Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ

Mouse Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Classification, Advancement, and Application

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the subtype of liver cancer with the highest incidence, which is a heterogeneous malignancy with increasing incidence rate and high mortality. For ethical reasons, it is essential to validate medical clinical trials for HCC in animal models before further consideration on humans. Therefore, appropriate models for the study of the pathogenesis of the disease and related treatment methods are necessary. For tumor research, mouse models are the most commonly used and effective in vivo model, which is closer to the real-life environment, and the repeated experiments performed on it are closer to the real situation. Several mouse models of HCC have been developed with different mouse strains, cell lines, tumor sites, and tumor formation methods. In this review, we mainly introduce some mouse HCC models, including induced model, gene-edited model, HCC transplantation model, and other mouse HCC models, and discuss how to choose the appropriate model according to the purpose of the experiments.

Pattern of local recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Background

This study aimed to describe the locations of local recurrences based on the mastectomy and reconstruction type in breast cancer patients.

Methods

In November 2020, a systematic literature review was performed through MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Centre Register of Controlled Trials. Publications that included skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction and described the location of local recurrences were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included salvage or prophylactic mastectomy, unclear distinction between local and regional recurrences, rare tumor types.

Results

From 19 publications, 272 local recurrences lesions were reported in a total of 4,787 patients. After autologous reconstruction (n=2,465), local recurrences were located in the skin in 45 (1.8%) patients, in the chest wall in 18 (0.7%), and in the nipple-areolar complex in 9 (0.4%). After implant reconstruction (n=1,917), local recurrences sites included the skin in 91 (4.7%) patients, chest wall in 8 (0.4%), and nipple-areolar complex in 8 (0.4%). Of the 70 lesions with reported in-breast location, 57 (81.4%) relapsed in the original tumor location.

Discussion

Although meta-analysis was not conducted, present analysis demonstrated that most local recurrences after skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy occurred within the skin or subcutaneous tissues. It was found that the original tumor location was the most frequent site of relapse. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the original tumor overlying the skin while planning postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Radiation delivery in patients undergoing therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines exist for radiation delivery in the setting of mastectomy or breast-conservation therapy, radiation delivery after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) remains variable. Our goal is to determine whether patients who undergo therapeutic NSM are more likely to receive radiation than patients who undergo non-NSM and whether National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for radiation after mastectomy are observed in NSM patients.

METHODS

Female patients who underwent NSM or non-NSM for breast cancer from 2006 to 2010 were isolated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Univariate analysis stratified by tumor size and lymph node status, and multivariate analyses were used to compare odds of radiation in NSM and mastectomy patients. Adherence to NCCN guidelines based on tumor size and lymph node status was also investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 112,817 patients were included: 470 (0.4 %) underwent NSM, and 112,347 (99.6 %) underwent non-NSM. NSM patients with 0 nodes/size ≤2 cm, 0 nodes/size 2-5 cm, and unexamined axilla/size ≤2 cm had higher odds of radiation when compared with size- and node-matched mastectomy patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed that NSM patients had higher odds of radiation (odds ratio 2.01, p < 0.001) than mastectomy patients. Radiation was given to 18 % of NSM patients who did not meet NCCN guidelines according to size or lymph node involvement, compared with 6 % of mastectomy patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo therapeutic NSM are more likely to receive radiation compared with mastectomy patients. This may reflect a concern with leaving ductal tissue in the nipple-areolar complex.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy: considerations and techniques

SUMMARY Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is the next step in the natural progression of tissue preservation breast cancer surgery. NSM selection criteria are a balance between oncologic and cosmetic considerations; accurate ascertainment of nipple involvement is critical. Further selection should be based on patients with the greatest likelihood of viable flaps and the ability to maintain symmetrical breasts. Surgical technique focuses on incision selection and creating thin flaps with removal of the majority of breast tissue. Risk assessment for long-term recurrence is necessary with proponents for pre-, intra- and post-operative assessment. Prospective studies show low rates of local recurrence of the nipple–areolar complex and are comparable to skin-sparing mastectomy with short-term follow-up in highly select groups of patients. Extended follow-up will be helpful in determining long-term outcomes. Nipple necrosis is an outcome that should be considered. Studies may support improved quality of life and patient satisfaction with NSM, and it is likely to be a safe and feasible procedure that may benefit carefully selected patients.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a surgical protocol designed to reduce the disabling psychological effects of radical or skin-sparing mastectomy. The preservation of the nipple-areola complex produces a more-natural result of the breast reconstruction, but this preservation is suspected of increasing tumor local recurrence. To reduce this risk, different approaches have been proposed: restrict the inclusion criteria and/or add localized radiation therapy. The local recurrence rate in recent series of patients receiving NSM is comparable with the local recurrence rate in modified radical or skin-sparing mastectomies. Today, the quality of the subcutaneous mastectomy technique allows for a more radical glandular removal, especially in the retroareolar area; therefore, local recurrence is observed in 3-6% of patients at 5 years, consistent with traditional mastectomy.

Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Psychological effects of mastectomy for women with breast cancer have driven treatments that optimize cosmesis while strictly adhering to oncologic principles. Although skin-sparing mastectomy is oncologically safe, questions remain regarding the use of nipple-areola complex (NAC)-sparing mastectomy (NSM). We prospectively evaluated NSM for patients undergoing mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer or risk reduction.

METHODS

We enrolled 33 early-stage breast cancer and high-risk patient; 54 NSMs were performed. NAC viability and surgical complications were evaluated. Intraoperative and postoperative pathologic assessments of the NAC base tissue were performed. NAC sensory, cosmetic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one bilateral and 12 unilateral NSMs were performed in 33 patients, 37 (68.5%) for prophylaxis and 17 (31.5%) for malignancy. Mean age was 45.4 years. Complications occurred in 16 NACs (29.6%) and 6 skin flaps (11.1%). Operative intervention for necrosis resulted in 4 NAC removals (7.4%). Two (11.8%) of the 17 breasts with cancer had ductal carcinoma-in-situ at the NAC margin, necessitating removal at mastectomy. All evaluable patients had nipple erection at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Cosmetic outcome, evaluated by two plastic surgeons, was acceptable in 73.0% of breasts and 55.8% of NACs, but lateral displacement occurred in most cases. QOL assessment indicated patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

NSM is technically feasible in select patients, with a low risk for NAC removal resulting from necrosis or intraoperative detection of cancer, and preserves sensation and QOL. Thorough pathologic assessment of the NAC base is critical to ensure disease eradication.

Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction [outcomes article]

BACKGROUND

The goal of reconstruction after mastectomy is to provide a long-term and symmetric reconstruction. Providing symmetry entails different decision making when faced with a unilateral or bilateral reconstruction. In unilateral reconstruction, the goal is to match the contralateral breast; however, in bilateral reconstruction, symmetry between the reconstructed breasts is more important. The purpose of this study was to examine patient satisfaction between unilateral and bilateral reconstruction.

METHODS

All women at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center undergoing breast reconstruction between 1999 and 2006 were identified. Patient demographics and complications were collected. A survey was administered examining general and aesthetic satisfaction. Patients with unilateral reconstruction were identified and compared with patients with bilateral reconstruction. Additional analysis was performed based on the type of reconstruction, including autologous, autologous with implant, and tissue expander/implant-based reconstruction.

RESULTS

Overall, 702 women underwent 910 breast reconstructions (494 unilateral, 416 bilateral). Patients in the bilateral reconstruction group were more likely to have prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Complication rates were similar between unilateral and bilateral reconstruction. Patient satisfaction was highest in unilateral patients with autologous compared with implant reconstruction (general satisfaction, 73.9 versus 40.9 percent, p < 0.0001; aesthetic satisfaction, 72.3 versus 43.2 percent, p < 0.0001). Bilateral reconstruction had similar general and aesthetic satisfaction scores across autologous, autologous with implant, and implant-based reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing unilateral reconstruction have the highest satisfaction with autologous reconstruction. As symmetry between reconstructed breasts is essential for patient satisfaction in bilateral reconstruction, it is important to use the same type of reconstruction, whether autologous or implant-based.

Endoscopic breast surgery: where are we now and what might the future hold for video-assisted breast surgery?

Endoscopic surgery has been extensively used for many surgical conditions and has gained acceptance as an alternative and less invasive approach to open surgery. However, minimal access endoscopic techniques have yet to be translated into mainstream clinical practice in breast surgery. More recently, technical innovations have made it feasible to conduct endoscopic breast cancer resection, with or without breast reconstruction, through wounds inconspicuously hidden in the axilla and periareolar region. Several clinical trials have now been conducted to demonstrate technical feasibility, assess safety and provide follow up data regarding oncological success of endoscopic breast surgery. This primary aim was to critically evaluate the literature in order to determine the oncological and cosmetic efficacy of endoscopic breast surgery. A systematic review was conducted using Medline, Ovid and Embase to identify original data from studies of endoscopic breast surgery. Initial results have demonstrated that endoscopic breast surgery is safe and technically feasible. Early data suggests that it is possible to achieve disease control with high rates of overall survival and low rates of local relapse recurrence and/or distant metastases. However, the absence of level I randomised clinical evidence currently precludes a recommendation that endoscopic breast cancer surgery is capable of achieving equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy

Background

Although effective local control is the primary goal of surgery for breast cancer, the long-term aesthetic outcome is also important. Nipple-sparing mastectomy aims to address this, but there is no consensus on its clinical application. Evidence relating to oncological safety, surgical technique and early data on aesthetic outcome was reviewed.

Methods

The review was based on a PubMed search using the terms ‘nipple-sparing’ or ‘subcutaneous mastectomy’ and ‘breast cancer’.

Results

Large pathological studies report occult nipple involvement with cancer in 5·6–31 per cent, reflecting variation in inclusion criteria. Recent clinical series with careful patient selection report local recurrence in less than 5 per cent of patients. The incidence of cancer in the retained nipple after risk-reducing mastectomy is less than 1 per cent. Nipple necrosis rates range up to 8 and 16 per cent for total and partial necrosis respectively. Variations in outcome result from differences in extent of resection, placement of incisions and type of breast reconstruction.

Conclusion

Nipple-sparing mastectomy is an acceptable technique for women undergoing risk-reducing mastectomy. In the therapeutic setting, it may be offered to patients with smaller tumours far from the nipple and favourable pathological features. Women should be counselled about nipple necrosis and the potential for local recurrence.

Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate both clinical outcomes and satisfaction in patients who have undergone prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective analysis of the senior author's (S.L.S.) experience with breast reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy was performed. Timing, type of mastectomy and reconstruction, complications, and cancer occurrence/recurrence were examined. Patients reported their level of satisfaction and willingness to undergo the procedure again. Aesthetic outcomes were graded by an independent and blinded group of surgeons.

RESULTS

There were 101 breast reconstructions performed in 74 patients following prophylactic mastectomy. With a mean follow-up of 31 months, there were three breast-site complications in this group (3 percent). Forty-seven patients in the study had a unilateral prophylactic mastectomy; on the contralateral side with cancer, there were five breast-site complications in reconstructions following therapeutic mastectomy (10 percent). Aesthetic outcome ratings by surgeons were higher in the bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction patients compared with the cancer patients who had undergone a therapeutic mastectomy and reconstruction along with a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Patient satisfaction was higher in the bilateral prophylactic group, with all of the patients completing the survey stating they would undergo the procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast reconstruction following prophylactic mastectomy was as safe as or more safe than that following therapeutic mastectomy, which has been shown in other studies to result in a high percentage of patient satisfaction. Although not statistically significant, the results from reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy trended toward improved aesthetic outcome with a lower complication rate compared with reconstruction after therapeutic mastectomy.

The predominant role of surgery in the prevention and new trends in the surgical treatment of women with BRCA1/2 mutations

BACKGROUND

Advances in understanding molecular and genetic mechanisms underlying cancer promise an "individualized" management of the disease. Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germ-line mutation are at very high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Because high-quality data are lacking from randomized trials, prevention strategies and treatment of patients with BRCA-associated breast cancer are complex.

METHODS

The data for this review were obtained by searching PubMed and Medline for articles about optimizing prevention and treating women with familial susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer.

RESULTS

Prophylactic surgery is the rational approach for women who carry the BRCA mutation; chemoprevention and/or intensified surveillance represent alternative approaches. Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is superior to bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. However, reaching a definitive clinical decision is complex, and several variables should be considered for an individualized approach. Accumulating data support the concept of more extensive surgery for newly diagnosed breast cancer in women with a BRCA mutation but new unbaised studies are needed for an evidence-based approach . Such patients treated with breast conservation therapy for early-stage breast cancer are at higher risk of contralateral breast cancer than noncarriers. Primary bilateral mastectomy could also be considered and discussed with these patients. Breast tumors from BRCA1 mutation carriers are predominantly of basal subtype (i.e., triple negative), and BRCA2 mutation carriers are of luminal subtype (i.e., estrogen receptor positive). Decisions on adjuvant treatment are based on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status.

CONCLUSIONS

The complex management of healthy women and breast cancer patients with familial susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer requires an individualized prevention or treatment strategy by an experienced team.

Management of the BRCA Mutation Carrier or High-Risk Patient

Women who are at high risk of breast cancer are eligible for several risk management strategies including intensified surveillance, chemoprevention, and prophylactic surgery. This article reviews and summarizes the risk factors associated with breast cancer, the different risk calculation models available, and risk management strategies.

Endoscopic video-assisted breast surgery: procedures and short-term results

BACKGROUND

We devised a new endoscopic operation for breast diseases. We report the aesthetic and treatment results of this procedure.

METHODS

A 2.5-cm axillary skin incision was made for a single approaching port, and a working space was created by retraction. Under video assistance, we resected the mammary gland partially or totally, and in the case of malignant diseases we also performed a sentinel lymph node biopsy and dissected axillary lymph nodes (levels I and II).

RESULTS

From December 2001 through April 2005, we performed endoscopic video-assisted breast surgery (VABS) in 100 patients with breast diseases. The diseases were benign in 18 patients and malignant in 82 patients. Of the malignant diseases, 80 underwent breast-conserving surgery and 2 underwent skin-sparing mastectomy. There was no significant difference in operation time, blood loss, or blood examinations related with the acute phase reaction between VABS and conventional breast-conserving procedures. All surgical margins were negative on examination of permanent histological preparations. The wounds healed without noticeable scarring. The original shapes of the breast were preserved. All patients expressed their great satisfaction with VABS.

CONCLUSIONS

VABS can be considered as a surgical option and can provide aesthetic advantages for patients with breast disease.

Video-Assisted Breast Surgery: Reconstruction after Resection of More than 33% of the Breast

BACKGROUND

Improvements in reconstructive mammoplasty methods have made it possible to resect more of the mammary gland while achieving good esthetic results in breast-conserving surgery. We report the esthetic results of extended wide resection of the breast with reconstruction procedures.

METHODS

Breast-conserving surgery was performed using a video-assisted breast surgery (VABS) technique. Breast reconstruction was simultaneously performed using the following three methods: mobilization of the remnant mammary gland, transplantation of the lateral tissue flap, and filling with an absorbent synthetic fiber mesh or cotton. The cosmetic results were evaluated with an original five-item-by-four-step scoring system: ABNSW-assessing asymmetry, breast shape, nipple shape, skin condition, and wound scar.

RESULTS

From December 2001 through March 2006, we performed endoscopic VABS in 130 patients with breast diseases. The candidates were 29 patients with breast cancer who required resection of more than 33% of the mammary gland because of ductal carcinoma in situ (1 patient), multiple cancers (6 patients), widely extended lesions (20 patients), and lesions after preoperative systemic therapy (2 patients). Twenty-one patients underwent resection of 33% to 50% of the breast, and 8 underwent resection of more than 50% of the breast. All surgical margins were negative on examination of permanent histological preparations. The original shape of the breast was preserved. There was no local recurrence after follow-up times of 33 months (maximum) and 19 months (average).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly devised reconstruction methods with VABS can markedly increase the mammary gland resection volume while achieving a good esthetic outcome, ensuring a precise disease-free surgical margin, and expanding the indications for breast-conserving therapy.

Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast-cancer prevention?

Genetic testing for women at increased risk of developing breast cancer has moved from the research setting to become part of established clinical practice. By testing for inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, we are identifying more and more women who have an 80% or more lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Since the discovery of BRCA1 in 1994, several clinical studies have led to strategies for reducing the risk of developing breast cancer, including prophylactic mastectomy, prophylactic oophorectomy, and preventive tamoxifen. We believe that in 2005, all prophylactic options, including subcutaneous and total mastectomy should be discussed and made available to women who find themselves unfortunate enough to have inherited a BRCA mutation.

Two staged breast reconstruction following prophylactic bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results in patients who underwent bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy (BSCM) for prophylaxis against invasive breast cancer. All patients were operated on with the same protocol regarding indications and surgical method. Reconstruction was completed in two stages with tissue expanders and permanent round or shaped rough textured gel filled silicone implants. The study includes 52 patients with a mean age of 39.5 years operated on in the period 1991-2000; the period of follow-up ranged between 3 and 12 years with a mean of 7. In this series, not a single case of invasive cancer developed, and the aesthetic results are considered very satisfactory. This data strengthens the case of subcutaneous mastectomy as a valid prophylactic operation.

Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death among North American and Western European women. Recent progress in understanding the genetic basis of breast cancer, along with rising incidence rates, have resulted in increased interest in prophylactic mastectomy as a method of preventing breast cancer, particularly in those with familial susceptibility.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine whether prophylactic mastectomy reduces death from any cause in women who have never had breast cancer and in women who have a history of breast cancer in one breast. The secondary objective was to examine the effect of prophylactic mastectomy on other endpoints including breast cancer incidence, breast cancer mortality, disease-free survival, physical morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches were performed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit, and the Science Citation Index.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria were studies in English of any design type including randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with at least ten participants. Participants included women at risk for breast cancer in at least one breast. Interventions included all types of mastectomy performed for the purpose of preventing breast cancer, including subcutaneous mastectomy, total or simple mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, and radical mastectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Information on patients, interventions, methods, and results were extracted by at least two independent reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed based on how well each study minimized potential selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, and attrition bias. Data for each study were summarized descriptively; quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity of study designs and insufficient reporting. Data were analyzed separately for bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-three studies, including more than 4,000 patients, met inclusion criteria. No randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials were found. Most studies were either case series or cohort studies. All studies had methodological limitations, with the most common source of potential bias being systematic differences between the intervention and comparison groups that could potentially be associated with a particular outcome. Thirteen studies assessed the effectiveness of BPM. No study assessed all-cause mortality after BPM. All studies reporting on incidence of breast cancer and disease-specific mortality reported reductions after BPM. Nine studies assessed psychosocial measures; most reported high levels of satisfaction with the decision to have prophylactic mastectomy (PM) but more variable satisfaction with cosmetic results. Only one study assessed satisfaction with the psychological support provided by healthcare personnel during risk counseling and showed that more women were dissatisfied than satisfied with the support they received in the healthcare setting. Worry over breast cancer was significantly reduced after BPM when compared both to baseline worry levels and to the groups who opted for surveillance rather than BPM. Three studies reported body image/feelings of femininity outcomes, and all reported that a substantial minority (about 20%) reported BPM had adverse effects on those domains. Six studies assessed contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Studies consistently reported reductions in contralateral incidence of breast cancer but were inconsistent about improvements in disease-specific survival. Only one study attempted to control for multiple differences between intervention groups, and this study showed no overall survival advantage for CPM at 15 years. Two case series were exclusively focused on adverse events from prophylactic mastectomy with reconstruction, and both reported rates of unanticipated re-operations from 30% to 49%.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

While published observational studies demonstrated that BPM was effective in reducing both the incidence of, and death from, breast cancer, more rigorous prospective studies (ideally randomized trials) are needed. The studies need to be of sufficient duration and make better attempts to control for selection biases to arrive at better estimates of risk reduction. The state of the science is far from exact in predicting who will get or who will die from breast cancer. By one estimate, most of the women deemed high risk by family history (but not necessarily BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers) who underwent these procedures would not have died from breast cancer, even without prophylactic surgery. Therefore, women need to understand that this procedure should be considered only among those at very high risk of the disease. For women who had already been diagnosed with a primary tumor, the data were particularly lacking for indications for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. While it appeared that contralateral mastectomy may reduce the incidence of cancer in the contralateral breast, there was insufficient evidence about whether, and for whom, CPM actually improved survival. Physical morbidity is not uncommon following PM, and many women underwent unanticipated re-operations (usually due to problems with reconstruction); however, these data need to be updated to reflect changes in surgical procedures and reconstruction. Regarding psychosocial outcomes, women generally reported satisfaction with their decisions to have PM but reported satisfaction less consistently for cosmetic outcomes, with diminished satisfaction often due to surgical complications. Therefore, physical morbidity and post-operative surgical complications were areas that should be considered when deciding about PM. With regard to emotional well-being, most women recovered well postoperatively, reporting reduced cancer worry and showing reduced psychological morbidity from their baseline measures; exceptions also have been noted. Of the psychosocial outcomes measured, body image and feelings of femininity were the most adversely affected.

A comparative study of envelope mastectomy and immediate reconstruction (EMIR) with standard latissimus dorsi immediate breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction has problems with scars at the donor site and on the reconstructed breast. We report the feasibility and aesthetic results of Envelope Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction (EMIR), which utilises a single lateral mammary fold incision.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2001 and 2002, 20 EMIRs were performed in 19 patients, one as a staged bilateral procedure. Twenty consecutive patients, matched for body habitus, who had undergone standard latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction by the same surgeon from 1996 to 2000 were used as controls. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a validated Body Image Scale. Standard post-operative photographs were scored by three independent observers.

RESULTS

Length of stay and complication rates were equivalent between both groups. Cosmetic self-assessment scores on the Body Image Scale and scores by the independent observers were satisfactory for both groups but no statistically significant difference was observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EMIR is a technically feasible and cosmetically acceptable method of immediate breast reconstruction.

Areola-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction is a proved option for patients with early-stage breast cancer requiring mastectomy. Based on the authors' recent pathologic analysis of mastectomy specimens showing less than 1% malignant involvement of the areola, they have begun to perform areola-sparing mastectomies (ASMs) on a select group of patients. They report their results from an ongoing study of ASM at their institution. During a 20-month period, 17 ASMs with immediate reconstruction were performed on 12 patients. Mastectomy was performed for breast cancer prophylaxis (n = 10), ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 4), and less than 2 cm of peripheral infiltrating carcinoma (n = 3). The most frequent incision performed was intraareola (n = 13). Thirteen patients were reconstructed with tissue expanders and 4 with pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. There was 1 postoperative complication, which consisted of a localized wound infection. Overall the authors found that ASM with immediate reconstruction provides excellent aesthetic results with infrequent complications.

Endoscopic muscular latissimus dorsi flap harvesting for immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy

AIM

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the latissimus dorsi musculo-cutaneous flap is well recognized. It allows for satisfactory aesthetic results. To minimize scanning in skin sparing mastectomy patients, we used a surgical technique consisting of an endoscopic harvesting of the latissimus dorsi pure muscular flap with a virtual cavity created by CO(2) gas distention.

METHOD

Between 9 April 2001 and 30 September 2001, 8 patients underwent latissimus dorsi endoscopic harvesting for an immediate breast reconstruction after skin sparing mastectomy.

RESULT

The mean operating endoscopic time was 112 minutes. No open surgical conversion was necessary. The mean lymphatic drainage was 2720 ml with removal of the drainage on post operative day 15.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic harvesting of the latissimus dorsi muscular flap, using a mixed technique of dissection guided by the lighted cleaver forceps and a closed technique by CO(2) insufflation using an endoscope is feasible, reproducible and has acceptable morbidity. This technique brings encouraging aesthetic results after skin sparing mastectomy.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option?

BACKGROUND

In women with breast cancer for whom breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is not the best option, a nipple and areola complex-(NAC) sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction has been proposed as a good and safe alternative to conventional, more radical mastectomy. Surgeons hesitate to perform this operation for fear of recurrence of tumour in the NAC due to undetected nipple involvement (NI) of the tumour. In order to determine whether a NAC-sparing mastectomy is a viable option, the frequency and predictive factors of NI by the tumour were studied in the literature.

METHODS

A literature survey was performed by searching the Medline database. Other references were derived from the material perused.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

NI is found in up to 58% of mastectomy specimens and correlates with tumour size, tumour-areola or tumour-nipple distance, positive lymph nodes and clinical suspicion. Best candidates for NAC-sparing mastectomy are patients with a small tumour (T1) at a large distance (>4-5 cm) from the nipple. However, in these patients BCT has excellent results with low complications and recurrence rates. Considering the incidence of NI in larger tumours (T2 average 33%, T3 average >50%) a NAC-sparing mastectomy may carry an unacceptable high risk for local relapse and should therefore not be advocated.

Prophylactic surgery to reduce breast cancer risk: a brief literature review

Prophylactic mastectomy reduces the likelihood of developing breast cancer among women at heightened risk for breast cancer, but at significant personal cost. Women at increased breast cancer risk on the basis of hormonal history, family history and/or genetic mutation carrier status may consider bilateral prophylactic mastectomy with or without reconstruction to reduce their cancer risk and/or decrease their chances of cancer mortality. Women having received mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer may request contralateral mastectomy to decrease the chances of developing a second breast primary. The potential oncologic value of these procedures must be weighed carefully on a case-by-case basis against the operation's physical and psychological morbidity. The purpose of this literature review is to provide a practice-oriented summary of recent clinical studies attempting to address the relative risks and benefits of preventive surgery for breast cancer. Data are included regarding the psychological factors surrounding patient selection and quality of life outcomes, which become the cornerstone of patient satisfaction and acceptance. Taken together, these data support the Society of Surgical Oncology position statement regarding the proper application of prophylactic surgery for breast cancer.

Envelope mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (EMIR)

AIMS

To develop an oncologically safe and aesthetically acceptable technique for mastectomy, using a muscle flap and tissue expander through one incision.

METHODS

Twelve consecutive patients (mean age 40) underwent an envelope mastectomy (skin and nipple sparing), with immediate reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi muscle flap and tissue expander. Assessment of cosmesis was by review of pre- and post-operative photographs by an independent observer.

RESULTS

During follow-up there have been no recurrences. Assessment of cosmesis gave a score of 44 out of 48 (92%). One prosthesis was removed due to erosion of the prosthesis through the skin.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with large lesions, multi-focal lesions (both invasive and in situ) and recurrent phyllodes tumours may undergo an oncologically safe mastectomy with immediate reconstruction through a single incision that is inconspicuous being in the mid-axillary line. Although follow up is only 8.5 months, long-term studies are being undertaken.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast is the most favorable presentation of breast cancer; therefore appropriate local treatment is imperative. Intraductal carcinoma is being diagnosed more frequently with the increasing use of screening mammography. A number of pathologic features have been identified which are useful for classification and for prognostic information. In addition, the molecular pathology and its relationship to tumor behavior and prognosis is becoming more well understood. The role of axillary dissection has been examined in a number of series and is generally agreed to be unnecessary for this presentation of breast cancer, allowing many women to avoid the sequela of axillary surgery. This review discusses the use of breast conservation treatment and the evolving indications for excision alone in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. The outcomes for breast conservation therapy from both randomized trials and institutional series have confirmed excellent survival rates. Salvage therapy for local recurrence is frequently successful, resulting in nearly equivalent survivals in women undergoing breast conservation therapy compared to mastectomy. In addition, intriguing but preliminary results from both breast cancer prevention studies and trials looking at the use of tamoxifen for intraductal cancer suggest a local control benefit in women using the drug.

Subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction

AIMS

To assess the cosmetic outcome and satisfaction of patients who have undergone subcutaneous mastectomy (SCM) with silicon implant reconstruction and to investigate the factors influencing cosmesis.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients who had had SCM implant reconstruction for treatment of primary breast cancer were assessed for cosmesis by a panel using photographic assessment. Satisfaction and sexuality were studied by a self-evaluation questionnaire.

RESULTS

A good to excellent cosmetic result was achieved in 71 (70. 3%) patients (and in 85% of the group who had immediate insertion of the implant). Eighty-one patients (81%) were moderately or very satisfied (96% of the immediate reconstruction group were so). Factors found to influence cosmesis positively were submuscular insertion of the implant (P<0.001), the lateral incision approach (P<0.001) and immediate reconstruction (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study support the use of SCM with implant reconstruction as the simplest option in those advised to undergo mastectomy and who wish for reconstruction.

The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction

AIMS

A retrospective analysis of the psychological advantages of immediate reconstruction (IR) against delayed reconstruction (DR).

METHODS

A total of 121 patients who underwent different types of breast reconstruction were seen in the follow-up clinic and assessed for: anxiety, depression, body image, self-esteem, sexuality and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of the patients who had IR preferred this technique and 76% of the DR group would have preferred IR. Anxiety and depression were decreased and body image, self-esteem and sexual feeling of attractiveness and satisfaction were significantly superior in the IR group compared with that of the DR group.

CONCLUSION

Patients who had immediate reconstruction recalled less distress and had better psychosocial well being than those who had delayed reconstruction.