Hypovolemic Shock

Evolutionary Unmasking Resuscitative Therapeutics Potential of Centhaquin Citrate in Hypovolemic Shock

Hypovolemic shock (HS), a clinical condition of insufficient blood perfusion and oxygenation in body tissues, is associated with immense morbidity and mortality. Treatment approaches include fluid replacement and surgical repair of reversible causes of hemorrhage; however, they cause irreversible blood perfusion loss, systemic inflammation, multiple organ failure, and death. Centhaquin citrate (CC) is an innovative centrally acting cardiovascular active agent that is initially intended as an antihypertensive drug. However, due to its positive ionotropic effect, Centhaquin citrate is being tested clinically as a resuscitative agent for the management of hypovolemic shock It acts at the α2B-adrenergic receptor to produce venous constriction followed by an increase in venous return to the heart. These actions are assumed to be capable of resuscitative activity observed by centhaquin citrate, through an increase in cardiac output and tissue perfusion. Pharmacokinetics investigations in animals and humans have shown that centhaquin citrate is well tolerated and has insignificant side effects. Therefore, centhaquin citrate seems to be a promising entity and gaining the interest of researchers to develop it as a resuscitative agent in HS. The review gives insight into the development of centhaquin citrate as a resuscitative agent and provides insight into the associated mechanism of action and molecular signalling to foster future research on CC for its clinical use in HS.

Persistent inflammation and anemia among critically ill septic patients

BACKGROUND

Associations among inflammatory cytokines, erythropoietin (EPO), and anemia in critically ill septic patients remain unclear. This study tested the hypothesis that elevated inflammatory cytokines and decreased EPO would be associated with iron-restricted anemia while accounting for operative blood loss, phlebotomy blood loss, and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume.

METHODS

Prospective observational cohort study of 42 critically ill septic patients was conducted. Hemoglobin (Hb) at sepsis onset and hospital discharge were used to calculate ΔHb. Operative blood loss, phlebotomy blood loss, and RBC transfusion volume were used to calculate adjusted ΔHb (AdjΔHb) assuming that 300 mL RBC is equal to 1 g/dL Hb. Patients with AdjΔHb of greater than 0 (positive AdjΔHb, n = 18) were compared with patients with AdjΔHb of less than or equal to 0 (negative AdjΔHb, n = 24).

RESULTS

Plasma tumor necrosis factor α, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, EPO, erythrocyte mean corpuscular volume, and serum transferrin receptor were measured on days 0, 1, 4, 7, and 14. Patients with negative AdjΔHb had significantly higher day 14 levels of IL-6 (37.4 vs. 15.2 pg/mL, p < 0.05), IL-8 (39.1 vs. 18.2 pg/mL, p = 0.01), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (101.3 vs. 60.5 pg/mL, p = 0.01), but not EPO. On linear regression analysis, lower AdjΔHb was associated with higher day 14 levels of IL-6 (r = 0.22, p < 0.01), IL-8 (r = 0.10, p = 0.04), stromal cell-derived factor 1 (r = 0.14, p = 0.02), and tumor necrosis factor α (r = 0.13, p = 0.02), but not EPO. Patients with negative AdjΔHb had significantly lower mean corpuscular volume on days 4 (89.6 vs. 93.2 fL/cell, p = 0.04), 7 (92.3 vs. 94.9 fL/cell, p = 0.04), and 14 (92.1 vs. 96.0 fL/cell, p = 0.03) but similar serum transferrin receptor levels.

CONCLUSION

Persistent elevation of inflammatory cytokines was associated with iron-restricted anemia among critically ill septic patients, occurring in the absence of systemic iron deficiency, independent of endogenous EPO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, level II.

No. 115-Hemorrhagic Shock

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical aspects of hemorrhagic shock and provide recommendations for therapy.

OPTIONS

Early recognition of hemorrhagic shock and prompt systematic intervention will help avoid poor outcomes.

OUTCOMES

Establish guidelines to assist in early recognition of hemorrhagic shock and to conduct resuscitation in an organized and evidence-based manner.

EVIDENCE

Medline references were sought using the MeSH term "hemorrhagic shock." All articles published in the disciplines of obstetrics and gynaecology, surgery, trauma, critical care, anesthesia, pharmacology, and hemotology between 1 January 1990 and 31 August 2000 were reviewed, as well as core textbooks from these fields. Selected references from these articles and book chapters were also obtained and reviewed. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

VALIDATION

These guidelines have been reviewed by the Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee and approved by Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

SPONSORS

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The effects of beta blockade and clonidine on persistent injury-associated anemia

BACKGROUND

Nonselective beta blockade (BB) and clonidine may abrogate catecholamine-mediated persistent injury-associated anemia. We hypothesized that critically ill trauma patients who received BB or clonidine would have favorable hemoglobin (Hb) trends when adjusting for operative blood loss (OBL), phlebotomy blood loss (PBL), and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volumes, and that the effect would be greatest among the elderly, who have higher catecholamine levels.

METHODS

We performed a 4-y retrospective cohort analysis of 280 consecutive trauma patients with ICU stay ≥48 h and moderate/severe anemia. Patients who received BB or clonidine for ≥25% of their hospital stay were grouped as the BB/clonidine cohort (n = 84); all other patients served as controls (n = 196). Admission and discharge Hb were used to calculate ΔHb. OBL, PBL, and RBC volume were used to calculate adjusted ΔHb assuming 300 mL RBC = 1 g/dL Hb.

RESULTS

BB/clonidine and control patients had similar age, injury severity, comorbid illness, and admission Hb. BB/clonidine patients received fewer RBCs despite greater OBL, though neither association was statistically significant. BB/clonidine patients had higher discharge Hb (9.9 versus 9.5, P = 0.029) and adjusted ΔHb (+1.0 versus -0.8, P = 0.003). Hb curves separated after hospital day 10. The difference in adjusted ΔHb between groups increased with advanced age (all patients: 1.7, ≥50 y: 1.8, ≥60 y: 2.4, ≥70 y: 3.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill trauma patients receiving BB or clonidine had favorable Hb trends when accounting for OBL, PBL, and RBC transfusions. These findings support the hypothesis that BB and clonidine alleviate persistent injury-associated anemia, with strongest effects among the elderly.

Analysis of Morbidity in Liver Transplant Recipients following Human Albumin Supplementation: A Retrospective Pilot Study

Objectives

To assess incidence of morbidity (ie, documented infection, acute renal failure, acute graft rejection, acute cardiovascular events, and hospital read-mission rates) 6 months following liver transplantation using linear regression as a function of cumulative albumin dose.

Design

Retrospective chart review.

Setting

A 473-bed tertiary care teaching facility with a solid-organ transplantation center.

Patients

Forty liver transplant recipients examined from January 1 to December 31, 2003.

Measurements and Results

Data from 40 liver transplant recipients were collected. Mean albumin dose administered was 190.9 ± 162.3 g. No statistical differences were identified in patients receiving less than 140 g (n = 20) or more than 140 g (n = 20) with respect to demographic data other than gender and ethnicity. The mean APACHE III (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health) score was 69.7 ± 24.3. Approximately 70 episodes of morbidity and 23 readmissions were observed. Regardless of the APACHE III score, albumin was associated with increased overall morbidity and cardiovascular complications. Liver transplant recipients receiving more than 140 g had a longer hospital stay (14 vs 8 days, P = .025) and intensive care unit stay (6 vs 3 days, P = .051) than patients receiving 140 g or less. No correlation with risk of acute rejection was seen with albumin or tacrolimus.

Conclusion

Albumin supplementation among liver transplant recipients was associated with a significant risk for cardiovascular complications and overall number of complications regardless of APACHE III score. Future prospective studies are needed to further define the potential risk for complications in this patient population.

Use of albumin in intensive care unit patients--is continuous quality assessment necessary?

BACKGROUND

There are two main reasons for hypo-albuminaemia in severely ill patients: long-lasting malnutrition and metabolic response to stress. Hypo-albuminaemia is therefore a prognostic indicator of illness severity rather than a cause of disease. Supplementation with albumin has not yet been demonstrated to have measurable therapeutic effects. Hypovolaemia is often seen in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, either postoperatively or caused through shock. The main goal of any treatment is to maintain adequate intravascular filling. No clear benefit can be seen when using albumin instead of artificial colloids.

OBJECTIVE

Based on the literature, we performed an intervention study to evaluate and improve the use of albumin.

METHOD

After evaluation of the use of albumin over the last 4 years (by means of analysis of the pharmacy drug use statistics), all staff members of the ICU were invited to discuss information retrieved from recently published literature. This led to the introduction of the following new guidelines. Albumin may only be given to patients with very low serum albumin levels of less than 15 g/litre. Substitution of albumin between levels of 15-20 g/litre may take place if patients are in poor condition. The indication has to be documented in the patient's notes.

RESULTS

After the introduction of the guidelines, the use of albumin dropped by more than 50% from 3178 units in 1996 to 1565 units in 1997. This led to direct cost savings of approximately US$100000.

CONCLUSION

The available literature about the risks and benefits of using albumin in clinical practice is not conclusive. The use of albumin should therefore be restricted according to the guidelines.