Gene diagnosis and clinical management of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)

Familial pituitary tumor syndromes

The vast majority of pituitary tumors are benign and occur sporadically; however, they can still result in significant morbidity and even premature mortality through mass effects and hormone dysfunction. The etiology of sporadic tumors is still poorly understood; by contrast, advances have been made in our understanding of familial pituitary adenoma syndromes in the past decade. Currently, four genes are known to be associated with familial pituitary tumor syndromes: MEN1, CDKN1B, PRKAR1A and AIP. The first three genes are associated with a variety of extrapituitary pathologies, for example, primary hyperparathyroidism with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, which might aid identification of these syndromes. By contrast, AIP mutations seem to occur in the setting of isolated familial pituitary adenomas, particularly of the growth-hormone-secreting subtype. Awareness and identification of familial pituitary tumor syndromes is important because of potential associated pathologies and important implications for family members. Here, we review the current knowledge of familial pituitary tumor syndromes.

MEN1 gene analysis in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: 10-year experience of a single institution for thyroid and parathyroid care in Japan

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease. Primary hyperparathyroidism is known to occur at an early age in MEN1 patients. In MEN1 patients, special care regarding not only surgery for hyperparathyroidism but also other MEN1-related tumors is required. Between 1998 and 2007, 482 patients, including 16 whose hyperparathyroidism was discovered by family screening for MEN1, underwent surgical therapy for primary hyperparathyroidism at our institution. We recommended MEN1 gene analysis for patients having one of the following clinicopathological features: 1) age younger than 30 years old; 2) enlargement of multiple glands; 3) coexistence or presence of past history of MEN1-related tumors; or 4) family history of hyperparathyroidism or MEN1-related tumors. Sixty patients had at least one of the above features and were recommended for genetic analysis. Thirty-nine of these patients consented to undergo MEN1 genetic analysis and 16 (41%) showed MEN1 mutation. Pathological examination confirmed multiglandular parathyroid hyperplasia in 15 cases. Subject to this strategy, MEN1 index patients in Japan could be detected efficiently and selected for appropriate therapies for hyperparathyroidism and MEN1-related tumors.

Surgical treatment of non-functioning pancreatic islet cell tumors

Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are rare neoplasms originating from the amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation (APUD) stem cells. Although the majority of PETs are sporadic, they frequently occur in familial syndromes. PETs may cause a variety of functional syndromes or symptoms of local progression if they are non-functional. General neuroendocrine tumor markers are highly sensitive in the diagnostic assessment of a PET. Imaging studies for tumor localization and staging include computer tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), In(111)-octreotide scan, MIBG, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Treatment of PETs often requires a multi-modality approach; however, surgical resection remains the only curative therapy for localized (non-metastatic) disease. Treatment of metastatic disease includes biologic agents, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and liver-directed therapies.

Detection of an MEN1 gene mutation depends on clinical features and supports current referral criteria for diagnostic molecular genetic testing

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic molecular genetic testing for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) has been available since the identification of the MEN1 gene in 1997. Mutation screening of the MEN1 gene has been recommended for patients who meet clinical criteria for MEN1 (at least two of the following: parathyroid hyperplasia, pancreatic endocrine tumour or pituitary adenoma) and those in whom a diagnosis of MEN1 is suspected. We examined the appropriateness of these clinical criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 292 patients were referred for diagnostic testing. The coding region of the MEN1 gene was sequenced in 186 index cases and mutation testing was requested for 106 subjects, including 83 asymptomatic relatives.

RESULTS

MEN1 gene mutations were identified in 68/186 index cases (37%). Twenty-nine of the 60 MEN1 mutations reported are novel. The likelihood of finding a mutation was correlated with the number of MEN1-related tumours (mutation detection rate of 79%, 37% and 15% in patients with three, two and one main MEN1-related tumours; P < or = 0.00001) and increased in the presence of a family history (mutation detection rate of 91%, 69% and 29%vs. 69%, 23% and 0% in sporadic cases with three, two or one main MEN1-related tumours, respectively; P < or = 0.00001). The pick-up rate in the 83% of subjects who met proposed criteria for diagnostic testing was 42%, but in those who did not meet these criteria this fell to 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of finding an MEN1 mutation depends on the clinical features of the patient and their family. This large series supports present referral criteria for diagnostic mutation screening, but suggests that patients with sporadic isolated tumours rarely have MEN1 mutations.