Pain in the nursing home

Pain intensity among institutionalized elderly: a comparison between numerical scales and verbal descriptors

AbstractOBJECTIVECorrelating two unidimensional scales for measurement of self-reported pain intensity for elderly and identifying a preference for one of the scales.METHODA study conducted with 101 elderly people living in Nursing Home who reported any pain and reached ( 13 the scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination. A Numeric Rating Scale - (NRS) of 11 points and a Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS) of five points were compared in three evaluations: overall, at rest and during movement.RESULTSWomen were more representative (61.4%) and the average age was 77.0±9.1 years. NRS was completed by 94.8% of the elderly while VDS by 100%. The association between the mean scores of NRS with the categories of VDS was significant, indicating convergent validity and a similar metric between the scales.CONCLUSIONPain measurements among institutionalized elderly can be made by NRS and VDS; however, the preferred scale for the elderly was the VDS, regardless of gender.

The prevalence, impact and management of musculoskeletal disorders in older people living in care homes: a systematic review

The aim was to systematically review the literature describing the prevalence, impact and current management of musculoskeletal pain in older people living in care homes. Published literature (AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, psycINFO, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library) and unpublished literature (OpenGrey, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Current Controlled Trials, UK National Research Register Archive) were searched on 1 March 2015. All studies assessing the prevalence, impact and management of musculoskeletal disorders in older people living in care homes were included. Literature was appraised using the CASP cohort and qualitative critical appraisal tools. Data were analysed using descriptive statistical approaches, meta-analysis and meta-ethnography techniques. Twenty-four papers reporting the results of 263,775 care home residents in 12 countries were identified. The evidence base was moderate in quality. Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain for people in care homes was 30.2 % (95 % confidence intervals 29.9-30.5 %; n = 105,463). Care home residents reported that musculoskeletal pain had a significant impact on their perceived independence and overall ability to participate in everyday activities of daily living. Three papers which presented data on interventions demonstrated that whilst multi-component assessment and management packages did not significantly change clinical outcomes, these empowered care home staff to feel more confident in managing these patients. Musculoskeletal pain is a common problem in care homes worldwide, and residents report significant impact on their lives. However, there is uncertainty regarding how to assess and manage such pain. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42014009824.

Validité et utilité clinique d'une grille d'observation (PACSLAC-F) pour évaluer la douleur chez des aînés atteints de démence vivant en milieu de soins de longue durée

This study presents the validation of the French Canadian version (PACLSAC-F) of the Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate (PACSLAC). Unlike the published validation of the English version of the PACSLAC, which was validated retrospectively, the French version was validated prospectively. The PACSLAC-F was completed by nurses working in long-term care facilities after observing 86 seniors, with severe cognitive impairment, in calm, painful or distressing but non-painful situations. The test-retest and inter-observer reliability, the internal consistency, and the discriminent validity were found to be satisfactory. To evaluate the convergent validity with the DOLOPLUS-2 and the clinical relevance of the PACSLAC, it was also completed by nurses during their work shift, with 26 additional patients, for three days per week during a period of four weeks. These results encourage us to test the PACSLAC in a comprehensive program of pain management targeting this population.

End-of-life care in nursing home settings: do race or age matter?

OBJECTIVE

One-quarter of all U.S. chronic-disease deaths occur in nursing homes, yet few studies examine palliative care quality in these settings. This study tests whether racial and/or age-based differences in end-of-life care exist in these institutional settings.

METHODS

We abstracted residents' charts (N = 1133) in 12 nursing homes. Researchers collected data on indicators of palliative care in two domains of care--advance care planning and pain management--and on residents' demographic and health status variables. Analyses tested for differences by race and age.

RESULTS

White residents were more likely than minorities to have DNR orders (69.5% vs. 37.3%), living wills (39% vs. 5%), and health care proxies (36.2% vs. 11.8%; p < .001 for each). Advance directives were highly and positively correlated with age. In-depth advance care planning discussions between residents, families, and health care providers were rare for all residents, irrespective of demographic characteristics. Nursing staff considered older residents to have milder and less frequent pain than younger residents. We found no disparities in pain management based on race.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

To the extent that advance care planning improves care at the end of life, racial minorities in nursing homes are disadvantaged compared to their white fellow residents. Focusing on in-depth discussions of values and goals of care can improve palliative care for all residents and may help to ameliorate racial disparities in end-of-life care. Staff should consider residents of all ages as appropriate recipients of advance care planning efforts and should be cognizant of the fact that individuals of all ages can experience pain. Nursing homes may do a better job than other health care institutions in eliminating racial disparities in pain management.

Disparities in pain management between cognitively intact and cognitively impaired nursing home residents

This study tests the association between residents' cognitive impairment and nursing homes' pain management practices. We used chart abstraction to collect data on 551 adults in six North Carolina nursing homes. From the standard data collected in the Minimum Data Set, 24% of residents experienced pain in the preceding week. Reports of pain decreased as cognitive abilities declined: nurses completing the Minimum Data Set reported pain prevalence of 34%, 31%, 24%, and 10%, respectively, for residents with no, mild, moderate, and severe cognitive impairment (P<0.001), demonstrating a "dose-response"-type result. Eighty percent of cognitively intact residents received pain medications, compared to 56% of residents with severe impairment (P<0.001). Cognitively impaired residents had fewer orders for scheduled pain medications than did their less cognitively impaired peers. Yet the presence of diagnoses likely to cause pain did not vary based on residents' cognitive status. We conclude that pain is underrecognized in nursing home residents with cognitive impairment and that cognitively impaired residents often have orders for "as needed" analgesics when scheduled medications would be more appropriate.

[The systematic evaluation of instruments designed to assess pain in persons with limited ability to communicate]

Chronic pain is often underdetected and undertreated in long-term care facilities. The use of self-report measures of pain (such as the visual analogue scale) is often problematic for older adults residing in long-term care because of the high prevalence of visual and auditory deficits and severe cognitive impairment. Observational measures of pain have been developed to address this concern. A systematic grid designed to assess the properties of existing observational measures of pain was used for seniors with dementia. The grid focused on the evaluation of content validity (12 items), construct validity (12 items), reliability (13 items) and clinical utility (10 items). Among the 24 instruments that were evaluated, several were deemed to be promising in the assessment of pain among older persons with severe dementia. Nonetheless, additional research is needed before their routine integration in the practices of long-term care settings.

The pain of residents with terminal cancer in USA nursing homes: family members' perspectives

Cancer pain continues to be poorly treated despite efforts aimed at improvement. This causes considerable distress to both patients and their families. The purpose of this research is to explore the perspectives of family members of nursing home residents with terminal cancer, about pain and pain management. Participants who believed their pain could be better managed viewed their family member's pain and illness differently than those who believed the pain could not be managed better. The family members who believed better pain management was possible often took on the role of advocate and saw to it that the pain was addressed. Those who believed that their relative did not have adequate pain relief, but felt better management was not possible, expressed no concerns about this aspect of their relatives' care; they could not separate their relatives' pain from their illness. The interpretation and presence of adequate pain management is critical for family members to construct meaning around their relative's pain. When family members do not believe that the pain can be managed any better, this acts as a barrier to the resident's access to adequate pain management.

Pain and pain medication use in community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND

Pain is a common symptom and significant problem for older adults; up to one half of community-dwelling older adults have pain that interferes with normal function.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pain among a racially and gender-balanced sample of community-dwelling older adults and evaluate sociodemographic factors associated with the reporting of pain. Both nonprescription (over-the-counter [OTC]) and prescription pain medications used by the participants and the sociodemographic factors associated with having medication prescribed were considered.

METHOD

This was a population-based, prospective, observational study. Subjects were participants in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Study of Aging, a stratified random sample of Medicare beneficiaries who completed in-home interviews (1999-2001). Assessments included sociodemographic factors and pain; interviewers listed all prescription and OTC pain medications used. Pain medications were coded as NSAIDs, opiates, and miscellaneous pain medications. A composite ordinal measure reflecting pain severity and frequency ranged from 0 = no pain to 4 = dreadful or agonizing pain > or =4 times per week.

RESULTS

There were 1000 participants in the UAB Study of Aging (mean [SD] age, 75.3 [6.7] years; 50% black; 50% male; 51% rural residence). Seventy-four percent of the subjects reported pain; among these, 52% had daily pain, with 26% reporting dreadful or agonizing pain. Logistic regression controlling for other sociodemographic factors (age, gender, race, education, income, and marital status) found that rural residence (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9; P = 0.02) was significantly associated with the reporting of pain. Prescription pain medications were used by 35% of persons with pain and by 17% without pain (P < 0.001); OTC pain medications were used by 52% of persons with pain and by 45% of persons without pain (P = 0.06). Of persons reporting pain, 28% were taking neither prescription nor OTC pain medications; 16% took both and 20% took only prescription pain medications. Logistic regression found that factors associated with taking a prescription pain medication were: unmarried status (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.1-2.2) and pain frequency/severity (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6). Taking an OTC pain medication was associated with lower odds of taking a prescription pain medication (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.4-0.7). Age, gender, race, education, rural residence, transportation difficulty, income, and being on Medicaid were not associated with prescription pain medication use.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription pain medication use was associated with pain frequency/severity after adjusting for sociodemographics and OTC pain medications in this study of community-dwelling older adults, suggesting that even with medications, individuals remained in pain.

Substantial Daily Pain Among Nursing Home Residents

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of substantial daily pain among nursing home residents aged 65 and older.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND METHODS

The Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual or admission assessment, available September 2002, for Alabama nursing home residents was used. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of such pain with nursing home characteristics as well as resident-specific factors.

RESULTS

The analysis is based on 27,628 nursing home residents 65 and older with mean age of 82.8 years; 20% African American; 25% male. Seventeen percent had substantial daily pain. By nursing home, reported substantial daily pain prevalence ranged from 0% to 54.7%. The prevalence of pain was less in smaller nursing homes (P < .001). Bivariate correlations were significant for all sociodemographic and mental status variables; number of medications; dementia; thyroid, musculoskeletal, neurological, pulmonary, and sensory disorders; allergies; anemia; and cancer. Factors independently correlated with substantial daily pain included (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) sociodemographic characteristics: white race (1.5, 1.3-1.7), female (1.3, 1.2-1.5), married (1.1, 1.0-1.2), admission within year (2.0, 1.8-2.1); nursing home characteristics: nonprofit or government financing (1.3, 1.2-1.5), greater number of residents (1.4, 1.3-1.5); subject-specific conditions: no cognitive impairment (1.6, 1.5-1.7), communication ability (1.4, 1.2-1.5), sad mood/depression (1.5, 1.4-1.6), taking 10 or more medications (2.0, 1.9-2.2), musculoskeletal disease (1.9, 1.7-2.0), anemia (1.1, 1.0-1.2), and cancer (1.6, 1.4-1.8). Lower odds of substantial daily pain were associated with older age, rural locale, dementia, and thyroid, neurological, pulmonary, and sensory disorders.

DISCUSSION

This study highlights within-state variation in MDS reporting by nursing home as well as resident-specific factors associated with daily substantial pain. Rural, for-profit, and low-occupancy nursing homes had less documented pain. Communication ability and not having cognitive impairment were important factors in having such pain reported.

An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement on Assessment of Pain in Older Persons

This paper represents an expert-based consensus statement on pain assessment among older adults. It is intended to provide recommendations that will be useful for both researchers and clinicians. Contributors were identified based on literature prominence and with the aim of achieving a broad representation of disciplines. Recommendations are provided regarding the physical examination and the assessment of pain using self-report and observational methods (suitable for seniors with dementia). In addition, recommendations are provided regarding the assessment of the physical and emotional functioning of older adults experiencing pain. The literature underlying the consensus recommendations is reviewed. Multiple revisions led to final reviews of 2 complete drafts before consensus was reached.

Nurses' reflections on pain management in a nursing home setting

Achieving optimal and safe pain-management practices in the nursing home setting continues to challenge administrators, nurses, physicians, and other health care providers. Several factors in nursing home settings complicate the conduct of clinical process improvement research. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the perceptions of a sample of Colorado nursing home staff who participated in a study to develop and evaluate a multifaceted pain-management intervention. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 103 staff from treatment and control nursing homes, audiotaped, and content analyzed. Staff identified changes in their knowledge and attitudes about pain and their pain-assessment and management practices. Progressive solutions and suggestions for changing practice include establishing an internal pain team and incorporating nursing assistants into the care planning process. Quality improvement strategies can accommodate the special circumstances of nursing home care and build the capacity of the nursing homes to initiate and monitor their own process-improvement programs using a participatory research approach.

The challenge of providing palliative care in the nursing home: part 1 external factors

One impact of the baby boom generation and improved medical care is that nursing homes will be the place of care and site of death for growing numbers of frail, older persons dying of chronic progressive illnesses. The nursing home settings may appear to be an appropriate environment wherein residents could receive palliative care, but the literature suggests that provision of such care is replete with challenge. Some of these challenges are external to the nursing home environment and are beyond the setting's control, others have internal origins and to some extent may be under the home's control. In part I of this two-part article, we review and critically analyse the primary external factors identified in the literature -- characteristics of the residents -- as they impact on the ability of care homes to deliver palliative care.

Assessing the appropriateness of pain medication prescribing practices in nursing homes

OBJECTIVES

To test a tool for screening the quality of nursing home (NH) pain medication prescribing.

DESIGN

Validity and reliability of measurement tool developed for a pre/postintervention with untreated comparison group.

SETTING

Six treatment NHs and six comparison NHs in rural and urban Colorado.

PARTICIPANTS

NH staff, physicians, and repeated 20% random sample of each home's residents (N = 2,031).

INTERVENTION

Nurse and physician education; NH internal pain team to champion better pain management using a pain vital sign, consultations, and rounds.

MEASUREMENTS

An expert panel reviewed the Pain Medication Appropriateness Scale (PMAS) for content validity. Research assistants interviewed NH residents, assessed them for pain using standardized instruments, and reviewed their medical records for prescriptions and use of pain and adjuvant medication. Construct validity was assessed by comparing the PMAS of residents in pain with the PMAS of those not in pain and comparing scores in homes in which the intervention was more effective with those in which it was less effective, using the Fisher exact and Student t tests. Interrater and test-retest reliability were measured.

RESULTS

The mean total PMAS was 64% of optimal. Fewer than half of residents with predictably recurrent pain were prescribed scheduled pain medication; 23% received at least one high-risk medication. PMAS scores were better for residents not in pain (68% vs 60%, P = .004) and in homes where nurses' knowledge of pain assessment and management improved or stayed the same during the intervention (69% vs 61%, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

The PMAS is useful for assessing pain medication prescribing in NHs and elucidates why so many residents have poorly controlled pain.

Using quality improvement to address pain management practices in nursing homes

The objective of this study was to test whether a quality improvement intervention can improve pain management in nursing homes. Experts in quality improvement and clinical pain management provided nursing home staff leaders with feedback on pain quality indicator data, education in pain management, and technical assistance to apply the Plan-Do-Study-Act model of quality improvement. Trained abstractors completed structured chart audits at baseline and five months to capture quality indicator data related to pain assessment and treatment. Residents in pain who underwent pain assessments increased from 8% to 29% (P < 0.001). Residents receiving non-pharmacological pain treatments increased from 31% to 42% (P = 0.010), but pain medication use did not change. Among residents with daily moderate or excruciating pain, complete pain assessment was associated with increased probability of pain medication use. Quality improvement is a promising method to improve pain management in nursing homes.

Staff Perceptions Concerning Barriers and Facilitators to End-of-Life Care in the Nursing Home

Although many nursing home residents have chronic, life-limiting conditions, most die without the benefit of palliative care or with palliation delayed until the last days of life. The goal of this study was to determine whether the presence of a comprehensive palliative care program in nursing homes would affect the knowledge and attitudes of the staff. The intervention group was able to identify more problems in delivering palliative care than the control group, but this only reached statistical significance on 2 items. Nevertheless, the current study suggests that the presence of a palliative care program within a nursing home does increase general knowledge of the problems faced in caring for the dying.

Methods of pain assessment in residents of long-term care facilities: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Structured programs for routine pain assessment and treatment are necessary to optimize care for residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). A pilot study was designed to develop, implement, and evaluate a system for pain assessment and monitoring in a LTCF. Additional goals were to determine whether a verbal and/or non-verbal tool adequately assess pain in residents of LTCFs and whether the pharmacologic therapy for pain changes with the implementation of a pain assessment and monitoring system.

DESIGN

Quantitative, nonexperimental design using two pain assessment tools.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a LTCF in a rural midwestern setting.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population for phase I included residents on any pain medication (regularly scheduled or as needed) on the secure dementia unit. The target population for phase II consisted of residents on any pain medication on an open unit.

INTERVENTION

Training was provided to the nursing staff on how to use two pain assessment tools, one verbal (colored visual analog scale) and one nonverbal (observed pain target behaviors), and documentation. In addition, a continuing education program on pain assessment and management in elderly residents and barriers to pain management in LTCFs was offered to medical providers.

MEASUREMENTS

Evaluation with the colored visual analog scale (CVAS) occurred twice daily. Pain target behaviors were monitored throughout the day and recorded by nursing staff at the end of each shift. All residents in the study population were monitored daily for six months.

RESULTS

Most of the residents on both units were unable to use the verbal tool; however, the nonverbal tool was used successfully for all residents studied. On the dementia unit, the use of pain medications increased, and pain target behaviors decreased during the study period; on the open unit, the use of pain medications remained stable, and pain target behaviors decreased.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that an increase in awareness of pain may facilitate an improvement in the assessment and management of pain in residents of LTCFs. The feasibility of the nonverbal pain monitoring method shown in this study has positive implications on quality of care issues if generalizable to a larger population.

Practical considerations in the assessment and treatment of pain in adults with physical disabilities

Adults aging with physical disabilities experience a variety of pain disorders that affect their functionality and QOL. It is important that clinicians caring for this population be knowledgeable about this common symptom and be able to perform a thorough history and physical examination. In addition, it is imperative to have a good working knowledge of the strengths and limitations of the treatments available.

[Headaches in the elderly]

ACCORDING TO AGE: It is generally thought that the prevalence of headaches decreases with ageing. However recent studies, with stricter epidemiology and methodology, clearly indicate that this decreases is less obvious than that perceived. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY HEADACHES: In elderly patients, primary headaches and notably migraine (often with altered presentation) are less frequent, even though new authentic cases may appear. However the other types of headache are clearly present. In particular, the incidence and prevalence of secondary headaches slightly increases and they represent up to 30% of all the headaches observed, compared with less than 10% in young or adult patients. The causes of such symptomatic headaches are multiple and it is important to be able to identify them since an aetiological treatment is often possible. REGARDING TREATMENT: The symptomatic treatment of headaches in the elderly follows the same principles as that of younger patients. However, the side effects and drug interactions related to pharmacological treatments can be disastrous in fragilised patients. It is therefore important to emphasize the interest of physical methods of analgesia, particularly adapted to the elderly. Some of these methods have demonstrated their efficacy and are recommended by international consensuses.

Improving Nursing Home Staff Knowledge and Attitudes About Pain

PURPOSE

Effective pain management remains a serious problem in the nursing home setting. Barriers to achieving optimal pain practices include staff knowledge deficits, biases, and attitudes that influence assessment and management of the residents' pain.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Twelve nursing homes participated in this intervention study: six treatment homes and six control homes, divided evenly between urban and rural locations. Three hundred licensed and unlicensed nursing home staff members completed written knowledge and attitude surveys at baseline, and 378 staff members completed the surveys after intervention implementation.

RESULTS

Baseline results revealed notable knowledge deficits in the areas of pharmacology, drug addiction and dependence, side effect management, and nonpharmacologic management-strategy effectiveness. Significant differences were noted by job title (registered nurse/licensed practical nurse/certified nursing assistant). Case studies displayed a knowledge application problem, with nurses often filtering resident pain reports through observed resident behaviors. The intervention led to significant improvement in knowledge scores in some, but not all, the treatment homes. Perceived barriers to effective pain management showed a significant decline across all study nursing homes.

IMPLICATIONS

Knowledge deficits related to pain management persist in nursing homes. An interactive multifaceted educational program was only partially successful in improving knowledge across settings and job categories. Attitudes and beliefs appear more difficult to change, whereas environmental and contextual factors appeared to be reducing perceived barriers to effective pain management across all participating nursing homes.

The Management of Pain in Long-Term Care

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to present salient principles of pain management in nursing homes and other long-term care settings.

METHODS

Review and author opinion.

RESULTS

Pain is a common problem in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities. Often unrecognized and under-treated, pain is a major source of suffering and functional impairment. These patients present substantial barriers to pain assessment and management. Multiple concurrent disease processes, cognitive impairment and communication difficulties, and limited access to diagnostic technologies make assessment more difficult. Multiple medications, altered physiology and pharmacology and limited access to a variety of drug and non-drug interventions make treatment strategies more difficult to implement.

DISCUSSION

Clinicians who care for patients receiving long-term care services must help establish a treatment plan that is reasonable given the limited resources and skills available in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities. Medication regimens should be simplified as much as possible. Contingency plans for pain management must be anticipated and made available so that delays do not occur during medication changes or dosage adjustments. Long-term care facilities need substantial support from physicians and other pain experts for education to continuously update their skills and knowledge. As the need for health systems for frail elderly persons continues to grow, it is important to provide comfort and effective pain control appropriate for these new settings.

The assessment and management of pain among older people in care homes: current status and future directions

Pain is highlighted as a significant, yet neglected problem among older people, particularly in long-term care settings. The effects of inadequate assessment and treatment of pain among older people may lead to multiple problems. Problems arise due to cognitive impairment of clients and inadequate assessment by healthcare professionals. Analgesics are under-used and there is a need for improved education of both healthcare professionals and older people regarding attitudes to pain and ageing. Research is needed into the prevalence of pain among older people in United Kingdom (UK) care homes, how best to further educate healthcare professionals regarding pain management and how to enable older people to be facilitative partners in this process.

Chronic non-cancer pain in older people: current evidence for prescribing

Chronic pain is a serious problem for many older people, yet its management in this population is often less than satisfactory. The high incidence of toxicity and side effects with some medications and irrational fears of opioid dependence are significant barriers to effective pain management. In this article, the research evidence relating to these issues is examined, and their impact on nurse prescribing considered. More studies are needed to assess the veracity of opposing arguments, and to support effective assessment and prescribing by nurses.