Field examination of the equine patient with nasal discharge

Clinical efficacy of bronchodilators in equine asthma: Looking for minimal important difference

BACKGROUND

Airway obstruction is the main trait of severe equine asthma that affects respiratory function and elicits detrimental effects on clinical presentation. Only few and underpowered clinical studies have investigated the impact of improvement in lung function induced by bronchodilators on the clinical signs of asthma-affected horses.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the minimal important difference (MID) in lung function elicited by bronchodilator leading to a meaningful improvement in clinical signs.

STUDY DESIGN

Pairwise meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed for studies that investigated the effect of bronchodilator therapy on lung function and clinical condition of asthmatic horses. The relationship between the change in lung function variables and clinical score was analysed via random-effect meta-regression. One-point change of the Improved clinically Detectable Equine Asthma Scoring System (IDEASS) score was used to identify the MID.

RESULTS

A significant (P<0.05) relationship was found between the changes in IDEASS score and maximum change in transpulmonary pressure (ΔPpl_max ) or pulmonary resistance (R_L ). Since only the model resulting for R_L passed through the origin (Y-intercept when X = 0: -0.31, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.14), this variable was used to identify the MID correlated with a meaningful improvement in clinical signs. The resulting MID value was a change in R_L of 0.63 cm H₂ O/L/s (95% CI 0.33-0.94), representing the slope of meta-regression model (high quality of evidence).

MAIN LIMITATIONS

No long-term studies investigated the effect of bronchodilator agents on both lung function and clinical signs in asthmatic horses.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, bronchodilator pharmacotherapy in equine asthma elicits clinically meaningful effect when R_L increases ≥1 cm H₂ O/L/s, a value indicating the MID. Assessing the MID based on change in R_L may improve the quality of evidence and the scientific impact of future clinical trials as it extends beyond the simple, and limiting, evaluation of statistical significance.

Cytological Examination of Secretions From the Paranasal Sinuses in Horses

The objective of this study was to determine whether the assessment of cytological features of secretions from the paranasal sinuses represents a useful diagnostic tool in equine sinusitis to distinguish between different etiologies. Secretion samples from 50 horses with sinusitis and 10 healthy horses were taken transendoscopically from the drainage angle of the nasomaxillary aperture using a Swing Tip catheter. An additional direct sample from the caudal maxillary sinus was taken from all healthy horses after trephination. A direct sample was obtained from the affected sinus in 19 diseased horses after osteotomy. Samples were smeared on microscope slides and dyed using "Pappenheim stain" for cytological evaluation. Smears from horses with sinusitis (primary n = 14, dental n = 28, cyst n = 2, progressive ethmoidal hematoma [PEH] n = 2, traumatic n = 2, malignant neoplasia n = 2) were dominated by moderate to high numbers of neutrophilic granulocytes and moderate numbers of different epithelial cells, whereas samples from healthy sinuses revealed almost exclusively epithelial cells. Smears in dental-related sinusitis tended to contain more lytic cellular material than in other conditions. Horses with dental sinusitis also showed a higher intracellular and extracellular bacterial burden than horses with other underlying etiologies and healthy horses. The absence of bacteria in light microscopy did not exclude the evidence of pathogenic bacteria from bacterial culture in every case. Case numbers were too small to evaluate the diagnostic value for neoplastic conditions or PEH. In conclusion, cytological examination of secretions from the paranasal sinuses can provide an additional but limited ancillary diagnostic value in equine sinusitis.

Clinical effect of corticosteroids in asthma-affected horses: A quantitative synthesis

BACKGROUND

There are limited findings from low-powered studies based on few number of subjects with equine asthma. Furthermore, no studies have been performed to assess a meaningful clinically detectable impact of corticosteroids in equine asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the clinical effect of inhaled and systemic corticosteroids in equine asthma and identify a quantitative clinical score suitable to assess the Minimal Important Difference (MID), expressed as the Minimally Clinically Detectable Difference (MCDD).

STUDY DESIGN

Pair-wise and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature searches for studies on corticosteroid therapy in equine asthma were performed. The risk of publication bias was assessed by Funnel plots and Egger's test. The effect on changes in clinical scores vs. control was analysed via random-effects models and Bayesian networks.

RESULTS

Corticosteroids significantly improved the clinical condition (Standardised Mean Difference: -1.52, 95% CrI -2.07 to -0.98; P<0.001 vs. control). No difference was detected between inhaled and systemic corticosteroids with regard to the changes in clinical scores (Relative Effect: 0.08, 95% CrI -1.45 to 1.32; P = 0.8). An Improved clinically Detectable Equine Asthma Scoring System (IDEASS) indicated that corticosteroids improved the clinical condition of asthmatic horses by 30% compared with controls (IDEASS value: -2.36, 95% CI -3.39 to -1.33; P<0.001). A one-point change in IDEASS represented the MCDD in equine asthma.

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Moderate quality of evidence for systemic corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in improving the clinical condition of horses with equine asthma and prevent exacerbations. Systemic corticosteroids should be used only in selected cases with symptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness during exacerbation. IDEASS requires further validation but may represent a suitable approach to rank the level of asthma severity and assess the clinical effect of pharmacotherapy in horses with equine asthma.