Failed meniscus repair

[Complications with all-inside devices used in reconstructive meniscal surgery]

All-inside devices have become increasingly popular in reconstructive meniscal surgery since their introduction at the beginning of the 1990s. Although the latest clinical investigations show better results for conventional suture techniques, meniscal devices are an important alternative because of the low risk of neurovascular injury and the easy handling of the instruments. Over the years, many reports on specific complications related to all-inside devices have been published. Especially chondral injuries, implant loosening, device migration and capsular or neural irritations have been described. Furthermore, some authors reported on foreign body reactions and cystic granulomas after the use of meniscal fixation devices. However, there is no evidence for a higher infection rate or for specific infections after the use of intra-articular techniques. Clinical reports on complications along with biomechanical studies on meniscal repair devices have led to the enhancement of all-inside techniques through substantial modifications of established products as well as to the development of new implants. After reviewing the latest literature, the complication rate seems to be decreasing. In many ways, all-inside devices are an interesting alternative to conventional suture techniques. A precise knowledge of their potential complications and the pitfalls during surgery however is crucial to make a risk evaluation in the choice of the right technique for meniscal reconstruction.

Complications in medial meniscus suture: a cadaveric study

The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of complications in medial meniscus repair using an inside-out suturing device. Anatomical cadaveric study. Six fresh frozen cadaveric lower limbs were used. The posterior horn of the medial meniscus was sutured using three vertical stitches. An anatomical dissection was subsequently performed to check for any possible effects upon the structures of the medial aspect of the knee. In addition, an incision was made in a safety zone in order to ascertain whether it was possible to carry out the suture without affecting the aforementioned structures. No vascular or nervous structures were pierced by the needle. On knotting, it was found that a number of different structures had become trapped: the sartorial tendon was affected in each of the specimens used. In four cases, the saphenous vein was trapped by some of the knots. The saphenous nerve was trapped in four instances. Once this had been established, a small accessory incision was made to provide access to a safety zone, where suture can be performed without affecting any neurovascular or tendinous structures. Inside-out suture of the posterior meniscal horn carries a high incidence of entrapment of the neurovascular structures of the medial aspect of the knee. The sartorial tendon is constantly affected. Such complications can easily be avoided by entering the safety zone via a small auxiliary incision. This study provides evidence that complications affecting the peripheral structures of the medial aspect of the knee may arise during inside-out suture of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus and proposes a simple method of averting them.

Biomedical devices in meniscal repair

Preservation of the menisci is increasingly emphasized in orthopedic care of the knee. Techniques are rapidly emerging that allow easier accomplishment of this goal. In particular, the development of all-inside arthroscopic meniscal repair devices has facilitated more ready repair. A number of laboratory and clinical studies have examined these devices and comparisons with more traditional techniques have been made. Numerous reports of potential complications from these new technologies have also been described in the literature. This review covers the current options for treatment of meniscal repair, laboratory and clinical data, and also potential complications.

Histoacryl glue in meniscal repairs (a biomechanical study)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical efficacy of Histoacryl (cyanoacrylate, N-asetil 2 butyl sistein) in meniscal tear repair. In our study, the primary stability of three different repair techniques in delaying the formation of a gap of 2 mm was investigated. A meniscal tear was repaired with two vertical sutures and Histoacryl in the first group; it was repaired only with Histoacryl in the second group, and with only two vertical sutures in the third group. Menisci were then placed in a tensile loading machine, and the primary stability of the repair zones was measured until a displacement of 2 mm occurred. Biomechanical force was significantly (P<0.05) high (112.0+/-17.20 N) in all groups when vertical suture and Histoacryl glue were used together during displacements of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm. We believe that Histoacryl is superior to vertical sutures regarding gap delaying. It potentiates the effect of vertical suture strength, permits early motion and thus merits an in vivo study.

Midterm results of meniscal repair using the BioStinger meniscal repair device

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm healing rate and any adverse events from meniscus repair using the BioStinger meniscus repair device (Linvatec, Largo, FL).

METHODS

A retrospective review of a consecutive series of meniscal repairs performed by a single surgeon using the BioStinger was conducted. The BioStinger is cannulated, made of molded poly L-lactic acid, and inserted over a needle into the meniscus tissue. Clinical results and adverse events were noted, and Lysholm, Tegner, Cincinnati, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) activity scores were obtained on all patients.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent 41 meniscal repairs with an average follow-up of 38.6 months (range, 24 to 69 months); 35 meniscus repairs were performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and 6 in stable knees. Tears repaired were peripheral, posterior horn tears with an average length of 2 cm. Clinical evidence of meniscal healing was observed in 95% at the time of last follow-up. Six second-look arthroscopies were performed and 2 failures were found. All other patients were symptom free. At follow-up, the mean Tegner score was 6.1 (2.8 preoperative), IKDC activity score was 3.3 (2.1 preoperative), Lysholm score was 90.6 (48.7 preoperative), and the mean Cincinnati score was 86.7 (41.3 preoperative). Four patients had peripheral migration of the device without skin tenting or perforation; 3 underwent removal of the BioStinger from the soft tissues and the other resolved after 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The midterm clinical success rate was 95% using the BioStinger device. Adverse events were observed in few cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, cases series.

Arthroscopic meniscal repair using the BioStinger

PURPOSE

Biodegradable devices are available for all-inside meniscal repairs. One device, the BioStinger (Linvatec, Largo, FL), is made of molded poly-L-lactic acid. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of and any adverse events associated with meniscus repair using this device.

TYPE OF STUDY

Nonrandomized prospective cohort study.

METHODS

A prospective, consecutive, 3-center meniscal repair series using BioStingers (group 1), vertical inside-out sutures (group 2), or hybrid repairs combining BioStingers and sutures (group 3) was studied. Lysholm, Tegner, Cincinnati, and IKDC activity scores were obtained and clinical outcomes and adverse events documented.

RESULTS

There were 85 patients who underwent 89 meniscus repairs with an average 26.5 months of follow-up. There were 47 BioStinger repairs (group 1), 29 suture repairs (group 2), and 13 hybrid repairs (group 3). The tear length was statistically greater for the hybrid repair group (P < .5). There were 73 repairs associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and 12 repeat arthroscopies were performed. Meniscal healing failed in 6 knees (4 in group 1, 0 in group 2, and 2 in group 3). The meniscal healing failed in 7% of those associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Mean Tegner scores improved from 2.8 to 6.3, the final IKDC activity score was 3.2 out of 4, the mean Lysholm score improved from 51 to 88, and the mean Cincinnati score improved from 44 to 84. Two BioStinger repair cases had joint-line tenderness from device migration confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. No tenting of the skin or articular cartilage scuffing was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The success rate for the 29 suture repairs was 100% and for the 47 BioStinger repairs was 91%. These preliminary results are consistent with other repair techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Therapeutic Prospective Cohort Study.