Temperature trends in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

Postoperative fever: differences between elective vs. traumatic hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether there is a difference in the incidence of postoperative fever (POF) between hip, knee and shoulder arthroplasty. The influence of a trauma setting has not been investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 675 joint replacement surgeries (hip, knee, shoulder arthroplasty) in an elective or trauma setting over a 2 year period (2016-2018). Patient demographics and perioperative/postoperative parameters were investigated. The fever curve was characterized. The results and costs of any fever-related diagnostic workup were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients (13.2%) experienced a POF ≥ 38.0 °C, only 21 patients (3.1%) a POF ≥ 38.5 °C (of the latter: 4.6% of hip arthroplasties, 0.6% of knee arthroplasties, 0% of shoulder arthroplasties). There was a significantly greater risk (OR 3.88) for POF ≥ 38.5 °C in trauma total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to elective THA (10.6 vs. 3.0%; p < 0.01). Differences in POF rate between the various joint areas were statistically insignificant when comparing only elective and trauma cases with each other, even though there was a trend for higher rates in hip surgery. Patients experiencing POF ≥ 38.5 °C were more often males (p < 0.01) and had an increased intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.03) and longer hospital stay (p < 0.01). There was only 1/89 POF patients developing an early periprosthetic joint infection. The cost of a positive fever workup (3/27 patients, 11.1%) leading to a new diagnosis and treatment was 2045 US$.

CONCLUSION

POF ≥ 38.5 °C was more frequent in traumatic THA compared to elective THA. A trend of difference between POF rates between the different joint areas was statistically insignificant after separating elective and traumatic cases. The risk of developing an early periprosthetic joint infection was not increased in POF. A fever-related diagnostic workup was rarely helpful in the absence of clinical symptoms.

Persistent Wound Drainage After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Persistent wound drainage after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is an important complication with potential substantial adverse consequences, in particular periprosthetic joint infection.

METHODS

This review evaluated the available literature regarding several issues in the field of persistent wound drainage after TJA and offers a classification of persistent wound drainage and an algorithmic approach to the decision-making process.

RESULTS

Available literature addressing the diagnosis and treatment of persistent wound drainage after TJA is scarce and an evidence-based clinical guideline is lacking. This is partially caused by the absence of a universally accepted definition of persistent wound drainage. In patients with persistent wound drainage, clinical signs and serological tests can be helpful in the diagnosis of a developing infection. Regarding the treatment of persistent wound drainage, nonsurgical treatment consists of absorbent dressings, pressure bandages, and temporary joint immobilization. Surgical treatment is advised when wound drainage persists for more than 5-7 days and consists of open debridement with irrigation and exchange of modular components and antimicrobial treatment.

CONCLUSION

Based on this literature review, we proposed a classification and algorithmic approach for the management of patients with persistent wound drainage after TJA. Hopefully, this offers the orthopedic surgeon a practical clinical guideline by finding the right balance between overtreatment and undertreatment, weighing the risks and benefits. However, this classification and algorithmic approach should first be evaluated in a prospective trial.

Post-operative fever in orthopaedic surgery: How effective is the 'fever workup?'

BACKGROUND

Defining the appropriate threshold at which to initiate a fever workup is imperative to promote patient safety, appropriate resource utilization, and antibiotic stewardship. Our group performed a systematic review of the available literature on perioperative fever (POF) workups in orthopaedic patients to evaluate the frequency, timing and utility of blood cultures (BC) and other investigations in the POF workup, to determine the clinical relevance of any infections and to evaluate their cost effectiveness.

METHODS

Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, Cochrane and Google Scholar for articles through September 2016. Forty-nine articles were retrieved and 22 articles met the pre-determined inclusion criteria. Proportions of positive studies were noted and averaged using random effects analysis.

RESULTS

Post-operative pyrexia ranged in prevalence between 8.1% and 87.3%. The studies routinely performed during a fever workup had wide ranges of diagnostic yield, including chest X-rays from 0% to 40%, urinalyses from 8.2% to 38.7%, urine cultures from 0% to 22.4% and BC from 0% to 13.3%. Only two patients with positive BC developed clinical sepsis. Cost per fever evaluation ranged from $350 to $950.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review suggest that early post-operative fever is an expected event following orthopaedic surgery. Based on the available literature, any kind of workup in the absence of localizing symptoms in the third post-operative day or before is unwarranted and is an inappropriate use of hospital resources.

Postoperative fever after hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients over 70 years of age with displaced femoral neck fracture: Necessity of routine workup?

OBJECTIVES

Displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients has been treated with hemiarthroplasty as the treatment of choice. Fever following HA is common in these elderly patients. The aim of this study was to determine which post-HA fever workup could be beneficial in this group of patients.

METHODS

A total of 272 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years undergoing HA for displaced femoral neck fracture were retrospectively investigated. Postoperative fever (POF) was defined as any recorded body temperature ≥38°C in the early postoperative period. POF in each patient was characterized by the maximum temperature, the day of the first fever, and frequency of fever, stratified as either single or multiple fever spikes. Medical records were reviewed to identify positive fever workups and febrile complications.

RESULTS

Of 272 patients, 135 (49.6%) developed POF. A total of 428 routine diagnostic tests were performed in all patients with POF, of which only 57 tests (13.3%) were positive. Urinalysis showed the highest positive rate (21.9%), followed by urine culture (14.3%), chest x-ray (12.6%), and blood culture (1.1%). The most common febrile complication was pneumonia (12.6%), followed by urinary tract infection (8.1%). On multivariate logistic regression for positive workups, only fever after postoperative day (POD) 2 was a risk factor for positive chest x-ray (OR 3.86, p=0.016) and urine culture (OR 5.04, p=0.019). Moreover, fever after POD 2 (OR 6.93, p<0.0001) and multiple fever spikes (OR 2.92, p=0.026) were independent predictors of infectious febrile complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine workup for POF following hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fracture is not warranted. However, for fever after POD 2 and multiple fever spikes, chest x-ray and urinalysis would be necessary to rule out the two most common febrile complications such as pneumonia and urinary tract infection.

Routine Workup of Postoperative Pyrexia Following Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Only Necessary in Select Circumstances

BACKGROUND

It is unclear when routine workup of postoperative pyrexia (POP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) should be performed.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic database search was conducted on 25,558 consecutive patients undergoing primary or revision TJA between June 2001 and June 2013. We identified patient demographics, procedure type, characteristics of feverish patients, and febrile complications. The estimated costs for chest x-ray (CXR), urinalysis, urine culture, and blood culture were investigated.

RESULTS

POP occurred in 46% of TJAs. A total of 11,589 separate workups were performed in 90.5% of POP patients, of which 2.4% were positive. Urinalysis, urine culture, blood culture, and CXR were positive in 38.7%, 9.5%, 7.0%, and 0.2%, respectively. Febrile complications occurred in 4.5% and the infectious complications rate was 2.0%. The positive rate of fever workups was significantly higher in patients with the first POP occurring after postoperative day 3, POP > 102°F, multiple fever spikes, and patients undergoing revision TJA. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the time of first POP, the maximum temperature, multiple fever spikes, and revision TJA were independent predictors of febrile complications. The estimated cost for 11,319 negative workups in patients with POP was $4,636,976.80, with CXR costing $4,613,182.00.

CONCLUSION

Selective workup of POP following TJA should be performed in patients with higher temperatures, fever occurring after postoperative day 3, those with multiple fever spikes, and those undergoing revision TJA. CXR with an extremely low positive rate should not routinely be ordered.

Characteristics and significance of fever during 4 weeks after primary total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Most previous studies on postoperative fever (POF; ≥38 °C) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have reported findings from only the immediate postoperative days (PODs). The hypothesis of the current study is that 4 weeks of follow-up may reveal differences in the characteristics of POF and fever-related factors between a normal inflammatory response and an early acute infection-related response.

METHODS

A total of 400 consecutive TKAs (314 patients) were retrospectively investigated. Patients were stratified into those who developed an early acute periprosthetic infection that required subsequent surgical treatment (STG; n = 5 TKAs) and those who did not (non-STG; n = 395 TKAs).

RESULTS

Among the 400 knees, 149 (37 %) developed POF, with most reaching a maximum temperature (MT) on POD 0. In 13 TKA patients who had POF with a peak daily temperature ≥38 °C during postoperative weeks 2-4, the causes of POF were respiratory and urinary tract infections (n = 5 for each), superficial infection (n = 2), and periprosthetic infection (n = 1). The STG and non-STG differed significantly with regard to the rate of POF (p = 0.0205) and MT (p = 0.0003), including MTs less than 38 °C, during postoperative weeks 2-4. All five STG patients had elevated C-reactive protein levels and local symptomatic findings before the additional surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of POF and MT along with elevated C-reactive protein and local symptomatic findings at 2-4 weeks postoperatively may indicate the need for a positive fever workup to recognize early acute periprosthetic infection.

Blood cultures for assessment of postoperative fever in arthroplasty patients

Postoperative fever in arthroplasty patients is common. The value of diagnostic workup of fever in this instance is of questionable utility. Studies have shown that blood cultures in this scenario add little to clinical management, but sample sizes have been small and the use of blood cultures in this setting continues. This study aimed to examine the value of blood cultures in the assessment of postoperative fever in a large arthroplasty population. The medical records of 101 patients who had 141 blood culture sets taken during a 2-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 141 blood culture sets, only 2 returned positive results. These were both thought to be as a result of skin contamination at the time of venipuncture. No infectious sequelae occurred in either patient. We conclude that blood cultures have no role to play in the assessment of the febrile, otherwise asymptomatic arthroplasty patient in the early postoperative period.

The role of blood cultures in the acute evaluation of postoperative fever in arthroplasty patients

The use of blood cultures to work up fever in postarthroplasty patients was studied retrospectively. Four hundred fifty-three patients done consecutively with a diagnosis-related group 209 discharge diagnosis were studied. One hundred patients (22%) had blood cultures drawn for fever greater than 101 degrees F. Specifically, there were 240 total knee arthroplasty patients with 40 blood cultures drawn. There were 124 total hip arthroplasty patients with 31 blood cultures drawn. One patient with a total knee arthroplasty had positive cultures as did one patient with a total hip arthroplasty. Both were thought to be contaminants, and neither had any sequelae. Blood cultures are expensive and do not add relevant information in the care of postarthroplasty patients.