1
|
From Belly to Brain: Targeting the Ghrelin Receptor in Appetite and Food Intake Regulation. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18020273. [PMID: 28134808 PMCID: PMC5343809 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18020273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Ghrelin is the only known peripherally-derived orexigenic hormone, increasing appetite and subsequent food intake. The ghrelinergic system has therefore received considerable attention as a therapeutic target to reduce appetite in obesity as well as to stimulate food intake in conditions of anorexia, malnutrition and cachexia. As the therapeutic potential of targeting this hormone becomes clearer, it is apparent that its pleiotropic actions span both the central nervous system and peripheral organs. Despite a wealth of research, a therapeutic compound specifically targeting the ghrelin system for appetite modulation remains elusive although some promising effects on metabolic function are emerging. This is due to many factors, ranging from the complexity of the ghrelin receptor (Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor, GHSR-1a) internalisation and heterodimerization, to biased ligand interactions and compensatory neuroendocrine outputs. Not least is the ubiquitous expression of the GHSR-1a, which makes it impossible to modulate centrally-mediated appetite regulation without encroaching on the various peripheral functions attributable to ghrelin. It is becoming clear that ghrelin’s central signalling is critical for its effects on appetite, body weight regulation and incentive salience of food. Improving the ability of ghrelin ligands to penetrate the blood brain barrier would enhance central delivery to GHSR-1a expressing brain regions, particularly within the mesolimbic reward circuitry.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu R, Wang Z, Peng Q, Zou H, Wang H, Yu X, Jing X, Wang Y, Cao B, Bao S, Zhang W, Zhao S, Ji H, Kong X, Niu Q. Effects of GHRP-2 and Cysteamine Administration on Growth Performance, Somatotropic Axis Hormone and Muscle Protein Deposition in Yaks (Bos grunniens) with Growth Retardation. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0149461. [PMID: 26894743 PMCID: PMC4760683 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) and cysteamine (CS) administration on growth performance in yaks with growth retardation and try to elucidate its regulatory mechanisms. Trial 1, thirty-six 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks (body weight 38–83.2 kg) were randomly chosen for body weight and jugular blood samples collection. The relationship between body weight and serum GHRH (P < 0.05, R = 0.45), GH (P < 0.05, R = 0.47), IGF-1 (P < 0.05, R = 0.62) was significantly correlated in yaks colonies with lighter body weights. Trial 2, fifteen 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks with growth retardation (average body weight 54.8 ± 8.24 kg) were randomly selected and assigned to negative control group (NG), GHRP-2 injection group (GG) and cysteamine feeding group (CG), with 5 yaks per group. Another five 1-year-old Qinghai high plateau yaks with normal growth performance (average body weight 75.3 ± 2.43 kg) were selected as positive control group (PG). The average daily gain (ADG) of the GG and CG were significantly higher than those in the PG and NG (P < 0.05). Both GHRP-2 and CS administration significantly enhanced the myofiber diameter and area of skeletal muscle (P<0.05). GHRP-2 significantly enhanced the serum GH and IGF-1 levels (P < 0.05), and up-regulated GHR, IGF-1 and IGF-1R mRNA expression in the liver and skeletal muscle (P < 0.05), enhanced the mRNA expression of PI3K, AKt and mTOR in the skeletal muscle (P<0.05). CS significantly reduced the serum SS levels and the hypothalamus SS mRNA expression (P < 0.05), and enhanced GHR and IGF-1 mRNA expression in the liver (P < 0.05), decreased the mRNA expression of muscle atrophy F-box (Atrogin-1) and muscle ring finger 1 (MuRF1) mRNA (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Growth retardation in yaks was primarily due to somatotropic axis hormones secretion deficiency. Both GHRP-2 and CS administration can accelerate growth performance and GH, IGF-1 secretion in yaks with growth retardation. GHRP-2 enhanced muscle protein deposition mainly by up-regulated the protein synthesis pathways, whereas CS worked mainly by down-regulated the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Hu
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Zhisheng Wang
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
- * E-mail:
| | - Quanhui Peng
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Huawei Zou
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Hongze Wang
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoqiang Yu
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoping Jing
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Culture and Safety Production in Cattle in Sichuan, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Yixin Wang
- Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China
| | - Binghai Cao
- College of Animal Science and Technology, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shanke Bao
- Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Haibei, Qinghai, P.R. China
| | - Wenhua Zhang
- Ningxia Xiahua Muslim Food Co. Ltd., Zhongwei, Ningxia, P.R. China
| | - Suonan Zhao
- Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Haibei, Qinghai, P.R. China
| | - Hanzhong Ji
- Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Haibei, Qinghai, P.R. China
| | - Xiangying Kong
- Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Institute, Haibei, Qinghai, P.R. China
| | - Quanxi Niu
- Ningxia Xiahua Muslim Food Co. Ltd., Zhongwei, Ningxia, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|