Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions

Interventions in chronic total occlusions with bifurcation lesions: incidence, treatment, and in-hospital outcome

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO) involving bifurcation lesions are a challenging lesion subset that is understudied in the literature. This study analyzed the incidence, procedural strategy, in-hospital outcomes and complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for bifurcation-CTO (BIF-CTO).

METHODS

We assessed data from 607 consecutive CTO patients treated at the Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (ICPS), Massy, France between January 2015 and February 2020. Procedural strategy, in-hospital outcomes and complication rates were compared between 2 patient subgroups: BIF-CTO (n=245=and non-BIF-CTO (n=362).

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 63.2±10.6 years; 79.6% were men. Bifurcation lesions were involved in 40.4% of the procedures. Overall lesion complexity was high (mean J-CTO score 2.30±1.16, mean PROGRESS-CTO score 1.37±0.94). The preferred bifurcation treatment strategy was a provisional approach (93.5%). BIF-CTO patients presented with higher lesion complexity, as assessed by J-CTO score (2.42±1.02 vs 2.21±1.23 in the non-BIF-CTO patients, P=.025) and PROGRESS-CTO score (1.60±0.95 vs 1.22±0.90 in the non-BIF-CTO patients, P<.001). Procedural success was 78.9% and was not affected by the presence of bifurcation lesions (80.4% in the BIF-CTO group, 77.8% in the non-BIF-CTO-CTO group, P=.447) or the bifurcation site (proximal BIF-CTO 76.9%, mid-BIF-CTO 83.8%, distal BIF-CTO 85%, P=.204). Complication rates were similar in BIF-CTO and non-BIF-CTO.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bifurcation lesions is high in contemporary CTO PCI. Patients with BIF-CTO present with higher lesion complexity, with no impact on procedural success or complication rates when the predominant strategy is provisional stenting.

Clinical Outcomes Following Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Bifurcation lesions account for 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions and represent a complex subset which are associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of restenosis [...].

The Ongoing Saga of the Evolution of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From Balloon Angioplasty to Recent Innovations to Future Prospects

The advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been, above all, dependent on the work of pioneers in surgery, radiology, and interventional cardiology. From Grüntzig's first balloon angioplasty, PCI has expanded through technology development, improved protocols, and dissemination of best-practice techniques. We can nowadays treat more complex lesions in higher-risk patients with favourable results. Guide wires, balloon types and profiles, debulking techniques such as atherectomy or lithotripsy, stents, and scaffolds all represent evolutions that have allowed us to tackle complex lesions such as an unprotected left main coronary artery, complex bifurcations, or chronic total occlusions. Best-practice PCI, including physiology assessment, imaging, and optimal lesion preparation are now the gold standard when performing PCI for sound indications, and new technologies such as intravascular lithotripsy for lesion preparation, or artificial intelligence, are innovations in the steps of 4 decades of pioneers to improve patient care in interventional cardiology. In the present review, major innovations in PCI since the first balloon angioplasty and also uncertainties and obstacles inherent to such medical advances are described.

Bioresorbable magnesium scaffold in the treatment of simple coronary bifurcation lesions: The BIFSORB pilot II study

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and healing response of a magnesium‐based bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) in the treatment of simple bifurcation lesions using the single stent provisional technique.

Background

BRS may hold potential advantages in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, however low radial strength and expansion capacity has been an issue with polymer‐based scaffolds. The magnesium BRS may prove suitable for bifurcation treatment as its mechanical properties are closer to those of permanent metallic drug‐eluting stents.

Methods

The study was a proof‐of‐concept study with planned inclusion of 20 patients with stable angina pectoris and a bifurcation lesion involving a large side branch (SB) > 2.5 mm with less than 50% diameter stenosis. Procedure and healing response were evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT). The main endpoints were a composite clinical safety endpoint and an OCT healing index at 1 month (range: 0–98).

Results

Eleven patients were included in the study. The study was prematurely terminated due to scaffold fractures and embolization of scaffold fragments in three cases requiring bailout stenting with drug‐eluting stents. One patient underwent bypass surgery at 3 months due to stenosis proximal to the study segment. All SB were patent for 1 month. One‐month OCT evaluation showed strut coverage of 96.9% and no malapposition. Scaffold fractures and uncovered jailing struts resulted in a less favorable mean OCT healing index score of 10.4 ± 9.0.

Conclusions

Implanting a magnesium scaffold by the provisional technique in nontrue bifurcation lesions was associated with scaffold fracture, embolization of scaffold fragments, and a high need for bailout stenting.

Ten-Year Trends in Coronary Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Prognostic Effects of Patient and Lesion Characteristics, Devices, and Techniques

Background

Despite advances in devices and techniques, coronary bifurcation lesion remains a challenging lesion subset in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluate 10‐year trends in bifurcation PCI and their effects on patient outcomes.

Methods and Results

We analyzed 10‐year trends in patient/lesion characteristics, devices, PCI strategy, stent optimization techniques, and clinical outcomes using data from 5498 patients who underwent bifurcation PCI from 2004 to 2015. Clinical outcomes 2 years after the index procedure were evaluated in terms of target vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) and a patient‐oriented composite outcome (a composite of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization). During the 10‐year study period, patient and lesion complexity, such as multivessel disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and left main bifurcation, increased continuously (all P<0.001). The risk of target vessel failure or patient‐oriented composite outcome decreased continuously from 2004 to 2015 (target vessel failure: from 12.3% to 6.9%, log‐rank P<0.001; patient‐oriented composite outcome: from 13.6% to 9.3%, log‐rank P<0.001). The use of a second‐generation drug‐eluting stent and decreased target vessel failure risk in true bifurcation lesions were the major contributors to improved patient prognosis (interaction P values were <0.001 and 0.013, respectively).

Conclusions

During the past decade of bifurcation PCI, patient and lesion characteristics, devices, PCI techniques, and patient prognosis have all significantly changed. Despite increased patient and lesion complexity, clinical outcomes after bifurcation PCI have improved, mainly because of better devices and more widespread adoption of procedural optimization techniques and appropriate treatment strategies.

Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01642992 and NCT03068494.

Effect of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty on Side Branch Lesion and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with De Novo True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of paclitaxal-coated balloon (PCB) versus conventional balloon (CB) on side branch (SB) lesion and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with de novo true bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

In total, 219 patients with de novo true bifurcation lesions were enrolled and divided into PCB group (102 cases) and CB group (117 cases) according to angioplasty strategy in SB. Drug-eluting stent (DES) was implanted in main vessel (MV) for each subject. All subjects underwent a 12-month follow-up for late lumen loss (LLL), restenosis, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MACEs included cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina requiring admission.

RESULTS

There were no differences in diameter, minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and stenosis for bifurcation lesions between the two groups before and immediately after PCI (P > 0.05). After 12-month follow-up, no differences occurred in MV-MLD and MV-LLL between the two groups (P > 0.05); SB-MLD in PCB group was higher than that in CB group (1.97 ± 0.36 mm vs. 1.80 ± 0.43 mm, P = 0.007); SB-LLL in PCB group was lower than that in CB group (0.11 ± 0.18 mm vs. 0.19 ± 0.25 mm, P = 0.024). Multivariate COX analyses indicated that PCB group had lower MACE risk than CB group (HR = 0.480, 95%CI 0.244-0.941, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

PCB could decrease SB-LLL and MACE risk in patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesion 12 months after single-DES intervention.

Management of calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions

Calcified coronary artery bifurcation lesions (CBL) remain a challenge for the interventional cardiologist. Evidence regarding treatment of CBL is minimal. Optimal plaque modification is the most important step prior to stent deployment. Provisional stenting is the preferred strategy for most bifurcation lesions. However, two-stent strategy should be considered for BL with compromised large SB (>2.5 mm) supplying a large territory, >70% SB stenosis and lesions more than 5 mm long. In this contemporary review article, we present a simplified approach to treating CBL and demonstrate the approach to specific case examples using our newly developed mobile application, BifurcAID.

Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether an active side branch protection (SB-P) strategy is superior to the conventional strategy in reducing side branch (SB) occlusion in high-risk bifurcation treatment.

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of SB occlusion after main vessel stenting followed by the use of specific strategies to prevent occlusion would be beneficial during bifurcation intervention.

METHODS

Eligible patients who had a bifurcation lesions with high risk for occlusion as determined using the validated V-RESOLVE (Visual Estimation for Risk Prediction of Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Intervention) score were randomized to an active SB-P strategy group (elective 2-stent strategy for large SBs and jailed balloon technique for small SBs) or a conventional strategy group (provisional stenting for large SBs and jailed wire technique for small SBs) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by SB vessel size. The primary endpoint of SB occlusion was defined as an angiography core laboratory-assessed decrease in TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade or absence of flow in the SB immediately after full apposition of the main vessel stent to the vessel wall.

RESULTS

A total of 335 subjects at 16 sites were randomized to the SB-P group (n = 168) and conventional group (n = 167). Patients in the SB-P versus conventional strategy group had a significantly lower rate of SB occlusion (7.7% [13 of 168] vs. 18.0% [30 of 167]; risk difference: -9.1%; 95% confidence interval: -13.1% to -1.8%; p = 0.006), driven mainly by the difference in the small SB subgroup (jailed balloon technique vs. jailed wire technique: 8.1% vs. 18.5%; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

An active SB-P strategy is superior to a conventional strategy in reducing SB occlusion when treating high-risk bifurcation lesions. (Conventional Versus Intentional Strategy in Patients With High Risk Prediction of Side Branch Occlusion in Coronary Bifurcation Intervention [CIT-RESOLVE]; NCT02644434).

The efficacy of modified jailed balloon technique for true bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short-, long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes after treatment of true bifurcation lesions using a modified jailed balloon technique (MJBT).

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for true bifurcation lesions has high risk for adverse events. Side branch (SB) occlusion is one of the most serious complications. Therefore, novel strategies to avoid SB occlusion during main branch stenting and to keep its patency are important.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between February 2015 and February 2018, 328 patients with 349 true bifurcation lesions underwent PCI using MJBT. True bifurcation lesions were defined as Medina classifications (1.1.1), (1.0.1) or (0.1.1) lesions. We investigated the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes. Furthermore, angiographic outcomes were assessed at follow-up diagnostic angiography. The mean age of patients was 71.6 ± 9.9 years. Procedural success was achieved in all patients; postoperative SB occlusion was noted in only one patient (0.3%). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was 23 patients (7.0%) in the follow-up period (median 717 days). Target lesion revascularization was performed in 19 patients (5.8%) with 23 lesions (6.6%), and 0.6% of myocardial infarction and 0% of definite stent thrombosis were observed. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 243 patients (74.1%); the percent diameter stenosis in SB was not significantly different between after the index procedure and follow-up angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

This MJBT is safe and effective in preserving SB patency for true bifurcation lesions. Furthermore, long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes after MJBT are feasible.

OCT-guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Bifurcation Lesions

Coronary artery bifurcation lesions remain challenging despite significant advancements in stent technology and development of specific bifurcation stenting approaches. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the intracoronary imaging technique with the highest resolution and can generate automatically contoured lumen areas across the variable geometry of bifurcation lesions. Knowledge of plaque severity and composition facilitates planning of the best strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stenting. In particular, the provisional stent strategy preferred in this context can be modified when there is high risk of side-branch compromise at the ostium after main vessel stenting. OCT is unique because it allows the identification of the site of guide wire crossing, an important determinant of the final result. OCT can also be used to assess the procedural success of new dedicated bifurcation stent technologies and for the evaluation at follow-up of potential predictors of stent thrombosis, including stent malapposition, stent under-expansion and stent-edge dissection. Finally, the development of 3D OCT allows a better evaluation of coronary anatomy — particularly of side branch ostium that is difficult to visualise by 2D OCT — further improving the value of this technique in guiding PCI in these patients.

Modified double-stent strategy may be an optimal choice for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The modified double-stent and provisional stenting strategies have been widely used in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions, but what is the optimization has not been clearly defined. This meta-analysis is to elucidate the benefits from modified double-stent and provisional stenting strategies in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify studies comparing the modified double-stent and provisional stenting strategies in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. The clinical outcomes were divided into early (≤6 months) and late (>6 months) events according to the follow-up duration. The early endpoints included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and the late endpoints also include stent thrombosis in addition to the early endpoints index. The angiographic endpoint was in-stent restenosis. Data were analyzed by the statistical software RevMan (version 5.3).

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies involving 1683 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were included in this meta-analysis, which found that the modified double-stent strategy was associated with a lower risk of cardiac death (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.11-0.78, P = .01), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, P = .01), target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.15-0.63, P = .001), and MACE (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.74, P = .003) compared with provisional stenting in the early follow-up endpoint events, while the risk of cardiac death and stent thrombosis were similar between both strategies (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.31-1.10, P = .09; and OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.15, P = .13; respectively) in the late follow-up endpoint events. There were significant differences between both strategies in myocardial infarction (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.24-0.75, P = .003), MACE (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.31-0.62, P < .00001), and target lesion revascularization or target vessel revascularization (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.25-0.49, P < .00001) between both strategies in the late follow-up endpoint events. The risk of in-stent restenosis favored the modified double-stent strategy (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.43, P < .00001).

CONCLUSION

The modified double-stent strategy is associated with excellent clinical and angiographic outcomes except for the occurrence of cardiac death and stent thrombosis late-term outcome compared with provisional stenting strategy in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. These findings suggest that the modified double-stent strategy can be recommended as an optimization in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.

Balloon embedded stenting: A novel technique for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions, experience in Indian population

Background

Bifurcation lesions account for 15–20% of interventions carried out in a catheterization laboratory. Several techniques have been described for treating bifurcation lesions of which culotte and T-stenting and protrusion(TAP) are commonly used. Both these techniques involve recrossing the struts of primary stent, failing which the flow in second branch which can be impaired and lead to catastrophic events. In this study, we describe a novel balloon embedded stenting technique which can be incorporated with traditional culotte or TAP technique and facilitates conversion to bail out crush in case of such an event.

Methods and results

28 patients who were treated with balloon embedded stenting for bifurcation lesions were included in the study. Angiographic and procedural success were achieved in all the patients. Primary stent could not be recrossed in 1 patient, who was successfully converted to bail out crush using the technique. There were no complications during the procedure. Mean fluoroscopy time and contrast volume was similar to that of conventional culotte and TAP.

Conclusion

The present study suggests that incorporation of balloon embedded stenting into traditional culotte or TAP technique is achievable and can facilitate conversion to bail out crush when required.

Treatment Strategy for STEMI With Bifurcation Culprit Lesion Undergoing Primary PCI: The COBIS II Registry

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

There are limited data on the preferred treatment strategy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with bifurcation lesions. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between 1-stent and 2-stent strategies in STEMI patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The COronary BIfurcation Stenting II is a retrospective multicenter registry of 2897 consecutive patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents from January 2003 through December 2009. Among the registered population, 367 (12.7%) patients had STEMI; of these, a 1-stent strategy was used in 304 patients and a 2-stent strategy in 63 patients; 77.1% of the patients received primary PCI with a first-generation drug-eluting stent. The inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting method was used to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

The median length of follow-up was 38 months. Postprocedural side branch diameter stenosis differed significantly between the 2 groups (1-stent vs 2-stent, 42.7% vs 9.7%; P < .001). After the performance of inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting methods, the rate of MACE was significantly higher in the 2-stent group than in the 1-stent group (HR, 1.85; 95%CI, 1.19-2.87; P = .006), mainly driven by target lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In STEMI patients with bifurcation culprit lesions undergoing primary PCI, the 2-stent strategy had significantly higher rates of MACE than the 1-stent strategy, despite successful treatment of the side branch. However, this result should be interpreted with caution because this study does not reflect current practice.

Prewire channel stent: a novel stent for bifurcation lesions in a pig model

AIMS

Avoiding side branch occlusion is challenging when treating bifurcation lesions. A newly designed stent system called the prewire channel stent (PWCS) with a side channel positioned between the metallic mesh material and the balloon is introduced. We aimed to compare the time taken to position the PWCS against that for a conventional stent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The PWCS and a conventional stent were used in a pig model. The time taken from the starting point with the stent outside the body to reaching the bifurcation of the vessel ready for further procedures such as balloon dilatation through the stent mesh opening and double kissing balloon technique, etc., was compared in the conventional stent and PWCS groups. The time taken in the PWCS stent group included the time from sending the stent from outside the body to the desired position of the bifurcation of the vessels of the heart, releasing the stent and pulling back the balloon (SB time). The time taken in the conventional stent included the time from sending the stent from outside the body to the desired position of the bifurcation of the vessels of the heart, releasing the stent, pulling back the balloon (SB time), and wire exchange (WE time). The SB times for the PWCS and the conventional stent groups were not different (28.5±3.8 vs. 25.25±0.75 seconds, n=4). The PWCS group did not have "wire exchange," and had no WE time, which was 28.5±5.7 seconds in the conventional stent group. The total time spent in the PWCS group was 28.5±3.8 seconds, which was shorter than the 53.75±6.2 seconds (n=4, p<0.05) in the conventional stent group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PWCS makes "wire exchange" in the side branch (SB) unnecessary and it can be as easily manipulated as a conventional stent.

Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using instantaneous wave-free ratio

Background

The provisional side-branch intervention strategy remains the gold standard approach for repair of coronary bifurcation lesions. We performed this study to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of using the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) for physiological assessment in provisional side-branch repair of bifurcation lesions.

Methods

Fifty patients with coronary bifurcation lesions were equally divided into two groups: (I) an iFR-guided side-branch intervention group and (II) a conventional group, in which the operator selected a different interventional method. After the procedure, we performed a six-month follow-up for postoperative ejection fraction (EF) and clinical cardiac outcomes.

Results

Our results showed that the iFR measurement procedure was technically feasible in bifurcation lesions, with no procedural-related complications. Moreover, measuring iFR significantly predicted the side-branch percent stenosis after stenting of the main branch (r = −0.81, p < 0.0001). Compared to the conventional group, the iFR-guided group showed a significantly shorter procedural time (MD = −14.6 min, 95% CI [−27.7, −1.4]) and hospital stay duration (MD = −0.92 days, 95% CI [−1.6, −0.28]). However, no significant differences were recorded between the iFR-guided and conventional groups in terms of postoperative EF (p = 0.9), six-month heart failure class (p = 0.89), or post-interventional angina (p = 0.066).

Conclusion

Using iFR for physiological assessment during the provisional side-branch intervention strategy can reduce the procedural time and length of hospital stay in patients with bifurcation lesions. Larger trials should compare the clinical outcomes of iFR to other physiological assessment methods such as the fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.

ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02785510

Percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions and platelet reactivity

BACKGROUND

Although bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with lower procedural success rates and higher risk of complications, there are little data regarding outcomes after successful bifurcation PCI with contemporary stents and techniques. Whether residual platelet reactivity (PR) affects outcomes differently after bifurcation versus non-bifurcation PCI is also unknown. We studied the association between bifurcation PCI, PR, and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing successful PCI with drug-eluting stents.

METHODS

Patients in the prospective, multicenter ADAPT-DES study were stratified according to whether they underwent bifurcation PCI. Two-year outcomes were compared between groups using Cox proportional hazards models. Target vessel failure (TVF) was defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Among the 8582 patients included in ADAPT-DES, 1276 (15%) had bifurcation PCI. Bifurcation PCI was independently associated with increased risk of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.46, p=0.003), driven by higher risk of myocardial infarction (5.9% vs. 4.6%, p=0.033) and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (13.0% vs. 9.2%, p<0.0001). There was no statistical interaction between PR and bifurcation PCI regarding TVF risk (adjusted p_interaction=0.87). Stenting of both bifurcation branches was associated with the highest risk of TVF (adjusted HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.46 versus non-bifurcation PCI; p_trend<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Bifurcation PCI is associated with a higher risk of 2-year adverse ischemic events than non-bifurcation PCI, a risk that is particularly high when both bifurcation branches are stented, and with HPR conferring similar risk for bifurcation and non-bifurcation PCI.

Clinical outcomes of left main crossover stenting for ostial left anterior descending artery acute myocardial infarction

Percutaneous coronary interventions to ostial left anterior descending artery (LAD)-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were challenging, especially in crossover stenting from left main trunk (LMT) to LAD. The clinical outcomes of ostial LAD-AMI that needed crossover stenting were not well investigated. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of LMT crossover stenting with those of ostial LAD just proximal (jp) stenting. Between January 2009 and March 2016, 1499 patients were diagnosed as AMI in our institution. Among them, 76 ostial LAD-AMIs were included in this study, and divided into 30 LMT crossover stenting (the crossover group) and 46 jp stenting (the jp stenting group). The primary endpoint was major cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The frequency of MACE was comparable between the 2 groups (16.7% in the crossover group and 21.7% in the jp stenting group, P = 0.587). Similarly, the frequency of cardiac death was comparable between the 2 groups (6.7% in the crossover group and 13.0% in the jp stenting group, P = 0.376). The frequencies of TLR (6.7% in the crossover group and 6.5% in the jp stenting group, P = 0.980) and TVR (10.0% in the crossover group and 8.7% in the jp stenting group, P = 0.848) were not significantly different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the clinical outcomes of the crossover stenting were comparable to the jp stenting in the stenting strategy for ostial LAD-AMI. LMT-LAD crossover stenting would be the acceptable strategy for ostial LAD-AMI.

Coronary bifurcation model created using a novel directional heat injury catheter

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to develop a swine coronary bifurcation model.

BACKGROUND

In human coronary bifurcation lesion, atherosclerotic plaques are usually observed in the lateral wall, whereas the flow divider regions are spared. There is currently no suitable coronary bifurcation animal model, on which a new stent can be tested.

METHODS

We developed a novel directional heat injury catheter, which comprised of a non-compliant balloon catheter (diameter: 3.0mm, length: 15mm), and two electrode cables, that were attached to either side of the balloon catheter. The technique was performed on 4 healthy pigs, and assessed in 7 lesions. We inflated the balloon at the main bifurcation branch, following which a high frequency generator was used to transmit heat to the opposite side of the electrode, towards the bifurcation carina (duration: 5min, frequency: 2 times). We performed a post-angiography 28days after the pre-angiography, to observe the distribution of neointima. The neointimal area was divided into the carina side and the opposite side of carina, and the 2 sides were compared.

RESULTS

The neointimal area at the opposite side of the carina was significantly larger than the carina side (1.51±0.40mm² vs. 0.95±0.27mm², p<0.0001). The percentage of area of stenosis on the opposite side of carina was also higher than that on the carina side (55.4±7.0% vs. 34.9±4.2%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed a novel swine coronary bifurcation model using directional heat injury catheter.

A randomised comparison of Conventional versus Intentional straTegy in patients with high Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion: rationale and design of the CIT-RESOLVE trial

INTRODUCTION

The intentional strategy (aggressive side branch (SB) protection strategy: elective two-stent strategy or jailed balloon technique) is thought to be associated with lower SB occlusion rate than conventional strategy (provisional two-stent strategy or jailed wire technique). However, most previous studies showed comparable outcomes between the two strategies, probably due to no risk classification of SB occlusion when enrolling patients. There is still no randomised trial compared the intentional and conventional strategy when treating bifurcation lesions with high risk of SB occlusion. We aim to investigate if intentional strategy is associated with significant reduction of SB occlusion rate compared with conventional strategy in high-risk patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Conventional versus Intentional straTegy in patients with high Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion (CIT-RESOLVE) is a prospective, randomised, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing the rate of SB occlusion between the intentional strategy group and the conventional strategy group (positive control group) in a consecutive cohort of patients with high risk of side branch occlusion defined by V-RESOLVE score, which is a validated angiographic scoring system to evaluate the risk of SB occlusion in bifurcation intervention and used as one of the inclusion criteria to select patients with high SB occlusion risk (V-RESOLVE score ≥12). A total of 21 hospitals from 10 provinces in China participated in the present study. 566 patients meeting all inclusion/exclusion criteria are randomised to either intentional strategy group or conventional strategy group. The primary endpoint is SB occlusion (defined as any decrease in thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade or absence of flow in SB after main vessel stenting). All patients are followed up for 12-month postdischarge.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol has been approved by all local ethics committee. The ethics committee have approved the study protocol, evaluated the risk to benefit ratio, allowed operators with a minimum annual volume of 200 cases to participate in the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure and permitted them to perform both conventional and intentional strategies. Written informed consent would be acquired from all participants. The findings of the trial will be shared by the participant hospitals and disseminated through peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02644434; Pre-results.

Long-term outcome and chest pain in patients with true versus non-true bifurcation lesions treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents in the TWENTE trial

The objective of this study is to assess 3-year clinical outcome of patients with true bifurcation lesions (TBLs) versus non-true bifurcation lesions (non-TBLs) following treatment with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). TBLs are characterized by the obstruction of both main vessel and side-branch. Limited data are available on long-term clinical outcome following TBL treatment with newer-generation DES. We performed an explorative sub-study of the randomized TWENTE trial among 287 patients who had bifurcated target lesions with side-branches ≥2.0 mm. Patients were categorized into TBL (Medina classes: 1.1.1; 1.0.1; 0.1.1) versus non-TBL to compare long-term clinical outcome. A total of 116 (40.4 %) patients had TBL, while 171 (59.6 %) had non-TBL only. Target-lesion revascularization rates were similar (3.5 vs. 3.5 %; p = 1.0), and definite-or-probable stent thrombosis rates were low (both <1.0 %). The target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 11.3 versus 5.3 % (p = 0.06), mostly driven by (periprocedural) MI ≤48 h from PCI. All-cause mortality and cardiac death rates were 8.7 versus 3.5 % (p = 0.06) and 3.5 versus 1.2 % (p = 0.22), respectively. The 3-year major adverse cardiac event rate for patients with TBL versus non-TBL was 20.0 versus 11.7 % (p = 0.05). At 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up, 6.5, 13.0, and 11.0 % of patients reported chest pain at less than or equal moderate physical effort, respectively, without any between-group difference. Patients treated with second-generation DES for TBL had somewhat higher adverse event rates than patients with non-TBL, but dissimilarities did not reach statistical significance. Up to 3-year follow-up, the vast majority of patients of both groups remained free from chest pain.

Evaluation of Different Meshing Techniques for the Case of a Stented Artery

The formation and progression of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in bifurcated vessels may vary depending on the technique used for stenting. This study evaluates the effect of a variety of mesh styles on the accuracy and reliability of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models in predicting these regions, using an idealized stented nonbifurcated model. The wall shear stress (WSS) and the near-stent recirculating vortices are used as determinants. The meshes comprise unstructured tetrahedral and polyhedral elements. The effects of local refinement, as well as higher-order elements such as prismatic inflation layers and internal hexahedral core, have also been examined. The uncertainty associated with individual mesh style was assessed through verification of calculations using the grid convergence index (GCI) method. The results obtained show that the only condition which allows the reliable comparison of uncertainty estimation between different meshing styles is that the monotonic convergence of grid solutions is in the asymptotic range. Comparisons show the superiority of a flow-adaptive polyhedral mesh over the commonly used adaptive and nonadaptive tetrahedral meshes in terms of resolving the near-stent flow features, GCI value, and prediction of WSS. More accurate estimation of hemodynamic factors was obtained using higher-order elements, such as hexahedral or prismatic grids. Incorporating these higher-order elements, however, was shown to introduce some degrees of numerical diffusion at the transitional area between the two meshes, not necessarily translating into high GCI value. Our data also confirmed the key role of local refinement in improving the performance and accuracy of nonadaptive mesh in predicting flow parameters in models of stented artery. The results of this study can provide a guideline for modeling biofluid domain in complex bifurcated arteries stented in regards to various stenting techniques.

Clinical outcome of treatment with or without a final kissing balloon technique for bifurcation in-stent restenosis lesions

BACKGROUND

The treatment strategy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) with bifurcation lesions has not been well explored. We examined the clinical outcomes between final kissing balloon technique (FKBT) after stent implantation and single-stent implantation without FKBT for bifurcation ISR lesions.

METHODS

We identified 115 consecutive ISR with bifurcation lesions among 108 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation. The patients were divided into the FKBT group (34 patients, 35 lesions) and the non-FKBT group (74 patients, 80 lesions).

RESULTS

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade of side branch was significantly greater in the patients with FKBT than those without FKBT after coronary intervention (2.80±0.46 vs. 2.65±0.68, p=0.04), but this difference was attenuated and was no longer statistically significant at the time of follow-up (2.80±0.48 vs. 2.80±0.60, p=0.97). During a mean follow-up of 47.8±23.6 months, there were no significant differences in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In multivariate analysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.92-0.99, p=0.02) was an independent predictor of MACE. Contrast volume (170.71±47.17ml vs. 136.46±55.56ml, p=0.002) and radiation dose (1.44±1.65Gy vs. 0.96±0.46Gy, p=0.02) were significantly higher in the FKBT group than in the non-FKBT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stent implantation without FKBT may be a sufficient treatment strategy for bifurcation ISR lesions.

Comparative Case-Control analysis of a dedicated self-expanding Biolimus A9-eluting Bifurcation stent versus provisional or mandatory side branch intervention strategies in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions

BACKGROUND

In a number of coronary bifurcation lesions, both the main vessel and the side branch (SB) need stent coverage.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the procedural performance and the impact on radiation times (RT) and contrast medium consumption (CMC) of the Axxess™ stent system (Biosensors, Switzerland) treating de novo bifurcation lesions (DBL).

METHODS

One hundred and ten consecutive prospectively enrolled cases (Axxess Group) and 110 age, sex, and lesion location matched controls undergoing mandatory (Group A, n = 56) or provisional (Group B, n = 54) SB intervention were analyzed.

RESULTS

Although more pre-dilatation was performed in the Axxess Group (92.7% vs. 46.4% [Group A] vs. 24.1% [Group B]), and more stents were used (2.4 vs. 1.2 vs. 1.05), RT and CMC were significantly lower in the Axxess Group [7.9 min/129 ml vs. 14.2 min/209 ml vs. 7.8 min/152 ml; P < 0.001]. Final Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction three flow in both branches was significantly more frequent in the Axxess Group (98.2% vs. 94.6% vs. 88.9%; P = 0.02), and post-interventional troponin T elevations were the lowest in the Axxess Group. Eighty one percent of the Axxess-stents could be implanted without technical difficulties. Difficult implantations procedures were mainly related to coronary anatomy. There was no safety concerns (cardiac death, stent-thrombosis) compared to controls. Cumulative 6-months MACE rates were 11% versus 23% versus 25%. TLR rates at 6-months were 5%, 18%, and 15%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Axxess bifurcation stent system procedures were associated with significantly less RT and CMC compared to conventional DBL therapy strategies. Difficult coronary anatomy may hinder successful implantation and a learning curve has to be considered. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A Pilot Study on Culottes versus Crossover Single Stenting for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to compare clinical and angiographic outcomes of planned culottes technique with that of provisional crossover single stenting in the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) with drug-eluting stent (DES).

METHODS

True CBL patients (n = 104) were randomly assigned to either the provisional stenting of the side branch (crossover group) or the culottes group. Additional side branch (SB) stenting in the crossover group was required if there was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow ≤ 1 flow). The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at nine months, including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion/vessel revascularization and in-stent thrombosis. The secondary end point was angiographic in-segment restenosis at nine months.

RESULTS

The rate of MACE at nine months was similar between the crossover and culottes groups (7.7% vs. 7.7%, p = 1.000). Additional SB stenting in the crossover group was required in 3.8% of patients. There was one procedural occlusion of SB in the crossover group. At nine months, the rate of in-segment restenosis was similar in the parent main vessel (0% vs. 1.9%, p = 1.000), main branch (1.9% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.363) and SB (17.3% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.250) between the crossover and culottes groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that there is no significant difference in cumulative MACE or in-segment restenosis between crossover and culottes groups. Larger randomized clinical trials are warranted to re-evaluate the outcomes of the provisional crossover stenting versus the culottes stenting techniques utilizing DES for true CBL.

Bioresorbable scaffolds for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: Critical appraisal and future perspectives

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds have been recently introduced as a novel paradigm for coronary artery disease treatment allowing temporary vessel support and drug delivery without indefinite coronary caging, potentially reducing the long-term limitation of metallic stents. The scientific community has rapidly embraced this concept and bioresorbable devices have been introduced in clinical practice. However, despite the fact that bifurcation lesions represent a large and challenging subset in the field of interventional cardiology, this subgroup of lesions have been avoided in the initial experience with bioresorbable scaffolds and clear recommendations on methodological approaches are lacking. In the present report, we describe the various techniques for bifurcation treatment with bioresorbable scaffolds and the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of this technology in different scenarios, with a glimpse to challenging subsets and possible complications. Therefore, we aim to provide experience based insights and practical guidance for bioresorbable scaffold implantation in bifurcation lesions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Treatment of a Coronary Bifurcation Lesion Using One Dedicated Sirolimus Eluting Bifurcation Stent in Combination with a Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: A Novel Option for Coronary Bifurcation Approach

We present a complex bifurcation lesion treated with a new two-stent strategy combining a dedicated sirolimus eluting bifurcation stent, BiOSS Lim, with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). The advantages of this strategy compared with the conventional two-stent approach are as follows: the dedicated stent protects the carina from being damaged, the large cell at the middle zone of the BiOSS Lim gives possibility to enter easily into the side branch (SB) with any standard size conventional device, and, finally, the additional use of BVS in the SB could have a long-term benefit in terms of restenosis.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Bifurcation Lesions

This article summarizes treatment alternatives for coronary bifurcation lesions. It also reviews current definitions and classifications pertaining to bifurcation lesions and provides an overview of the impact of bifurcation lesions on clinical outcomes.

Plaque morphology predictors of side branch occlusion after provisional stenting in coronary bifurcation lesion: Results of optical coherence tomography bifurcation study (ORBID)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of side branch (SB) ostial stenosis developed after provisional stenting of the main vessel (MV) using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

BACKGROUND

Provisional stenting remains the main approach to treatment of bifurcation lesions; however, it may result in the narrowing of SB ostium. There is little information about underlying plaque morphology of the MV lesion and its potential impact on the SB after provisional stenting.

METHODS

Patients with stable coronary disease with angiographic MV lesion not involving SB were included in a prospective single center study. The primary outcome was significant SB ostium stenosis (SBOS), defined as residual stenosis of >50% after MV stenting.

RESULTS

Thirty bifurcation lesions in 30 patients were analyzed in the study. Poststenting significant SBOS was observed in 30% of patients. The MV lesions with SBOS > 50% were characterized by a higher prevalence of lipid rich plaques (100 vs. 64%, p = 0.040) and spotty calcifications (60 vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Maximal lipid arcs were greater (257° vs. 132°, p = 0.001) and lipid volume index was higher (1380 vs. 574, p = 0.012) in the SBOS >50% group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified maximal lipid arc (odds ratio (OR): 1.014, p = 0.038) and the presence of lipid plaque contralateral to SB ostium (OR: 8.14, p = 0.046) before stenting as independent predictors of significant SBOS after PCI.

CONCLUSIONS

High lipid content of the MV lesion and a contralateral location of lipid in the bifurcation area may contribute to SBOS after provisional stenting. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The story of plaque shift and carina shift

Side branch (SB) occlusion is one of the most serious complications of main vessel (MV) stenting. Although plaque shift has been considered the major mechanism of SB occlusion, recent studies have suggested carina shift to be the more important cause. Considering the recent pressure wire as well as intravascular ultrasonography studies, the relationship between carina shift and plaque shift in SB occlusion can be described as follows. The anatomical compromise of the SB after MV stenting is not as functionally significant as it appears, because it is mostly explained by carina shift, which is not the major cause of functional compromise. Superimposition of plaque shift over carina shift appears to be the mechanism of haemodynamically significant SB stenosis. Plaque is shifted mostly from the proximal MV, which explains why the plaque burden of the proximal MV is a significant risk factor of SB functional compromise or occlusion.

Long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy in coronary bifurcation lesions

The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term outcomes of bifurcation lesions following a rotational atherectomy (ROTA). In this retrospective study, patients that had undergone a ROTA of the bifurcation coronary lesions in Juntendo University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were enrolled between January 2007 and December 2009, and received follow-up for a median duration of 48 months (range, 12-84 months). A total of 337 patients were enrolled. Each patient was treated with an average of 1.2±0.4 ROTA burrs (mean size, 2.9±0.3 mm). Baseline lesion length, reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) prior to the procedure were comparable between the DM and non-DM patients. Furthermore, MLD, %DS and acute gain following the procedure were similar between the two groups. At follow-up, DM patients exhibited a significantly decreased MLD (1.97±0.92 vs. 2.26±0.73 mm; P=0.0038), increased %DS (27.9±21.3 vs. 20.2±13.3%; P=0.022) and late loss (0.70±0.45 vs. 0.42±0.36 mm; P=0.0047) compared with the non-DM patients. Follow-up examinations (mean duration, 52.2±19.4 months) revealed that the DM patients experienced significantly higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) [28 (15.7%) vs. 8 (5.0%); P=0.0011], target lesion (TL) restenosis [46 (25.8%) vs. 20 (12.6%); P=0.0019] and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [36 (20.2%) vs. 19 (12.0%), P=0.039] compared with the non-DM patients. Although the usage of ROTA and drug-eluting stent evidently improved long-term outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions, DM remained an independent risk factor for TLR, TL restenosis and MACE. Therefore, the management of DM in bifurcation lesions treated with ROTA requires increased investigation in future clinical practice.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of True and Non-True Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification- Results From the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stent) II Registry

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the clinical outcomes of patients with different types of coronary bifurcation lesions. We sought to compare long-term clinical outcomes of patients with true or non-true bifurcation lesions who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction [MI], or target lesion revascularization) between 1,502 patients with true bifurcation lesions (51.8%) and 1,395 with non-true bifurcation lesions (48.2%). True bifurcation lesions were defined as Medina classification (1.1.1), (1.0.1), or (0.1.1) lesions. During a median follow-up of 36 months, MACE occurred in 296 (10.2%) patients. Patients with true bifurcation lesions had a significantly higher risk of MACE than those with non-true bifurcation lesions (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.80; P=0.01). Among true bifurcation lesions, Medina (1.1.1) and (0.1.1) were associated with a higher risk of cardiac death or MI than Medina (1.0.1) (HR 4.15; 95% CI 1.01-17.1; P=0.05). During the procedure, side branch occlusion occurred more frequently in Medina (1.1.1) and (1.0.1) than Medina (0.1.1) lesions (11.5% vs. 7.4%, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with true bifurcation lesions had worse clinical outcomes than those with non-true bifurcation lesions. Procedural and long-term clinical outcomes differed according to the type of bifurcation lesion. These findings should be considered in future bifurcation studies.

Coronary bifurcation lesions: Present status and future perspectives

Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) are challenging and associated with a higher rate of adverse events than non-bifurcation lesions. In the era of drug-eluting stents, 2 primary interventional strategies for treating CBL include the complex strategy the main vessel (MV) and side-branch (SB) stenting, and the simple strategy MV stenting combined with provisional SB stenting. The meta-analysis of the simple vs. complex strategies demonstrated an increased incidence of myocardial infarction in the complex strategy. Likewise, the Tryton dedicated bifurcation stents, as compared with the simple strategy, increased the rate of myocardial infarction. In contrast, the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV demonstrated that event rates were not significantly different comparing the simple vs. complex strategies in true bifurcation lesions involving a large SB. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a powerful catheter based tool for the functional assessment of a stenosis, but the role of FFR on the long-term outcomes of patients with CBL has not been studied. Given the recent evidence that Tryton stents (a dedicated bifurcation stent) increased event rates, and the lack of benefit from using 2-stent techniques (the Nordic Baltic Bifurcation Study IV) in true CBL, assessing the FFR of the SB seems now of outmost importance, but randomized data are lacking. An intravascular study showed that kissing balloon inflation (KBI) significantly reduced SB stenosis, restored stent lumen at the carina, and expanded stent in the proximal segment. However, a recent randomized study showed no significant benefit of routine KBI. This review highlights current concepts and future perspectives in patients with CBL.

Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography findings in patients with bifurcated lesions undergoing provisional stenting

AIMS

Bifurcations represent challenging lesions which may benefit from improved understanding of stent-related vessel complications. Since optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows us to detect post-stenting vessel injuries, we sought to assess the geographic pattern of stent-related complications occurring during provisional stenting of bifurcated lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with bifurcated lesions treated by provisional stenting and undergoing intra-procedural OCT assessment were enrolled. OCT images were acquired with the aim of guiding the percutaneous coronary intervention but were re-analysed off-line for the present study. The stented bifurcation was divided into four segments [three in the main vessel (MV) and one in the side branch (SB)]. The following acute post-stenting vessel injuries/complications at the different bifurcation segments were evaluated: (i) stent under-expansion, (ii) stent malapposition, (iii) stent edge dissection, (iv) side-branch ostium dissection, (v) tissue prolapse, (vi) intracoronary thrombus, and (vii) in-stent dissection. A total of 55 bifurcation lesions undergoing provisional stenting were analysed. At least one OCT complication was detectable in all cases. Across different bifurcation sites, significant differences in the occurrence of stent complications were observed. In particular, stent malapposition was more common at the proximal MV segment (P < 0.001), while tissue prolapse was more common at the distal MV segment (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In bifurcated interventions, OCT often detects vessel injuries/stent complications, which tend to have a specific geographical distribution. In particular, stent malapposition is more common at the proximal MV and tissue prolapse at the distal MV segment.

Association of baseline C-reactive protein levels with periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous bifurcation intervention: a CACTUS study subanalysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the predictive value of C-reactive protein (CRP) on periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI), evaluated by creatine kinase-myocardial band isoform (CK-MB) elevation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions is actually unknown.

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation as assessed by CRP has been associated with averse events after DES implantation. After PCI, the occurrence of PMI is common and has also been associated with worse outcomes. Finally, bifurcations are frequently encountered anatomically complex lesions which the treatment is associated with higher complication rate compared with simple lesions.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients (66 ± 10 years, 70 men) from the Coronary bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-eluting stents (CACTUS) trial who had baseline CRP dosage and both baseline and postprocedural CK-MB measurement were included.

RESULTS

A complex bifurcation strategy was implemented in 53 (55%) patients, and angiographic success was achieved in all but two (2%) patients. Periprocedural myocardial necrosis (increase of CK-MB between one and three times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) was observed in 12 (13%) patients, and four (4%) patients had PCI-related myocardial infarction (increase of CK-MB more than three times ULN). Notably, progressively higher CRP levels were observed in patients with different increase in CK-MB (P = 0.041). Moreover, CRP >1 mg/L significantly predicted CK-MB rise (odds ratio 5.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5-4.3, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of true coronary bifurcations treated by DES, baseline CRP levels were significantly associated with both the incidence and the extent of PMI.

Personal Experience with Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Bifurcations

Bioresorbable scaffolds represent a promising new technology in the field of percutaneous coronary interventions. The concept of the eventual resorption of the scaffold pertains to multiple theoretical advantages that may hold true particularly in bifurcation lesions - no permanent caging of the coronary artery, avoidance of acquired device malapposition and delayed hypersensitivity reactions, no permanent metallic stent protrusion in the main branch, etc. The worldwide experience with the use of bioresorbable scaffolds is limited. In our experience of selected bifurcation lesions, a provisional approach using one-scaffold has excellent results. Two-scaffold techniques appeared feasible. Our data support the exploration of the use of bioresorbable scaffolds in more challenging coronary substrates like bifurcations. Prospective registries and ideally randomised trials should assess whether the theoretical benefits of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) in bifurcation lesions can produce sustainable good clinical outcomes.

Clinical outcomes after zotarolimus and everolimus drug eluting stent implantation in coronary artery bifurcation lesions: insights from the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial

OBJECTIVE

We investigated clinical outcomes after treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with second generation drug eluting stents (DES).

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

Multicentre study.

PATIENTS

All comers study with minimal exclusion criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were treated with either zotarolimus or everolimus eluting stents. The patient population was divided according to treatment of bifurcation or non-bifurcation lesions and clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Clinical outcomes within 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 2265 patients were included in the present analysis. Two-year follow-up data were available in 2223 patients: 1838 patients in the non-bifurcation group and 385 patients in the bifurcation group. At 2-year follow-up the bifurcation and the non-bifurcation lesion groups showed no significant differences in terms of cardiac death (2.3 vs 2.1, p=0.273), target lesion failure (9.7% vs 13.8%, p=0.255), major adverse cardiac events (11.5% vs 15.1%, p=0.305), target lesion revascularisation (4.7% vs 6.0%, p=0.569), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (1.6% vs 1.8%, p=0.419).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of second generation DES for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions was associated with similar long term mortality and clinical outcomes compared with non-bifurcation lesions.

Long-term clinical outcomes of the one-stent technique versus the two-stent technique for non-left main true coronary bifurcation disease in the era of drug-eluting stents

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the long-term major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) between the one-stent technique (stenting only the main branch) and the two-stent technique (stenting of both the main and side branches) for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era. Therefore, we investigated this issue using the large nationwide coronary bifurcation registry.

METHODS

The 1,147 patients with non-left main coronary true bifurcation lesions underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the Korea Coronary Bifurcation Stent (COBIS) registry. All patients were stratified based on the stent placement technique: one stent (n = 898) versus two stents (n = 249). MACE, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat vessel and lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR), were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 20 months. The MACEs did not differ between the 2 groups. Findings from the one-stent group were similar to those of the two-stent group in composite of death, MI, or TVR, based on analysis by crude, multivariate Cox hazard regression model, inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (hazard ratio [HR] 0.911, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.614-1.351; HR 0.685 95% CI 0.381-1.232; HR 1.235, 95% CI 0.331-4.605, respectively). In further analysis with propensity score matching, the overall findings were consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study indicate that the one-stent technique was not inferior to the two-stent technique for the treatment of non-left main true coronary bifurcation lesions in terms of long-term MACEs.

Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes between classic crush and modified mini-crush technique in coronary bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes between modified mini-crush (modi-MC) technique with classic crush (crush) technique for treatment of bifurcation lesions.

BACKGROUND

The modi-MC technique showed excellent procedural success and favorable 9-month clinical outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2005 to November 2009, we enrolled patients with de novo bifurcation lesions treated with modi-MC (n = 112 lesions in 111 patients) and crush technique (n = 69 lesions in 67 patients). Primary endpoint was rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. The modi-MC technique showed a significantly higher success rate of final kissing balloon inflation (84.1 vs. 98.2%, P = 0.001). After 3 years, MACE rate was significantly lower in the modi-MC group (25.4 vs. 12.6%, P = 0.030). The incidence of all-cause death was 7.5 vs. 2.7% (P = 0.087), MI was 4.5 vs. 1.8% (P = 0.290), TLR was 17.4 vs. 8.9% (P = 0.093) and stent thrombosis was 3.0 vs. 1.8% (P = 0.632) in the crush and modi-MC groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified mini-crush technique showed more favorable 3-year clinical outcomes compared to the classic crush technique.