Should we refuse requests for complementary therapies?

Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: a review of qualitative and quantitative studies

BACKGROUND

Many people use complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). It is estimated that over 50% of patients that require health care use CAM either in conjunction with, or separate from, conventional health care. Despite the popular use of CAM, patients do not always inform their conventional medicine health carers of their CAM use. The medical practitioner is in most cases the first health care professional a person contacts concerning a health care matter, and needs to have a full history of a health problem to understand and provide optimum care. This literature review aims to provide an understanding of the degree to which patients disclose their use of CAM to their medical practitioners, and their reasons for not doing so.

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search identified 12 studies published between 1993 and 2002 that examined what percentage of consumers did not disclose to their medical practitioners their use of CAM, and their reasons for not doing so.

RESULTS

The rate of non-disclosure of those using CAM is as high as 77% in some studies. The main reasons patients provided for not disclosing their use of CAM to their medical practitioners were concerns about a negative response by the practitioners, the belief that the practitioner did not need to know about their CAM use, and the fact that the practitioner did not ask.

DISCUSSION

The pre-conceptions patients have that influence their non-disclosure may be based on three issues. First, beliefs and concerns that influence their decision-making, second personal experiences in their consultations with medical practitioners, and third, the desire for more control over their health care. Medical practitioners need to acknowledge the concerns and beliefs of patients in making their health care decisions, and work with patients so that the use of CAM is acknowledged and the patients' needs, beliefs and concerns respected.

Ethical dimensions in the borderland between conventional and complementary/alternative medicine

Consumer enthusiasm for complementary and alternative medicine presents complex challenges for conventional Western biomedically dominated health care systems and for those who practice within them. In particular, this trend forces new ethical dilemmas related to how we create consensus about the nature of ethical clinical practice and what constitutes evidence sufficient for public health policy. In this paper, we examine the historical context into which complementary and alternative medicine has been introduced, and consider the ethical and scientific challenges with which it confronts mainstream health systems.

Complementary therapy and cancer: decision making by patients and their physicians setting a research agenda

An invitational meeting, entitled Complementary and Alternative Therapy: Decision Making by Cancer Patients and Their Physicians, brought together Canadian health care providers and researchers who had expertise in patient-physician communication with those who were knowledgeable about complementary therapy and cancer. The aim was to build on the existing knowledge base in both fields in order to determine the unanswered questions, the most important questions, and what methods can be applied for answering these questions. The interdisciplinary group employed a step-wise collaborative process to develop a suggested research agenda regarding decision making by physicians and their cancer patients regarding complementary therapy. The four themes identified are establishment of a registry for complementary therapy usage for cancer care; communication; outcomes measurement; and models of integration. It is hoped that these themes will be considered worthy of support by funding agencies and worthy of investigation by researchers.