[The good use of antibiotics in intensive care: results of a program for rationalization of prescriptions]

Knowledge translation interventions for critically ill patients: a systematic review*

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed ICU-based knowledge translation studies to assess the impact of knowledge translation interventions on processes and outcomes of care.

DATA SOURCES

We searched electronic databases (to July, 2010) without language restrictions and hand-searched reference lists of relevant studies and reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing any ICU-based knowledge translation intervention (e.g., protocols, guidelines, and audit and feedback) to management without a knowledge translation intervention. We focused on clinical topics that were addressed in greater than or equal to five studies.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pairs of reviewers abstracted data on the clinical topic, knowledge translation intervention(s), process of care measures, and patient outcomes. For each individual or combination of knowledge translation intervention(s) addressed in greater than or equal to three studies, we summarized each study using median risk ratio for dichotomous and standardized mean difference for continuous process measures. We used random-effects models. Anticipating a small number of randomized controlled trials, our primary meta-analyses included randomized controlled trials and observational studies. In separate sensitivity analyses, we excluded randomized controlled trials and collapsed protocols, guidelines, and bundles into one category of intervention. We conducted meta-analyses for clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay) related to interventions that were associated with improvements in processes of care.

DATA SYNTHESIS

From 11,742 publications, we included 119 investigations (seven randomized controlled trials, 112 observational studies) on nine clinical topics. Interventions that included protocols with or without education improved continuous process measures (seven observational studies and one randomized controlled trial; standardized mean difference [95% CI]: 0.26 [0.1, 0.42]; p = 0.001 and four observational studies and one randomized controlled trial; 0.83 [0.37, 1.29]; p = 0.0004, respectively). Heterogeneity among studies within topics ranged from low to extreme. The exclusion of randomized controlled trials did not change our results. Single-intervention and lower-quality studies had higher standardized mean differences compared to multiple-intervention and higher-quality studies (p = 0.013 and 0.016, respectively). There were no associated improvements in clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge translation interventions in the ICU that include protocols with or without education are associated with the greatest improvements in processes of critical care.

[Good clinical practices and inpatient antibiotics: optimization of fluoroquinolone switch therapy]

OBJECTIVE

Intravenous-to-oral switch therapy is strongly recommended in the medical literature. The aim of this study was to assess how we can improve fluoroquinolone switch therapy.

METHODS

In this comparative prospective study, we analyzed 243 intravenous ciprofloxacin treatments and assessed the impact of promoting a switch to oral step-down therapy.

RESULTS

This study found that switches from intravenous to oral therapy increased, mainly in medical wards, and led to significant savings in direct costs.

DISCUSSION

Promoting switch therapy has improved clinical practices in antibiotic use and led to lower direct and probably indirect drug-related costs.

CONCLUSION

Our findings will help define the role of switch therapy in improving clinical practices in inpatient antibiotic use.

L'hygiène hospitalière et le conseil en antibiothérapie : un duo opérationnel face au problème de la diffusion des bactéries multirésistantes aux antibiotiques

OBJECTIVES

The authors had for aim to show that preventing the diffusion of multidrug-resistant organism (MRO) is possible thanks to the coordination of recommended preventive actions and the implementation of a sensible anti-infective prescription policy. They also wanted to highlight the role played by the nursing care staff in enforcing recommendations.

METHOD

We compared the results of two health care facilities having both implemented the same strategy aimed at preventing cross-transmission and prescribing anti-infective drugs.

RESULTS

Audits reported a very variable enforcement of recommendations. The results obtained from microbiological monitoring confirmed the essential impact of protocol enactment by every team, on the control of MRO diffusion. The antibiotherapy specialist has a key role in the suggested strategy, allowing a significant decrease in the number of anti-infective prescriptions and a more rational use.

CONCLUSION

The collaboration of a hygiene specialist with an antibiotherapy specialist has proved operational in the fight against MRO diffusion, as long as the competences of both specialists are acknowledged and their cross-disciplinary activities accepted. For the entire staff, enacting a corporate culture is a crucial asset.