Perioperative X-rays in arthroplasty surgery: outcome and cost

Formal Radiologist Interpretations of Intraoperative Spine Radiographs Have Low Clinical Value

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical relevance, usefulness, and financial implications of intraoperative radiograph interpretation by radiologists in spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Due to rising health care costs, spine surgery is under scrutiny to maximize value-based care. Formal radiographic analysis remains a potential source of unnecessary health care costs, especially for intraoperative radiographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on all adult elective spine surgeries at a single institution between July 2020 and July 2021. Demographic and radiographic data were collected, including intraoperative localization and post-instrumentation radiographs. Financial data were obtained through the institution's price estimator. Radiographic characteristics included time from radiographic imaging to completion of radiologist interpretation report, completion of radiologist interpretation report before the conclusion of surgical procedure, clinical relevance, and clinical usefulness. Reports were considered clinically relevant if the spinal level of the procedure was described and clinically useful if completed before the conclusion of the procedure and deemed clinically relevant.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-one intraoperative localization and post-instrumentation radiographs from 360 patients revealed a median delay of 128 minutes between imaging and completion of the interpretive report. Only 38.9% of reports were completed before the conclusion of surgery. There were 79.4% deemed clinically relevant and only 33.5% were clinically useful. Localization reports were completed more frequently before the conclusion of surgery (67.2% vs. 34.4%) but with lower clinical relevance (90.1% vs. 98.5%) and clinical usefulness (60.3% vs. 33.6%) than post-instrumentation reports. Each patient was charged $32 to $34 for the interpretation fee, cumulating a minimum total cost of $15,392.

CONCLUSIONS

Formal radiographic interpretation of intraoperative spine radiographs was of low clinical utility for spine surgeons. Institutions should consider optimizing radiology workflows to improve timeliness and clinical relevance or evaluate the necessity of reflexive consultation to radiology for intraoperative imaging interpretation to ensure that value-based care is maximized during spine surgeries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Is Immediate Postoperative Radiograph Necessary Following Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The necessity of immediate postoperative radiographs following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has long been debated. With the increasing use of robotic-assisted TKA (RTKA), and thus more precise implant placement, the need for immediate postoperative radiographs to determine implant positioning may be unnecessary. We sought to evaluate implant position on the immediate postoperative radiographs following RTKA to determine their necessity. A retrospective review of 150 RTKAs was performed. The posterior slopes for all TKAs were recorded based on the preoperative three-dimensional template. Additionally, two independent trained researchers (J.G./L.B.) each measured the posterior slope of the postoperative day 0 (POD0) radiograph and postoperative week 2 radiograph. The difference in posterior slope measurement between template and POD0, between template and postoperative week 2, and between POD0 and postoperative week 2 was calculated. Of the 150 TKAs performed, there were no periprosthetic fractures found on the POD0 radiograph. The mean difference between the templated posterior slope and measured posterior slope on POD0 was 0.04 degrees (standard deviation [SD], 1.01; p = 0.615). There was a weak correlation between the two values (rs [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.38 [0.21, 0.53]). When comparing the template to the postoperative week 2 radiographs, there was a mean difference of 0.02 degrees (SD, 0.48; p = 0.556).  However, a moderate to strong correlation was noted (rs [95% CI], 0.71 [0.61, 0.79]). Comparison of the mean posterior slope from POD0 radiograph to that of postoperative week 2 radiograph showed a mean difference of 0.06 degrees (SD, 1.0; p = 0.427). A weak correlation was found between these two values (rs [95% CI], 0.43 [0.26, 0.56]). Given the accuracy and precision of RTKA, along with the ability to decrease cost and radiation, immediate postoperative radiograph may be unnecessary, when pertaining to the uncomplicated RTKA. However, if there is concern for intraoperative fracture, long stems placed in a revision arthroplasty, or other intraoperative complications, then postoperative radiographs are encouraged.

Demand Matching Total Joint Replacement Patients Results in Reduction of Post-Discharge Costs

BACKGROUND

The shift from fee-for-service to value-based care has focused payers and providers on resource utilization. One important component of value-based care is to reduce the use of post-discharge (PD) services in a clinically appropriate manner following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Demand matching in healthcare is the process of tailoring appropriate medical care to a patient with respect to that patient's specific medical needs and social determinants. Outcomes following the implementation of a demand-matching algorithm for coordinating PD services after TJA were analyzed in this study.

METHODS

Payment data from all Medicare patients undergoing primary unilateral TJA between July 2014 and December 2018 from a single orthopedic practice were included. These payments were separated into acute and PD care. The initial acute and PD costs were compared to costs at the end of the 4-year study period using multiple linear regression and chi-square.

RESULTS

A total of 9,638 patients (4,212 total hip arthroplasties and 5,430 total knee arthroplasties) were included. Acute costs of TJA were stable averaging $13,712.00. PD costs fell steadily from a baseline average of $7,319.00 in July 2014 to $4,678.00 in December 2018 (P < .001), representing a 36.1% decline. Discharge to home increased steadily from 45.8% to 79.9% during the same interval (P < .001.) CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in PD costs over a 4-year period using a demand-matching strategy to align with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mandate for value-based care. Based on these data, we conclude that thoughtful preoperative assessment of patient factors such as social determinants and medical comorbidities could allow for cost reduction through better utilization of PD services.

Radiologist Overreads of Intraoperative Radiographs-Value or Waste?

BACKGROUND

All aspects of the arthroplasty pathway must be scrutinized to maximize value and eliminate unnecessary cost. Radiology providers' contracts with hospitals often call for readings of all radiographs. This policy has little effect on patient care when intraoperative radiographs are taken and used to make real-time decisions. In order to determine the value of radiologist overreads, we asked 3 questions: what was the delay between the time an intraoperative radiograph was taken and time the report was generated, were the overreads accurate, and what is the associated cost?

METHODS

Two hundred hip and knee radiograph reports generated over 6 months during 391 cases were reviewed. The time the report was dictated was compared to the time taken and time of surgery completion. To determine accuracy, each overread was rated as accurate or inaccurate. The cost of the overread was determined by multiplying the number of radiographs times the radiology fee less the technical fee.

RESULTS

Median delay between taking the radiograph and filing the report was 45 minutes (range, 0-9778 minutes). Only 31.5% were filed before completion of the procedure. And 18.0% (36/200) were considered inaccurate despite lenient criteria. The reading fee for hip radiographs was $52.00, and for knee radiographs was $38.00, representing a total cost of $10,182 in our select series. This cost projects to $43,614 annually at our facility.

CONCLUSION

Radiology overreads of intraoperative radiographs have no effect on real-time decision-making. In the era of value-based care, payors should stop paying for overreads and reimburse providers who actually read the films intraoperatively.

CT planning studies for robotic total knee arthroplasty

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze the true costs associated with preoperative CT scans performed for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) planning and to determine the value of a formal radiologist’s report of these studies.

Methods

We reviewed 194 CT reports of 176 sequential patients who underwent primary RATKA by a single surgeon at a suburban teaching hospital. CT radiology reports were reviewed for the presence of incidental findings that might change the management of the patient. Payments for the scans, including the technical and professional components, for 330 patients at two hospitals were also recorded and compared.

Results

There were 82 incidental findings in 61 CT studies, one of which led to a recommendation for additional testing. Across both institutions, the mean total payment for a preoperative scan was $446 ($8 to $3,870). The mean patient payment was $71 ($0 to $2,690). There was wide variation in payments between the institutions. In Institution A, the mean total payment was $258 ($168 to $264), with a mean patient payment of $57 ($0 to $100). The mean technical payment in this institution was $211 ($8 to $856), while the mean professional payment was $48 ($0 to $66). In Institution B, the mean total payment was $636 ($37 to $3,870), with a mean patient payment of $85 ($0 to $2,690).

Conclusion

The total cost of a CT scan is low and a minimal part of the overall cost of the RATKA. No incidental findings identified on imaging led to a change in management, suggesting that the professional component could be eliminated to reduce costs. Further studies need to take into account the patient perspective and the wide variation in total costs and patient payments across institutions and insurances. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):79–84.

Immediate Postoperative Portable Radiograph After Total Knee Replacements: A Necessity or a Burden?

Background:

Total Knee Replacement (TKR) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic surgery(1). Immediate postoperative portable radiographs are performed after primary TKR in order to identify any potential complications and technical flaws. It also serves as a reference for comparison with subsequent radiographs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economical value of these radiographs in TKR. It compares the quality of the portable radiograph, taken immediately post-operation, with in-suite radiographs taken 5-7 weeks post-operation

Methods:

In this retrospective study, a consecutive series of 389 TKR patients from January-2011 to March-2015 were reviewed. Radiological evaluation consisted of assessing the beam angle and the exposure on the images. Implant positioning was also compared by measuring the anatomical axis to look for component alignment discrepancies.

Results:

The quality of the portable recovery room radiograph was overall inferior to the radiology suite radiograph regarding both beam angle and exposure. Component alignment discrepancies were also identified in the angle measurements between both types of radiographs.

Conclusion:

Therefore, our study demonstrated that there is no clinical or financial value obtained from postoperative portable radiograph. Furthermore, Immediate recovery room radiographs should be avoided from being performed routinely and may only be used in cases where the surgeon is utilizing a new implant or technique. No external funding was provided for this study from any source.

The Utility of Postoperative Radiographs 2 Years After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Radiographs are routinely used to evaluate patients postoperatively after total knee arthroplasty, but no evidence-based guidelines exist regarding their use. The purpose of this study is to quantify the use of radiographs within 2 years of primary total knee arthroplasty by one surgeon and to determine if routine studies in asymptomatic patients altered patient management.

METHODS

Patients undergoing consecutive primary total knee arthroplasties between 2008 and 2010 were identified. Patients undergoing revision or additional simultaneous procedures or those with less than 6 months of radiographic follow-up were excluded. Operative and clinic notes, radiographs, and radiology reports were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients were identified; each patient had an average of 13.5 ± 3.8 individual radiographs obtained in 6.5 ± 1.7 series. Twelve radiographic series were noted to have abnormal findings by either the attending surgeon or by radiology report. Three of these patients underwent reoperation directly related to the findings; 2 for deep infections and 1 for extensor mechanism disruption. All 3 patients had reported abnormal symptoms when their films were obtained. The remaining 9 abnormal radiographic findings included focal lucencies or osteolysis, asymmetric spacer wear, a healing stress fracture, an inferior patellar avulsion fracture, and heterotopic ossification. No patient had symptoms attributable to these findings when the radiographs were obtained, and in no case was the management altered based on these finding.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the observed frequency of routine postoperative radiographs in asymptomatic patients may not be necessary in the first 2 years after primary total knee arthroplasty.

A multimodal approach in total hip arthroplasty preoperative templating

OBJECTIVES

Accurate preoperative planning is mandatory for a successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Templating helps to achieve multiple technical goals, including offset restoration, leg-length equality, and components positioning. This study aims to measure how successful a new stepwise method for preoperative radiographic templating is in achieving postoperative restoration of anatomy.

METHODS

We measured the relationship of several radiographic landmarks on the affected limb in comparison to the unaffected limb to define the appropriate position of the components. One hundred consecutive patients with unilateral disease undergoing THA were retrospectively analyzed. The preoperative templates were compared with the postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

Accuracy in achieving the desired offset, leg-length discrepancy within 5 mm, was 93 % and 100 % respectively. Acetabular component positioning within 2° was replicated in 92 %.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that this technique can help the surgeon to accurately reproduce the anatomy of the contralateral unaffected hip.

Postdischarge costs in arthroplasty surgery

Postdischarge costs associated with primary arthroplasty surgeries have received limited attention in the literature. Our objective was to identify the costs incurred after discharge in primary arthroplasty and to estimate annual postdischarge expenditures in the United States. A cohort of 136 patients who underwent primary arthroplasty was studied. Comprehensive rehabilitation unit (CRU) and home care (HC) costs were obtained. The National Hospital Discharge Survey 2003 data were used to model the national discharge cost estimates. Local patient-oriented outcome was also compared in the patients discharged to CRU vs HC. Total costs were significantly lower in patients discharged directly to home vs those sent to the CRU and who subsequently received HC ($2405 vs $13435, P < .001); both patient groups experienced similar quality of life improvements. An estimated $3.2 billion is spent annually on postsurgical rehabilitation after arthroplasty. Postdischarge costs are significantly higher for patients going to a CRU vs those discharged home; yet, both groups had comparable short-term outcomes.

Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: analysis and review of the literature

We performed a bibliographic search of MEDLINE databases from January 1966 to July 2002 to identify English language articles that contained either "cost" or "economic" in combination with "total hip arthroplasty" (THA) in the abstract or title. Each study was then critically reviewed for content, technique, and adherence to established healthcare economic principles. Only 81 of the 153 studies retrieved contained actual economic data. Only 6% of studies adhered to established criteria for a comprehensive health care economic analysis. Although the number of publications regarding economic evaluation of THA is on the rise, the methodologic quality of many of these studies remains inadequate. Future studies should employ sound healthcare economic techniques to properly evaluate and assess the true social and economic value of THA.

Preoperative assessment

Although anaesthetic and surgical procedures should be individualised for every patient, in practice many preoperative protocols and routines are used generally. In this article, we aim to emphasise: why preoperative assessment is important; how it should be done, and by whom; what can be expected; and the importance of test selection based on patients' needs and on scientific evidence of effectiveness. We outline the roles of preoperative medical assessment in otherwise healthy patients. Clinical history, preoperative questionnaires, physical examination, routine tests, individual risk-assessment, and fasting policies are investigated by review of published work. Cost of routine preoperative assessment, the anaesthetist's legal responsibility, and patients'views in the preoperative process are also considered. A thorough clinical preoperative assessment of the patient is more important than routine preoperative tests, which should be requested only when justified by clinical indications. Moreover, this practice eliminates unnecessary cost without compromising the safety and quality of care. Education and training of medical doctors should be more scientifically guided, emphasising the relevance of effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness in clinical decision-making and complemented by audit.

Data management for a perioperative medicine practice

This article provides an overview of the possible uses of information technology to support a perioperative medicine service and describes the required investment for various solutions and the current issues confronted by the application of information technology in a health care environment. The extent to which a perioperative medicine practice requires information technology support for data management varies widely with the goals of the practice. The informational goals may range from the simple tracking of sentinel event rates or outcomes, such as ICU admission rates or hospital length of stay, to using a complete electronic medical record encompassing all aspects of patient care. Because the human and financial resource demand is orders of magnitude between these two extreme solutions, an honest assessment of the informational requirements and the available information technology support is a critical first step.

Single Price/Case Price Purchasing in orthopaedic surgery: experience at the Lahey Clinic

BACKGROUND

Hospital revenues for orthopaedic operations are not keeping pace with inflation or with rising hospital expenses. In an attempt to reduce the hospital cost of orthopaedic operations by reducing the cost of operating-room supplies, we developed a Single Price/Case Price Purchasing Program for implants used in total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty as well as for arthroscopic shavers and burrs, interference screws, and bone-suture anchors.

METHODS

The Lahey Clinic asked orthopaedic vendors to supply all instruments, implants, and disposable items related to these selected products for one single price per unit or case. For example, a single price for total hip arthroplasty implants included instruments, acetabular cups, acetabular liners, acetabular screws, femoral stems, femoral heads, and stem centralizers, if required. The hospital implemented the Single Price/ Case Price Purchasing Program with a competitive-bid request for proposal. Surgeons evaluated the responses to the bidding process, and they made final decisions on product selection.

RESULTS

The Single Price/Case Price Purchasing Program at the Lahey Clinic was successful in reducing the cost of orthopaedic implants and supplies. In the present article, we could not disclose the specific prices that we agreed to pay our vendors. The specific cost reductions were 32 percent for hip implants with a change of vendor, 23 percent for knee implants without a change of vendor, 25 percent for shoulder implants with a change of vendor, 45 percent for arthroscopic shavers and burrs without a change of vendor, 45 percent for interference screws without a change of vendor, and 23 percent for bone-suture anchors without a change of vendor.

CONCLUSIONS

The Single Price/Case Price Purchasing Program at the Lahey Clinic allowed the hospital to reduce its cost of orthopaedic operations by lowering the cost of operating-room supplies. This cost reduction is important in a health-care economy in which hospital revenues per unit of service or care are decreasing.