Intravascular ultrasonography allows accurate assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an in vitro validation study

The cardiovascular pathologist in the aortic team

Aortic diseases require a multidisciplinary management for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up with better outcomes in referral centers using a team-based approach. The setting up of a multi-disciplinary aortic team for the discussion of complex cases has been already proposed; it is also supported by the ACC/AHA. Surgeons and radiologists, more or less other physicians such as cardiologists, geneticists, rheumatologists/internal medicine specialists and pathologists are involved into such a team. The role of the cardiovascular pathologist is to examine the aortic specimens, to diagnose and classify the aortic lesions. Herein, the role of the pathologist in the aortic team is discussed and the pathobiology of aortic diseases is reviewed for reference by pathologists. The aortic specimens are mainly obtained from emergency or elective surgical procedures on the thoracic aorta, less frequently from organ/tissue (including cardiac or heart valve) donors, post-mortem procedures or abdominal aortic surgery. In the last decade, together with the progress of medical sciences, the histological definitions and classifications of the aortic pathology are undergoing thorough revisions that are addressed to an etiopathogenetic approach because of possible clinico-pathological correlations, therapeutic and prognostic impact. Pathologists may also have an important role in research and teaching. Therefore, histological analyses of the aortic specimens require adequate sample processing and pathologist expertise because histology contributes to definite diagnosis, correct management of patients and even (in genetic diseases) families, but also to research in the challenging field of aortopathies.

Diagnostic imaging capabilities of the Ocelot -Optical Coherence Tomography System, ex-vivo evaluation and clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution sub-surface imaging modality using near-infrared light to provide accurate and high contrast intra-vascular images. This enables accurate assessment of diseased arteries before and after intravascular intervention. This study was designed to corroborate diagnostic imaging equivalence between the Ocelot and the Dragonfly OCT systems with regards to the intravascular features that are most important in clinical management of patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. These intravascular features were then corroborated in vivo during treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) pathology using the Ocelot catheter.

METHODS

In order to compare the diagnostic information obtained by Ocelot (Avinger Inc., Redwood City, CA) and Dragonfly (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN) OCT systems, we utilized ex-vivo preparations of arterial segments. Ocelot and Dragonfly catheters were inserted into identical cadaveric femoral peripheral arteries for image acquisition and interpretation. Three independent physician interpreters assessed the images to establish accuracy and sensitivity of the diagnostic information. Histologic evaluation of the corresponding arterial segments provided the gold standard for image interpretation. In vivo clinical images were obtained during therapeutic interventions that included crossing of peripheral chronic total occlusions (CTOs) using the Ocelot catheter.

RESULTS

Strong concordance was demonstrated when matching image characteristics between both OCT systems and histology. The Dragonfly and Ocelot system's vessel features were interpreted with high sensitivity (91.1-100%) and specificity (86.7-100%). Inter-observer concordance was documented with excellent correlation across all vessel features. The clinical benefit that the Ocelot OCT system provided was demonstrated by comparable procedural images acquired at the point of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates equivalence of image acquisition and consistent physician interpretation of images acquired by the Ocelot and the Dragonfly OCT systems in-spite of distinct image processing algorithms and catheter configurations. This represents a dramatic shift away from both fluoroscopic imaging and diagnostic-only OCT imaging during peripheral arterial intervention towards therapeutic devices that incorporate real time diagnostic OCT imaging. In the clinical practice, these diagnostic capabilities have translated to best-in-class safety and efficacy for CTO crossing using the Ocelot catheter.

Basics of intravascular ultrasound: An essential tool for the endovascular surgeon

The concept of catheter-based ultrasound imaging was first introduced in the early 1970s. Since its inception, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) technology has become more user-friendly because of improvements in both the catheters and computer-driven imaging platforms. IVUS catheters enable luminal and transmural cross-sectional imaging of coronary and peripheral blood vessels with high-dimensional accuracy and detailed information about lesion morphology. With the advent of endovascular techniques in both the coronary and peripheral vasculature, IVUS has emerged as a useful and necessary adjunct. In addition to providing diagnostic information, IVUS enables optimal choice of appropriate angioplasty technique, endovascular device guidance, and controlled assessment of the efficacy of interventions. In this review we discuss the design and function of available IVUS catheters, imaging techniques and interpretation, and the present and future clinical utility in peripheral endovascular interventions.

Value of intravascular ultrasound for endovascular stent-graft placement in aortic dissection and aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Endovascular stent-graft placement is a new concept for the treatment of aortic dissection and aneurysm. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with established diagnostic features may be instrumental in guiding endovascular procedures.

METHODS

We performed IVUS and digital angiography before, during, and after implantation of 47 stent grafts in 40 patients with Stanford type B dissection (26 patients, 28 stent grafts), thoracic aneurysm (9 patients, 11 stent grafts), and abdominal aneurysm (5 patients, 8 stent grafts).

RESULTS

IVUS could clearly identify the aortic anatomy and differentiate between true and false lumen in all cases of dissection. In four patients with type B dissection extending from the thoracic to the abdominal aorta the true lumen was exclusively identified by IVUS, and thus, essential for safe execution of the procedure. In another patient stent-graft placement in the aorta was optimized by covering a second entry detected by IVUS, but undetected by angiography. The site of stent implantation, the true and false lumen, as well as entry and reentry were always identified in both thoracic and abdominal aorta. In comparison with angiography, IVUS information led to additional balloon molding due to incomplete stent apposition in seven cases.

CONCLUSIONS

As an adjunctive imaging modality IVUS is likely to improve stent-graft placement in aortic type B dissection, especially in patients with abdominal extension.

Endoluminal AAA repair using intravascular ultrasound for graft planning and deployment: a 2-year community-based experience

PURPOSE

To examine the effectiveness of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for preoperative planning and intraoperative deployment of stent-grafts to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

One hundred seventy patients (143 men; mean age 73.6+/-7.2 years, range 51-89) underwent successful DSA and IVUS to determine suitability for stent-graft repair. Patients subsequently received the AneuRx (n=157) or Ancure (n=13) device; intraprocedural IVUS was used to survey the proximal endograft for proper apposition to the aortic wall.

RESULTS

Reliable preoperative IVUS measurements were obtained in all patients. Plaque morphology was assessed in 140 (82.3%) aortic necks; in 36 (25.7%), preoperative IVUS showed high-grade atherosclerotic plaque in the nonaneurysmal abdominal aortic neck. The procedure was successful in 168 (98.8%) cases (1 [0.6%] acute conversion and 1 access failure). There were 2 (1.2%) periprocedural deaths related to bowel ischemia. Four (2.3%) patients developed graft occlusion/kinking and 2 (1.2%) developed renal failure requiring dialysis within 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender (p=0.0247), a short nonaneurysmal aortic neck (p=0.0185), and presence of high-grade atherosclerotic plaque (p=0.0185) correlated with major acute complications. Over a mean 10.4-month follow-up (range 1-25), 11 patients died of unrelated causes; there was no known AAA rupture or device failure. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of survival at 1 year was 91.0%+/-2.8%. Sixteen (9.4%) patients underwent 17 secondary procedures for endoleak or graft limb occlusion at a mean 5.4 months after stent-graft repair (freedom from secondary intervention at 1 year 86.5%+/-3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that IVUS may identify patients at increased risk of major adverse complications following endovascular repair. The combination of IVUS and DSA for endoluminal stent-graft planning and placement provides excellent short- and mid-term patient outcomes.

IVUS guidance of thoracic and complex abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-graft repairs using an intracardiac echocardiography probe: preliminary report

PURPOSE

To report our learning experience using an intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) probe to guide endovascular aortic procedures.

METHODS

Between November 1999 and July 2001, 17 patients (12 men; mean age 73.1+/-2.3 years) underwent endovascular repair of 9 thoracic, 6 complex abdominal, and 2 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The most suitable dimensions and configuration of the stent-graft were based on preoperative computed tomographic (CTA) or magnetic resonance (MRA) angiography. Intraoperative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was obtained using a 9-F, 9-MHz ICE probe, 110 cm in length, inserted through a 10-F, 55 degrees precurved long polyethylene sheath.

RESULTS

The endografts were deployed as planned by CTA or MRA. Before stent-graft deployment, interrogation with the ICE probe visualized the aortic arch and descending thoracoabdominal aorta without position-related artefacts and identified the sites of stent-graft fixation. After stent-graft deployment, visualization with the ICE probe detected the need for additional procedures in 8 patients, including 2 incompletely expanded thoracic grafts, which were treated with adjunctive balloon angioplasty. In 1 patient, ICE probe interrogation determined that the lesion was inappropriate for endovascular exclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE probe interrogation provides accurate information on the anatomy of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms and allows rapid identification of attachment sites and stent-graft characteristics. It might be considered as a valid imaging modality for monitoring all phases of endovascular procedures.

Intravascular ultrasound aids in the performance of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective review was to assess the accuracy of aortic measurements with intravascular ultrasound scan (IVUS) compared with computed tomographic (CT) scan and to assess the role of IVUS in the performance of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients undergoing repair of AAA with the AneuRx stent graft (Medtronic AVE, Inc, Santa Rosa, Calif) underwent measurement with CT scan and IVUS. The initial selection of stent graft size was made on the basis of the CT scan measurements, but the final decision for size was made on the basis of the IVUS measurements. Standard measurements of a phantom tube obtained with IVUS, CT scan, and digital caliper were also compared.

RESULTS

IVUS measurements of the phantom standard agreed closely with CT scan measurements. However, stent graft size initially selected with CT measurement was altered in 28% of cases on the basis of intraoperative IVUS measurements. No type I endoleaks were encountered in our series, and no aortic cuffs were necessary for endoleak repair.

CONCLUSION

IVUS accurately measures the aorta for selection of stent grafts for endovascular repair of AAA and may prevent type I endoleaks and remedial procedures for their repair.

Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound for diameter measurement of phantom arteries

BACKGROUND

Uniplanar quantitative angiography (QA) is the standard method for measuring vessel diameter during surgical and endovascular procedures. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), a relatively new technology, is another means of obtaining this measurement. This study was designed to validate the accuracy of these two modalities by comparing each to direct caliper measurement, the gold standard, using phantom femoral artery segments (PAS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PAS diameter was measured with a 12.5-MHz mechanically rotating IVUS catheter (Boston Scientific Corp.) and QA (OEC Corp.) was compared to the direct caliper measurement (Mitutoyo Corp.) at 60 different locations within PAS. At each location minimal lumen diameter and perpendicular lumen diameter were measured and their mean was calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCC) between direct caliper measurement and IVUS and uniplanar and biplanar angiography were calculated. Fisher's Z transformation was used to compare the correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The ICCC for IVUS was 0.89. The ICCCs for uniplanar and biplanar angiography were 0.73 and 0.82, respectively. IVUS correlated more closely with direct caliper measurement than uniplanar and biplanar angiography (P = 0.00008, 0.02) Biplanar angiography correlated more closely with direct caliper measurement than uniplanar angiography (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

IVUS more accurately measures lumen diameter than uniplanar or biplanar angiography. Diameter measurement with biplanar angiography is more accurate than uniplanar angiography.

Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm necks

PURPOSE

To document the accuracy of an automated analysis system for measuring lumen diameter and neck lengths of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images and to describe additional features associated with 3-dimensional (3D) IVUS imaging.

METHODS

Twenty-two aortic aneurysms were studied with IVUS. Lumen diameters obtained using the automated analysis system were compared with manual measurements from axial IVUS scans, as were neck lengths obtained using automated analysis versus those measured with the aid of a displacement sensing device. Automated analyses were repeated by a second observer. Agreement was expressed as the coefficient of variation (CV).

RESULTS

Twenty proximal aortic, 6 distal aortic, and 3 iliac necks were available for analysis. Comparison between automated analysis and manual measurements for lumen diameter revealed a difference of 0.45 +/- 0.42 mm (mean +/- SD, Pearson's r = 0.99, p < 0.001, CV = 2.1%) and a difference of 0.05 +/- 0.12 cm (r = 0.99, p = 0.04, CV = 4.1%) for neck length. Interobserver difference for lumen diameter was 0.13 +/- 0.66 mm (r = 0.99, p < 0.001, CV = 3.4%) and 0.05 +/- 0.11 cm for length measurements (r = 0.99, p = 0.02, CV = 3.5%). The 3D IVUS imaging facilitated the identification of neck configuration.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated analysis of IVUS images allows accurate measurement of the lumen diameter of proximal and distal AAA necks and gives length measurements comparable to those of manual analysis. Longitudinal display of IVUS images aids in the elucidation of neck anatomy.

The value of intraoperative intravascular ultrasound for determining stent graft size (excluding abdominal aortic aneurysm) with a modular system

Since the introduction of endovascular stent grafts at our institution we have used intraoperative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to definitively determine stent graft size. In this study, expected stent graft size, based on preoperative helical CT scan measurements, was compared with the actual final size, based on intraoperative IVUS measurements. Between December 1996 and January 1998, 54 patients were treated with an AneuRxTM bifurcated stent graft. Preoperatively all patients underwent angiography and helical CT scanning. Expected stent graft size was determined according to these measurements. The final stent graft size was based on IVUS measurements acquired during the procedure. Differences in expected and final size were compared and follow-up endoleaks were also noted. Differences in diameter measurements between CT and IVUS were compared using the paired Student's t-test. Differences in expected and chosen stent graft length were compared using the McNemar's test for paired proportions of binomial outcomes. Our results showed that helical CT scanning overestimates diameter and underestimates length. This underestimation of length is explained by the tortuosity of the aorta and iliac arteries while using axial slices of the CT scan. The last-minute corrections based on the intraoperative IVUS measurements did not result in a high incidence of endoleaks at fixation zones. In our opinion, the possibility of making final corrections in the choice of diameter or length of the stent graft is the additional value of intraoperative IVUS.

Accurate assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with intravascular ultrasound scanning: validation with computed tomographic angiography

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) parameters of abdominal aortic aneurysm, used for endovascular grafting, in comparison with computed tomographic angiography (CTA).

METHODS

This study was designed as a descriptive study. Between March 1997 and March 1998, 16 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms were studied with angiography, IVUS (12.5 MHz), and CTA. The length of the aneurysm and the length and lumen diameter of the proximal and distal neck obtained with IVUS were compared with the data obtained with CTA. The measurements with IVUS were repeated by a second observer to assess the reproducibility. Tomographic IVUS images were reconstructed into a longitudinal format.

RESULTS

IVUS results identified 31 of 32 renal arteries and four of five accessory renal arteries. A comparison of the length measurements of the aneurysm and the proximal and distal neck obtained with IVUS and CTA revealed a correlation of 0.99 (P <.001), with a coefficient of variation of 9%. IVUS results tended to underestimate the length as compared with the CTA results (0.48 +/- 0.52 cm; P <.001). A comparison of the lumen diameter measurements of the proximal and distal neck derived from IVUS and CTA showed a correlation of 0.93 (P <.001), with a coefficient of variation of 9%. IVUS results tended to underestimate aneurysm neck diameter as compared with CTA results (0.68 +/- 1.76 mm; P =.006). Interobserver agreement of IVUS length and diameter measurements showed a good correlation (r = 1.0; P <.001), with coefficients of variation of 3% and 2%, respectively, and no significant differences (0.0 +/- 0.16 cm and 0.06 +/- 0.36 mm, respectively). The longitudinal IVUS images displayed the important vascular structures and improved the spatial insight in aneurysmal anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Intravascular ultrasound scanning results provided accurate and reproducible measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysm. The longitudinal reconstruction of IVUS images provided additional knowledge on the anatomy of the aneurysm and its proximal and distal neck.

Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography as an adjuvant to fluoroscopy during endovascular thoracic aortic repair

OBJECTIVES

To define the utility of intraoperative transeophageal echocardiography (TEE) during endovascular thoracic aortic repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

MATERIALS

Five patients underwent six transluminal endovascular stent-graft procedures for repair of thoracic aortic disease.

METHODS

After induction of anaesthesia, a multiplane or biplane TEE probe was placed to obtain views of the diseased aorta. Both transverse and longitudinal planes of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aortic segments were imaged. The aortic pathology was confirmed by TEE and the proximal and distal extents of the intrathoracic lesion were defined. Doppler and colour-flow imaging was used to identify flow patterns through the aorta before and after stent-graft deployment.

RESULTS

Visualisation and confirmation of the aortic pathology by ultrasonography was accomplished in all patients. TEE was able to confirm proper placement of the endograft relative to the aortic lesion after deployment and was able to confirm exclusion of blood flow into the aneurysm sacs.

CONCLUSIONS

TEE may facilitate repair by confirming aortic pathology, identifying endograft placement, assessment of the adequacy of aneurysm sack isolation, as well as dynamic intraoperative cardiac assessment.