Prostaglandins, Cyclo-oxygenase Inhibitors, and Thromboxane Synthetase Inhibitors in the Pathogenesis of Multiple Systems Organ Failure

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS): where did it come from and is it still relevant today?

The concept of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to describe the complex pathophysiologic response to an insult such as infection, trauma, burns, pancreatitis, or a variety of other injuries came from a 1991 consensus conference charged with the task of developing an easy-to-apply set of clinical parameters to aid in the early identification of potential candidates to enter into clinical trials to evaluate new treatments for sepsis. There was recognition that a diverse group of injuries produced a common inflammatory response in the host and provided attractive targets for new anti-inflammatory molecules designed to prevent further propagation and/or provide specific treatment. Effective application of these new anti-inflammatory strategies necessitated identification of early clinical markers that could be assessed in real-time and were likely to define a population of patients that would have a beneficial response to the targeted intervention. It was felt that early clinical manifestations might be more readily available to clinicians than more sophisticated and specific assays for inflammatory substances that were systemically released by the network of injurious inflammatory events. Therefore, the early definition of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) was built upon a foundation of basic clinical and laboratory abnormalities that were readily available in almost all clinical settings. With further refinement, it was hoped, that this definition would have a high degree of sensitivity, coupled with a reasonable degree of specificity. This manuscript reviews the derivation, application, utilization, potential benefits, and speculation regarding the future of the SIRS definition.

Fish oil in critical illness: mechanisms and clinical applications

Fish oil is rich in omega-3 fatty acids, which have been shown to be beneficial in multiple disease states that involve an inflammatory process. It is now hypothesized that omega-3 fatty acids may decrease the inflammatory response and be beneficial in critical illness. After a review of the mechanisms of omega-3 fatty acids in inflammation, research using enteral nutrition formulas and parenteral nutrition lipid emulsions fortified with fish oil were examined. The results of this research to date are inconclusive for both enteral and parenteral omega-3 fatty acid administration. More research is required before definitive recommendations can be made on fish oil supplementation in critical illness.

Omega-3 fatty acids in critical illness

Supplementation of enteral nutritional formulas and parenteral nutrition lipid emulsions with omega-3 fatty acids is a recent area of research in patients with critical illness. It is hypothesized that omega-3 fatty acids may help reduce inflammation in critically ill patients, particularly those with sepsis and acute lung injury. The objective of this article is to review the data on supplementing omega-3 fatty acids during critical illness; enteral and parenteral supplemental nutrition are reviewed separately. The results of the research available to date are contradictory for both enteral and parenteral omega-3 fatty acid administration. Supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids may influence the acute inflammatory response in critically ill patients, but more research is needed before definitive recommendations about the routine use of omega-3 fatty acids in caring for critically ill patients can be made.

The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators

Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells.

IMPLICATIONS

Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.

Phospholipase A(2) and cyclooxygenase gene expression in human preimplantation embryos

Phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) and cyclooxygenase (COX) are two key enzymes in PG synthesis; the latter has two forms, COX-1 and COX-2. mRNA was extracted from single preimplantation embryos and examined for PLA(2), COX-1, and COX-2 gene expression by RT-PCR to investigate whether PLA(2) and COX genes are expressed in human preimplantation conceptuses from zygote to blastocyst stage and to compare COX-1 and COX-2 gene expression within the same stage of embryonic development. Expression of PLA(2), COX-1, and COX-2 was detected in 48, 37, and 45%, respectively, of total embryos examined. COX-1 was expressed in approximately 66% of early human preimplantation embryos from zygote to two-cell stage, whereas COX-2 was expressed in about 58% of later stage embryos from eight-cell to blastocyst stage (P < 0.05). Furthermore, COX-2 mRNA and protein were localized to trophectoderm in blastocyst stage embryos. In conclusion, PLA(2), COX-1, and COX-2 are expressed during early human embryonic development and may contribute to the production of PGs such as PGE(2) in human embryogenesis. COX-1 and COX-2 are differentially expressed, with COX-2 being primarily expressed by trophectoderm in late-stage human preimplantation embryos, which may promote embryonic differentiation and implantation.

Cytokines and inflammatory pathways in the pathogenesis of multiple organ failure following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Multiple organ failure is a common mode of death following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, particularly after rupture. Cytokines are the principal mediators of the inflammatory response to injury and high levels of circulating cytokines have been associated with poor outcome in major trauma and sepsis. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair results in an ischaemia-reperfusion injury to the tissues distal to the site of aortic clamping. The inflammatory response in these tissues causes the release of cytokines, principally Interleukins 1-beta, 6, and 8, and Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha. If released in large enough concentrations, these cytokines may enter the circulation and gain access to organs distant to the site of initial injury. Circulating cytokines cause dysfunction of the renal, cardiovascular, respiratory, nervous and musculo-skeletal systems. The combination of these individual changes in organ function is the multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome, which may progress to multiple organ failure.

Lazaroid and pentoxifylline suppress sepsis-induced increases in renal vascular resistance via altered arachidonic acid metabolism

Early sepsis leads to renal hypoperfusion, despite a hyperdynamic systemic circulation. It is thought that failure of local control of the renal microcirculation leads to hypoperfusion and organ dysfunction. Of the many mediators implicated in the pathogenesis of microvascular vasoconstriction, arachidonic acid metabolites are thought to be important. Vasoconstriction may be due to excess production of vasoconstrictors or loss of vasodilators. Using the isolated perfused kidney model, we describe a sepsis-induced rise in renal vascular resistance and increased production of key arachidonic acid metabolites, both vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, suggesting excessive production of vasoconstrictors as a cause for microcirculatory hypoperfusion. There is evidence of increased enzymatic production of arachidonic acid metabolites as well as nonenzymatic, free radical, catalyzed conversion of arachidonic acid. Pentoxifylline (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and U74389G (an antioxidant) both have a protective effect on the renal microcirculation during sepsis. Both drugs appear to alter the renal microvascular response to sepsis by altering renal arachidonic acid metabolism. This study demonstrates that sepsis leads to increased renal vascular resistance. This response is in part mediated by metabolites produced by metabolism of arachidonic acid within the kidney. The ability of drugs to modulate arachidonic acid metabolism and so alter the renal response to sepsis suggests a possible role for these agents in protecting the renal microcirculation during sepsis.

Lipid mediators in the pathophysiology of critical illness

Inflammatory lipid mediators are produced by the metabolism of membrane phospholipids following a number of different stimuli. These mediators lead to a variety of cellular and systemic responses which contribute to the manifestations of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome in the critically ill patient. These mediators include platelet-activating factor and the eicosanoids, including prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes, and HETEs. This review seeks to evaluate the current role of these mediators in the pathophysiology of critical illness. We will focus on recent studies concerning the modulation of these pathways as a potential therapeutic strategy for management of these critically ill patients. This includes the gamut from nutritional strategies to alter the cellular membrane lipid composition, thereby effecting the substrate available to produce these lipid byproducts, to intracellular inhibitors to alter production of these mediators, to receptor blockage and enhanced clearance to inhibit their effects.

Elevated cytosolic phospholipase A2 expression and activity in human neutrophils during sepsis

Sepsis is defined as the systemic inflammatory response to infection. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) plays an important role in inflammation processes by initiating the production of inflammatory mediators. The role of cytosolic PLA (cPLA2) has not yet been identified in inflammatory and infectious disease clinical settings. The aim of the present research was to determine whether cPLA2 activity has a role during sepsis. Since neutrophil activation has been documented during sepsis, these cells were chosen as a model to evaluate the function of cPLA2 in this clinical setting. cPLA2 was studied at 3 levels: activity, protein expression, and messenger RNA (mRNA). Neutrophils from 32 septic patients with and without bacteremia were examined. cPLA2 activity was measured using labeled phosphatidyl choline vesicles as a substrate, and total PLA2 was determined by the release of labeled arachidonic acid from prelabeled cells. A significant increase in cPLA2activity, protein expression, and total PLA2 activity in neutrophils was detected during sepsis. mRNA levels, detected by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction, were significantly higher during sepsis, indicating that the increase in the amount of cPLA2 is regulated on the mRNA level. The significant elevation of cPLA2 activity and expression in neutrophils during sepsis suggests that this enzyme plays a major role in neutrophil function in this clinical setting.

The endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, in combination with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac, counteracts pulmonary hypertension in porcine endotoxin shock

OBJECTIVE

To prevent endotoxin-induced pulmonary hypertension in the pig with a combination of a nonpeptide mixed endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, and a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, diclofenac.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled trial.

SETTING

Animal laboratory at a large university medical center.

SUBJECTS

Twelve domestic pigs, weighing 17.5 to 27 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

Endotoxin shock was induced by intravenous infusion of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide endotoxin (15 micrograms/kg/hr). Six pigs receiving only endotoxin served as controls. Six pigs were pretreated with intravenous bolus injections of bosentan (5 mg/kg) and diclofenac (3 mg/kg) followed by a continuous bosentan infusion (2.5 mg/kg/hr).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic hemodynamics and regional circulation were measured using ultrasonic flow probes. Arterial and mixed venous blood samples were collected regularty for determination of Big endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity, endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity, norepinephrine, and blood gases. The bosentan/diclofenac pretreatment per se significantly decreased mean pulmonary arterial pressure (p < .001), pulmonary vascular resistance index (p < .001), and mean arterial blood pressure (p < .001), but cardiac index did not change. Splenic blood flow increased (p < .01) while renal blood flow decreased (p < .001). In addition, intestinal blood flow decreased slightly (p < .05). In the control group, only three animals survived the 3 hrs of endotoxin infusion, while all pretreated animals survived. The biphasic increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance index seen in control animals during endotoxemia was markedly attenuated in animals pretreated with the bosentan/diclofenac combination. The pretreated group generally showed a favorable hemodynamic course, with a relatively higher cardiac index, stroke volume index, and splenic and renal blood flow. In control animals, a pronounced metabolic acidosis developed during endotoxin infusion. A relatively higher arterial plasma concentration of endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity was reached in pretreated animals, while the Big endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity plasma increase was similar in both groups. Arterial concentrations of norepinephrine were significantly (p < .01) higher in control animals when compared with diclofenac/bosentan-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of bosentan and diclofenac induced systemic and pulmonary vasodilation in the intrinsic state. During endotoxin shock, this drug combination efficiently counteracts pulmonary hypertension and improves cardiac performance and splenic and renal blood flow. These favorable circulatory effects may have resulted in a reduction of both sympathetic nervous system activation and metabolic acidosis. Thus, we conclude that the endothelin receptors participate in intrinsic regulation of vascular tone in the anesthetized pig. During endotoxin shock, blockade of these receptors, as well as inhibition of the cyclooxygenase enzymes, contributes to a less adverse effect on the systemic and pulmonary circulation.

The immune system: relation to sepsis and multiple organ failure

The immune system plays a dual role in the pathogenesis of sepsis and organ failure, intended for host defense but also possessing significant cytodestructive capacity. As the understanding of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of these disorders improves, so too does the appreciation for the complexity of this system. No longer is the immune response viewed as simply cellular or humoral but rather as a network of cells, chemical mediators, and molecular elements. The interactions between these various components serve to regulate and coordinate the inflammatory response. When this fine balance is lost, the inflammatory response becomes pathologic and self-destructive. Organ injury ensues, and with this injury, further escalation of the inflammatory response occurs; becoming a self-perpetuating process. Conventional therapy is limited to supportive care and has been ineffective in improving mortality. To date, efforts to modulate the inflammatory response by inhibition of specific components have been unsuccessful. In the future, better patient selection, combination therapy (perhaps using strategies of early augmentation followed by inhibition), and alternative techniques such as blood purification may prove to be more effective.

Early detection and markers of sepsis

In vitro and animal models of sepsis have provided a template for studies of the pathogenesis of sepsis in patients at risk for and with the syndrome. Numerous potential markers have been identified in these models and then looked for in patients. No single marker or combination of markers convincingly identifies sepsis, predicts the development of sepsis, predicts the development of complications of sepsis, or predicts mortality. As discussed, the clinical studies have been complicated by many confounding variables, including the lack of adherence to rigorous definitions, differences in assay methods, differences in timing of the studies, and differences in outcome variables analyzed. In spite of the limitations, the studies have been critical in helping determine the pathogenesis of sepsis in humans. As new mediators and modulators of inflammation are identified, it will be important to study their role as markers, individually and in combination, in human disease.

Secretory non-pancreatic phopholipase A2 in severe sepsis: relation to endotoxin, cytokines and thromboxane B2

Circulatory secretory non-pancreatic phospholipase A2 (snp-PLA2) was measured prospectively at the onset (day 0) of severe sepsis in 52 patients as well as on day 1 and 2 in 25 patients, in order to answer two questions: 1) does the snp-PLA2 plasma concentration differ according to the type and severity of infection? 2) what is the relation between snp-PLA2 and other mediators involved in severe sepsis, such as endotoxin, cytokines (TNF alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6) and thromboxane B2 (the stable metabolite of thromboxane A2)? On day 0, the snp-PLA2 circulatory level was 78 +/- 17 nmol/min/ml in patients with severe sepsis as compared to 3.5 +/- 2 nmol/min/ml in 40 healthy volunteers. There was no statistical difference according to the outcome, the presence of shock, or the type of infection on day 0. However, snp-PLA2 remained elevated or even increased in patients who ultimately died, while it decreased in survivors (p = 0.01 by ANOVA). The cytokine profiles during the 2-day follow-up were similar to that of snp-PLA2, but the differences were not statistically significant between survivors and non-survivors. No correlation was found between snp-PLA2 and other mediators for either initial or peak values.

Case history: traumatic adult respiratory distress syndrome--a multisystem approach

In spite of advances in the care of traumatically injured patients, management of adult respiratory distress syndrome has continued to challenge clinicians since it was first described. Recently the alveolar macrophage, which elaborates proinflammatory mediators, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury and eventually in a clinical picture of adult respiratory distress syndrome. This case history presents the use of experimental methods of treatment, including chemical mediator inhibitors, continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration, and pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation.

Immunotherapy in the management of sepsis

The pathophysiological effects of severe sepsis, septic shock and related syndromes result from tissues damaged by the uncontrolled production of the mediators of inflammation. Early deaths are related primarily to the acute effects of the systemic inflammatory response. Later deaths are related more closely to the consequences of multiple organ dysfunction. Monoclonal antibodies and other immunotherapies have been developed against bacterial products, cytokines and other mediators involved in this systemic inflammatory response. Immunotherapies may improve outcome in the critically ill with sepsis if used early and as part of the therapeutic regimen of antimicrobial agents and intensive care support.

Inhibitory effects of diclofenac on the endotoxin shock response in relation to endothelin turnover in the pig

During sepsis vasoactive arachidonic acid metabolites of the cyclo-oxygenase pathway and the endothelium-derived vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) are released. The effects of cyclo-oxygenase pathway inhibition by diclofenac on the endotoxin shock response and ET-1 turnover, were investigated in five groups of pigs. In the first group (n = 7; controls) endotoxin (15 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 i.v.) was infused for two hours. In a second endotoxin group (n = 7), the animals were pretreated with diclofenac (3 mg.kg-1 i.v.). In a third group (n = 7), high-dose ET-1 was infused (20 pmol.kg-1.min-1 i.v.) and in a fourth group (n = 7), the ET-1 infusion was preceded by diclofenac. In a fifth group (n = 4), a low and intermediate dose of ET-1 (0.2 and 4 pmol.kg-1.min-1) was infused. A significant increase in ET-1-like immunoreactivity (LI) plasma levels was observed in both endotoxin groups, but in the diclofenac group the increase was comparatively delayed. Furthermore, this group showed a more stable haemodynamic course and in the biphasic increase of pulmonary vascular resistance seen in endotoxin controls, the initial peak was abolished by diclofenac. Exogenous ET-1 infusion indicated that not only locally released but possibly also circulating ET-1 could be a mediator of vascular responses to endotoxin. Indications of release from the lungs were seen during endotoxin infusion. Diclofenac had no effect on basal ET-1-LI plasma levels or on the disappearance rate from plasma of ET-1-LI and the haemodynamic changes seen on ET-1 infusion. The inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase pathway by diclofenac resulted in prevention of the initial pulmonary hypertension and a delayed increase in plasma ET-1-LI levels in porcine endotoxin shock and this latter effect is not due to an increased rate of disappearance from plasma but rather to a decreased release of ET-1.

Biological response modifiers and infectious diseases: actual and potential therapeutic agents

Biological response modifiers (BRMs) are agents which can modify the immune response to cancer or invasion of the organism by infectious agents. An explosive appearance of new BRMs has resulted from the development of recombinant gene technology and the availability of monoclonal antibodies. Colony-stimulating factors first became available for the prevention of neutropenia but may also have a role in the treatment of infections. Interleukin-1 is being tested as a modular of hematopoiesis and may be useful as a helper factor for T- and B-cell function. Immunoglobulins are being used against viral and bacterial infections while interferons can prevent viral upper respiratory infections and suppress or irradicate some viral hepatitides. Other BRMs which show promise include chemical agents and traditional herbal medicines.

Recent developments in our understanding of sepsis: evaluation of anti-endotoxin antibodies and biological response modifiers

Sepsis and septic shock are among the most frequent life-threatening infectious disease problems encountered in emergency medicine practice. This review summarizes the extensive research into the pathophysiology of sepsis, with emphasis on Gram-negative infection. Particular reference is given to the exogenous and endogenous mediators involved in the sepsis cascade. It also critically evaluates new preparations developed to blunt the actions of the exogenous and endogenous mediators responsible for the clinical manifestations comprising this syndrome. Clinical signs likely to be associated with Gram-negative infection are also reviewed, and guidelines are considered for the potential use of newly developed anti-endotoxin antibodies and other biological response modifiers in the treatment of patients with Gram-negative sepsis.

Septic shock: pathogenesis and treatment

Septic shock is the host's inflammatory response to infection. There are multiple endogenous mediators responsible for the pathogenesis of septic shock. Cytokines, nitric oxide and prostaglandins are some of the major mediators. The term sepsis syndrome allows for an earlier diagnosis and treatment. Management of septic shock is focused in maintaining hemodynamic stability and an adequate oxygen delivery and utilization. Careful attention to each organ-system is of paramount importance to prevent complications and improve outcome. Experimental therapies to modulate the inflammatory response are promising.

Perspectives for the future

The pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock is extremely complex and ultimately involves every physiological pathway. The initiating event is the entrance of endotoxin or similar substances into the blood which initiates the release of multiple mediators. These are designed to react locally and to protect the organism. Their constant release, however, sets in motion up- and down regulations, ultimately resulting in "metabolic anarchy". Tumor necrosis factor alpha and other cytokines trigger several systems, especially coagulation to yield DIC, and the complement system. Many treatment modalities have been developed, most recently those which substitute inhibitors of various systems. Antithrombin III concentrates and potentially protein C concentrates are designed to arrest DIC. C1-esterase inhibitor concentrates should intercept the activation of the complement system and the contact phase of coagulation and its relationship to kinin generation. Even newer approaches entail antibodies to tumor necrosis factor alpha or endotoxin itself. The complex process of sepsis will undoubtedly require a multifaceted therapeutic approach.