Quand ne pas appliquer le traitement standard de la tuberculose maladie ?

[Practical issues in the management of tuberculosis disease]

INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis disease warrants standard therapeutic management as detailed in a guide published by the High Authority for Health (HAS) following the publication of the Public Health Law in 2004.

METHODS

The medical services of the régime social des indépendants (RSI) carried out a national survey by targeting patients who, in 2011, were reimbursed for tuberculosis treatment or were admitted for long-term tuberculosis disease. Their physicians were contacted to detail the care pathway and treatment they had received.

RESULTS

A total of 148 tuberculosis disease patients were enrolled, of whom 71.6% had respiratory localization of their disease. The diagnosis was made in healthcare institutions in 84.5% of cases. Standard treatment (phases 1 and 2) was used in 30.1% of cases. The recommended quadruple therapy was given in 55.2% of treatments in phase 1 and in accordance with the time recommended in 62.9% of cases. Phase 2 was the recommended two drugs combination therapy 80.4% of the time with the treatment duration respected in 51.0% of treatments. The difference from standard treatment was explained by the detection of health or social events in only 39.0% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This survey allows us to highlight a relative lack of knowledge of standard treatment as recommended by the HAS.

[Thrombocytopenia induced by rifampicin not previously sensitized: a case presentation]

Thrombocytopenia induced by rifampicin in the absence of prior sensitization is exceptional, especially when it occurs in a patient without risk factors. We report the case of a patient aged 25 years with no past history of medical, surgical or knowledge of having taken rifampicin previously, who was hospitalized for treatment of thrombocytopenic purpura occurring after the initiation of fixed combination quadruple therapy (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol) for pulmonary tuberculosis. The biological pretreatment and therapeutic education had not been made. The patient presented with thrombocytopenic purpura 30000/mm(3) on day 9 after the initiation of treatment. The platelet count returned to normal 10 days after discontinuation of treatment. We elected not to reintroduce rifampicin given the strong likelihood that it was responsible for this complication. We conducted a phased reintroduction of isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. No recurrence of the thrombocytopenia occurred. Thus, the diagnosis of rifampicin-induced thrombocytopenia appears to have been confirmed and the patient tolerated the remainder of their treatment well.

[Managing the adverse events of antitubercular agents]

Tuberculosis, an infectious disease which is curable by following a course of antibiotics, remains a major public health issue on a global scale. A therapeutic strategy has been standardised which calls for the use of four antibiotics. These are generally well-tolerated but, individually and in combination, frequently have undesirable effects. Isoniazid may cause hepatic toxicity and an also be an asue of peripheral neuropathy. Rifampin is a strong hepatic enzyme inducer and can be responsible for severe immunoallergic reactions in the case of interrupted treatment. Pyrazinamide sometimes results in severe hepatotoxicity. Ethambutol can be responsible for severe ocular toxicity. Both older antituberculous medications and new generation antibiotic medications used for the treatment of resistant bacilli can also be the source of adverse events. The treatment of tuberculosis is standardised but the decision to treat it is inseparable from the evaluation of possible side effects which require assessment prior to the initiation of therapy and close monitoring during treatment which includes ensuring that patients are aware of and vigilant for potential problems.This work describes the adverse events of different antibiotic medications so that, on an individual basis they can be anticipated and appropriately managed.

[Use of moxifloxacin in tuberculosis regimen in a French teaching hospital]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate retrospectively indications of moxifloxacin prescriptions in inpatients with tuberculosis in a referent teaching hospital.

DESIGN

All patients hospitalized at Bichat-Claude Bernard hospital and who had an active tuberculosis disease with a tuberculosis regimen including moxifloxacin were included. Medical charts were retrospectively reviewed for all these patients over 21 months. Data collected were reasons for introduction of moxifloxacin in regimen.

RESULTS

Out of the 23 patients included in the study, 13 of them had a recurrence of tuberculosis. Several reasons for introduction of moxifloxacin were recorded and one prescription can be associated with one or more reasons: an extra pulmonary tuberculosis or disseminated tuberculosis (16 cases), an intolerance to other anti-tuberculosis drugs (13 cases), a medical history of therapeutic failure or a proved or suspected drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (12 cases) or to avoid drug interactions (two cases).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study in our hospital highlights that drug-resistance was not the first reason for introduction of moxifloxacin in anti-tuberculosis regimen. One major indication was bad tolerance to other first-line regimen drugs. A better supervision of the moxifloxacin prescription in tuberculosis regimen is needed in order to limit its ecological impact.