Adverse cutaneous drug reactions in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection

A Phase I Study of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Passive Immunotherapy with Caprine Anti-HIV Antibodies,PEHRG214, in HIV-1--Infected Individuals

PURPOSE

To establish the pharmacokinetics and safety of single-dose polyclonal caprine anti-HIV antibodies ((PE)HRG214)in HIV-1-infected individuals.

DESIGN

A phase 1, open-label, nonrandomized, dose-escalating study.

METHOD

HIV-1-infected patients with CD4+ T-cell counts of < or =200 cells/microL and plasma HIV viral load (VL)of > or =5,000 copies/mL received a single intravenous dose of HRG. Dosing began at 6,000 U/kg HRG with proposed step-wise escalation to 96,000 U/kg.

RESULTS

Eleven males were enrolled; median CD4+T-cell count and VL were 96 cells/microL and 126,200 copies/mL, respectively. HRG exhibited linear pharmacokinetics across the dosing range studied. The mean terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2)) was 136.6 +/- 44.6 hours (range, 52.6-198 h). Serum sickness occurred in one 48,000 U/kg HRG recipient. One 6,000 U/kg and two 24,000 U/kg HRG recipients developed a mild rash. Between baseline and day 60, VL remained unchanged (n = 6), increased by 0.67 log(10) copies/mL (n = 1), or declined by 0.34-1.55 log(10) copies/mL (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Single-dose HRG exhibited linear kinetics and a long half-life. Although numbers in each dosing group were very small (n = 3), HRG was generally well tolerated in doses below 48,000 U/kg. Multiple dosing with HRG in the HIV-salvage setting may be complicated by immune-complex formation.

HIV infection predisposes skin to toxic epidermal necrolysis via depletion of skin-directed CD4⁺ T cells

BACKGROUND

A greater incidence of adverse cutaneous drug eruptions, including toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), occurs among HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine if immunophenotypical differences exist in the inflammatory infiltrates of TEN lesions from HIV-infected individuals versus noninfected individuals.

METHODS

The inflammatory infiltrates in 12 cases of TEN from HIV-positive patients were characterized and compared with the infiltrates present in 12 cases of TEN from HIV-negative patients.

RESULTS

TEN infiltrates consisted of CD3, CD4, and CD8 immunoreactive T lymphocytes in both the dermis and epidermis. HIV infection was associated with an 8-fold increase in the ratio of CD8(+) to CD4(+) T cells infiltrating the dermis (P = .006) and a decrease in the number of dermal CD4(+) cells (P = .044). There was also a significant decrease in the ratio of CD25(+) to CD4(+) cells in the epidermis of HIV-infected skin (P = .011).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

A decrease in the number of skin-directed CD4(+) cells and an increase in the ratio of CD8(+) to CD4(+) cells exists in TEN lesions among HIV-infected individuals and likely contribute to an increased risk of developing drug reactions because of the loss of skin-protective CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells.

Detection and quantification of drug-specific T cells in penicillin allergy

Drug allergic reactions presenting as maculo-papular exanthema (MPE) are mediated by drug-specific T cells. In this study, the frequency of circulating specific T cells was analyzed by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunospot assay in 22 patients with an allergic MPE to amoxicillin (amox). Amox-specific circulating T cells were detected in 20/22 patients with frequencies ranging from 1 : 8000 to 1 : 30 000 circulating leucocytes. No reactivity was observed in 46 control patients, including 15 patients with immunoglobulin E-mediated allergy to amoxicillin, 11 patients with a history of drug-induced MPE but tolerant to amoxicillin and 20 healthy individuals. Furthermore, amox-specific T cells were still detectable several years after the occurrence of the allergic reaction even after strict drug avoidance. Finally, analysis of drug-specific T cells in one patient allergic to ticarcillin (a penicillin antibiotic distinct from amox) revealed the presence of IFN-gamma-producing T cells reactive to ticarcillin and several other betalactam antibiotics, suggesting that the IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay is able to detect T cell cross-reactivity against chemically related drugs. These findings confirm that drug-induced MPE is associated with the presence of specific T cells in blood and further suggest that the IFN-gamma ELISPOT is a sensitive assay which could improve the diagnosis of betalactam allergy.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to antimicrobials in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Adverse reactions to medication are significant contributors to morbidity and mortality in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Cutaneous events not only constitute a significant portion of these reactions, they may also herald developing systemic reactions such as hemato-, nephro-, and hepatotoxicity. The identification of cutaneous adverse reactions and drug culprits and the proper management of reactions are of paramount importance for these patients. This review focuses specifically on adverse cutaneous reactions to antimicrobials that are commonly used in the management of patients with HIV infection.

Facteurs de risque de syndrome d'hypersensibilité à l'Abacavir en pratique clinique de routine

Abacavir (ABC) is a generally well-tolerated NRTI. However, up to 5% of patients may develop hypersensitivity syndrome (HSS) within the first weeks of treatment. The objectives of this study were to describe the side effects of ABC, to evaluate the incidence of the ABC-HSS, and to identify the risk factors of HSS after first exposure to ABC in a cohort of patients followed up in a university HIV clinic.

METHODS

The charts of all HIV-infected patients who started ABC between February 1998 and May 2002 were reviewed. HSS was defined as the onset, within 8 weeks of ABC initiation, of either a skin rash associated with at least one of the following symptoms (fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, respiratory symptoms, myalgia, malaise) or at least three of the above symptoms in the absence of rash. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors of HSS.

RESULTS

Of the 191 patients studied (134 M, 57 F, mean age 39 years), 53 (27.8%) presented with manifestations that were regarded as potential side-effects of ABC. Ten (5.2%) developed HSS, none of whom died. Two factors were independently associated with an increased risk of HSS: history of allergy to nevirapine (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.6-40.5, p = 0.02), and being naïve to ART (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.2-28.5, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study "in the real world" confirms that the incidence of ABC-induced HSS is of about 5%. It also confirms that HSS occurs more frequently in patients with a history of allergy to nevirapine and in ART-naïve patients.

Allergic and Nonallergic Drug Reactions

Allergic drug reactions may be difficult to distinguish from nonallergic reactions. In this article, we review a pragmatic approach to the management of adverse drug reactions on the basis of knowledge of the classification and patterns of these reactions. Algorithms for management of patients with a previous adverse drug reaction who require treatment for the same indication, and the approach to a patient who experiences a drug reaction while on multiple drugs, are presented.

Cellular and molecular pathophysiology of cutaneous drug reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions to drugs can cause a variety of skin diseases like maculopapular, bullous and pustular eruptions. In recent years increasing evidence indicates the important role of T cells in these drug-induced skin diseases. Analysis of such drug-specific T cell clones has revealed that drugs can be recognized by alpha beta-T cell receptors, not only if bound covalently to peptides, but also if the drug binds in a rather labile way to the presenting major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-peptide. This presentation is sufficient to stimulate T cells. In maculopapular exanthema (MPE), histopathological analysis typically shows a dominant T cell infiltration together with a vacuolar interface dermatitis. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate the presence of cytotoxic CD4+ and to a lesser degree of CD8+ T cells, which contain perforin and granzyme B. They are close to keratinocytes that show signs of cell destruction. Expression of Fas ligand is barely detectable, suggesting that cytotoxic granule exocytosis may be the dominant pathway leading to keratinocyte cell damage. While in MPE, the killing of cells seems to be predominantly mediated by CD4+ T cells, patients with bullous skin disease show a strong CD8+ T cell migration to the epidermis. This is probably due to a preferential presentation of the drug by MHC class I molecules, and a more extensive killing of cells that present drugs on MHC class I molecules. This might lead to bullous skin diseases. In addition to the presence of cytotoxic T cells, drug-specific T cells also orchestrate the inflammatory skin reaction through the release and induction of various cytokines [i.e. interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma] and chemokines (RANTES, eotaxin or IL-8). The increased expression of these mediators seems to contribute to the generation of tissue and blood eosinophilia, a hallmark of many drug-induced allergic reactions. However, in acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (a peculiar form of drug allergy), neutrophils represent the predominant cell type within pustules, probably due to their recruitment by IL-8 secreting drug specific T cells and keratinocytes.

Hyperpigmentation due to pyrimethamine use

Pyrimethamine is used for the treatment of toxoplasmosis and the prophylaxis of malaria. Among the well-documented side effects are megaloblastic anemia, leukopenia, thrombopenia, rash, vomiting, and diarrhea. Hyperpigmentation is a very rare side effect. In some patients, associated HIV infection makes it difficult to distinguish the reasons for the etiology. We herein describe an HIV-negative patient who developed hyperpigmentation after pyrimethamine use.

T cells in drug allergy

In recent years, increasing evidence has indicated an important role for T cells in various drug-induced diseases. A detailed analysis of patients with various drug allergies revealed the existence of drug-specific T cells in the circulation or in eluate from skin infiltration in bullous, pustular, and maculopapular drug eruptions. The drug-specific T cells use the ab-T cell receptor CD4+ or CD8+ and react with drugs acting as haptens (covalently bound to larger molecules, such as penicillins), but also recognize drugs if they are bound only in a labile way to major histocompatibility complex molecules (noncovalent drug presentation). Functional analysis revealed a predominant IL-5 production by drug-specific CD4+ T cells in maculopapular exanthema (MPE) and bullous skin diseases, while patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis have a peculiar T cell subset secreting high amounts of IL-8. Moreover, in MPE CD4+, perforin+ T cells were found in vitro and in immunohistology that had cytotoxic potential and killed keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo.

Management of cutaneous drug reactions

Drugs are potent chemicals that often have effects in the body beyond the desired action. These effects may range from mild and expected side effects to dramatic and life-threatening anaphylaxis. Adverse drug reactions account for between 2% and 6% of hospital admissions and may prevent administration of otherwise effective therapeutic agents. Cutaneous and mucocutaneous eruptions are the most common adverse reactions to oral or parenteral drug therapy, and the spectrum ranges from transitory exanthematous rash to the potentially fatal toxic epidermal necrolysis. Different mechanisms, including both immunologic and nonimmunologic, are responsible for cutaneous adverse drug reaction. The treatment of cutaneous drug eruptions essentially rests on accurate history, a thorough physical examination, discontinuation of the offending drug, and supportive care. The management of a cutaneous drug eruption is very much individualized, based on the clinical setting. This review aims to provide a general approach to the patient with a presumed cutaneous drug reaction.