Postoperative blood salvage in total knee arthroplasty using the Solcotrans autotransfusion system

Postoperative Autologous Reinfusion in Total Knee Replacement

Surgeries for total knee replacement (TKR) are increasing and in this context there is a need to develop new protocols for management and use of blood transfusion therapy. Autologous blood reduces the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and the aim of the present study was to verify the safety and the clinical efficacy. An observational retrospective study has been conducted on 124 patients, undergoing cemented total knee prosthesis replacement. Observed population was stratified into two groups: the first group received reinfusion of autologous blood collected in the postoperative surgery and the second group did not receive autologous blood reinfusion. Analysis of data shows that patients undergoing autologous blood reinfusion received less homologous blood bags (10.6% versus 30%; p = 0.08) and reduced days of hospitalization (7.88 ± 0.7 days versus 8.96 ± 2.47 days for the control group; p = 0.03). Microbiological tests were negative in all postoperatively salvaged and reinfused units. Our results emphasize the effectiveness of this procedure and have the characteristics of simplicity, low cost (€97.53 versus €103.79; p < 0.01), and easy reproducibility. Use of autologous drainage system postoperatively is a procedure that allows reducing transfusion of homologous blood bags in patients undergoing TKR.

The Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Transfusion in Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Purpose

Although allogeneic blood transfusion is the most common method of transfusion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there are reports showing significant decrease in the amount of allogeneic transfusion and incidence of side effects after combined use of autologous transfusion. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of using an autologous transfusion device in TKA.

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent TKA at our institution from January 2003 to January 2014 were divided into two groups: group A (n=127) who received allogeneic transfusion only in TKA and group B (n=118) who received autologous transfusion via an autologous transfusion device and allogeneic transfusion. In both groups, the patients were transfused when the hemoglobin level was below 9 g/dL. In group B, blood collected by the autologous transfusion device was transfused only once after surgery. The total blood loss volume, total transfusion volume, and the presence of side effects were assessed based on medical records.

Results

Group A received 294.6 mL more allogeneic transfusion than group B (p<0.001). There were no significant differences with regard to the development of side effects between groups.

Conclusions

Application of an autologous transfusion device during TKA can be effective in reducing the allogeneic transfusion volume. Moreover, allogeneic transfusion was not necessary after autologous transfusion in some patients.

Prospective comparative study of two different autotransfusion methods versus control group in total knee replacement

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two different autotransfusion methods in total knee replacement (TKR) performed without tourniquet, in comparison to allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) only.

METHOD

In a comparative study, 248 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized in three groups: in control Group 85 the patients underwent only ABT post-operatively, in Group 1 (n:92) an intraoperative and postoperative autotransfusion were utilized, and in Group 2 (n:71) only a postoperative autotransfusion was applied. Post-operative ABT was utilized according to predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Comparing Group 0 to Group 1 and 2 the difference in need for ABT post-operatively was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) even when the results were analyzed classifying the patients according to the preoperative Hb levels. The difference between Group 1 and 2 was not significant.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, auto-transfusion reduces the need for ABT in TKR performed without tourniquet.

A prospective randomised controlled trial of autologous retransfusion in total knee replacement

We undertook a prospective randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of autologous retransfusion drains in reducing the need for allogenic blood requirement after unilateral total knee replacement. We also monitored the incidence of post-operative complications. There were 86 patients in the control group, receiving standard care with a vacuum drain, and 92 who received an autologous drain and were retransfused postoperatively. Following serial haemoglobin measurements at 24, 48 and 72 hours, we found no difference in the need for allogenic blood between the two groups (control group 15.1%, retransfusion group 13% (p = 0.439)). The incidence of post-operative complications, such as wound infection, deep-vein thrombosis and chest infection, was also comparable between the groups. There were no adverse reactions associated with the retransfusion of autologous blood. Based on this study, the cost-effectiveness and continued use of autologous drains in total knee replacement should be questioned.

The effectiveness of reinfusion after total knee replacement. A prospective randomised controlled study

The purpose of our study was to determine the effectiveness of a postoperative autologous blood reinfusion system as an alternative to homologous, banked blood transfusions in total knee arthroplasty. We carried out a prospective randomised controlled study on 60 patients having unilateral total knee replacements. In all these patients, the same surgical team applied the same surgical technique, and all patients followed the same rehabilitation program. In 30 of these patients (group A), a reinfusion system of unwashed salvaged blood was applied, and they were supplemented postoperatively with banked blood transfusions when required. A control group of 30 patients (group B), in whom standard suction drains were used, received one unit of homologous banked blood transfusion intraoperatively and additional blood transfusions postoperatively when required. The administration of banked blood transfusion was determined by the haemoglobin value (<9 mg/dl) and/or clinical signs (blood pressure, pulse, etc.). The values of haemoglobin, haematocrit and platelets were recorded preoperatively and the first, fifth and 15th postoperative days, respectively. Five patients of group A required nine units of homologous blood (0.3 units/patient) postoperatively. Ten patients of group B required an additional 15 banked blood units postoperatively (in total 45 banked blood units for group B; 1.5 units/patient). In the study group, the total homologous blood requirements were reduced by 80%, while the postoperative blood requirements were reduced by 50%. There was no significant difference in the postoperative haematocrit and haemoglobin values between the two groups. The cost of the blood management in the study group was reduced by 36%. The use of an autologous blood reinfusion system reduces highly effectively the demands of homologous banked blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty.

Autotransfusion drains in total knee replacement. Are they alternatives to homologous transfusion?

We prospectively randomised 104 consecutive patients undergoing primary cemented total knee arthroplasty into two groups of 52 patients each, with one group to receive a standard suction drain (Redivac) and the other, an autologous transfusion drain (Bellovac). Randomisation was achieved using the software programme MINIM: , which was set to randomly allocate patients to either of the two groups based on their age, sex and body mass index (BMI). All procedures were performed under pneumatic tourniquet. Drains were released in the recovery room 20 min after surgery and removed 24 h following surgery. Blood collected in the standard suction drain (control group) was discarded, while blood collected in the autologous transfusion drains (study group) was transfused unwashed back to the patient within 6 h of collection. Thirteen patients (25%) in the study group had two or more units of homologous blood transfused in addition to the blood collected postoperatively and re-transfused (average: 438 ml). Twelve patients (23%) in the control group had two or more units of homologous blood transfused. No sepsis, transfusion reactions or coagulopathies were associated with the autologous blood transfused in the study group. The use of the autologous transfusion system (Bellovac) proved to be safe but failed to reduce the need for postoperative homologous blood transfusion following uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty.

Transfusion of autologous blood from reinfusion systems in total knee arthroplasty

After total knee arthroplasty (TKA) the technique of wound management is not standardised. In this prospective study the efficacy of autologous blood reinfusion from the wound was investigated. One hundred patients (100 TKAs) were enrolled in this sequential cohort study. In one-half of the operations, a reinfusion system with suction and in the other half one wound drain without suction were used. Blood loss, transfusion requirements, range of motion, Insall scores and the incidence of complications were studied. The use of a reinfusion system did not decrease the homologous transfusion requirements. The blood loss in the group with a suction drainage system was significantly higher. Our experiences since May 2002 with one drain without suction in 787 consecutive TKAs confirm all findings of the current study.

Reduction of blood transfusion rates in unilateral total knee arthroplasty by the introduction of a simple blood transfusion protocol

We prospectively studied blood transfusion practices within a single institution before and after the introduction of a blood transfusion protocol in consecutive patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Data were collected on 393 patients (group I) prior to and 295 patients (group II) after the introduction of the protocol. Following the introduction of the protocol, patients with preoperative haemoglobin of less than 11 g/dl were cross-matched prior to surgery. The criterion for postoperative transfusion was postoperative haemoglobin of less than 8.5 g/dl or a symptomatic patient with haemoglobin of greater than 8.5 g/dl. This change in practice reduced the transfusion rates from 31% in group I to 11.9% in group II. It reduced the non-utilisation of blood from 64 to 1%. There were no adverse outcomes related to the introduction of the protocol.

Comparison of perioperative blood salvage and postoperative reinfusion of drained blood during surgical correction of craniosynostosis in infants

BACKGROUND

The surgical correction of craniosynostosis may be associated with extensive blood loss and transfusion. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the perioperative use of the continuous autotransfusion system (CATS group) and of the postoperative use of the CBCII ConstaVac(R) system (CV group) to reduce homologous transfusion in infants during repair of craniosynostosis.

METHODS

Two groups of consecutive infants, weighing <10 kg, and scheduled for the surgical correction of craniosynostosis, were compared retrospectively according to the blood salvaging system used: CATS group and CV group. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the total volume of homologous blood transfused.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the CV (n = 69) and the CATS (n = 135) groups with regard to physical, preoperative and postoperative data, except for the type of craniosysnostosis with more scaphocephaly in the CV group (P = 0.03). No significant difference in blood loss and homologous transfusion was observed between the two groups during the perioperative period. Two subgroups of patients were also compared: a subgroup including patients operated on with a linear craniectomy for scaphocephaly, and a subgroup including all other patients. There was also no significant difference in blood loss and homologous transfusion between the CV and the CATS groups for these two subgroups of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the postoperative use of the CBCII ConstaVac(R) system is as efficient as the perioperative use of the CATS(R) system for reducing homologous blood transfusion during repair of craniosynostosis in infants weighing <10 kg.

Transfusion options in total joint arthroplasty

Concern about the safety of allogeneic blood transfusion, including the risk of viral infection and immunosuppression, has led to the development of transfusion options in total joint arthroplasty, including intraoperative and postoperative blood salvage, autologous donation, hemodilution, and the use of epoetin alfa. Intraoperative or postoperative blood salvage has been shown not to be cost-effective at our institution except in revision hip arthroplasties because not enough blood is collected. Autologous donation is not helpful. One third of patients undergoing joint arthroplasty have hemoglobin values between 10 and 13 g/dL preoperatively. The most efficient way to decrease allogeneic risk in these patients is epoetin alfa. Epoetin alfa decreases allogeneic risk to 12.9%, which is acceptable. Patients with preoperative hemoglobin >14 g/dL undergoing single total knee or total hip arthroplasty do not need anything because their allogeneic risk is minimal.

The use of the orthopaedic perioperative autotransfusion (OrthoPAT) system in total joint replacement surgery

Management of blood loss in orthopaedic surgery has evolved over the years. New approaches to making blood safer for patients has involved the use of preoperative autologous donation, the use of epoetin alfa administered preoperatively, intraoperative salvage, and perioperative salvage and infusion devices. A new alternative to salvage and infusion devices is the OrthoPAT. This article is meant to introduce the device to the orthopaedic nurse who works in the OR, PACU, and orthopaedic or medical-surgical unit, and who cares for orthopaedic patients who experience significant blood loss in total joint replacement surgery.

The cost-effectiveness of postoperative recovery of RBCs in preventing transfusion-associated virus transmission after joint arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The return of joint drainage after hip and knee arthroplasty is a widely used but expensive blood-conservation technique.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A Markov decision analysis model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of postoperative RBC recovery in preventing viral complications of allogeneic transfusion.

RESULTS

In the baseline analysis, using an RBC-recovery device saves 5 quality-adjusted minutes of longevity at an average incremental cost of $53. This corresponds to $5.7 million per quality-adjusted life year. This figure was most sensitive to the direct cost differences of allogeneic versus recovered RBCs and to the volume of RBCs recovered per device. Such devices would save health care resources if they cost less than $73 or if they were applied only in cases where joint drainage was between 600 and 1100 mL.

CONCLUSION

For most clinical situations, postarthroplasty RBC recovery does not appear to be as cost-effective as most other medical interventions. Clinical attention should be directed toward developing protocols for the preferential use of postoperative RBC-recovery devices in situations where they provide the greatest benefit.

Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: a randomized study of 90 patients

We studied the management of postoperative drainage after total knee replacement (TKR). 90 primary total knee joint arthroplasties were prospectively randomized into 3 groups: a) no drain, b) an autotransfusion system, c) a standard disposable closed suction drainage system. We monitored hemoglobin and hematocrit values, drainage volume and transfusions (homologous and autologous), range of knee motion, knee swelling and hospital stay. Parameters were recorded preoperatively, days 0-8 and 4 months postoperatively. No significant differences were seen between the groups in any of the parameters measured. The results show no benefit from using postoperative drainage systems in knee arthroplasties. Savings of SEK 400 (USD 55) per patient would have resulted if drains had not been used at all.

Hematuria associated with low-volume cell saver in pediatric orthopaedics

A low-volume autotransfusion device, Haemocell System 350, was used for four consecutive pediatric orthopaedic patients. Although the initial patient evidenced no hematuria, transient hematuria was noted in three consecutive patients. Follow-up blood urea nitrogen, electrolytes, and creatinine levels were all within normal limits. After discontinuation of the device, no further hematuria has occurred in subsequent patients. Although intraoperative low-volume cell savers may have a role in pediatric orthopaedic surgery associated with low total blood volume loss, we observed three cases of postoperative hematuria by using this device in cases with large total blood volume loss [>28% estimated blood volume (EBV)]. Although all of these cases were transitory, we recommend caution in the use of low-volume intraoperative blood-salvage devices in pediatrics at this time.

Blood transfusion strategies for total knee arthroplasty: minimizing autologous blood wastage, risk of homologous blood transfusion, and transfusion cost

In this nonrandomized study, alternative strategies were suggested to 10 orthopaedic surgeons to minimize autologous blood wastage, the risk of homologous blood transfusion, and cost associated with blood product usage after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One hundred fifty-five patients with 177 consecutive TKAs over a 2-year period were studied. Group 1 patients had undergone unilateral TKA and did not predonate; 1A patients (n = 19) were drained with a Hemovac, and 1B patients (n = 28) with a postoperative blood recovery system. Group 2 patients (n = 47) predonated one packed red blood cell (pRBC) unit. Group 3 patients (n = 20) predonated 2 pRBC units. Group 4 patients had undergone bilateral sequential TKAs (n = 21) and had predonated 2 pRBC units. Group 5 patients (n = 14) had undergone revision TKA procedures and their blood requirements were individualized. Group 6 patients (n = 6) had preexisting anemia and were excluded from the study. There was no significant difference in total blood loss (909 mL) between groups. Female sex was associated with significantly lower admission hematocrit. Homologous blood was required for 4% of patients in the entire study and the percentage was not statistically different between groups. Twenty-five percent of patients who predonated autologous pRBCs did not use all or some of it. In group 1, the postoperative blood recovery system had a significant effect on reducing postoperative hematocrit drop (P = .0001), but it was not a significant factor if autologous pRBCs were available. The costs associated with group 1A were significantly less (P = .0001) compared with the other groups; group 1A had the highest admission hematocrit (43.2). Transfusion with autologous pRBCs was related to lower admission hematocrit rather than to increased postoperative blood loss. An algorithm is presented to provide cost-effective management of blood products after TKA.