Nosocomial Pneumonia

Aspiration pneumonia: a review of modern trends

PURPOSE

The purpose was to describe aspiration pneumonia in the context of other lung infections and aspiration syndromes and to distinguish between the main scenarios commonly implied when the terms aspiration or aspiration pneumonia are used. Finally, we aim to summarize current evidence surrounding the diagnosis, microbiology, treatment, risks, and prevention of aspiration pneumonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline was searched from inception to November 2013. All descriptive or experimental studies that added to the understanding of aspiration pneumonia were reviewed. All studies that provided insight into the clinical aspiration syndromes, historical context, diagnosis, microbiology, risk factors, prevention, and treatment were summarized within the text.

RESULTS

Despite the original teaching, aspiration pneumonia is difficult to distinguish from other pneumonia syndromes. The microbiology of pneumonia after a macroaspiration has changed over the last 60 years from an anaerobic infection to one of aerobic and nosocomial bacteria. Successful antibiotic therapy has been achieved with several antibiotics. Various risks for aspiration have been described leading to several proposed preventative measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspiration pneumonia is a disease with a distinct pathophysiology. In the modern era, aspiration pneumonia is rarely solely an anaerobic infection. Antibiotic treatment is largely dependent on the clinical scenario. Several measures may help prevent aspiration pneumonia.

Use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiologic tool during an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections in an intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the use of DNA polymorphism analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) in assessing the rate of exogenous contamination during an outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections in an intensive care unit ICU. Another goal was to determine the risk factors, involved in the outbreak.

DESIGN

Rectal swabs and tracheal secretions were cultured from all patients upon admission and thereafter once a week throughout their stay in the ICU. Resistance patterns were determined in all P. aeruginosa isolates. We determined the serotypes, pyocin types, plasmid profiles and total DNA macrorestriction patterns for isolates. The restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of Dra I total DNA digest was studied by PFGE. A retrospective case-control study was performed to determine the risk factors for P. aeruginosa bronchopulmonary colonization.

SETTING

The study was carried out in the medical ICU of Besancon University Hospital (France).

RESULTS

The typability, stability and reproducibility of phenotypic markers were not completely satisfactory. Only the RFLP profile satisfied all the criteria for a good typing technique. In four of the 17 patients, P. aeruginosa strains with the same DNA pattern were found. Among the previously reported risk factors for hospital-acquired bronchopulmonary infections, only invasive procedures were determined by multivariate analysis to be significant in our study group. The oropharynx and the bronchial tract are the most likely endogenous sources.

CONCLUSION

PFGE-RFLP is a valuable tool for the epidemiologic study of P. aeruginosa. This typing method revealed that exogenous contamination is not always the major source of P. aeruginosa lung infections in mechanically ventilated patients in ICUs.

Bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia. A 7-year experience in one institution

STUDY OBJECT

To describe the epidemiology, microbiology, and outcome of nosocomial pneumonia with secondary bloodstream infection.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care Canadian teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Inpatients.

MEASUREMENT

All inpatient blood cultures were concurrently monitored over an 89 month period. Following chart review, patients experiencing nosocomial bloodstream infection due to pneumonia were identified. A standardized definition of pneumonia was used.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-nine episodes occurred in 145 patients, 0.66/1,000 hospital admissions, 8.4% of all nosocomial bloodstream infections. No change in rate occurred in the study period. Fifty-four percent of episodes developed in one of seven ICUs. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently identified etiologic organism (27%). The ICU and non-ICU cases did not differ in etiology. No organism became more prevalent during the study period. Twenty percent of patients died within 1 week of first positive culture; episodes associated with Pseudomonas species had a much higher mortality rate (45%) than other infections (14%) (p = 0.002). The ICU and non-ICU infections had a similar mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Pneumonia is an important cause of nosocomial bloodstream infection, but it is not increasing in frequency or changing in etiology in our institution. The ICUs are a major contributor to this problem but have the same case short-term mortality rate and microbial etiology as non-ICU cases. Cases associated with Pseudomonas have a much higher mortality rate.

A study of the etiologies and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in a community-based teaching hospital

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of the pathogens of nosocomial pneumonia in a community-based teaching hospital to the frequencies previously published, and to evaluate recommendations for the therapy of nosocomial pneumonia in this setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively acquired data accrued during 9 randomized single-blinded and 4 single-agent investigational antibiotic studies for the therapy of pneumonia in hospitalized patients between 1981 and 1989.

SETTING

The study was performed at a university affiliated, community-based teaching Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Patients were hospitalized on the acute medical/surgical and intermediate medicine wards. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrolling patients into the respective antimicrobial studies. Pneumonia was documented radiographically and clinically for each patient.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-one episodes of nosocomial pneumonia were treated. Overall, 51% of pneumonias were caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae or Hemophilus influenzae with or without other organisms that were not gram-negative bacilli. Gram-negative bacilli, with or without other organisms, accounted for only 26% of all nosocomial pneumonias. Overall, monotherapy with a cephalosporin (usually a broad-spectrum agent) was equally efficacious compared with combination therapy (87% versus 81%, respectively). Cure rates for nosocomial pneumonias from gram-negative bacilli treated with these 2 therapies also were similar (70% versus 60%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In nontertiary care settings, gram-negative bacilli may cause fewer episodes of nosocomial pneumonia (26% in this study) than noted by previously published reports, which indicated that these organisms account for 50% of nosocomial pneumonias. Further, S pneumoniae and H influenzae may account etiologically for many of these nosocomial pneumonias. Monotherapy with an extended-spectrum cephalosporin may be more appropriate than combined treatment with a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside in a nontertiary care setting, thereby reducing potential toxicity in an older, hospitalized patient population.

Handwashing and disinfection of heavily contaminated hands—effective or ineffective?

Hands are among the principal vehicles for transfer of nosocomial pathogens in hospitals. Often, outbreaks of infection are thought to be caused by a lack of compliance with handwashing guidelines, rather than due to the inadequacy of the handwashing agents used. In this study the effectiveness of proper handwashing and the use of three different hand disinfectants: ethanol 70% (E), isopropanol 40% (I) and alcoholic chlorhexidine (70%) (AC) was compared using three volunteers whose fingertips were heavily contaminated with a succession of bacteria including: Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae. After each contamination, thorough handwashing and application of one disinfectant on the hands were performed three times. Fingerprint-samples were taken before and 1 min after application of the disinfectants. Thorough handwashing with an ordinary liquid soap ('Sterisol') did not reduce the confluent growth of bacteria on fingertips for any of the species used (197 examinations). Only AC had a significant effect on fingers heavily contaminated with S. aureus (126 examinations; AC compared with E and I; P less than 0.0002 and P less than 0.0002 respectively), but did not completely eradicate the bacteria. After contamination with Ent. cloacae (118 examinations), none of the three agents were particularly effective, but E and AC seemed to be somewhat more effective than I (P less than 0.0002 and P less than 0.01 respectively). When successive contamination was performed using all bacterial species, AC was the most effective decontaminant. However, Ent. cloacae was still present on the fingertips after 15 repeated courses of handwashing and applications of disinfectants. Bathing of hands in AC for 20s completely eradicated all bacteria from the hands. The study demonstrates that, when heavily contaminated, an ordinary handwashing followed by disinfectants is not enough to eradicate potentially pathogenic bacteria from the hands.

Efficacy of a low dose of cefotaxime in serious chest infections

The optimal antibiotic dosage in serious chest infections is not established and commonly used regimens may well be excessive. We have compared the efficacy of a low dose of cefotaxime (2 g every 12 h) with a more usual dose (2 g every 8 h) in a prospective, randomized study of the treatment of chest infections in the seriously ill. Fifty intensive care unit patients received either regimen for five days. The two groups appeared demographically comparable. Clinical resolution occurred in 86 percent, no change occurred in 4 percent, and deterioration occurred in 10 percent. Microbiologic clearance occurred in 52 percent of those in whom a pathogen was isolated (46 percent of patients). There was no significant difference in clinical or microbiologic response between the two regimens. It is concluded that cefotaxime in a dose of 2 g twice daily is effective in the treatment of serious chest infections.