Sedation of the Agitated, Critically Ill Patient Without an Artificial Airway

Airway management in trauma

Trauma has assumed epidemic proportion. 10% of global road accident deaths occur in India. Hypoxia and airway mismanagement are known to contribute up to 34% of pre-hospital deaths in these patients. A high degree of suspicion for actual or impending airway obstruction should be assumed in all trauma patients. Objective signs of airway compromise include agitation, obtundation, cyanosis, abnormal breath sound and deviated trachea. If time permits, one should carry out a brief airway assessment prior to undertaking definitive airway management in these patients. Simple techniques for establishing and maintaining airway patency include jaw thrust maneuver and/or use of oro- and nas-opharyngeal airways. All attempts must be made to perform definitive airway management whenever airway is compromised that is not amenable to simple strategies. The selection of airway device and route- oral or -nasal, for tracheal intubation should be based on nature of patient injury, experience and skill level.

Sedation in the critically ill patient

The goal of critical care medicine is to support organ function and maintain homeostasis until healing can occur. Sedation and analgesia may blunt the physiologic and psychologic sequelae of intensive care unit stress, and support homeostasis. Although a wide variety of agents have been used empirically, the recognition of analgesia, amnesia, and hypnosis as discrete elements comprising the sedated state has facilitated an individualized approach to therapy. Because intensive care unit patients are a highly heterogeneous population with varying levels of end-organ compromise, the development of specific, easily titratable, parenteral agents has made intensive care unit sedation safer. A trend toward refining dosage regimens in order to minimize the total dose of drug administered and to reduce the occurrence of residual sedation is driven by utilization and cost concerns. The capability for simple bedside electrophysiologic monitoring of the level of sedation is expected to improve the ability to provide optimal therapy.

[Middle latency auditory evoked potentials in critical care children: preliminary study]

BACKGROUND

Middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) reflect changes in electroencephalogram waves after an auditory signal and represent the earliest cortical response to acoustic stimulus. They are therefore used to measure variations in the level of consciousness. MLEAP have been used to measure the depth of anesthesia during surgical procedures, but experience in critical care patients is very limited.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the utility of MLAEP for monitoring the level of sedation in critically ill children.

METHODS

Level of consciousness was monitored through MLAEP by placing special headphones and three sensors situated in the frontal and preauricular regions. Simultaneously, the level of sedation was measured using the COMFORT scale and the Bispectral Index (BIS) in distinct clinical situations.

RESULTS

We studied six critically ill children in whom MLAEP helped us to evaluate the level of consciousness: light sedation, natural sleep, deep sedation, sedation in a paralyzed child, and brain death. MLAEP showed a good correlation with the COMFORT scale and BIS in light and deep sedation and were effective in the early detection of brain death in one patient. In the paralyzed patient, MLAEP was able to detect undersedation. In one patient, a pacemaker interfered with the MLAEP signal.

CONCLUSIONS

MLAEP can be useful in evaluating the level of consciousness and sedation in critically ill children. Further studies with larger samples are required to analyze the limitations and reproducibility of this type of monitoring in children of different ages.

Identification and management of delirium in the critically ill patient with cancer

Rather than a specific entity, delirium is at the midpoint on a spectrum of potential mental status changes that ranges from full consciousness to deep coma. The extremes are relatively easy to recognize, but other points along the spectrum may go unrecognized or be misdiagnosed. If recognized and treated expeditiously, delirium may be reversed in some patients. It is imperative that those caring for critically ill patients with cancer have the knowledge and tools necessary to identify and manage delirium appropriately. Although all critically ill patients are at risk for delirium, cancer presents additional assaults to the central nervous system via direct tumor invasion or iatrogenic provocations. This article describes delirium in cancer, and addresses diagnostic and management issues across the course of the disease.

Pediatric sedation for procedures titrated to a desired degree of immobility results in unpredictable depth of sedation

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the need to attain immobility during pediatric sedation for procedures determines the depth of sedation, which cannot always be predicted.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of sedation documents of 301 consecutive sedations of pediatric patients undergoing various procedures

SETTING

Division of Critical Care sedation service within a children's hospital.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The medical records and sedation forms of our most recent 301 consecutive sedations were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the data gathered, the patients were categorized according to their achieved level of immobility, their level of consciousness according to the definitions of the American Academy of Pediatrics, the procedures for which sedation was administered, and the sedatives used. A total of 125 males and 89 females received 301 sedations. Their ages ranged from 22 days to 29 years (mean 7 y + 6 y). We recognized four categories of immobility for procedures. In category 1, some motion was allowed during painless and noninvasive procedures to the extent that it did not risk the patient nor hinder the successful performance of the procedures. In category 2, the patients were kept motionless during painless and noninvasive procedures. In category 3, the patients were kept motionless during painful and invasive procedures with the addition of local anesthetic. In category 4, the patients remained motionless throughout their painful or invasive procedure without the use of local anesthetics. There were 32, 10, 156 and 103 sedations in each category, respectively. Conscious sedation (CS) was observed in six sedations (19%) in category 1 of immobility; it was observed in none (0%) in category 2, in 4 sedations (2.6%) in category 3, and in 1 sedation (1%) in category 4. Deep sedation (DS) was noted in 26 category 1 sedations (81%), in 10 category 2 sedations (100%), in 136 category 3 sedations (87%), and in 63 category 4 sedations (61%). General anesthesia (GA) was only observed in categories 3 and 4 in 16 sedations (10%) and 39 sedations (38%), respectively. Intravenous (IV) ketamine, as a single agent or in combination with other agents, was the most frequently used sedative (88%) followed by IV benzodiazepines (64%), propofol (39%), opiates (15%), and barbiturates (5%). A total of 59 (19%) adverse events were encountered during the 301 sedations. In categories 1 and 2, no adverse event (0%) was encountered. In category 3, 19 adverse events took place (32%), and 40 adverse events (68%) (P< 0.05) occurred in category 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric sedation results in 4 categories of immobility. Complete immobility during painful and invasive procedures is associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. The depth of sedation (ie, CS, DS, or GA) required to achieve each category of immobility is unpredictable and varies from patient to patient. Thus, granting a limited sedation authority (conscious sedation only) to physicians may be of limited practical value.

Agitation

Agitation is a frequent clinical problem that adds significant morbidity to the hospital course. Agitation is usually part of an ambiguous constellation of cognitive and psychiatric symptoms, with a fluctuating clinical course. Observation of vastly different symptoms occurring at different times leads to misdiagnosis or underrecognition of serious underlying disorders. The most common causes of agitation include delirium, dementia, and acute psychosis. Risk factors attributable to hospitalization include pain, anxiety, and stressors endemic to intensive care. Agitated states may have multiple causes, and each potential contributor must be pursued and treated independently. Definitive diagnosis is dependent on a comprehensive history, patient observation, physical examination, and selective diagnostic studies.