Iliac artery stenting in patients with poor distal runoff: Influence of concomitant infrainguinal arterial reconstruction

Concomitant Pedal Interventions Improve Outcomes for Tibial Interventions in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

BACKGROUND

Tibial interventions for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are now commonplace, and poor pedal runoff is associated with worse outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of pedal interventions to improve poor pedal runoff on the outcomes following tibial interventions.

METHODS

A database of patients undergoing tibial interventions for CLTI at a single center between 2010 and 2022 was retrospectively queried. Patients with critical ischemia (Rutherford 5 and 6) were identified. Preintervention and postintervention angiograms were reviewed in all cases to assess pedal runoff (total = 10), resulting in 2 run-off score groups as follows: good versus poor, <7 and ≥ 7, respectively. The presence or absence of a pedal intervention then segmented the poor runoff group. Outcomes of wound healing at 3 months, amputation-free survival (AFS; survival without major amputation) and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE; above ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention (new bypass graft and jump or interposition graft revision) were evaluated.

RESULTS

1,768 patients (63% male, age 67 ± 12 years, mean ± SD) with CLTI underwent isolated tibial intervention on a median of 2 tibial vessels. All patients had Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) grade 3 and 4 disease. Preoperatively, 40% of cases had good runoff (4.4 ± 1.1, mean ± SD), 38% had poor runoff and no pedal intervention (8.6 ± 0.8; P = 0.01 compared to good runoff), and 22% had poor runoff with a concomitant pedal intervention (8.7 ± 0.6; P = 0.01 compared to good runoff). Pedal intervention was performed on a median of 2 tarsal vessels with a technical success of 91% and overall improved pedal runoff (6.5 ± 2.1; P = 0.01 vs. preoperative). Patients with a successful concomitant pedal intervention had improved 30-day MALE rate (7% vs. 12%; P = 0.001) and 30-day amputation rate (5% vs. 11%; P = 0.001) compared to the poor runoff and no pedal intervention group and were comparable to the good runoff and no pedal intervention group (7% and 5%, respectively). Ulcer healing at 3 months was improved in the poor runoff group with intervention (55%) compared to the poor runoff and no pedal intervention group (25%; P = 0.001) but remained significantly below the good runoff group (73%). At 5 years in patients with poor runoff, pedal intervention improved freedom from MALE (41 ± 8% vs. 17 ± 8% mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); P = 0.008) and AFS (38 ± 6% vs. 11 ± 6%, mean ± SEM; P = 0.003) and these were equivalent to the good runoff group (46 ± 4% and 51 ± 5%, mean ± SEM; freedom from MALE and AFS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant pedal intervention to improve pedal runoff in patients with poor pedal runoff during a tibial intervention for CLTI results in improved short-term and long-term outcomes and should be considered for effective limb salvage.

Comparison of complete multi-level vs. iliac-only revascularization for concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease

Objective

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of complete multi-level vs. iliac-only revascularization for the treatment of concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease.

Methods

A total of 139 consecutive adult patients with severe stenosis and occlusive iliac and SFA disease with Rutherford categories 2-5 underwent multi-level (n = 71) and iliac-only (n = 68) revascularization at the Department of Intervention Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, and Aerospace Center Hospital, between March 2015 and June 2017. Improvement in Rutherford class, perioperative major adverse events, the length of stay, survival rate, and limb salvage rate were assessed. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio were compared between the two groups.

Results

At 48 months, improvement in the Rutherford category was observed in the two groups with no significant difference (P = 0.809). Additionally, the two groups were similar concerning the primary patency (84.0% vs. 79.1%, P = 0.717) and limb salvage rate (93.1% vs. 91.3%, P = 0.781). A higher proportion of the perioperative major adverse events (33.8% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.455), the all-cause mortality (11.3% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.632), and the average length of hospital stay [7.0 (6.0, 11.0) vs. 7.0 (5.0, 8.0), P = 0.037] were seen in the multi-level group compared with the iliac-only group.

Conclusion

For concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease, iliac-only revascularization has favorable efficacy and safety outcomes compared with complete multi-level revascularization in selected patients with patent profunda femoris artery and at least one healthy outflow tract of the infrapopliteal artery.

The Effect of Retrograde External Iliac Artery Runoff on Aortofemoral Bypass Limb Patency

BACKGROUND

Superficial femoral artery (SFA) and profunda patency has been shown to affect aortofemoral bypass (AFB) limb patency. However, the effect of retrograde flow through the external iliac artery (EIA) is unknown and is the subject of this analysis.

METHODS

Institutional AFB data from 2000-2017 were gathered, excluding those where SFA/EIA patency could not be determined. The cohort was divided into limbs with and without EIA occlusion; primary outcome was limb-based primary patency. Kaplan-Meier estimated patency; cox proportional-hazards model evaluated EIA patency while controlling for other factors.

RESULTS

Over the study period, there were AFB 557 limbs in 281 patients. Of the 435 AFB limbs in 220 patients that met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, 162 had EIA occlusion and 273 had a patent EIA. Mean age was 69.6±9.0. EIA occlusions were more common in male patients (59.9% vs 44.6%; p=0.001), patients with CAD (43.8% vs 34.1%; p=0.042), COPD (34.6% vs 20.5%; p=0.001), and CHF (14.8% vs 5.9%; p=0.002). Limbs with EIA occlusions more often underwent end-to-side proximal anastomosis (40.7% vs 24.2%; p<0.001) and simultaneous infrainguinal bypass (7.4% vs 0.7%; p<0.001). Median clinical follow-up was 4.4 years (IQR: 1.6-8.4). Five-year primary patency was 83.1% (95% CI: 74.5%-90.0%) for EIA occlusion limbs and 85.9% (95% CI: 80.2%-90.0%) with patent EIA limbs (p=0.96). While controlling for other factors, EIA stenosis or occlusion did not affect primary patency. For patients with a proximal occlusion (occluded aorta, occluded common iliac, or end-to-end proximal anastomosis) and occluded SFA (N=73), EIA occlusion had a HR of 1.92 for loss of patency, but this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

EIA patency did not influence primary patency in the overall cohort Further investigation on the topic in specific patient subgroups is warranted to determine the effect of EIA patency.

Society for Vascular Surgery femoral runoff score is associated with limb-based patency after aortofemoral bypass

OBJECTIVE

Despite advancements, aortofemoral bypass (AFB) remains the most durable option for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Although runoff has been shown to be associated with AFB patency, the association of the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) thigh runoff scoring system with patency has not been assessed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the SVS runoff scoring system and limb-based primary patency after AFB.

METHODS

Institutional data for patients undergoing AFB with preoperative runoff imaging available from 2000 to 2017 were queried. Runoff scores were assigned according to the presence of occlusive disease in the superficial femoral artery and profunda femoris artery (minimum, 1; maximum, 10) as described by the 1997 SVS reporting standards for lower extremity ischemia. Limb-based patency was the primary endpoint. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the long-term limb-based patency and freedom from reintervention between limbs with runoff scores ≥6 and those with runoff scores <6. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate the association between a runoff score of ≥6 and primary patency loss, controlling for other factors associated with primary patency.

RESULTS

In 161 patients, 316 limbs had undergone revascularization. The mean patient age was 66.7 ± 11.3 years, and 51.6% were women. Most limbs had undergone revascularization for claudication (56.5%). Most (89.4%) had TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus class D lesions, 27.3% had required suprarenal or higher clamping, and 11.2% had undergone concomitant mesenteric intervention. A femoral outflow adjunct and concurrent lower extremity bypass was required in 41.8% and 2.9% of limbs, respectively. Those with a runoff score of ≥6 had experienced greater rates of 30-day myocardial infarction (11% vs 1%; P = .005), respiratory failure (11% vs 1%; P = .005), and mortality (8% vs 0%; P ≤ .006). The median follow-up period was 4.0 years (interquartile range, 6.5 years). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year primary patency was 94.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.9%-97.3%), 89.2% (95% CI, 85.4%-93.2%), and 81.4% (95% CI, 76.0%-87.1%), respectively. The 5-year primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, and freedom from reintervention were 84.9% (95% CI, 79.7%-90.5%), 91.7% (95% CI, 87.3%-96.3%), and 83.3% (95% CI, 78.3%-88.7%), respectively. Patients with a runoff score of ≥6 had lower primary (log-rank P < .01), primary-assisted (P < .01), and secondary patency (P = .01). The factors associated with the loss of primary patency included a high runoff score (runoff score of ≥6: hazard ratio [HR], 4.1; 95% CI, 2.1-8.0; P < .01), simultaneous mesenteric endarterectomy (HR, 13.5; 95% CI, 1.9-97.8; P = .01), and chronic kidney disease (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.5-14.6; P = .01). Increasing age (HR, 0.94 per year; 95% CI, 0.91-0.97; P < .01) and hyperlipidemia (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.23-0.85; P = .01) were protective.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVS femoral runoff score is an important factor associated with long-term AFB limb patency. Scores of ≥6 portend for worse limb outcomes and a greater incidence of operative complications. The SVS score can be determined from preoperative axial imaging studies and serve as a guide in decision-making and operative planning.

Advances in the Management of Iliac Artery Occlusive Disease: A Short Review

There have been considerable advances in the management of patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. While endovascular procedure is the treatment of choice for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) type A and is more often used in TASC type B iliac lesions, recent studies report encouraging results in patients with intermittent claudication suffering from TASC type C and D iliac disease. Modern surgical techniques have been proposed for the treatment of high-risk subjects with critical limb ischemia due to advanced aortoiliac disease. Combined or hybrid interventions involving endovascular and open procedures performed either successively or intraoperatively are becoming more popular as vascular surgeons acquire endovascular skills. However, the long-term results of these therapies especially in the presence of multilevel occlusive lesions still remain uncertain.

Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease

BACKGROUND

In multilevel arterial disease, whether complete revascularization or staged runoff repair should be performed remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iliac inflow repair and to identify clinical conditions that are associated with the need for runoff repair in concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease.

METHODS

Patients undergoing inflow repair for complicated flow-limiting iliac lesions with diffuse SFA disease between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with poor response to inflow repair underwent infrainguinal revascularization (IIR).

RESULTS

The 29 ischemic limbs examined in this study represent 26 different patients (22 males; mean age, 77 ± 8 years). Indications for inflow repair were Rutherford Classifications III (31%), IV (31%), V (31%), and VI (7%). Severity of the complicated SFA disease was either TASC (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus) type C (14%) or type D (86%). Overall, freedom from IIR was 90% after 30 days and 83% after 1 year. Patients having claudication, rest pain, and shallow ischemic ulcers experienced the relief of symptoms, whereas patients with deep gangrene that needed minor amputation required IIR more frequently (p < 0.01). Anatomical risk factors for poor response to inflow repair were poor quality of the deep femoral artery (p < 0.01) and the flow-limiting popliteal artery (p = 0.02), and poor below-knee runoff (≤ 1 vessel, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Iliac inflow repair can reverse the symptoms in patients with multilevel arterial occlusive disease that are not associated with gangrenous toes.

Endovascular Treatment of Iliac Occlusive Disease: Review and Update

Use of endovascular interventions for arterial occlusive lesions continues to increase. With the evolution of the technology supporting these therapeutic measures, the results of these interventions continue to improve. In general, a comparison of techniques for revascularization of iliac occlusive diseases shows similar initial technical success rates for open versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Angioplasty is often associated with lower periprocedural morbidity and mortality rates. Conversely, surgery frequently provides greater long-term patency, although late failure of percutaneous therapies may occur but still can be treated successfully with reintervention. The perpetual buildup of experience with angioplasty and stenting will eventually characterize its role in the management of occlusive disease. This review outlines the current consensus and applicability of endovascular management of iliac occlusive diseases.

Long-term results of combined aortoiliac and infrainguinal arterial reconstruction for the treatment of critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate our long-term experience with combined iliac endovascular therapy (EVT) and infrainguinal bypass to treat critical limb ischemia (CLI) and compare outcomes to those of patients who underwent surgery for aortoiliac lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2000 to June 2013, 57 patients (58 limbs) underwent an infrainguinal bypass combined with aortoiliac reconstruction to treat CLI. Eighteen limbs were treated by bypass alone and 8 limbs were treated by bypass with EVT for aortoiliac lesions (Bypass group). Thirty-two limbs were subjected to EVT alone for iliac lesions (EVT group).

RESULTS

Preoperative limb ischemia was more severe in the EVT group. There were no significant differences in major procedure-related complications (χ(2) test, P = 0.853), systemic complications (P = 0.853), and mortality (P = 0.916) between the 2 groups. The limb salvage rates were 92% at 1, 3, and 5 years in the Bypass group and 93% at 1, 3, and 5 years in the EVT group, with no significant difference observed between the groups (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, P = 0.616).

CONCLUSION

Infrainguinal surgical reconstruction combined with an iliac EVT is an acceptable strategy for managing patients with CLI.

Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects about 27 million people in North America and Europe, accounting for up to 413,000 hospitalizations per year with 88,000 hospitalizations involving the lower extremities and 28,000 involving embolectomy or thrombectomy of lower limb arteries. Many patients are asymptomatic and, among symptomatic patients, atypical symptoms are more common than classic claudication. Peripheral arterial disease also correlates strongly with risk of major cardiovascular events, and patients with PAD have a high prevalence of coexistent coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Because the prevalence of PAD increases progressively with age, PAD is a growing clinical problem due to the increasingly aged population in the United States and other developed countries. Until recently, vascular surgical procedures were the only alternative to medical therapy in such patients. Today, endovascular practice, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting, is used far more frequently for all types of lower extremity occlusive lesions, reflecting the continuing advances in imaging techniques, angioplasty equipment, and endovascular expertise. The role of endovascular intervention in the treatment of limb-threatening ischemia is also expanding, and its promise of limb salvage and symptom relief with reduced morbidity and mortality makes percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting an attractive alternative to surgery and, as most endovascular interventions are performed on an outpatient basis, hospital costs are cut considerably. In this monograph we discuss current endovascular intervention for treatment of occlusive PAD, aneurysmal arterial disease, and venous occlusive disease.

Acute and long-term outcome of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac occlusive lesions stratified according to the TASC classification: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To compare acute and long-term outcomes of endovascular therapy for TASC (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus) A and B lesions versus TASC C and D lesions.

METHODS

Based on a prospectively maintained database, a retrospective analysis was conducted of 375 symptomatic patients (335 men; mean age 63+/-8 years) who underwent 438 interventions for aortoiliac arterial obstructions. Lesions were stratified according to the TASC II classification: 259 (59%) procedures involved TASC A/B lesions, while 113 (26%) were for TASC C and 66 (15%) for TASC D lesions.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of patients with TASC A/B lesions differed significantly in the ankle-brachial index (ABI), occurrence of renal insufficiency, and lesion characteristics from those with TASC C or D lesions. Acute treatment success, defined as residual stenosis <30%, was 100%, 96%, 93%, and 100% for TASC A, B, C, and D lesions, respectively. The primary 1-year patency rate, which was 86% for the entire study cohort, was similar for all TASC classifications (89%, 86%, 86%, 85% for TASC A to D lesions, respectively). In the TASC A/B cohort, the 5-year event-free survival (70%) was not significantly better than in the C/D cohort (57%, p=0.124). The clinical outcome, as measured by Rutherford stage and ABI, improved significantly in all TASC subgroups after successful intervention and was maintained up to 1 year. Stenting was an independent predictor for lower restenosis rates (HR 0.517, 95% CI 0.317 to 0.842; p=0.008).

CONCLUSION

In experienced hands, endovascular therapy of aortoiliac lesions can be successfully performed with sustained long-term outcome independent of the TASC II classification, even in class D lesions.

The Influence of the Ipsilateral Superficial Femoral Artery on Iliac Angioplasty

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the ipsilateral superficial femoral artery (SFA) on percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the iliac arteries. From 1993 to 2005, 183 iliac lesions (179 stenoses, 4 occlusions; 37 common, 35 external, and 111 both iliac arteries) in 127 patients with disabling claudication [94 (52%)], rest pain [43 (23%)], and ulcer/gangrene [46 (25%)] were treated by PTA. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) iliac lesion types were A in 48 limbs (26%), B in 92 (50%), C in 38 (21%), and D in 5 (3%). Stents were placed selectively for primary angioplasty failure [residual stenosis (>30%) or pressure gradient (>5 mm Hg)]. Seventy-seven limbs (42%) had patent SFAs (66 intact/<50% stenosis and 11 previously bypassed, pSFA group), 28 (15%) had stenotic SFAs (50-99%, sSFA group), 51 (28%) had occluded SFAs (oSFA group), and 27 (15%) had concomitant SFA angioplasty (aSFA group). The Society for Vascular Surgery and the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting standards were followed to define outcomes. There were no perioperative deaths. Total complication rate was 1.1% (2/183, groin hematomas). The mean follow-up was 20 months (range 1-115). One hundred twenty-five limbs (68%) had PTA alone for iliac lesions, and 58 (32%) had iliac stenting (a total of 91 stents). TASC iliac lesion types and the status of the ipsilateral profunda femoris artery were not significantly different among the four groups. Seventeen limbs (9%) had subsequent infrainguinal bypass: three in the pSFA, seven in the oSFA, four in the sSFA, and three in the aSFA groups (p = 0.19). The primary patency rate was significantly decreased in the sSFA group (29% at 3 years, Kaplan-Meier log-rank, p < 0.0001) compared with the other three groups; however, there were no significant differences among the pSFA, oSFA, and aSFA groups (67%, 67%, and 86% at 3 years, respectively; p = 0.92). The continued clinical improvement rates were significantly decreased in the sSFA group (36% at 3 years, p = 0.0043) compared with the other three groups; however, there was no significant difference between the pSFA, oSFA, and aSFA groups (81%, 84%, and 75% at 3 years, respectively; p = 0.088). The assisted primary and secondary patency and limb salvage rates were not significantly different among the four groups (p > 0.40). Stratified analysis in patients with TASC type B/type C, critical limb ischemia, or claudicants revealed similar results. The primary patency and continued clinical improvement were significantly decreased in patients with stenotic SFAs, suggesting that concomitant SFA angioplasty might improve iliac patency after iliac PTA for patients with stenotic SFAs. The presence of an occluded SFA did not adversely affect the outcomes of iliac PTA. During iliac PTA, a stenotic SFA should be considered for revascularization via endovascular means but an occluded SFA can be observed.

Shifting Wallgraft position: Case reports and review of the forces affecting Wallgraft positioning

Extensive use of stent-grafts in the iliac arteries is an increasingly common endovascular alternative to an aortobifemoral bypass procedure. The treatment of diffuse bilateral disease is frequently performed by using the technique of paired stent-grafts in the proximal common iliac arteries to effectively re-create the aortic-bifurcation. We present three patients treated with this technique who returned with recurrent occlusive disease. During subsequent treatment, the stent-grafts were noted to be in different positions from where they were initially deployed. A discussion of the possible explanations for the shifting positions follows.

Percutaneous Transluminal Revascularization for Iliac Occlusive Disease: Long-term Outcomes in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus A and B Lesions

Percutaneous transluminal intervention for atherosclerotic iliac occlusive disease is now commonplace. We examine the long-term outcomes of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A and B lesions. We performed a retrospective anonymous analysis of records from patients who underwent iliac artery angioplasty with or without stenting between January 1990 and June 1999. Indications for intervention were symptomatic claudication (77%) or critical ischemia (23%). Altogether, 276 patients (all men; average age 64 +/- 11 years range 32-87 years) underwent 394 interventions. Co-morbidities included hypertension (61%), hypercholesterolemia (45%), diabetes (28%), and chronic renal insufficiency (26%). A total of the 62% of the lesions were TASC category A, and the remainder were category B. Of the 394 primary interventions, 51% included placement of stents. Technical success (defined by < 30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 98% of treated vessels. The procedure-related mortality rate was 1.8% at 30 days and 4.7% at 90 days; the procedure-related complication rate was 7%. Hemodynamic success (defined as a rise in the ankle/branchial index > 0.15) was achieved in 82%. The average Society for Vascular Surgery symptom score was 3.4 +/- 0.9 before intervention, which improved to 1.9 +/- 0.8 following intervention. Within 3 months, 84% of patients demonstrated clinical improvement. Patient survival by life-table analysis was 38% at 10 years. The cumulative assisted patency rate was 71 +/- 7% at 10 years. The presence of two-vessel femoral runoff, two or more patent tibial vessels, or both was associated with improved patency. Limb salvage was 95 +/- 2% and 87 +/- 9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Using Cox proportional hazards analysis, the presence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or chronic renal insufficiency was associated with the occurrence of primary failure, whereas increased patency intervals were associated with the presence of immediate hemodynamic improvement. Use of a stent did not influence outcome. Endoluminal iliac intervention for TASC A and B lesions is a safe, durable intervention in patients with good femoral and tibial runoff. The presence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or poor tibial runoff is associated with failure.

Subintimal Angioplasty as a Primary Modality in the Management of Critical Limb Ischemia:Comparison to Bypass Grafting for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease

PURPOSE

To compare the 30-day morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and patency rates in patients with critically ischemic limbs treated with subintimal angioplasty (SA) versus standard bypass surgery.

METHOD

Between October 2001 and August 2003, 137 patients (74 women; mean age 70 years, range 43-92) with critical limb ischemia underwent subintimal angioplasty (n=88) or bypass surgery (n=49) for superficial femoral artery (SFA) or aortoiliac lesions. All patients had lesions classified as C or D according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus. Data was retrieved from hospital inpatient inquiry and VascuBase. Parallel group comparison was used in performing a prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was 100% for both SA and bypass grafting. Thirty-day survival was 100% in the SFA-SA and aortoiliac bypass groups and 96% and 93%, respectively, in the SFA bypass and aortoiliac SA groups. Limb salvage was 97% and 82% in the SFA-SA and SFA bypass groups, respectively; at the aortoiliac levels, the rates were 100% and 86% for SA versus bypass. Subintimal angioplasty significantly reduced hospital stay (p<0.001). Primary patency was not statistically different in the SA versus bypass groups; however, secondary patency was higher in the SFA bypass group.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequent clinical follow-up and a duplex surveillance program are necessary to maintain patency in this cohort. Subintimal angioplasty is increasingly replacing bypass surgery in the management of critical limb ischemia without compromising primary patency, limb salvage, patient survival, or subsequent vascular intervention.