Surgical Treatment for Female Geriatric Incontinence

Worse long-term surgical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing SPARC retropubic midurethral sling placement

OBJECTIVE

• The purpose of our study was to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes following placement of a retropubic mid-urethral sling in patients aged 70 and over and to compare outcomes with those of a younger cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• Patients with stress urinary incontinence undergoing retropubic polypropylene sling (SPARC(TM) ) placement were entered into a prospective, institutional review board-approved database. • Patients with at least 12 months follow-up were sent postoperative questionnaires assessing outcomes. Results of these questionnaires were compared for patients aged 70 or older and those younger than 70 years.

RESULTS

• A total of 337 patients who underwent SPARC sling placement in an 8-year period were identified. Of these, 290 patients had a minimum of 12 months follow-up, and among these patients, 235 (81%) answered postoperative mailed questionnaires. Average follow-up was 45.2 months. • Thirty-seven patients were 70 or older, and 198 were younger than 70. The older group had significantly lower success (53.1% vs 83.6%) and dry (6.1% vs 35.3%) rates than the younger cohort. • Assessment of preoperative variables determined that the older cohort had significantly more vaginal deliveries and a higher percentage of patients who had undergone either hysterectomy, previous prolapse and/or incontinence surgery. • There was no significant difference in Valsalva leak-point pressure, percentage of patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency or type 0 stress urinary incontinence between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

• Experience at our Institution shows that there are clearly lower success rates in older patients undergoing a SPARC sling as compared with a younger cohort of patients. • Parity, hysterectomy and previous pelvic organ prolapse/anti-incontinence surgery may also play a role in the difference in outcomes.

Age Is Not a Limiting Factor for Midurethral Sling Procedures in the Elderly with Urinary Incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The object was to evaluate clinical outcome of the midurethral sling procedures in the elderly compared with middle-aged women.

METHODS

A total of 266 women who underwent midurethral sling procedures with at least follow-up greater than 6 months were included in the study. Patients were divided as the elderly group (65 years old or older, n = 60) and the middle-aged group (45-64 years old, n = 206).

RESULTS

Although postoperative urge symptoms were more prevalent in the elderly group (25.0%) than in the middle-aged group (6.3%), there were no significant differences between the two groups for the rates of postoperative urge incontinence (p = 0.159). Stress incontinence was cured by 91.3% in the middle-aged group and 85.0% in the elderly group, respectively (p = 0.158).

CONCLUSIONS

Age does not seem to be a significant risk factor for failure of midurethral sling procedures.

The influence of age on quality of life outcome in women following a tension-free vaginal tape procedure

PURPOSE

Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) has been introduced and demonstrated to be an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Improved general health in the elderly population has led to a greater number of patients seeking surgical treatment for incontinence. We evaluated the impact of TVT on quality of life in elderly patients, defined as age 70 and older.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 67 patients with genuine stress incontinence differentiated by age into 2 groups, namely 21 who were 70 years and older, and a control group of 46 younger than 70 years, with a validated questionnaire. We assessed quality of life changes following TVT for incontinence treatment.

RESULTS

At the most recent followup quality of life scores improved significantly in the 2 groups (p <0.05). Stress incontinence improved significantly in the 2 groups (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TVT is effective in each group. It is a viable treatment option to improve quality of life in older women with stress urinary incontinence.

Basic evaluation of female urinary incontinence

Urinary incontinence is a common disorder that is frequently underreported because of its social implications. Although several types of urinary incontinence are recognized, they can be generally classified as failure of the bladder to store or failure of the urethral mechanism. A systematic approach for the evaluation of incontinence that includes history, physical examination, basic laboratory tests, and often urodynamic evaluation, offers the most comprehensive assessment of the etiology of incontinence.

Urinary incontinence in the elderly

Urinary incontinence is a prevalent problem among the elderly and has a significant clinical, social, psychological, and economical impact. In spite of these consequences, often very little is done to evaluate the problem. Furthermore, patients may be reluctant to bring their complaint to the attention of their health care provider. This broad review will discuss the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of urinary incontinence. The initial evaluation and treatment options will also be outlined. As the aged population continues to grow, physicians can expect to see this problem with greater frequency. It is hoped that this discussion will facilitate the evaluation and management of this common but frequently neglected problem.

Urinary incontinence: medical and psychosocial aspects

Recognition has been growing over the past two decades that urinary incontinence is a rather widespread condition among older adults. Prevalence rates of about 30% for any incontinence and about 5% for severe incontinence among older adults were suggested by several European studies and have recently been confirmed by American studies. The rates are typically higher among women than men. Despite these findings, much about the true distribution of urinary incontinence remains to be firmly established. The proportion of different types and the differences between sexes, ages, and races need to be confirmed using representative population samples and valid measures of incontinence. These distributions cannot be accurately described using clinical populations. Perhaps because urinary incontinence is viewed as highly embarrassing, it has not been a focus of media coverage or public discussion. More attention by the media and by health-care professionals would build public awareness of the condition. Older adults and their caregivers need to know that urinary incontinence is common and treatable, so that they will identify it promptly and bring it to their physicians' attention. Health-care providers and social workers must also be alert to the possibility of incontinence among their clients. They should be prepared to ask older patients directly, because many patients may disregard urine loss or be too embarrassed to mention it. Currently, much of the management of urinary incontinence appears to be self-devised. Many incontinent persons have not talked to a physician about their problem. The largest proportion of those who attempt to control their urine loss use absorbent products or try to avoid loss by awareness of toilet locations and frequent toileting. Reliance on these methods is unfortunate because much progress has been made in developing diagnostic and treatment procedures for urinary incontinence. For example, surgical procedures to rectify an incompetent sphincter have been shown to be effective and are generally accepted. There are a number of medications effective for controlling detrusor instability. Further, various behavioral techniques appear to be promising as noninvasive initial interventions for many patients. We are on weaker ground regarding the prevention of and early intervention in urinary incontinence. The existing epidemiological data on the development of incontinence are poor. We do not know the proportion of urinary incontinence that is transient and the proportion that is chronic or established. Nor do we know the risk factors for onset and progression of the condition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Practical management of urinary incontinence

A comprehensive evaluation of incontinence using office-based techniques may discover reversible problems such as delirium, urinary infections, vaginitis, depression, drug effects, endocrinologic causes, immobility, or impaction. Treatment of these causes may alleviate incontinence. Bedside urodynamics are a sensitive, specific, and useful office-based technique that can identify detrusor instability, overflow incontinence, or stress incontinence. Low urinary flow rate, difficulty with catheterization, slow bladder filling or severe urgency, bladder capacity over 600 ml, and post-void residual over 150 ml need referral. Patients with hematuria, recurrent infections, recent surgery or pelvic irradiation, and pelvic or prostatic masses also need further evaluation. A number of medical and behavioral therapies are available for stress incontinence and detrusor instability that can substantially reduce incontinence, but most patients with overflow have more complicated problems requiring further evaluation, surgery, or long-term bladder drainage.