Comment explorer en première intention les muscles respiratoires ?

Determination of the minimal important difference for inspiratory muscle strength in people with severe and very severe COPD

OBJECTIVE

Inspiratory muscle training is recommended for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with inspiratory muscle weakness. Clinical interpretation of changes in inspiratory muscle strength could be helped by the determination of cut-off values. The aim of this study was to estimate the minimal important difference for inspiratory muscle strength assessed with maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in people with COPD.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (EMI2 study) including people with severe to very severe COPD undergoing a pulmonary rehabilitation program was conducted. The determination of the minimal important difference was realized using both anchor-based and distribution-based methods.

SETTING

The study includes patients admitted to the rehabilitation program unit of the Centre Hospitalier des Pays de Morlaix (Morlaix, France) between March 5, 2014 and September 8, 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-three people with severe to very severe COPD (age 62.2  ±  8.0 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 36.4  ±  9.5% of theoretical) were analyzed.

INTERVENTION

Patients followed a standardized pulmonary rehabilitation program 5 days a week for 4 weeks. The program included aerobic training, ground-based outdoor walking training, and strengthening of lower and upper limb muscles.

MAIN MEASURES

At the end of the pulmonary rehabilitation program, MIP improved by 14.8  ±  14.9 cmH2O (p < 0.05). Regarding the anchor-based method, only the modified Medical Research Council was selected as an appropriate anchor. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis reported a minimal important difference of 13.5 cmH2O (sensibility: 75% specificity: 67.5%). Using distribution-based methods, the estimate of minimal important difference was 7.9 cmH2O (standard error of measurement method) and 10.9 cmH2O (size effect method).

RESULTS

The estimations proposed by this study ranged from 7.9 to 13.5 cmH2O.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of minimal important difference is a simple tool for assessing the changes of inspiratory muscle strength during a pulmonary rehabilitation program. We propose a minimal important difference of 13.5 cmH2O for the improvement of MIP. Further studies are needed to confirm this estimation.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02074813.

[Inspiratory muscle training during pulmonary rehabilitation]

INTRODUCTION

Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is part of the management of patients with pulmonary diseases during rehabilitation. Since the last recommendations of the Société de pneumologie de langue française, several studies have focused on the role of inspiratory muscle training during pulmonary rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND

IMT, in comparison to standard care or sham-IMT, improves the strength and endurance of the inspiratory muscles, decreases dyspnoea during the activities of daily living, improves walking distance and quality of life. However, the different studies did not show an additional effect of IMT during a pulmonary rehabilitation program compared to a rehabilitation program without IMT, with regard to improvement of exercise capacity and quality of life.

OUTLOOK

One study showed an improvement in dyspnoea of effort, but these results are yet to be confirmed. Finally, it seems appropriate to associate IMT with an exercise-training program before chest or abdominal surgery, even if further studies are necessary.

CONCLUSION

During a pulmonary rehabilitation program, IMT does not provide additional benefits. However, when patients cannot perform a global exercise training, IMT has shown benefit. IMT provides additional benefits in pre-operative programs.

[Inspiratory muscles strength training in recreational athletes]

INTRODUCTION

Respiratory muscles strength and endurance influence athletic performance. Besides conventional spirometry, sniff test, inspiratory and expiratory maximal pressures can directly assess respiratory muscle strength. Respiratory muscles can be train through a device offering inspiratory and expiratory resistance.

METHODS

Nineteen subjects aged 18 to 30 years and practicing leisure sport trained inspiratory muscles on Powerbreathe(®) for eight weeks. Resistance was set at 85% of maximal inspiratory pressure determined during a preliminary session. Evaluation was made trough voluntary and non-invasive methods on Macro 5000(®) (PI max, PE max and sniff test).

RESULTS

An increase of 21.77% of the maximum inspiratory pressure, 17% of the maximum expiratory pressure and 18% of the sniff test are recorded after eight weeks of training.

CONCLUSIONS

A specific training of inspiratory muscles (Powerbreathe(®) Sports performance) increases the power of these muscles (voluntary and non-invasive tests).