Lung cancer in elderly patients

Managing neutropenia in older patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in a community setting

Older patients with cancer who may be more susceptible than younger patients to the myelosuppressive effects of chemotherapy undergo dose delays and reductions that can compromise treatment outcomes. Incidence of neutropenic complications and suboptimal chemotherapy delivery can be reduced with prophylactic colony-stimulating factors; however, their use in older patients with cancer has not been well studied. A randomized, multicenter, community-based trial was designed to compare prophylactic pegfilgrastim use (all cycles of chemotherapy) versus its more common reactive use (at clinicians' discretion) in patients aged 65 years or older with various cancers. Pegfilgrastim use in all cycles reduced the incidence of febrile neutropenia by about 60% and hospitalizations caused by neutropenia and febrile neutropenia by about 50% versus reactive pegfilgrastim use in later cycles. The study showed that older patients with cancer can be treated safely with optimal doses of chemotherapy with appropriate supportive care. Nurses, key collaborators in providing supportive care, can take an active role in identifying older patients who may benefit from pegfilgrastim in all cycles of chemotherapy.

Elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy benefit from first-cycle pegfilgrastim

BACKGROUND

There is a misconception that elderly cancer patients cannot tolerate standard doses of chemotherapy because of the frequency and severity of myelosuppressive complications. The reactive use of colony-stimulating factors (i.e., in response to severe neutropenia) commonly observed in this setting contributes to the frequency and severity of these complications. This study evaluated the incidence of febrile neutropenia and related events in elderly cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim beginning with cycle 1 (proactive) in comparison with pegfilgrastim initiated after cycle 1 at the physician's discretion (reactive).

METHODS

Patients (> or = 65 years of age) with either solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were randomly assigned to receive pegfilgrastim either proactively or reactively. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia.

RESULTS

There were 852 patients enrolled (median age, 72 years). Proactive pegfilgrastim use resulted in a significantly lower incidence of febrile neutropenia for both solid tumor and NHL patients compared with reactive use. Proactive pegfilgrastim use also led to fewer hospitalizations resulting from neutropenia and febrile neutropenia by approximately 50%. Antibiotic use was lower for solid tumor patients receiving proactive pegfilgrastim and equivalent in the two NHL groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest, randomized, prospective trial evaluating growth factor support in typical elderly cancer patients. Proactive pegfilgrastim use effectively produced a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia and related events in elderly patients with either solid tumors or NHL receiving an array of mild to moderately neutropenic chemotherapy regimens. Pegfilgrastim should be used proactively in elderly cancer patients to support the optimal delivery of standard chemotherapy.

Topotecan in the treatment of elderly patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Almost 70% of all patients with lung cancer in the United States are>65 years of age, and the incidence of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) increases with age until the eighth decade of life. However, elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and are often suboptimally treated. The validity of age as a prognostic factor for toxicity or survival remains controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To investigate the safety and efficacy of topotecan (an approved treatment for relapsed SCLC) in older patients, we performed a retrospective analysis in patients >or= 65 years of age versus patients < 65 years of age from 5 large topotecan trials. In all 5 trials, patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 per day via a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were assessed for both age groups.

RESULTS

Topotecan was similarly tolerated in both age groups, with generally manageable hematologic toxicity. The incidence, duration, and onset of severe hematologic toxicities did not vary significantly with age. In the<65 age group, grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported in 72% and 32% of patients, respectively; in the >or= 65 age group, grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported in 77% and 31% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was less common in the<65 age group. Nonhematologic toxicities, median time to progression, and overall survival were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This is the first demonstration of the safety and efficacy of topotecan in older patients with recurrent SCLC. Future studies are needed to fully characterize the role of topotecan in the treatment of older patients.

VATS Anatomic Pulmonary Resection in Octogenarians

Although modern techniques in anesthesia and surgery have reduced morbidity and mortality for pulmonary resection, some physicians still consider advanced age a contraindication to resection of lung cancer. We examined our experience with VATS lobectomy in octogenarians at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center over 12 years (1992–2004). There were 159 patients. Mean age was 83 years (range, 80–94 years) consisting of 61 males (38%) and 96 females (62%). Operations included 153 lobectomies (96%), 3 bilobectomies (2%), and 3 pneumonectomies (2%). Two operations were converted to thoracotomy (1%), one due to bleeding, and one due to poor visualization. Median hospital stay was 4.00 ± 6.39 days. One hundred thirty-one patients (82%) had no complications. The most common complication was arrhythmias occurring in 8/159 (5%) patients. There were three perioperative deaths (1.8%). Pathology revealed 104 adenocarcinomas (65%), 25 squamous cell carcinomas (16%), 5 adeno-squamous carcinomas (3%), 7 bronchoalveolar carcinomas (4%), 7 large cell carcinomas (4%), 4 carcinoid tumors (3%), 4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (3%), 1 mucoepidermoid carcinoma (<1%), 1 lymphoma (<1%), and 1 pulmonary metastasis (<1%). Median follow-up was 29 months. The results of this series show that age alone is not a contraindication to the surgical treatment of lung cancer.

Topotecan in the treatment of recurrent small cell lung cancer: an update

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a high propensity for early regional and distant metastasis. Response rates to first-line chemotherapy are typically high, but short lived. The outlook for patients with recurrent SCLC is poor. A variety of single- and multi-agent chemotherapy regimens have met with limited success in patients with recurrent SCLC, and survival is generally measured in weeks. Until recently, further chemotherapy was not widely considered appropriate for patients with relapsed SCLC. The choice of chemotherapy at relapse is dependent on many factors, including type of and response to first-line therapy, the treatment-free interval, and the patient's performance status. Intravenous topotecan (Hycamtin; GlaxoSmithKline; Philadelphia, PA) has provided oncologists and patients in many countries with an effective and tolerable therapeutic option for recurrent SCLC. The clinical profile of topotecan was established in several phase II studies and confirmed in a randomized, phase III trial versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Bedford Laboratories; Bedford, OH), and vincristine (Oncovin; Eli Lilly and Company; Indianapolis, IN)--CAV. In those studies, topotecan exhibited antitumor activity in both chemosensitive and refractory disease. Further, topotecan therapy is associated with significant symptom palliation in this patient population. Because the toxicity profile of topotecan is predictable, generally manageable, and noncumulative, the agent also has potential utility in patients with a poor prognosis and/or a poor performance status. Alternative dosing regimens (lower dose, weekly) and the introduction of an oral formulation may expand the use of topotecan as a single agent and in combination therapy in the second- and first-line treatment of this disease.

Sequential versus concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients and patients with poor performance status: results of two Phase II, multicenter trials

The primary objective of these trials was to determine the 1-year survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) patients (> or =70 years with PS 0-2 or > or =18 years with PS 2) receiving sequential paclitaxel and carboplatin (P --> C) or concurrent P + C. The secondary objectives were assessment of toxicities and quality of life. A total of 121 patients with NSCLC were treated. P--> C patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly x 3, followed by 1 week of rest; these 4-week cycles were repeated until relapse. At relapse, patients received carboplatin (AUC = 5, IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle until evidence of further progression or lack of improvement. P + C patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 2), weekly x 3, followed by 1 week of rest, until relapse. Patients in both studies were premedicated prior to paclitaxel administration. Sequential P + C resulted in a median survival of 8.2 months (range: <1-18.8) and P + C patients had a median survival of 9.2 months (range: <1-22.0). In both groups (P--> C) and P + C), the 1-year survival was 31%. For patients treated sequentially, treatment-related AEs (TRAE, > or =Grade 3) included fatigue (7%), neuropathy (5%), and leukopenia and diarrhea (3%, each). Grade 4 AEs were limited to neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and sepsis (1 episode each). For patients receiving concurrent P + C, TRAE included neutropenia and leukopenia (15%, each) and shortness of breath and bilateral bone pain (10%, each). Leukopenia (n = 2) and neutropenia (n = 1) were the only Grade 4 events reported. The analysis of quality of life (QOL) questionnaires indicated that there were no obvious differences between treatment groups during the study. These drugs and treatment schema were well-tolerated when administered in the community setting and resulted in survival rates that were similar to what is reported in the literature with combination therapy administered to "high risk" patients. Finding the optimal chemotherapy regimen, that can be tolerated, remains a challenge in elderly patients.