[Lung cancer in the elderly: performance status and/or geriatric indices?]

Excess mortality and undertreatment in elderly lung cancer patients: treatment nihilism in the modern era?

Treatment of elderly patients with lung cancer is significantly hindered by concerns about treatment tolerability, toxicity and limited clinical trial data in the elderly; potentially giving rise to treatment nihilism amongst clinicians. This study aims to describe survival in elderly patients with lung cancer and explore potential causes for excess mortality.

Patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry between 2011–2018 were analysed (n=3481). Patients were age-categorised and compared using Cox-regression modelling to determine mortality risk, after adjusting for confounding. Probability of being offered cancer treatments was also determined, further stratified by disease stage.

The eldest patients (≥80 years old) had significantly shorter median survival compared with younger age groups (<60 years: 2.0 years; 60–69 years: 1.5 years; 70–79 years: 1.6 years; ≥80 years: 1.0 years; p<0.001). Amongst those diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 lung cancer, there was no significant difference in adjusted-mortality between age groups. However, in those diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 disease, the eldest patients had an increased adjusted-mortality risk of 28% compared with patients younger than 60 years old (p=0.005), associated with markedly reduced probability of cancer treatment, after controlling for sex, performance status, comorbidities and histology type (OR 0.24, compared with <60 years old strata; p<0.001).

Compared to younger patients, older patients with advanced-stage lung cancer have a disproportionately higher risk of mortality and lower likelihood of receiving cancer treatments, even when performance status and comorbidity are equivalent. These healthcare inequities could be indicative of widespread treatment nihilism towards elderly patients.

Treatment strongly determines lung cancer survival, yet nihilism may threaten treatment provision and survival outcomes. Older patients in this cohort had reduced multidisciplinary presentation, less treatment (OR 0.24) and 28% increased mortality risk.https://bit.ly/2ZGotj0

Multidisciplinary decision-making regarding chemotherapy for lung cancer patients-An age-based comparison

Optimising decision-making in elderly patients is becoming increasingly urgent. We analysed treatment decisions and course of therapy for patients with lung cancer in different age categories: <65, 65-75, and 75 years and older. About 349 patients with lung cancer (median age 67.8 years), discussed at the multidisciplinary team meeting in the Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands, were reviewed. Multidisciplinary decision-making and subsequent clinical course were extracted from medical files. We found that 39% of eligible patients older than 75 years of age started treatment with chemotherapy compared to 80% of the younger patients (<65 and 65-75). When patients did receive chemotherapy, primary and secondary treatment adaptations were effectuated in 58%: for patients aged <65 in 49%, for patients aged 65-75 and >75 years in 66%. For 44% of all patients treated with chemotherapy, unplanned hospital admissions were required: in 42% for the patients <65, in 52% for those aged 65-75 and in 27% for >75 years. The decision-making process and course of treatment for lung cancer vary per age category. In particular, patients between 65 and 75 years of age might be more frail than initially thought. Age and frailty are important characteristics that need more attention.

[Non-small cell lung cancer irradiation in elderly]

People over the age of 65 are often excluded from participation in oncological clinical trials. However, more than half of patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer are older than 65 years. Any therapeutic strategy must be discussed in multidisciplinary meetings after adapted geriatric assessment. Patients who benefit from the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of Balducci and Extermann are those whose G8 screening tool score is less than or equal to 14. Age itself does not contraindicate a curative therapeutic approach. Stereotactic radiotherapy is an alternative to surgery for early stages in elderly patients who are medically inoperable or who refuse surgery, because it significantly increases overall survival. Mostly sequential (rarely concomitant) chemoradiotherapy can be proposed to elderly patients with locally advanced stages in good general state of health. For the others, an exclusive palliative radiotherapy, a single or dual agent of chemotherapy, a targeted drug or best supportive care only may be discussed.

Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Geriatric assessment is a multidisciplinary diagnostic process that evaluates the older adult's medical, psychological, social, and functional capacity. No systematic review of the use of geriatric assessment in oncology has been conducted. The goals of this systematic review were: 1) to provide an overview of all geriatric assessment instruments used in the oncology setting; 2) to examine the feasibility and psychometric properties of those instruments; and 3) to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of geriatric assessment in predicting or modifying outcomes (including the impact on treatment decision making, toxicity of treatment, and mortality).

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Psychinfo, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library for articles published in English, French, Dutch, or German between January 1, 1996, and November 16, 2010, reporting on cross-sectional, longitudinal, interventional, or observational studies that assessed the feasibility or effectiveness of geriatric assessment instruments. The quality of articles was evaluated using relevant quality assessment frameworks.

RESULTS

We identified 83 articles that reported on 73 studies. The quality of most studies was poor to moderate. Eleven studies examined psychometric properties or diagnostic accuracy of the geriatric assessment instruments used. The assessment generally took 10-45 min. Geriatric assessment was most often completed to describe a patient's health and functional status. Specific domains of geriatric assessment were associated with treatment toxicity in 6 of 9 studies and with mortality in 8 of 16 studies. Of the four studies that examined the impact of geriatric assessment on the cancer treatment decision, two found that geriatric assessment impacted 40%-50% of treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric assessment in the oncology setting is feasible, and some domains are associated with adverse outcomes. However, there is limited evidence that geriatric assessment impacted treatment decision making. Further research examining the effectiveness of geriatric assessment on treatment decisions and outcomes is needed.

[Pain and primary lung cancer in the elderly]

The study of pain in elderly patients with a primary lung cancer (PLC) deserves special attention particularly because this symptom is frequently associated with the condition and influences the management and prognosis. To study the characteristics of pain due to PLC in the elderly, we prospectively evaluated pain in all patients aged over 65 years admitted for PLC. Thirty-nine elderly patients were enrolled in 15 months (62% of all PLC). The average age was 72 years. The cancer was advanced NSCLC in most cases. Pain was present in 74.3%. It was significantly less common among those over 75 years (50% versus 85.1%; P<0.05). The pain, mild in most cases, worsened during follow-up in 55.5%. The last mean visual analogue scale score was significantly lower than the first (1.3 versus 3.6; P=0.001). The pain treatment required was based on level I in 20.6%, level II in 48.2% and level III in 31% of cases. Pain management in the elderly should be early, adequate and continued in order to preserve to a maximum the quality of life of these patients with PLC.

[Age and management decisions in patients with primary lung cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic decisions are difficult in elderly patients because of the heterogeneity of this population. Our objective was to evaluate the role of age in the management of patients suffering from primary lung cancer seen in the department of respiratory diseases of the Limoges regional teaching hospital between 2002 and 2004.

METHODS

A cross sectional study analysed the management of 363 patients suffering from primary lung cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age (less than seventy or seventy and over). A comparison was made between the management of the two groups.

RESULTS

The comparisons according to age produced evidence of reduced activity, greater dependence, an increased Charlson score, less frequently administered radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and more frequent symptomatic treatment in the elderly group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The geriatric assessment of patients suffering from primary lung cancer should make allowance for the physiological age of the patient and adapt the management to ensure the best quality of life.

First line chemotherapy with planned sequential administration of gemcitabine followed by docetaxel in elderly advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter phase II study

This multicenter phase II study evaluated, in chemonaive patients with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC, age ⩾70 and with a performance status 0–2, the activity, efficacy and tolerability of planned sequential administration of gemcitabine 1200 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for three courses followed by three cycles of docetaxel 37.5 mg m⁻² on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, provided there was no evidence of disease progression. A total of 56 patients entered the study. According to intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 16.0% (95% CI 7.6–28.3%); 23 patients (41.0%) had stable disease and 24 patients (43%) had progressive disease. Five patients who had a stable disease after three courses of gemcitabine obtained a conversion to partial response by docetaxel. Median time to progression was 4.8 months (95% CI 3.6–6.0 months) and median duration of survival was 8.0 months (95% CI 5.6–10.5 months). The 1-year survival rate was 34%. No grade 4 haematological toxicity was observed and grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 5.4 and 3.6% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 mucositis and grade 3 diarrhoea, both occurred in 3.6% of the patients and grade 3 asthenia was observed in 9% of patients. One patient reported a grade 4 skin toxicity. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel is a well-tolerated and effective regimen in elderly advanced NSCLC patients.

An open multicenter phase II trial of docetaxel–gemcitabine in Charlson score and performance status (PS) selected elderly patients with stage IIIB pleura/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): The GFPC 02-02a study

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of patient selection based on age, comorbidity and performance status on the efficacy of platinum-free combination therapy on non-small-cell lung cancer after 65 years of age. We analyzed the overall response rate, the median survival time, the 1-year survival rate, toxicity and quality of life after one to three 6-week cycles of docetaxel 30mg/m(2) weekly and gemcitabine 900mg/m(2) at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 5. Fifty patients (median age 73.7 years) were eligible. The mean number of comorbid conditions per patient was 0.8 [Balducci L. Lung cancer and aging. ASCO 2005. Educational book. p. 587-91; Piquet J, Blanchon F, Grivaux M, et al. Primary bronchial carcinoma in elderly subjects in France. Rev Mal Respir 2003;20:691-9; Jatoi A, Hillman S, Stella P, et al. Should elderly non-small-cell lung cancer patients be offered elderly-specific trials? Results of a pooled analysis from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9113-9; Balducci L, Extermann M. Management of cancer in the older person: a practical approach. Oncologist 2000;5:224-37]. Forty-five patients were assessable: 17 (34%) had an objective response, 18 (36%) had stable disease and 10 progressed (20%). The median survival time was 7 months and the 1-year survival rate 23.5%. The main grade III-IV adverse event was neutropenia (32% of patients).

CONCLUSION

Platinum-free dual-agent chemotherapy gives similar results in patients over 65, selected on the basis of their precise age and comorbidity, to that reported in younger subjects.

An open multicenter phase II trial of weekly docetaxel for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients with significant comorbidity and/or poor performance status: The GFPC 02-02b study

CONTEXT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and activity of weekly docetaxel monotherapy in frail elderly patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, selected on the basis of their precise age, general condition, and number of comorbid disorders (Charlson score).

METHODS

Analysis of the response rate, toxicity, quality of life, median survival and 1-year survival rates after 1-3 six-week cycles of docetaxel 30mg/m(2) weekly.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled and 42 were assessable. Five patients (10%, [3.7-22.6]) had objective responses, 14 (28%, [16.9-41.6]) had stable disease, and 23 (46%, [32.6-52.8]) progressed. The main grade 3-4 toxicity was fatigue (30%). Quality of life remained stable during treatment. The median survival time was 4.3 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 21.8%.

CONCLUSION

In frail elderly patients selected on the basis of their age, general condition and comorbidity, weekly docetaxel monotherapy has acceptable toxicity and does not negatively affect quality of life. In contrast, it has only moderate activity.