Anterior portal selection for shoulder arthroscopy

Risk of Cephalic Vein Injury During the Creation of an Anterior Portal in Shoulder Arthroscopy

Background

There is a risk of cephalic vein injury during shoulder arthroscopy. However, limited data regarding its anatomic course are available.

Purpose

To analyze the positional relationship and factors affecting the distance between the coracoid tip and cephalic veins.

Study design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 80 contrast-enhanced computed tomography images from 80 patients (mean age, 49.6 ± 20.3 years; 61 men) were retrospectively analyzed. The distance between the center of the coracoid tip and the vertical line through the cephalic vein was measured in the axial (D1) and sagittal (D2) planes. The distance between 1 cm lateral to the center of the coracoid tip and the vertical line through the cephalic vein was measured in the sagittal plane (D3). Each distance was compared according to patient sex and laterality. Associations between each distance and the patient's age, height, weight, and body mass index were investigated.

Results

The mean D1 was 18.4 ± 7.3 mm in 59 patients. The mean D2 was 23.4 ± 11.6 mm, and it was within 10 mm in 10 patients (12.5%). The mean D3 was 33.7 ± 12.2 mm. There was no significant difference in D1, D2, and D3 according to patient sex or laterality. A positive correlation was observed only between D3 and patient height (r = 0.320; P = .034).

Conclusion

The cephalic vein was found to travel a mean of 23.4 mm distal and 33.7 mm distal to 1 cm lateral to the coracoid tip. Therefore, Care should be taken to avoid cephalic vein injury when creating an anterior inferior portal or 5-o'clock portal around these areas.

Computed Tomography Scan Versus Saline Load Test for Detection of Traumatic Shoulder Arthrotomy: A Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVES

Traumatic shoulder arthrotomy (TSA) is a rare injury that is commonly detected through saline load test (SLT). There are no studies that have studied the ability of computed tomography (CT) scan to detect a TSA. The purpose of this study is to determine the ability of CT scan to detect a TSA and compare it with the SLT.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric shoulders were included in the study. Before intervention, a CT scan was conducted to determine presence of intra-articular air. After confirmation that no air was present, an arthrotomy was made at the anterior or posterior portal site. A CT was obtained postarthrotomy to evaluate for intra-articular air. Each shoulder then underwent an SLT to assess the sensitivity of SLT and the volume needed for extravasation.

RESULTS

Twelve shoulders were included after a pre-intervention CT scan. Six shoulders received an arthrotomy through the anterior portal and six shoulders received an arthrotomy through the posterior portal. After the arthrotomy, air was visualized on CT scan in 11 of the 12 shoulders (92%). All 12 shoulders demonstrated extravasation during SLT. The mean volume of saline needed for extravasation was 29 mL with an SD of 10 and range of 18-50 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

CT scan is a sensitive modality (sensitivity of 92%) for detection of TSA. In comparison, SLT is more sensitive (sensitivity of 100%) and outperforms CT scan for the diagnosis of TSA in a cadaveric model. Further research is needed to solidify the role that CT imaging has in the diagnosis of TSAs.

The Shoulder Trans-pectoralis Arthroscopic Portal Is a Safe Approach to the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: A Cadaveric Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the proximity of neurovascular structures in a layered approach during medial portal placement and determine standardized measurements for establishing a portal medial to the coracoid used in arthroscopic Latarjet-type procedures.

METHODS

Twelve shoulders (6 right and 6 left) in 6 fresh frozen cadaveric torsos were mounted in the modified beach-chair position. A standard posterior portal and 3 anterior portals-central, lateral, and medial-were used. A long spinal needle was placed along the path of the medial portal to the lateral tip of the coracoid, superficial to the conjoined tendon and pectoralis minor. A second long spinal needle was directed toward the medial base of the coracoid, penetrating the pectoralis minor. Superficial and deep plane dissections were performed, and distances to surrounding neurovascular structures were recorded.

RESULTS

In the superficial plane, the cephalic vein and lateral pectoral nerve were located a mean distance (± standard deviation) of 4.6 ± 1.9 mm and 9.4 ± 2.6 mm from the spinal needle, respectively. In the deep plane, the axillary nerve was 24.9 ± 7.4 mm from the needle; the lateral cord of the brachial plexus, 25.5 ± 8.1 mm; the axillary artery, 34.1 ± 6.0 mm; and the musculocutaneous nerve, 42.2 ± 9.2 mm. The portal was consistently established 45.0 to 50.0 mm distal and 30.0 to 35.0 mm medial to the coracoid, which was a minimum distance of 10 mm to the lateral pectoral nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cadaveric model, the creation of a medial trans-pectoralis major portal used in the arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure can avoid compromise of vital neurovascular structures, alleviating concerns of creating a portal medial to the coracoid. Portal placement 45.0 to 50.0 mm distal and 30.0 to 35.0 mm medial to the palpable tip of the coracoid process may be a safe approach to perform the arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Creation of a portal medial to the level of the coracoid may pose a risk to neurovascular structures. This cadaveric study establishes a working zone for medial trans-pectoralis portal placement, which avoids vital neurovascular structures, and provides standardized measurements for establishing this portal for use in the arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure.

Peripheral Nerve Injury Following Interscalene Blocks: A Systematic Review to Guide Orthopedic Surgeons

The purpose of this review was to determine the incidence and duration of peripheral neurologic symptoms following interscalene blocks for shoulder surgery. Three databases were reviewed for subjective and objective injuries by guidance modality and delivery method. The incidence of neurologic injuries following single site injection interscalene blocks, 3.16%, was significantly less than the 5.24% incidence for continuous catheter infusion interscalene blocks. Less than 0.51% of peripheral neurologic symptoms persisted beyond 1 year for both groups. There is a notable risk of injury following interscalene blocks by all modes of guidance and anesthetic technique, but only a small percentage of injuries persist. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e598-e606.].

Fixation methods and implants in shoulder stabilization: A historical perspective

BACKGROUND

Treatment for shoulder instability has changed significantly over the past decade from open procedures to arthroscopic procedures using a variety of different fixation methods and implants. The development of these implants has been highly influenced by the numerous complications that have arisen using early designs.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to describe the history of shoulder stabilization.

CONCLUSION

As biomedical technology improves, we should continue to see changes to implant design and manufacturing. Having an understanding of the history and evolution of these implants will provide us with context in which to guide future implant design and clinical use. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of early shoulder stabilization techniques and implants to the modern implants being used today.

Distal Mononeuropathy Before and After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Investigation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the occurrence of distal mononeuropathy (DMN) in patients before and after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) as well as resolution of the symptoms.

METHODS

One hundred one patients over the age of 18 undergoing arthroscopic RCR +/- concurrent procedures completed a questionnaire regarding the presence of a symptomatic DMN. Patients with history of diabetic neuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, or Spurling sign were excluded. All patients underwent physical examination to determine the characteristics and location of symptoms. Postoperatively, patients underwent repeat examination at 2, 6, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 19% (19/101) of RCR patients described DMN symptoms (9 median nerve symptoms, 5 ulnar nerve symptoms, 4 nonspecific symptoms, one with both ulnar and median nerve symptoms). Ninety percent (17/19) patients with preoperative DMN symptoms described resolution within the final 12 weeks of follow-up. A portion of previously asymptomatic RCR patients (12/82) developed new DMN symptoms (6 nonspecific symptoms, 3 ulnar nerve symptoms, 2 median nerve symptoms, one radial sensory nerve symptoms) postoperatively, with 92% (11/12) having resolution by the final 12-week follow-up. At the final 12 weeks, 3 RCR patients had DMN symptoms with 2 of those 3 patients having their symptoms existing preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the hypothesis that DMN can be a preexisting finding in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR. Similarly, it is common for patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR to develop new DMN symptoms following their procedure. Regardless, there is good evidence to show that a large majority of both groups of patients will go on to have resolution of their symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prospective case series.

Orthopedic resident's learning curve for arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic subscapularis (SSC) repair is a technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve. As effective completion of resident's practical experience remains controversial, a prospective clinical study was performed to assess the functional and anatomical outcomes of subscapularis (SSC) arthroscopic repair by orthopedic residents. The pathological anatomy of the tears, the surgical approach and the difficulties encountered at the beginning of the learning curve were reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2009 and June 2010, 30 patients with rotator cuff tear were preoperatively evaluated with clinical exam, Constant and UCLA scores. Surgery was performed under arthroscopy by a team of three orthopedic surgeons in training. A SSC tear, if present, was recorded and treated. The same clinical exam and functional scores were repeated at minimum 6 months of follow-up. Subscapularis strength recovery and tendon healing were investigated with arthromagnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

A SSC tear was observed in 11 cases out of 30 and treated arthroscopically. The clinical scores improved in all patients: the average Constant score increased from 34 ± 14 to 77 ± 11 and the UCLA score from 11 ± 5 to 29 ± 3. The SSC tests were negative in all patients with the exception of one. Tendon healing was observed in 10 out of 11 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic SSC repair performed by educated residents is possible and leads to good clinical and anatomical results. Surgery duration progressively improved as the learning curve advanced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Single Working Portal Technique for Knotless Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Arthroscopic Bankart repair is widely accepted as the method of choice in restoring the labrum to the glenoid rim. It has been shown to have comparable outcomes with open stabilization. This usually involves the use of 2 portals anteriorly: one anterosuperior accessory portal and another anteroinferior working portal. The aim of this Technical Note is to present a simple and reproducible technique for Bankart repair using a single working portal anteriorly without an accessory portal.

Postoperative evaluation of drill holes for arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors by the use of computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Here we investigated the angle and placement of bone holes for suture anchors using postoperative computed-tomography scapula scans.

METHODS

The study group comprised 20 shoulders from 20 consecutive patients (13 males and seven females; mean age 23.4 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. All anchors were inserted through the anterior portal after establishing a bone hole at the edge of the glenoid articular surface using a drill. Computed tomography images of the scapula were taken 1 month postoperatively and used to create three-dimensional scapula models with Mimics and Magics software. Bone holes in the anterior-inferior (3:00-6:00) position were assigned either to the non-perforated group if they were positioned entirely inside the glenoid bone or to the perforated group if the far cortex of the glenoid was penetrated by the drill. The angle between the glenoid articular surface and the bone hole was measured in the oblique coronal and transverse plane views. The length of the bone hole was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 85 bone holes investigated, 42 were in the 3:00-6:00 position. Perforation was detected in 16 of these 42 holes (38.2%). The angle in the oblique coronal plane view and the length of the bone hole were significantly larger in the non-perforated group than in the perforated group; however, the angle in the transverse plane view did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Before inserting an implant in the anterior-inferior area, the angle between the drill guide and the glenoid surface in the oblique coronal plane view should be carefully checked to ensure that the length of the hole inside the glenoid bone is adequate.

A bizarre complication of shoulder arthroscopy

A case is presented of an unusual complication of shoulder arthroscopy, which was caused by incorrect location of the posterior portal, inducing neurapraxia of both the axillary and radial nerves, with significant clinical and functional sequelae. A subsequent open surgical neurolysis was required to restore normal nerve function. This type of lesion has not been reported previously. Level of evidence V.

Multidirectional instability of the shoulder: biomechanics, clinical presentation, and treatment strategies

Multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder is a condition where the dislocation occurs in more than one direction with minimal or no causative trauma. Its pathoanatomy is complex and characterized by a redundant capsule, resulting in increased glenohumeral joint volume. The fact that several further factors may contribute to symptom onset complicates the diagnosis and hampers the identification of a therapeutic approach suitable for all cases. There is general agreement that the initial treatment should be conservative and that surgery should be reserved for patients who have not responded to an ad hoc rehabilitation program. We review the biomechanics, clinical presentation, and treatment strategies of shoulder MDI.

Outcomes of arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage and anterior Bankart repair: a retrospective controlled study including ultrasound evaluation of posterior capsulotenodesis and infraspinatus strength assessment

BACKGROUND

Hill-Sachs lesions are compression fractures that result from shoulder dislocation. They involve "engaging" the humeral head on the anterior glenoid rim when the arm is abducted and externally rotated. The defect grows as the number of dislocations increases.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic remplissage and anterior Bankart repair do not significantly affect infraspinatus strength while ensuring healing of the capsulotenodesis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability treated by arthroscopic Bankart repair and Hill-Sachs remplissage at least 24 months previously were compared with a control group of 40 healthy participants. Preoperative imaging included magnetic resonance imaging for Bankart lesion identification and computed tomography to quantify the humeral head defect. Active range of motion and clinical scores (Walch-Duplay, Constant-Murley, and Rowe) were assessed. External rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) were measured with arm at the side (ER1 and IR1) and abducted at 90° (ER2 and IR2). Infraspinatus strength was assessed with the scapula free (infraspinatus strength test [IST]) and retracted (infraspinatus scapula retraction test [ISRT]). Infraspinatus tenodesis and posterior capsulodesis healing were evaluated by ultrasound (US).

RESULTS

The follow-up median was 39.5 months (range, 24-56 months). One patient experienced a recurrence of instability at 34 months. In the remplissage patients, ER1 was significantly lower in the affected compared with the unaffected shoulder (P < .001). Mean IST and ISRT strength values did not show differences between sides. The mean Constant-Murley score rose from 62.9 ± 7.1 to 90 ± 5.2 (P < .0001). The Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores were excellent in 23 (78.6%), good in 6 (17.8%), and poor in 1 patient (both scores). The remplissage group had significantly lower ER1 (P < .001), ER2 (P < .001), and IR2 (P < .01) values compared with the control group. Differences in IST and ISRT between the groups were not significant. Capsulotenodesis healing and filling of the Hill-Sachs defect were confirmed by dynamic US in all subjects.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic remplissage is a reliable approach to Hill-Sachs lesions. The ER and IR restriction does not significantly affect quality of life. Infraspinatus strength recovery is satisfactory even compared with healthy subjects. Ultrasound examination allows accurate evaluation of capsulotenodesis healing.

Circumferential rotator cuff repair with the n+4 portal, subclavian portal, and high posteromedial portal

Passing suture during a rotator cuff repair requires proper orientation and purchase of the rotator cuff tendon. Our technique uses a new portal to improve access to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus and uses additional portals for a circumferential repair of the tear, thereby restoring the footprint. Using a penetrating suture passer through the anterior, posterior, and superomedial portals allows 270° of coverage. The lateral anchors complete the circumferential repair. Sutures from the medial anchors are passed in a retrograde fashion using 3 small incisions with no cannula. A spinal needle is used to localize the orientation of each portal. The N+4 portal is the workhorse portal, allowing access to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. The suture retriever enters the trapezius 5 cm from the medial border of the acromion and 1 cm anterior to the spine of the scapula. It enters the subacromial space on top of the supraspinatus. This provides protection to the suprascapular nerve in the supraspinatus fossa. The cuff is lifted with a grasper to allow perpendicular passage of suture. The suture is retrieved for tying. The tissue purchase and location of suture placement help restore the footprint of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Additional sutures are passed anteriorly through the subclavian portal and posteriorly through the high posteromedial portal. The repair is completed with lateral-row anchors as needed.

Distal peripheral neuropathy after open and arthroscopic shoulder surgery: an under-recognized complication

HYPOTHESIS

Distal peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is an under-reported complication after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty or arthroscopic RCR by 4 shoulder surgeons during a 2-year period. The primary outcome measure was the diagnosis of DPN, defined as carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, ulnar tunnel syndrome, and distal radial sensory neuropathy. Patient demographics and clinical course of DPN were recorded. Mean follow-up was 21, 15, and 12 months for TSA, RSA, and RCR, respectively.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 6 of 85 TSA (7.1%), 7 of 57 RSA (12.3%), and 21 of 753 RCR (2.79%) patients were diagnosed with DPN. The most common neuropathy was cubital tunnel syndrome for TSA and RSA and carpal tunnel syndrome for RCR. The risk of DPN was higher for shoulder arthroplasty (TSA and RSA) compared with the RCR group. After nonsurgical treatment of DPN, complete resolution of symptoms occurred in 33.3% of TSA, 42.86% of RSA, and 71.43% of RCR patients. However, 16.7% of TSA, 14.3% of RSA, and 4.76% of RCR patients with DPN required surgical decompression; 100% of the patients undergoing surgical decompression had complete resolution of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

DPN is a relatively common complication after shoulder surgery. When it occurs, DPN will often resolve with nonoperative management. Surgical decompression is an effective treatment option in refractory cases.

Complications of shoulder arthroscopy

Over the past 20 to 30 years, arthroscopic shoulder techniques have become increasingly popular. Although these techniques have several advantages over open surgery, surgical complications are no less prevalent or devastating than those associated with open techniques. Some of the complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery include recurrent instability, soft-tissue injury, and neurapraxia. These complications can be minimized with thoughtful consideration of the surgical indications, careful patient selection and positioning, and a thorough knowledge of the shoulder anatomy. Deep infection following arthroscopic shoulder surgery is rare; however, the shoulder is particularly susceptible to Propionibacterium acnes infection, which is mildly virulent and has a benign presentation. The surgeon must maintain a high index of suspicion for this infection. Thromboemoblic complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder techniques are also rare, and studies have shown that pharmacologic prophylaxis has minimal efficacy in preventing these complications. Because high-quality studies on the subject are lacking, minimal evidence is available to suggest strategies for prevention.

Pseudoaneurysm after arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is considered a safe and effective method of treating a variety of shoulder pathologies and is associated with a low complication rate. The type and rate of complications can vary, depending on the procedure, positioning, surgical time, and anesthesia. Fortunately, neurovascular injuries occur infrequently. Numerous studies have described the proximity of neurovascular structures to portals placed in shoulder arthroscopy, in both the beach chair and the lateral decubitus positions. Accurate portal placement is important to avoid damage to adjacent neurovascular structures. Inaccurate placement of portals can lead to inadvertent damage to these structures and create more difficulty with visualization and angle of instrumentation, possibly compromising the success of the procedure. This article describes a 50-year-old man who underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision for persistent subacromial impingement and acromioclavicular arthritis. During postoperative follow-up, the patient had a small, bulging area located near the anterior portal site. Examination showed a well-healed anterior portal site with a small (approximately 2×2 cm), nontender, immobile mass located within the deep soft tissues just below the anterior portal incision. Ultrasound evaluation showed a pseudoaneurysm of a branch off the axillary artery. The patient underwent successful embolization of the pseudoaneurysm, with complete resolution of symptoms.

The low-anterolateral portal for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: description of technique and cadaveric study

PURPOSE

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis surgery is an important procedure for the correction of biceps tendonitis or in conjunction with rotator cuff repair with biceps symptoms. Recent trends have developed in placing the biceps tendon lower in the bicipital groove for a tenodesis. However, a more distal biceps tenodesis location is technically challenging when carried out arthroscopically with standard posterior and lateral portals. We aimed to establish the safety of a low-anterolateral portal location for direct access to the lowest aspect of the bicipital groove.

METHODS

An anatomical study design was used to examine portal to neurovascular structural measurements in 23 cadaveric shoulders. These shoulders had undergone low-anterolateral portal placement over the inferior most aspect of the bicipital groove as determined by palpation and direct arthroscopic visualization. No arthroscopic irrigation was performed. Following this, the shoulders underwent open dissection with the cannula in place to evaluate for any potential damage to any portion of the axillary nerve.

RESULTS

All of the resultant portals in this study provided direct access to the inferior most aspect of the bicipital groove, and the dissection revealed that the portal was touching a small distal axillary nerve branch on the undersurface of the anterior deltoid in nearly half of the shoulders.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of a low-anterolateral portal for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis at the distal bicipital groove does not produce significant neurovascular damage; the portal trajectory comes close to distal anterior branches of the axillary nerve. Given these findings, this portal should be placed bluntly to best protect these underlying neurovascular structures.

Peripheral nerve injuries in sports-related surgery: presentation, evaluation, and management: AAOS exhibit selection

Peripheral nerve injuries during sports-related operative interventions are rare complications, but the associated morbidity can be substantial. Early diagnosis, efficient and effective evaluation, and appropriate management are crucial to maximizing the prognosis, and a clear and structured algorithm is therefore required. We describe the surgical conditions and interventions that are commonly associated with intraoperative peripheral nerve injuries. In addition, we review the common postoperative presentations of patients with these injuries as well as the anatomic structures that are directly injured or associated with these injuries during the operation. Some examples of peripheral nerve injuries incurred during sports-related surgery include ulnar nerve injury during ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow and elbow arthroscopy, median nerve injury during ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow, axillary nerve injury during Bankart repair and the Bristow transfer, and peroneal nerve injury during posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee and arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. We also detail the clinical and radiographic evaluation of these patients, including the utility and timing of radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, electromyography (EMG), and nonoperative or operative management. The diagnosis, evaluation, and management of peripheral nerve injuries incurred during sports-related surgical interventions are critical to minimizing patient morbidity and maximizing postoperative function. Although these injuries occur during a variety of procedures, common themes exist regarding evaluation techniques and treatment algorithms. Nonoperative treatment includes physical therapy and medical management. Operative treatments include neurolysis, transposition, neurorrhaphy, nerve transfer, and tendon transfer. This article provides orthopaedic surgeons with a simplified, literature-based algorithm for evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injuries associated with sports-related operative procedures.

Complications in shoulder arthroscopy

Shoulder arthroscopy is generally a safe and effective method for treating a wide variety of shoulder pathology. Fortunately, complications following shoulder arthroscopy are rare, with reported rates between 4.6% and 10.6%.¹⁻⁷ These rates may be underestimated, as underreporting of complications and varying definitions of the term complication are likely. During shoulder arthroscopy, complications may occur at numerous points. The surgeon must be aware of potential problems and take necessary measures to prevent them. This article describes common complications after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Although failure of treatment and postoperative stiffness are undesirable outcomes, they are not described.

ANATOMICAL RELATIONSHIP OF THE SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE TO THE CORACOID PROCESS, ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT AND ACROMION

OBJECTIVE

To establish the anatomical relationship of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) located in the suprascapular notch, to the medial border of the base of the coracoid process, the acromial joint surface of the acromioclavicular joint and the anterolateral border of the acromion.

METHODS

We dissected 16 shoulders of 16 cadavers (9 males and 7 females). The distances from the suprascapular nerve (at its passage beneath the transverse ligament) to certain fixed points on the medial border of the base of the coracoid process, the acromial joint surface of the acromioclavicular joint, and the anterolateral border of the acromion were measured with the aid of calipers and correlated with age and sex. Cadavers with previous surgical interventions were excluded.

RESULTS

The mean measurements from the notch of the suprascapular nerve were: 3.9 cm to the medial border of the base of the coracoid process (ranging from 3.1 cm to 5.2 cm); 4.7 cm to the acromioclavicular joint (ranging from 3.9 cm to 5.2 cm); and 6.1 cm to the anterolateral border of the acromion (ranging from 5.7 cm to 6.8 cm).

CONCLUSION

Accurate anatomical knowledge of the nerves of the anterior region of the shoulder is essential in order to avoid iatrogenic injuries and to achieve satisfactory results in surgical treatment for shoulder diseases, whether performed as open or arthroscopic procedures.

Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid

Advancing technology, improved instrumentation, and a desire to address intra-articular pathology with a minimally invasive approach have driven the expansion of arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the past 2 decades. Proponents cite greatly improved visualization, lack of the need to perform a capsulotomy, fewer subscapularis issues postoperatively, and improved access to the entire glenohumeral joint. Our understanding and recognition of glenohumeral joint pathology have improved, and our ability to appropriately treat it has also improved. Aside from the anteroinferior and superior capsulolabral injury, orthopaedic surgeons have encountered and are able to address combined lesions, posterior labral tears, 270 degrees to 360 degrees labral tears, capsular laxity, humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments, associated glenoid or humeral bone loss, and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. To adequately address the extent of pathology encountered in a shoulder instability case, access to the inferior, posteroinferior, and posterior aspects is necessary. In this technical article we present a simplified approach using safe access points by dividing the glenohumeral joint into 4 quadrants that allows for ease of instrumentation and implant placement. This will provide a blueprint for the treatment of capsulolabral injuries. In addition to portal selection and location, we will discuss several instruments we believe are advantageous in tissue manipulation and suture management.

The anatomy and function of the low posterolateral portal in addressing posterior labral pathology

PURPOSE

A standard posterior portal allows excellent visualization of the glenohumeral joint but is inadequate for anchor placement because of its parallelism to the glenoid surface. The purpose of this study was to describe the low posterolateral portal for glenohumeral arthroscopy, describe the anatomy of the portal and surrounding structures, and discuss the portal's usefulness in addressing posterior and inferior shoulder pathology.

METHODS

Five cadaveric shoulders were dissected after placement of a spear through the low posterolateral portal. The location was identified via a spinal needle, 2 to 4 cm lateral and 4 to 5 cm inferior to the posterolateral corner of the acromion. Measurements from the spear to the anatomic structures were recorded with a caliper. Seventeen patients with posterior labral pathology were included in this study. The low posterolateral portal was established while visualizing through the anterosuperolateral or posterior portal. The spear and anchor were inserted through the low posterolateral portal.

RESULTS

Five shoulders were dissected, and the neurovascular structures relative to the low posterolateral portal were identified. The portal was 13.8 +/- 1.6 mm from the axillary nerve and 13.4 +/- 1.2 mm from the posterior humeral circumflex artery. In the retrospective review the low posterolateral portal was created without difficulty or complication in all 17 patients. The portal was extremely helpful for anchor insertion in the posteroinferior glenoid. It was useful in suture passage through the posterior and inferior labrum and in suture management.

CONCLUSIONS

The low posterolateral portal provides the optimal angle for insertion of instruments and anchors, resulting in a more anatomic repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The standard 3 portals are not optimal for approaching posterior and inferior labral tears, and use of the low posterolateral portal improves access and treatment.

Anatomic risks of shoulder arthroscopy portals: anatomic cadaveric study of 12 portals

PURPOSE

The purpose of this anatomic cadaveric study was to determine with trocars in situ the relationships of 12 shoulder arthroscopic portals frequently used with the adjacent musculotendinous and neurovascular structures.

METHODS

Twelve shoulders of embalmed cadavers installed in a beach-chair position were dissected. Twelve different portals were established by using their authors' description: posterior "soft point," central posterior, anterior central, anterior inferior, anterior superior, 5 o'clock portal, Neviaser, superolateral, transrotator cuff approach, Port of Wilmington, anterolateral, and posterolateral. Six of these portals were placed on each shoulder so that each portal was studied 6 times. Dissections were conduced with trocars in situ to take into account their volume. The distance to the adjacent relevant neurovascular structures at risk (axillar and suprascapular nerves, axillar and suprascapular arteries, and cephalic vein) were measured, arm at side, by using a calliper. Musculotendinous structures crossed by portals were noticed.

RESULTS

The cephalic vein was injured twice by anterior portals. The 5 o'clock portal is at most risk of neurovascular injury. It is located at mean distances to the axillar artery and nerve of 13 and 15 mm, respectively. Other anterior, posterior, superior, and lateral portals are safe with mean distances higher than 20 mm. No musculotendinous rupture nor large injury occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the trocars placement of the studied portals did not create, except for the cephalic vein, any lesion of the neurovascular adjacent structures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests, except for the 5 o'clock portal, the safety of the shoulder arthroscopic portals tested regarding to the neurovascular adjacent structures.

Complication et prévention de l'arthroscopie du membre supérieur

Arthroscopy for upper limb joints disorders has been used increasingly over the past two decades, and is often considered by population as minor surgery. It would be a mistake to mask potential complications, even if they are less important than equivalent conventional technique. Complications depend on the joint, and despite the relative lack of experience for wrist and small joints, elbow arthroscopy seems to be the arthroscopic technique with most important complication rate. However, most of these complications remain minor and curable. Teaching of anatomy and arthroscopic techniques, respect of elementary prudence rules, should allow to control the risk and the learnig curve. Clear and honest information about potential complications provided to patient is certainly the best way to reduce consequences of these complications.

Ankle anatomy for the arthroscopist. Part I: The portals

Proper portal placement is critical to performing good diagnostic and therapeutic arthroscopy. When the portals are positioned improperly, visualization can be impaired, making diagnosis and treatment more difficult. Three main anterior portals are available in arthroscopy of the ankle: anteromedial, anterolateral, and anterocentral. Posterior portals are also routinely used in ankle arthroscopy and can be established at a posterolateral or posteromedial position or directly through the Achilles tendon. Because of the potential for serious complications, the anterocentral and transAchilles portals are no longer used. Other portals have been described to obtain more complete access, particularly to the posterior compartment of the ankle joint. This work reviews the relationships that exist between the most important anatomic structures and arthroscopic portals of the ankle.

Glenohumeral arthroscopy portals established using an outside-in technique: neurovascular anatomy at risk

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the neurovascular structures at risk during placement of glenohumeral arthroscopy portals using an outside-in technique.

TYPE OF STUDY

Anatomic cadaveric study.

METHODS

Five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Each shoulder was mounted on a custom-designed apparatus allowing shoulder arthroscopy in a lateral decubitus position. The following portals were established using an outside-in technique and marked using an 18-gauge spinal needle: posterior, posterolateral, anterior, 5-o'clock, anterosuperolateral, and Port of Wilmington. Each specimen was carefully dissected after the procedure, and the distance from each portal site to the adjacent relevant neurovascular structures (axillary nerve, musculocutaneous nerve, lateral cord of the brachial plexus, cephalic vein, and axillary artery) was measured using a precision caliper.

RESULTS

Except for the cephalic vein, all of the neurovascular structures were more than 20 mm away from all the portals evaluated. When creating either an anterior portal or a 5-o'clock position portal, the mean distance from the portal to the cephalic vein was 18.8 mm and 9.8 mm, respectively. In one anterior portal, a direct injury to the cephalic vein occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that shoulder arthroscopy portals placed in an outside-in fashion are unlikely to produce neurologic injury. However, the cephalic vein is at risk during placement of an anterior or 5-o'clock position portal, although probably with minimal subsequent patient morbidity. Placing portals in an outside-in fashion guarantees the correct angle of approach, with minimal risk to adjacent neurologic structures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows the safety of standard and accessory glenohumeral arthroscopy portals.

The new subclavian portal and modified Neviaser portal for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Shoulder arthroscopy and the introduction of suture anchors has provided the surgeon with the ability to repair rotator cuff tears through minimal incisions. Rotator cuff repair involves the use of several portals, such as the posterior portal, the anterior portal, the anterior superior portal, the anterior inferior portal, and the Neviaser portal. The authors have developed 2 additional portals, the new Subclavian portal and the modified Neviaser portal, to improve the safety and efficacy of rotator cuff repair and solve a number of problems associated with traditional repair techniques. The subclavian portal is located directly below the clavicle, 1 to 2 cm from the acromioclavicular joint, and instruments are aimed medial to lateral. The modified Neviaser portal changes the angle of insertion of the Neviaser portal. Instruments are aimed 20 degrees from the horizontal plane and 45 degrees anterior, directly at the suture anchor. Repair techniques using each portal were reviewed. Twenty cadaveric shoulders were dissected for each portal and the anatomy from each portal was documented. The cadaveric dissections showed that this portal passes greater than 6 cm from the brachial plexus, musculocutaneous nerve, and subclavian artery and vein, and 4.7 cm from the cephalic vein. The modified Neviaser portal was shown to be safer than the Neviaser portal because it passes on top of the supraspinatous muscle, thereby protecting the suprascapular nerve. These portals provide an optimal angle of approach to the rotator cuff tendon and suture anchor as well as improved safety and efficacy in the repair of rotator cuff tears.

The mini vent technique: a simple method to facilitate accurate secondary portal placement in shoulder arthroscopy

Accurate portal placement is crucial in diagnostic and therapeutic shoulder arthroscopy. However, knowledge of anatomy and surgical principles may not be enough. Placement of a second portal is often hindered by a small amount of bleeding. Our technique easily rectifies this frequent problem by using a simple mini-vent.

An arthroscopic technique for confirming intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon: the ramp test

The purpose of this technical note is to introduce the ramp test and explain this arthroscopic technique. The ramp test is used to test the integrity of the soft tissue restraint to intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon. Injury to the soft tissue restraint, the hidden lesion, has been proposed as occurring in conjunction with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Both cadaveric dissections and arthroscopic patient assessments were conducted to develop the ramp test. In this study, 17 patients also presented with refractory anterior shoulder pain and underwent arthroscopy to further characterize the ramp test. An abnormal examination result showed that the long head of the biceps tendon translated medially and inferiorly across the humeral head. In addition, this subgroup of 17 patients all had an abnormal ramp test but did not have a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. The ramp test is now applied to all arthroscopic procedures by the senior author, and we recommend its use for arthroscopic confirmation of intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon. Thus, we advocate that an abnormal ramp test result indicates pathology and warrants the surgical removal of the long head of the biceps tendon from the glenohumeral joint.

Differential arthroscopic portal placement for rotator cuff repair

We report an effective technique of arthroscopic portal placement for rotator cuff repair of the shoulder. The differential portals are placed depending on the location of the tear. After the glenohumeral arthroscopic examination, the subacromial bursoscopy is performed through the same posterior skin portal. With the rotator cuff tear in view, a spinal needle is inserted to the center of the tear, 3 cm from the lateral margin of the acromion (middle working portal). Another spinal needle is then inserted into the posterior lip of the tear, 1 cm from the lateral margin of the acromion (rear viewing portal). The rear viewing portal provides a good downward en-face view of the tear, and the middle working portal allows better access to the anterior and posterior margins of the cuff tear than the usual posterior and lateral portals do. This differential portal placement with respect to the location of the rotator cuff tear ensures superior access for arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears.

A comparison of clinical estimation, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy in determining the size of rotator cuff tears

This prospective study was undertaken to compare the ability of clinical estimation, diagnostic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy to estimate the size of rotator cuff tears. Estimates of rotator cuff tear size were compared with the findings at open operation in 33 consecutive patients with a presumptive diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy estimates of rotator cuff tear size correlated best with actual tear size (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.92; P <.001). Magnetic resonance imaging (r = 0.74; P <.001) was similar to ultrasonography (r = 0.73; P <.001). Estimates of rotator cuff tear size after clinical assessment alone had weaker correlation coefficients (r = 0.41; P =.02) than the other methods. Each method underestimated rotator cuff tear size by 12%, 30%, 33%, and 38%, respectively. No method was able to determine the size of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (r < 0.02).

Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder surgery

We review the literature on complication of arthroscopic shoulder surgery and their management. Computer data based searches were used to identify articles regarding complications of shoulder arthroscopy, as well as hand searches of Arthroscopy and Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery over the last decade. Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has become a popular therapeutic and diagnostic procedure during the past two decades. As with all interventions complications can occur which require recognition and management by the orthopedic surgeon. While the literature is helpful with identifying types of complications, establishing the rate of these complications remains elusive. These complications can be divided into general complications, complications generic to all shoulder procedures, and complications specific to the type of procedure performed. General complications such as infection and anesthesia problems continue to show low incidences. Shoulder arthroscopy presents increased risk of complications over knee arthroscopy in regard to vascular and neurologic injury, fluid extravasation, stiffness, iatrogenic tendon injury, and equipment failure. New techniques of increased complexity for subacromial surgery, rotator cuff repair, and arthroscopic instability present new problems related to implant failure, nerve injury, iatrogenic fracture, and capsular necrosis. While the rate of complications especially with newer procedures remain elusive, most studies suggest that the rate is low, 5.8-9.5% in all recent review studies published. Underreporting complications makes assessment of incidence rates of complication difficult. Proper patient selection, attention to operative detail, and careful post-operative monitoring can minimize the morbidity associated with these complications.

The posterolateral portal: A new approach for shoulder arthroscopy

Since the beginning of shoulder arthroscopy, many different approaches were described for Bankart repair to allow visualization and treatment. The anterior portals do not allow access to the posterior and inferior part of the glenoid. We present a new instrumental portal for shoulder arthroscopy. This approach is perfectly safe, without any anatomic risk. It is particularly helpful in the correct treatment of an anterior Bankart lesion, in repairing posterior and inferior extensions of a Bankart lesion, and in performing a plication in multidirectional hyperlaxity.

Arthroscopic shoulder instability surgery. Complications

Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder stabilization are relatively common. Excluding recurrence, complications are rarely disabling. Current statistics undoubtedly underestimate the true incidence of complications. Many complications, including neurovascular injuries and articular damage, are preventable and can be minimized through familiarity with anatomy, proper surgical technique and instrumentation, and clinical experience. Nevertheless, despite these efforts, a few complications, including recurrent instability, persist. Despite careful patient selection and attention to labral pathology and capsular laxity, arthroscopic repairs continue to have success rates lower than those achieved through open means. While cautiously proceeding toward a more complete understanding of the instability continuum, surgeons must maintain a high index of suspicion for new techniques that purport to "solve" the problem of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization, lest the history of enthusiastic but ultimately unsubstantiated claims is repeated. Outcomes must withstand the rigors of scientific scrutiny and the test of time. Without this cautious vigilance, the appeal of today's solutions becomes the fodder of tomorrow's articles about the complications of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.

The low anterior five-o'clock portal during arthroscopic shoulder surgery performed in the beach-chair position

We evaluated the difficulty, accuracy, and safety of establishing a low anterior 5-o'clock portal for anterior capsulolabral repair in patients positioned in the beach-chair position during shoulder arthroscopy. An initial 5-o'clock portal was created using an inside-out technique as described by Davidson and Tibone. During establishment of the portal, significant force was required to lever the humeral head laterally, and chondral indentations were noted in several specimens. Because of the difficulty noted establishing the 5-o'clock portal using an inside-out technique, we attempted to establish a 5-o'clock anterior portal using an outside-in technique. Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach-chair position. After the establishment of a 3-o'clock portal, a specially constructed guide was used to place a pin at the 5-o'clock position. The distances of the pins from the cephalic vein and the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves were recorded. The bottom (5-o'clock position) and top (3-o'clock position) pins varied from 12 to 20 mm from the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves. The bottom pin was located within 2 mm of the cephalic vein and varied from medial to lateral in different specimens. We do not recommend the use of a 5-o'clock portal using an inside-out or outside-in technique for patients positioned in the beach-chair position during shoulder arthroscopy because of the potential for cephalic vein or articular cartilage injury.

The adduction distraction maneuver

The adduction distraction maneuver is presented as an adjunct to the surgeon's technical skills to assist with the initial introduction of the shoulder arthroscope. Both novice and experienced arthroscopists can experience difficulty establishing access to the glenohumeral joint. Often this results in articular cartilage or soft tissue damage. The adduction distraction maneuver when used in the "beach chair" seated position for shoulder arthroscopy can facilitate posterior portal placement and minimize iatrogenic trauma.

The antero-inferior (transmuscular) approach for arthroscopic repair of the Bankart lesion: an anatomic and clinical study

In order to find a direct approach to the antero-inferior third of the glenoid rim, an anatomic study was performed on a total of 89 shoulders (48 cadavers). To obtain defined reference points for the anterior inferior third of the glenoid cavity, it was compared with the hour markings on a clock face. The 4:30 position on the right shoulder and the 7:30 position on the left shoulder were defined as the relevant reference points. The average distance between the palpable end of the coracoid process and the 4:30 and 7:30 positions was 19 mm. The average distance to the point of intersection of the musculocutaneous nerve with the medial margin of the conjoined tendon was more than 5 cm, and was never less than 2 cm. The average distance of the axillary nerve from the 4:30 position was 2.5 cm in the horizontal plane, with a minimum of 1.5 cm. Radially, the average distance of the axillary nerve was 1.7 cm, with a minimum of 1.3 cm. The anatomic study was followed by a clinical study of 264 patients. An antero-inferior portal located maximum 2 cm distal from the palpable coracoid tip was selected for the introduction of a trocar sheath and blunt trocar, passing through the subscapularis muscle to access the antero-inferior area of the glenoid rim. As additional protection for the musculocutaneous nerve, the direction of the trocar was adjusted during introduction. Reattachment of the labrum-capsule complex was performed extra-articularly. In all cases, at least one implant was located inferior to the 4:30 or 7:30 position. No neurovascular complications arose out of the choice of portal. Out of the 264 patients, the first 100 shoulders (98 patients) were followed-up after an average time of 35 months (18 to 62 months). The recurrence rate was 9%. Excluding the first 30 shoulders (30 patients) from the development phase of the technique, the recurrence rate is only 5.7%. The rate of return to overhead sports activities was 62% and to collision sports activities 70%.

Anterior-inferior (5 o'clock) portal for shoulder arthroscopy

The present study describes an anterior-inferior portal for arthroscopic shoulder instrumentation at the 5 o'clock position along the glenoid rim. An anterior-inferior portal was established in 14 cadaver shoulders. The portal was created in an inside-to-outside fashion, with the humerus maximally adducted, directing the guide rod as far lateral as possible. Using the described technique, a 5 o'clock portal travels through the subscapularis and lateral to the conjoined tendon. Distance between the portal and the musculocutaneous nerve was 22.9 +/- 4.9 mm (mean +/- SD), and 24.4 +/- 5.7 mm between the portal and the axillary nerve. Previously described portals were either at, or above the 3 o'clock position, resulting in an acute, difficult angle of approach to the glenoid neck. Through a combination of proper arm positioning and rod insertion technique, the 5 o'clock portal can be created safely and is of great potential utility for arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures.

Shoulder arthroscopy and nerve injury: pitfalls and prevention

Shoulder arthroscopy has become a very useful diagnostic and therapeutic modality. Unfortunately, like many other invasive procedures it can have complications. One of the most worrisome complications, for both the patient and surgeon, is that of nerve injury. Nerve injury during shoulder arthroscopy is often a transient phenomenon although a more severe injury has been documented. We review much of the literature on this subject and discuss some of the many pitfalls and preventative strategies that have been reported.

The superolateral portal for arthroscopy of the shoulder

With the advent of arthroscopic procedures for the treatment of a variety of clinical conditions affecting the shoulder has come the need for better techniques for visualization of structural pathology, and better techniques for visualization of intracapsular structures during operative procedures. We present a new portal for shoulder arthroscopy that is safe to insert, providing a panoramic view of the glenohumeral joint (especially anteriorly), and allowing unobstructed observation of large instruments passed through more traditional anterior portals nearby. The superolateral portal is particularly suited for use in anterior stabilization procedures of the shoulder, where it can be used for direct visualization of the anterior glenoid neck, thus permitting the surgeon to perform such tasks as debridement or mobilization of tissues, and placement of tacks or sutures.

Arthroscopic staple capsulorrhaphy for anterior shoulder instability

We reviewed the results of the arthroscopic staple capsulorrhaphy on 47 patients with a followup of 4 years. Thirty-four of the 47 shoulders had a history of traumatic dislocation, while the remaining 13 had a history of subluxation. The recurrence rate was 25%, with 8 shoulders developing recurrent frank dislocation and 4 developing subluxation. Only 21 of the 47 patients were able to resume normal sporting activities after surgical repair. We had no cases of staple loosening within the joint, but we did have 3 patients whose staples were removed because of persistent pain in the shoulder.

Anterior portals in shoulder arthroscopy

The anterior portal has been the major operative portal through which hand and motorized instrumentation have been introduced into the glenohumeral joint. This portal has been limited with respect to its access to structures in the anteroinferior aspect of the joint. Anatomical and clinical studies were undertaken to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of an anterior inferior, as well as an anterior superior portal. Seventy-eight unembalmed cadaver specimens and 34 operative cases were used in the studies. Only an "inside out" technique using blunt instrumentation is recommended in creating the anterior inferior portal. The margin of safety with respect to the musculocutaneous nerve is increased with adduction. The use of these two anterior portals greatly enhanced our ability to visualize and work directly on lesions of the glenohumeral ligament labral complex. These anterior portals can be safely created if guidelines are carefully followed by surgeons with considerable experience in shoulder arthroscopy.