural, in-hospital, and long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing angioplasty with long stents in small coronary vessels. We evaluated the procedural success rate and clinical outcomes in 252 consecutive subjects treated by means of the implantation of a single coronary stent in vessels with a mean reference diameter of < 2.5 mm; 128 patients received a short stent (< or = 16 mm) and 124 a long stent (> or = 18 mm). Lesion morphology was more complex in patients treated with long stents (P < 0.05). The mean stent length was 14 +/- 2 mm in the short-stent group and 25 +/- 3 mm in the long-stent group (P < 0.001). The overall procedural success rate (98.4% vs. 97.6%; P = NS) and the rate of major in-hospital adverse events (death, acute myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization; 1.6% vs. 2.4%; P = NS) was similar in the two groups. After 11.7 +/- 7 months of follow-up, there was no difference in the incidence of mortality and myocardial infarction (5% vs. 6.6%; P = NS), but revascularization tended to occur more frequently in the patients treated with long stents (21.7% vs. 13.9%; P = NS). In conclusion, the procedural success rate of single short or long stents in small coronary vessels was similar. Although the incidence of target vessel revascularization tended to be higher in the patients treated with longer stents, 2-year event-free survival was equivalent in the two groups (65% vs. 70%; P = NS).

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with provisional spot stenting for treatment of long coronary lesions

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the approach of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with spot stenting (SS) for the treatment of long coronary lesions.

BACKGROUND

Treating long coronary lesions with balloon angioplasty results in suboptimal short- and long-term outcomes. Full lesion coverage with traditional stenting (TS) has been associated with a high restenosis rate.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 130 long lesions (>15 mm) in 101 patients treated with IVUS-guided PTCA and SS. The results were compared with those of TS in a matched group of patients. Coronary angioplasty was performed with a balloon to vessel ratio of 1:1, according to the IVUS media-to-media diameter of the vessel at the lesion site, to achieve prespecified IVUS criteria: lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) > or =5.5 mm(2) or > or =50% of the vessel CSA at the lesion site. The stents were implanted only in the vessel segment where the criteria were not met.

RESULTS

In the SS group, stents were implanted in 67 of 130 lesions, and the mean stent length was shorter than that of lesions in the matched TS group (10.4 +/- 13 mm vs. 32.4 +/- 13 mm, p < 0.005). The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was similar (5%) for both groups. Angiographic restenosis was 25% with IVUS-guided SS, as compared with 39% in the TS group (p < 0.05). Follow-up MACE and target lesion revascularization rates were lower in the SS group than in the TS group (22% vs. 38% [p < 0.05] and 19% vs. 34% [p < 0.05], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravascular ultrasound-guided SS for the treatment of long coronary lesions is associated with good acute outcome. Angiographic restenosis and follow-up MACE rates were significantly lower than those with TS.