Outcome of corneal and laser astigmatic axis alignment in photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy

Correction of Astigmatism With SMILE With Axis Alignment: 6-Month Results From 622 Eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes in myopic eyes with astigmatism that underwent femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery with axis alignment.

METHODS

Overall, 622 eyes from 353 patients with myopia and astigmatism greater than -0.75 diopters (D) who had SMILE were included in this prospective study. Standard examinations were performed and visual acuity and vector astigmatism values were analyzed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.11 ± 1.68 D (range: -0.50 to -11.25 D) and manifest refractive cylinder was -1.60 ± 0.65 D (range: -0.75 to -6.25 D). In 622 enrolled eyes with astigmatism, 29.9% did not require rotation modification during surgery, and the average rotation degree (absolute) was 2.82° ± 1.44° (range: 0° to 10°). By 6 months after SMILE, all eyes showed improved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA); approximately 96.8% of eyes with astigmatism achieved the same or better UDVA postoperatively compared to the preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Moreover, the cylinder of all eyes was within ±1.00 D, and 97% of eyes were within ±0.50 D. Only 47 eyes exhibited a low degree of astigmatism (range: -0.75 to 0.50 D). In patients with high astigmatism (>-3.00 D), the preoperative CDVA was -0.02 ± 0.11 logMAR and the 6-month postoperative UDVA was -0.01 ± 0.16 logMAR (n = 24, P > .05), further implying the effectiveness of modified SMILE for refractive correction in patients with astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE with axis alignment provides efficient, predictable, and safe refractive correction in patients with myopic astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(3):138-145.].

Effect of limbal marking prior to laser ablation on the magnitude of cyclotorsional error

PURPOSE

To evaluate the residual registration error after limbal-marking-based manual adjustment in cyclotorsional tracker-controlled laser refractive surgery.

METHODS

Two hundred eyes undergoing custom surface ablation with the iVIS Suite (iVIS Technologies) were divided into limbal marked (marked) and non-limbal marked (unmarked) groups. Iris registration information was acquired preoperatively from all eyes. Preoperatively, the horizontal axis was recorded in the marked group for use in manual cyclotorsional alignment prior to surgical iris registration. During iris registration, the preoperative iris information was compared to the eye-tracker captured image. The magnitudes of the registration error angle and cyclotorsional movement during the subsequent laser ablation were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean magnitude of registration error angle (absolute value) was 1.82°±1.31° (range: 0.00° to 5.50°) and 2.90°±2.40° (range: 0.00° to 13.50°) for the marked and unmarked groups, respectively (P<.001). Mean magnitude of cyclotorsional movement during the laser ablation (absolute value) was 1.15°±1.34° (range: 0.00° to 7.00°) and 0.68°±0.97° (range: 0.00° to 6.00°) for the marked and unmarked groups, respectively (P=.005). Forty-six percent and 60% of eyes had registration error >2°, whereas 22% and 20% of eyes had cyclotorsional movement during ablation >2° in the marked and unmarked groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Limbal-marking-based manual alignment prior to laser ablation significantly reduced cyclotorsional registration error. However, residual registration misalignment and cyclotorsional movements remained during ablation.

Corneal limbal marking in the treatment of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser

PURPOSE

To determine whether preoperative marking of the limbal cornea improves treatment of myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser.

METHODS

Retrospective study on 108 eyes with myopic astigmatism that underwent LASIK or laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) with the Technolas 217 (Bausch & Lomb) excimer laser. Preoperative limbal marking was performed in 47 eyes (marked group). The 12-month results were used for refractive and visual analysis.

RESULTS

The achieved cylinder reduction, spherical reduction, and refractive predictability were similar for the marked and unmarked groups in the overall study collective, in the LASIK and LASEK subgroup analysis, and in a higher astigmatism (> 1.25 diopters) subgroup analysis. Limbal marking showed no influence on the refractive results, and vector analysis showed no significant difference in angle of error among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal limbal marking failed to improve the refractive outcome in LASIK and LASEK for myopic astigmatism.

Zyklorotation des Auges bei wellenfrontgeführter LASIK mit statischem Iriserkennungstracker

PURPOSE

Centration of the ablation zone decisively influences the result of wavefront-guided LASIK. Cyclorotation of the eye occurs as the patient changes from the sitting position during aberrometry to the supine position during laser surgery and may lead to induction of lower and higher order aberrations.

METHODS

Twenty patients (40 eyes) underwent wavefront-guided LASIK (B&L 217z 100 excimer laser) with a static eyetracker driven by iris recognition (mean preoperative SE: -4.72+/-1.45 D; range: -1.63 to -7.00 D). The iris patterns of the patients' eyes were memorized during aberrometry and after flap creation.

RESULTS

The mean absolute value of the measured cyclorotation was -1.5+/-4.2 degrees (range: -11.0 to 6.9 degrees ). The mean cyclorotation was 3.5+/-2.7 masculine (range: 0.1 to 11.0 degrees ). In 65% of all eyes cyclorotation was >2 masculine.

CONCLUSIONS

A static eyetracker driven by iris recognition demonstrated that cyclorotation of up to 11 degrees may occur in myopic and myopic astigmatic eyes when changing from a sitting to a supine position. Use of static eyetrackers with iris recognition may provide a more precise positioning of the ablation profile as they detect and compensate cyclorotation.

A Comparison of Induced Astigmatism in Conventional and Wavefront-guided Myopic LASIK Using LADARVision4000 and VISX S4 Platforms

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the surgically induced astigmatism in myopic eyes undergoing conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the charts of 200 myopic eyes of 121 patients who underwent either custom or conventional treatments via the VISX S4 or LADARVision4000 platforms (50 consecutive eyes in each of the four groups). The primary outcome measure was manifest refraction, which was evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The magnitude and axis of the unintended surgically induced astigmatism were calculated using vector analysis. The Student t test was used to compare the magnitudes of the surgically induced astigmatism and the absolute angle of error.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative manifest cylinder was 0.66 +/- 0.38 diopters (D) for conventional VISX S4 and 0.68 +/- 0.39 D for VISX CustomVue (P = .795), and 0.76 +/- 0.56 D for LADARVision and 0.61 +/- 0.36 D for LADAR CustomCornea (P = .114). The success index was 0.19 +/- 0.41 for VISX S4 and 0.49 +/- 0.49 for VISX CustomVue (P = .0013), and 0.25 +/- 0.47 for LADARVision and 0.20 +/- 0.39 for LADAR CustomCornea (P = .5721). The absolute mean angle of error was 4.4 +/- 13.9 degrees for VISX S4 versus 14.9 +/- 23.9 degrees for VISX CustomVue (P = .0085), and 6.1 +/- 12.30 for LADARVision versus 3.9 +/- 11.1 degrees for LADAR CustomCornea (P = .3501). Of the VISX CustomVue eyes, 32% had an absolute angle of error > 10 degrees, as compared to 10% for both the VISX S4 and LADAR CustomCornea eyes (P = .013), and 16% for the LADARVision group (P = .056).

CONCLUSIONS

Wavefront-guided ablation is associated with higher surgically induced astigmatism and larger astigmatic axis shift on the VISX platform as compared to the LADAR CustomCornea and the LADAR and VISX conventional platforms. Care should be emphasized mainly during registration/alignment to minimize surgically induced astigmatism in wavefront-guided LASIK.

Comparison of two techniques of marking the horizontal axis during excimer laser keratorefractive surgery for myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare two methods of limbal marking used during laser refractive surgery for myopic astigmatism.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Forty-two eyes of 42 patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic astigmatism were marked preoperatively to identify the horizontal axis. In 18 eyes, marks were placed at the slit lamp (SL) with the slit beam set at 180 degrees as a reference. In 24 eyes, marks were placed in the laser room (LR) immediately before reclining under the laser. All treatments were performed with the Alcon LADARVision excimer laser system. Vector analysis of postoperative cylinder and reduction in cylinder and uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated for both groups.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative magnitude of error was -0.19 +/- 0.44 diopters for the LR group and -0.09 +/- 0.42 diopters for the SL group (P = .439, NS). Both groups had a mean angle of error indicating an overall counterclockwise rotation of axis with an angle of error of 6.3 +/- 8.7 degrees for the LR group and 8.0 +/- 10.2 degrees for the SL group (P = .562, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in outcomes with an overall trend toward undercorrection of cylinder in both groups, leaving room for improvement after refractive surgery for myopic astigmatism.

Rotational malposition during laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To investigate the degree of rotational malposition in eyes undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

We measured the rotational position of 240 eyes of 169 patients who underwent treatment for myopic or hyperopic astigmatism with the Alcon Summit Autonomous (Orlando, Florida) LADARVision excimer laser. Immediately preoperatively, each eye was marked while the patient was seated upright. Rotational position was measured on the supine patient immediately before beginning the laser exposure.

RESULTS

For all 240 eyes, mean +/- standard deviation (SD) torsional misalignment was 4.1 +/- 3.7 degrees (right eye 3.8 +/- 3.7 degrees, left eye 4.2 +/- 3.6 degrees). A total of 20 eyes (8%) had a deviation of greater than 10 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

A 4 degree and 10 degree misalignment would theoretically result in a 14% and 35% undercorrection of astigmatism, respectively. Preoperative marking of the upright patient and subsequent rotational alignment of the supine patient before laser treatment may reduce the error in correction of astigmatism during excimer laser vision correction surgery.