Aspiration as a guide to sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty

A "Dry Tap" in Prosthetic Joint Infection Workup of Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Reassuring

BACKGROUND

Synovial fluid analysis is important in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The rate of culture-positive PJI in patients who have a dry tap of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well described.

METHODS

We reviewed all image-guided THA aspirations, performed from 2014 to 2021 at a single academic institution. Aspirations were categorized as successful (≥ 0.5 mL) or unsuccessful (< 0.5 mL, "dry tap"). We analyzed culture data on all repeat aspirations and revision surgeries performed within 90 days of the initial dry tap.

RESULTS

We reviewed 275 consecutive attempted THA aspirations of which 100 (36.4%) resulted in a dry tap. The dry tap cohort had a significantly higher percentage of fluoroscopic-guided aspirations (64%) and fewer ultrasound-guided aspirations (36%) compared to the successful aspiration cohort (48.9% fluoroscopic, 53.1% ultrasound, P = .0061). Of the 100 patients who have dry taps, 48 underwent revision surgery within 90 days of the initial dry tap, and 15 resulted in 2 or more positive cultures. The rate of PJI defined by MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria in the dry tap cohort was 16.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Attempted aspiration of a THA resulted in a dry tap 36.4% of the time. Of those patients who had a dry tap, 16.0% were subsequently found to have PJI based on MusculoSkeletal Infection Society major criteria. Therefore, a "dry tap" does not exclude the diagnosis of infection and should not be considered reassuring for the absence of PJI.

Is ultrasound-guided hip aspiration more successful than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection?

Introduction: aspiration of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly performed to assist in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aimed to determine whether fluoroscopic- or ultrasound- guided hip aspiration differs in the ability to acquire synovial fluid and in the accuracy of diagnosing infection. Methods: all THA aspirations performed between 2014 and 2021 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Aspirations were classified as successful or dry. If successful, the volume of fluid obtained was recorded. The sensitivity and specificity of hip aspiration in identifying PJI were calculated with four methods: (1) culture results excluding saline lavage, (2) culture results including saline lavage, (3) 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria, and (4) 2021 European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Analyses were performed using Student's t test or Wilcoxon rank sum for continuous variables and chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: 290 aspirations were included (155 fluoroscopic-guided and 135 ultrasound-guided). Success of aspiration (> 0.5  mL) was more common in the ultrasound cohort (69 %) than fluoroscopy (53 %) (p < 0.0055 ). When successful, more volume was obtained in the ultrasound cohort (mean 13.1 mL vs. 10.0 mL; p = 0.0002 ). Ultrasound-guided aspiration was more sensitive than fluoroscopy in diagnosing PJI using culture results excluding saline lavage (85 % vs. 73 %; p = 0.03 ), culture results including saline lavage (85 % vs. 69 %; p = 0.001 ), 2018 MSIS-ICM criteria (77 % vs. 52 %; p = 0.02 ), and 2021 EBJIS criteria (87 % vs. 65 %; p = 0.02 ). Ultrasound-guided aspiration was more specific than fluoroscopy in diagnosing PJI using 2021 EBJIS criteria (100 % vs. 96 %; p = 0.001 ). Conclusions: ultrasound-guided aspiration is more frequently successful and yields more fluid than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration of THA. Ultrasound-guided aspiration is more sensitive in diagnosing PJI than fluoroscopy using culture data, 2018 MSIS-ICM criteria, and 2021 EBJIS criteria.

Genomic Sequencing to Diagnose Prosthetic Joint Infection in the Knee: A Case Report

There is currently no "gold-standard" method to diagnose prosthetic joint infections (PJI), and the current practice of using microbiological cultures has many limitations. The identification of the bacterial species causing the infection is crucial to guide treatment; therefore, a robust method needs to be developed. Here, we attempt to use genomic sequencing with the MinION device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies to identify the species of bacteria causing PJI in a 61-year-old male. Genomic sequencing with the MinION presents an opportunity to produce species identification in real-time and at a smaller cost than current methods. By comparing results with standard hospital microbiological cultures, this study suggests that nanopore sequencing using the MinION could be a faster and more sensitive method to diagnose PJI than microbiological cultures.

Utility of lavage in addition to native fluid collection during fluoroscopically guided joint aspiration in infection diagnosis

Image-guided prosthetic joint aspirations have been criticized in the literature as having poor sensitivity and specificity. Native fluid is typically analyzed for the presence of infection. Joint lavage during fluoroscopically guided aspiration of prosthetic joints is not routinely performed, and the lavage aspirate is not typically analyzed unless native fluid could not be aspirated for culture. This study aims to determine if concordance of culture results from native fluid and an additional joint lavage sample improves sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection by fluoroscopically guided joint aspiration. A retrospective review of the fluoroscopically guided joint aspirations at our institution between December 2007 and December 2009 was performed. Data collected from the electronic medical record included culture results for both native fluid and lavage aspirate, histopathology results, final clinical diagnosis, as well as clinical/surgical management. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratio for infection were calculated for the following culture analysis scenarios: native fluid alone; lavage aspirate alone; native fluid; and lavage aspirate. Five hundred sixty-three aspirations, mostly prosthetic joints, were identified in the reviewed time period, of which 397 were sent for both native fluid and lavage aspirate analysis. Concordance between positive culture results from native fluid and joint lavage aspirate markedly increased the likelihood ratio for infection from 23.8 to 138.7 and improved specificity and PPV of fluoroscopically guided joint aspiration, with similar sensitivity and NPV to that of native fluid culture alone.

Diagnostic value of routine pre-operative investigations used in combination in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

The primary aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of joint aspiration culture, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), individually, and in combination for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A consecutive patient series with pre-operative inflammatory marker levels, an aspiration culture of either hip or knee arthroplasty and intra-operative culture samples from subsequent revision surgery was compiled. This retrospective patient cohort analysis included 128 aspiration. The data were analysed to compare pre-operative aspiration cultures, serum ESR and CRP levels to the chosen gold standard for PJI diagnosis of intra-operative culture samples. A diagnostic algorithm was created using the above tests combined with clinical suspicion index. The values that had the highest sensitivity and specificity of predicting PJI were >5 for CRP and >16 for ESR. CRP used individually had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of any test (75.0% and 75.9%, respectively). ESR + aspirate had the highest specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), of 100% for both. Using all three tests together the specificity and PPV were higher than the test individual values (95.3% and 85.0% respectively). Based on subgroup analyses the combination of ESR or CRP plus joint aspiration has superior PPV compared to individual tests. ESR and CRP had the highest NPV when used in isolation. An algorithm has been developed to guide clinical diagnosis.

Ultrasound-Guided Periprosthetic Biopsy in Failed Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Novel Approach to Test Infection in Patients With Dry Joints

BACKGROUND

To diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) preoperatively, ultrasound-guided joint aspiration (US-JA) may not be performed when effusion is minimal or absent. We aimed to report and investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided periprosthetic biopsy (US-PB) of synovial tissue to obtain joint samples in patients without fluid around the implants.

METHODS

One-hundred nine patients (55 men; mean age: 68 ± 13 years) with failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) who underwent revision surgery performed preoperative US-JA or US-PB to rule out PJI.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine of 109 patients had joint effusion and underwent US-JA, while the remaining 40 with dry joint required US-PB. Thirty-five of 109 patients (32.1%) had PJI, while 74/109 (67.9%) had aseptic THA failure. No immediate complications were observed in both groups. Technical success of US-PB was 100%, as the procedure was carried on as planned in all cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of US-JA were 52.2%, 97.8%, 92.3%, 80.3%, and 82.6%, while for US-PB, they were 41.7%, 100%, 100%, 80%, and 82.5%, respectively, with no significant difference (P = .779). Using the final diagnosis as reference standard, we observed a moderate agreement with both US-JA (k = 0.56) and US-PB (k = 0.50).

CONCLUSION

We present a novel US-guided technique to biopsy periprosthetic synovial tissue of failed THA to rule out PJI. We found similar diagnostic performance as compared with traditional US-JA. This supports future larger studies on this procedure that might be applied in patients without joint effusion.

Anatomic Landmark-Guided Hip Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Hip aspirations used to detect a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are usually performed under fluoroscopy or ultrasound. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of simply using anatomic landmarks for aspiration and detecting PJI without the use of any complicated technologies. The authors retrospectively reviewed a total of 186 consecutive hip aspirations performed between April 2015 and December 2018. All patients were suspected to have infections after total hip arthroplasty. The procedures were performed with the patients in the supine position. The authors aimed to aspirate at the neck of the prosthesis. They located the y-axis of the puncture point approximately 2 to 3 cm lateral to the pulse of the femoral artery in the region of the inguinal ligament. The x-axis was estimated by using the pubic symphysis or greater trochanter according to an anteroposterior radiograph of the hip joint. The aspiration failure rate, incidence of complications, and culture results were recorded. The overall aspiration failure rate was 3.8% (7 of 186). No obvious complications related to aspiration were observed. The saline lavage and reaspiration rate was 45.3% (81 of 179) due to "dry taps." The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the remaining 169 patients with definite diagnoses were 0.781 (95% CI, 0.678-0.860), 0.939 (95% CI, 0.857-0.977), 0.931 (95% CI, 0.841-0.975), and 0.802 (95% CI, 0.706-0.874), respectively. Anatomic landmark-guided hip aspiration was a convenient method that could provide satisfactory detection of PJI. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):e85-e90.].

Measurement of Serum Anti-staphylococcal Antibodies Increases Positive Predictive Value of Preoperative Aspiration for Hip Prosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Preoperative synovial fluid culture is pivotal in the early diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) but may yield false-positive and false-negative results. We evaluated the predictive value of synovial fluid culture results combined with the measurement of serum anti-staphylococcal antibodies (SASA).

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) For hip and knee PJI, does combining positive SASA results with preoperative synovial culture results improve the positive predictive value (PPV) of preoperative synovial fluid culture alone? (2) Does combining preoperative synovial fluid culture results with a positive cell count and differential result increase the PPV of preoperative synovial fluid culture alone? (3) What proportion of isolated organisms exhibit concordance in antibiotic susceptibility: preoperative aspiration versus intraoperative isolates?

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted at two French reference centers that manage bone and joint infections and included 481 adult patients who had a revision or resection arthroplasty between June 25, 2012 and June 23, 2014. Exclusion criteria including no serum sample available for immunoassay, the lack of microbiological documentation, and the absence of preoperative aspiration reduced the patient number to 353. Seven patients with an undetermined SASA result were excluded from the analysis. We also excluded patients with PJI involving more than one Staphylococcus species (polystaphylococcal infection) and those in whom more than one Staphylococcus species was recovered from the preoperative synovial fluid culture (polystaphylococcal synovial fluid culture). In total, 340 patients were included in the analysis (no infection, 67% [226 of 340]; staphylococcal infection, 21% [71 of 340]; other infection, 13% [43 of 340]). The preoperative synovial fluid analysis included a cell count and differential and bacterial culture. SASAs were measured using a multiplex immunoassay. The diagnosis of PJI was determined using the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria [] and intraoperative tissue culture at the time of revision surgery was used as the gold standard (at least one positive intraoperative sample for a "virulent" organism (such as S. aureus) or two positive samples for a "non-virulent" (for example S. epidermidis).

RESULTS

SASA increased the PPV compared with synovial fluid culture alone (92% [95% CI 82 to 97] versus 79% [95% CI 68 to 87]; p = 0.04); when stratified by site, an increase in PPV was seen in hip infections (100% [95% CI 89 to 100] versus 77% [95% CI 63 to 88]; p = 0.01) but not in knee infections (84% [95% CI 66 to 95] versus 80% [95% CI 64 to 91]; p = 0.75). A positive cell count and differential result increased the PPV of staphylococcal synovial fluid cultures compared with synovial fluid culture alone (86% [95% CI 70 to 95] versus 79% [95% CI 68 to 87]; p = 0.36); when stratified by site, no difference in hip and knee infections was observed (86% [95% CI 67 to 96] versus 77% [95% CI 63 to 88]; p = 0.42) and 86% [95% CI 70 to 95] versus 80% [95% CI 64 to 91]; p = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

SASA measurement improves the predictive value of synovial fluid cultures of the hip for all staphylococcal organisms, including coagulase-negative staphylococci, but the PPV of SASA plus synovial fluid culture it is not superior to the PPV of synovial fluid cell count/differential plus synovial culture for the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Synovial Fluid Aspirates Diluted with Saline or Blood Reduce the Sensitivity of Traditional and Contemporary Synovial Fluid Biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Recent criteria-based diagnostic tools to diagnose periprosthetic infection (PJI), such as the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) definition of PJI, are heavily reliant on synovial fluid laboratory results. Despite the importance of synovial fluid in PJI diagnosis, the effect of the quality of synovial fluid aspirate on testing results has not been studied. Our laboratory has established quality control parameters to identify synovial fluid aspirates that are highly diluted by saline or blood, which appear to degrade the diagnostic performance of synovial fluid laboratory tests.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of synovial fluid aspirates analyzed at one laboratory are of poor quality (defined as having a red blood count > 1M cells/uL or an optical density at 280 nm < 0.324 or > 1.19)? (2) Does a poor-quality aspirate decrease the sensitivities of International Consensus Meeting-based scores and other synovial fluid biomarker tests in terms of their ability to anticipate a positive culture?

METHODS

From January 2016 to July 2019, a total of 123,549 synovial fluid samples were submitted to one laboratory for the purpose of diagnostic testing. Of these, 14% (16,773 of 123,549) samples were excluded because they were from a site other than a hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty, and an additional 33% (35,660 of 106,776) were excluded due to insufficient requested tests, resulting in 58% (71,116 of 123,549) samples included in this study. Specimens diluted with extreme levels of saline or blood were identified (defined as having a red blood count >1 M cells/uL or an optical density at 280 nm < 0.324 or > 1.19) as poor-quality aspirates. The sensitivities of synovial fluid C-reactive protein, alpha defensin, neutrophil elastase, white blood cell count, polymorphonuclear cell percentage, and the 2018 ICM-based tool were assessed in good-quality versus poor-quality synovial fluid samples. To avoid bias from using these evaluated tests within the reference definition of PJI in this study, a positive culture resulting from the synovial fluid served as the reference diagnosis defining a control cohort of PJI-positive samples. Although the low false-positive rate of synovial fluid culture allows for the valid estimation of synovial fluid test sensitivity, the high false-negative rate of synovial fluid culture prevents the valid estimation of test specificity, which was not evaluated in this study.

RESULTS

Of the samples analyzed, 8% (6025 of 71,116) were found to have poor quality, in that they were substantially compromised by saline and/or blood. The sensitivity of all tests to detect culture-positive synovial fluid was lower in poor-quality than in good-quality samples: 2018 International Consensus Meeting-based tool (83% [95% CI 80 to 86] versus 97% [95% CI 96 to 97]), synovial fluid C-reactive protein (65% [95% CI 61 to 69] versus 88% [95% CI 87 to 89]), alpha defensin (70% [95% CI 66 to 73] versus 93% [95% CI 93 to 94]), neutrophil elastase (80% [95% CI 77 to 83] versus 96% [95% CI 96 to 97]), synovial fluid white blood cell count (69% [95% CI 65 to 73] versus 93% [95% CI 93 to 94]), and the polymorphonuclear cell percentage (88% [95% CI 85 to 91] versus 95% [95% CI 94 to 95]), with all p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

When synovial fluid is substantially diluted with saline or blood, the biomarkers and cells being measured are also diluted, decreasing the sensitivity of laboratory testing. We recommend that future diagnostic studies exclude these samples because an artificial reduction in test sensitivity will be observed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinicians should avoid relying on negative synovial fluid testing to rule out PJI when the fluid submitted is substantially constituted of saline or blood. Further studies are necessary to understand the diagnostic utility, if any, of these diluted aspirate samples.

Saline lavage after a "dry tap"

AIMS

In patients with a "dry" aspiration during the investigation of prosthetic joint infection (PJI), saline lavage is commonly used to obtain a sample for analysis. The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively the impact of saline lavage on synovial fluid analysis in revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing revision hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) for any septic or aseptic indication were enrolled. Intraoperatively, prior to arthrotomy, the maximum amount of fluid possible was aspirated to simulate a dry tap (pre-lavage) followed by the injection with 20 ml of normal saline and re-aspiration (post-lavage). Pre- and post-lavage synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, percent polymorphonuclear cells (%PMN), and cultures were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients had data available for analysis; 17 underwent revision THA and 61 underwent revision TKA. A total of 16 patients met modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for PJI. Pre- and post-lavage %PMNs were similar in septic patients (87% vs 85%) and aseptic patients (35% vs 39%). Pre- and post-lavage synovial fluid WBC count were far more disparate in septic (53,553 vs 8,275 WBCs) and aseptic (1,103 vs 268 WBCs) cohorts. At a cutoff of 80% PMN, the post-lavage aspirate had a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 95%. At a cutoff of 3,000 WBCs, the post-lavage aspirate had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 98%. As the post-lavage synovial WBC count increased, the difference between pre- and post-lavage %PMN decreased (mean difference of 5% PMN in WBC < 3,000 vs mean difference 2% PMN in WBC > 3,000, p = 0.013). Of ten positive pre-lavage fluid cultures, only six remained positive post-lavage.

CONCLUSION

While saline lavage aspiration significantly lowered the synovial WBC count, the %PMN remained similar, particularly at WBC counts of > 3,000. These findings suggest that in patients with a dry-tap, the %PMN of a saline lavage aspiration has reasonable sensitivity (75%) for the detection of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):138-144.

Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Guided Joint Aspiration and Computed Tomography Findings for Prediction of Infected Hip Prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Infection after total hip arthroplasty remains a diagnostic challenge. We assessed the accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided joint aspiration combined with CT findings for prediction of septic hip prosthesis before revision surgery.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients (64.6% men; mean age, 68 years) scheduled for elective revision surgery due to suspicion of infection after total hip arthroplasty underwent CT-guided joint aspiration. Volume and microbiological cultures of aspirated fluid and salient findings on CT scans, including periprosthetic soft-tissue mass, malpositioning of the prosthesis, periprosthetic osteolysis, reactive enlarged lymph nodes, and heterotopic ossification, were assessed by a blinded radiologist.

RESULTS

Septic hip prosthesis was shown on revision surgery in 35 patients (36.4%), with Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated in 54.3% of cases. Culture of the aspirated fluid yielded the same microorganism in 24 patients (68.6%). The accuracy of preoperative CT-guided joint aspiration was 86.5%. High volume (>1 mL) of aspirated fluid was recorded in 32 patients (33.3%). In the multivariate analysis, high volume on CT aspiration, accumulation of soft tissue exceeding the joint margin, osteolysis without bone insufflation, and enlarged iliac lymph nodes were significant predictors of infected hip prosthesis. Similar results were obtained after adjustment of the model by the presence of aggressive granulomatosis.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT-guided joint aspiration is accurate to diagnose septic hip prosthesis based on CT imaging findings and volume and bacterial culture of the aspirated fluid. Enlarged iliac lymph nodes emerged as a strong predictor of infection.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum, Synovial, and Tissue Testing for Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip and Knee Replacements: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication that can occur following total joint replacement. Patients with chronic PJI report a substantially lower quality of life and face a higher risk of short-term mortality. Establishing a diagnosis of chronic PJI is challenging because of conflicting guidelines, numerous tests, and limited evidence. Delays in diagnosing PJI are associated with poorer outcomes and morbid revision surgery. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of serum, synovial, and tissue-based tests for chronic PJI.

METHODS

This review adheres to the Cochrane Collaboration's diagnostic test accuracy methods for evidence searching and syntheses. A detailed search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the grey literature was performed to identify studies involving the diagnosis of chronic PJI in patients with hip or knee replacement. Eligible studies were assessed for quality and bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-analyses were performed on tests with sufficient data points. Summary estimates and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curves were obtained using a bivariate model.

RESULTS

A total of 12,616 citations were identified, and 203 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these 203 studies, 170 had a high risk of bias. Eighty-three unique PJI diagnostic tests were identified, and 17 underwent meta-analyses. Laboratory-based synovial alpha-defensin tests and leukocyte esterase reagent (LER) strips (2+) had the best performance, followed by white blood-cell (WBC) count, measurement of synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) level, measurement of the polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%), and the alpha-defensin lateral flow test kit (Youden index ranging from 0.78 to 0.94). Tissue-based tests and 3 serum tests (measurement of interleukin-6 [IL-6] level, CRP level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) had a Youden index between 0.61 to 0.75 but exhibited poorer performance compared with the synovial tests mentioned above.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the literature pertaining to chronic PJI diagnostic tests is heterogeneous, and the studies are at a high risk for bias. We believe that greater transparency and more complete reporting in studies of diagnostic test results should be mandated by peer-reviewed journals. The available literature suggests that several synovial fluid-based tests perform well for diagnosing chronic PJI and their use is recommended in the work-up of any suspected case of chronic PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Joint aspiration, including culture of reaspirated saline after a 'dry tap', is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic joint infection

Aims

The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of culture of joint aspirate with and without saline injection-reaspiration.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of 580 hip and knee aspirations in patients who were deemed to have a moderate to high risk of infection, and who subsequently proceeded to revision arthroplasty over a period of 12 years. It was carried out at a large quaternary referral centre where preoperative aspiration is routine.

Results

Fluid was aspirated primarily in 313 (54%) cases and after saline injection-reaspiration of a 'dry tap' in 267 (46%) cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic aspirate were 84% (78% to 89%) and 85% (81% to 88%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of saline injection-reaspiration after 'dry tap' were 87% (79% to 92%) and 79% (72% to 84%) compared with 81% (71% to 88%) and 90% (85% to 93%) for direct aspiration.

Conclusion

Preoperative joint aspiration and culture is a sensitive and specific test for the confirmation of diagnosis in patients at a moderate to high risk of prosthetic joint infection. Culture of saline injection-reaspiration also provides accurate diagnostic information in the event of a 'dry tap'. Both methods allow susceptibility testing of relevant organisms and are therefore able to guide perioperative antibiotic therapy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:749-54.

Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: Cultures, Biomarker and Criteria

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are devastating complications after joint arthroplasty that continue to pose a diagnostic challenge. Currently, a single, stand-alone test with the adequate accuracy and reliability for diagnosis of PJI is not available; therefore, physicians who care for patients with PJI must rely on a combination of diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of PJI. This article reviews conventional laboratory test modalities, diagnostic accuracy and limitations of current tests, and novel emerging tests for the diagnosis of PJI.

Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The search for a single standard reference test for determining periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) through analysis of synovial fluid has yielded numerous biomarkers as potential candidates. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid biomarkers and to determine which test has the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

An online literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified 33 articles reporting a total of 13 major parameters for diagnosing PJI through analysis of synovial fluid. Each of the included articles was independently analyzed for risk of bias and for concerns regarding applicability utilizing the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool. The mada (meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy) tool was used to generate forest plots for sensitivity, specificity, and the log of the DOR, as well as summary statistics.

RESULTS

In this analysis, 13 index tests (leukocyte count; measurement of the percentage of polymorphonucleocytes [PMN%] and the levels of C-reactive protein [CRP], α-defensin, leukocyte esterase [LE], interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1β, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]; culture; and polymerase chain reaction [PCR] analysis) were evaluated on the basis of ≥2 articles. Of these tests, 8 (leukocyte count, PMN%, CRP, α-defensin, LE, IL-6, IL-8, and culture) were appropriate for pooled analysis. The overall sensitivity of these 8 markers was 0.85, and all but culture showed a sensitivity of ≥0.8. All markers showed a specificity of ≥0.9. Of the 8 tests, measurement of the α-defensin level showed the highest log DOR.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial fluid leukocyte count, PMN%, CRP, α-defensin, LE, IL-6, and IL-8 all demonstrated high sensitivity for diagnosing PJI, with α-defensin being the best synovial marker based on the highest log DOR. However, other synovial fluid tests that demonstrate good diagnostic performance can also be used in combination for the diagnosis of PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are patients being evaluated for periprosthetic joint infection prior to referral to a tertiary care center?

Background

Patients with a painful or failed total joint arthroplasties should be evaluated for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study is to determine if patients referred to a tertiary care center had been evaluated for PJI according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guidelines.

Methods

One hundred thirteen patients with painful hip (43) or knee (70) arthroplasties were referred to a single provider by orthopaedic surgeons outside our practice between 2012 and 2014. We retrospectively evaluated the workup by referring physicians, including measurement of serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, performance of a joint aspiration if these values were abnormal, and obtainment of synovial fluid white blood cell count, differential, and cultures.

Results

Sixty-two of 113 patients (55%) did not have a workup that followed AAOS guidelines. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were ordered for 64 of the 113 patients (57%). Of 25 patients with elevated inflammatory markers warranting aspiration, 15 (60%) had an aspiration attempted, with synovial fluid white blood cell, differential, and cultures obtained in 9 of 12 (75%) aspirations that yielded fluid. Of the 62 patients with an incomplete infection workup, 11 (18%) had a bone scan, 6 (10%) a computed tomography scan, and 3 (5%) a magnetic resonance imaging. Twelve of the 113 patients (11%) were ultimately diagnosed with PJI, with 5 undiagnosed prior to referral.

Conclusions

The AAOS guidelines to evaluate for PJI are frequently not being followed. Improving awareness of these guidelines may avoid unnecessary and costly evaluations and delay in the diagnosis of PJI.

Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?

BACKGROUND

Fluid samples obtained from an affected joint still play a central role in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It is the only preoperative test able to discover the causative microbiological agent. In the hip, fluid aspiration can be performed through fluoroscopy, ultrasound, or, less commonly, computed tomography. However, there is still a lack of consensus on which method is preferable in terms of efficacy and costbenefit.

PURPOSES

We, therefore, asked whether (1) the benefits in terms of sensitivity and specificity and (2) the costs were comparable between fluoroscopy- and ultrasound-guided joint aspirations in a suspicious of hip PJI.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2016, 52 hip aspirations were performed on 49 patients with clinical, radiological, or serological suspicion of PJI, waiting for a revision surgery. The patients were divided in two groups: fluoroscopy- (n = 26) vs ultrasound-guided hip aspiration group (n = 26). These groups were also divided in control and infected patients. The criteria of MusculoSkeletal Infection Society (MSIS) were used, as gold standard, to define PJI.

RESULTS

(1) Ultrasound-guided aspiration revealed valid sensitivity (89% vs 60%) and specificity (94% vs 81%) in comparison with fluoroscopic-guided aspiration. (2) The cost analysis was also in favor of ultrasound-guided aspiration (125.30€) than fluoroscopic-guided aspiration (343.58€).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that ultrasound-guided hip aspiration could represent a valid, safe, and less expensive diagnostic alternative to fluoroscopic-guided aspiration in hip PJI.

Diagnostic accuracy of arthroscopic biopsy in periprosthetic infections of the hip

Background

Diagnosis of a low-grade periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) prior to revision surgery can be challenging, despite paramount importance for further treatment. Arthroscopic biopsy of synovial and periprosthetic tissue with subsequent microbiological and histological examination can be beneficial but its specific diagnostic value has not been clearly defined.

Methods

20 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous synovial fluid aspiration as well as arthroscopic biopsy due to suspected PJI of the hip and subsequent one- or two-stage revision surgery at our institution between January 2012 and May 2015 were enrolled. Indication was based on the criteria (1) history of PJI and increased levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP), (2) suspicious cell count and differential but negative bacterial culture in synovial aspirate, (3) early loosening (<less than 2 years), or (4) persisting pain without loosening but history of a PJI. At least two criteria had to be fulfilled in order to perform an arthroscopic biopsy.

Results

Best overall diagnostic value was identified for arthroscopic biopsy and a combination of bacteriological and histological analysis with a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 100% and accuracy of 95%. Bacteriological assessment of synovial aspirate revealed a sensitivity of 50.0%, specificity of 91.7%, and accuracy of 75%. ESR and CRP yielded a sensitivity of 75.0% for either hematologic test and specificities of 87.5 and 66.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data indicate that arthroscopic biopsy is superior to ESR and CRP as well as joint aspiration and their combinations. Concurrent microbiological and histological examination of the biopsy specimens allows for identification of the causative pathogen and its susceptibility pattern in order to preoperatively plan the surgical strategy as well as the antibiotic regimen. Moreover, intraarticular mechanical failure can be detected during hip arthroscopy emphasizing its diagnostic value. Level II diagnostic study.

Management of the Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty

In the United Kingdom approximately 80,000 total hip arthroplasties are undertaken on an average each year. The popularity and demand for this operation are continually increasing. Our understanding of arthroplasty surgery and its complications has evolved greatly, and as a result infection rates are undeniably at an all-time low. The increasing volume of operations being performed does, however, mean that we still continue to see an increased number of cases of infection. There is no doubt that periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a complex clinical and diagnostic predicament to clinicians. Delay in the diagnosis and treatment of PJI can not only be detrimental in terms of patient morbidity, but it also poses a significant financial burden to health care institutions. It is therefore in the best interest of the patient, surgeon, and institution to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of this devastating complication. There remains considerable variability in terms of approach to diagnosis and treatment of PJI among orthopedic surgeons. In this review, we will, therefore, examine in detail the current body of evidence available on PJI. We will discuss the most robust and up-to-date methods of diagnosis and offer a comparison of management strategies.

Emperor's new clothes: Is particle disease really infected particle disease?

Aseptic loosening remains the most significant long-term complication of total hip replacement. The current paradigm points to an inflammatory response to wear particles as its main trigger. Recently, there have been increasing numbers of positive bacterial isolates reported among patients with clinically absent infection. This paper reviews existing evidence on possible involvement of bacteria and microbial-associated molecular patterns in the pathology of so-called "aseptic loosening." © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1497-1504, 2016.

Intraoperative synovial C-reactive protein is as useful as frozen section to detect periprosthetic hip infection

BACKGROUND

Synovial quantification of C-reactive protein (SCRP) has been recently published with high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. However, to our knowledge, no studies have compared the use of this test with intraoperative frozen section, which is considered by many to be the best intraoperative test now available.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether intraoperative SCRP could lead to comparable sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as intraoperative frozen section in revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed including 76 patients who underwent hip revision for any cause. SCRP quantification (using 9.5 mg/L as denoting infection) and the analysis of frozen section of intraoperative samples (five or more polymorphonuclear leukocytes under high magnification in 10 fields) were performed in all the patients. The definitive diagnosis of an infection was determined according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS). In this group, 30% of the patients were diagnosed with infection using the MSIS criteria (23 of 76 patients).

RESULTS

With the numbers available, there were no differences between SCRP and frozen section in terms of their ability to diagnose infection. The sensitivity of SCRP was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.8%-98.6%), the specificity was 94% (95% CI, 84.5%-98.7%), the positive predictive value was 87% (95% CI, 66.3%-97%), and the negative predictive value was 96% (95% CI, 87%-99.4%); the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were the same using frozen sections to diagnose infection. The positive likelihood ratio was 16.36 (95% CI, 5.4-49.5), indicating a low probability of an individual without the condition having a positive test, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.03-0.36), indicating low probability of an individual without the condition having a negative test.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that quantitative SCRP had similar diagnostic value as intraoperative frozen section with comparable sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value in a group of patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. In our institution, SCRP is easier to obtain, less expensive, and less dependent on the technique of obtaining and interpreting a frozen section. If our findings are confirmed by other groups, we suggest that quantitative SCRP be considered as a viable alternative to frozen section.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, diagnostic study.

Management of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection

Total hip joint replacement offers dramatic improvement in the quality of life but periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the most devastating complication of this procedure. The infection threatens the function of the joint, the preservation of the limb, and occasionally even the life of the patient due to long term hospitalization and high cost. For the surgeon it is a disastrous burden, which requires repeated, complicated procedures to eradicate infection and to provide a mobile joint without pain. Yet in the absence of a true gold standard, the diagnosis of PJI can be elusive. Synovial fluid aspiration, diagnostic imaging, traditional culture, peripheral serum inflammatory markers, and intraoperative frozen sections each have their limitations but continue to be the mainstay for diagnosis of PJI. Treatment options mainly include thorough irrigation and debridement with prosthesis retention, or a two-stage prosthesis exchange with intervening placement of an antibiotic-loaded spacer. Success in treating PJI depends on extensive surgical debridement and adequate and effective antibiotic therapy. Treatment in two stages using a spacer is recommended for most chronic PJI. Debridement, antibiotics and implant retention is the obvious choice for treatment of acute PJI, with good success rates in selected patients. This article presents an overview of recent management concepts for PJI of the hip emphasizing diagnosis and the clinical approach, and also share own experience at our institution.

Metabolic Pattern of Asymptomatic Hip-Prosthesis by 18F-FDG-Positron-Emission-Tomography

Background:

Joint replacement is a procedure with a major impact on the quality of life of patients with joint degenerative disease or traumatic injuries. However, some patients develop symptoms after the intervention caused by mechanical loosening or infection. Metabolic imaging by 18F-FDG-PET investigated in these patients isoften hampered by low specificity for diagnosis of possible septic vs. mechanical loosening. The reason for this shortcoming is to our opinion the unawareness of physiological remodeling processes that could be seen in asymptomatic patients.

Objectives:

In order to overcome this drawback, we aimed to find out the physiological metabolic functional pattern in asymptomatic patients with implanted hip prosthesis

Patients and Methods:

Twelve patients (6 males, 6 females); mean age 73 ± 7 (range 58 - 91) years were prospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were admitted to our department for oncological referral with implanted hip prostheses. All patients explained no symptoms with regard to their implanted prosthesis. The attenuation corrected images were used for analysis.

Results:

Fourteen hip prostheses in 12 patients were visually analyzed. Seven out of 14 prostheses among 12 patients showed focal periprosthetic enhanced metabolism, two of which showed two sites of enhanced uptake; whereas, the remaining five prostheses showed singular hypermetabolic areas within the periprosthetic site. The remaining seven prostheses in the other five patients showed no periprosthetic-enhanced uptake.

Conclusion:

Of the asymptomatic patients investigated, 58% showed focal enhanced periprosthetic glucose metabolism. This finding should be taken into consideration as a more probable unspecific metabolic pattern for correct interpretation of 18F-FDG-PET studies in patients with suspected septic loosening of the hip prosthesis.

Identification of periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is accepted as one of the most successful surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery, periprosthetic joint infection after THA continues to be one of the most devastating complications. However, accurate preoperative identification of periprosthetic joint infection in patients presenting with joint pain or radiographic periprosthetic lucencies is often difficult, even after a comprehensive work-up. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnostic options available to improve the management and results of this potentially catastrophic complication.

Prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a tremendous burden for individual patients as well as the global health care industry. While a small minority of joint arthroplasties will become infected, appropriate recognition and management are critical to preserve or restore adequate function and prevent excess morbidity. In this review, we describe the reported risk factors for and clinical manifestations of PJI. We discuss the pathogenesis of PJI and the numerous microorganisms that can cause this devastating infection. The recently proposed consensus definitions of PJI and approaches to accurate diagnosis are reviewed in detail. An overview of the treatment and prevention of this challenging condition is provided.

Preoperative aspiration culture for preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip or knee arthroplasty

This meta-analysis evaluated preoperative aspiration culture for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.78) and 0.95 (0.93 to 0.97), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed nonsignificant worse diagnostic performance for THA than for TKA (sensitivity, 0.70 versus 0.78; specificity, 0.94 versus 0.96). Preoperative aspiration culture has moderate to high sensitivity and very high specificity for diagnosing PJI.

Incidence of bacterial contamination in primary THA and combined hardware removal: analysis of preoperative aspiration and intraoperative biopsies

Prior fracture surgery in the setting of subsequent arthroplasty may confer an increased risk of infection. The current authors retrospectively reviewed 122 patients from 2006 to 2010. Joint aspirations performed preoperatively in two of 52 patients revealed bacterial growth. Preoperative CRP levels were elevated in 22.8% with a mean value of 10.4 mg/L (range 5.5 to 33.3). Intra-operative cultures were performed in 109 patients, with a single patient sample exhibiting bacterial growth (0.9%). Preoperative aspiration showed a sensitivity of 1.0 and specificity of 0.98 (P<0.039) for bacterial contamination. There was no postoperative periprosthetic infection noted. In conclusion the retrieval of internal fixation devices and total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely as a single stage procedure without significantly increasing the risk of periprosthetic infection.

Review article: Joint aspiration for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection

Joint aspiration is a reliable tool for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. There are different indications, techniques, and approaches for joint aspiration. We recommend that it be performed selectively when infection is suspected clinically. The specimens should be interpreted based on the results of the culture as well as the white cell count and differential. Specimen collection, transport, and analysis should be prompt to ensure yield accuracy.

Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Two-stage reconstruction, reimplantation after removal of an infected prosthesis, has been considered to be the gold standard for treatment of infected hip arthroplasty. However, during the removal of a well-fixed femoral stem, the proximal femur can be damaged and a sequestrum can be formed, which might lead to chronic osteomyelitis and difficulty in reimplantation. We wanted to determine whether infection after hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of a well-fixed stem.

METHODS

We treated 19 patients who had an infection after hip replacement, but a well-fixed cementless stem, with 2-stage reconstruction. At the first stage, we removed the acetabular cup, the liner and the head, but not the stem. We then implanted a cup of cement spacer. After control of infection, we reimplanted the acetabular component and head.

RESULTS

2 patients did not undergo second-stage reconstruction because they were satisfied with the pain relief and the activity that they had with the cement-spacer implantation. The remaining 17 patients underwent the second-stage of the reconstruction using cementless arthroplasty. At a mean follow-up time of 4 (2-8) years, 15 of the patients had no recurrence of infection, with satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcome.

INTERPRETATION

This second-stage reconstruction after retention of the stem could be an alternative treatment option for periprosthetic infection with a well-fixed stem.

Utility of synovial fluid aspirations in failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

White blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil percentage from preoperative synovial fluid aspirations are used to help determine the presence or absence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in failed total hip arthroplasty (THA). The clinical levels indicative of infection have not been delineated in metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings. We identified 39 patients who received a preoperative synovial fluid aspiration prior to MoM revision. Thirty-five of 39 cases were culture negative and 4 of 39 were culture positive. WBC count >3000 cells/μL was 100% sensitive and 57.1% specific. Neutrophil percentage >80% was 100% sensitive and 97.1% specific. Both CRP and ESR >8.0mg/L and >22 mm/h, respectively were 75.0% sensitive and 67.6% specific. Our data suggest that synovial WBC count and serum ESR and CRP have poor predictive value in diagnosing PJI for failed MoM THA, whereas synovial neutrophil percentage is a highly accurate marker for diagnosing infection in this patient population.

High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip

BACKGROUND

The role of the synovial biopsy in the preoperative diagnosis of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip has not been clearly defined.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether the value of a biopsy for a PJI is greater than that of aspiration and C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

Before revision in 100 hip endoprostheses, we obtained CRP values, aspirated the joint, and obtained five synovial biopsy samples for bacteriologic analysis and five for histologic analysis. Microbiologic and histologic analyses of the periprosthetic tissue during revision surgery were used to verify the results of the preoperative diagnostic methods. The minimum followup was 24 months (median 32; range, 24-47 months).

RESULTS

Forty-five of the 100 prostheses were identified as infected. The biopsy, with a combination of the bacteriologic and histologic examinations, showed the greatest diagnostic value of all the diagnostic procedures and led to a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI, ± 11%), specificity of 98% (95% CI, ± 4%), positive predictive value of 97% (95% CI, ± 5%), negative predictive value of 87% (95% CI, ± 8.3%), and accuracy of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

The biopsy technique has a greater value than aspiration and CRP in the diagnosis of PJI of the hip (Masri et al. J Arthroplasty 22:72-78, 2007). In patients with a negative aspirate, but increased CRP or clinical signs of infection, we regard biopsy to be preferable to just repeating the aspiration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous interface biopsy in dry-aspiration cases of chronic periprosthetic joint infections: a technique for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism

PURPOSE

Preoperative identification of the infecting micro-organism is of paramount importance in the treatment protocol for chronic periprosthetic joint infections, as it enables selection of the most appropriate antibiotic treatment. Preoperative joint aspiration, the most commonly used sampling technique, has proven to have a broad range of sensitivity values and the frequency of dry aspirations has not been well assessed. In such dry-tap cases a biopsy sample could be an option. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous interface biopsy (PIB) in isolating the infecting organism in cases of chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) and dry-tap event. The basic technique is to harvest and culture a sample from the periprosthetic interface membrane by a percutaneous technique in the preoperative period.

METHODS

A retrospective study was done involving 24 consecutive patients suspected of PJI and where no fluid was obtained from the joint. Culture results from a percutaneous interface biopsy (PIB) were compared with intraoperative tissue cultures at the time of revision surgery. In all cases, a two-stage replacement was done.

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 88.2%; specificity was 100%. Positive predictive value was 100%, while negative predictive value was 77.9%. Accuracy was 91.6%. No technique-related complication was observed.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that PIB is a useful test for preoperative isolation of the infecting organism and could play a role in cases with dry-tap joint aspirations.

Accuracy of CT-guided joint aspiration in patients with suspected infection status post-total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of guided computed tomography aspiration in the detection of septic hip prosthesis before surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients (35 women and 28 men; age range, 29-86 years; mean age, 71 years) with clinically suspected septic hip prosthesis were prospectively studied with independent review board (IRB) approval. Volume and microbiological cultures of aspirated fluid and several computed tomography imaging findings such as periprosthetic fluid collections, prosthetic acetabular malposition, and heterotopic ossification were analyzed. All patients underwent revision surgery and infection was finally diagnosed in 33 patients.

RESULTS

Statistical comparative analysis was performed comparing computed tomography aspiration and surgical findings (95% CI; level of significance at P=0.05 two-sided) with 70% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 84% accuracy, 100% positive predictive value, and 75% negative predictive value. Using Fisher's exact test, the presence of periprosthetic fluid collections (P=0.001), prosthetic acetabular malposition (P=0.025) and aspirated fluid volume (P=0.009) were significantly higher in infected than in non-infected prostheses, whereas heterotopic ossification was not (P=0.429).

CONCLUSION

Computed tomography aspiration is accurate to preoperatively diagnose septic hip prosthesis on the basis of volume and bacterial cultures of aspirated joint fluid. Furthermore, imaging findings such as periprosthetic fluid collections and prosthetic acetabular malposition strongly suggest infected prosthesis.

Combining C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 may be useful to detect periprosthetic hip infection

BACKGROUND

The sensitivity and specificity to detect periprosthetic infection of the different methods have been questioned, and no single laboratory test accurately detects infection before revision arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) could lead to similar sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values as our previous results obtained with intraoperative frozen section (FS) in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We prospectively followed 69 patients who had undergone revision THA for failure of a primary THA. The definitive diagnosis of an infection was determined on the basis of positive histopathologic evidence of infection or growth of bacteria on culture.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 69 hips were infected. The combination of an elevated CRP and IL-6 was correlated with deep infection in all the cases and showed a sensitivity of 0.57 (0.13-1.00), a specificity of 1.00 (0.99-1.00), a positive predictive value of 1.00 (0.87-1.00), and a negative predictive value of 0.94 (0.87-1.00). FS showed a sensitivity of 0.81 (0.54-1.00), a specificity of 0.98 (0.94-1.00), a positive predictive value of 0.90 (0.66-1.00), and a negative predictive value of 0.96 (0.91-1.00). Combining CRP and IL-6 provided similar sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values as the FSs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest the combination of CRP and IL-6 would be a useful serologic tool to complement others when diagnosing periprosthetic infection.

Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection?

BACKGROUND

Successful treatment of an infected joint arthroplasty depends on correctly identifying the responsible pathogens. The value of a preoperative biopsy remains controversial.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We (1) compared the sensitivity and specificity of both tests separately and in combination, and (2) asked whether the combination of tissue biopsy and aspiration would improve our diagnostic yield in the evaluation of periprosthetic joint infections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively followed 120 patients with suspected infection of a total joint arthroplasty: 64 with THAs and 56 with TKAs. All patients had aspiration with culture and biopsy.

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 83% for aspiration, 79% for biopsy, and 90% for the combination of both techniques. The specificity was 100% for aspiration and biopsy and the combination. The overall accuracy was 84%, 81%, and 90%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest tissue biopsy alone offers no clear advantage over joint aspiration. However, the combination of both techniques provides improved sensitivity and accuracy. We recommend the use of tissue biopsy as an adjunct to joint aspiration in the diagnosis of total joint infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While multiple tests are used to determine the presence of infection at the site of a total hip arthroplasty, few studies have applied a consistent algorithm to determine the utility of the various tests that are available. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utility of commonly available tests for determining the presence of periprosthetic infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-five consecutive total hip arthroplasties in 220 patients were evaluated by one of two surgeons using a consistent algorithm to identify infection and were treated with reoperation. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-point values for the white blood-cell count and the percentage of polymorphonuclear cells of intraoperatively aspirated hip synovial fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy were determined. Patients were considered to have an infection if two of three criteria were met; the three criteria were a positive intraoperative culture, gross purulence at the time of reoperation, and positive histopathological findings.

RESULTS

Thirty-four arthroplasties were excluded because of the presence of a draining sinus, incomplete data, or a preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, leaving 201 total hip arthroplasties available for evaluation. Fifty-five hips were judged to be infected. No hip in a patient with a preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate of <30 mm/hr and a C-reactive protein level of <10 mg/dL was determined to be infected. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis of the synovial fluid illustrated optimal cut-points to be >4200 white blood cells/mL for the white blood-cell count and >80% polymorphonuclear cells for the differential count. However, when combined with an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level, the optimal cut-point for the synovial fluid cell count was >3000 white blood cells/mL, which yielded the highest combined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the tests studied.

DISCUSSION

A synovial fluid cell count of >3000 white blood cells/mL was the most predictive perioperative testing modality in our study for determining the presence of periprosthetic infection when combined with an elevated preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection following total hip arthroplasty--evaluation of the diagnostic values of pre- and intraoperative parameters and the associated strategy to preoperatively select patients with a high probability of joint infection

Background

The correct diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is crucial for adequate surgical treatment. The detection may be a challenge since presentation and preoperative tests are not always obvious and precise. This prospective study was performed to evaluate a variety of pre- and intraoperative investigations. Furthermore a detailed evaluation of concordance of each preoperative diagnosis was performed, together with a final diagnosis to assess the accuracy of the pre-operative assumption of PJI.

Methods

Between 01/2005 and 02/2007, a prospective analysis was performed in 50 patients, who had a two stage revision because of assumed PJI. Based on clinical presentation, radiography, haematological screening, or early failure, infection was assumed and a joint aspiration was performed. Depending upon these findings, a two stage revision was performed, with intra-operative samples for culture and histological evaluation obtained. Final diagnosis of infection was based upon the interpretation of the clinical presentation and the pre- and intraoperative findings.

Results

In 37 patients a positive diagnosis of PJI could be made definitely. The histopathology yielded the highest accuracy (0.94) in identification of PJI and identified 35 of 37 infections (sensitivity 0.94, specificity 0.94, positive-/negative predictive value 0.97/0.86). Intra-operative cultures revealed sensitivities, specificities, positive-/negative predictive values and accuracy of 0.78, 0.92, 0.96, 0.63 and 0.82. These values for blood screening tests were 0.95, 0.62, 0.88, 0.80, and 0.86 respectively for the level of C-reactive protein, and 0.14, 0.92, 0.83, 0.29 and, 0.34 respectively for the white blood-cell count. The results of aspiration were 0.57, 0.5, 0.78, 0.29, and 0.54.

Conclusion

The detection of PJI is still a challenge in clinical practice. The histopathological evaluation emerges as a highly practical diagnostic tool in detection of PJI. Furthermore, we found a discrepancy between the pre-operative suspicion of PJI and the final post-operative diagnosis, resulting in a slight uncertainty in whether loosening is due to bacterial infection or not. The variation in accuracy of the single tests may influence the detection of PJI. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level I.

Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antibiotic-impregnated cement is used as a spacer or during re-implantation surgery for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasties. The routine use of antibiotic-impregnated cement during primary or uninfected revision total hip arthroplasty remains controversial. With this meta-analysis of the published literature, we intended to assess efficacy and safety in the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement for uninfected arthroplasty.

METHODS

Following a detailed literature search, only studies reporting on the outcome of total hip replacement performed with antibiotic cement were included. Strict inclusion criteria were used and studies lacking sufficient sample size or critical data were excluded. 19 studies reporting on 36,033 hip replacements in 35,659 patients met the initial inclusion criteria. The main aim of the meta-analysis was to determine the rate of deep infection with and without the use of antibiotic cement, and to assess the revision rate and the ultimate survivorship of arthroplasty using antibiotic cement.

RESULTS

The rate of deep infection following primary total hip arthroplasty, at 1.2%, was significantly lower when antibiotic cement was used than when cement without antibiotics was used (2.3%). Similarly, the rate of deep infection following revision total hip arthroplasty when a standard combination of cement and antibiotic--or a custom-made combination of cement and antibiotic, depending on the results of culture--was used, was almost half of the rate of deep infection when no antibiotics were present in the cement. Overall, the survivorship was 98% (101 failures in 5,178 hips) for primary arthroplasty and 88% (100 failures in 855 hips) for revision arthroplasty. There were no reported adverse events or complications associated with the use of antibiotic-impregnated cement.

INTERPRETATION

The use of antibiotic-impregnated cement lowered the infection rate by approximately 50% in primary hip arthroplasty. For revisions of previously infected hips, combinations or culture-dependent antibiotics lowered infection rates by approximately 40%.

Critical role of 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the management of patients with arthroplasty

The most frequent complications after arthroplasty are aseptic loosening and infection. It is often difficult to differentiate aseptic loosening from infection. The management of these two distinct clinical identities is quite different, however. Treatment of aseptic loosening usually requires one-step revision surgery, whereas treatment of infection requires antimicrobial therapy for an extended period before inserting a new prosthesis. Infection associated with arthroplasty is a serious complication and should be treated adequately before proceeding with a surgical intervention. PET with 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been proposed as an accurate technique for evaluating painful arthroplasty. This review addresses the applications of FDG-PET in such clinical settings. In addition, the potential of PET in the assessing the viability of bone grafts in revision arthroplasty is discussed.

Frozen sections of samples taken intraoperatively for diagnosis of infection in revision hip surgery

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of a suspected infected prosthesis is often difficult, but is important for the choice of treatment. Even at surgery, it is not easy to assess whether the prosthesis is infected or not--even though this may be important for the choice of surgical procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and reliability of the results of the analysis of frozen sections from samples of tissues taken during revision hip surgery of 136 probably infected prostheses. Samples of tissues were taken to be analyzed immediately from frozen sections, to be processed on a routine basis later, and to be referred for bacteriological cultures. A finding of 5 or more polymorphonuclear leukocytes per field at a magnification of 400x was considered positive for infection.

RESULTS

The analysis of frozen sections for infection was in agreement with the results of routine histopathology in 134 of 136 cases. Comparison with the results of culture showed a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 87%, a PPV of 79%, an NPV of 91%, and a Kendall's tau correlation coefficient of 0.72.

INTERPRETATION

We believe that the method we have tested is of value in revision surgery when infection cannot be ruled out.

Imaging of musculoskeletal infections

Imaging procedures are routinely used to evaluate patients suspected of having musculoskeletal infection. Radiographs should be performed whenever musculoskeletal infection is suspected. Even when not diagnostic, radiographs are useful. They provide an anatomic overview of the region of interest, including pre-existing conditions that could influence the selection and interpretation of subsequent procedures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sensitive, provides superb anatomic detail, does not use ionizing radiation, and is rapidly completed. This technique is especially valuable for septic arthritis, spinal osteomyelitis, and diabetic foot infections. Among the radionuclide procedures, three-phase bone imaging is readily available, and very accurate in unviolated bone. Labeled leukocyte imaging should be used in cases of 'complicating osteomyelitis' such as prosthetic joint infections. This test is also useful in unsuspected diabetic pedal osteomyelitis and the neuropathic joint. Gallium imaging is a useful adjunct to MIR in spinal infection. 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) will likely play an important role, especially in the evaluation of spinal infection.