[Subarachnoid anesthesia with pethidine]

The Effectiveness of Caudal Block with Low Doses of Dexmedetomidine and Pethidine in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: Preliminary Results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of caudal block (CB) using dexmedetomidine and pethidine instead of local anesthesia (LA) for prostate needle biopsy and the effect of CB on urinary retention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy (TRUS-Bx) was performed on 68 patients with a mean age of 65 ± 2.18 years. CB with a combination of dexmedetomidine and pethidine without LA was administered to the patients. The pain levels of the patients were determined using numeric rating scale (NRS) scores to evaluate the effectiveness of CB. Preoperative and postoperative postvoid residual urine volumes (PRUV) were also calculated.

RESULTS

The CB success rate was 93.15%. The NRS scores were 0.79 ± 0.19 and 0.89 ± 0.22 during probe entry and manipulation and biopsy, respectively, without any significant differences between them (p = 0.382). The mean PRUVs before and after biopsy did not differ significantly (41 ± 15.6 vs. 71.93 ± 22.3, p = 0.379). The degree of sedation, as assessed using the Ramsay scale, was 2 or 3 in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of dexmedetomidine and pethidine for CB in TRUS-Bx provided quality analgesia for the patient and prevented the development of postoperative urinary retention.

A history of neuraxial administration of local analgesics and opioids

The history of intrathecal and epidural anaesthesia is in parallel with the development of general anaesthesia. As ether anaesthesia (1846) is considered the first modern anaesthetic since its use by Morton 157 yr ago, so Bier made history by using cocaine for intrathecal anaesthesia in 1898. The first published report on opioids for intrathecal anaesthesia belongs to a Romanian surgeon, Racoviceanu-Pitesti, who presented his experience at Paris in 1901. It was almost a century before the opioids were used for epidural analgesia. Behar and his colleagues published the first report on the epidural use of morphine for the treatment of pain in The Lancet in 1979. Epidural and intrathecal opioids are today part of a routine regimen for intra- and postoperative analgesia. Over the last 30 yr, the use of epidural opioids has became a standard for analgesia in labour and delivery, and for the management of chronic pain. Finally, epidural opioids have been shown to have a pre-emptive effect, when used before major surgery. We present the evolution of neuraxial anaesthesia and the history of intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids.

Spinal anaesthesia for outpatient surgery

Spinal anaesthesia in the outpatient is characterized by rapid onset and offset, easy administration, minimal expense, and minimal side effects or complications. Spinal anaesthesia offers advantages for outpatient lower extremity, perineal, and many abdominal and gynaecological procedures. Development of small-gauge, pencil-point needles are responsible for the success of outpatient spinal anaesthesia with acceptable rates (0-2%) of postdural puncture headache (PDPH). Compared with peripheral nerve blocks, spinal anaesthesia has a more predictable offset. There are many possible choices of local anaesthetics for outpatient spinal anaesthesia. These include lidocaine, prilocaine, mepivacaine and small doses of bupivacaine. Meperidine has local anaesthetic properties in addition to its opiate properties. It has been used as the sole intrathecal agent for spinal anaesthesia but has no real advantages over lidocaine. Mepivacaine and lidocaine have each been associated with transient neurological symptoms (TNS) following intrathecal administration. This has stimulated development of alternative agents, including combinations of local anaesthetics and opioids. Lidocaine remains the most useful agent for outpatient spinal anaesthesia. For longer procedures, mepivacaine is an excellent spinal anaesthetic agent. Attention to technique, reduction of dose and addition of fentanyl to lidocaine result in effective spinal anaesthesia with rapid recovery and a low incidence of significant side effects or complications.

A history of neuraxial administration of local analgesics and opioids

The history of intrathecal and epidural anaesthesia is in parallel with the development of general anaesthesia. As ether anaesthesia (1846) is considered the first modern anaesthetic since its use by Morton 157 yr ago, so Bier made history by using cocaine for intrathecal anaesthesia in 1898. The first published report on opioids for intrathecal anaesthesia belongs to a Romanian surgeon, Racoviceanu-Pitesti, who presented his experience at Paris in 1901. It was almost a century before the opioids were used for epidural analgesia. Behar and his colleagues published the first report on the epidural use of morphine for the treatment of pain in The Lancet in 1979. Epidural and intrathecal opioids are today part of a routine regimen for intra- and postoperative analgesia. Over the last 30 yr, the use of epidural opioids has became a standard for analgesia in labour and delivery, and for the management of chronic pain. Finally, epidural opioids have been shown to have a pre-emptive effect, when used before major surgery. We present the evolution of neuraxial anaesthesia and the history of intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids.

Perineural antinociceptive effect of opioids in a rat model

BACKGROUND

The research on conductive analgesia induced by perineural opioids generated a large body of conflicting data. In this study we reassessed the antinociceptive response to perineural administration of morphine, fentanyl or meperidine in a rat model.

METHODS

Analgesia was assessed using the hind paw withdrawal latency (HPWL) response to radiant heat. The opioid dose producing 20% of maximal possible effect (20%MPE) for systemic analgesia was calculated for each drug. Then sciatic blockade was performed with the dose corresponding to 20%MPE. The injected hind paw was used to measure direct perineural effect and the contralateral hind paw was used as an indicator of systemic effect.

RESULTS

The response latency produced by morphine or fentanyl was not significantly different for ipsilateral (perineural effect) or contralateral (systemic effect) paw (27+/-11 vs. 28+/-16 and 3l+/-16 vs. 23+/-16 s, respectively). However, the meperidine group showed significantly higher %MPE for the ipsilateral paw (79+/-32 s) than for the contralateral paw (27+/-22 s).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that perineural fentanyl or morphine do not produce analgesia. Perineural block produced by meperidine was attributed to local anesthetic-like effect, rather than to drug interaction with opioid receptor.

Epidural meperidine does not cause hemodynamic changes in the term parturient

PURPOSE

Meperidine has local anesthetic properties and, therefore, when given epidurally it has the potential to cause hemodynamic changes. Our objective was to study the hemodynamic effects of an analgesic dose of epidural meperidine (50 mg) in 34 ASA 1-2 term parturients scheduled for elective Cesarean section under epidural anesthesia.

METHODS

A lumbar epidural catheter was inserted and patients lay in the supine left wedge position. Intravenous fluid preload was withheld, and hemodynamic measurements comprising of mean arterial pressure, cardiac output and heart rate were made using automatic oscillotonometry (Dinamap 1486SX) and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance (Bomed NCCOM3). Following baseline measurements, the hemodynamic effects of sequential epidural injection of first, 10 ml saline, and 20 min thereafter, 50 mg meperidine diluted to 10 ml with saline, were recorded. Sensory blockade was assessed following each injection using loss of temperature discrimination to ice. Paired Student t tests were used to compare changes in hemodynamic variables.

RESULTS

Epidural meperidine produced a small increase from the saline values in the mean (SD) cardiac output of 5.81 +/-1.44 to 6.04+/-1.54 L x min(-1) (P<0.05), and mean arterial pressure of 77.1+/-8.8 to 79.3+/-9.9 mm Hg (P<0.05). Sensory changes, the upper level of which ranged from L1 to T1, were detected in 94% of patients given epidural meperidine. Epidural saline injection had no such hemodynamic effects, but produced a detectable sensory level in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Epidural meperidine, 50 mg, caused minimal hemodynamic changes in term parturients.

Intrathecal pethidine: pharmacology and clinical applications

Pethidine is the only member of the opioid family that has clinically important local anaesthetic activity in the dose range normally used for analgesia. Pethidine is unique as the only opioid in current use that is effective as the sole agent for spinal anaesthesia. In lower doses, intrathecal pethidine is also an effective analgesic for treating pain in labour. This paper reviews the pharmacology of intrathecal pethidine and clinical experience reported to date. Articles reviewed include those identified by a Medline search using keywords "intrathecal" or "spinal anaesthesia/ anesthesia" and "pethidine" or "meperidine". Reference lists from identified papers were scrutinized to identify further relevant articles.

Spinal anesthesia with meperidine. Effects of added alpha-adrenergic agonists: epinephrine versus clonidine

We determined the effects of intrathecally administered epinephrine and clonidine on the duration and quality of a meperidine spinal block. Forty-five patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery, divided into three groups, received spinal anesthesia with 1 mg/kg 5% meperidine, alone or with 200 microg epinephrine or 2 microg/kg clonidine. Using a double-blind method, the onset, extension, and duration of sensory block (to pinprick) and the duration and degree of motor block (Bromage scale) were assessed. Hemodynamic responses, duration of postoperative analgesia, degree of sedation, and occurrence of side effects were also recorded. The addition of epinephrine to the meperidine solution prolonged the sensory block (P<0.01) but did not affect its onset or extent. A similar potentiating effect was demonstrated for clonidine (P<0.001). The duration and degree of motor block were increased by addition of both epinephrine and clonidine. A tendency toward bradycardia and a decrease of mean arterial pressure was potentiated by clonidine but not by the epinephrine. Only the addition of clonidine prolonged the postoperative analgesia (P<0.001), but was associated with an increased sedation score. The incidence of other side effects did not differ between the groups. We conclude that coadministration of epinephrine or clonidine with meperidine enhances the duration and degree of spinal anesthesia and that adding clonidine prolongs the duration of postoperative analgesia.

A comparison of the local anesthetic effects of meperidine, fentanyl, and sufentanil on dorsal root axons

The local anesthetic effects of opioids have been demonstrated in both clinical and laboratory studies. Clinically, both meperidine and sufentanil can produce segmental sensory anesthesia. However, previous studies of the effects of opioids on nerve conduction have all made use of peripheral nerve preparations and yielded conflicting results. In the present study we describe the local anesthetic effects of phenylpiperidine opioids on individual dorsal root axons, the probable target for intrathecal local anesthetics. Dorsal roots were removed from anesthetized adult male rats and maintained in vitro. Standard single fiber recording techniques were used to isolate activity in the individual axons. Drug exposure was accomplished by perfusing the isolated dorsal root with an artificial cerebrospinal fluid containing the study drug at a clinically relevant concentration. Steady-state drug effects were measured after 15-30 min of exposure and compared to control measurements in the same preparation. Meperidine (705 microM) blocked conduction in 61.5% of 39 myelinated and unmyelinated axons, and significantly reduced conduction velocity in the remaining unblocked axons. These effects were not naloxone reversible. Fentanyl (0.6 microM and 3 microM) and sufentanil (1.04 microM) failed to affect the nerve conduction in any dorsal root axon. The discrepancy between laboratory and clinical observations is discussed. We suggest that the site of conduction block may occur at the proximal end of the dorsal root as it passes through the dorsal root entry zone, an anatomically unique segment of the primary sensory pathway with decreased conduction safety for action potential propagation.

[Neurotoxicity of intrathecally administrated agents]

Spinal anaesthetics can induce histopathologic lesions and regional haemodynamic alterations in the spinal cord. There are numerous causes of neurologic lesions, including direct trauma of the spinal cord and nerve roots during puncture or catheter insertion, compromised spinal cord perfusion and direct neurotoxic effect. Histopathologic lesions are localized either in meninges (meningitis or arachnoiditis) or in neuraxis (myelitis or axonal degeneration). Neurotoxicity can result from decrease in neuronal blood supply, elicited by high concentrations of the solutions, long duration exposure to local anaesthetics, and the use of adjuvants. They have been implicated in the occurrence of cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric solution of lidocaine and tetracaine given through small diameter catheters. Selective spinal analgesia is induced by spinal opioids without motor blockade except for meperidine. Complications occurred in patients after high doses of morphine, which were related to one of its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide. Preservative-free opioid solutions are to be preferred for spinal anaesthesia. There is no report of neurotoxicity neither in animal studies, nor in humans, using spinal clonidine. In order to reduce the incidence of neurotoxicity, some safety rules should be followed. The lowest efficient dose of local anaesthetics must be given. Incomplete blockade should not necessarily lead to a reinjection. Large volume of hyperbaric lidocaine or repeated injections of such solutions must be avoided as well as preservative-containing solutions. The administration of new compounds by the spinal route must be supported by data of spinal neuropharmacology and the lack of neurotoxicity must have been previously checked with animal studies.

Intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine

Forty-five ASA physical status I volunteers, divided in three groups of 15 each, received intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) of the upper limb with 40 mL meperidine 0.25%, lidocaine 0.5%, or 0.9% sodium chloride (isolated ischemia) by random allocation. Using a double-blind method, the onset and recovery of sensory block was tested at six sites of the forearm and hand. The onset of complete motor block was also assessed. The symptoms after deflation of the tourniquet were recorded. The onset of block, as determined by pin-prick touch, and cold was significantly faster in the meperidine group (P < 0.001) than in the saline group, but also slower (P < 0.001) than in the lidocaine group. After the tourniquet was deflated, recovery occurred in reverse order. A complete motor block was noted in all volunteers from the meperidine and lidocaine groups, but in only 11 cases from the 0.9% sodium chloride group (P < 0.01). In the meperidine group, motor block developed concomitantly or prior to sensory block. There was a significant increase in the incidence of dizziness, nausea, and pain at the injection site in the meperidine group in comparison with the lidocaine group. We conclude that meperidine has local anesthetic action on the peripheral nerve in vivo, but that its single use for IVRA should be a second choice for patients allergic to local anesthetics.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects of the combination of meperidine and prilocaine for spinal anaesthesia

The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of a small dose of prilocaine could augment the spinal block induced by meperidine and affect intrathecal meperidine pharmacokinetic behaviour. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in 60 men scheduled for endoscopic resection of a prostatic adenoma or bladder tumour under spinal anaesthesia. They were allocated randomly to receive either 1 mg.kg-1 meperidine (Group 1, n = 30), or 1 mg.kg-1 meperidine plus 0.5 mg.kg-1 prilocaine (Group 2, n = 30). Blood samples were collected prior to and for 24 hr after spinal injection in 24 patients (12 in each group). Plasma meperidine levels were assayed by gas chromatography. Complete motor block was achieved in all Group 2 patients, but was incomplete in seven of Group 1 (P less than 0.05). The onset of both motor and sensory blocks was shorter (P less than 0.01) in Group 2 and the duration was longer (P less than 0.05). Coadministration of prilocaine modifies meperidine pharmacokinetic behaviour. The area under curve was 48% greater (P less than 0.01) and Cmax was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1, 145.8 +/- 42.2 vs 107 +/- 20.5 ng.ml-1 (P less than 0.001). No evidence of respiratory depression was noted in any of the patients. Despite the increase in plasma meperidine concentrations, no side effects were observed. The plasma concentrations remained at one third to one sixth the levels reported to induce a respiratory depression. It is concluded that the addition of prilocaine to meperidine improves motor and sensory block during surgery and alters meperidine kinetics without producing major side effects.

A dose-range study of intrathecal meperidine combined with bupivacaine

Twenty-one patients were included in a randomized study to receive either 10 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine alone or combined with 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 mg.kg-1 meperidine for spinal anaesthesia. Sensory blockade was assessed by pin prick, motor blockade by the Bromage scale, and postoperative analgesia by VAS scores and by the time before the first demand for analgesia. Spinal meperidine did not change the duration of sensory blockade, but induced a dose-related increase in postoperative efficient analgesia. Spinal meperidine might be considered as a means to obtain postoperative analgesia in the hours immediately following surgery.

Effects of perineural opioids on nerve conduction of N. suralis in man

In this study the effects of agonist acting drugs (morphine sulphate, fentanyl citrate and meperidine hydrochloride) on nerve conduction were studied in 43 healthy young volunteers divided into four groups randomly. According to analgesic equivalent doses, the first group received 2 mg morphine sulphate, the second group 0.02 mg fentanyl citrate, the third group 20 mg meperidine hydrochloride, and as control the fourth group received 2 ml of saline. The latencies, amplitudes of the responses and nerve conduction velocities were obtained immediately before and every 5 min after injections up to 30 min. No significant change was observed within or among the morphine sulphate, fentanyl citrate and saline groups whereas in the meperidine hydrochloride group the amplitudes diminished significantly and this finding was still apparent at 30 min. Four of the cases displayed complete blocks. Nerve conduction velocity did not change in the other 6 cases. The significant decrement of the amplitude of the compound nerve action potential in the meperidine hydrochloride group is probably due to local anesthetic-like action of this drug. Morphine sulphate, fentanyl citrate or saline did not show this effect.

Comparison of intrathecal meperidine and lidocaine in endoscopic urological procedures

The purpose of this study was to determine if a small dose of intrathecal meperidine would achieve adequate spinal anaesthesia while minimizing complications and to compare its effectiveness with lidocaine. The spinal anaesthetic effects of five per cent lidocaine 0.5 mg.kg-1 in 7.5 percent glucose (n = 20) or five per cent meperidine 0.5 mg.kg-1 (n = 22) were evaluated in 42 ASA physical status II or III patients. Intrathecal injection of the anaesthetic agent was given with the patient in the sitting position in which he remained for ten minutes before being placed in the lithotomy position. The onset time for sensory blockade was seven minutes in the lidocaine group and ten minutes in the meperidine group. Final sensory levels were identical in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure decreased significantly in the lidocaine group but not in the meperidine group. Motor block was absent in ten patients in the meperidine group but was present in all the patients in the lidocaine group. Duration of postoperative analgesia was 968 min in the meperidine group and 681 min in the lidocaine group (NS). Complications such as nausea, vomiting, itching, drowsiness and respiratory depression were similar in the two groups. It is concluded that low-dose meperidine, 0.5 mg.kg-1, is effective as a spinal anaesthetic agent and has few complications.

[Use of morphinomimetics in regional anesthesia]

Pain relief is one of medicine's most important challenges and the first aim of anaesthesia. The most common technique of postoperative analgesia remains intramuscular or subcutaneous opiates. There has been a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of opiates over the last decade, and new techniques and methods of administration have been developed especially their regional application. In 1979, two reports acted as catalysts to promote further studies. Wang et al. reported on the efficacy of intrathecal morphine to relieve unbearable malignant pain in 8 patients whereas Behar et al reported on the efficacy of morphine by epidural route. More recently, several studies pointed out the usefulness of the peripheral perineural route for opiates. However, this remains controversial, as some discrepancies persist in the results. The classification of opiate receptors and their relationship to opiate analgesia, as well as the mechanisms of action of regionally administered opiates are analyzed. The dual pre- and postsynaptic actions of spinal opiates are then considered. The parts played by the different neurotransmitters and pathways are set out. The evidence for opiate receptors at peripheral nerve sites and the different hypotheses suggested to explain the effect of opiates given by the perineural route are discussed. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of opiates given by the subarachnoid and epidural routes are considered, in particular with respect to the comparative pharmacology of the commonly used opiates. The adverse effects of spinal opiates are reviewed, with their potential risks, and their clinical and therapeutic implications. Opiates and local anaesthetics given by the spinal route are compared. The clinical applications of intrathecal and epidural opiates are discussed, especially in the fields of postoperative analgesia, treatment of chest trauma, and cancer pain. Lastly, the few controlled studies concerning the use of opiates in peripheral nerve blocks, especially brachial plexus blocks, and the prospects of this new technique of giving opiates regionally are discussed.

Epidural sufentanil for intra- and postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery: a comparative study with intravenous sufentanil

A comparative study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of epidural sufentanil in providing intra- and postoperative analgesia during thoracic surgery. Sufentanil was chosen on the basis of its high lipid solubility and its potent opiate receptor binding. Epidural sufentanil was compared with intravenous sufentanil as the major intraoperative analgetic agent in an anesthesia regimen with midazolam and nitrous oxide. Epidural sufentanil significantly decreased the need for supplementary intravenous analgesia. In the epidural sufentanil group the immediate postoperative analgesia was found to be better, with a longer duration of action, compared with the intravenous sufentanil group. Postoperatively epidural sufentanil was compared with epidural morphine. Sufentanil provided good analgesia with a very fast onset and a mean duration of almost 7 h. Severe respiratory depression was observed in one patient within 1 h of extubation, probably due to the combined effects of the narcotic administration and residual midazolam. It is concluded that 50 micrograms of sufentanil administered in the thoracic epidural space provides valuable intraoperative analgesia which can easily be extended into the postoperative period, although all necessary precautions for epidural opiate administration should be taken.

The relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of spinal opioids. Minireview based on a doctoral thesis

Spinal opioids have been used clinically since the late seventies to treat acute, traumatic, obstetric and chronic pain. In this article the influence of the pharmacokinetics on the dynamics of intrathecal and epidural opioid administration are discussed with reference to current knowledge.

[Motor block induced by spinal injection of pethidine. Quantification and comparison with lidocaine]

Intrathecal pethidine (or meperidine) at a dose of 1 mg.kg-1 has proved to be effective and useful for surgical procedures by producing a spinal nerve block due to its local anaesthetic properties. Motor blockade was assessed by dynamometric measurement of the dorsal flexion of foot in ten ASA I patients after subarachnoid pethidine, and in seven ASA I patients after subarachnoid 5% lidocaine at the same dosage. Measurements were made every 5 min during the first 30 min, then every 15 min until complete motor block recovery was obtained. Values were expressed as a percentage of the initial muscle strength registered before lumbar puncture. The two drugs gave a dramatic and similar decrease in muscle strength (92 vs 95%; NS). However, the delay of maximal effect was significantly longer with pethidine than with lidocaine (33.5 +/- 14 min vs 19 +/- 5.6 min; p less than 0.05). The duration of the motor blockade was similar for both drugs (116 vs 106 min) and the 25%-75% time intervals were identical (32 +/- 14 min vs 33 +/- 12.6 min). Two severe respiratory depressions were observed with pethidine, which were rapidly reversible by intravenous naloxone. Numerous other minor side-effects occurred more frequently with meperidine than with lidocaine. It was concluded that dynamometry gave an accurate description of motor blockade induced by spinal anaesthesia.

[Pharmacokinetics of pethidine after spinal anesthesia. Clinical implications]

Eleven male patients undergoing endoscopic resection for prostatic adenoma and bladder tumours under spinal anaesthesia received intrathecal pethidine 1 mg X kg-1. Plasma concentration and its evolution with time were assessed; pethidine plasma concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Pethidine was rapidly and extensively absorbed. The peak plasma concentration of pethidine was 176 +/- 66 ng X ml-1 (range: 84-208) and the time to peak concentration was 2.3 +/- 1.4 h (range: 0.5-6 h). The terminal elimination half-life was 7.2 +/- 2.2 h (range: 4-11.5 h). The plasma concentrations of pethidine remained below 500-700 ng X ml-1, the minimum concentration necessary to obtain a systemic analgesic effect. Two patients required noramidopyrine as a complement at the 8th and 12th h respectively. No respiratory depression was observed. Intrathecal pethidine (1 mg X kg-1) was an effective agent for spinal anaesthesia: the prolonged postoperative analgesia was due to the drug acting on opioid receptors in the spinal cord. This led to the necessity of postoperative monitoring during 24 h after intrathecal pethidine administration.

Extradural and parenteral pethidine as analgesia after total hip replacement: effects and kinetics. A controlled clinical study

Twenty-one patients who had undergone total hip replacement were randomly assigned to one of three groups in order to compare a single dose of 1 mg/kg of pethidine im (I) and 20 mg (II) or 60 mg of extradural pethidine (III) in a double-blind design. The degree of analgesia, the adverse effects, and the kinetics were studied for 18 h. Pain was monitored using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Supplementary doses of oxycodone if required were given no earlier than 0.75 h after pethidine. Plasma concentrations of pethidine were measured with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS). Hypoalgesia to pin prick test was evaluated. Low pain scores were observed in the extradural groups between 0.25 and 1.5 h after the dose. A significant difference in pain score compared with the im group was found after the higher extradural dose only between 0.5 and 1 h (p less than 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of pain score versus time (0-18 h) was not significantly different between groups. The recorded adverse effects were minor in all three groups. The terminal half-lives and plasma clearances of pethidine, and the time to peak concentration were not different between the groups. Single patients in the extradural groups showed hypoalgesia to pin prick in parallel to the effect. The present study shows that extradural pethidine produces shortlived analgesia, in contrast to the long-lasting effect of morphine found in other studies.

Spinal anaesthesia with meperidine as the sole agent

Twenty male patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing surgery of the perineal or inguinal areas received intrathecal meperidine in a dose of 1 mg X kg-1 as the sole anaesthetic agent. There was sensory and motor block within ten minutes of intrathecal injection of meperidine and surgery was performed with complete analgesia. The duration of surgery was 39.7 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD) minutes. Prolonged postoperative analgesia was obtained and some patients did not require additional narcotic analgesic during the postoperative period, lasting up to seven days. Side effects included nausea and vomiting (six patients), hypotension (five patients), pruritus (five patients) and urinary retention (two patients). There was no early or late respiratory depression. It is concluded that intrathecal meperidine in a dose of 1 mg X kg-1 is effective as the sole agent for spinal anaesthesia and produces prolonged postoperative analgesia. It offers an advantage for such painful operations as haemorrhoidectomy and anal fissurectomy where its prolonged analgesic effect is desirable. It could also serve as an alternative agent for spinal anaesthesia when a local anaesthetic is not available.