Sculier JP, Leclercq N, Meert AP, Paesmans M, Berghmans T. [Implementation of an oncological care program in a multidisciplinary clinic].
Rev Mal Respir 2015;
33:600-6. [PMID:
26611198 DOI:
10.1016/j.rmr.2015.10.741]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Accepted: 10/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
A working group has highlighted guidelines in thoracic oncology in Europe without study of their implementation, due to a lack of data.
METHODS
The records of 354 untreated lung cancer patients seen between January 2009 and December 2012 were reviewed. Any new treatment should have been proposed by a multidisciplinary consultation (MDC) in accordance with an oncology care program (OCP) based on the European Lung Cancer Working Party guidelines.
RESULTS
For the 354 patients, there were 636 MDC (332, 176, 81 and 47 in 1st, 2nd, 3rd and subsequent lines). For the first line, the MDC rate was 88%, in accordance with the OCP, and 75% of treatments were in agreement with the guidelines. For the 2nd and 3rd lines, the rates were 93% and 92% respectively (MDC), 90 and 89% (OCP), 55 and 63% (guidelines). In the first line, the main causes of non-compliance with the OCP were patient's refusal or doctor's choice and with guidelines a lack of adequate recommendations for specific situations such as comorbidities or the appearance of new treatments.
CONCLUSION
The vast majority of patients are the subject of a MDC with a high rate of application of OCP. Guidelines should be updated regularly to incorporate new treatments.
Collapse