Drew AE, Al-Assaad S, Yu V, Andrews P, Merkel P, Szilvassy S, Emkey R, Lewis R, Brake RL. Comparison of 2 cell-based phosphoprotein assays to support screening and development of an ALK inhibitor.
ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011;
16:164-73. [PMID:
21297104 DOI:
10.1177/1087057110394657]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) when expressed as a fusion protein with nucleophosmin (NPM) has been implicated as a driving oncogene in a subset of lymphomas. Recent reports of ALK expression in a number of other cancers have raised the possibility that an ALK inhibitor may benefit patients with these diseases as well. In a campaign to identify and develop a selective ALK inhibitor, 2 assays were devised to measure the phosphorylation of tyrosine residue 1604 of ALK (pY(1604) ALK). Amplified Luminescent Proximity Homogeneous Assay (AlphaScreen(®)) and phosflow platforms were used to detect modulation of pY(1604) ALK to determine the relative potency of a set of small-molecule inhibitors. Prior to making use of these assays in diverse settings, the authors attempted to ensure their equivalence with a direct comparison of their performance. The pY(1604) ALK assays correlated well both with each other and with assays of ALK enzyme activity or ALK-dependent cell proliferation. The AlphaScreen(®) assay was amenable to automation and enabled rapid, high-throughput compound assessment in an NPM-ALK-driven cell line, whereas the phosflow assay enabled the authors to characterize the activity of compounds with respect to their impact on targeted enzymes and pathways. Results show that both AlphaScreen(®) and phosflow ALK assays exhibited diverse characteristics that made them desirable for different applications but were determined to be equally sensitive and robust in the detection of inhibition of pY(1604) ALK.
Collapse