Global burden of disease: huge inequities in the health status in developing and developed countries

Does the universal medical insurance system reduce catastrophic health expenditure among middle-aged and elderly households in China? A longitudinal analysis

BACKGROUND

The Chinese government has made great progress in establishing the universal medical insurance system. This study aimed to analyze whether the universal medical insurance system protected middle-aged and elderly households from catastrophic health expenditure (CHE).

METHODS

The data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. We used household as our unit of analysis and CHE was measured as out-of-pocket expenditures ≥ 40% of nonfood household expenditures. Univariate analysis was deployed to examine the impacts of different medical insurance schemes on CHE, and the factors associated with CHE were estimated using a random-effects logit regression model.

RESULTS

We identified 10,005, 10,370, and 11,567 households in 2011, 2013, and 2015, respectively, and found 12.9% (2011), 26.6% (2013) and 27.9% (2015) of the households experienced CHE. When compared with no insurance, households enrolled in New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance Scheme (P = 0.023) were associated with a lower incidence of CHE, but other insurance schemes were not significant. Households with members older than 65 years (P < 0.001), members with chronic diseases (P < 0.001), members with poor self-reported health conditions (P < 0.001), and members receiving health care (P < 0.001) had a higher risk of CHE. Large household size (P < 0.001) and high household income per capita (P < 0.001) were major protective factors to CHE incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite China's great stride in the medical insurance coverage, it fell short to provide financial protection against medical expenditure burden. To reduce the risk of CHE, an integrated poverty and elderly-oriented medical insurance system could be put in place to address these problems.

Global Health - emergence, hegemonic trends and biomedical reductionism

Background

Global Health has increasingly gained international visibility and prominence. First and foremost, the spread of cross-border infectious disease arouses a great deal of media and public interest, just as it drives research priorities of faculty and academic programmes. At the same time, Global Health has become a major area of philanthropic action. Despite the importance it has acquired over the last two decades, the complex collective term “Global Health” still lacks a uniform use today.

Objectives

The objective of this paper is to present the existing definitions of Global Health, and analyse their meaning and implications. The paper emphasises that the term “Global Health” goes beyond the territorial meaning of “global”, connects local and global, and refers to an explicitly political concept. Global Health regards health as a rights-based, universal good; it takes into account social inequalities, power asymmetries, the uneven distribution of resources and governance challenges. Thus, it represents the necessary continuance of Public Health in the face of diverse and ubiquitous global challenges. A growing number of international players, however, focus on public-private partnerships and privatisation and tend to promote biomedical reductionism through predominantly technological solutions. Moreover, the predominant Global Health concept reflects the inherited hegemony of the Global North. It takes insufficient account of the global burden of disease, which is mainly characterised by non-communicable conditions, and the underlying social determinants of health.

Conclusions

Beyond resilience and epidemiological preparedness for preventing cross-border disease threats, Global Health must focus on the social, economic and political determinants of health. Biomedical and technocratic reductionism might be justified in times of acute health crises but entails the risk of selective access to health care. Consistent health-in-all policies are required for ensuring Health for All and sustainably reducing health inequalities within and among countries. Global Health must first and foremost pursue the enforcement of the universal right to health and contribute to overcoming global hegemony.