Impact of transrenal aortic endograft placement on endovascular graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Degradation Phenomena on "Homemade" Explanted Aortic Textile Endografts

Objective

In the 1990s, the concept of “homemade” endografts (EGs) using commercially available materials was proposed in clinical practice for endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to analyse the ageing phenomena of these EGs in light of explant analyses.

Methods

The study focused on five explanted homemade EGs collected from 2012 to 2014. The explants were assessed in accordance with the ISO 9001/13485 certified standard protocol, which included naked eye evaluation, organic remnant cleaning, and microscopic and endoscopic examinations and analysis (magnification range from 20% to 200%). The observations report followed a classification based on 12 features assessing the fabric cover, the stitch filament, and the stents.

Results

The reasons for explantation were type 1 endoleak in three cases and aneurysm sac growth in two. The implantation duration ranged from 56 to 202 months. Sixty three per cent of the fabric surface lesions (holes and tears) were related to abrasion between the fabric and the stents. Up to 33% of the knots used to connect adjacent stents were broken on one EG. Other defects including running suture rupture and stent corrosion were also observed. The overall hole cumulated surface ranged from 0.377 mm² (56 month of implantation) up to 3.21 mm² (78 month of implantation).

Conclusion

In this study, various ageing phenomena on homemade textile EGs were identified and classified. The main damaging mechanisms were related to abrasion stress leading to tears and holes in the fabric, stitch ruptures, and detachment of stent segments responsible for serious EG deformations and further degradation.

•

Main homemade endografts damaging mechanisms are related to abrasion stress (friction wear).

•

Abrasion stent–metal, knot ruptures, and kinking phenomena were associated.

•

Some damaging mechanisms were related to the creation technique (one piece stent skeleton).

Prognostic Role of Severe Infrarenal Aortic Neck Angulation in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether patients with severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation have worse outcomes than those without severe angulation after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

DATA SOURCES

The HDAS (Healthcare Database Advanced Search) interface developed by NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) was used to search electronic bibliographic databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies comparing outcomes of standard EVAR in patients with and without severe neck angulation were considered. Pooled outcome estimates were calculated using the odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), using the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method, as appropriate. Random effects models of meta-analysis were applied. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Ten studies reporting a total of 7 371 patients (1 576 with severe neck angulation and 5 795 without) were included. The studies reported medium term follow up. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcomes (overall mortality: HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.88 - 1.85, low certainty; aneurysm related mortality: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.80 - 1.44, moderate certainty; aneurysm rupture: HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.66 - 2.99, low certainty). The hazard of type Ia endoleak (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32 - 2.61) and re-intervention was higher in patient with severe angulation (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.54), but there was no significant difference in the odds of adjunctive procedures (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.48 - 3.11), or the hazard of sac expansion (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.44 - 1.55) or stent migration (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.78 - 1.92). Meta-analysis of studies that conducted multiple Cox regression analysis showed no significant difference for any of the primary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Severe neck angulation may not be a poor prognostic indicator for overall/aneurysm related mortality and rupture in the medium term after EVAR but may increase the risk of late type 1 endoleaks and re-intervention; therefore, patients require close surveillance.

Outcomes of using endovascular aneurysm repair with active fixation in complex aneurysm morphology

OBJECTIVE

The ideal treatment option for patients with complex aneurysm morphology remains highly debated. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with active fixation on outcomes in patients with complex aneurysm morphology.

METHODS

There were 340 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR using active fixation devices, 234 with active infrarenal fixation (AIF; Gore Excluder; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) and 106 with active suprarenal fixation (ASF; 85 Medtronic Endurant [Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif] and 21 Cook Zenith [Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind]). Demographics, comorbidities, anatomic features, and outcomes were analyzed for patients receiving devices with active fixation. Outcomes of using active fixation in necks with <15-mm neck lengths, >60-degree infrarenal neck angle (β), >30-mm infrarenal neck diameter, severe aortic neck calcification or thrombus, and nonstraight neck morphology were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 340 patients, 106 (78 men; mean age, 74.5 ± 9.3 years at the time of surgery) received implants with ASF and 234 (191 men; mean age, 74.6 ± 8.9 years at the time of surgery) received implants with AIF. In comparing AIF and ASF devices, patients in the suprarenal fixation group had significantly shorter follow-up time (25 ± 17 months vs 44.3 ± 32 months; P < .0001). Patients in the ASF group had shorter aortic neck lengths (25.5 ± 15.1 mm vs 28.6 ± 14.9 mm; P = NS) and significantly larger infrarenal neck diameters (25.9 ± 6.3 mm vs 23.4 ± 3.2 mm; P < .0001) and aneurysm diameters (59.9 ± 11.6 mm v. 55.9 ± 10.0 mm; P = .002). Outcomes were similar between groups, with no significant differences in reintervention, proximal endoleak, sac growth, abdominal aortic aneurysm-related death, or rupture. Of the complex anatomic neck features investigated, neck diameter >30 mm and nonstraight neck morphology had the highest rates of reintervention in ASF devices.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of hostile infrarenal neck morphology, ASF appears to be used more frequently. Our data suggest that ASF may be useful for certain patients but may be unfavorable for others, such as those with wide necks or several difficult neck features. Nevertheless, further research is needed to evaluate more optimal treatment options, such as fenestrated EVAR, branched EVAR, and endovascular adjuncts such as EndoAnchors (Aptus Endosystems, Sunnyvale, Calif), in dealing with high-risk anatomic characteristics that may not be optimally managed with standard EVAR devices with active fixation.

Meta-analysis of Renal Function Following Infrarenal EVAR using Suprarenal or Infrarenal Fixation Devices

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

The effect of suprarenal (SR) as opposed to infrarenal (IR) fixation on renal outcomes post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to update current understanding of this issue.

METHODS

A prior meta-analysis was updated through a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses search for additional studies published in the last 3 years reporting on renal dysfunction or related outcomes post-EVAR. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken using SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 25 non-randomised studies comparing SR with IR fixation were included, totalling 54,832 patients. In total, 16,634 underwent SR and 38,198 IR. Baseline characteristics, including age, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiac disease, and smoking, were similar between the groups. There was a small but significant difference in outcomes for renal dysfunction at the study end point (SR 5.98% vs. IR 4.83%; odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.40 [p < .001]); however, at 30 days and 12 months there was no significant difference, and this did not hold up to sensitivity analysis. Incidence of renal infarcts (SR 6.6% vs. IR 2.3%; OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.46-5.29 [p = .002]), renal stenosis (SR 2.4% vs. IR 0.8%; OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.00-8.38 [p = .05]), and renal artery occlusion (SR 2.4% vs. IR 1.2%; OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.15-4.25 [p = 0.02]) favoured IR fixation; however, there was no difference in haemodialysis rates.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis has identified small but significantly worse renal outcomes in patients having SR fixation devices compared with IR; however, there was no difference in dialysis rates and a small effect on renal dysfunction, which did not stand up to rigorous sensitivity analysis. This should be taken into consideration during graft selection, and further studies must assess renal outcomes in the longer term, and in those with pre-existing renal dysfunction.

Improvement in Proximal Aortic Endograft Fixation: An Experimental Study Using Different Stent-Grafts in Human Cadaveric Aortas

Purpose:

To compare the proximal fixation characteristics of different types of stent-grafts (SG) and the adjunctive effect of a proximally placed Palmaz stent.

Methods:

Human cadaveric aortas were obtained at autopsy and cut into 30 aortic segments. Appropriately oversized (10% to 20%) commercial stent-grafts (Zenith, Ancure, Excluder, Talent) and 4 configurations of homemade Palmaz-based stent-grafts (polytetrafluoroethylene or polyester coverings each with no uncovered proximal edge or a 20-mm bare section of stent) were implanted 20 mm into an aortic segment and balloon dilated. Each segment was placed in an experimental apparatus to measure the dislodgment force. Bare Palmaz stents were used to reinforce the proximal fixation of the commercial stent-grafts, and the measurements were repeated. Manual anastomoses were made and their dislodgment force tested for comparison.

Results:

The median dislodgment force ranged from 6.5 N for the Excluder to 26.5 N for the Zenith (8.0 N for the Talent, 11.8 N for the Ancure, and 8.1 to 10.7 N for the various Palmaz stent-graft designs). There was no significant difference between the Zenith and the Ancure groups or between the Excluder and the Talent groups. However, the Zenith and Ancure devices required significantly higher (p = 0.0004) force (∼25%) to displace them than the other stent-grafts tested. With the Palmaz stent added to the proximal attachment site, the median dislodgment force for the different commercial endografts was significantly improved for all devices (p < 0.03): 34% for the Zenith device, 69% for the Ancure, 73% for the Talent, and 80% for the Excluder endoprosthesis.

Conclusions:

The Zenith stent-graft had the best resistance to dislodgment. An additional Palmaz stent placed at the proximal attachment site greatly improves endograft fixation regardless of the type of stent-graft. For complex aneurysm necks or for intraoperative type I endoleak management, an adjunctive Palmaz stent could be used.

Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using the EVT Device: Limited Increased Utilization with Availability of a Bifurcated Graft

Purpose:

To determine if the availability of a bifurcated graft would increase the percentage of patients eligible for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

Methods:

One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients were evaluated prospectively for endovascular AAA repair at a university referral center. Data were collected on eligibility for tube or bifurcated endovascular grafts, reasons for exclusion, aneurysm morphology, and the interventions performed.

Results:

Forty-six (25%) patients were eligible for endovascular treatment using the first-generation Endovascular Technologies (EVT) system: 19 (10%) for a tube graft and 27 (15%) for a bifurcated device. An unsuitable proximal neck was the reason for exclusion in 48% of patients (excess diameter in 27%, inadequate length in 21%). Unsuitable iliac configuration was present in 41% of those excluded; 29% of the common iliac arteries were enlarged or aneurysmal, while 12% were small or tortuous.

Conclusions:

Although a bifurcated graft more than doubles the eligibility of AAA patients for endovascular repair, the configuration of the proximal neck and iliac disease excluded the majority of AAA patients from endovascular therapy using the first generation EVT device.

Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using a Pararenal Fenestrated Stent-Graft

Purpose:

To report an unusual case of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) exclusion in which a fenestrated stent-graft was used to seal a proximal Type I endoleak.

Methods and Results:

An 84-year-old man with a 6.0-cm AAA underwent an aortomonoiliac aneurysm exclusion procedure that was complicated by a proximal endoleak. Because the patient had no right kidney, an additional stent-graft was designed to cover the right renal artery stump while preserving left renal perfusion through a fenestration in the graft material. This approach was successful in obliterating the endoleak around the proximal attachment site, but flow through the lumbar arteries remained.

Conclusions:

The use of a fenestrated stent-graft is feasible, but the type of fenestration in this case has limited applicability owing to the rarity of patients with suitable anatomy.

Risk factors and impact of proximal fixation on acute and chronic renal dysfunction after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using glomerular filtration rate criteria

BACKGROUND

The incidence of renal impairment relevant to proximal fixation of aortic endograft devices remains unclear.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 208 consecutive patients that underwent EVAR from 2006 to 2011. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was based on MDRD study equation. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were classified with ADIQ/RIFLE criteria and National Kidney Foundation criteria, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to evaluate progression to CKD. Multivariate regression model was fit to identify predictors for developing AKI and CKD.

RESULTS

Suprarenal fixation group (SF) included 110 patients and infrarenal fixation group (IF) included 98 patients. Both groups had similar demographics, baseline eGFR, and renal-protection protocols. There was a trend for decreased use of contrast in IF group (median: 93.5 vs. 103 cc, P = 0.07). AKI occurred in 15% of patients in SF group and 19% of patients in IF group (RR: 1.24, P = 0.47). The freedom from progression to stage 3 or 4 CKD in the SF group was 0.76, 0.72, and 0.49 at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively, while for IF group was 0.8, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively (P = 0.4). Increasing age (P = 0.07), lengthy procedures (P < 0.001), and baseline renal dysfunction (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for developing CKD. Contrast volume (P < 0.001) and ace-inhibitors (P = 0.07) were predictors for AKI.

CONCLUSION

Proximal fixation type has no significant effect on both acute and chronic renal function. Identification of modifiable perioperative risk factors may be used to improve renal function outcomes.

Placement of endovascular stent across the branching arteries: long-term serial evaluation of stent-tissue responses overlying the arterial orifices in an experimental study

PURPOSE

This study was designed to investigate the effects of stenting across the branching arteries on the patency and stent-tissue responses over the branching arterial orifices.

METHODS

Thirteen dogs were observed after placing aortic stents across the celiac arteries (CA), superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and renal arteries (RA). The animals were grouped according to stent types: large-cell group (n = 6) and small-cell group (n = 7). Angiography was performed to evaluate the branching artery patency at 2, 6, and 12 months after stent insertion, and the stent-tissue responses covering the orifices were evaluated on histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

All branching arteries were patent on follow-up angiography; however, three patterns of stent-tissue responses over the orifices were observed: neointimal layering, bridging septa, and papillary hyperplasia. Although neointimal layering and bridging septa were evenly observed, severe papillary hyperplasia was more frequent at SMA and CA than RA. Four RA showed less than 50% ostial patency, and localized infarct was observed in six kidneys (24%). The ostial patency tended to decrease with small-cell stent during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Various stent-tissue responses over the branching artery orifices are induced by the aortic stent covering the branching arteries and may not be easily detected by conventional angiography. Subclinical renal infarct also may occur despite patent renal angiography.

Early results of the Endurant endograft system in patients with friendly and hostile infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the newly released Endurant endograft system in patients with different aortoiliac anatomic characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study assigning patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with the Endurant endoprosthesis from February 2009 to March 2010. Two groups were studied, according to the presence of a friendly (group I [GI] = 43) or hostile (group II [GII] = 34) infrarenal aortoiliac anatomy. Hostile profile was defined as any (or combination) of the following measurements: 5 mm ≤ proximal neck length (Lpr) ≤ 12 mm, 60° < proximal neck angle (A°pr) ≤ 90° and 60° < any iliac axis angle (A°iliac) ≤ 90°. Primary end points included technical and clinical success, freedom from early or late secondary interventions, any type of endoleak, and aneurysm-related death. All outcome measures were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test was applied for comparisons between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean comorbid severity scoring was higher in GII (P = .018). The mean follow-up period in GI and GII was 12.9 ± 3.9 months (± SD, range: 6.4-19.8) and 12.4 ± 4 months (range: 4.2-19.6), respectively. Two unplanned conversions to aortouniiliac configurations were required in GI. The technical success rate in GI and GII was 95.4% and 100%, respectively. The requirement for intentional occlusion of the internal iliac artery, the requirement for cross-limb technique, the necessity of troubleshooting techniques, the procedure and radiation times, the frequency of postimplantation syndrome, and mean hospital stay were significantly higher in GII (P = .028, P = .013, P = .005, P = .037, P < .001, P = .032, P = .021, respectively). Two patients of GI died in the early postoperative period (one aneurysm but not device-related death), whereas no deaths in GII were recorded, yielding an overall 30-day mortality rate of 2.3%. No type I/III endoleaks were recorded up to the end of the study. Freedom from any type of endoleak, early or late secondary interventions, and aneurysm-related death at 12 months were found in 93.2%, 87.1%, and 93.3% of GI patients; respective values for GII were 86% (P = .21), 93.4% (P = .066), and 93.4%. The clinical success rate was 82.1% and 100% at 12 months for GI and GII, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Early (12 months) results suggest similar clinical performance of the Endurant stent graft system in endovascular treatment of AAAs with friendly and hostile anatomies, however, demonstrating more intra- and perioperative adversities for the last group. Larger prospective studies or even randomized trials comparing different new generation graft models are required to evaluate the comparable long-term results and possible expansion of EVAR indications for this specific endograft in adverse anatomies.

Five-year results for the Talent enhanced Low Profile System abdominal stent graft pivotal trial including early and long-term safety and efficacy

OBJECTIVES

The pivotal trial of the Talent enhanced Low Profile System (eLPS; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, Calif) stent graft evaluated short and long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). These data and a confirmatory group assessing the performance of the CoilTrac delivery system supported the United States premarket approval application for the device.

METHODS

The pivotal trial was a prospective, nonrandomized study conducted at 13 sites from February 2002 to April 2003. The study group (n = 166) underwent EVAR using the Talent eLPS stent graft. The control group (n = 243) underwent open surgical AAA repair. Data for this group were obtained from the Society for Vascular Surgery Endovascular AAA Surgical Controls project. Outcomes were compared at 30 days and 12 months. Additional 5-year follow-up was obtained for the eLPS group. A single-center cohort of 137 patients was the confirmatory group for the assessment of the clinical performance of the CoilTrac delivery system, with analysis of outcomes <or=30 days from the procedure.

RESULTS

AAA anatomy with neck length as short as 3 mm and maximum neck diameter of 32 mm were included in the eLPS group. EVAR was superior to open repair for periprocedural outcomes, including mean procedure duration (167.3 vs 196.4 minutes, P < .001), blood transfusion (18.2% vs 56.8%, P < .001), median intensive care unit stay (19.3 vs 74.3 hours, P < .001), and mean hospital stay (3.6 vs 8.2 days, P < .001). Freedom from major adverse events was 89.2% for EVAR at 30 days vs 44.0% (P < .001) and 81.3% vs 42.4% at 1 year (P < .001). Freedom from all-cause mortality and aneurysm-related mortality (ARM) was 93.7% and 98.2% for EVAR vs 92.4% and 96.7% for the controls. Through 5 years for the EVAR group, rates of freedom from all-cause mortality, ARM, aneurysm rupture, and conversion to surgery were 69.8%, 96.5%, 98.2%, and 99.1%, respectively, with one conversion to surgery, 25 secondary reinterventions, and five site-reported instances of stent graft migration. The technical success rate for the CoilTrac confirmatory group was 100%, with no aneurysm rupture or conversion to open repair at 30 days. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 1.5% (2 of 137).

CONCLUSIONS

In a population with challenging anatomic characteristics, EVAR with the Talent eLPS and use of the CoilTrac delivery system compared favorably with open repair through 1 year. Sustained protection from ARM, with minimal reinterventions, was attained through 5 years.

Computed tomography virtual intravascular endoscopy in the evaluation of fenestrated stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of computed tomography virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) in the follow-up of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated with fenestrated stent grafts.

METHODS

A total of 19 patients (17 males and 2 females; mean age: 75 years) with AAA undergoing fenestrated stent grafts were retrospectively studied. Pre- and post-fenestration computed tomography data were reconstructed for the generation of VIE images of aortic ostia and fenestrated stents and compared with two-dimensional axial and multiplanar reformation (MPR) images. Serum creatinine was measured pre and post fenestration to evaluate the renal function.

RESULTS

The mean intra-aortic length measured by VIE, two-dimensional axial and MPR were 4.7, 4.4 and 4.6 mm, respectively, for the right renal stent; 5.0, 4.9 and 5.0 mm, respectively, for the left renal stent; and 5.9, 6.0 and 6.0 mm, respectively, for the superior mesenteric artery stent. Comparisons of these measurements did not show significant difference (P > 0.05). The mean diameters of renal artery ostia measured on VIE visualization pre and post fenestration were 9.2 x 8.3 and 10 x 8.9 mm for the right renal ostium; 8.3 x 7.1 and 9.9 x 8.9 mm for the left renal ostium, with significant changes observed (P < 0.01). No renal dysfunction was observed in this group.

CONCLUSION

VIE is a valuable visualization tool in the follow-up of fenestrated stent graft repair of AAA by providing intraluminal appearance of fenestrated stents and measuring the length of stent protrusion.

Comparative analysis of renal function after treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with a suprarenal fixation device as opposed to open surgery

We analyzed the repercussions on renal function between suprarenal endograft fixation and open surgery in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) and determined the influential factors. Between 1999 and 2005, 59 IAAAs were treated with elective OS and 56 with SEF. The serum creatinine (Cr) level and its clearance were determined before the procedure, in the intensive care unit (ICU), on discharge, and after 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. A deterioration in renal function was considered to be a >30% increase in Cr or a Cr >2 mg/dL. A univariate statistical analysis and a logistical regression analysis were carried out to determine the predictive factors for repercussions on renal function. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of renal exacerbation between the groups either on discharge (p = 0.52) or after 1 month (p = 0.483), 6 months (p = 0.451), 12 months (p = 0.457), and 24 months (p = 0.682). The only significant difference was that detected in the ICU (p = 0.033). Diabetes mellitus, time spent in the ICU, postoperative intubation time, intraoperative transfusion, and transfusion in the ICU were factors that influenced the deterioration of renal function in the univariate analysis. The only significant factor in the multivariate analysis was the need for transfusion in the ICU. Exacerbation of renal function occurred in both groups independently of treatment type. In the immediate postoperative period, hemodynamic deterioration is more frequent in the open surgery group. Renal exacerbation tended to disappear in both groups during follow-up.

Endovascular treatment of anastomotic pseudoaneurysms after aorto-iliac surgical reconstruction

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of endovascular treatment of anastomotic pseudoaneurysms (APAs) following aorto-iliac surgical reconstruction.

MATERIALS

We retrospectively evaluated 21 men who, between July 2000 and March 2006, were observed with 30 APAs, 13 to the proximal anastomosis and 17 to the distal anastomosis. The patients had had previous aorto-iliac reconstructive surgery with a bypass due to aneurysm (15/21) or obstructive disease (6/21). The following devices were used: 12 bifurcated endoprostheses, 2 aorto-monoiliac, 4 aortic extenders, 1 stent-graft leg, and 2 covered stents. Follow-up was performed with CT angiography at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

Immediate technical success was 100%. No periprocedural complications occurred. Four patients died during follow-up from causes not related to APA, and 1 (treated for prosthetic-enteric fistula) from sepsis 3 months after the procedure. During a mean follow-up of 19.7 months (range 1-72 months), 2 of 21 occlusions of stent-graft legs occurred 3 and 24 months after the procedure (treated with thrombolysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and femorofemoral bypass, respectively) and 1 type I endoleak. Primary clinical success rate was 81% and secondary clinical success was 91%.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular treatment is a valid alternative to open surgery and can be proposed as the treatment of choice for APAs, especially in patients who are a high surgical risk. Further studies with larger series and longer follow-up are necessary to confirm the long-term effectiveness of this approach.

Suprarenal endograft fixation and medium-term renal function: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Suprarenal fixation is widely used in endovascular aneurysm repair. Numerous small, underpowered studies have concluded that it does not increase the risk of renal impairment compared with infrarenal fixation. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that renal infarction is more common with suprarenal fixation, but the effect on renal function remains unclear.

METHODS

Electronic abstract databases, article reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for series reporting renal function data after suprarenal fixation. There was considerable study heterogeneity with respect to key factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction and length of follow-up. Authors were contacted to obtain individual patient data for a pooled reanalysis using standardized criteria.

RESULTS

Of 46 potentially relevant citations, only 11 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Complete data sets were available for four studies (1065 patients), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for postoperative renal impairment in the suprarenal fixation and infrarenal fixation groups and compared by the log-rank test. Median time free of renal impairment was 38.5 months in the infrarenal fixation group compared with 32.4 months in the suprarenal fixation group (P = .0038). However, to account for significant methodologic differences, further analysis was required using a Weibull regression model fitted in open Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling (BUGS). The pooled hazard ratio for deterioration of renal function after suprarenal fixation was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-10).

CONCLUSION

Currently available data are insufficient to determine the precise effect of suprarenal fixation on medium-term renal function. Conventional Kaplan-Meier analysis of the pooled data set suggested that suprarenal fixation increased the risk of renal dysfunction; however, the effect disappeared when sophisticated statistical modelling was performed to account for study heterogeneity. A randomised controlled trial of suprarenal fixation may resolve this issue.

Endovascular aneurysm repair: current and future status

Endovascular aneurysm repair has rapidly expanded since its introduction in the early 1990s. Early experiences were associated with high rates of complications including conversion to open repair. Perioperative morbidity and mortality results have improved but these concerns have been replaced by questions about long-term durability. Gradually, too, these problems have been addressed. Challenges of today include the ability to roll out the endovascular technique to patients with adverse aneurysm morphology. Fenestrated and branch stent-graft technology is in its infancy. Only now are we beginning to fully understand the advantages, limitations, and complications of such technology. This paper outlines some of the concepts and discusses the controversies and challenges facing clinicians involved in endovascular aneurysm surgery today and in the future.

Effect of suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on the renal artery ostia: assessment of morphological changes by virtual intravascular endoscopy

PURPOSE

To investigate the morphological effects of suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on the renal artery ostia (RaO) by analysis of suprarenal stent wire distribution and vascular calcification across the RaO using virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE).

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients (11 men; mean age 75 years) from a single institution were studied following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith endograft system from September 1999 to March 2002. Imaging assessment included computed tomographic (CT) measurement of renal artery intraluminal ostial diameter and quantification and analysis of uncovered stent struts across the RaO and radiological determination of RaO calcification. Morphological changes following EVAR at 3 time points (before and within 1 week after stent-grafting, and at the most recent follow-up) were compared for each patient to determine whether suprarenal stent struts or RaO calcification affected intraluminal ostial diameter. Renal function was assessed by temporal measurements of serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

The renal ostium was distorted to variable degrees in all cases at a mean follow-up of 41+/-6.6 months. An increase in ostial diameter was identified in most patients if the right RaO was calcified when comparing the 1-week postoperative and most recent follow-up CT images (p<0.05). There was no direct relationship between the number of stent struts crossing the RaO and the morphological/dimensional changes (p>0.05). Renal function was not significantly affected.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts experienced morphological changes of the RaO to a variable extent at midterm follow-up. Although the presence of stent struts did not significantly affect dimensional changes, we observed that calcification at the renal artery ostium may influence the development of atherosclerotic effects as a direct relationship between the calcification and ostial diameter. Future studies utilizing VIE to determine the long-term safety of this technique in these particular patients requires investigation.

Endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the aorta and iliac arteries can occur years after aortic surgery and are at risk for rupture and erosion into surrounding structures. We report on our continued experience with patients who have been treated for these lesions with endovascular management as an alternative to traditional open repair.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the distal aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, or iliac arteries were prospectively followed up in a database. Patient comorbidities, initial aortic pathology, initial graft configuration, aneurysm characteristics, evidence of infection, type and configuration of endograft used, and follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1997 to 2006, 53 patients with 65 para-anastomotic aneurysms were treated with endovascular stent grafts. Patients who were originally treated for aortoiliac occlusive disease presented significantly later than those treated for aneurysmal disease (15.8 vs 8.9 years, P < .01) The initial technical success rate was 98%. Endoleaks were identified in six patients (11%) < or =1 month of surgery, and three required reintervention, including open conversions. Endoleak complications were significantly associated with patients who had symptomatic para-anastomotic aneurysms (P = .01). Perioperative mortality after endovascular repair was 3.8%. Overall mortality within a mean follow-up of 18 months was 49% and was significantly associated with older age at the time of endovascular treatment (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the aorta and iliac arteries is technically feasible and is associated with a low perioperative morbidity and mortality. Close follow-up is required to identify endoleaks. Long-term survival is limited in older patients. We recommend endovascular stent graft repair for para-anastomotic aneurysms in anatomically suitable patients.

Visceral and Renal Artery Complications of Suprarenal Fixation during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

The effect of suprarenal fixation of endovascular grafts on renal and visceral artery function remains undefined. This study aimed to determine renal and visceral artery complications following suprarenal fixation during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 112 patients who received suprarenal fixation (group SF) and 36 patients who received infrarenal fixation (group IF) in a single institution from December 1997 to April 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Median follow-up was 26 months (range 0.1-101 months).

RESULTS

Stent struts extended to or above the level of 106 (94.6%) right renal arteries, 104 (92.9%) left renal arteries, 49 (43.8%) superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and 7 (6.3%) celiac arteries in group SF. This group had 2 (1.8%) unintentional main renal artery occlusions, of which 1 was successfully treated at the first procedure with a renal stent. There was 1 (0.9%) SMA occlusion which resulted in bowel infarction and death. Group IF had no renal or visceral artery complications. There were no late-onset occlusions or infarcts. There was no significant difference in median serum creatinine between groups SF and IF at 1 month (p = 0.18) and 6 months to 12 months (p = 0.22) follow-up. The change in serum creatinine over time was also not significantly different within each group (SF, p = 0.09; IF, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, suprarenal fixation was associated with a very small incidence of immediate renal and visceral artery occlusion. There did not appear to be any medium-term sequelae of suprarenal fixation.

Surgery Insight: advances in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic methods and an increased awareness of their clinical significance, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a major source of morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair of AAAs, initially described in 1990, offers a less-invasive alternative to conventional open repair. The technology and devices used for endovascular repair of AAAs have progressed rapidly and the approach has proven to be safe and effective in short to midterm investigations. Furthermore, several large trials have demonstrated that elective endovascular repair is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality than open repair. The long-term benefits of endovascular repair relative to open repair, however, continue to be studied. In addition to elective repair, the use of endovascular repair for ruptured AAAs has been increasing, and has been shown to be associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. Advances in endovascular repair of AAAs, including the development of branched and fenestrated grafts and the use of implantable devices to measure aneurysm-sac pressures following stent-graft deployment, have further broadened the application of the technique and have enhanced postoperative monitoring. Despite these advances, endovascular repair of AAAs remains a relatively novel technique, and further long-term data need to be collected.

Durability of renal artery stents in patients with transrenal abdominal aortic endografts

OBJECTIVE

The management of renal artery stenosis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms continues to be complex and technically challenging despite advances in endovascular therapy. There is growing concern about the durability of renal artery stents in the setting of transrenal abdominal aortic endografts. This study reports a single-center experience of renal artery stenting with transrenal abdominal aortic endografts for patients with renal artery stenosis.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair preceded or followed by renal artery stent placement between January 1999 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively gathered endovascular database. Patients were surveyed after renal stent procedures with multidetector computed tomography angiography or duplex sonography. The surveillance data were analyzed for primary patency of the renal artery stent at 6 months, incidence of complications, need for secondary interventions, and changes in creatinine clearance (CrCl).

RESULTS

Sixty-two renal artery stents were placed in 56 patients (44 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 77.3 years (range, 61 to 94 years). Forty-one were placed before the endograft procedure, eight were placed during the endograft procedure, and 13 were placed postoperatively. There were no major or minor complications related to the renal artery stent procedures. Transrenal aortic endografts were used in 44 of the 56 patients, and 12 had devices with infrarenal fixation. The mean follow-up was 18.5 months (range, 1 to 73 months). The 6-month primary patency, which could be evaluated for 51 renal artery stents, was 97.4% (37/38) in patients with transrenal fixation and 84.6% (11/13) in patients with infrarenal fixation. The overall rate of in-stent restenosis was 8.5% (4/47) in the transrenal fixation group and 20.0% (3/15) in the infrarenal fixation group. The overall occlusion rate was 2.1% (1/47) in the transrenal fixation group and 0% (0/15) in infrarenal fixation group. Five (83.3%) of six patients underwent successful treatment of in-stent restenosis with placement of a new stent in all five cases. CrCl decreased in the total group by 4.2 +/- 11.8 mL/min, by 4.7 +/- 12.0 mL/min in patients with transrenal fixation, and by 2.2 +/- 11.0 mL/min in patients with infrarenal fixation.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a transrenal aortic endograft did not affect the outcome of the renal artery revascularization procedure in this cohort. Renal artery stenting in the presence of transrenal abdominal aortic endografts appears to be a safe procedure without adverse effect on renal artery stent patency or renal function.

Aortic Debranching for Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Stent Grafts

Endovascular repair of a descending thoracic aortic aneurysm may result in covering the ostia of the left carotid or left subclavian artery for proper proximal landing zones, and the celiac artery or superior mesenteric artery ostia in the abdomen for distal landing zones. To prevent possible complications of occluding the ostia of these vessels, the authors performed an innominate to left common carotid and left subclavian artery bypass as the first procedure in one patient. In the second patient they performed an aortoceliac and aortomesenteric bypass before stent graft placement. The stent graft repair of the descending thoracic aortic aneurysm was performed subsequently in both patients. This aortic debranching provides subsequent proper placement of thoracic stent grafts.

The Mid-term Effect of Bare Metal Suprarenal Fixation on Renal Function Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the mid term effect of proximal bare metal fixation design on renal function in patients undergoing endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Consecutive EVR patients for AAA from December 1995-2001 were included and grouped to either infrarenal (Group 1) or uncovered suprarenal (Group 2) fixation. Peri-operative renal function and at 6, 12 and 24 months was determined by serum creatinine (sCr mmol l(-1)) and Cockroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrC ml min(-1)). Changes in renal function were compared using non-parametric analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 179 EVR procedures during this six-year period, paired renal data was available for 135 patients at a minimal follow-up of 6 months (Gp1, n = 63; Gp2, n = 72). Median pre-EVR sCr and CrC were 113, 57 in Group 1 and 108, 58 in Group 2, p = NS. There was no significant deterioration in renal function within or between either group at 2 years post-EVR: median sCr, CrC values were 118, 56 (Group 1) and 111, 56 (Group 2), all p = NS.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests mid-term renal function remains unaffected following EVR of AAA, irrespective of proximal fixation type. Designs to improve stent durability and EVR applicability do not appear to compromise renal function.

Comparison of renal function after endovascular aneurysm repair with different transrenally fixated endografts

OBJECTIVE

Transrenal fixation of abdominal aortic endografts may provide a more secure proximal attachment with few deleterious effects with respect to renal function. This study's purpose was to determine whether different metals used in two commercially available endografts (Cook Zenith and Medtronic Talent) result in different effects on renal function when placed across renal ostia.

METHODS

A total of 140 consecutive patients, between August 2003 and April 2005, who underwent elective endovascular repair of an aortic aneurysm with a nitinol or stainless steel-based endograft with transrenal fixation were reviewed with a mean follow-up period of 5.5 months (range, 1-22 months). The main outcome variable was the percentage change in creatinine clearance (CrCl), which was determined before surgery and at the most recent follow-up. Multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze the contribution of various factors to any deterioration in renal function.

RESULTS

The 140 patients were predominantly male (86%), with a mean age of 75 years (range, 56-92) and a mean aneurysm diameter of 62 mm (range, 42-110 mm). The mean intraoperative contrast use was 67 mL (range, 45-160 mL), and after surgery these patients received a mean of 3 surveillance computed tomographic scans (range, 1-7). Nineteen cases (13.6%) required deliberate accessory renal artery coverage. CrCl did not change significantly after surgery; the mean change in CrCl at the end of follow-up was a 2.5% decrease. There was no difference in the reduction in CrCl between endograft types. Only 14.3% of patients experienced a greater than 20% decrease in CrCl. Multiple regression analysis failed to show a relationship between change in renal function and age, sex, aneurysm diameter, infrarenal neck dimensions, endograft type, coverage of accessory renal arteries, intraoperative contrast volume, preoperative CrCl, and postoperative computed tomographic scans. Length of follow-up was an independent predictor (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Transrenal endograft fixation results in little deterioration in renal function during intermediate follow-up. The few patients who do experience a decline in renal function do so independently of any features related to the initial endovascular repair, and there is no difference in renal deterioration between endografts with nitinol and stainless steel transrenal bare metal stents.

Intentional Coverage of a Main Renal Artery During Endovascular Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Symptomatic High-Risk Patients

PURPOSE

To describe the efficacy and morbidity of intentionally covering a main renal artery during symptomatic juxtarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

CASE REPORTS

Two patients with symptomatic juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were felt to be at prohibitive risk for open repair. Each underwent EVAR with intentional coverage of 1 main renal artery to achieve adequate proximal hemostatic seal. One patient died at 24 months; the second is symptom-free at 10 months. Both aneurysms initially decreased in diameter. Both patients had increased serum creatinine and required increased therapy for hypertension, but neither required hemodialysis. Renal volume decreased 48.7% and 68.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intentional coverage of a main renal artery during EVAR for a symptomatic juxtarenal aneurysm resulted in effective short-term AAA repair with no need for dialysis. Despite the increased requirement for antihypertensive medications and the observed decline in renal function, this technique provides an option for treatment of this difficult patient subset.

Outcomes of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Hostile Neck Anatomy

PURPOSE

The principal anatomic contraindication to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR) is an unfavorable proximal aortic neck. With increasing experience, a greater proportion of patients with unfavorable neck anatomy are being offered EVR. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients with challenging proximal aortic neck anatomy.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 147 consecutive patients who underwent EVR between December 1997 and April 2005 were supplemented with a retrospective review of medical records and radiological images. Unfavorable anatomic features were defined as neck diameter >28 mm, angulation >60 degrees, circumferential thrombus >50%, and length <10 mm. Eighty-seven patients with 0 adverse features (good necks) were compared with 60 patients with one or more adverse features (hostile necks).

RESULTS

Comparing the good neck with the hostile neck group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of primary technical success (p = 0.15), intraoperative adjunctive procedures (p = 0.22), early proximal type I endoleak (<30 days) (p = 1.0), late proximal type I endoleak (>30 days) (p = 0.57), distal type I endoleak (p = 0.40), type III endoleak (p = 0.51), secondary interventions (p = 1.0), aneurysm sac expansion (p = 0.44), or 30 day mortality (p = 0.70). The good neck group had a significantly increased incidence of type II endoleak (p = 0.023). By multivariate analysis, the incidence of intraoperative adjunctive procedures was significantly increased in the presence of severe angulation (p = 0.041, OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.05-9.04).

CONCLUSION

Patients with severely hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy may be treated with EVR, although severely angulated necks require additional intraoperative procedures. Early outcomes are encouraging and suggest that indications for EVR may be expanded to include patients with hostile neck anatomy.

Transrenal Fixation of Aortic Stent-Grafts: Short- to Midterm Effects on Renal Function—A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the short- to midterm effects of transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on renal function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for English-language literature was performed. Studies with at least 10 patients were included for data analysis. Only studies on transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts that included follow-up results for renal function were included. A log-linear model was used for meta-analysis to compare transrenal fixation with infrarenal fixation.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Because two studies analyzed the same group of patients, one was excluded, for a total of 21 studies. Comparisons between transrenal fixation and infrarenal fixation were found in seven studies. For transrenal versus infrarenal fixation, the combined odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and P value were found to be statistically significant with respect to postprocedural renal infarction only (combined odds ratio, 5.189; 95% confidence interval: 3.198, 8.420; P < .001). No significant difference was found between transrenal and infrarenal fixation with respect to renal dysfunction, renal artery occlusion, or endoleaks (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts seems to be a relatively safe alternative compared with infrarenal fixation in terms of short- to midterm follow-up. Postprocedural renal infarction, however, was significantly higher for transrenal fixation.

The impact of aortic endografts on renal function

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact on late postoperative renal function of suprarenal and infrarenal fixation of endografts used to treat infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 277 patients treated from 2000 to 2003 with three different endografts at two clinical centers. Five patients on dialysis for preoperative chronic renal failure were excluded. Group IF of 135 patients treated with an infrarenal device (Medtronic AneuRx) was compared with group SF of 137 patients treated with a suprarenal device (106 Cook Zenith and 31 Medtronic Talent). Renal function was evaluated by calculating preoperative and latest postoperative creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft formula. Patients who developed a >20% decrease in CrCl were considered to have significantly impaired renal function.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patient age, sex, aneurysm size, preoperative risk factors, dose of intra- and postoperative contrast, or baseline CrCl (IF: 69.3 mL/min, SF: 71.7 mL/min, P = .4). Follow-up time of 12.2 months was the same in both groups. CrCl decreased significantly during the follow-up period in both groups (IF: 69.3 mL/min to 61.7 mL/min, P < .01; SF: 71.7 mL/min to 64.9 mL/min, P < .03). Postoperative CrCl (IF: 61.7 mL/min, SF: 64.9 mL/min, P = .3), and the rate of CrCl decrease during the follow-up period (IF: -10.9%, SF: -9.5%, P = .2) was not different between the two groups. The number of patients with a >20% decrease in CrCl was not different between the two groups (IF: n = 35 [25.9%], SF: n = 41 [29.9%], P = .46). However, the magnitude of decrease in CrCl in patients with renal impairment was greater in patients treated with suprarenal fixation endografts (SF: -39%) compared with those treated with infrarenal endografts (IF: -31%, P = .005). This greater degree of renal impairment was not due to identifiable differences in preoperative risk factors, age, or baseline CrCl. No patients in these series required dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless the type of endograft used, there is a 10% decrease in CrCl in the first year after endovascular aneurysm repair. Suprarenal fixation does not seem to increase the likelihood of postoperative renal impairment. Decline in renal function over time after endovascular aortic repair is probably due to multiple factors, and measures known to be effective in protecting kidneys should be considered for these patients. Long-term follow-up with measurement of CrCl, along with renal imaging and regular blood pressure measurements, should be performed to detect possible late renal dysfunction. Prospective studies comparing suprarenal versus infrarenal fixation are needed to confirm those results.

The Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients with Concurrent Renal Impairment

INTRODUCTION

Patients with concurrent renal impairment and abdominal aortic aneurysms present a significant challenge in terms of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative management. This aim of this review was to determine the risks of surgery in this patient group and determine whether any clear management strategies exist to enhance their clinical management.

METHODS

Systematic review of published literature giving details of the outcome of open or endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with pre-operative renal impairment. Papers concerning the management of post-operative acute renal failure in patients with normal pre-operative renal function has not been included.

RESULTS

There is little data regarding patients with end-stage renal failure and AAA although these patients appear to have a high peri-operative mortality rate. In contrast, those with renal impairment do not have a significantly higher mortality rate than those with normal renal function, rather they have a higher risk of complications associated with surgery and may require more intensive post-operative organ system support than normal patients. Many have a transient deterioration in renal function in the immediate peri-operative period that will resolve. In the case of patients with ruptured AAA, it is not clear whether pre-operative renal impairment affects mortality.