The role of intraoperative gram stain in the diagnosis of infection during revision total hip arthroplasty

The mononuclear phagocyte system obscures the accurate diagnosis of infected joint replacements

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosing infected joint replacements relies heavily on assessing the neutrophil response to bacteria. Bacteria form biofilms on joint replacements. Biofilms are sessile bacterial communities encased in a protective extracellular matrix, making them notoriously difficult to culture, remarkably tolerant to antibiotics, and able to evade phagocytosis. Phagocytized bacteria dramatically alter cytokine production and compromise macrophage antigen presentation. We hypothesize that a subset of joint replacements have a dormant infection that suppresses the neutrophil response to bacteria but can be distinguished from uninfected joint replacements by the response of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) within periarticular tissue, synovial fluid, and circulating plasma.

METHODS

Single cell RNASeq transcriptomic and OLink proteomic profiling was performed on matched whole blood, synovial fluid, and periarticular tissue samples collected from 4 joint replacements with an active infection and 3 joint replacements without infection as well as 6 joint replacements with a prior infection deemed "infection-free" by the 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria (follow-up of 26 ± 3 months).

RESULTS

The MPS and neutrophil responses differ by infected state; the cellular distribution of the MPS response in the subset of joints with dormant infections resembled actively infected joints (p = 0.843, Chi-square test) but was significantly different from uninfected joints (p < 0.001, Chi-square test) despite the absence of systemic acute phase reactants and recruitment of neutrophils (p < 0.001, t-test). When compared to no infection, the cellular composition of dormant infection was distinct. There was reduction in classically activated M1 macrophages (p < 0.001, Fischer's test) and alternatively activated M2 macrophages coupled with an increase in classical monocytes (p < 0.001, Fischer's test), myeloid dendritic cells (p < 0.001, Fischer's test), regulatory T-cells (p < 0.001, Fischer's test), natural killer cells (p = 0.009, Fischer's test), and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (p = 0.005, Fischer's test). Hierarchical cluster analysis and single-cell gene expression revealed that classically M1 and alternatively M2 activated macrophages as well as myeloid dendritic cells can independently distinguish the dormant and uninfected patient populations suggesting that a process that modulates neutrophil recruitment (C1QA, C1QB, LY86, SELL, CXCL5, CCL20, CD14, ITGAM), macrophage polarization (FOSB, JUN), immune checkpoint regulation (IFITM2, IFITM3, CST7, THBS1), and T-cell response (VISIG4, CD28, FYN, LAT2, FCGR3A, CD52) was occurring during dormant infection. Gene set variation analysis suggested that activation of the TNF (FDR < 0.01) and IL17 (FDR < 0.01) pathways may distinguish dormant infections from the active and uninfected populations, while an inactivation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) may be involved in the lack of a clinical response to a dormant infection using established diagnostic criteria. Synovial inflammatory proteomics show an increase in synovial CXCL5 associated with dormant infection (p = 0.011, t-test), suggesting the establishment of a chronic inflammatory state by the MPS during a dormant infection involved in neutrophil inhibition. Plasma inflammatory proteomics also support a chronic inflammatory state (EGF, GZMN, FGF2, PTN, MMP12) during dormant infection that involves a reduction in neutrophil recruitment (CXCL5, p = 0.006, t-test), antigen presentation (LAMP3, p = 0.047, t-test), and T-cell function (CD28, p = 0.045, t-test; CD70, p = 0.002, t-test) that are also seen during the development of bacterial tolerance.

DISCUSSION

All current diagnostic criteria assume each patient can mount the same neutrophil response to an implant-associated infection. However, the state of the MPS is of critical importance to accurate diagnosis of an implant-associated infection. A reduction in neutrophil recruitment and function mediated by the MPS may allow joint replacements with a dormant infection to be mischaracterized as uninfected, thus limiting the prognostic capabilities of all current diagnostic tests.

Update on the role of pathology and laboratory medicine in diagnosing periprosthetic infection

Technological and implant design advances have helped reduce the frequency of aseptic total joint arthroplasty failure, but periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a clinical important problem with high patient morbidity. Misinterpreting PJI as aseptic mechanical loosening commonly leads to unsatisfactory revision arthroplasty, persistent infection, and poor long-term results. While there is no single "gold standard" diagnostic test for PJI, recent collaborative efforts by Orthopaedic and Infectious Disease Societies have developed algorithms for diagnosing PJI. However, the efficacy of individual tests as well as diagnostic thresholds are controversial. We review the recommended thresholds for commonly used screening tests as well as tissue histopathology and confirmatory tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. We also update lesser-known laboratory tests, and we briefly summarize rapidly evolving molecular tests to diagnose periprosthetic infection. Pathologists hold a critical role in assisting with PJI diagnosis, maintaining laboratory test quality and interpreting test results. Collaboration between clinicians and pathologists is essential to provide optimal patient care and reduce the burden of PJI.

Management of septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infection

Management of joint infection is an evolving topic. This article reviews the literature on the management of native and prosthetic joint infection and suggests some areas of improvement in short- and long-term management which could lead to better patient outcomes. Surgical management is the mainstay of treatment for native or prosthetic knee infection and aspiration should only be used for diagnostic purposes. A multidisciplinary team approach and compliance with national guidelines, alongside referral networks and pooling of expertise, should be mandatory to improve patient outcomes.

The low sensitivity of direct smears limit the utility of intraoperative gram stains for predicting culture-positivity in acute surgical settings

The role of intraoperative Gram stains in acute surgery decision-making is unclear. Our retrospective chart review of microbiology results for specimens submitted by acute surgery attendings showed Gram stain performs with a sensitivity ranging from 18% to 65% compared to culture, depending on organism type, thus limiting its utility.

Patients with no recurrence of infection five years after two-stage revision hip arthroplasty may be classified as periprosthetic infection 'in remission'

AIMS

We aimed to report the mid- to long-term rates of septic and aseptic failure after two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 96 cases which met the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for PJI. The mean follow-up was 90 months (SD 32). Septic failure was assessed using a Delphi-based consensus definition. Any further surgery undertaken for aseptic mechanical causes was considered as aseptic failure. The cumulative incidence with competing risk analysis was used to predict the risk of septic failure. A regression model was used to evaluate factors associated with septic failure. The cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 23 septic failures at final follow-up, with a cumulative incidence of 14% (95% confidence interval (CI) 8% to 22%) at one year, 18% (95% CI 11% to 27%) at two years, 22% (95% CI 14% to 31%) at five years, and 23% (95% CI 15% to 33%) at ten years. Having at least one positive culture (hazard ratio (HR) 2.38 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.19 to 4.74); p = 0.013), or a positive intraoperative frozen section (HR 2.55 (IQR 1.06 to 6.15); p = 0.037) was significantly associated with septic failure after reimplantation. With dislocation being the most common cause of aseptic revision (5.2%), the cumulative incidence of aseptic failure was 1% (95% CI 0% to 5%) at one year, 6% (95% CI 1% to 8%) at five years, and 8% (95%CI 3% to 17%) at ten years.

CONCLUSION

If there is no recurrent infection in the five years following reimplantation, the chances of further infection thereafter are remote. While the results of a frozen section may be a reliable guide to the timing of reimplantation, intraoperative culture has, currently, only prognostic value. Surgeons should be aware that instability remains a potential indication for further revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):79-86.

Diagnosis of peripheral bone and prosthetic joint infections: overview on the consensus documents by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement)

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral bone infection (PBI) and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are two different infectious conditions of the musculoskeletal system. They have in common to be quite challenging to be diagnosed and no clear diagnostic flowchart has been established. Thus, a conjoined initiative on these two topics has been initiated by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). The purpose of this work is to provide an overview on the two consensus documents on PBI and PJI that originated by the conjoined work of the ESR, EANM, and EBJIS (with ESCMID endorsement).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search, a list of 18 statements for PBI and 25 statements for PJI were drafted in consensus on the most debated diagnostic challenges on these two topics, with emphasis on imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, white blood cell scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities for the diagnosis of PBI and PJI. However, the choice of which advanced diagnostic modality to use first depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience of imaging specialists, costs, and availability. Since robust, comparative studies among most tests do not exist, the proposed flowcharts are based not only on existing literature but also on the opinion of multiple experts involved on these topics.

KEY POINTS

• For peripheral bone infection and prosthetic joint infection, white blood cell and magnetic resonance imaging have individually demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over other imaging modalities. • Two evidence- and expert-based diagnostic flowcharts involving variable combination of laboratory tests, biopsy methods, and radiological and nuclear medicine imaging modalities are proposed by a multi-society expert panel. • Clinical application of these flowcharts depends on several factors, such as the benefit for the patient, local experience, costs, and availability.

Risk Factors for Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

To report culturing patterns and results in the setting of presumed aseptic revision spinal surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The indications for obtaining cultures in revision spinal surgery remain unclear in the absence of a definitive diagnosis of infection. Culture results and risk factors for having positive cultures in this setting have not been previously studied.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 595 consecutive revision spine surgeries performed by four senior spine surgeons between 2008 and 2013. Preoperative workup revealed the diagnosis of infection in 17 cases which were excluded from review. The remaining 578 presumed aseptic cases were included. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with obtaining cultures and risk factors for positive cultures.

RESULTS

Cultures were obtained in 112 (19.4%) cases and were positive in 40.2%. Pseudarthrosis was the most common revision diagnosis when cultures were obtained (49.1%) and Propionibacterium acnes was the most common organism isolated from positive cultures (48.8%). Regarding culture results, multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4) and pseudarthrosis (OR = 4.1) were significantly associated with having positive cultures while fusion procedures (OR = 0.3) were negatively correlated, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.71.

CONCLUSION

Unexpected positive cultures occurred commonly and P. acnes was the predominant isolated organism. Male sex, pseudarthrosis, and non-fusion cases predicted positive cultures. Considering these results, we recommend cultures be obtained in revision cases for pseudarthrosis, even in the setting of negative infectious work-up preoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Is Gram staining still useful in prosthetic joint infections?

Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is an independent risk factor for DAIR failure in patients with a late acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Therefore, identifying the causative microorganism in an acute setting may help to decide if revision surgery should be chosen as a first surgical approach in patients with additional risk factors for DAIR failure. The aim of our study was to determine the sensitivity of Gram staining in late acute S. aureus PJI.

Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients between 2005-2015 who were diagnosed with late acute PJI due to S. aureus. Late acute PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms and signs of PJI, at least three months after the index surgery. Symptoms existing for more than three weeks were excluded from the analysis. Gram staining was evaluated solely for synovial fluid.

Results: A total of 52 cases were included in the analysis. Gram staining was positive with Gram positive cocci in clusters in 31 cases (59.6%). Patients with a C-reactive protein (CRP) > 150 mg/L at clinical presentation had a significantly higher rate of a positive Gram stain (30/39, 77%) compared to patients with a CRP ≤ 150 mg/L (4/10, 40%) (p=0.02). A positive Gram stain was not related to a higher failure rate (60.6% versus 57.9%, p 0.85).

Conclusion: Gram staining may be a useful diagnostic tool in late acute PJI to identify S. aureus PJI. Whether a positive Gram stain should lead to revision surgery instead of DAIR should be determined per individual case.

Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement)

Background

For the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection, real evidence-based guidelines to aid clinicians in choosing the most accurate diagnostic strategy are lacking.

Aim and Methods

To address this need, we performed a multidisciplinary systematic review of relevant nuclear medicine, radiological, orthopaedic, infectious, and microbiological literature to define the diagnostic accuracy of each diagnostic technique and to address and provide evidence-based answers on uniform statements for each topic that was found to be important to develop a commonly agreed upon diagnostic flowchart.

Results and Conclusion

The approach used to prepare this set of multidisciplinary guidelines was to define statements of interest and follow the procedure indicated by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (OCEBM).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-4263-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Qualitative α-defensin test (Synovasure) for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in revision total joint arthroplasty

AIMS

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains demanding due to limitations of all the available diagnostic tests. The synovial fluid marker, α-defensin, is a promising adjunct for the assessment of potential PJI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the qualitative assessment of α-defensin, using Synovasure to detect or exclude periprosthetic infection in total joint arthroplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 50 patients (28 women, 22 men, mean age 65 years; 20 to 89) with a clinical indication for revision arthroplasty who met the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study. The presence of α-defensin was determined using the qualitative Synovasure test and compared with standard diagnostic methods for PJI. Based on modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, 13 cases were categorised as septic and 36 as aseptic revisions. One test was inconclusive.

RESULTS

The Synovasure test achieved a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 94%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios were 12.46 and 0.33, respectively. A good diagnostic accuracy for PJI, with an area under the curve of 0.82, was demonstrated. Adjusted p-values using the method of Hochberg showed that Synovasure is as good at diagnosing PJI as histology (p = 0.0042) and bacteriology with one positive culture (p = 0.0327).

CONCLUSION

With its ease of use and rapid results after approximately ten minutes, Synovasure may be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of PJI. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:66-72.

Intraoperative Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using a Novel Alpha-Defensin Lateral Flow Assay

BACKGROUND

The present study investigates the novel Synovasure periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) lateral flow test device for detection of alpha-defensin and attempts to determine its diagnostic accuracy for the intraoperative diagnosis of PJI and compares it to frozen section.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients, who underwent revision surgery, between September 2014 and September 2015 were included. The patients underwent 29 revision total knee arthroplasties and 11 revision total hip arthroplasties. Twelve patients had a confirmed PJI based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, and 28 patients were considered aseptic.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy to detect PJI using the lateral flow assay was 85% (95% CI 70%-93%). The device has a positive predictive value of 80% (95% CI 44%-96%) and a negative predictive value of 87% (95% CI 68%-96%) and showed a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 35%-89%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI 75%-99%). Frozen section had a lower sensitivity (58% [95% CI 29%-84%]) but a higher specificity (96% [95% CI 80%-100%]). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrates an area under the curve of the Synovasure PJI Lateral Flow Test Kit and frozen section of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that the intraoperative lateral flow test is at least equivalent to intraoperative frozen section and is a useful tool to confirm the absence of PJI. Although the clinical results are promising, they are not as good as previous studies using alpha-defensin levels measured in a laboratory.

Optimal Length of Cultivation Time for Isolation of Propionibacterium acnes in Suspected Bone and Joint Infections Is More than 7 Days

Diagnosis of Propionibacterium acnes bone and joint infection is challenging due to the long cultivation time of up to 14 days. We retrospectively studied whether reducing the cultivation time to 7 days allows accurate diagnosis without losing sensitivity. We identified patients with at least one positive P. acnes sample between 2005 and 2015 and grouped them into "infection" and "no infection." An infection was defined when at least two samples from the same case were positive. Clinical and microbiological data, including time to positivity for different cultivation methods, were recorded. We found 70 cases of proven P. acnes infection with a significant faster median time to positivity of 6 days (range, 2 to 11 days) compared to 9 days in 47 cases with P. acnes identified as a contamination (P < 0.0001). In 15 of 70 (21.4%) patients with an infection, tissue samples were positive after day 7 and in 6 patients (8.6%) after day 10 when a blind subculture of the thioglycolate broth was performed. The highest sensitivity was detected for thioglycolate broth (66.3%) and the best positive predictive values for anaerobic agar plates (96.5%). A prolonged transportation time from the operating theater to the microbiological laboratory did not influence time to positivity of P. acnes growth. By reducing the cultivation time to 7 days, false-negative diagnoses would increase by 21.4%; thus, we recommend that biopsy specimens from bone and joint infections be cultivated to detect P. acnes for 10 days with a blind subculture at the end.

Utility of Fresh Frozen Section Analysis in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Pilot Study

The use of intraoperative fresh frozen section (FFS) analysis to determine the presence of infection has been well reported in orthopedic studies. Specifically, the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field has been used to diagnose total joint arthroplasty-related infection. Less commonly, reconstructive surgeons have extended the use of FFS analysis for intraoperative evaluation when suspicion of deep infection with or without hardware is high. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively review the data from 11 patients undergoing foot and ankle reconstruction in the setting of possible deep infection and determine the usefulness of FFS analysis. A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who had undergone reconstructive foot and ankle revision surgery with intraoperative FFS analysis and tissue/swab cultures available was performed. A positive FFS was defined as >5 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. A positive frozen section was associated with a positive tissue culture 4 of 7 times (57%). The sensitivity and specificity of FFS analysis for infection was 80% and 50%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value of the FFS result was 57.1% and 75%, respectively. In conclusion, FFS analysis and intraoperative cultures correlated only 57% of the time in the present series. This test had moderate sensitivity for detecting infection at 80%, but the specificity was poor (50%). More research is needed to further evaluate the role of FFS analysis in foot and ankle surgery.

The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Intraoperative cultures and Gram stains are often obtained in cases of revision spine surgery even when clinical signs of infection are not present. The clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of this behavior remain unproven.

PURPOSE

The aim was to evaluate the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine intraoperative Gram stains in revision spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective clinical review performed at an academic center in an urban setting.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred twenty-nine consecutive adult revision spine surgeries were performed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures included intraoperative Gram stains.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 594 consecutive revision spine surgeries performed by four senior surgeons between 2008 and 2013 to identify patients who had operative cultures and Gram stains performed. All revision cases including cervical, thoracic, and lumbar fusion and non-fusion, with and without instrumentation were reviewed. One hundred twenty-nine (21.7%) patients had operative cultures obtained and were included in the study.

RESULTS

The most common primary diagnosis code at the time of revision surgery was pseudarthrosis, which was present in 41.9% of cases (54 of 129). Infection was the primary diagnosis in 10.1% (13 of 129) of cases. Operative cultures were obtained in 129 of 595 (21.7%) cases, and 47.3% (61 of 129) were positive. Gram stains were performed in 98 of 129 (76.0%) cases and were positive in 5 of 98 (5.1%) cases. Overall, there was no correlation between revision diagnosis and whether or not a Gram stain was obtained (p=.697). Patients with a history of prior instrumentation were more likely to have a positive Gram stain (p<.0444). Intraoperative Gram staining was found to have a sensitivity of 10.9% (confidence interval [CI] 3.9%-23.6%) and specificity of 100% (CI 93.1%-100%). The positive and negative predictive values were 100% (CI 48.0%-100%) and 57.3% (CI 45.2%-66.2%), respectively. Kappa coefficient was calculated to be 0.1172 (CI 0.0194-0.2151). The cost per discrepant diagnosis (total cost/number discrepant) was $172.10.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that while very specific for infection, the sensitivity of intraoperative Gram staining is low, and agreement between positive cultures and Gram stains is very poor. Gram staining demonstrated limited cost-effectiveness because of the low prevalence of findings that altered patient management.

Preoperative and intraoperative infection workup in apparently aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty

The possibility of infection should be considered in every revision shoulder arthroplasty even in the absence of clinical symptoms and signs of infection because indolent infection is prevalent. Detection of infection in apparently aseptic failed arthroplasties poses a diagnostic challenge as the conventional principles and criteria used for hip and knee arthroplasty are not generally applicable. Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis are among the infectious organisms most commonly identified in such situations. Serum inflammatory markers are essential but are often unreliable as they have poor sensitivity in the shoulder. Preoperative shoulder joint aspiration culture is an important step but is subject to high false-negative rates. Lower cutoff values of synovial fluid analysis are used for detection of periprosthetic infection than for native joint infection as demonstrated in the knee literature. Intraoperatively, frozen section should be considered when a diagnosis of infection has not been established even in the presence of clinical suspicion. Gram stain is currently not recommended because of its low sensitivity and negative predictive value. Intraoperative culture is critical and should be performed whenever there is clinical suspicion of infection. Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures are not uncommon, and 6% to 25% of them appear to represent true infection as demonstrated with positive follow-up cultures or subsequent development of infection. In revision shoulder arthroplasty, determining the presence of infection can be difficult. A standardized approach is needed to determine the best course of treatment in this particular clinical setting.

Limitations of Gram staining for the diagnosis of infections following total hip or knee arthroplasty

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty is difficult for clinicians to make decisions due to the similar symptoms presented by aseptic loosening and infection. Gram staining (GS) is a widely used test but its value remains controversial due to conflicting results in the diagnosis of PJI. The aim of the present study was therefore to evaluate the value of GS in the diagnosis of PJI. Searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE and OVID databases were conducted for data published between January 1990 and December 2013. Meta-analysis was used to pool the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odd ratios (DORs), area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), positive-likelihood ratios (PLRs), negative-likelihood ratios (NLRs) and post-test probability. The heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted. A total of 18 studies, including a total of 4,647 patients, were selected for analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.19 and 1.00, respectively. The AUC, PLR and NLR were 0.89, 41.6 and 0.82, respectively. Subgroup analyses indicated that the sensitivity/specificity for total hip arthroplasty was 0.14/0.99, whereas that for total knee arthroplasty was 0.14/1.00. Synovial fluid best reflected accurate GS-based diagnoses, with the highest DOR of 242, whereas tissue had the highest AUC of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97). GS had a poor clinically acceptable diagnostic value for detecting PJI. These data do not support the routine use of GS, without additional proof of infection, for diagnosing PJI; instead, GS could be used as an adjuvant tool to support the results of other investigations.

Contributions of human tissue analysis to understanding the mechanisms of loosening and osteolysis in total hip replacement

Aseptic loosening and osteolysis are the most frequent late complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA) leading to revision of the prosthesis. This review aims to demonstrate how histopathological studies contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms of aseptic loosening/osteolysis development. Only studies analysing periprosthetic tissues retrieved from failed implants in humans were included. Data from 101 studies (5532 patients with failure of THA implants) published in English or German between 1974 and 2013 were included. "Control" samples were reported in 45 of the 101 studies. The most frequently examined tissues were the bone-implant interface membrane and pseudosynovial tissues. Histopathological studies contribute importantly to determination of key cell populations underlying the biological mechanisms of aseptic loosening and osteolysis. The studies demonstrated the key molecules of the host response at the protein level (chemokines, cytokines, nitric oxide metabolites, metalloproteinases). However, these studies also have important limitations. Tissues harvested at revision surgery reflect specifically end-stage failure and may not adequately reveal the evolution of pathophysiological events that lead to prosthetic loosening and osteolysis. One possible solution is to examine tissues harvested from stable total hip arthroplasties that have been revised at various time periods due to dislocation or periprosthetic fracture in multicenter studies.

[SECOT consensus on painful knee replacement]

The opinions of 21 experts in knee surgery were evaluated in this study, using a DELPHI questionnaire method in two successive rounds, on 64 controversial scenarios that covered both the diagnosis and possible treatment of painful knee replacements. The level of consensus was significantly unanimous in 42 items and of the design in 5, with no agreement in 17 of the questions presented. light of the published scientific evidence, the surgeons who took part showed to have a notable level of information on the most effective diagnostic tests, although, it should be pointed out that there was a lack of confidence in the possibility of ruling out an infection when the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein were within normal values, which have been demonstrated in the literature to have a high negative predictive value As regards the treatments to employ in the different situations, the responses of the expert panel were mainly in agreement with the data in the literature. The conclusions of this consensus may help other surgeons when they are faced with a painful knee prosthesis.

Usefulness of histology for predicting infection at the time of hip revision for the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures

When facing a Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture, the most recommended treatment is the prosthesis replacement. Current tests do not provide enough reliability to identify whether the fracture has been produced on a septic or an aseptic loosened prosthesis. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the histology for the diagnosis of infection in these cases. A total of 11 hip revision procedures were performed (mean age: 78.1 years, 8 women and 3 men). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the histology were 100%, 55.5%, 33.3% and 100% respectively. Of the six patients presenting with a positive histology, four of them had negative cultures (66.6% of false positives). Our results suggest that periprosthetic fractures are a cause of false-positive histology results for the diagnosis of infection during revision of a hip prosthesis for the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures.

How do frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnoses compare for staged revision after periprosthetic hip infections?

Histopathologic analysis of frozen tissue samples is used to aid the intraoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic hip infections, but there are concerns about reliability. The purposes of this study were to determine the rate of concordance between diagnoses of infection made with frozen and permanent sections and to assess how discrepancies affected patient outcomes. A total of 282 samples from 62 patients were collected for frozen and permanent section analysis. There was concordance in 274 samples (97%). In 1 case, discrepancies led to retention of components during persistent infection, and the patient required further revision and antibiotics until infection free. Otherwise, discrepancies did not affect patient outcomes. There is good concordance between frozen and permanent sections for diagnosing periprosthetic hip infection and rarely do these discrepancies affect management.

Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative Gram stains have a reported low sensitivity but high specificity when used to help diagnose periprosthetic infections. In early 2008, we recognized an unexpectedly high frequency of apparent false-positive Gram stains from revision arthroplasties.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this report is to describe the cause of these false-positive test results.

METHODS

We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of all intraoperative Gram stains submitted from revision arthroplasty cases during a 3-month interval using microbiologic cultures of the same samples as the gold standard. Methods of specimen harvesting, handling, transport, distribution, specimen processing including tissue grinding/macerating, Gram staining, and interpretation were studied. After a test modification, results of specimens were prospectively collected for a second 3-month interval, and the sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative Gram stains were calculated.

RESULTS

The retrospective review of 269 Gram stains submitted from revision arthroplasties indicated historic sensitivity and specificity values of 23% and 92%, respectively. Systematic analysis of all steps of the procedure identified Gram-stained but nonviable bacteria in commercial broth reagents used as diluents for maceration of periprosthetic membranes before Gram staining and culture. Polymerase chain reaction and sequencing showed mixed bacterial DNA. Evaluation of 390 specimens after initiating standardized Millipore filtering of diluent fluid revealed a reduced number of positive Gram stains, yielding 9% sensitivity and 99% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Clusters of false-positive Gram stains have been reported in other clinical conditions. They are apparently rare related to diagnosing periprosthetic infections but have severe consequences if used to guide treatment. Even occasional false-positive Gram stains should prompt review of laboratory methods. Our observations implicate dead bacteria in microbiologic reagents as potential sources of false-positive Gram stains.

Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee

No preferred test for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection exists, and the algorithm for the workup of patients suspected of infection remains unclear. The work group evaluated the available literature to determine the role of each diagnostic modality and devise a practical algorithm that allows physicians to reach diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Ten of the 15 recommendations have strong or moderate evidence in support. These include matters involving erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level testing, knee and hip aspiration, and stopping the use of antibiotics prior to obtaining intra-articular cultures. The group recommends against the use of intraoperative Gram stain but does recommend the use of frozen sections of peri-implant tissues in reoperation patients in whom infection has not been established, as well as multiple cultures in reoperation patients being assessed for infection. The group recommends against initiating antibiotic treatment in patients with suspected infection until after joint cultures have been obtained, but recommends that prophylactic preoperative antibiotics not be withheld in patients at lower probability for infection.

Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The preoperative diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection in patients with a total hip or knee arthroplasty may rely in part on the use of systemic inflammation markers. These markers have unclear accuracy. The objective of this review was to summarize the evidence on the accuracy of the peripheral white blood-cell count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein levels, and serum interleukin-6 levels for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) from 1950 through 2009. Eligible studies evaluated the accuracy of white blood-cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein level, and serum interleukin-6 level for the intraoperative diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection at the time of revision arthroplasty. Two reviewers working independently extracted study characteristics and data to estimate the diagnostic odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for each result.

RESULTS

We included thirty eligible studies that included 3909 revision total hip or knee arthroplasties. The prevalence of prosthetic joint infection was 32.5% (1270 of 3909). The accuracy of assessed inflammation markers, represented with a diagnostic odds ratio, was 314.7 (95% confidence interval, 113.0 to 876.8) for interleukin-6 (three studies), 13.1 (95% confidence interval, 7.9 to 21.7) for C-reactive protein level (twenty-three studies), 7.2 (95% confidence interval, 4.7 to 10.9) for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (twenty-five studies), and 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 2.9 to 6.6) for white blood-cell count (fifteen studies).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy for prosthetic joint infection was best for interleukin-6, followed by C-reactive protein level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and white blood-cell count. Given the limited numbers of studies assessing interleukin-6 levels, further investigations assessing the accuracy of interleukin-6 for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection are warranted.

Should gram stains have a role in diagnosing hip arthroplasty infections?

BACKGROUND

The utility of Gram stains in diagnosing periprosthetic infections following total hip arthroplasty has recently been questioned. Several studies report low sensitivity of the test, and its poor ability to either confirm or rule out infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Despite this, many institutions including that of the senior author continue to perform Gram stains during revision total hip arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of Gram stains from surgical-site samplings taken from procedures on patients with both infected and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasties.

METHODS

A review was performed on patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty between 2000 and 2007. Eighty-two Gram stains were performed on patients who had infected total hip arthroplasties and underwent revision procedures. Additionally, of the 410 revision total hip arthroplasties performed on patients who were confirmed infection-free, 120 Gram stains were performed. Patients were diagnosed as infected using multiple criteria at the time of surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated from these Gram stain results.

RESULTS

The Gram stain demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 9.8% and 100%, respectively. In this series, the Gram stain had a negative predictive value of 62%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and an accuracy of 63%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gram stains obtained from surgical-site samples had poor sensitivity and poor negative predictive value. Based on these findings, as well as those of other authors, we believe that Gram stains should no longer be considered for diagnosing infections in revision total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of septic complications following modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur

In a retrospective single-centre study 170 consecutive patients were included who received a Kotz modular prosthesis after resection of bone tumours of the proximal femur to evaluate the management of prosthetic infection. Infection occurred in 12 of 166 patients available for follow-up (six males; six females; mean age, 47 years; range, ten to 75 years) after a mean of 39 months (range, one to 166 months; infection rate, 7.2%). Mean follow-up was 54 months (range, four to 200 months). One patient died of septic shock. Two patients were treated by wound revision only. Treatment of infection in the remaining patients was one-stage revision in eight and hip disarticulation in one. Infection control by one-stage revision was achieved in five of eight patients; re-infection occurred in three patients and was successfully treated by further revision in all of them. The overall success rate for controlling infection was 83.3%.

Periprosthetic infection: where do we stand with regard to Gram stain?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

One of the routinely used intraoperative tests for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection (PPI) is the Gram stain. It is not known if the result of this test can vary according to the type of joint affected or the number of specimen samples collected. We examined the role of this diagnostic test in a large cohort of patients from a single institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A positive gram stain was defined as the visualization of bacterial cells or "many neutrophils" (> 5 per high-power field) in the smear. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of each individual diagnostic arm of Gram stain were determined. Combinations were performed in series, which required both tests to be positive to confirm infection, and also in parallel, which necessitated both tests to be negative to rule out infection.

RESULTS

The presence of organisms and "many" neutrophils on a Gram smear had high specificity (98-100%) and positive predictive value (89-100%) in both THA and TKA. The sensitivities (30-50%) and negative predictive values (70-79%) of the 2 tests were low for both joint types. When the 2 tests were combined in series, the specificity and positive predictive value were absolute (100%). The sensitivity and the negative predictive value improved for both THA and TKA (43-64% and 82%, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

Although the 2 diagnostic arms of Gram staining can be combined to achieve improved negative predictive value (82%), Gram stain continues to have little value in ruling out PPI. With the advances in the field of molecular biology, novel diagnostic modalities need to be designed that can replace these traditional and poor tests.

Evaluation and management of the infected total hip and knee

Infection should be in the differentia for any painful total hip or knee. A thorough history and physical, complete set of radiographs and appropriate labs including C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are essential in the initial evaluation. Ancillary tests such as aspiration and nuclear imaging may be helpful in unclear cases or when labs are concerning for infection. It is essential that all antibiotics are discontinued several weeks prior to gram stain and culture, if possible, to reduce the number of false negative test results. Classifying infection into acute versus late infection aids in the treatment plan. For acute infections presenting within 2 to 4 weeks of symptom onset, irrigation and debridement with polyethylene liner exchange and retention of components may be possible. When attempting component retention, thorough debridement and rapid treatment of the infection prior to the accumulation of any biofilm is paramount for a successful outcome. Other important prognostic factors to consider include the virulence of the microorganism as well as the immune status of the host. Despite expeditious management, irrigation and debridement of acute total hip and knee infections frequently leads to recurrent infection. Thus, patients should be counseled accordingly. Further management may be needed following an initial attempt at component retention. These options include resection arthroplasty with or without re-implantation, long term antibiotic suppressive therapy, arthrodesis and even above the knee amputation in rare circumstances. For chronic infections, a successful outcome depends on several factors including the baseline health status of the patient, implant removal with a thorough debridement followed by culture specific antibiotic treatment. Furthermore, methods of monitoring for persistent infection include following laboratory values such as the C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and cultures from joint aspirations. Whether to perform a direct exchange versus a delayed revision arthroplasty for chronic total hip and knee infections can be debated. Several published series have reported successful outcomes with single stage procedures when patients are carefully selected. However, the majority of chronic infections in the United States are treated with two stage resection, since this method has consistently provided the highest cure rates, with many current studies demonstrating >90% success.

Tissue concentrations of vancomycin and Moxifloxacin in periprosthetic infection in rats

BACKGROUND

A one-step exchange of an endoprosthesis with periprosthetic infection requires effective antibiotics at high concentrations around the endoprosthesis. We evaluated the tissue distribution of vancomycin and Moxifloxacin in a standardized in vivo model of periprosthetic infection.

METHODS

36 male rats with periprosthetic infection of the left hind leg, induced by a standardized procedure, received either antibiotic treatment with vancomycin or Moxifloxacin twice daily for 2 weeks, or a sham treatment. After the last administration, different tissues from each animal were evaluated for concentrations of antibiotic.

RESULTS

Compared to plasma, the tissue concentrations of Moxifloxacin were higher in all tissues investigated (lung, muscle, fat, bone) and the tissue-plasma ratio of Moxifloxacin was considerably higher than that of vancomycin. The concentrations of Moxifloxacin were equally high in the infected and the uninfected hind leg, whereas the vancomycin concentrations were significantly higher in the infected leg.

INTERPRETATION

The standardized model of periprosthetic infection described here can be extrapolated to different bacterial and mycotic pathogens, and also to different antibiotics or therapeutic regimes. It provides a way of correlating tissue concentrations with clinical outcome in future studies.

The Mark Coventry Award: white blood cell gene expression: a new approach toward the study and diagnosis of infection

We introduce a new genomic approach toward the study and diagnosis of infection. Our purpose is to show that synovial fluid white blood cells express a gene expression "signature" that differentiates septic from aseptic inflammation. Synovial fluid was aspirated from patients with acute Staphylococcus aureus infections or acute gout of the knee. Differential cell counts included predominantly neutrophils in all aspirates. Ribonucleic acid was isolated from the synovial-fluid white blood cells and was analyzed on the Affymetrix U133A GeneChip. The neutrophils from a patient whose knee is infected with Staphylococcus aureus can be distinguished from the neutrophils found in gout by nature of their differential gene expression. There are 1615 genes that have an expression level that is significantly different between the groups. The 124 most significant differences are in genes from immune pathways including the interleukin pathway, the tumor necrosis factor pathway, and the antibacterial response. The neutrophils at a site of infection (Staphylococcus aureus) express different genes than the neutrophils at a site of aseptic inflammation (gout). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo demonstration of this principle. The differences in neutrophil gene expression may be used to develop simple laboratory tests that distinguish the causes of inflammation in a total joint arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II-1. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: current techniques and emerging technologies

It is important to diagnose prosthetic joint infection accurately because the medical and surgical treatment of prosthetic joint infection differs from that of other causes of prosthetic joint failure. Recognition of the presence or absence of infection at or before the time of surgery is important in directing the appropriate surgical approach. Recovery and susceptibility testing of the infecting organism are essential to the selection of appropriate anti-infective therapy.

The role of intraoperative frozen section in decision making in revision hip and knee arthroplasties in a local community hospital

There is little information in the literature regarding the reliability of intraoperative frozen section to predict infection in revision arthroplasties performed in community hospitals as most reports are from specialized centers or academic institutes. Between November 1997 and May 2001, we performed intraoperative frozen sections in 40 revision hip and knee arthroplasties. We used Mirra's criteria of more than 5 polymorphs per high power field to constitute a positive result. We found a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 97%. The positive and negative predictive values were 86% and 91%, respectively, with an accuracy of 90%. We conclude that intraoperative frozen section is a reasonably sensitive and specific adjunct investigation in the differentiation between septic and aseptic loosening.

Periprosthetic sepsis

The diagnosis of septic implant failure can be difficult to make, yet is imperative for optimal patient outcomes in revision total hip arthroplasty. In most cases, a thorough history and physical examination combined with preoperative laboratory tests and an intraoperative frozen section are sufficient to differentiate septic from aseptic failure. If preoperative laboratory test values are elevated, preoperative aspiration of the hip can be used in selected patients to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of infection. Nuclear medicine studies comprise a second-line investigation to evaluate patients with a painful total hip arthroplasty in whom revision surgery otherwise is not indicated. Intraoperative tissue appearance in combination with intraoperative Gram stains are unreliable for detecting periprosthetic sepsis, and neither is adequate when considered alone for ruling out infection at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty. It is imperative that the surgeon doing revision total hip arthroplasty thoroughly understands the relative utility of preoperative and intraoperative tests used to diagnose periprosthetic sepsis.

Molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection

The majority of patients with prosthetic joint replacement (arthroplasty) experience dramatic relief of pain and restoration of satisfactory joint function. In the United States, more than.5 million people have a primary arthroplasty each year. Less than 10% of prosthesis recipients have complications develop during their lifetime, commonly as a result of aseptic biomechanical failure, followed by prosthetic joint infection. The pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infection is related to bacteria in biofilms, in which they are protected from antimicrobial killing and host responses rendering these infections difficult to eradicate. Current microbiology laboratory methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection depend on isolation of a pathogen by culture. However, these methods have neither ideal sensitivity nor ideal specificity. Therefore, culture-independent molecular methods have been used to improve the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. In the research setting, detection of 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid by polymerase chain reaction has been used in the molecular diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Various antibiofilm strategies directed at disruption of adherent bacteria are the focus of intense research to improve the detection of biofilm organisms and their eradication. In this article, molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection are reviewed.

Microbiology of liver abscesses and the predictive value of abscess gram stain and associated blood cultures

Although rare, pyogenic liver abscesses are potentially fatal. We evaluated the predictive value of Gram stain of liver abscess aspirates and temporally associated blood cultures. Gram stains detected bacteria in 79% of the liver abscesses tested. The sensitivity and specificity of Gram stain of the liver abscesses were 90% and 100% for Gram-positive cocci (GPC) and 52% and 94% for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). The sensitivities of the blood cultures for any GPC and GNB present in the liver abscess were 30% and 39%, respectively. Although, Gram stains and blood cultures offer incomplete detection of the microbial contents of pyogenic liver abscesses, both tests should always accompany liver abscess cultures.