Identification of suicide risk among rural youth: implications for the use of HEADSS.
J Pediatr Health Care 2010;
24:152-67. [PMID:
20417887 PMCID:
PMC2863017 DOI:
10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.03.003]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2008] [Revised: 02/13/2009] [Accepted: 03/07/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Nurse practitioners have the power to assess psychosocial risk and detect and prevent suicide, a problem plaguing rural areas of the United States. Suicide risk assessment can be completed using the Home, Education, Activities, Drug use and abuse, Sexual behavior, and Suicidality and depression (HEADSS) interview instrument. The purpose of this study was to determine if HEADSS is appropriate for guiding suicide risk assessment of rural adolescents.
METHOD
High school students in Southwestern Pennsylvania completed qualitative questions from the Child Behavior Checklist and Coping Response Inventory as part of the Intervention to Promote Mental Health in Rural Youth. Qualitative content analysis was performed.
RESULTS
Prominent themes identified by participants included academic performance, relationships, dislikes about school, friends, death, mental health, and the future. Several minor themes concerned safety. Most known risk factors for suicide were concerns of participants.
DISCUSSION
The expansion of HEADSS to include death and safety should be considered. The modified version-HEADDSSS-can be used to guide suicide risk assessment of youth in rural Pennsylvania, ensuring both thoroughness of assessment and safety.
Collapse