Selective shunting with eversion carotid endarterectomy

Contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid stenosis: a comprehensive review

This study aims to provide an overview on contemporary open surgical approaches for the management of carotid artery stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify and categorize open surgery intervention techniques for the management of carotid artery stenosis, focusing on the benefits and drawbacks of each technique. Five surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) have been described: CEA with primary closure, CEA with patch closure, CEA by eversion technique, CEA by modified eversion technique and CEA by partial eversion. Evidence has reported significantly higher rates of perioperative complications after CEA with primary closure, including 30-days stroke rate and late restenosis. Although more recent techniques have been reported to provide superior outcomes, electing the best surgical technique is still a matter of debate. Also, CEA using a mini-skin incision has been associated to lower risk of cranial/cervical nerve injury and shorter length of hospital stay. The selection of the surgical intervention should be tailored and have into consideration individual patient characteristics, clinical considerations, surgeon preference and surgical team expertise. Further large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to support more robust decisions on the choice of contemporary open surgical approaches to manage carotid stenosis.

Routine versus selective near-infrared spectroscopy-guided shunting during carotid eversion endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of routine shunting to near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-guided shunting in patients undergoing eversion endarterectomy (EEA) under general anaesthesia.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data of all patients undergoing EEA of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in our department from January 2011 until January 2019. Included were patients with EEA of the ICA and the patients were divided into 2 groups: selective-shunting group and routine-shunting group. Patients (i) with patch angioplasty during the surgery, (ii) undergoing surgery for restenosis and (ii) stenosis after radiation therapy, (iii) without recorded regional cerebral oxygen saturation trends, (iv) presenting with an emergency treatment indication and (v) operated upon by residents were excluded. In all patients, EEA was performed in general anaesthesia and under NIRS monitoring. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to compare EEA outcomes after routine shunting to NIRS-guided shunting. Primary end points were defined as perioperative stroke and in-hospital mortality after EEA.

RESULTS

Routine and NIRS-guided selective shunting were applied in 340 (34.0%) and 661 (66.0%) patients, respectively. A total of 277 pairs were generated via propensity score matching. Fifty-eight (20.1%) from the selective-shunting group were intraoperatively shunted. Concomitant procedures were more frequently performed in the routine-shunting group [170 (61.4%) vs 47 (17.0%), 180 (65%) vs 101 (36.5%), and 60 (21.7%) vs 6 (2.2%), P < 0.001]. The perioperative stroke rate in the routine-shunting group was higher as well [11 (4.0%) vs 3 (1.1%), P = 0.022]. In-hospital death was overall 0.2% (n = 1). Multivariable logistic regression in the matched patient indicated age (odds ratio 1.050, 95% confidence interval 1.002-1.104, P = 0.046) and routine shunting (odds ratio 2.788, confidence interval 1.119-7.428, P = 0.032) as risk factors for perioperative stroke during EEA of the ICA.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that, during EEA of the ICA, under general anaesthesia, NIRS-guided selective shunting was associated with a lower incidence of perioperative stroke than routine shunting.

Unplanned Shunting Is Associated with Higher Stroke Risk after Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Shunting during eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA) may be technically challenging. Whether shunting practice patterns modify perioperative stroke risk after eCEA is unclear. We aimed to compare eCEA outcomes based on shunting practice.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2019) was queried for eCEAs performed for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared outcomes based on whether shunting was routine practice, preoperatively-indicated, intraoperatively-indicated, or not performed.

RESULTS

There were 13,207 eCEAs identified. Average age was 71.4 years and 59.4% of patients were male sex. Ipsilateral carotid stenosis was >80% in 45.6% and there was severe contralateral carotid stenosis in 8.6%. Early ipsilateral symptoms within 14 days of eCEA were transient ischemic attack in 5.6% and stroke in 7%. The majority of cases were performed under general anesthesia (82.7%). Electroencephalogram monitoring and stump pressures were utilized in 30.9% and 14.7%, respectively. Shunting was routine (25.4%), preoperatively-indicated (1.9%), intraoperatively-indicated (4.7%), or not implemented (68%). Preoperatively-indicated shunting was more often performed in patients with early symptomatic carotid stenosis or severe contralateral carotid stenosis. After routine shunting, preoperatively-indicated shunting, intraoperatively-indicated shunting, and no shunting, median operative duration was 110, 101, 112, and 97 min, respectively (P < 0.001), and ipsilateral perioperative stroke prevalence was 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.9%, and 0.7%, respectively (P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, longer operative time was associated with routine shunting (MR 1.17, 95% CI 1.15-1.19, P < 0.001), preoperatively-indicated shunting (MR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15, P < 0.001), and intraoperatively-indicated shunting (MR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.16, P < 0.001) compared with no shunting. Compared with no shunting, routine shunting (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.54-1.54, P = 0.74) and preoperatively-indicated shunting (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.47-4.99, P = 0.48) were not associated with stroke; however, intraoperatively-indicated shunting was associated with increased stroke (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.41-5.3, P = 0.003). Shunting type was not associated with perioperative mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperatively-indicated shunting during eCEA was associated with longest operative duration and increased perioperative stroke risk. Surgeon familiarity with shunting and planning to shunt in advance may permit more expeditious shunting and prevent stroke.

Shunt intention during carotid endarterectomy in the early symptomatic period and perioperative stroke risk

OBJECTIVE

Whether recent stroke mandates planned shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is controversial. Our goal was to determine associations of various shunting practices with postoperative outcomes of CEAs performed after acute stroke.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative database (2010-2018) was queried for CEAs performed within 14 days of an ipsilateral stroke. Surgeons who prospectively planned to shunt either shunted routinely per their usual practice or shunted selectively for preoperative indications. Surgeons who prospectively planned not to shunt either shunted selectively for intraoperative indications or did not shunt. Univariable and multivariable analyses compared shunting approaches.

RESULTS

There were 5683 CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke. Surgeons planned to shunt in 56.1% of cases. Patients whose surgeons planned to shunt vs planned not to shunt were more likely to have severe contralateral stenosis (8.8% vs 6.9%; P = .008), to receive general anesthesia (97.5% vs 89.1%; P < .001), and to undergo conventional CEA (94% vs 81.8%; P < .001). Unadjusted outcomes were similar between the cohorts for operative duration (124.3 ± 48.1 minutes vs 123.6 ± 47 minutes; P = .572) and 30-day stroke (3.4% vs 3%; P = .457), myocardial infarction (1.1% vs 0.8%; P = .16), and mortality (1.6% vs 1.3%; P = .28). On multivariable analysis, planning to shunt vs planning not to shunt was associated with similar risk of 30-day stroke (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.67; P = .402). On subgroup analysis, in 38.4% patients, no shunt was placed, whereas the remainder received routine shunts (44.4%), preoperatively indicated shunts (11.6%), and intraoperatively indicated shunts (5.5%). Compared with no shunting, shunting by surgeons who routinely shunt was associated with a similar stroke risk (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.91-2.13; P = .129), but shunting by surgeons who selectively shunt on the basis of preoperative indications (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.22-3.63; P = .007) or intraoperative indications (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.86-6.01; P < .001) was associated with increased stroke risk. Prior coronary revascularization independently predicted increased intraoperatively indicated shunting (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.05-1.8; P = .022).

CONCLUSIONS

In CEAs performed after acute ipsilateral stroke, there is no difference in postoperative stroke risk when surgeons prospectively plan to shunt or not to shunt. Shunting is often not necessary; however, when shunting is performed, routine shunters achieve better outcomes.

The perioperative outcomes of eversion carotid endarterectomy in diabetic patients aged 80 years or older

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists about the influence of advanced age and diabetes mellitus on the clinical effect of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study analyzed the perioperative (30-day) outcomes of CEA in diabetic patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

Data of 1872 consecutive patients who underwent 2125 primary eversion CEAs from 1990 to 2014 at our institution were prospectively stored in a vascular surgery registry. Risk factors, medication, and indication for surgery were recorded. The 354 patients (387 CEAs) aged ≥80 years formed the study base; of whom, 207 (219 CEAs) were diabetic and 147 (168 CEAs) were not. A neurologist assessed all patients preoperatively, on waking from the anesthesia, and before discharge from the hospital. All procedures were eversion CEA performed by the same surgeon under general anesthesia with routine electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting.

RESULTS

Diabetic patients were more likely to have arterial hypertension (P = .033), cardiac disease (P = .038), peripheral aneurysmal/atherosclerotic disease (P = .046), and contralateral carotid occlusion (P = .042) than their nondiabetic counterparts. Overall, there were no deaths, two (0.51%) perioperative strokes (both in diabetic patients), and 13 nonfatal cardiac complications (3.3%), of which 10 occurred in diabetic patients, but the difference failed to reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study show that CEA is safe and effective for stroke prevention in diabetic patients aged ≥80 years, with a negligible incidence of perioperative adverse events and no deaths.

Perioperative results eversion carotid endarterectomy in bilateral symptomatic stenosis

Introduction:

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a standard treatment for the prevention of stroke and death in patients with significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Eversion endarterectomy is warranted in patients with symptoms of cerebral ischemia and the degree of stenosis of 70-99%. The same is suitable for treating a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis with contralateral stenosis (50-70%).

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative complications (ICV, TIA, MI, mortality) in patients treated with carotid eversion endarterectomy with unilateral and bilateral symptomatic stenosis (with bilateral stenosis treated with ACI stenosis ≥70%).

Patients and Methods:

The study included 139 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis at the Department of Vascular Surgery of the University Clinical Center of Sarajevo in the period from January 2012 to December 2014 year. Given the involvement of ACI stenosis patients were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of 74 patients with bilateral stenosis (surgically treated with ACI stenosis ≥70%, while the degree of stenosis opposite ACI was from 50-70%), and group B of 65 patients with unilateral stenosis ≥70%.

Results:

Of the 139 patients included in the study, in the group A was 74, of which 46 male (62.2%) and 28 female (37.8%), while in group B were 42 male (64.6%) and 23 female (35.4%) (p = 0.90). The subjects in group A were slightly older 65.9 (± 7.8) compared to group B 64.2 (± 7.7) (p = 0.17). Analysis of risk factors indicating a higher number in Group A compared to group B, but the difference was not statistically significant: 34 smokers (45.9%) versus 36 (55.4%); p = 0:34), patients with hypertension (63 (85.1%) against the 52 (80.0%); p = 0.56), with statin therapy (62 (83.8%) versus 52 (80.0%); p = 0.72), diabetes (18 (24.3%) versus 18 (27.7%); p = 0.79) and with a heart disease (18 (24.3%) versus 7 (10.8%); p = 0.06). Analysis of the frequency of perioperative complications between the groups was not statistically significant: ICV (2/74 versus 3/65; p = 1.00), TIA (2/74 versus 3/65; p = 0.88), one death was recorded in group A, while myocardial infarction (MI) we had in either group.

Conclusion:

In this study, no statistically about significant differences in the number of perioperative complications (from 0 to 30 days) between the two groups. With this risk is acceptable to perform carotid endarterectomy in a patient in the opposite ACI stenosis of 50-70%.

Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the gold standard for treating carotid disease in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, though carotid angioplasty and stenting has emerged as a safe alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the durability of CEA in a large series of patients followed up according to a strict clinical and ultrasonographic protocol.

METHODS

Over a 23-year period (1990-2012) a total of 1773 patients (1251 men and 522 women) with a mean age of 75.2 years (range, 31 to 96 years) who underwent 2007 consecutive primary eversion CEAs performed by the same surgeon under general anesthesia with electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting were prospectively followed up with ultrasonography at 1, 6, and 12 months, then yearly. A long-term follow-up (median, 11.2 years; mean, 12.9 years) was obtained for 1680 patients (94.8%). End points were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death and late carotid restenosis/occlusion rates.

RESULTS

More than two in three of the lesions (1446 of 2007, 72.1%) were symptomatic at the time of surgery, with a 25% rate of preoperative stroke. Preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy was used by 1675 patients (94.4%), whereas 918 (51.8%) were receiving statin treatment. Overall, there were eight (0.4%) perioperative strokes and no deaths. During the follow-up, there were nine (0.47%) asymptomatic late carotid restenoses (six moderate [50%-69%] and three severe [≥ 70%]) and one (0.05%) carotid occlusion. Nine patients (0.47%) had late ipsilateral strokes, none of them related to restenosis/occlusion. Overall, there were 159 late deaths (9.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that eversion CEA can be performed in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with an extremely low perioperative stroke/death risk and a negligible incidence of late restenosis/occlusion, thus assuring a persistently good protection against the risk of cerebral ischemia.

Contralateral carotid artery occlusion is not a contraindication to carotid endarterectomy even if shunts are not routinely used

OBJECTIVE

Although controversial, carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been proposed as being safer than carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with a contralateral internal carotid occlusion (CCO). Arguably, with a CCO, CAS should be even safer than CEA if a shunt is not used. Accordingly, we reviewed our experience with 2183 CEAs performed routinely without a shunt to evaluate the risk of CEA performed in a subset of 147 patients with a CCO.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2011, 147 CEAs (111 men [75%], 36 women [25%]) were routinely performed without a shunt despite CCO. Of these patients, 76% were asymptomatic. CEAs were performed by seven surgeons using standard techniques (not eversion), with patients under general anesthesia and blood pressure maintained at >130 mm Hg. All patients received heparin (7500 U), and protamine reversal was routine. Median cross-clamp time was 20 minutes (range, 14-40 minutes).

RESULTS

Three neurologic events occurred ≤ 30 days (2.0%). One transient ischemic attack (TIA) occurred immediately, and one occurred on the first postoperative day due to occlusion of the endarterectomy site. One patient sustained an immediate stroke and died of a large computed tomography-documented atheroembolic shower.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate the safety of CEA in the presence of a CCO, even when performed without a shunt. It is unlikely that the stroke or delayed TIA could be attributed to nonshunting or CCO. Even if so, the stroke and death rates would be lower than those previously reported for patients undergoing CEA in the presence of a CCO. This may be due to short cross-clamp times, careful technique, general anesthesia, and blood pressure support. Given these low adverse event rates, our experience refutes the assumption that patients with a CCO are at such a high risk for CEA that the only alternative is CAS.

Predictors of neck bleeding after eversion carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify predictors for neck bleeding after eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA).

METHODS

A prospectively compiled computerized database of all primary eCEAs performed at a tertiary referral center between September 1998 and December 2009 was analyzed. The end point was any neck bleeding after eCEA. End point predictors were identified by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1458 eCEAs performed by the same surgeon on 1294 patients under general anesthesia with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring and selective shunting, there were five major and three minor perioperative strokes (0.5%), and no deaths. Neck bleeding after eCEA occurred in 120 cases (8.2%), of which 69 (4.7%) needed re-exploration. Univariate analysis (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) identified preoperative antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel (1.77 [1.20-2.62], P = .004), particularly when continued to the day before CEA (3.84 [2.01-7.33], P < .001), and postoperative hypertension (9.44 [6.34-14.06], P < .001) as risk factors for neck bleeding in general and for neck bleeding requiring re-exploration (4.50 [1.85-10.89], P = .001; 15.27 [2.08-104.43], P = .006, and 2.44 [1.12-5.30], P = .02, respectively). An increased risk of neck bleeding in general was associated with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (12.00 [2.59-56.78], P = .005), acetylsalicylic acid alone (4.37 [1.99-9.57], P < .001), and ticlopidine (2.49 [1.10-5.63], P = .02) only when they were continued to the day before CEA. No neck bleeding was associated with preoperative treatment with dipyridamole or warfarin, or no medication. No further complications occurred in the patients who underwent re-exploration.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this single-center university hospital study show that neck bleeding after CEA is relatively common but is not associated with an increased risk of stroke or death. Preoperative treatment with clopidogrel, particularly when it is continued to the day before surgery, and postoperative arterial hypertension seem to be associated with a higher risk of neck bleeding after CEA, requiring re-exploration in most cases. Other antiplatelet agents appear to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative neck bleeding only if they are continued to the day before CEA. Larger studies are warranted to confirm our findings and prevent this feared surgical complication.

Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion

PURPOSE

This study investigated the association between surgeon practice pattern in shunt placement and 30-day stroke/death in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO).

METHODS

Among 6379 CEAs performed in the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) between 2002 and 2009, we identified 353 patients who underwent CEA with CCO and compared the 30-day stroke/death rate with 5279 patients who underwent primary, isolated CEA with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Within patients with CCO, we examined the 30-day stroke/death rate across the reason for shunt placement and two distinct surgeon practice patterns in shunt placement: surgeons who selectively used a shunt (≤95% of CEAs) or routinely used a shunt (>95% of CEAs). We used observed/expected (O/E) ratios to provide risk-adjusted comparisons across groups.

RESULTS

Of 353 patients with CCO, 118 (33%) underwent CEA without a shunt, 173 (49%) underwent CEA using a shunt placed routinely, and 62 (18%) had a shunt placed for a neurologic indication. Rates of 30-day stroke/death across categories of reason for shunt use were no shunt, 3.4%; routine shunt, 4.0%; and shunt for indication, 4.8% (P = .891). The risk of 30-day stroke/death was higher for surgeons who selectively placed shunts (5.6%) in all their CEAs and lower for surgeons who routinely placed shunts (1.5%, P = .05). The risk of 30-day stroke/death was >1 in patients undergoing selective shunting (O/E ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.7) and <1 for surgeons who placed shunts routinely (O/E ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9). Stroke/death rates were lowest when individual surgeons' intraoperative decisions reflected their usual pattern of practice: 1.5% stroke/death rate when "routine" surgeons placed a shunt, 3.4% when "selective" surgeons did not place a shunt, and 7.6% stroke/death rate for "selective" surgeons who placed a shunt (P = .05 for trend).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of 30-day stroke/death is higher in CEA in patients with CCO than with a patent contralateral carotid artery. Surgeons who place shunts selectively during CEA have higher rates of stroke/death in patients with CCO. This suggests that shunt use for CCO during CEA is associated with fewer complications, but only if the surgeon uses a shunt as part of his or her routine practice in CEA. Surgeons should preoperatively consider their own practice pattern in shunt use when faced with a patient who may require shunt placement.

Diabetes and asymptomatic carotid stenosis: does diabetic disease influence the outcome of carotid endarterectomy? A 10-year single center experience

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused directly on carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic and asymptomatic diabetic patients, reporting controversial outcome. We compared perioperative (30-day) and late outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients undergoing CEA for severe asymptomatic carotid disease.

METHODS

Over 10 years, data were prospectively collected for diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic severe carotid disease. All procedures were eversion CEA. All patients underwent concomitant neurologic follow-up and a duplex ultrasound scan at 1, 6, and 12 months, then yearly, after operation.

RESULTS

Of 391 CEAs performed on 374 patients, 112 (28.7%) were in diabetic patients. There were no perioperative deaths or strokes in either diabetic patients or nondiabetic patients. A significantly higher incidence of cardiac complications occurred in diabetic patients (P < .01). A complete follow-up (mean, 6.1 years) was obtained for 348 patients. No recurrent stenoses or late occlusions were diagnosed in diabetic or nondiabetic patients. At 10 years, the risk of death was up to 4.6 times higher in diabetic patients, with a significant prevalence of cardiac-related deaths (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

CEA can be performed with no perioperative stroke risk or mortality, for asymptomatic disease in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. The absence of fatal strokes associated with a significantly higher risk of cardiac-related death in the long-term points to the need to improve prevention strategies for postoperative cardiac risk in diabetic patients.

Long-term survival and stroke-free survival after eversion carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis

BACKGROUND

Level 1 evidence supports carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the standard treatment for severe (>70% lumen reduction) carotid stenosis in asymptomatic patients, though its safety and efficacy in high-risk patients remain controversial. Long-term survival and stroke-free survival after CEA may guide decisions concerning this procedure for asymptomatic patients, but this outcome has only been considered in few reports outside the large randomized trial setting. This study analyzed long-term survival and stroke-free survival after CEA and the impact of risk factors in a consecutive series of asymptomatic patients, including those with medical comorbidities and particular anatomical features believed to increase the perioperative morbidity and mortality of CEA.

METHODS

For over 10 years, data were prospectively collected for all patients who underwent CEA for asymptomatic severe carotid disease at our institution. All CEAs performed by the same surgeon involved eversion technique, with patients under deep general anesthesia and continuous perioperative electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring for selective shunting. All patients had neurological follow-up and duplex ultrasound at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. A complete follow-up (mean, 6.1 years; range, 0.1 to 10.6 years) was obtained in 348 patients (93%) with an overall 365 CEAs (93%). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier life tables.

RESULTS

Among 374 patients undergoing 391 CEAs, there were no perioperative deaths or strokes. There were 17 (4.8%) late deaths, mainly cardiac-related (70%), and 2 (0.5%) non-fatal strokes. At 5 and 10 years, survival was 96.3% and 85.7%, and stroke-free survival was 95.6% and 84.8%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (P = .002) and cardiac disease (P = .005) were independent predictors of a shorter long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Eversion CEA proved safe and effective in a series of patients with asymptomatic severe carotid disease representing the typical population of daily clinical practice. Although long-term results were extremely favorable, excellent stroke-free survival was not translated into a longer patient survival.

Restenosis after eversion vs patch closure carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), previously reported to occur in 1%/year after operation, is the finite limitation of CEA. Eversion endarterectomy has a perceived lower incidence of recurrent stenosis, although data to support this contention are conflicting. The goal of the present study was to compare the late anatomic results of patch closure (PC) vs eversion CEA.

METHODS

Between January 1, 1995 and June 30, 2005, 950 CEA were performed by the senior author with adoption of eversion (EV) as the primary technique as of January 1, 2001. With minimum of 1-year follow-up by study inclusion criteria, complete follow-up data (including a duplex scan) was available for 155 PC and 135 EV patients. Incidence of moderate (50% to 70%) and severe (>70%) restenosis was examined at < or =2 months and >1 year after operation. Study end-points included late stroke, survival, and freedom from restenosis (moderate and severe) and were assessed by actuarial methods.

RESULTS

There were no differences in relevant demographic/clinical parameters, indication for surgery (69% overall asymptomatic) or early perioperative stroke/death (1.1% overall; P = .25) between PC and EV. After correction for different mean follow-up intervals (PC = 5.5 years vs EV = 3.5 years) by actuarial methods, there was no significant difference in late moderate (P = .91) or severe (P = .54) recurrent stenosis between PC and EV. In the group of patients with at least 1-year follow-up, 11/290 (3.8%) patients (4/135 EV, 7/155 PC; P = .39) required reintervention on their operated carotid artery at a cumulative follow-up interval of 4.5 years. Three strokes (3/290; 1.1%) occurred during late follow-up, all in the PC group, with only one related to the operated carotid artery. Late survival was similar between EV and PC, (P = .86). Female gender (odds ratio [OR] 3.72[1.02-13.5], P = .046) was associated with severe restenosis irrespective of surgical technique. Univariate analysis also showed that female gender (OR 7.6[CI: 0.88-66.7], P = .042) was associated with late stroke.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that restenosis rates are similar between eversion and patch CEA and likely represent biological remodeling phenomenon rather than technical variations of operations. While EV offers distinct advantages in certain anatomic circumstances, adoption of EV with the hope of decreasing restenosis is not warranted.

Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Contralateral Carotid Artery Occlusion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day outcome of carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion and compare it to that in patients with patent contralateral carotid artery. We compared 2,959 carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with patent contralateral internal carotid artery to 373 carotid endarterectomies performed in patients with occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery in the same institute between 1988 and 2004. Patient demographics, surgical and anesthesiological strategy, perioperative neurological and cardiac events, and deaths were compared. The patients were grouped and analyzed according to the presence or absence of symptoms and to their gender. No significant difference was shown in perioperative cardiological and neurological events and deaths in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion versus patients without contralateral carotid occlusion. Females had significant more neurological events than males, in both the asymptomatic (P < 0.001) and symptomatic (P = 0.02) groups. Concomitant occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery was not associated with increased risk of perioperative cardiological or neurological adverse events. However, female gender was associated with higher risk for adverse neurological events.

Endarterectomia carotídea sob bloqueio loco-regional

OBJETIVO: Os autores objetivam descrever os resultados nas cirurgias de endarterectomia carotídea, utilizando-se anestesia loco-regional, emprego seletivo de shunt e proteção farmacológica intra-operatória. MÉTODO: Foram estudados doentes submetidos à endarterectomia carotídea sob bloqueio loco-regional, no Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), no período de março de 1996 a maio de 2004. Este estudo é composto de 119 endarterectomias (108 doentes), sendo 69 doentes (63,8%) do sexo masculino e 39 (36,2%) do sexo feminino. A idade média foi de 63 anos, variando entre 43 e 83 anos. A indicação da operação foi estenose sintomática em 60 doentes (55,5%) e assintomática em 48 (44,5%). Foi realizada avaliação, por imagem, pelo eco-Doppler colorido e arteriografia. RESULTADOS: Foram excluídos do trabalho cinco doentes nos quais foi necessária a conversão para a anestesia geral por intolerância à colocação do clampe carotídeo. Dos 103 doentes submetidos a 114 endarterectomias, utilizamos um shunt em quatro cirurgias (3,5%), em função da intolerância do paciente à colocação do clampe carotídeo durante o ato cirúrgico. Utilizou-se remendo em 19 (16,6%) cirurgias. A mortalidade no período pós-operatório imediato ocorreu em três doentes (2,6%), todos em decorrência de acidente vascular cerebral. Um doente (0,87%) apresentou acidente vascular isquêmico menor, e um (0,87%) doente apresentou síndrome de hiperperfusão, que evoluiu com acidente vascular cerebral hemorrágico. Esse doente foi submetido à drenagem do hematoma cerebral, com recuperação total do déficit neurológico. No pós-operatório tardio, houve reestenose ou oclusão em quatro doentes (5,3%). CONCLUSÃO: A endarterectomia carotídea pode ser realizada com segurança no doente em vigília, utilizando-se o shunt seletivamente, com a utilização de fármaco-proteção cerebral. O bom resultado obtido e a baixa morbimortalidade trazem um diferencial no tratamento da doença carotídea.

Initial experience with eversion carotid endarterectomy: Absence of a learning curve for the first 100 patients

OBJECTIVE

Eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been touted as superior to standard CEA with patch closure because of allegedly lower restenosis rates and greater technical ease of performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early experience of one vascular surgeon beginning to use this technique.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in an academic vascular surgical practice. The first 100 patients undergoing CEA via the eversion technique were compared with 100 contemporaneous patients who had standard CEA with patch closure. Residual (first examination within 3 months) or recurrent postoperative duplex scan stenosis, perioperative neurologic deficit, and mortality were analyzed by cumulative sum failure and Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis.

RESULTS

Operative indications were not significantly different between eversion and standard CEA patients (63% vs 60% asymptomatic, 10% vs 7% stroke, 4% vs 5% amaurosis, and 23% vs 28% transient ischemia). Intraoperative shunting was more commonly used during eversion CEA (87% vs 59%; P < .01). Perioperative neurologic deficits included amaurosis (n = 1) after eversion CEA and transient cerebral ischemia (n = 1) and retinal infarction (n = 1) after standard CEA, with one cardiac death each. By 36 months, one other patient in each group had experienced a transient ischemic event, but there were no strokes. Four carotids occluded within 36 months of eversion CEA, compared with one occlusion after standard CEA (not significant). Patients undergoing eversion CEA showed no difference in critical (>80%) residual or recurrent stenosis rates. However, after eversion CEA, a greater degree of greater than 50% recurrent stenosis was observed at 36 months (38% vs 6%; P < .001) despite similar residual stenosis rates. Cumulative sum failure analysis showed no plateau among patients undergoing eversion CEA, thus indicating the absence of a learning curve, at least within the first 100 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite enthusiasm by advocates for eversion CEA, the recurrent greater than 50% stenosis rate remained high for the first 100 patients who underwent this technique, with no evidence of a learning curve. This observation implies that vascular surgeons considering adoption of this technique should monitor their own early results carefully.

Increased oxygen administration during awake carotid surgery can reverse neurological deficit following carotid cross-clamping

We describe the management of two patients undergoing awake carotid surgery who developed signs of cerebral ischaemia following cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery. Administration of oxygen 100% with a close-fitting anaesthetic facemask reversed the neurological deficit, avoiding the need for insertion of an internal carotid artery shunt. Thus, the incidence of shunt insertion, which is reduced by the use of regional rather than general anaesthesia, could be reduced further by supplementary oxygenation. The possible mechanism and implications are discussed.

Durability of carotid endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic stenoses

PURPOSE

Although many studies have well established that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is beneficial in selected patients with severe carotid disease, only a few large studies have focused on the durability of the surgical procedure. Carotid artery angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has recently been proposed as a potential alternative to CEA. We analyzed the incidence of late occlusion and recurrent stenosis after CEA.

METHODS

Over 13 years 1000 patients underwent 1150 CEA procedures to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. CEA procedures involving either traditional CEA with patching (n = 302) or eversion CEA (n = 848) were all performed by the same surgeon, with patients under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical follow-up at 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. New neurologic events, late occlusions, and recurrent stenoses 50% or greater were recorded. Complete follow-up (mean, 6.2 years; range, 6-156 months) was obtained in 95% of patients (949 of 1000), for an overall average of 95% of procedures (1092 of 1150). Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier life table method.

RESULTS

Perioperative (30-day) mortality rate was 0.3% (3 of 1000), and stroke rate was 0.9% (11 of 1150), with a combined mortality and stroke rate of 1.2%. The incidence of late occlusion and recurrent stenosis 70% or greater was 0.6% and 0.5%, respectively, with a combined occlusion and restenosis rate of 1.1%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the rate of freedom from occlusion, restenosis 70% or greater, and combined occlusion and restenosis 70% or greater at 12 years was 99,4%, 99.5%, and 98.8%, respectively. Occlusion and restenosis developed asymptomatically.

CONCLUSIONS

CEA is a low-risk procedure for treating severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease, with excellent long-term durability. Proponents of CAS should bear this in mind before considering CAS as a routine alternative to CEA.

Octogenarians with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: a cohort at higher risk for carotid endarterectomy?

PURPOSE

Carotid angioplasty and stenting has been proposed as a treatment option for carotid occlusive disease in patients at high risk, including those 80 years of age or older or with contralateral carotid occlusion. We analyzed 30-day mortality and stroke risk rates of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients aged 80 years or older with concurrent carotid occlusive disease.

METHODS

From a retrospective review of 1000 patients undergoing 1150 CEA procedures to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid lesions over 13 years, we identified 54 patients (5.4%) aged 80 years or older with concurrent contralateral carotid occlusion. These patients were compared with 38 patients (3.8%) aged 80 years or older with normal or diseased patent contralateral carotid artery and 81 patients (8.1%) younger than 80 years with contralateral carotid occlusion. All CEA procedures involved either standard CEA with patching or eversion CEA, and were performed by the same surgeon, with the patients under deep general anesthesia and cerebral protection involving continuous perioperative electroencephalographic monitoring for selective shunting. Shunting criteria were based exclusively on electroencephalographic abnormalities consistent with cerebral ischemia.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality and stroke rate in patients aged 80 years or older with concurrent contralateral carotid occlusion was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

The concept of high-risk CEA needs to be revisited. Patients with two of the criteria considered high risk in the medical literature, that is, age 80 years or older and contralateral carotid occlusion, can undergo CEA with no greater risks or complications. Until prospective randomized trials designed to evaluate the role of carotid angioplasty and stenting have been completed, CEA should remain the standard treatment in such patients.