Endovascular stent-graft repair for penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer in the infrarenal abdominal aorta

Endovascular Treatment of a Contained Rupture of a Penetrating Aortic Ulcer in a Young Patient

Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) is a component of acute aortic syndromes (AASs), encompassing a range of potentially life-threatening aortic conditions such as dissection, intramural hematoma (IMH), and PAU itself. Ruptured PAU constitutes an emergency requiring surgical intervention. Here, we present a case involving a 47-year-old male patient admitted to our emergency department due to severe abdominal pain, malaise, and tenderness of the abdominal wall, which commenced abruptly several hours prior. An emergency CT scan revealed a large pseudoaneurysm of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, which was found with moderate atherosclerosis and no evidence of other dilated or aneurysmal segments. The patient underwent successful endovascular treatment and was discharged four days later without complications. Follow-up examination after two months demonstrated a patent graft and reduction of the aneurysmal sac.

Systematic Review on Abdominal Penetrating Atherosclerotic Aortic Ulcers: Outcomes of Endovascular Repair

PURPOSE

To systematically review existing evidence on outcomes of endovascular repair of abdominal atherosclerotic penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Cochrane Central Registry of Registered Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol (PRISMA-P 2020). The protocol was registered in the international registry of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42022313404). Studies reporting on technical and clinical outcomes of endovascular PAU repair in 3 or more patients were included. Random effects modeling was used to estimate pooled technical success, survival, reinterventions, and type 1 and type 3 endoleaks. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Pooled results are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality was assessed using an adapted version of the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies including 165 patients with a mean/median age ranging from 64 to 78 years receiving endovascular therapy for PAU between 1997 and 2020 were identified. Pooled technical success was 99.0% (CI: 96.0%-100%). In all, 30-day mortality was 1.0% (CI: 0%-6.0%) with an in-hospital mortality of 1.0% (CI: 0.0%-13.0%). There were no reinterventions, type 1, or type 3 endoleaks at 30 days. Median/mean follow-up ranged from 1 to 33 months. Overall, there were 16 deaths (9.7%), 5 reinterventions (3.3%), 3 type 1 (1.8%), and 1 type 3 endoleak (0.6%) during follow-up. The quality of studies was rated low according to the Modified Coleman score at 43.4 (+/- 8.5) of 85 points.

CONCLUSION

There is low-level evidence on outcomes of endovascular PAU repair. While in the short-term endovascular repair of abdominal PAU seems safe and effective, mid-term and long-term data are lacking. Recommendations with regard to treatment indications and techniques in asymptomatic PAU should be made cautiously.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This systematic review demonstrated that evidence on outcomes of endovascular abdominal PAU repair is limited. While in the short-term endovascular repair of abdominal PAU seems safe and effective, mid-term and long-term data are lacking. In the context of a benign prognosis of asymptomatic PAU and lacking standardization in current reporting, recommendations with regard to treatment indications and techniques in asymptomatic PAUs should be made cautiously.

Midterm results of complicated penetrating abdominal aortic ulcer treated by aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization

BACKGROUND

Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) is determined by atherosclerotic degeneration of the tunica media with disruption of the intima. Usually it is detected in the thoracic aorta, with few series describing an abdominal location. The aim of the study was to report early and late outcomes of the endovascular repair of complicated infrarenal abdominal PAU (a-PAU) by aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization.

METHODS

Data from all complicated a-PAU submitted to endovascular repair by aortobi-iliac endograft (Cook-Zenith Alpha) between 2016 and 2021 (February) were analyzed. The a-PAU coil embolization was performed to decrease the risk of persistent type II endoleak whenever possible. Complicated a-PAU were defined according with the presence of symptoms, aortic rupture, or saccular or pseudo-aneurysm. Technical success, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and reinterventions were assessed as early outcomes. Survival, endoleaks, and freedom from reinterventions were evaluated during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 1153 endovascular aortic procedures, 45 cases (4%) of complicated a-PAU were identified. Fourteen cases (31%) were managed in urgent setting (symptoms, n = 10 [22%]; shock, n = 4 [9%]). The median diameter of a-PAU was 49 mm (interquartile range, 14 mm). Thirteen patients (29%) had severe femoral or iliac access (angle >90°, circumferential calcification [>50%], hemodynamic iliac stenosis or obstruction, an external iliac artery diameter of less than 7 mm, or a previous femoral surgical graft). The a-PAU embolization was performed in 30 cases (67%). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Postoperative cardiac, pulmonary and renal morbidity occurred in one (2%), two (4%), and eight (18%) patients, respectively. Two patients (4%) required reintervention within 30 days for access related complications. The 30-day mortality was 2%. At a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range, 18 months), no type I or III endoleaks, iliac leg occlusion, or graft infection occurred and no patient required late reinterventions; the 36-month survival rate was 72%. No a-PAU enlarged or ruptured during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular repair of complicated a-PAU by a low-profile aortobi-iliac endograft and embolization is safe and effective. Excellent technical results are reported even in challenging anatomic features. Midterm clinical results are satisfactory in terms of aortic-related complications or mortality, freedom from reintervention, and survival.

Retrospective study of thoracic endovascular aortic repair as a first-line treatment for traumatic blunt thoracic aortic injury

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to confirm if thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was an appropriate therapeutic strategy for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI).

METHODS

Between 3/2005 and 12/2020, 104 patients with BTAI were brought to our hospital. The severity of each trauma case was evaluated using the Injury Severity Score (ISS); aortic injuries were classified as type I to IV according to Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. Initial treatment was categorized into four groups: nonoperative management (NOM), open aortic repair (OAR), TEVAR, or emergency room thoracotomy/cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ERT/CPR).

RESULTS

The patients' mean age and ISS were 56.7 ± 20.9 years and 48.3 ± 20.4, respectively. Type III or IV aortic injury were diagnosed in 82 patients. The breakdown of initial treatments was as follows: NOM for 28 patients, OAR for four, TEVAR for 47, and ERT/CPR for 25. The overall early mortality rate was 32.7%. Logistic regression analysis confirmed ISS > 50 and shock on admission as risk factors for early mortality. The cumulative survival rate of all patients was 61.2% at 5 years after treatment. After initial treatment, eight patients receiving TEVAR required OAR. The cumulative rate of freedom from reintervention using TEVAR at 5 years was higher in approved devices than in custom-made devices (96.0 vs. 56.3%, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Using TEVAR as an initial treatment for patients with BTAI is a reasonable approach. Patients with severe multiple traumas and shock on admission had poor early outcomes, and those treated with custom-made devices required significant rates of reintervention.

Chronic contained rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm that developed from chronic abdominal aortic dissection

A chronic contained rupture is an extremely rare subtype of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. We report the case of a 59-year-old man with a medical history of traumatic lumber fracture 7 years ago. He presented to us with an asymptomatic irregular abdominal aortic aneurysm, and surgery was performed 1 week after he was hospitalized. Based on the medical history, imaging, blood tests, and pathologic results, we determined that the chronic contained rupture progressed from a localized abdominal aortic dissection. This case illustrates the need to follow the morphology of aortic aneurysms if chronic abdominal aortic dissection is observed.

Intravascular Ultrasound-Assisted Endovascular Exclusion of Penetrating Aortic Ulcers

BACKGROUND

Penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) is an atherosclerotic lesion penetrating the elastic lamina and extending into the media of the aorta. It may evolve into intramural hematoma, focal dissection, pseudoaneurysm, and eventually rupture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a totally intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-assisted endovascular exclusion of PAU.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients (median age 66 years) underwent IVUS-assisted endovascular exclusion of PAU. The primary end points were fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and occurrence of type I primary endoleak. Secondary end points were postoperative mortality and morbidity, arterial access complications, postoperative length of stay in the hospital, and occurrence of type II endoleaks.

RESULTS

The median fluoroscopy time was 4 min (4-5). The median radiation dose was 4.2 mGy (3.9-4.5). A proximal and distal landing zone of at least 2 cm could be obtained in all the patients. No patient presented a type I endoleak. No postoperative mortality, no morbidity, or arterial access complication was observed. The median length of postoperative stay in the hospital was 2 days (2-3). The median length of follow-up was 25 months (9.2-38.7). One late type II endoleak was observed (7.7%), because of reflux from the intercostal arteries, without the need for additional treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

IVUS-assisted endovascular treatment of PAU allows durable exclusion of PAU with a short fluoroscopy time and no need for injection of contrast media. Further series are needed to confirm the results of this preliminary study.

Midterm Results of the Treatment of Penetrating Abdominal Aortic or Iliac Artery Ulcer with the BeGraft Balloon-Expandable Covered Stent-A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the novel BeGraft covered stent for the treatment of abdominal penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) or penetrating ulcers of the iliac arteries (PUIAs).

METHODS

This was a single-center observational study, which included 24 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular surgery due to abdominal PAU or PUIA between June 2017 and September 2019. Demographics of patients, lesion characteristics, diameter and length of the BeGraft stents, and postoperative events were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months with clinical and hemodynamic evaluation. Outcome measures included technical success, perioperative complications, and stent patency.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (13 men and 11 women), with a median age of 67 years (range, 42-81 years), were analyzed. Among them, 20 patients were symptomatic, and 4 patients underwent elective surgery because of the size of PAU. A total of 54 BeGraft stents (26 aortic and 28 peripheral) were successfully delivered and deployed to cover 13 aortic and 13 common iliac artery ulcer lesions. The technical success rate was 100%. The average procedural time was 53.8 ± 12.8 min. Complications included one case of the access-site pseudoaneurysm, which was successfully treated by thrombin injection. During a median follow-up of 20.5 months (range, 6-33 months), all stents remained patent, without endoleak or ulcer recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

BeGraft stents used during endovascular treatment of abdominal PAU and PUIA lesions are associated with favorable outcomes regarding technical success and patency. The primary use of BeGraft covered stents provides a valid option for patients with abdominal PAU. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm these promising results.

The Management of Penetrating Aortic Ulcer

Penetrating aortic ulceration (PAU) is part of the spectrum of acute aortic syndromes (AAS), and is defined as an ulcerated intimal disruption due to atherosclerotic disease. PAU may be simple, isolated and asymptomatic, or it may be symptomatic, aneurysmal and extensive; these may progress and lead to rupture. This review aims to evaluate the treatment options for PAU. Treatment options range from radiological surveillance, risk factor modification, best medical therapy and open or endovascular surgical repair. Patients with PAU are frequently older and comorbid with relatively damaged aortic tissue; this can make open surgical repair more challenging. Endovascular repairs for larger, symptomatic, aneurysmal PAU may be performed with acceptable outcomes. Complex endovascular repairs may be required depending on the pathology. Patients with small, asymptomatic, uncomplicated PAU may be safely followed up with surveillance. PAU with concomitant intramural haematoma (IMH) should be closely monitored to observe for resolution or progression following conservative and medical management strategies. PAU is a unique entity and its natural history should be studied independently to better understand appropriate management strategies. This research is currently lacking, and larger studies or registries may be helpful in optimising PAU management.

Multidetector Computed Tomography in Traumatic and Nontraumatic Aortic Emergencies: Emphasis on Acute Aortic Syndromes

Aortic emergencies comprise of a list of conditions which are uncommon but are potentially fatal. Prognosis is usually determined by emergent diagnosis and treatment and hence radiology plays a key role in patient management. In this article, we aim to review the various causes of aortic emergencies and the relevant imaging findings placing special emphasis on acute aortic syndromes.

Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers of the Abdominal Aorta: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAUs) of the aorta are defined as atherosclerotic lesions with aortic intima and media ulceration, which may lead to a complete rupture of the adventitial wall. The present article aimed to report an unusual case of a surgically treated patient with abdominal aorta PAU with an illustration of the key features and to review and analyze the existing literature data. PAUs typically develop in elderly and hypertensive patients and in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Although originally described for the descending thoracic aorta, a similar clinicopathological entity also occurs in the abdominal aorta. Patients with symptoms of a PAU should be treated immediately if they are fit for surgery. Exceptive observation by imaging modalities is necessary in patients with asymptomatic small (<2 cm) PAU, with or without focal dissection.

Spontaneous Rupture of Abdominal Aorta after Seizure in a 23-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report

Spontaneous non-aneurysmal aortic rupture is a rare and life threatening clinical entity. A 23-year-old female patient who visited a nearby hospital due to intractable seizure was transferred to our hospital with the impression of hypotension and decreased level of haemoglobin. She had a history of seizure attacks once a month. However, in the 2 weeks before presentation, the frequency of seizure attacks had increased to 2 to 3 times a day. An abdominal-pelvic computed tomogram scan showed extravasation of contrast from the abdominal aorta at L3 level. An emergency laparotomy revealed a 0.3 cm diameter tear in the posterior wall of the aorta, superior to the iliac bifurcation. We discuss the mechanism of spontaneous aortic rupture and the possibility of aortic rupture related to seizure attacks. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2014;21:103-106)

Multiple Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers of the Aorta: Report of a Case

A 69-year-old hypertensive man who had 7 pseudoaneurysms caused by penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers underwent 2-staged endovascular grafting in the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta and a conventional graft replacement of the abdominal aorta. He had an uneventful postoperative course; follow-up computed tomography demonstrated that all aneurysmal lesions treated by endovascular grafting completely disappeared. He has been free from any aortic events 20 months after the last surgery.

Double Tube Stent-Grafts for Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm: A New Concept

Purpose:

To present the concept of double tube stent-grafts and examine the indications for and results achieved with these devices.

Methods:

From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2005, 759 patients who underwent endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms at 2 centers. Of these, 45 (5.9%) patients received a double tube stent-graft; complete operative and follow-up data were available for retrospective analysis in 41 patients (33 men; mean age 73.1±8.9 years). Diameters measured before stent-graft implantation and at follow-up (12, 24, 36, and 48 months) with clinical examination, 2-phase computed tomographic angiography, duplex sonography, and biplanar abdominal radiography were tested for significant changes using ANOVA with the Bonferroni-Dunn correction. Late outcomes (clinical success and endoleak) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results:

The postoperative complication rate was 12.2%, with 2.4% systemic complications (1 patient with angina pectoris); the early mortality rate was 0%. Mean follow-up was 21.9±12.8 months (range 12–61) for the 41 patients. Four (9.8%) patients died during follow-up of cardiac causes (n=2), lung cancer (n=1), and bowel ischemia (n=1). Four (9.8%) endoleaks were observed during follow-up: 1 distal type I, 2 type II, and 1 type III. Maximum aneurysm diameters shrank from 52.0±9.5 mm preoperatively to 44.0±10.8 mm (p<0.0001) postoperatively at the latest available follow-up.

Conclusion:

Our study supports the use of this double tube technique for repair of appropriate saccular infrarenal aortic aneurysms. The double tube stent-graft method appears safe in terms of endoleaks and migration, so we recommend that it be considered an option of endovascular aortic aneurysm therapy.

Endovascular repair of infrarenal focal aortic pathology with limited aortic coverage

BACKGROUND

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for degenerative abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requires complete aortic exclusion to prevent ongoing aneurysmal degeneration in a diseased aorta. Focal infrarenal aortic pathology, such as penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), saccular aneurysm, and/or intramural hematoma (IMH) may not necessitate complete aortic coverage. Here, we review our experience with endovascular management of focal aortic pathology with limited aortic coverage.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database of patients undergoing EVAR was retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients treated with a nonbifurcated device (Current Procedural Terminology code: 34,800). Patients without a diagnosis of PAU, saccular aneurysm, IMH, or iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm were excluded. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed for confirmation of focal aortic pathology. Preoperative imaging and intraoperative details were reviewed. Outcome measures included technical success, symptom-free survival, and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

Eight patients were identified who underwent repair of a focal aortic defect with an endovascular tube graft from 2004-2011. Six patients underwent surgery for 7 saccular pseudoaneurysms and 2 patients had iatrogenic infrarenal pseudoaneurysms. Six saccular aneurysms were associated with PAU. Seven patients (88%) were men; the median age was 76 years (range: 50-85 years). Four patients (50%) had symptoms attributable to their aneurysm (2 abdominal pain, 1 gastrointestinal symptoms, 1 lower extremity emboli). Aneurysm repair was classified as urgent in 2 patients (25%). Six patients (75%) required placement of a single aortic component, the other 2 patients (25%) required 2 components. All devices used were Zenith (Cook, Inc., Bloomington, IN) ancillary components. The median device diameter was 22 mm (range: 18-28 mm), while the median device length was 56.5 mm (range: 39-80 mm). The technical success rate was 100%. There were no early graft-related complications. All symptomatic patients experienced improvement or resolution of symptoms. In all cases, radiologic follow-up at 1 month showed stable or decreasing aneurysm size. No endoleaks were detected and no patients have required reintervention to date.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal management of many focal infrarenal aortic defects, particularly those that are incidentally discovered, remains unclear. Our experience with endovascular repair of focal aortic pathology with limited aortic coverage suggests this approach is technically feasible and associated with excellent early results.

Endovascular therapy for penetrating ulcers of the infrarenal aorta

BACKGROUND

We sought to investigate the short- and mid-term results of the endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal penetrating aortic ulcers (aPAUs).

METHODS

Patients with infrarenal aPAUs treated by endovascular means between March 2004 and June 2012 were recruited. Pre-interventional imaging included computed tomography (CT) or CT angiography. Endoprostheses were chosen and deployed according to standard elective endovascular aneurysm repair anatomical requirements. Endpoints included 30-day survival, in-hospital mortality, 1-year PAU-related mortality, 1-year all-cause mortality, freedom from death and freedom from cumulative complication and interventions. Statistically, the Kaplan-Meier method was applied.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (18 men, median age 70 years (interquartile range, IQR = 59-75)) suffering aPAUs (n = 29, infrarenal = 25) were detected. The median co-morbid severity scoring was 1.0 (IQR = 0.4-1.4). The median follow-up period was 33 months (IQR = 8-51.5). Furthermore, 94.7% of patients had hypertension. Fourteen patients (73.7%) had symptoms, including four of them admitted with shock from large-contained PAU rupture. Endoluminal stent grafting was successfully delivered in all patients. In-hospital mortality was 10.5%. Two patients required secondary interventions (10.5%). The 30-day survival, 1-year PAU-related mortality and 1-year all-cause mortality were 94.7%, 89.5% and 89.5%, respectively. Freedom from death and freedom from cumulative complications and interventions was 86.4% and 86.4%, 78.9% and 78.9%, and 67.9% and 71.2% at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent and elective endovascular repair of aPAUs can be achieved with high technical success. The significant co-morbid status of the treated patients is illustrated in the considerable in-hospital mortality and underlines the advantage of such treatment over open surgical repair.

Endovascular abdominal aortic stent grafting in unrecognized Salmonella aortitis

Abdominal endovascular graft infection is a rare but life-threatening complication of endovascular repair that can be challenging to manage. This report delineates the progression of a unique set of events leading to Salmonella graft infection and investigates current treatment options.

Abdominal aortic disease caused by penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers

OBJECTIVE

Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) of the aorta is defined as an atherosclerotic lesion with ulceration of the aortic intima and media and rupture of the internal elastic lamina. PAU induced aortic dissection, aortic rupture, and secular aortic aneurysm and typically occurs in elderly hypertensive patients with severe atherosclerosis. Although it has been reported that atherosclerosis similarly occurs in the abdominal aorta, its natural history and treatment are still unclear. This study investigated the clinical features, natural history, and treatment of PAU of the abdominal aorta.

METHOD

Between April 2006 and March 2009, 4 diagnoses of PAU in the abdominal aorta were made by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These 4 cases were analyzed along with 61 previously reported cases from the literature with diagnoses of PAU in the abdominal aorta, aortic rupture, and isolated abdominal aortic dissection over the past 15 years, giving a total of 65 cases.

RESULTS

The patients were men with an average age of 63.5 years. All 4 had hypertension, and 2 had concomitant coronary artery disease. Two patients were asymptomatic, and the other 2 were symptomatic and transmural rupture had occurred. All diagnoses were made by CT and MRI. All 4 patients underwent open surgery with a knitted Dacron graft, with no postoperative deaths. In the literature, 53% of cases were symptomatic, including pain (40%, n = 26), shock (4.6%, n = 3), and lower limb embolism (9.2%, n = 6). The remaining 40% of cases were asymptomatic (n = 26). Six patients were treated medically, while 58 patients underwent surgery, with 2 postoperative deaths.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that surgical treatment (open surgery or endovascular stent grafting) should be performed to prevent an aortic catastrophe such as intramural hematoma, dissection, or rupture. (English translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2010; 19: 723-730.).

Penetrating abdominal aortic ulcers: case reports and review of the literature

Atherosclerotic abdominal aortic ulcers are uncommon in contrast to those of the thoracic aorta. They present with a variety of symptoms. Computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the methods of diagnosis. Treatment is made easier with the use of endovascular techniques, which have less mortality and morbidity than open repair. In this paper, we present three cases of penetrating aortic ulcers presenting with abdominal pain. In two of those cases, the diagnosis was made by MRI and missed by CT scan. We present a review of the literature.

Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the abdominal aorta involving the celiac trunk origin and superior mesenteric artery occlusion: endovascular treatment

We describe a case of endovascular treatment in a 64-year-old woman affected by a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) of the abdominal aorta with a 26-mm pseudoaneurysm involving the celiac trunk (CT) origin and with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion in the first 30 mm. The patient underwent stenting to treat the SMA occlusion and subsequent deployment of a custom-designed fenestrated endovascular stent-graft to treat the PAU involving the CT origin. Follow-up at 6 months after device placement demonstrated no complications, and there was complete thrombosis of the PAU and patency of the two branch vessels.

Tube Stent-Grafts for Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm: A Matched-Paired Analysis Based on EUROSTAR Data

OBJECTIVE

Tube stent-grafts for treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a nearly forgotten concept. For focal aortic pathologies tube stent-grafts may be a treatment option. We have performed a retrospective matched-paired analysis of the EUROSTAR registry regarding the outcome of tube vs. bifurcated stent-grafts for AAA. Tapered aortomonoiliac stent-grafts were not the objective of this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 1997 to June 2006, 7581 patients who underwent an endovascular AAA repair were entered in the EUROSTAR registry by 164 centers. One hundred fifty-three patients were treated with tube stent-grafts. For each of these 153 patients we selected one patient from a bifurcated stent-graft group (BGG-original, 7428 patients) matched according to gender, ASA, age, AAA diameter, and type of anesthesia. Differences in preoperative details between the two study groups were analyzed using chi-square test for discrete variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on early complications. Midterm outcomes (>30 days) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The duration of the procedure was shorter in the tube stent-graft group (TGG; 102.3 +/- 52.2) than in BGG (128.3 +/- 55.0; p = 0.0002). Type II endoleak was less frequent in TGG (4.0%; mean follow-up, 23.12 +/- 23.9 months) than in BGG (14.3%; mean follow-up, 20.77 +/- 20.0 months; p = 0.0394). Type I endoleaks and migration were distributed equally, without significant differences between the groups. Combined 30-day and late mortality was higher for TGG (p = 0.0346) and was obviously not aneurysm related.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that after selection of patients, tube stent-grafts for infrarenal aortic repair can be performed with great safety regarding endoleaks and migration. The combined higher 30-day mortality and non-aneurysm-related mortality during follow-up were mainly caused by cardiac failures in our sample.

Spontaneous perforation of a nonaneurysmal infrarenal aorta

Spontaneous perforation of a nonaneurysmal abdominal aorta due to a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU) is exceedingly rare. We describe the case of a 57-year-old man with a perforating PAU of the infrarenal aortic wall and discuss the clinical presentation, diagnostic pathways, and therapeutic options based on a comprehensive review of the literature. Since a PAU of the aorta can give rise to chronic mild to moderate abdominal or back pain, a computed tomographic scan of the abdomen should be performed in patients with evidence of vascular disease and persistent abdominal or back discomfort. Surgical resection or stent-graft placement is indicated in symptomatic patients or in asymptomatic patients with radiographic signs of progressive PAU.

Successful endovascular treatment of infrarenal aortic rupture after chemotherapy of a mesenchymal periaortic tumor

PURPOSE

To report the first successful endovascular repair of a non-aneurysmal aortic rupture due to periaortic tumour regression.

CASE REPORT

A 58-year-old man developed spontaneous infrarenal aortic rupture following chemotherapy which led to regression of a periaortic mesothelioma that had been diagnosed during explorative laparotomy 11 months earlier. Stent-graft placement was performed with intentional conversion of a bifurcated (Zenith, COOK) into an aorto-uni-iliac system. No complications were encountered during a 40 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular repair should be considered as a treatment option in non-aneurysmal aortic rupture.

Endovascular repair of an actively hemorrhaging gunshot injury to the abdominal aorta

Endovascular stents have had a limited role in the management of trauma and vascular emergencies involving active hemorrhage. We describe a patient with delayed rupture of the infrarenal aorta after intra-abdominal sepsis caused the breakdown of a primary aortic repair. A stent-graft repair was performed, as concomitant injuries did not allow anterior access to the aorta. This report describes the successful endovascular repair of an actively hemorrhaging penetrating abdominal aortic injury. Endovascular approaches to aortic injuries may be valuable in settings where a hostile abdomen precludes traditional open repair.

Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers of the Infrarenal Aorta: Life-threatening Lesions

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the incidence, clinical features, natural history, and treatment of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU) of the abdominal aorta.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2000 to June 2003, an abdominal PAU was diagnosed at our institution in eight patients (seven men, one woman; mean age 70 year). These eight cases were analyzed together with 38 additional cases found in a review of the literature (total 46 cases).

RESULTS

Occurring at an incidence of approximately 1%, abdominal PAU are less common than thoracic PAU. Seventy percent of cases are symptomatic: pain 52.5% (n =21), acute lower limb ischemia due to distal embolism 12.5% (n =5), shock 5% (n =2). Diagnosis is usually made by CT (66%) (n =26) that demonstrates a PAU in 35% (n =16) of cases, a subadventitial pseudoaneurysm in 28% (n =13), and rupture in 37% (n =17). An intramural hematoma (IMH) is observed in 9% (n =4) of cases. There were no cases of aortic dissection in this series. Calcifications of the abdominal aorta were frequent (56%) (n =26); while intra-aortic mural thrombus was found in 24% of cases (n =11), and 46% of patients (n =21) had an associated aneurysm. Twelve patients were treated medically while 34 underwent surgery (one postoperative death).

CONCLUSION

Review of the literature and this series suggests that PAU of the abdominal aorta is a life-threatening lesion, the main risk being rupture. Surgical management is recommended owing to its low morbidity and mortality.