Minimal incision abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

“Fast-Track” Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

The “open” repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) continues to evolve with incorporation of less invasive methods for surgical exposure and the use of patient care pathways for shorter hospital stays. In a consecutive series of 30 patients with infrarenal AAA, a “ fasttrack” hospital care pathway was implemented that included the following: AAA exposure via a limited (10–15 cm) retroperitoneal incision, use of self-retaining retractor and special vascular clamps/instruments, and prosthetic graft endoaneurysmorrhaphy. Excellent anatomic exposure for graft implantation was achieved with an average operative time of 175 minutes. Use of oral metoclopromide and patient-controlled epidural analgesia resulted in patient ambulation and oral diet on postoperative day 1. Average length of hospital stay was 3.6 days (range: 3–7 days), and no patient required readmission for AAA repair-related or gastrointestinal problems. One patient died (30-day mortality rate of 3.3%) caused by delayed recognition of a splenic injury, and 1 patient sustained an intraoperative ureter injury that was repaired and stented. Although stent-graft exclusion for AAA repair has become popular, the major advantages of endovascular therapy, such as shorter ICU and hospital stays, earlier dietary feeding, and reduction in postoperative morbidity, can also be achieved by using minimal incision exposure for AAA interposition grafting combined with traditional hand-sewn vascular anastomoses. “Fast-track” AAA repair is applicable to the majority of patients with infrarenal AAAs, and vascular surgeons can easily master the technique of “limited” incision retroperitoneal exposure. This approach avoids the concerns of endovascular stent-graft durability and the mandatory vascular imaging follow-up to identify endoleak development and AAA enlargement.

Mini-invasive aortic surgery: personal experience

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated our experience in minilaparotomy (MINI) and compared the results with conventional open repair (OPEN).

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2012, we surgically treated 234 consecutive patients with elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms, 195 men and 39 women, with a mean age of 74 years. Inclusion criteria for MINI were not ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, increased surgical risk, anatomical limits for endovascular repair, no previous surgical invasion of the abdominal cavity, and no requirement for concomitant abdominal surgical invasion. Surgical treatment was OPEN in 113 patients (48.3%) and MINI through an 8- to 14-cm incision in 121 patients (51.7%). Epidural anesthesia has been added in 26.5% and in 19.3% of the MINI and OPEN patients, respectively. Mortality, complications, aortic clamping time, operative time, need for postoperative morphine therapy, time to solid diet, and length of hospital stay were registered.

RESULTS

The MINI has been performed in all patients selected, with 72 aortoaortic grafts and 49 aortobisiliac grafts. Early mortality was 1.6% versus 3.5% (P > 0.5); 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality were 7% versus 9%, 19% versus 22%, and 29% versus 34% (P > 0.5); complications were 12.2% versus 26.6% (P > 0.05); mean (SD) clamping time was 48 (12) versus 44 (14) minutes (P > 0.5); mean (SD) operative time was 218.72 (41.95) versus 191.44 (21.73) minutes (P > 0.025); mean (SD) estimated intraoperative blood loss was 425.64 (85.95) versus 385.30 (72.41) mL (P > 0.1); mean (SD) morphine consumption in the group given epidural and the group not given epidural was 0 (2) and 2 (2) mg intravenously (IV) versus 2 (4) (P < 0.5) and 4 (3) mg IV (P > 0.1); mean (SD) ambulation was 2.1 (0.6) versus 4.1 (2.7) (P < 0.5); mean (SD) time to solid diet was 2.1 (0.4) versus 3.5 (1.6) (P < 0.5); and mean (SD) length of hospital stay was 4.9 (1.64) versus 7.35 (1.95) days (P > 0.05), in the MINI and OPEN groups, respectively. Postoperative hernia at 3 years was 18% versus 23% in the MINI and OPEN groups (P < 0.5), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MINI gives the patients a significantly shorter period of recovery with the quality and safety of the OPEN. This experience suggested extending the indication to all surgical candidates without local limitations.

An update on the 'fast-track' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Patients who have unfavourable anatomy for endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm require open repair. This is particularly the case for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms, or those patients with small or occluded iliac access vessels.An experience of 'fast-track' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair that was previously reported is updated in the present case. A retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is taken, using a small incision, and is followed by a patient care pathway protocol that demonstrated excellent results and a shortened length of stay. The present update on 56 patients is approximately double the previously reported experience.

Minilaparotomy abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of minimally invasive vascular surgery: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the early post-operative clinical impact of minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in comparison with the standard open repair.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted. Patients of groups A (19 patients) and B (18 patients) were treated with the MIAS technique and the standard open method, respectively.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the two groups in fluid resuscitation during the operation. Post-operatively, there were significant differences between groups A and B in the time until starting liquid diet (2 +/- 0.74 versus 3.55 +/- 0.85 post-operative days (PD), respectively; P < 0.05), the time until starting the solid diet (3.05 +/- 0.77 versus 5.11 +/- 0.75 PD, respectively; P < 0.05), the time of ambulation (2 +/- 0.74 versus 3.4 +/- 0.98 PD, respectively; P < 0.05) and in the hospital length of stay (4 +/- 0.81 versus 9.7 +/- 2.66 days, respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The MIAS technique, for repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms, is a safe and feasible procedure that combines the early advantages of endovascular repair with the long-term advantages of the traditional open repair.

Reduced access aortic exposure (RAAE) technique for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair

OBJECTIVE

A reduced access aortic exposure (RAAE) technique for repair of infrarenal AAA repair has been evaluated and the short-term surgical outcomes are compared with conventional open repair (OPEN).

METHODS

All consecutive patients having repair of infrarenal AAA over a period of 3 years were included in this study. A group of these patients had AAA repair using the RAAE technique with a small midline incision (<8 cm). Patient characteristics and peri-operative outcomes were compared with the other group treated with the traditional full-length midline incision (OPEN).

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent AAA repair in this study (38 in the RAAE group and 22 in the OPEN group). The age, sex distribution and co-morbidities were similar across the two groups (median age 76 and 75 years respectively). The RAAE group had a significantly shorter Intensive care stay (2 vs. 4 days, p=0.041) and a shorter total hospital stay (9 vs. 14 days, p=0.004). Significant postoperative chest infection was recorded in 13% (5/38) in the RAAE group as compared to 41% (9/21) in the OPEN group (p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The RAAE technique for infra renal AAA repair is feasible and safe, and allows quicker postoperative recovery with comparable morbidity and mortality to the conventional technique.

Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Early and middle-term results of a consecutive series of 122 cases

BACKGROUND

Endoaneurysmorrhaphy with intraluminal graft placement, described by Creech, is the gold standard for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Endovascular aneurysm repair has gained popularity for its minimal invasiveness and satisfying short-term results, but there are still many concerns about the long-term success of the procedure. Since 1998, laparoscopic surgery has been proposed for AAA treatment. The potential benefits of a minimally invasive procedure reproducing the endoaneurysmorrhaphy results over time have been advocated. In our experience, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been routinely used for the open-surgery transperitoneal/retroperitoneal approach and for endovascular aneurysm repair. After 4 years, we are able to define the early and middle-term results of such laparoscopic-assisted treatment.

METHODS

From October 2000 to March 2004, 604 consecutive nonurgent AAAs were treated at our institution. Of these, 122 (20.2%) were treated by HALS. Exclusion criteria for HALS were hostile abdomen (previous major abdominal or aortic surgery), bilateral diffuse common iliac and/or hypogastric aneurysms, massive aortoiliac calcifications, and severe cardiac (ejection fraction <35%) and respiratory (P(O2) <60 mm Hg or carbon dioxide >50 mm Hg) insufficiency. Juxtarenal and proximal iliac aneurysms were not a contraindication, nor was obesity. In all patients, we performed a minilaparotomy (7-8 cm) both for laparoscopic hand-assisted dissection and for endoaneurysmorrhaphy. All perioperative data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up consisted of ultrasonography and clinical evaluation after 6 and 12 months and then every year after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean laparoscopic and total operative times were respectively 64 +/- 32 minutes and 257 +/- 70 minutes, the mean aortic cross-clamping time was 76 +/- 26 minutes, and the mean autotransfused blood volume was 1136 +/- 711 mL. The overall mortality and morbidity were respectively 0% and 12.2%. Morbidity was surgery related in only two cases (bleeding from an ipogastric artery lesion and a leg graft thrombosis). The mean intensive care unit stay was 14.3 +/- 13 hours. Oral food intake was resumed after 27.4 +/- 15 hours, and patients were discharged after a mean of 4.4 +/- 1.7 days. Operative times were not affected by obesity, suprarenal aortic cross-clamping, or aneurysm size. Both concomitant iliac aneurysms and bifurcated graft implantation (related to longer vascular reconstruction) involved significantly longer operative times. The learning curve of the procedure (comparing the first 30 patients with the last 92 patients) led to significantly shorter endoscopic, cross-clamping, and total operative times (P = .000). The mean follow-up was 28.6 +/- 16 months. Three incisional hernias and one case of bowel occlusion were detected. All these cases (3.4%) required laparoscopic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The HALS technique is a safe and minimally invasive treatment for AAA; it is useful for limiting the need for conventional open surgery and reducing the length of hospital stay. Despite the lack of randomized studies, HALS seems to be associated with a better postoperative course than standard open surgery. HALS can also be considered as an equivalent of a well-established procedure and as a bridge between open and total laparoscopic surgery.

Evidence for early nasogastric tube removal after infrarenal aortic surgery: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression after abdominal surgery is still largely used to prevent nausea and vomiting. However, indications are based more on practice than on studies. Moreover, prolonged NGT decompression can lead to complications. In this prospective and randomized study, we evaluated the effects of early withdrawal of NGTs in patients undergoing surgery of the infrarenal aorta.

METHODS

Between October 2001 and May 2002, consecutive patients underwent scheduled infrarenal aortic operations. Patients were prospectively randomised into two groups: group 1, NGT maintenance until the passage of flatus; and group 2, NGT removal at the time of tracheal extubation. Preoperative and perioperative data were collected. The main end point was the occurrence of nausea and vomiting. Secondary end points were tolerance of NGT withdrawal and postoperative complications. Criteria were compared between groups by using Mann-Whitney or Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients underwent aortic operations. Six patients were subsequently excluded from the study. Of the 40 randomized subjects, 20 patients were included in each group. Preoperative and intraoperative data were similar in both groups. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding nausea and vomiting. In group 1, the occurrence of respiratory complications was more frequent compared with group 2 (5 vs 0 complications; P = .023). There was no significant difference in intensive care unit stay, but the hospital stay was shorter in group 2 (mean, 9 +/- 3 days vs 15 +/- 9 days; P = .016). There were no differences in other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not support a significant effect of early removal of NGTs on nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing open repair of the infrarenal aorta. However, these findings suggest that NGT maintenance increases the risk of respiratory complications and the length of hospital stay.

Minilaparotomy for Aortoiliac Aneurysmal Disease

Vascular surgery is evolving, as other specialities, toward minimally invasive techniques. Presently, 3 approaches to aortoiliac disease are suggested as minimally invasive. Besides the endovascular procedures, laparoscopic techniques and minilaparotomy are being advocated. Although for aneurysmal disease, we favor a totally laparoscopic approach, criticisms raised over laparoscopy-assisted techniques by those advocating minilaparotomy led us to investigate the benefits of the latter technique. We first evaluated the procedure in 7 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). We found the procedure impossible to perform with an 8- to 10-cm incision in 6 of the 7 patients. This led us to evaluate causes of failure of the technique. It appeared to us that most of our complications were related to inadequate exposure. Fifty consecutive computed tomography scans from patients with AAA of surgical size were then reviewed to evaluate the aneurysm lengths and compare them to the reported lengths of skin incision for minilaparotomy. Results were expressed adding a total of 2 cm for proximal and distal clamping. Only 2% of patients would present with aneurysms suitable for treatment through an 8-cm midline incision and 30% through a 10-cm incision. We then reviewed the literature on minilaparotomy. We believe that minilaparotomy should be reserved for those patients with purely aortic disease and the appropriate body habitus.

Treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm by minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach: use of a video-assisted technique

We propose a technique for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm in which first a minilaparotomy (retroperitoneal) is performed to make a conventional arterial dissection; then, video assistance is used to control the left lumbar arteries and to make the aortic anastomosis. This technique can be performed with no significant laparoscopic capability.The patient was installed in a 20-degree right lateral decubitus. A transverse left 8- to 10-cm abdominal incision was made, followed by separation of the muscular structures. Retroperitoneal control of the proximal aortic neck and of both common iliac arteries was obtained by digital and instrumental dissection. A 30-degree laparoscope was then introduced through a 8- to 12-mm trocar and provided the light and magnification that facilitated the dissection of the posterior wall of the aortic neck and of the left flank of the aneurysm, looking for the lumbar arteries to be clipped. A suspended running suture to make the aorto-prosthetic anastomosis was facilitated by the magnification of the camera, especially during the passage of needles. Between March and September 2001, 32 patients fulfilled the anatomic conditions: an infrarenal aortic neck length of 2 cm or more, absence of hypogastric artery aneurysm, and no need for inferior mesenteric artery reimplantation. In 30 patients, the surgery was performed by using the planned minimally invasive approach, and extension of the incision was necessary in two patients.

Minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of infrarenal aortic disease

PURPOSE

In order to decrease complications and improve postoperative recovery, we have developed a minimally invasive retroperitoneal approach (MIRPA) for the treatment of infrarenal aortic disease. This study was carried out to define the limitations and applicability of this technique in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).

METHODS

From November 2000 to February 2004, 150 patients with AAA (n = 130) or AIOD (n = 20) were prospectively included in the study. The procedure consisted in a standard aneurysmorrhaphy or bypass procedure performed through a video assisted left minilombotomy.The main outcomes measured were mortality, complications, operative time, aortic cross-clamp time, time to solid diet, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 0.7 %. Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients (8%). Conversion to a standard procedure was necessary in 3 patients. Mean operative time was 207 +/- 57 minutes (AAA) and 224 +/- 55 minutes (AIOD). Mean aortic cross-clamp time was 76 +/- 26 minutes (AAA) and 48 +/- 21 minutes (AIOD). Median resumption of regular diet was 2 days. Median length of stay in the intensive care unit was 1 day and in the hospital 8 days.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that MIRPA is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure in the treatment of infrarenal aortic disease.

Predictors of Early Discharge following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have lower perioperative morbidity and leave the hospital earlier than patients undergoing open repair. However, potential complications require continuous surveillance of endografts and there are few data regarding their long-term fate. If an open operation were well tolerated, this might be a preferable alternative. The purpose of this study was to identify patients with lower morbidity and shorter hospital stay following open AAA repair and to analyze factors that might point to open repair as the preferred approach. We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent AAA repair between 1995 and 2000 at our institution. All patients with ruptured aneurysms and those that required renal, celiac, or superior mesenteric reconstructions during the AAA repair were excluded. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbid conditions, intraoperative data, and postoperative complications were analyzed in detail. A total of 115 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was only one perioperative death (0.9%). The mean hospital stay was 8.1 days. A history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and longer operative time were independent factors associated with prolonged hospital stay. Forty-one patients (35.6%) left the hospital in 5 or less days. Compared to the group with hospital stay >5 days, these patients had a lower incidence of COPD (7.3% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.05) and smaller-size AAAs (5.6 vs. 6.4 cm, p < 0.0001), and were more often operated on via a retroperitoneal approach (61% vs. 40.5%, p < 0.05). Their time in the operating room was less (3.5 vs. 4.5 hr, p < 0.0001), and they had less estimated blood loss (750 vs. 1500 cc, p < 0.001) and fewer transfusions (0.95 vs. 2.45 units, p < 0.0001). Patients without COPD and smaller AAAs that can be repaired via a retroperitoneal approach have a lower incidence of perioperative complications and a shorter hospital stay following open AAA repair. Until long-term results for endografts are available, our data suggest that these patients are well served with an open repair.

Comparison of minimal incision aortic surgery with endovascular aortic repair

BACKGROUND

Enthusiasm for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has been tempered by midterm outcomes that raise valid concern about long-term durability.

METHODS

This article compares outcome data from a prospective nonrandomized comparison of a less-invasive open surgical repair technique-minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS)-and EVAR.

RESULTS

MIAS and EVAR had comparable intensive care unit stays (1 day or less), quick return to general dietary feeding (2 days), and comparable hospital length of stay (4.8 days [3.4 days for uncomplicated cases MIAS] and 2.0 days for EVAR). Overall morbidity and mortality for MIAS and EVAR were comparable (18% versus 27%). MIAS was more cost effective than EVAR (net revenue MIAS = +8,445 US dollars, EVAR -7,263 US dollars).

CONCLUSIONS

MIAS is a safe, cost-effective alternative to endovascular aortic repair.

Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm endoaneurysmorraphy: early and mid-term results

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to evaluate the consequences on patient selection and on early and mid-term results during the learning curve of a surgical team performing laparoscopy-assisted surgery to treat abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1998 and January 2002, 24 patients (22 men, 2 women; mean age, 68.2 years [range, 57-82 years]) were included in a prospective study and underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal AAA dissection followed by graft implantation through a 6 to 9 cm minilaparotomy. Perioperative data for the first 10 patients, obtained during the first 25 months of the study (group 1), were compared with data for the last 14 patients, obtained during the last 13 months of the study (group 2). Follow-up consisted of clinical examination or duplex scanning, or both, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter, and computed tomographic scanning before discharge and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

One patient (4.3%) died in the immediate postoperative period. In this patient and two others (12.5%), the minilaparotomy was extended intraoperatively, from 12 cm to 16 cm. With experience, initial contraindications such as obesity and short proximal or calcified aortic neck were eliminated, enabling increase in rate of patients included, from 27.7% during the first 25 first months to 56% during the last 13 months (P =.063). Mean duration of operative clamping decreased from 275 minutes in group 1 to 195 minutes in group 2 (P <.0001), and mean duration of aortic clamping decreased from 101 minutes in group 1 to 52 minutes in group 2 (P <.0001). The number of early repeat interventions was reduced from 3 (30%) in group 1 to 2 (14.3%) in group 2 (P =.61), and clinical recovery period decreased from 6.8 days to 4.3 days (P <.005). During mean follow-up of 17.1 months (range, 3-38 months), no late aortoiliac procedures were necessary and no prosthetic abnormality was detected.

CONCLUSION

This minimally invasive video-assisted technique provides good postoperative comfort and excellent mid-term results. Developments in experience and instrumentation have enabled us to include a growing number of patients and to reduce the duration of the procedure.

Can minilaparotomy abdominal aortic aneurysm repair be performed safely and effectively without special skills?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine whether a surgeon without special skills can perform minimal incision abdominal aortic aneurysm repair as safely and effectively as traditional retroperitoneal aneurysmectomy.

METHODS

After informed consent, eligible patients were randomized into minilaparotomy and retroperitoneal groups. The minilaparotomy repair consisted of a short transabdominal midline incision, intraabdominal retraction of the bowel, control of back bleeding with balloon catheters, and hand-sewn anastomoses. The retroperitoneal approach was performed through a left vertical-lateral abdominal incision.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were randomly treated by minilaparotomy approach (n = 14) or retroperitoneal approach (n = 12) from December, 1999, to May 2001. Parameters for speed of recovery were indistinguishable and of no clinical significance. In the long-term follow-up (mean period, 27 months), no patients in the minilaparatomy group complained of discomfort from the incision, whereas 4 patients in the retroperitoneal group complained of discomfort (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Minilaparotomy approach can be performed safely and effectively without specialized skill. With regard to wound discomfort, the minilaparotomy technique is excellent. The minilaparotomy approach is therefore a useful alternative to traditional repair.

Minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS)

This study evaluates the clinical and economic impact of using less extensive minimal invasive aortic surgery (MIAS) for elective treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) in two independent surgical departments. Surgeons from two institutions conducted a prospective consecutive, nonrandomized analysis of MIAS electively performed in 80 patients. MIAS outcomes were compared with 80 consecutive elective standard open aortic procedures (40 from each institution), which were performed during the same time period. Cost analyses for MIAS and standard open repair were performed at each institution. Our results indicated that MIAS is as safe as standard open repair, is more cost-effective, and has significantly shorter hospital stays than with standard open repair.

[Laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery for occlusive disease and or aneurysms]

The techniques of video-assisted surgery have been recently applied to aortoiliac surgery. The choices between first the retroperitoneal approach or the transperitoneal approach and the place of video-assisted surgery in relation to totally laparoscopic surgery are at the centre of debates. The aim of this clarification is to relate the evolution of laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery for occlusive disease and aneurysms through a review of the literature on this subject.

Minimally invasive vascular surgery for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm with iliac involvement

PURPOSE

A minimally invasive vascular surgery (MIVS) technique for repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with iliac involvement was evaluated, and its outcome was compared with conventional open repair.

METHODS

Twenty patients with AAA with iliac involvement underwent treatment with bifurcated graft replacement with the MIVS technique. The procedure was performed via minilaparotomy, with the incision length determined according to the extent of the AAA obtained with ultrasound scanning and with the small intestine confined completely within the abdominal cavity. The proximal and distal operating fields were obtained with changing the patient position and arranging for the abdominal incision to be retracted cephalad and caudad. Perioperative courses in these 20 patients (the MIVS group) were analyzed in comparison with 14 patients who underwent conventional open repair, which was performed through the full midline laparotomy with the intestine simply covered with moistened towels (the conventional group).

RESULTS

The MIVS technique for AAA repair was performed with a mean abdominal incision length of 8.4 cm and a range from 6.5 to 11.2 cm. The patients in the MIVS group showed earlier resumption of oral intake and ambulation in comparison with those patients in the conventional group (liquid diet: 1.1 +/- 0.3 days versus 2.9 +/- 1.4 days; P <.01; solid diet: 2.0 +/- 0.2 days versus 3.9 +/- 1.4 days; P <.01; ambulation: 2.1 +/- 0.8 days versus 4.3 +/- 2.3 days; P <.01), with comparable mortality and morbidity rates. Accordingly, the patients in the MIVS group were discharged earlier (20.7 +/- 6.3 days versus 33.9 +/- 12.6 days; P <.01), and total hospitalization charges were significantly decreased (2,232,791 +/- 200,747 Japanese yen versus 2,640,441 +/- 243,889 Japanese yen; P <.01).

CONCLUSION

The MIVS technique allowed earlier postoperative recovery with comparable morbidity and mortality rates with the conventional technique and, therefore, saved hospital stay length and total hospitalization charges. Thus, the MIVS technique is considered as a new and effective minimally invasive technique for open AAA repair.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Newer, minimally invasive catheter-based endovascular technology utilizing stent grafts are currently being evaluated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. A retrospective review of all (3 years) consecutive, non-ruptured elective AAA repairs was undertaken to document the results of AAA surgical repair in a modern cohort of patients to allow a contemporary comparison with the evolving endoluminal data. One hundred twenty-one AAAs were identified in a male veteran population. Mean age was 68.5 +/-7.7 years. Medical history review showed hypertension in 55%, heart disease in 73.5%, peripheral vascular disease in 21%, stroke and transient ischemic attacks in 22%, diabetes mellitus in 7%, renal insufficiency in 10%, and smoking history in 80%. The AAA size was documented with ultrasound (5.2 +/-1.3 cm, n=40) and computed tomography (5.6 +/-1.3 cm, n=100). Fifty-nine percent had angiography. Intraoperative end points included an operative time of 165 +/-6.3 minutes from incision to dressing placement. A Dacron tube graft was used in 78%, the remaining were Dacron bifurcated grafts. A suprarenal clamp was used in 8% for proximal aortic control with juxtarenal aneurysms. A pulmonary-artery catheter was placed in 69%. A transverse incision was used in 69% of patients and a midline incision was used in the rest. Estimated blood loss was 1505 +/-103 mL; cell saver blood returned 754 +/-53 mL; crystalloid/Hespan 4771 +/-176 mL; banked packed red blood cells 0.75 +/-0.11 U. Time to extubation was, in the operating room (78.5%), on the day of the operation (5.0%), postoperative day (POD) 1 (12.4%), POD2 (1.7%), POD3 (0.8%), and one case was performed with epidural anesthesia only. Postoperative end points included a 30-day mortality rate of 1.6% (two patients). Postoperative morbidity included wound dehiscence 0.8%; sepsis, urinary tract infection, wound infection, leg ischemia, ischemic colitis, and stroke each had an incidence of 1.6%; myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, re-operation for suspected bleeding, and ileus or bowel obstruction occurred with an incidence of 3.3%. No significant increase in serum creatinine levels was noted. Time to enteral fluids/nutrition was 3.5 +/-0.08 days. Patients were out of bed to a chair or walking by 1.3 +/-0.06 days postoperatively. The length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 2.0 +/-0.12 days and postoperative hospital stay was 6.6 +/- 0.33 days. Transfusion requirement for the hospital stay was 1.6 +/-0.2 U per patient. This review highlights a cohort of male veteran patients with significant cardiac co-morbidity who have undergone repair with a conventional open technique and low mortality and morbidity rates. This group had rapid extubation, time to oral intake, and ambulation. In addition, ICU and hospital stays were relatively short.

Laparoscopy-assisted aneurysm resection as a minimal invasive alternative in patients unsuitable for endovascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

So far, endovascular surgery has been the only minimal invasive way to treat patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). With hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), laparoscopic transperitoneal endoaneurysm repair can be performed through a 6-cm mini-incision only. We wanted to evaluate whether this laparoscopic technique can be offered as a minimal invasive alternative in patients unsuitable for endovascular AAA repair.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty patients were referred for endovascular AAA repair. Three patients had to be excluded from the study. Endovascular AAA exclusion was finally performed in 13 patients. Laparoscopic AAA resection was performed in 24 patients. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery with transperitoneal access and endoaneurysm repair was accomplished in all patients unsuitable for an endovascular procedure. The outcome after endovascular repair was compared with the outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopy.

RESULTS

In the laparoscopic group, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in one case. One patient in this group died (4.1%) postoperatively. There were four complications in each group. In the endovascular group we had one endoleak type II and one graft thrombosis, which required a reoperation. After endovascular treatment, patients were transferred significantly less frequently to the intensive care unit, and they could resume oral feeding earlier. Mobilization and postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic AAA resection with the use of the technique described can be routinely offered to patients unsuitable for endovascular AAA exclusion with excellent long-term results similar to open surgery. A controlled study is clearly indicated to evaluate the role of laparoscopic techniques in aneurysm surgery.

Minimal incision aortic surgery

PURPOSE

In this study we evaluated the clinical and economic impact of minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) for treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

METHOD

Fifty patients with either AAA (34) or AIOD (16), prospectively treated with the MIAS technique, were compared with 50 patients (40 AAA and 10 AIOD) treated in the same time period with long midline incision and extracavitary small bowel retraction. MIAS was also compared with a cohort of 32 patients with AAA treated by means of endoaortic stent-grafts. Outcomes and cost (based on metric mean length of stay) were compared for the open and endoaortic techniques.

RESULTS

Patients who experienced no perioperative complications after the MIAS or endovascular repair technique had shorter hospital stays than patients with uncomplicated aortic repairs performed with a traditional long midline abdominal incision (3 days vs 3 days vs. 7.2 days). Hospital stay was also significantly shorter for the less invasive procedures when perioperative complications were included (4.8 days vs. 4.3 days vs 9.3 days). The MIAS and endovascular aortic repair groups had a shorter intensive care unit stay (< or = 1.0 day) and a quicker return to general dietary feeding (2.5 days) than patients treated with standard open repair (1.8 days, 4.7 days). The overall morbidity for the MIAS technique (14%) and endovascular technique (21%) was not significantly different from standard open repair (24%). The mortality rate for the different treatment groups was equivalent (MIAS, 2%; endovascular repair, 3%; standard repair, 2%). The MIAS was more cost-efficient than standard open repair ($12,585 vs $18,445) because of shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay and was more cost-efficient than endoaortic repair ($12,585 vs $32,040) because of reduced, direct intraoperative costs.

CONCLUSIONS

MIAS is as safe as standard open or endovascular repair in the treatment of AAA and AIOD. MIAS is more cost-efficient than standard open or endoaortic repair.

Laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery for aneurysm and occlusive disease: when should a minilaparotomy be performed?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefits and the indications of performing a minilaparotomy during laparoscopic abdominal aortoiliac reconstructions.

METHODS

This prospective study was approved by the Commission Consultative de Protection des Personnes dans la Recherche Biomédicale of the University of Marseilles, and all patients gave their informed consent. Between January 1998 and March 2000, 27 patients (23 men; 4 women) with a mean age of 58.2 years (range, 42-76 years) underwent aortoaortic (n = 3), aortounifemoral (n = 4), or aortobifemoral (n = 20) bypass graft for aortoiliac occlusive disease (n = 20), emboligenic aortitis (n = 1), or abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (n = 6). At the beginning of the trial, the decision was made to perform an intraoperative conversion to open surgery in case of bleeding (group 0), when a totally laparoscopic procedure was possible (group I), or when a 6- to 8-cm supraumbilical minilaparotomy was needed in case of technical difficulty (group II). In each case of AAA, the remaining lumbar arteries were controlled (group III); and for the last six patients of this series (group IV), a minilaparotomy was systematically performed.

RESULTS

One patient was admitted with multiple organ failure and died on day 12 (3.7%) with a patent graft. One intraoperative conversion to open surgery (3.7%, group 0) was performed for bleeding; recovery was uneventful. Seven postoperative surgical procedures (26%) were necessary, including two cases of aortic bleeding because of hypertensive access. Seven procedures were totally laparoscopic (group I), and a minilaparotomy was performed in the other 19 cases, including seven cases of technical difficulty (group II). The mean operative and clamping times and the mean postoperative hospital stay were globally (P =.021) and individually (P < or =.016) significantly shorter in group IV when compared with those of the other three groups. Twenty patients (74%) had a postoperative hospital stay of 6 days or less (3-6 days), with minimal complaints of pain, tolerance of oral feeding on day 2, and mobilization on day 2 or 3. All bypass grafts remained patent after a mean follow-up of 11 months (1-26 months).

CONCLUSION

With regard to the instrumentation presently available, this study shows the benefit of a minilaparotomy when performing a laparoscopic aortoaortic or aortofemoral bypass graft for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease and AAA.

A less-invasive minilaparotomy technique for repair of aortic aneurysm and occlusive disease

A minimally invasive surgical technique for repair of aortic aneurysms and aortoiliac occlusive disease was studied. A small periumbilical incision, nondisplacement of the small bowel outside the abdominal cavity, and hand-sewn anastomoses are performed without laparoscopic assistance. This technique may reduce the duration of hospital stay.

Totally laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) resection is a major surgical procedure performed frequently. As a minimal access procedure, laparoscopy has been shown in the field of general surgery to improve a patient's postoperative well-being and to shorten hospital stay. The same benefits could be expected from a laparoscopic approach for AAA repair. We report what we believe to be the first totally laparoscopic AAA repair performed according to the principles of endoaneurysmorrhaphy.

Less invasive aortic surgery: the minilaparotomy technique

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated a less invasive technique for exposure of the infrarenal aorta and its impact on the treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) or aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), or both.

METHODS

Forty patients with AAA (26), aneurysmal extension into the iliac arteries (6), or AIOD (8) were prospectively selected for minilaparotomy aortic exposure and repair using a small periumbilical midline incision (< or =10 cm); intra-abdominal, nondisplaced retraction of the small bowel; and conventional hand-sewn vascular anastomoses. Perioperative comparisons with a contemporary group of AAA patients treated with long, open midline incision and extracavitary small bowel retraction were made.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the minilaparotomy and open surgical control groups for operating room time; intraoperative, perioperative morbidity; or mortality. Significant differences were documented between the minilaparotomy and the control group with regard to stay in the intensive care unit (days; 1.0+/-1.2 versus 1.8+/-1.5); return to general diet (days; 3+/-1.3 versus 4.7+/-2.8); and length of stay (days; 4.9+/-1.8 versus 7.3+/- 3.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Minilaparotomy exposure is safe and effective for treatment of infrarenal AAA and AIOD. This technique maintains quality outcome while reducing postoperative ileus, hospital stay, and resource utilization.