Persistent collateral perfusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair does not lead to progressive change in aneurysm diameter

Endotension in the Closed Aneurysm Sac during Aortic and Iliac Cross Clamping: Implications of Pressure and Flow Measurements

Purpose:

To relate the mean and pulse pressures in the cross-clamped aortic aneurysm sac to the systemic pressures during open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). To correlate the intrasac pressures to the number of bleeding lumbar arteries (LA) and the flow pattern of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA).

Methods:

In a prospective study of 55 patients (45 men; median age 69 years, range 47–84) undergoing open repair, the IMA flow and the mean pressure in the aneurysm sac (ASPmean) were measured before and after aortic and iliac artery cross clamping. The systemic mean pressure (SPmean) was recorded simultaneously. The aneurysm sac (ASPpulse) and systemic pulse pressures (SPpulse) were calculated, as were the mean pressure ratio (ASPmean/SPmean) and the pulse pressure ratio (ASPpulse/SPpulse). Values are given as the median (range).

Results:

Cross clamping of the proximal aortic neck significantly reduced the mean pressure to 31 mmHg (14–64), with a pressure ratio of 0.39±0.14; the pulse pressure decreased to 0 mmHg (0–13) (p<0.001). Additional cross clamping of the iliac arteries did not alter the pressure levels any further. In the patent IMA (n = 23), an orthograde median flow of 43 mL/min (2–135) was measured; sequential cross clamping of the aorta and iliac arteries reduced the flow to −6 mL/min (–130 to +21) and −3 mL/min (–120 to +22), respectively. There was no correlation between the pressure ratio and IMA patency, its volume flow, or the number of backbleeding lumbar arteries.

Conclusions:

The aneurysm sac is still pressurized with no pulsatility after cross clamping during open AAA repair. The aneurysm mean and pulse pressures did not correlate to the number of backbleeding lumbar arteries. Finally, the pressure ratios did not correlate to the highly variable IMA flow pattern during aortic cross clamping.

Type III and Type IV Endoleak: Toward a Complete Definition of Blood Flow in the Sac after Endoluminal AAA Repair

In this document the authors continue to refine their seminal categorization of endoleak, a major complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. In addition to type I (related to the graft device itself) and type II (retrograde flow from collateral branches) endoleak, they propose two new categories: endoleak due to fabric tears, graft disconnection, or disintegration would be classified type III, and flow through the graft presumed to be associated with graft wall “porosity” would be categorized as type IV endoleak.

Endotension: An Explanation for Continued AAA Growth after Successful Endoluminal Repair

Purpose:

To present and analyze several cases that illustrate persistent sac pressurization following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.

Methods and Results:

Four patients with successful endovascular AAA exclusion presented in follow-up with an expanding aneurysm. Two had initial sac diameter decrease, but by 18 and 24 months, respectively, the AAA had enlarged and become pulsatile. There was no endoleak evident, but the proximal attachment stents had migrated distally in both cases. One patient developed endoleak with aneurysm expansion at 6 months; contained rupture occurred at 12 months. The last case had slowly evolving aneurysm expansion over 36 months but no endoleak. All endografts were removed and successfully replaced with conventional grafts. Intrasac thrombus was implicated as the means of pressure transmission that precipitated AAA expansion in these cases.

Conclusions:

Excluded AAAs can increase in size owing to persistent or recurrent pressurization (endotension) of the sac even when there is no evidence of endoleak. One proposed mechanism is pressure transmission via thrombus that lines the attachment site. Endotension may also represent an indiscernible, very low flow endoleak that allows blood to clot at the source of leakage.

Time-Related Alterations in Shape, Position, and Structure of Self-Expanding, Modular Aortic Stent-Grafts: A 4-year Single-Center Follow-up

Purpose:

To report the nature and ramifications of structural and positional changes over time in tube and modular bifurcated aortic stent-grafts.

Methods:

Two hundred ninety-one patients received endovascular aortic grafts (primarily Stentor/Vanguard) between August 1994 and August 1998. Follow-up surveillance (clinical and laboratory examination, biplanar noncontrast radiography, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography) has been maintained on all patients for 4 years. Changes in the configuration and position of endografts have been noted and their sequelae charted.

Results:

Three types of endograft shape changes have been documented: mild — slight distortions visible on plain radiographs (n = 90, 31.0%), significant — angulations reaching 60° to 90° (n = 65, 22.3%), and severe — angulations ≥ 90° (n = 10, 3.4%). Changes in position never gave rise to late migration at the proximal attachment site, whereas at the distal ends, the endograft easily retracted from the iliac arteries (n = 8). Structural alterations (rupture of the stent frame, sutures, or fabric, and total graft disintegration) were more common in the original Stentor model. Shape, position, and structural alterations were mutually dependent and led to secondary endoleaks (n = 26) and graft limb thrombosis (n = 37). Late surgical conversion was necessary in 3 (1.0%) patients.

Conclusions:

Tortuosity of the native vessels is a source of complication in long-term follow-up just as it is during implantation. Given the late appearance of complications in this patient cohort, it would seem that the durability of an endograft cannot be evaluated with < 3 years of follow-up.

Multilayer flow modulator stent technology: a treatment revolution for US patients?

Thoracoabdominal aortic repair is a high-risk procedure in most experienced centers, not only because of anatomical complexity but also due to the fragility of the patients in whom these aneurysms occur. Such repairs are complex, time-consuming and impose a systemic injury upon the patients, regardless of whether the repair is performed by open surgery or via a fenestrated/branched technique. The substantive risks associated with such repairs include death, dialysis and paralysis. The multilayer flow modulator (MFM) is a disruptive technology which promises a minimally invasive reproducible treatment option, with clinical results demonstrating physiological modulation of the aortic sac with abolition of spinal injury. The mode of action of MFM forces us to completely rethink aneurysm pathogenesis and, consequently, it has been met with much cynicism. We aim to uncloak some of the mystery surrounding the MFM, clarify its mode of action and explore the truth behind its clinical effectiveness.

Duplex Ultrasound Scanning (DUS) Versus Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) in the Follow-Up After EVAR

Introduction: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the gold standard follow-up modality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A potential alternative noninvasive and less expensive modality is duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS). Methods: We studied 314 follow-up paired scans (DUS and CTA) in 59 patients with EVAR. Results: Endoleak—Endoleak was detected in 23.7% patients. The sensitivity and specificity rates of DUS were 54% and 95.3%, respectively. All 9 endoleaks that needed secondary intervention were detected on DUS. Eight of those were identified within a year after EVAR. Sac size—The mean difference in maximum diameter between the DUS and CTA was ≤5 mm in 84.5% of cases and ≤10 mm in 97.1%. Graft patency—There was 100% agreement between CTA and DUS. Conclusions: Duplex ultrasound scanning was reliable as it detected all the leaks that needed reintervention after EVAR. Duplex ultrasound scanning showed similar results to CTA in detecting sac size and patency.

Durability of endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair: when does late failure occur and why?

The first commercially available stent grafts were unable to withstand the hemodynamic forces of the vascular environment. The past 15 years have seen a gradual improvement in long-term stent graft performance as designs evolved through the elimination of features associated with late failure and the replication of features associated with durable success. Clinical experience provides the following principles on which to base device design and implantation techniques. Few patients have an adequate length of non-dilated aorta distal to the aneurysm to allow implantation of an aorto-aortic stent graft; bifurcated stent grafts are usually required for AAA repair. Friction, column strength and tissue ingrowth do not prevent migration of the stent graft from its attachment within the neck into the aneurysm; some form of active fixation is required, usually in the form of barbs. Any movement between the apex of a stent and the overlying graft material will erode the fabric; stents and grafts need to move as a single unit. Nitinol is versatile, but fragile; Nitinol components must be polished to eliminate all surface irregularities and they cannot be subjected to compression loading, or excessive pulsatile movement. The neck of an aneurysm is unstable; it will dilate unless protected by a securely fixed, non-compliant stent graft. The aneurysm does not heal; freedom from risk of rupture depends on durable depressurization of the sac. The sole objective of image-based follow-up is the early detection, and catheter-based correction, of device failure. Once any given design has been in use long enough to identify its failure modes, the frequency of follow-up studies can be adjusted accordingly. However, it takes a long time to identify all the potential forms of late failure, and pre-clinical testing remains an imprecise science. New, or recently modified, devices cannot necessarily be assumed to be as durable as their predecessors.

[Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm--preliminary results]

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been introduced into clinical practice at the beginning of the 90's of the last century. Because of economic, political and social problems during the last 25 years, the introduction of this procedure in Serbia was not possible.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to present preliminary experiences and results of the Clinic for Vascular Surgery of the Serbian Clinical Centre in Belgrade in endovascular treatment of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

The procedure was performed in 33 patients (3 female and 30 male), aged from 42 to 83 years. Ten patients had a descending thoracic aorta aneurysm (three atherosclerotic, four traumatic--three chronic and one acute as a part of polytrauma, one dissected, two penetrated atherosclerotic ulcers), while 23 patients had the abdominal aortic aneurysm, one ruptured and two isolated iliac artery aneurysms. The indications for EVAR were isthmic aneurismal localisation, aged over 80 years and associated comorbidity (cardiac, pulmonary and cerebrovasular diseases, previous thoracotomy or multiple laparotomies associated with abdominal infection, idiopathic thrombocitopaenia). All of these patients had three or more risk factors. The diagnosis was established using duplex ultrasonography, angiography and MSCT. In the case of thoracic aneurysm, a Medtronic-Valiant endovascular stent graft was implanted, while for the abdominal aortic aneurysm Medtronic-Talent endovascular stent grafts with delivery systems were used. In three patients, following EVAR a surgical repair of the femoral artery aneurysm was performed, and in another three patients femoro-femoral cross over bypass followed implantation of aortouniiliac stent graft.

RESULTS

During procedure and follow-up period (mean 1.6 years), there were: one death, one conversion, one endoleak type 1, six patients with endoleak type 2 that disappeared during the follow-up period, one early graft thrombosis. No other complications, including aneurysm expansion, collapse, deformity and migration of the endovascular stent grafts, were registered.

CONCLUSION

According to all medical and economic aspects, we recommend EVAR to treat acute traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm, as well as in elderly and high-risk patients with abdominal or thoracic aneurysms, when open surgery is related to a significantly higher mortality and morbidity.

Endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair lead to nonuniform intra-aneurysm sac pressure

OBJECTIVE

This was a study of intra-aneurysm sac pressures in patients who presented with endoleaks after endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

METHODS

Twenty-five patients (18 men, 7 women) with endoleaks, age (IQR 68 to 80), underwent 31 direct intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements, DISP at 16 months after EVAR (IQR, 14 to 26 months). Diameter of AAA was 59 mm (IQR, 52 to 67 mm). Six patients underwent DISP twice. Tip-pressure sensors were used through direct translumbar puncture of the AAA except in three patients (transabdominal puncture in 2; endoluminal in 1). Mean pressure index (MPI) was calculated between simultaneously registered intra-aneurysm sac and systemic pressures. Values presented are medians with interquartile range (IQR).

RESULTS

Type I endoleaks (n = 1) showed MPI of 93% in the nidus and 62% in the thrombus. Type II endoleaks were associated with lower MPIs in the thrombus (35%; IQR 24% to 38%) when AAAs shrank (n = 4) compared with when the AAAs remained unchanged (n = 11; MPI, 78%; IQR, 47% to 85%) or expanded (n = 6; MPI, 74%; IQR, 58% to 87%; P = .019). The nidus of type II endoleaks (MPI, 79%; IQR, 70% to 90%) had higher pressure than the thrombus (45%, IQR, 34% to 85%; P = .047; n = 7). Successful embolization of type II endoleaks led to AAA shrinkage (n = 3; MPI reduction, 13% to 31%) or diameter stability (n = 3; unchanged MPIs, 37% to 44%). Type III endoleaks (n = 3) had MPIs in the thrombus of 33% to 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoleaks after EVAR pressurize the AAA sac nonuniformly, with higher, near-systemic, pressure in the endoleak nidus compared with the thrombus. Nevertheless, type II endoleaks in shrinking AAAs have lower intra-sac pressure than expanding or stable aneurysms, and successful endoleak embolization reduces pressure.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 12 Years of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair (ER) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a new technique, and reported rates of endoleak, conversion to open repair, rupture and mortality vary widely. The aim of this study was to estimate these rates from the published data, and examine how this has changed as more patients have undergone ER.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of publications identified through searches of the electronic databases EMBASE and Medline. All publications quoting endoleak, conversion to open repair, rupture and mortality rates for a series of patients undergoing ER were included.

RESULTS

163 studies pertaining to 28,862 patients undergoing ER were identified as relevant for the review and meta-analysis. The pooled estimate for operative mortality was 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.9 to 3.6%). The pooled estimate for type 1 endoleaks was 10.5% (95% confidence interval 9.0 to 12.1%), with an annual rate of 8.4% (95% confidence interval 5.7% to 12.2%). The pooled estimate of type 2,3 and 4 endoleaks was 13.7% (95% confidence interval 12.3 to 15.3%), with an annual rate of 10.2% (95% confidence interval 7.4% to 14.1%). The pooled estimate for primary conversion to open repair was 3.8% (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.4%), and for secondary conversion to open repair 3.4% (95% confidence interval 2.8 to 4.2%). The pooled estimate for post-operative rupture was 1.3% (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.7%), with an annual rupture rate of 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.5% to 0.8%). Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that rates of operative mortality, post-operative rupture and total number of endoleaks all fell significantly (p<0.05) over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a low mortality and a gradual reduction in vascular morbidity and mortality associated with endovascular repair since it was first introduced.

Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Complicated by Persistent Endotension After Endovascular Repair: Report of a Case

Endoleak and endotension may prevent the successful exclusion of an aneurysm after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The pressurization in the excluded aneurysm sac caused by endotension may lead to rupture of the aneurysm; however, the cause of endotension and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We report a case of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) complicated by persistent endotension after EVAR. Although no endoleaks were found on conventional double-phase computed tomographic scans, a thrombosed endoleak existed in the side branch and attachment site of the endograft. After treating the undetectable thrombosed endoleaks, physical examination revealed that the pressure of the excluded aneurysm had diminished, with shrinkage of the aneurysm. This case report suggests that a high-pressure undetectable type I or type II endoleak could be a major cause of endotension. Thus, postoperative evaluation of the attachment site of an endograft is important after EVAR.

Six-Year Experience With Talent Stent-Graft Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

To report a long-term experience with the Talent Endoprosthesis for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

In the period between June 1997 and June 2003, 193 patients (171 men; mean age 71.0+/-7.8 years, range 52-89) with AAA were treated with a Talent Endoprosthesis. Patients were clinically and radiologically followed in the postoperative period, at 30 days, and then annually up to 72 months. In addition to computed tomographic scans, a plain abdominal radiogram was also performed annually for structural assessment of the stent-graft.

RESULTS

Implantation success was 99.0% (191/193). Delivery system introduction was the cause of 1 failure, and the other patient was converted to surgery for intraprocedural device migration. There were 10 (5.2%) endoleaks (3 type I, 7 type II) at 30 days; all type I and 3/7 type II endoleaks were treated (93.3% secondary clinical success). Seven (3.7%) patients died in the perioperative period, including the conversion. During follow-up, 18 (9.3%) additional deaths occurred, and 4 new endoleaks (1 type I, 2 type II, 1 type III) were encountered. In up to 6 years' follow-up, the Talent Endoprosthesis did not present signs of material fatigue, but 1 component disconnection at 42 months led to death. There was no aneurysm rupture. After an initial increase in the aortic neck (1.2+/-1.1 mm) in the postoperative period, the neck diameters continued to increase until after the third year. An average reduction of 5.6+/-4.1 mm in the aneurysm diameter at 1 year was noted; the reduction gradually reached 14.1+/-10.7 mm after 60 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The Talent Endoprosthesis was an efficient alternative for managing AAAs, achieving low morbidity and mortality rates and a good long-term clinical outcome in this study. The Talent Endoprosthesis did not present signs of material fatigue over a 6-year follow-up.

Pulsatile Wall Motion (PWM) Measurements after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Exclusion are not Useful in the Classification of Endoleak

The pulsatile wall motion (PWM) of AAA is reduced after endovascular stent-graft placement. The purpose of this study was to identify whether PWM after endografting was useful in the classification of endoleak.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

162 patients treated with EVAR underwent pre- and post-operative PWM assessment with ultrasonography. Follow-up was 1-9 years. 111 patients had well-excluded aneurysms, three patients had enlarging aneurysms without any recognizable endoleak (endotension), 16 had type I, 31 had type II and 1 had type III endoleak.

RESULTS

The PWM was reduced from about 1mm pre-operatively to 0.24 mm post-operatively in well-excluded aneurysms. PWM remained stable during follow-up. Type I endoleak was associated with moderately reduced PWM (proximal endoleak 0.79 mm and distal 0.32 mm). PWM in patients with type II endoleak was higher (0.32 mm) post-operatively (p=0.002) compared to well-excluded aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

PWM is permanently reduced after endografting. The smallest reduction in PWM was in patients with type II endoleaks. However, the overlap between the groups does not allow reliable identification of patients having endoleak with PWM-measurements.

Frequency and Significance of Lumbar and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Perfusion After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE

To evaluate the frequency and influence of perfused side branches (lumbar arteries [LA] and inferior mesenteric artery trunks) on development of type II endoleaks (EL-II) and on volume changes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) after endovascular repair.

METHODS

Of 114 patients undergoing EVR of AAA, 89 patients (83 men; mean age 72+/-7.5 years, range 51-88) with >6 months' follow-up and no type I endoleaks were retrospectively analyzed to determine any relationships between retrograde perfusion, endoleaks, and sac volume. Data were derived from computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) scans taken before and after intervention, at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, and semi-annually thereafter in follow-up. Two groups were identified and compared based on their status at 6 months post EVR: without perfused side branches (group 1) and with perfused collaterals (group 2); group 2 was further divided according to the absence (2a) or presence (2b) of endoleak.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 24 months (range 6-36). Based on a total of 582 CTAs analyzed, 17 (19%) patients developed type II endoleaks (EL-II) during follow-up. There was a significant difference in the number of perfused LAs prior to EVR between groups 1 (n=44) and the 45 patients with postprocedural patent collateral arteries in group 2 (p<0.05); there was no significant difference between groups 2a and 2b (p=0.88) relative to the number of pre-existing patent collaterals. The number of pLAs preoperatively and the rate of type II endoleak were significantly correlated (p<0.05). No type II endoleak was seen in patients without perfused side branches (p=0.01). No significant differences in mean volumes were found between groups 1 and 2a (no EL-II), but significant differences between groups 1 and 2b were seen in later follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A larger number of patent LAs before EVR was associated with a significantly higher rate of type II endoleak. Patent collateral vessels were common after aneurysm repair, but the frequency decreased during follow-up. Persistent side branch perfusion was associated with increased type II endoleak after endovascular AAA repair. Significant differences in volume changes in later follow-up were seen between patients with or without type II endoleak.

Outcome of endoleak following endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

The most important complication of endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is endoleak, in which there is persistent blood flow outside the graft but within the aneurysm sac. Depending on endoleak type, there is an ongoing potential for aneurysm expansion or rupture. Conversely, some endoleaks may resolve spontaneously. Absolute indications for interventional management of endoleaks remain elusive due to the heterogeneous nature of leaks and uncertainty in predicting their outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all endoluminal graft recipients with endoleaks at Repatriation General Hospital over a 3-year period. Data were collected via a database maintained by the Department of Vascular Surgery, and hospital casenotes.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients underwent endoluminal graft insertion in the study period. Fourteen endoleaks were observed in 11 patients, representing an endoleak rate of 21.2%. There were three type I leaks and 11 type II leaks. One type I leak resolved spontaneously, one resolved immediately following interventional management, and one resolved 6 months after interventional management. Interventional treatment was undertaken in seven cases of type II leak due to increase in aneurysm diameter by 5 mm. Two type II endoleaks resolved spontaneously. Aneurysm diameter increased in two patients following radiographic resolution of their endoleaks. There were no cases of aneurysm rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial observation is a reasonable management option in most cases of type II endoleak, because some will spontaneously resolve during follow up. Those associated with increase in aneurysm size should undergo interventional treatment. Conservative management of type I endoleaks may be undertaken in extreme isolated cases.

Characterization of endoleaks by dynamic computed tomographic angiography

BACKGROUND

Current imaging modalities may not be able to detect endoleaks, differentiate between type II and type III, or localize inflow and outflow sources. We describe a new technique that can characterize endoleaks to guide secondary intervention.

METHODS

One hundred four patients with Zenith (Cook, Inc.) endograft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) were monitored by serial computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Endoleaks were evaluated with a dynamic CTA using a stationary table position, 24-mm beam collimation, and continuous scanning over 30 to 40 seconds to create a cine.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (12%) had endoleaks that persisted or appeared more than 30 days post-deployment. Five patients in whom the standard CT surveillance protocol could not differentiate type II versus type III endoleaks underwent dynamic CTA. This technique accurately characterized the endoleaks and localized inflow and outflow branches to guide the subsequent successful secondary interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic CTA is a useful technique to evaluate endoleaks for characterization and precise localization to guide secondary interventional therapy.

Proximal Type I Endoleak After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Predictive Factors

Proximal type I endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) are associated with a high risk of rupture. Risk factors for developing this complication are not fully elucidated. We aimed to define preoperative predictors for proximal type I endoleak and describe its clinical outcome. From a consecutive series of 257 patients who underwent EVAR, we selected 202 who had available pre- and postoperative CT scan studies. Proximal neck diameter, length, angulation, calcification, thrombus load (thickness, percentage of neck circumference coverage, percentage of neck area occupancy), and maximum aneurysm diameter were evaluated on preoperative CT scans. All postoperative CT and duplex ultrasound scans, supplemented with angiograms in selected cases, were reviewed for the presence or absence of endoleak. Device overlap and oversizing (relative to the proximal neck) were also determined. Type I proximal endoleak rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The associations between the variables listed above and proximal type I endoleak were evaluated by use of Cox proportional hazards models. Proximal type I endoleak occurred in eight patients, corresponding to a 3-year incidence rate of 4% (SE = 1.5%). The median follow-up was 340 days (range, 22-1954). Univariate analyses found significant associations between proximal type I endoleak and the following variables: percentage of calcified neck circumference (hazards ratio = 2.19 for a 25% increase, p = 0.019), aneurysm maximum diameter (hazards ratio = 1.98 for a 1-cm increase, p = 0.006) and proximal neck and device overlap (hazards ratio = 0.53 for a 5-mm increase, p = 0.007). The mean overlap among cases with and without type I proximal endoleak was 15.6 mm and 29.3 mm, respectively. When these variables were included in a multivariate model, all remained statistically significant. No significant association could be documented for neck thrombus-related variables. Thirty-nine (19.3%) patients had a beta neck angle inferior to 120 degrees . There was a trend toward a higher incidence of proximal type I endoleaks in these patients (p = 0.057). Device oversize relative to proximal neck diameter did not affect the probability of this type of endoleak. One patient survived an emergency open repair of a ruptured aneurysm after significant expansion. Six patients underwent endovascular reinterventions (4 additional proximal cuff placements, 2 proximal angioplasties). The mean interval for reintervention was 389 days. Distal migration (>or=5 mm) was identified in four cases (50%). Proximal type I endoleak is a rare complication after EVAR, but it is associated with a high number of reinterventions and potentially serious consequences. Patients with short and heavily calcified aneurysmal necks and large aneurysms are at increased risk of proximal type I endoleaks.

MRA is useful as a follow-up technique after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms with nitinol endoprostheses

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether MR angiography (MRA) is a useful tool for the follow-up of aortic aneurysms treated with nitinol endoluminal grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 28 patients treated with nitinol endovascular stents to repair an aortic aneurysm with CT angiography (CTA) and MRA. Eleven patients (group 1) underwent an MRA after a positive CTA for endoleak was observed. Afterwards, 17 patients (group 2) were scheduled for both follow-up examinations. The kind of endoleak that occurred and the maximum aortic diameter were compared. The sensitivity of CTA relative to MRA for detecting endoleaks in group 2 was calculated. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured in the aortoiliac lumen at the arterial phase in, above, and below the endoprostheses. Student's t-test was used to compare aneurysm dimensions and SNR measurements.

RESULTS

Three type III leaks were correctly assessed at both examinations; however, CTA was less sensitive (50%) than MRA in depicting type II or unclassified leaks. No differences in aneurismal size were observed between the two examinations or between arterial SNRs observed in or out of the devices.

CONCLUSION

MRA can provide all relevant information necessary for the follow-up of patients treated with nitinol endoprostheses, and performs better than CTA in detecting endoleaks.

What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension

Endovascular repair has been used over a decade as a treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and has become a widely accepted treatment method with a low rate of perioperative complications. Endoleak, perigraft blood flow outside endograft but within aneurysmsac, has been intensively studied during the last 10 years of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR). The natural history of aneurysms with endoleak and the true clinical significance of various types of endoleaks remains unclear. Type I/III endoleak has been found to be associated with aneurysm rupture, while the risk of rupture of aneurysms with type II endoleak and endotension appears very small. In endotension, the aneurysm sac remains pressurized, even if there is no evidence of an endoleak. Currently,it is accepted that type I/III endoleaks should be corrected, preferably by endovascular means, due to the risk of rupture. If endovascular repair is not possible, then open conversion should be considered. The risk of conversion should be weighed against the risk of aneurysm rupture. Treatment of type II endoleaks and endotension is more controversial. In those with aneurysm enlargement,secondary interventions are often performed.

Frequency and Outcome of Re-interventions after Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To describe frequency, type, and outcome of re-intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

Between September 1996 and December 2003, 308 patients were treated, with data collected prospectively. No patient was lost to follow up, but two were excluded (one primary conversion, and one post-operative death). Vanguard, Talent, Excluder, Zenith, and Quantum devices were used. Follow up required a CT scan before discharge. Initially, a CT scan was done at each follow up. Subsequently, we used duplex ultrasound and abdominal X-ray, with CT scan used selectively.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 36+/-22 months. Re-interventions were required in 47 (15%) patients, 31 (66%) elective and 16 (34%) emergency cases. In 32 patients, the primary re-intervention was successful; in 15 patients an additional 13 secondary and four tertiary re-interventions were required. A total of 72 adjunctive manoeuvres were performed: 49 endovascular (68%) and 23 open (32%). The success of endovascular re-interventions was 80%. The success of open re-interventions was 96%. Open conversions were required in nine patients (3%). There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

EVAR was associated with a low burden of re-interventions, with only 15% patients requiring re-intervention. Our long-term follow up, without regular CT, was simple and effective.

Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to study intra-aneurysm pressure after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in shrinking, unchanged, and expanding abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with and without endoleaks.

METHODS

Direct intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement (DISP) by percutaneous translumbar puncture of the AAA under fluoroscopic guidance was performed 46 times during the follow-up of 37 patients (30 men; median age, 73 years [range, 58-82 years]; AAA diameter: median, 60 mm [range, 48-84 mm]). Three patients were included in two different groups because DISP was performed more than once with different indications. Tip-pressure sensors mounted on 0.014-inch guidewires were used for simultaneous measurement of systemic and AAA sac pressures. Mean pressure index (MPI) was calculated as the percentage of mean intra-aneurysm pressure relative to the simultaneous mean intra-aortic pressure.

RESULTS

Median MPI was 19% in shrinking (11 patients), 30% in unchanged (10 patients), and 59% in expanding (9 patients) aneurysms without endoleaks. Pulse pressure was also higher in expanding (10 mm Hg) compared with shrinking (2 mm Hg; P <.0001) AAAs. Four of the nine patients with expanding AAAs underwent five repeated DISPs later in the follow-up, and MPIs were consistently elevated. Seven of the 10 patients with unchanged AAAs without endoleaks underwent further computed tomography follow-up after DISP; 2 expanded (MPI, 47%-63%), 4 shrank (MPI, 21%-30%), and 1 remained unchanged (MPI, 14%). Type II endoleaks (6 patients, 7 DISPs) were associated with wide range of MPI (22%-92%). Successful endoleak embolization (n = 4) resulted in pressure reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurement is an important adjunctive for EVAR evaluation, possibly allowing early detection of failures. High pressure is associated with AAA expansion and low pressure with shrinkage. Type II endoleaks can be responsible for AAA pressurization, and successful embolization appears to result in pressure reduction.

Type II endoleak in porcine model of abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable in vivo porcine model of type II endoleak resulting from endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), for the study and treatment of type II endoleak.

METHODS

Eight pigs underwent creation of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm, with a Dacron patch with preservation of lumbar branches. An indwelling pressure transducer was placed in the aneurysm sac. After 1 week the animals underwent EVAR with a custom-made Talent endograft. After another week the animals underwent laparoscopic lumbar artery ligation. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography was performed after each procedure. Aneurysm sac pressure was measured in sedated and awake animals.

RESULTS

All eight animals underwent successful creation of an aortic aneurysm and EVAR resulting in exclusion of the aneurysm sac. After creation of the aneurysm the sac mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 72.5 +/- 6.1 mm Hg and the sac pulse pressure was 44.8 +/- 8.7 mm Hg. Postoperative computed tomography scans demonstrated a type II endoleak from the lumbar branches in all animals. While aneurysm sac MAP (56.5 +/- 7.9 mm Hg; P <.01) and pulse pressure (13.6 +/- 4.1 mm Hg; P <.01) decreased after EVAR, sac pulse pressure remained, with type II endoleak. All animals underwent laparoscopic lumbar artery ligation, which resulted in further reduction in the sac MAP (38.3 +/- 4.6 mm Hg; P <.02) and immediate absence of sac pulse pressure (0 mm Hg; P <.01). Necropsy confirmed the absence of collateral flow in the aneurysm sac, with fresh thrombus formation in all animals.

CONCLUSION

We present a reliable and clinically relevant in vivo large animal model of type II endoleak.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We set out to show that aortic aneurysm sac pressurization caused by lumbar arterial flow in the setting of type II endoleak can be reproduced in an in vivo porcine model of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Indeed, in this model the aneurysm sac pulse pressure was a sensitive indicator of type II endoleak, correlating well with findings at computed tomography, and lumbar artery ligation eliminated the endoleak, as demonstrated on computed tomography scans and sac pressure measurement. Therefore we believe this in vivo large animal model can be instrumental in the study of many aspects of the physiologic features of type II endoleak.

Aortic diameter is an insensitive measurement of early aneurysm expansion after endografting

PURPOSE

To determine the sensitivity of various methods of diameter measurement to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size change following endovascular grafting.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients (59 men; mean age 68 years, range 47-84) with 3-dimensional reconstruction of 196 computed tomography (CT) studies (68 preoperative, 128 follow-up) were studied. Implanted devices included 50 bifurcated and 18 straight stent-grafts. All diameter measurements were obtained from reformatted CT slices perpendicular to the center of blood flow. Three diameter measurements were made for each study: (1) transverse (TR), (2) anteroposterior (AP), and (3) maximum diameter in any orientation (Dmax). Volume measurements were calculated from the lowest main renal artery to the aortic bifurcation. Changes in diameter and volume were determined by subtracting follow-up measurements from preop measurements. Diameter and volume changes >5 mm and 10%, respectively, were considered significant.

RESULTS

AAA volume significantly increased in 20 (15%) studies, decreased in 84 (66%), and remained unchanged in 24 (19%). Agreement between methods of diameter measurement (TR, AP, Dmax) and volume change were 35%, 15%, and 25% for volume increase >10%, respectively, and 70%, 88%, and 74%, respectively, for volume decrease >10%. The orientation of maximum diameter varied in individual serial exams in 19 (28%) patients. Three of 12 patients with a study showing volume increase failed to demonstrate endoleak.

CONCLUSIONS

Diameter measurements were not sensitive in detecting enlarging AAA after endografting. Volume measurement determined by 3D reconstruction is the preferred method for early diagnosis of patients with enlarging AAA that may indicate increased risk of rupture after aortic endografting.

Endoleak following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: implications for duration of screening

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) requires long-term surveillance for endoleak or increase in aneurysm diameter. We analyzed the natural history of and risk factors for endoleak development.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Endoleak is a common complication of EAR that can lead to aneurysm enlargement and even rupture. Following EAR, imaging studies are used to identify leaks since patients with endoleak may require additional endovascular interventions or conversion to open repair. No criteria currently exist for cessation or reduction in frequency of screening imaging studies.

METHODS

Data on 220 patients undergoing EAR were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used with the end point being new endoleak development. Potential risk factors included preoperative aneurysm diameter, number of negative surveillance studies, and postoperative increase in diameter.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients (24%) who underwent EAR had endoleak detected during postoperative follow-up, which averaged 19 months (range, 0.4-101 months). One, 6-, 12-, and 24- month endoleak-free survival was 90%, 80%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. Three leaks occurred after year 2, at postoperative months 24, 48, and 85. Increasing number of negative screening studies was negatively associated with risk for endoleak development (B = -3.122, P < 0.001), while increase in aneurysm diameter was positively associated with risk for endoleak (B = 0.072, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Risk for endoleak declines as the number of negative postoperative scans increases, but new endoleaks are identified as late as 7 years following EAR. Reduction in screening frequency cannot be uniformly recommended at this time. Patients with documented aneurysm expansion should be monitored carefully and endoleak should be suspected.

Is a Type II Endoleak after EVAR a Harbinger of Risk? Causes and Outcome of Open Conversion and Aneurysm Rupture during Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

There is still debate whether type II endoleaks represent a risk for the patient after EVAR. Treatment policies vary from fairly conservative to active intervention. In this analysis risk factors for type II endoleak and adverse events during follow-up were assessed. In addition, risk factors and causes for conversion to open repair and for rupture post-EVAR were studied.

METHODS

The data of 3595 patients, who underwent operation between 1996 and 2002 in 114 European institutions that collaborated in the EUROSTAR Registry, were assessed. To accurately assess the influence of type II endoleaks patients with type I, III and combined endoleaks were excluded from the present study cohort.

RESULTS

A combined adverse outcome event consisting of aneurysmal growth, transfemoral reintervention, and transabdominal secondary procedures (including laparoscopic branch vessel clipping) occurred in 55% in patients with type II endoleak at 3 years, compared to 15% in patients without any endoleak (p<0.0001). Conversion to open repair or post-EVAR rupture was not significantly associated with type II endoleaks. An independent association of device migration and expansion of the aneurysm with late conversion was observed. The cumulative incidence of aneurysm rupture at 3 years of follow-up was 1.2% for an annual rate of 0.4%. Variables that significantly and independently correlated with rupture were size of the aneurysm at preoperative measurement and device migration during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endoleak type II may not be harmless as it was more frequently associated with enlargement of the aneurysm and reinterventions. Large aneurysms and migration of the device were the main risk factors for rupture. The clinical implications of these findings may involve more frequent surveillance visits for patients with type II endoleak. Aneurysm expansion is a clear indication for reintervention. Patients with large aneurysms, 65 mm or larger, may also benefit from a more comprehensive surveillance schedule.

Variable sac behavior after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of core laboratory data

OBJECTIVES

The behavior of the aneurysm sac after endovascular grafting has been the subject of significant speculation. The importance of sac behavior is manifested by the correlation between aneurysm size or size change and risk for rupture, and potentially further extrapolated to define the need for secondary intervention. This study was undertaken to define graft-specific differences and the effect of endoleak on sac remodeling.

METHODS

Core laboratory data were obtained for three US Phase II clinical trials. Patients were included if they met anatomic inclusion criteria and underwent placement of the latest version of a bifurcated endovascular prosthesis. Unsupported Dacron (Ancure), supported Dacron (Zenith), and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Excluder) grafts were evaluated. Digitized images were electronically assessed for aneurysm size (area, maximum, minimum diameter) with National Institutes of Health Image software. Two blinded reviewers analyzed each radiographic study to ensure accurate image selection and establish the presence or absence of endoleak. A third reviewer adjudicated discrepancies. chi(2) analysis and mixed nonlinear modeling were used to analyze the results.

RESULTS

Of 1506 patients evaluated, 723 (227 Ancure, 343 Excluder, 153 Zenith) met inclusion criteria for the study. Mean follow-up was 23.2 months (Ancure, 31.3 months; Excluder, 19.6 months; Zenith, 19.3 months). The incidence of any endoleak was 39.1% (Ancure, 58.1%; Excluder, 34.7%; Zenith, 20.9%; P <.001). Type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size were determinants of rate of aneurysm shrinkage. Reduction in sac size was greatest with the Zenith graft, followed by the Ancure and Excluder grafts. Presence of endoleak had a moderating effect on rate of sac shrinkage with the Zenith and Ancure grafts; however, sac size increased in the presence of endoleak with the Excluder graft. Finally, baseline size was positively correlated with rate of aneurysm shrinkage.

CONCLUSIONS

The behavior of the aneurysm sac depends on the type of prosthesis, presence or absence of endoleak, and baseline size of the sac. Differential sac behavior must be considered when determining the need for secondary interventions, timing follow-up studies, and assessing success or failure of endovascular repair.

Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and significance of aneurysm enlargement, with or without treatment, in relation to the primary end points of rupture, surgical conversion, aneurysm-related death, and survival following endovascular repair.

METHOD

Aneurysm (AAA) size changes and clinical outcome of all patients treated from 1997 through 1998 during the Phase II AneuRx multicenter clinical trial of endovascular AAA repair were reviewed. Aneurysm dimensions and the presence or absence of endoleak were determined by an independent core laboratory, with enlargement or shrinkage defined as a diameter change of 5 mm or more compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Among 383 patients (89% men, 11% women, age 73 +/- 9 years), with a mean device implant time of 36 +/- 11 months (median = 39 months), aneurysm diameter decreased from 5.7 +/- 1.0 at baseline to 5.2 +/- 1.0 at 3 years (P =.0001). A total of 46 patients (12%) experienced AAA enlargement, 199 patients (52%) had no change in AAA diameter, and 138 patients (36%) had a decrease in AAA diameter of 5 mm or more. Significant risk factors for enlargement included age (enlargement patients were 4 years older on average than patients with aneurysms that decreased in size; P =.002) and the presence of an endoleak (P <.001). Among patients with endoleak at any time, 17% had aneurysm enlargement, whereas only 2% of patients without endoleak had aneurysm enlargement (P <.001). Patients with enlargement were more likely to undergo secondary endovascular procedures and surgical conversions (P <.001). Twenty patients (43%) with enlargement underwent treatment, and 26 patients were untreated. There were two deaths following elective surgical conversion and one death in a patient with untreated enlargement and a type I endoleak. Three aneurysms ruptured: one with enlargement, one with no change, and one with a decrease in aneurysm size; all three aneurysms were larger than 6.5 cm. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that freedom from rupture at 3 years was 98% with enlargement, 99% with no change, and 99% with decrease in AAA size (log-rank test, not significant). Freedom from AAA death at 3 years was 93% in patients with enlargement, 99% in no increase, and 99% in decrease (P =.005). Survival at 3 years was 86% with increase, 82% with no change, and 93% with decrease (P =.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair was not associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture or decrease in patient survival during a 3-year observation period. Aneurysm size rather than enlargement may be a more meaningful predictor of rupture. Close follow-up and a high re-intervention rate (43%) may account for the low risk of rupture in patients with enlargement. The long-term significance of aneurysm enlargement following endovascular repair remains to be determined.

The significance and management of different types of endoleaks

Development of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been accompanied by previously unencountered complications. The most challenging but least understood of these complications is the incomplete seal of the endovascular graft (endoleak), a phenomenon that has a variety of causes. An important consequence of endoleakage may be persistent pressurization of the aneurysm sac, which may ultimately lead to post-EVAR rupture. Data of 110 European centers were recorded in a central database (EUROSTAR). Patient, anatomic characteristics, and operative and device details were correlated with the occurrence of different types of endoleaks. Outcome events during follow-up, particularly expansion of the aneurysm, incidence of conversion to open repair, and post-EVAR rupture were assessed in the different categories of endoleaks and in a group of patients without any endoleak. Type I and III endoleak were associated with an increased frequency of open conversions or risk of rupture of the aneurysm. Device-related endoleaks also correlated with an increased need for secondary interventions. These types of endoleaks need to be treated without delay, and when no other possibilities are present, an open conversion to avert the risk of rupture should be considered. Type II endoleaks do not pose an indication for urgent treatment. However, they may not be harmless, because there was a frequent association with enlargement of aneurysm and reinterventions. Our findings suggest that more frequent surveillance examinations are indicated than in patients without collateral endoleak. The indication for intervention is primarily dictated by documented expansion of the aneurysm.

Endoluminal AAA repair using intravascular ultrasound for graft planning and deployment: a 2-year community-based experience

PURPOSE

To examine the effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for preoperative planning and intraoperative deployment of stent-grafts to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

One hundred seventy patients (143 men; mean age 73.6+/-7.2 years, range 51-89) underwent successful DSA and IVUS to determine suitability for stent-graft repair. Patients subsequently received the AneuRx (n=157) or Ancure (n=13) device; intraprocedural IVUS was used to survey the proximal endograft for proper apposition to the aortic wall.

RESULTS

Reliable preoperative IVUS measurements were obtained in all patients. Plaque morphology was assessed in 140 (82.3%) aortic necks; in 36 (25.7%), preoperative IVUS showed high-grade atherosclerotic plaque in the nonaneurysmal abdominal aortic neck. The procedure was successful in 168 (98.8%) cases (1 [0.6%] acute conversion and 1 access failure). There were 2 (1.2%) periprocedural deaths related to bowel ischemia. Four (2.3%) patients developed graft occlusion/kinking and 2 (1.2%) developed renal failure requiring dialysis within 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender (p=0.0247), a short nonaneurysmal aortic neck (p=0.0185), and presence of high-grade atherosclerotic plaque (p=0.0185) correlated with major acute complications. Over a mean 10.4-month follow-up (range 1-25), 11 patients died of unrelated causes; there was no known AAA rupture or device failure. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 1 year was 91.0%+/-2.8%. Sixteen (9.4%) patients underwent 17 secondary procedures for endoleak or graft limb occlusion at a mean 5.4 months after stent-graft repair (freedom from secondary intervention at 1 year 86.5%+/-3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that IVUS may identify patients at increased risk of major adverse complications following endovascular repair. The combination of IVUS and DSA for endoluminal stent-graft planning and placement provides excellent short- and mid-term patient outcomes.

Modeling endoleaks and collateral reperfusion following endovascular AAA exclusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect on intrasac pressure of stent-graft deployment within a life-size silicone rubber model of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maintained under physiological conditions of pressure and flow.

METHODS

A commercial bifurcated device with the polyester fabric preclotted with gelatin was deployed in the AAA model. A pump system generated physiological flow. Mean and pulse aortic and intrasac pressures were measured simultaneously using pressure transducers. To simulate a type I endoleak, plastic tubing was placed between the aortic wall and the stent-graft at the proximal anchoring site. Type II endoleak was simulated by means of side branches with set inflow and outflow pressures and perfusion rates. Type IV endoleak was replicated by removal of gelatin from the graft fabric.

RESULTS

With no endoleak, the coated graft reduced the mean and pulse sac pressures to negligible values. When a type I endoleak was present, mean sac pressure reached a value similar to mean aortic pressure. When net flow through the sac due to a type II endoleak was present, mean sac pressure was a function of the inlet pressure, while pulse pressure in the sac was dependent on both inlet and outlet pressures. As perfusion rates increased, both mean and pulse sac pressures decreased. When there was no outflow, mean sac pressure was similar to mean aortic pressure. In the presence of both type I and type II endoleaks, mean sac pressure reached mean aortic pressure when the net perfusion rate was low.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro studies are useful in gaining an understanding of the impact of different types of endoleaks, in isolation and in combination, on intrasac pressure after aortic stent-graft deployment.

The endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an update analysis of structural failure modes of endovascular stent grafts

Over the last decade, more than 25,000 endovascular stent grafts have been used to treat aortic aneurysms. Although results have been promising thus far, problems with endoleaks, material failure, device migration, and aneurysm rupture continue to be reported. Improvements in device material and design have contributed to the rapid growth and utility of these devices; however, material failure still remains a concerning mode for potential procedure failure. A review of the authors'experience with material failure and a review of the literature was conducted to help understand and comprehend the magnitude of this problem and try to determine its clinical significance.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: device-specific outcome

OBJECTIVES

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, while advantageous because of its minimally invasive nature, falls short of achieving the long-term durability of traditional open surgical repair. Problems such as device migration, continued sac pressurization from endoleak, and graft limb thrombosis culminate in a high rate of secondary procedures and failure to protect against aneurysm rupture. While prior studies hint at a correlation between these postprocedural events and specific device design, a single comparative analysis that correlates device attributes with clinical outcome has not been performed.

METHODS

Over 6 years ending in 2002, 703 patients underwent endovascular treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. During this time, five devices were used, ie, Ancure, AneuRx, Excluder, Talent, and Zenith, and six device-specific groups were analyzed; the Zenith group was subdivided into those placed as part of the multicenter trial (Zenith-MCT) and those under a sponsor-investigator investigational device exemption trial (Zenith-SIT). Results were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method for censored data, and the log-rank test was used to ascertain differences between device groups.

RESULTS

While overall survival was diminished in the Zenith-SIT group (P =.046), risk for aneurysm-related death was similar in all groups (P =.336), averaging 2% or less at 12 months. Among the total cohort of patients, freedom from rupture was 98.7% +/- 0.9% at 24 months, without demonstrable differences between groups (P =.533). There were no statistically significant differences in rate of secondary procedures, conversion to open repair, or migration. There were, however, significant differences in risk for graft limb occlusion and rate of endoleak between groups. Limb occlusion occurred most often with Ancure devices (11% +/- 4.6% at 12 months, P =.009). Endoleak of any type was most common with Excluder devices (64% +/- 11% at 12 months, P =.003), a finding directly related to increased frequency of type II leaks in that group (58% +/- 11% at 12 months, P =.001). While there were no differences in frequency of type I or type III endoleak, a trend toward increased risk for microleak was observed with AneuRx devices (4.0% +/- 1.3%, P =.054), and more modular separations were observed with Zenith devices (3.5% +/- 2.3%, P =.032). Shrinkage at 12 months correlated with frequency of endoleak in the device groups, and was most common in the two Zenith groups (54% +/- 7.3% in the Zenith-MCT group and 56% +/- 7.8% in the Zenith-SIT group) and the Talent group (52% +/- 9.7%) and was least in the Excluder group (15% +/- 7.9% at 12 months, P <.001). By contrast, sac growth occurred most often in the Zenith-SIT group (13% +/- 4.5% at 12 months, P =.034), possibly as a result of the challenging aortoiliac anatomy frequently present in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant differences in frequency of limb occlusion and endoleak between groups with different endovascular devices. Knowledge of these and other differences is instructional in development of next-generation endovascular devices, incorporating design features linked to satisfactory outcome while abandoning those associated with device failure.

Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery

Decision-making in regard to elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requires careful assessment of factors that influence rupture risk, operative mortality, and life expectancy. Individualized consideration of these factors in each patient is essential, and the role of patient preference is of increasing importance. It is not possible or appropriate to recommend a single threshold diameter for intervention which can be generalized to all patients. Based upon the best available current evidence, 5.5 cm is the best threshold for repair in an "average" patient. However, subsets of younger, good-risk patients or aneurysms at higher rupture risk may be identified in whom repair at smaller sizes is justified. Conversely, delay in repair until larger diameter may be best for older, higher-risk patients, especially if endovascular repair is not possible. Intervention at diameter <5.5 cm appears indicated in women with AAA. If a patient has suitable anatomy, endovascular repair may be considered, and it is most advantageous for older, higher-risk patients or patients with a hostile abdomen or other technical factors that may complicate standard open repair. With endovascular repair, perioperative morbidity and recovery time are clearly reduced; however, there is a higher reintervention rate, increased surveillance burden, and a small but ongoing risk of AAA rupture. There is no justification at present for different indications for endovascular repair, such as earlier treatment of smaller AAA. Until long-term outcome of endoluminal repair is better defined and results of randomized trials available, the choice between endovascular and open repair will continue to rely heavily on patient preference.

Controversies in the management of type II "branch" endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Successful endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is often defined as complete exclusion of blood flow within the aneurysm sac. Perigraft flow, also known as endoleak, is the most common complication following EVAR. Attachment site related endoleaks (type I) are generally considered to warrant some form of intervention due to the belief that they represent a risk for future rupture. Management of type II endoleaks, also known as branch or collateral endoleaks, is more controversial. Some advocate a policy of watchful-waiting whereas others treat all type II endoleaks as soon as they are discovered. The following review explores the controversies pertaining to the management, diagnosis and surveillance imaging, and treatment of type II endoleaks.

Endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms: initial experience of an endograft programme

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate early clinical results of elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms during the initial phase of an aortic endograft programme and to compare them with conventional open surgery.

METHODS

Between July 1999 and September 2001, all patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing elective repair were studied. The results of endovascular repair were compared with those of conventional repair.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven endovascular repairs (24 men and three women; mean age, 74 yr) and 25 conventional repairs (19 men and six women; mean age, 73 yr) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms were evaluated. The aneurysm diameters in the two groups were similar (mean, 6.1 cm in the endovascular repair group and 6.6 cm in the conventional repair group). The comorbidities of the two groups were also comparable. The duration of operation was longer in the endograft group (249 +/- 86 min vs. 206 +/- 56 min), while the blood loss was significantly less (600 +/- 486 mL vs. 1074 +/- 1220 mL). The length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the overall duration of hospitalization was also significantly less in the endograft group (1 +/- 1 d vs. 3 +/- 2 d in ICU; 9 +/- 5 d vs. 13 +/- 6 d of hospitalization). There was one hospital death in each group (4%), and the complications were similar between the two groups. During a mean follow-up period of 11.6 +/- 7.5 months, there was no rupture or open conversion in the endograft group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial phase of the aortic endograft programme, the mortality and morbidity were acceptable and comparable to that of open surgery.

Mechanical failure of prosthetic human implants: a 10-year experience with aortic stent graft devices

OBJECTIVE

The first endovascular stent graft was implanted to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm more than a decade ago. This technique has evolved dramatically with the growing understanding of metallurgic and fabric sciences and improved device designs. However the potential for stent graft material failure remains. This investigation describes the incidence of material failure, potential modes of device fatigue, and the clinical significance of these failures.

METHODS

Six hundred eighty-six endovascular stent grafts were used to treat patients with aortic aneurysms. Device fatigue in the form of stent, suture fracture, or graft wear was identified with an analysis of follow-up radiographs and explanted stent grafts. A review of patient clinical histories, spiral computed tomographic scan studies, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersion spectroscopy of explanted devices was conducted to evaluate the modes and consequences of failure.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were identified with device fatigue, 49 of whom had abdominal endovascular repairs and 11 of whom had thoracic repairs. Of the 60 patients with stent graft fatigue, 43 patients had metallic stent fractures, 14 had suture disruptions, and three had graft holes. These material failures occurred within seven distinct stent graft designs. The average time to the recognition of failure was 19 months, with a mean follow-up period of 8 months since the event was identified. Eleven patients died, and one was lost to follow-up 2 years after identification of a stent fracture. The remaining patients are presently being followed eoyj physical examination, plain film radiograph, and computed tomographic scans for clinical sequelae of device fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular stent graft fatigue has been recognized in numerous devices after aortic implantation. Fatigue may take the form of stent, graft, or suture failure, with certain modes unique to specific stent graft devices. The clinical significance of stent graft material failure remains uncertain.