Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery

International Multicenter, Myopic and Myopic Astigmatism Femto LASIK, Customized by Automated Ray-Tracing Ablation Profile Calculation: A Postmarket Study

Purpose

To assess the safety and efficacy of a customized ablation treatment (InnovEyes) to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism with femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto LASIK).

Patients and Methods

In this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study, 113 patients (225 eyes) with preoperative myopia less than -9.0 diopters (D) and astigmatism 0 to -4.0 D (based on InnovEyes refraction) underwent wavefront, tomography, and biometry assessment using a single diagnostic device (InnovEyes sightmap). These data were imported and used unmodified by the InnovEyes algorithm to automatically calculate and optimize correction of lower- and higher‑order aberrations (HOAs) treated by the EX500 ablation profile. Visual acuity, refractive error, HOAs, and patient satisfaction were evaluated over 3 months.

Results

A total of 106 patients (212 eyes) completed the study and were included in the analysis. Mean preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -3.38±1.76 D. At Month 3, uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 208/212 (98.1%) eyes, and it was the same as, or better than, the preoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in 162/212 (76.4%) eyes; 76/212 (35.8%) eyes gained ≥1 line of CDVA. MRSE was within ±0.5 D in 195/212 (92.0%) eyes. Additionally, 201/209 (96.2%) eyes had no change (defined as a change between -0.1 μm and 0.1 μm, inclusive) in HOAs, and 105/106 (99.1%) patients reported to be satisfied with the results.

Conclusion

Customizing ray-tracing Femto LASIK with this platform appeared safe and effective in correcting myopic astigmatism and also achieved a significant percentage of eyes gaining lines of vision, potentially by addressing HOAs, along with a consistently high level of patient satisfaction.

Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare objective refractive errors and keratometry measurements obtained using the Nidek OPD-Scan II aberrometer/topographer and Topcon KR 8900 autorefractokeratometer.

METHODS

The right eye medical records of 176 patients aged 18-35 years who were admitted to our clinic as refractive surgery candidates were tested for refractive status and keratometry measurements with a Nidek OPD-Scan II aberrometer/topographer and a standard table-top autorefractokeratometer (Topcon KR 8900) before and after the induction of cycloplegia. Patients who had undergone any eye surgery and had hereditary, ectatic, or acquired corneal pathology were excluded. Refractive data were compared as spheres, cylinders, spherical equivalents, and power vectors before and after the induction of cycloplegia. Flat and steep keratometry (K1-K2) readings were recorded in diopters (D) and axis degrees, respectively, for each eye.

RESULTS

The spherical, cylindrical, spherical equivalence, J0-J45 vector values and K1-K2 readings (D, axis) between the two devices were statistically significant before and after the induction of cycloplegia (p<0.05). Bland-Altman analysis identified mean differences (95%CI of limits of agreement) of 0.77 (-0,57 to 2,11) in sphere, 0.74 (-0,54 to 2,01) in spherical equivalent, -0,07 (-0,41 to 0,26) in J0 vector, 0,06 (-0,31 to 0,43) in J45 vector, -0,16 (-0,66 to 0,33) in K1, -0,23 (-0,79 to 0,33) in K2 values before induction of cycloplegia.

CONCLUSION

The refractive and keratometry results of the Nidek OPD Scan II system and Topcon KR 8900 standard table-top autorefractokeratometer are not interchangeable in healthy adult population before and after induction of cycloplegia.

The Most Cited Articles and Authors in Refractive Surgery

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive analysis of the most highly cited articles and authors in refractive surgery.

METHODS

The Scopus database was searched for articles pertaining to refractive surgery using multiple search terms to identify the top 100 most cited articles in refractive surgery. A publicly available database of more than 100,000 scientists that provides standardized information on multiple variables resulting in a composite indicator (C score) was searched to identify refractive surgery authors. A refractive surgery-specific composite score was created using only the authors' publications that were directly related to refractive surgery.

RESULTS

The 100 most cited articles and 40 refractive surgery authors with the highest ranked C score were identified. The article with the most citations by Trokel et al has garnered nearly 800 citations to date. All articles included in the top 100 had 200 or more citations. The peak publication years were 1998 to 2001. Laser in situ keratomileusis (22), photorefractive keratectomy (18), and postoperative corneal ectasia and/or corneal biomechanics (16) were the most represented topics. Emory University generated the most articles (7) and the majority of publications (48%) originated in the United States. Steven E. Wilson, MD, had the highest refractive C score and Jorge L. Alió, MD, PhD, had the most refractive surgery articles and citations. Among all authors listed, the average number of refractive surgery publications was 97, with 35% of the group having more than 100 refractive surgery articles published. All authors on the list had more than 2,000 citations for their refractive surgery articles, whereas 38% had 4,000 or more citations.

CONCLUSIONS

This list provides a comprehensive assessment of the most cited articles and authors in refractive surgery and demonstrates key focuses and trends in the field over time. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(2):78-88.].

[Changes in the wavefront and peripheral defocus profile after excimer laser and orthokeratology corneal reshaping in myopia]

PURPOSE

This study compares the trends of changes in corneal asphericity, corneal and total aberrations and peripheral refraction in myopic eyes after excimer laser and orthokeratology correction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Aberrometry (OPD-Scan III; Nidek, Japan) was performed in 63 patients (126 eyes) with moderate and high myopia before and after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Femto-LASIK; 88 eyes, group 1) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK; 38 eyes, group 2). Peripheral refraction (Grand Seiko AutoRef/Keratometer) at 15° and 30° from the center of the fovea was observed in 12 patients of group 1 and in 18 patients with a background of orthokeratology correction (group 3).

RESULTS

Corneal asphericity factor Q transitioned to positive values after PRK and Femto-LASIK. Corneal aberrations: root mean square higher order aberration (RMS HOA) increased in both groups, Tilt 1 increased in group 1 and became negative in group 2, Tilt 2 increased in group 2 and went negative in group 1. Trefoil 6 did not change in group 1 and decreased in group 2. Coma 7 and 8 increased synchronously in both groups. Spherical aberrations (SA) increased in group 1, and went negative in group 2. Total aberrations changed to a lower degree, and these changes were not synchronous with the corneal ones; RMS HOA decreased in group 1 (while corneal RMS increased significantly), and in the PRK group it increased, but much less than the corneal. Total SA increased in group 1 and did not change in group 2. Peripheral myopic defocus formed in all cases, after Femto-LASIK the maximum was in the zone of 30º, after orthokeratology lenses - in the zone of 15º.

CONCLUSION

Using excimer laser and orthokeratology to reshape the cornea in full accordance with its different profiles have different effects on the wavefront and peripheral refraction of the eye. The internal optics of the eye partially compensates corneal aberrations induced by the excimer laser.

Comparison of Anterior Corneal Aberrometry, Keratometry and Pupil Size with Scheimpflug Tomography and Ray Tracing Aberrometer

This study aimed to assess the anterior corneal wavefront aberrations, keratometry, astigmatism vectors and pupil size between Pentacam HR® (Oculus Optikgeraete GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and iTrace® (Tracey Technologies Corp., Houston, TX, USA). In this observational study, 100 eyes (50 healthy volunteers) were scanned in mesopic light condition with a Pentacam HR® and iTrace®. Anterior corneal aberrations (spherical aberration (Z40), vertical coma (Z3 − 1), horizontal coma (Z3 + 1)), keratometry in the flattest (K1) and steepest meridian (K2), mean astigmatism, astigmatic vectors (J0 and J45), and pupil size were measured. We found a significant difference in Z40 (Pentacam®: +0.30 ± 0.11 µm and iTrace®: −0.03 µm ± 0.05 µm; p < 0.01) with no correlation between the devices (r = −0.12, p = 0.22). The devices were in complete agreement for Z3 − 1 (p = 0.78) and Z3 + 1 (p = 0.39), with significant correlation between the machines (r = −0.38, p < 0.01 and r = −0.6, p < 0.01). There was no difference in K1, K2 and mean astigmatism. J0 was negative with both devices (against-the-rule astigmatism), but there was no correlation. J45 was negative with the Pentacam HR® (more myopic oblique astigmatism) but significantly correlated between the devices. Pupil size was smaller with Pentacam HR® (p < 0.01). In summary, these devices cannot be used interchangeably. Corneal Z40 was significantly different with more negative Z40 with iTrace® compared to Pentacam HR®. iTrace® operates with lower illumination, giving larger pupil size than Pentacam HR®, which uses intense blue light during measurement. No correlation was found for J0. Pentacam HR® had a trend to record more negative J45 (myopic oblique astigmatism).

Optical inspection of single vision soft contact lenses based on an active adaptive wavefront sensor

We present an experimental configuration for optical inspection of single vision soft contact lenses based on an active adaptive wavefront sensor. At first, the soft lenses were immersed in a saline filled wet cell to prevent surface deformation during measurements. Thereafter, refractive powers and aberrations were accurately measured before and after correcting illumination laser beam aberrations and wet cell-induced aberrations. The results reveal that there is a significant difference between the measured aberrations and refractive powers before and after aberration compensation. Accordingly, the proposed system is recommended as an optical inspection tool for precise assessment of commercially available contact lenses.

Wave front aberrations induced from biomechanical effects after customized myopic laser refractive surgery in finite element model

PURPOSE

A customized myopic refractive surgery was simulated by establishing a finite element model of the human eye, after which we studied the wave front aberrations induced by biomechanical effects and ablation profile after wave front-guided LASIK surgery.

METHODS

Thirty myopia patients (i.e., 60 eyes) without other eye diseases were selected. Their ages, preoperative spherical equivalent, astigmatism, and wave front aberration were then obtained, in addition to the mean spherical equivalent error range - 4 to - 8D. Afterward, wave front-guided customized LASIK surgery was simulated by establishing a finite element eye model, followed by the analysis of the wave front aberrations induced by the surface displacement from corneal biomechanical effects, as well as customized ablation profile. Finally, the preoperative and induced aberrations were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Comatic aberrations were the main wave front abnormality induced by biomechanical effects, and the wave front aberrations induced by the ablation profile mainly included coma and secondary coma, as well as sphere and secondary-sphere aberrations. Overall, the total high-order aberrations (tHOAs), total coma (C₃₁), and sphere ([Formula: see text]) increased after wave front-guided customized LASIK surgery. According to our correlation analyses, coma, sphere, and tHOAs were significantly correlated with decentration. Additionally, the material parameters of ocular tissue were found to affect the postoperative wave front aberrations. When the material parameters of the sclera remained constant but those of cornea increased, the induced wave front aberrations were reduced.

CONCLUSION

All biomechanical effects of cornea and ablation profile had significant effects on postoperative wave front aberrations after customized LASIK refractive surgery; however, the effects of the ablation profile were more notorious. Additionally, the characteristics of biomechanical materials have influence on the clinical correction effect.

Recent advances in measurement of monochromatic aberrations of human eyes

The field of aberrations of the human eye is moving rapidly, being driven by the desire to monitor and optimise vision following refractive surgery. It is important for ophthalmologists and optometrists to have an understanding of the magnitude of various aberrations and how these are likely to be affected by refractive surgery and other corrections. In this paper, I consider methods used to measure aberrations, the magnitude of aberrations in general populations and how these are affected by various factors (for example, age, refractive error, accommodation and refractive surgery) and how aberrations and their correction affect spatial visual performance.

Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor optical dynamic range

The widely used lenslet-bound definition of the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) dynamic range is based on the permanent association between groups of pixels and individual lenslets. Here, we formalize an alternative definition that we term optical dynamic range, based on avoiding the overlap of lenslet images. The comparison of both definitions for Zernike polynomials up to the third order plus spherical aberration shows that the optical dynamic range is larger by a factor proportional to the number of lenslets across the SHWS pupil. Finally, a pre-centroiding algorithm to facilitate lenslet image location in the presence of defocus and astigmatism is proposed. This approach, based on the SHWS image periodicity, is demonstrated using optometric lenses that translate lenslet images outside the projected lenslet boundaries.

Multi-layer Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing in the point source regime

The Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS) is often operated under the assumption that the sensed light can be described by a single wavefront. In biological tissues and other multi-layered samples, secondary wavefronts from axially and/or transversely displaced regions can lead to artifactual aberrations. Here, we evaluate these artifactual aberrations in a simulated ophthalmic SHWS by modeling the beacons that would be generated by a two-layer retina in human and mouse eyes. Then, we propose formulae for calculating a minimum SHWS centroid integration area to mitigate these aberrations by an order of magnitude, potentially benefiting SHWS-based metrology and adaptive optics systems such as those used for retinal imaging and microscopy.

Average gradient of Zernike polynomials over polygons

Wavefront estimation from slope sensor data is often achieved by fitting measured slopes with Zernike polynomial derivatives averaged over the sampling subapertures. Here we discuss how the calculation of these average derivatives can be reduced to one-dimensional integrals of the Zernike polynomials, rather than their derivatives, along the perimeter of each subaperture. We then use this result to derive closed-form expressions for the average Zernike polynomial derivatives over polygonal areas, only requiring evaluation of polynomials at the polygon vertices. Finally, these expressions are applied to simulated Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors with 7 and 23 fully illuminated lenslets across a circular pupil, with their accuracy and calculation time compared against commonly used integration methods.

Influence of corneal spherical aberration on prediction error of the Haigis-L formula

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between corneal asphericity and Haigis-L formula prediction errors in routine cataract surgery after refractive surgery for myopic correction. This retrospective study included 102 patients (102 eyes) with a history of previous PRK or LASIK and cataract surgery. Axial length, anterior chamber depth, and central corneal power were measured using the optical biometer. On the anterior corneal surface, Q-value, spherical aberration, and ecentricity at 6.0 and 8.0 mm were measured using a rotating Scheimpflug camera. The postoperative refractive outcome at 6 months, mean error, and mean absolute error were determined. Correlation tests were performed to determine the associations between pre-cataract surgery data and the prediction error. The Q-values for 6.0 and 8.0 mm corneal diameter were 1.57 ± 0.70 (range: 0.03~3.44), and 0.82 ± 0.5 (range: -0.10~-2.66). The spherical aberration for 6.0 and 8.0 mm diameter was 1.16 ± 0.39 µm (range: 0.24~2.08 µm), and 3.69 ± 0.87 µm (range: 0.91~5.91 µm). eccentricity for 6.0 and 8.0 mm diameter was -1.22 ± 0.31 (range: -1.85 to -0.17), and -0.82 ± 0.39 (range: -1.63 to 0.32). The spherical aberration for 8.0 mm cornea diameter showed the highest correlations with the predicion error (r = 0.750; p < 0.001). When the modified Haigis-L formula considering spherical aberration for 8.0 mm produced smaller values in standard deviation of mean error (0.45D versus 0.68D), mean absolute error (0.35D versus 0.55D), and median absolute error (0.31D versus 0.51D) than the Haigis formula. Corneal asphericity influences the predictive accuracy of the Haigis-L formula. The accuracy was enhanced by taking into consideration the corneal spherical aberration for the 8.0 mm zone at pre-cataract surgery state.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes, including visual acuity, refractive errors, and aberrations, between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in eyes with myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Yonsei University College of Medicine and Eyereum Eye Clinic, Seoul, South Korea.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative case series.

METHODS

Patients with myopic astigmatism were treated with aberration-free transepithelial PRK or corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK using a 1050 Hz high-repetition excimer laser. The safety, efficacy, predictability, and corneal aberrations were compared preoperatively and 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The study comprised 188 patients (188 eyes); 91 eyes had aberration-free transepithelial PRK and 97 eyes corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK. Six month after surgery, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was comparable (-0.06 logMAR ± 0.07 [SD] aberration-free group; -0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR wavefront-guided group). The safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes were also comparable between groups. Corneal total root-mean-square (RMS) higher-order aberrations (HOAs) increased after treatment in both groups, although fewer RMS HOAs were induced in the corneal wavefront-guided group than in the aberration-free group. Spherical aberration increased similarly after treatment in both groups. However, coma and trefoil increased only in the aberration-free group.

CONCLUSIONS

Aberration-free transepithelial PRK and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK were safe and effective for correction of myopic astigmatism without difference in visual acuity and refractive outcomes. However, the corneal wavefront-guided profile induced fewer corneal aberrations than the aberration-free profile.

Accounting for focal shift in the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor

The Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor samples a beam of light using an array of lenslets, each of which creates an image onto a pixelated sensor. These images translate from their nominal position by a distance proportional to the average wavefront slope over the corresponding lenslet. This principle fails in partially and/or non-uniformly illuminated lenslets when the lenslet array is focused to maximize peak intensity, leading to image centroid bias. Here, we show that this bias is due to the low Fresnel number of the lenslets, which shifts the diffraction focus away from the geometrical focus. We then demonstrate how the geometrical focus can be empirically found by minimizing the bias in partially illuminated lenslets.

Centroid error due to non-uniform lenslet illumination in the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor

Images formed by individual Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor lenslets are displaced proportionally to the average wavefront slope over their aperture. This principle fails when the lenslet illumination is non-uniform. Here we demonstrate that the resulting error is proportional to the linear component of the illumination intensity, the quadratic wavefront component, and the lenslet size. For illustrative purposes, we compare the error due to centered Gaussian illumination decaying by 30% at the pupil edge against the error due to assuming the wavefront at the lenslet center being equal to the wavefront average across each lenslet. When testing up to ninth-order Zernike polynomial wavefronts and simulating nine lenslets across the pupil, the maximum centroid errors due to non-uniform illumination and sampling are 1.4% and 21%, respectively, and 0.5% and 6.7% when considering 25 lenslets across the pupil in the absence of other sources of error.

Comparative evaluation of visual outcomes and corneal asphericity after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with the six-dimension Amaris excimer laser system

Purpose

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery for correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism using a six-dimensional Amaris excimer laser.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 47 eyes of 28 patients (age: 19–36 years) with myopia or myopic astigmatism. We used the Custom Ablation Manager protocol and performed ablations with the SCHWIND AMARIS system. LASIK flaps were cut with an iFS Advanced Femtosecond Laser. Mean static (SCC) and dynamic cyclotorsion (DCC) were evaluated. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated during 6 months’ follow-up. Corneal asphericity (Q-value) was analyzed at 4 months postoperatively.

Results

The spherical equivalent (SE) reduction was statistically significant reduce 1 day after refractive surgery (P < 0.001), with no additional significant changes during follow-up (P = 0.854). SCC registration rates were 81% in the Aberration-Free mode (AF) and 90% in the Corneal Wavefront mode (CW). SCC measurements were within ± 5 degrees in 57% (AF) and 68% (CW) of eyes. Mean DCC was within ± 1 degree in 96% (AF) or 95% (CW) of cases. At 6 months, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/25 or better in all eyes. At last follow-up, both steep and flat keratometry values had significantly flattened in both groups (P < 0.001). Corneal asphericity also increased significantly during the postoperative period for an 8-mm corneal diameter (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

LASIK for myopia or myopic compound astigmatism correction using the six-dimensional AMARIS 750S excimer laser is safe, effective, and predictable. Postoperative corneal asphericity can be analyzed by linear regression to predict the changes in postoperative corneal asphericity with this approach.

Quality of Vision After Wavefront-Guided or Wavefront-Optimized LASIK: A Prospective Randomized Contralateral Eye Study

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK using different laser platforms on subjective quality of vision.

METHODS

The dominant eyes of 55 participants with myopia were randomized to receive either wavefront-guided LASIK treatment by the VISX Star S4 IR Custom-Vue excimer laser system (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) or wavefront-optimized treatment by the WaveLight Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser system (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), whereas the fellow eye had the alternate laser treatment. Patients completed a questionnaire assessing quality of vision and visual symptoms (daytime and nighttime glare, daytime and nighttime clarity, halos, haze, fluctuating vision, and double vision) preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12.

RESULTS

At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, there was no significant difference in any individual symptom between the wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized groups, although at 12 months wavefront-guided eyes trended toward having more excellent vision (wavefront-guided vs wavefront-optimized; 2.26 vs 2.43; P = .039). In the subgroup of patients with preoperative root mean square (RMS) higher order aberrations (HOAs) less than 0.3 µm in both eyes, the wavefront-optimized group demonstrated a trend toward worsened nighttime clarity (P = .009), daytime clarity (P = .015), and fluctuating vision (P = .046), and less excellent vision (P = .009) at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve months after surgery, most patients' self-reported visual symptoms were similar in eyes receiving wavefront-guided or wavefront-optimized LASIK. In general, 36% of patients preferred wavefront-guided LASIK, 19% preferred wavefront-optimized LASIK, and 45% had no preference at 12 months. The wavefront-guided preference was more pronounced in patients with lower baseline HOAs (RMS < 0.3 µm).

The effect of ptosis on cataract surgical planning

PURPOSE

To describe a patient complaining of 'ghosting' and 'shadowing' after bilateral, sequential cataract extraction with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation who was found to have significant eyelid ptosis.

METHODS

The following is a case report.

RESULTS

The patient's complaints arose a few weeks after surgery. By the second postoperative month, the patient's keratometry had changed compared to preoperative measurements. Because of significant ptosis, the patient underwent upper eyelid surgery. Four months later, he was found to have less corneal astigmatism than had been measured prior to cataract surgery. Following 2 stable examinations, a Prevue lens based on Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometry was made for each eye, which the patient said significantly improved his quality of vision. Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed 6 months after cataract surgery. One year after PRK, the patient's symptoms had disappeared, his uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/15 in the left, and he was satisfied with his quality of vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral toric IOLs were implanted in this patient based on measurements of corneal astigmatism that changed after cataract surgery and changed further after ptosis repair. This case demonstrates the importance of evaluating eyelid position in cataract surgical planning as ptosis can contribute significantly to corneal astigmatism. Patient education is important in the setting of higher expectations from purchase of premium lens implants.

Refractive outcomes of an advanced aspherically optimized profile for myopia corrections by LASIK: a retrospective comparison with the standard aspherically optimized profile

Purpose

A retrospective comparison of refractive outcomes of a new, aspherically optimized profile with an enhanced energy correction feature (Triple-A) and the conventionally used aspherically optimized profile (ASA, or aberration smart ablation) for correction of low-to-high myopia.

Setting

Augen-OP-Centrum, Cologne, Germany

Design

Retrospective nonrandomized comparative study

Methods

A central database at the Augen-OP-Centrum was used to gather retrospective data for low-to-high myopia (up to −10 D). One hundred and seven eyes (56 patients) were treated with the ASA profile, and 79 eyes (46 patients) were treated with the Triple-A profile. Postoperative outcomes were evaluated at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year follow-up time points.

Results

The Triple-A profile showed better predictability indicated by a significantly lower standard deviation of residuals (0.32–0.34 vs 0.36–0.44, Triple-A vs ASA) in the 6-month to 1-year period. The Triple-A group had better stability across all time intervals and achieved better postoperative astigmatism improvements with significantly lower scatter. This group achieved better safety at 1 year, with 100% of eyes showing no change or gain in Snellen lines, compared with 97% in the ASA group. A better safety index was observed for the Triple-A group at later time points. The Triple-A group had a better efficacy index and a higher percentage of eyes with an uncorrected Snellen visual acuity of 20/20 or greater at all investigated follow-up time points.

Conclusion

The new aspherically optimized Triple-A profile can safely and effectively correct low-to-high myopia. It has demonstrated superiority over the ASA profile in most refractive outcomes.

Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results

PURPOSE

To compare laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) outcomes between 2 wavefront-guided excimer laser systems in the treatment of myopia.

SETTING

University eye clinic, Palo Alto, California, USA.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative case series.

METHODS

One eye of patients was treated with the Allegretto Wave Eye-Q system (small-spot scanning laser) and the fellow eye with the Visx Star Customvue S4 IR system (variable-spot scanning laser). Evaluations included measurement of uncorrected visual acuity, corrected visual acuity, and wavefront aberrometry.

RESULTS

One hundred eyes (50 patients) were treated. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -3.89 diopters (D) ± 1.67 (SD) and -4.18 ± 1.73 D in the small-spot scanning laser group and variable-spot scanning laser group, respectively. There were no significant differences in preoperative higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between the groups. Twelve months postoperatively, all eyes in the small-spot scanning laser group and 92% in the variable-spot scanning laser group were within ±0.50 D of the intended correction (P = .04). At that time, the small-spot scanning laser group had significantly less spherical aberration (0.12 versus 0.15) (P = .04) and significantly less mean total higher-order root mean square (0.33 μm versus 0.40 μm) (P = .01). Subjectively, patients reported that the clarity of night and day vision was significantly better in the eye treated with the small-spot scanning laser.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictability and self-reported clarity of vision of wavefront-guided LASIK were better with the small-spot scanning laser. Eyes treated with the small-spot scanning laser had significantly fewer HOAs.

Wavefront-guided versus non-wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Purpose

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised, and data was extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using meta-analytical methods. Comparisons between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations were made as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean differences and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

Results

The study covered five trials involving 298 eyes. After wavefront-guided PRK, the pooled OR of achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.53–2.60; p = 0.69), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ±0.50 diopter of the intended target (predictability) was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.40–1.84; p = 0.70). No study reported a loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality. In eyes with wavefront-guided PRK, the postoperative trefoil aberrations (mean difference −0.02; 95% CI, −0.03 to −0.00; p = 0.03) were significantly lower. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative total HOAs (mean difference −0.04; 95% CI, −0.23 to 0.14; p = 0.63), spherical (mean difference 0.00; 95% CI, −0.08 to 0.09; p = 0.93), and coma (mean difference −0.06; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.03; p = 0.20) aberrations.

Conclusions

According to the meta-analysis, wavefront-guided PRK offered no advantage in efficacy, predictability, or safety measures over non-wavefront-guided PRK, although it may have induced fewer trefoil aberrations.

Wavefront-guided and aspheric ablation for myopia -- one-year results of the zyoptix personalized treatment advanced algorithm

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcome and change in higher-order aberrations (HOAs) 1 year post simultaneous wavefront-guided and aspheric photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Consecutive myopic patients undergoing PRK (38 eyes of 23 patients) and LASIK (42 eyes of 25 patients) using the Technolas 217z100 excimer laser (Technolas Perfect Vision) in a private laser clinic were included. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction (MRSE), HOAs, and spherical aberration (Z(4)(0)).

RESULTS

At 1 year, 87% (32/37) of PRK eyes and 81% (30/37) of LASIK eyes had UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = .75). Mean ± SD MRSE was -0.26 ± 0.31 diopters (D) in the PRK and -0.16 ± 0.34 D in the LASIK group (P = .222). There was no significant increase in total HOA root mean square (RMS) in the PRK group. Mean ± SD total HOA RMS increased from 0.402 ± 0.14 μm to 0.496 ± 0.17 μm (P = .013) in the LASIK group at 1 year. Z(4)(0) increased from mean ± SD -0.045 ± 0.12 μm to -0.109 ± 0.15 μm (P = .006, factor 2.42) in the PRK group and did not significantly increase in the LASIK group (mean ± SD -0.16 ± 0.17 μm to -0.17 ± 0.15 μm (P = .469, factor 1.08) at 6 mm pupil.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual outcome was excellent in both treatment groups. HOAs were still increased following LASIK by a factor of 1.23 but not PRK. Z(4)(0) was not induced by LASIK with the treatment algorithm but was negatively induced in PRK eyes.

Anterior corneal optical irregularity measured by higher-order aberrations induced by a broad beam excimer laser

BACKGROUND

The aim was to analyse anterior corneal optical irregularity in patients receiving photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a conventional broad beam laser.

METHODS

Pre- and post-operative anterior corneal aberrations including Zernike coefficients and root mean squares of higher-order aberrations were measured and derived with a Placido-ring-based corneal topographer and wavefront software, respectively, from 768 right eyes of patients receiving either PRK or LASIK for myopia with a conventional broad beam excimer laser in National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Multiple linear regression models selected by Mallows' Cp criteria were used to evaluate predictability of surgically induced aberrations and relevant factors.

RESULTS

Mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was -7.37 ± 2.33 D (range: -16.5 to -1.95). Root mean squares of higher-order aberrations and variances of Zernike coefficients all increased significantly after surgery (p < 0.01). All post-operative higher-order aberrations increased with the amount of attempted myopic correction and secondary astigmatism increased with attempted cylindrical correction. LASIK surgery induced less coma and third-order aberrations but more fifth- and sixth-order aberrations than PRK, although squared partial correlation coefficients were low. Larger optic and transitional zones meant fewer higher-order aberrations after surgery. Younger patients tended to have more surgically induced aberrations in the 3.0 mm pupil zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior corneal optical irregularity increased tremendously after refractive surgery by conventional broad beam lasers and correlated with greater attempted myopic correction, younger age and a smaller treatment zone. The effect of corneal flaps on post-operative corneal irregularity differed trivially.

Method for expressing clinical and statistical significance of ocular and corneal wave front error aberrations

PURPOSE

The significance of ocular or corneal aberrations may be subject to misinterpretation whenever eyes with different pupil sizes or the application of different Zernike expansion orders are compared. A method is shown that uses simple mathematical interpolation techniques based on normal data to rapidly determine the clinical significance of aberrations, without concern for pupil and expansion order.

METHODS

Corneal topography maps (TOMEY, Inc, Nagoya, Japan) from 30 normal corneas were collected, and the corneal wave front error was analyzed by Zernike polynomial decomposition into specific aberration types for pupil diameters of 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm and Zernike expansion orders of 6, 8, 10, and 12. Using this 4 × 4 matrix of pupil sizes and fitting orders, the best-fitting 3-dimensional functions were determined for the mean and standard deviation of the root-mean-square error for specific aberrations. The functions were encoded into a software application to determine the significance of data acquired from nonnormal cases.

RESULTS

The best-fitting functions for 6 types of aberrations were determined: defocus, astigmatism, prism, coma, spherical aberration, and all higher-order aberrations. A clinical screening method of color coding the significance of aberrations in normal, postoperative laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconus cases having different pupil sizes and different expansion orders is demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

A method to calibrate wave front aberrometry devices using a standard sample of normal cases was devised. This method could be potentially useful in clinical studies involving patients with uncontrolled pupil sizes or in studies that compare data from aberrometers that use different Zernike fitting-order algorithms.

Wavefront-guided versus cross-cylinder photorefractive keratectomy in moderate-to-high astigmatism: a cohort of two consecutive clinical trials

Background

Although there have been many studies of the efficacy and safety of wavefront- guided (WF) and cross-cylinder photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), there are few studies on moderate-to-high astigmatism cases. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of WF and cross-cylinder PRK in moderate-to-high astigmatism.

Methods

In a comparative cohort, the results of two before-and-after clinical trials conducted on moderate-to-high astigmatism were studied. In the first trial, 50 eyes of 25 patients with stable refraction were enrolled in a before-and-after clinical trial to undergo WF PRK using the VISX™ (VISX Inc, Santa Clara, CA) system. The second clinical trial enrolled 48 eyes of 24 patients with stable refraction and moderate-to-high astigmatism to undergo PRK by the cross-cylinder method using a NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser system (NIDEK Co Ltd, Gamagori, Japan).

Results

After 6 months, 80% of the eyes in the WF group had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better compared to 40% in the cross-cylinder group. Only one eye in the cross-cylinder group and no eyes in the WF group lost more than one line of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 6 months of treatment. No treated eyes in either group lost more than two lines of BCVA. The percentage of eyes with no change in BCVA was 54% and 58.3% in the WF and cross-cylinder groups, respectively. Mean postoperative absolute changes in total root-mean-square higher order aberrations in the WF group and cross-cylinder group were 0.05 ± 0.22 μm and 0.17 ± 0.20 μm, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Both methods of PRK, using the NIDEK EC-5000 and VISX excimer laser systems, are effective for correcting moderate-to-high astigmatism. The WF approach appeared more successful in improving the refractive results.

Custom vs conventional PRK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of postoperative visual function

PURPOSE

To determine whether VISX S4 (VISX Inc) custom photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) results in better visual outcomes than VISX S4 conventional PRK.

METHODS

Photorefractive keratectomy was performed on 80 eyes from 40 patients in this randomized, prospective, contralateral eye study. Dominant eyes were randomized to one group with the fellow eye receiving the alternate treatment. Primary outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, and root-mean-square (RMS) higher order aberrations.

RESULTS

Mean UDVA was -0.023±0.099 (20/19) in the custom group and -0.044±0.080 (20/18) in the conventional group 6 months after surgery (P=.293). Mean CDVA was -0.073±0.067 (20/17) in the custom group and -0.079±0.071 (20/17) in the conventional group 6 months after surgery (P=.659). Total higher order aberration RMS and spherical aberration increased in both groups compared to preoperative values (P<.05). Coma increased in the conventional group (P<.05) whereas it was similar to preoperative values in the custom group. No significant differences were noted in induction of trefoil.

CONCLUSIONS

Custom and conventional PRK were shown to be safe and effective with excellent visual acuity and contrast sensitivity performance at 6 and 12 months. Conventional PRK induced more coma than custom PRK; however, this did not seem to correlate with clinical outcomes.

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, contralateral eye comparison of myopic LASIK with optimized aspheric or prolate ablations

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative outcomes of aspheric or prolate LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

In this double-blind, bilateral, randomized trial, 40 patients (80 eyes) with -0.75 to -7.00 diopters (D) of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) underwent optimized aspheric treatment zone ablation (OATz group) in 1 eye and optimized prolate ablation (OPA group) in the fellow eye. Six-month postoperative outcomes were compared for MRSE and visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, patient satisfaction, ocular higher order aberrations (HOAs), and spherical aberration. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and paired t test were used for testing differences between groups. P<.05 was statistically significant. Main outcome measures included HOAs, spherical aberration, visual and refractive outcomes, and contrast sensitivity.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, 36 patients (72 eyes) were evaluated. The MRSE was -0.07±0.23 D for the OPA group and +0.02±0.24 D for the OATz group (P>.05). Two (5%) eyes in the OPA group and 1 (3%) eye in the OATz group (P=.114) lost 1 line of corrected distance visual acuity. Postoperative visual acuity was not statistically different between groups (P>.05). Statistically lower change was noted in spherical aberration (0.011 μm) in the OPA group versus the OATz group (0.099 μm) (P<.001). Statistically higher induction of coma was noted in the OPA group (P=.035). No statistically significant differences were noted in photopic, mesopic, or glare contrast sensitivity and patient satisfaction between groups (P>.05, for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The refractive and visual outcomes of OPA and OATz were equivalent. However, the postoperative optical quality of OPA-treated eyes was better.

Validity of scaling zernike coefficients to a larger diameter for refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the validity of a Zernike rescaling algorithm to a larger wavefront diameter.

METHODS

Using 4256 preoperative wavefront examinations, the variability of inter-examination wavefront root-mean-square (RMS) was compared to the error induced due to scaling Zernike coefficients to a larger diameter. The validity of scaling Zernike coefficients was set when the error due to the scaling was the same as the variability of the inter-examination wavefronts. The inter-examination variability was calculated from eyes having at least 3 same-day, preoperative examinations over the same diameters. Error from scaling Zernike coefficients to a larger diameter was calculated by comparing the wavefront for a (scaled-up) set of Zernike coefficients to the wavefront of the average of Zernike coefficient sets at a larger diameter for the same eye. Wavefront diameters of 5, 5.5, 6, 6.5, and 7 mm were considered.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found for the variability for different pupil sizes. The error due to scaling Zernike coefficients to a larger pupil size was generally smaller than the inter-examination variability when the new diameter was 0.25 mm larger than the original diameter. The error was comparable to the inter-examination variability when the new diameter was 0.5 mm larger. The error became larger when the new diameter was >0.75 mm larger than the original diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Rescaling Zernike coefficients from a smaller diameter to a larger one has practical applications in optical zone extension for wavefront-guided refractive surgery.

Three-month clinical outcomes with static and dynamic cyclotorsion correction using the SCHWIND AMARIS

PURPOSE

To evaluate intraoperative static and dynamic cyclotorsions and postoperative outcomes on astigmatism and high-order aberration in astigmatic or aberrated eyes that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis treatments with advanced cyclotorsion control using the SCHWIND AMARIS.

METHODS

Fifty eyes (30 for aberration neutral and 20 for corneal wavefront) were treated. Treatments were planned with Custom Ablation Manager and ablations were performed using the SCHWIND AMARIS. Laser in situ keratomileusis flaps were cut with an LDV femtosecond laser. Cyclotorsional movements were evaluated for static cyclotorsion component (SCC) for mean and repeatability, and for dynamic cyclotorsion component (DCC) for mean and amplitude. Clinical outcomes were evaluated for predictability, refractive outcome, safety, and wavefront aberration.

RESULTS

Registration rates were 90% for SCC and 98% for DCC. SCC was within ± 5 degrees in 64% of cases. Repeatability of SCC was ± 1 degree in 88% of cases. Mean DCC was within ± 1 degree in 98% of cases, partly compensating for SCC. DCC amplitude was within ± 2 degrees in 84% of cases. At 3-month follow-up, 88% of eyes were within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of astigmatism. Mean defocus was -0.06 ± 0.24 D and astigmatism was 0.27 ± 0.20 D. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved in 42% of eyes versus 2% losing 1 line. In corneal wavefront-customized treatments, coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and root mean square high-order magnitudes at 6-mm analysis diameter were reduced by -0.04, -0.13, -0.04, and -0.10 μm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser in situ keratomileusis with advanced cyclotorsion compensation using the SCHWIND AMARIS is safe and predictable and yields superior visual outcomes. Refractions and high-order aberrations were reduced to subclinical values without applying additional nomograms, showing the excellent performance of the system.

Efficacy, predictability, and safety of wavefront-guided refractive laser treatment: metaanalysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy, predictability, safety, and induced higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations.

SETTING

Division of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Metaanalysis.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMED, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trails. Trials meeting the selection criteria were quality appraised and data extracted by 2 independent authors. Measures of association were pooled quantitatively using metaanalytical methods. Comparison between wavefront-guided and non-wavefront-guided ablations was measured as pooled odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences. The pooled ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for efficacy, safety, and predictability. The weighted mean difference and 95% CIs were used to compare induced HOAs.

RESULTS

Eight trials involving 955 eyes were included. After wavefront-guided LASIK, the pooled OR of achieving uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 (efficacy) was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.66-1.83; P=.72), the pooled OR of achieving a result within ± 0.50 diopter of intended target (predictability) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.60-1.75; P=.92), and the weighted mean difference in induced HOAs was -0.09 (95% CI, -0.17 to -0.01; P=.04). No study reported loss of 2 or more lines of Snellen acuity (safety) with either modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Metaanalysis showed no clear evidence of a benefit of wavefront-guided over non-wavefront-guided ablations. However, there was a lack of standardized reporting of UDVA better than 20/20, which might mask an advantage in wavefront-guided treatment. With high preexisting HOAs, wavefront-guided has advantages over non-wavefront-guided treatment.

Temporal evolution of ocular aberrations following laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To study the temporal evolution of ocular aberrations after standard LASIK to correct myopia.

METHODS

The ocular, corneal and internal aberrations for a 6-mm pupil were measured in 22 young myopic eyes (n = 12 subjects; range -2.0 to-7.6 D) before and during a 9-month follow-up after standard myopic LASIK. Ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor, while corneal aberrations were estimated from the elevation data obtained by corneal topography. For every patient and condition the eye's modulation transfer function (MTF) and Strehl ratio (SR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared to preoperative results, we found that standard myopic LASIK produced a significant increase of ocular high-order aberrations at 1 month after surgery. During the next 8 months, we found a small increase of ocular and corneal positive spherical aberration (SA), although with a large inter-subject variability. However, all eyes treated for myopia higher than -5 D showed a significant increase of positive SA during the first 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard myopic LASIK decreases ocular optical quality. For most subjects, the increase in aberrations induced by the surgery was stable during the next 9 months after LASIK. However, further changes of the ocular SA after myopic LASIK are possible in patients treated for higher amounts of myopia. The changes in aberrations mainly appeared between the first and the sixth month after surgery, which suggests the need to wait at least 6 months after myopic LASIK before comparing outcomes, especially for patients treated for higher myopias.

Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of wavefront-optimized ablation and topography-guided ablation in fellow eyes of patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 84 patients who underwent LASIK in both eyes: wavefront-optimized ablation in one eye (group I) and topography-guided ablation in the fellow eye (group II). The Moria2 microkeratome with a 110 single-use head (Moria, Antony, France) was used to create a superior hinged flap and the Allegretto Wave Excimer Laser (Alcon/Wavelight Light Laser Technologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany) for photoablation. The Allegretto wave analyzer was used to measure the ocular aberrations before and 6 months after LASIK. Refractive visual outcomes and ocular aberration changes were compared between the two treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Six months postoperatively, the mean uncorrected visual acuity of group II was statistically better than that of group I (P = .02). Seventy percent of group I and 83% of group II achieved a postoperative spherical equivalent refraction of ±0.5 diopters. The postoperative total root-mean-square of higher order aberrations (HOAs) of group II was smaller than that of group I, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .51). There was a decrease in most of the individual terms of HOAs in group II, but it was only statistically significant in Z(3) (-1) (P = .04). The reverse occurred in group I, where most of the individual terms of HOAs increased, but it was not statistically significant. Significant improvement was only noted in Z(5) (3) (P = .05) and Z(5) (5) (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Both wavefront-optimized ablation and topography-guided ablation provided good refractive results, but the latter induced fewer HOAs.

Comparison of age-related changes between corneal and ocular aberration in young and mid-age myopic patients

AIM

To study the dynamic character of aberration between the cornea and the ocular with aging, and to evaluate the symmetry of the aberrations between right and left eye in order to supply the data for clinic to do the refractive surgery reasonably.

METHODS

This is a comparative case series study. 82 normal cases (164 eyes) including 37 females (74 eyes) and 45 males (90 eyes) were recruited through the routine examinations, Topolyzer and wavefront analysis. The average age was 25.9±5.0 years old (range 18 to 49 years old), and the mean spherical equivalent (SE) is -3.82±2.21D (range -1.00 to -6.00D). The changes of aberrations regarding age, the relationship between anterior corneal and total aberrations were analyzed, as well as the symmetry between right and left eyes by using Zernike terms.

RESULTS

The Z(3) (1), RMS3 of corneal aberrations, Z(3) (1), Z(4) (0) , RMS3 and RMS4 of ocular aberrations had a positive correlation with age. The zernike terms both in corneal and whole eye were significantly correlated between right and left eyes.

CONCLUSION

The corneal horizontal coma, ocular horizontal coma and ocular spherical aberrations become to increase at the age of more than 40 years old. The dynamic change of aberration with aging, balance between corneal and ocular, and the symmetric character between left eye and right eye should be designed carefully in the treatment nomogram before the refractive surgery.

Correlation among ocular spherical aberration, corneal spherical aberration, and corneal asphericity before and after LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the SCHWIND AMARIS platform

PURPOSE

To determine the spherical wave aberration of the human eye based on corneal topography.

METHODS

Based on the pre- and postoperative status of 146 consecutive eyes (median patient age 36 years), the correlations between spherical aberration and asphericity and between corneal and ocular spherical aberrations were determined using simple linear regression methods. The asphericity (Q) values for which spherical aberration equals zero as well as the reference Q values for which corneal spherical aberration equals ocular spherical aberration have been determined. Patients underwent LASIK using the AMARIS excimer laser platform (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions). All ablations were based on aspheric aberration-neutral profiles.

RESULTS

Corneal and ocular spherical aberrations correlate well with Q value and the value p · R(-3) in patients before and after LASIK for myopic astigmatism. A Q value of -0.19 to -0.27 can provide zero ocular spherical aberration in patients before and after LASIK for myopic astigmatism. Ocular spherical aberration is induced at a rate of half the induced corneal spherical aberration. A reference Q value of -0.12 to +0.01 can provide corneal spherical aberration equal to ocular spherical aberration in patients before and after LASIK for myopic astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular and corneal wave aberrations are two different concepts that are not interchangeable. As for spherical aberration, a simple static model with a reference cornea deviating from a Cartesian oval can provide a 2:1 correspondence between corneal and ocular spherical aberration.

Six-month clinical outcomes of customized treatments minimized for depth and time in laser corneal refractive surgery

PURPOSE

Evaluating the application of 2 methods for minimizing the ablated tissue upon objective minimization of depth and time of Zernike-based customized ablations.

SETTING

Muscat Eye Laser Center, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.

METHODS

Recently developed algorithms for selection of Zernike terms in customized treatments for refractive surgery were used. Clinical outcomes and tissue-saving attributes were evaluated on 2 groups [minimize depth (MD) and minimize volume (MV); 30 eyes each], plus a control group [corneal wavefront (CW); 30 eyes] with conventional customized approach. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in terms of predictability, safety, and contrast sensitivity and tissue-saving attributes in terms of saved depth and time for each condition (in micrometers, seconds, and percentage) and whether minimized depth or time were less than required for equivalent noncustomized treatments.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent of treatments in the CW group, 93% in the MD group, and 100% in the MV group were within 0.50 diopters of spherical equivalent (SEq) postoperatively. Forty percent of treatments in the CW group, 34% in the MD group, and 47% in the MV group gained at least 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity postoperatively. Tissue-saving attributes showed an average saved depth of 8 μm (1-20 μm) and a saved time of 6 seconds (1-15 seconds) in the MD group and 6 μm (0-20 μm) and 8 seconds (2-26 seconds) in the MV group. Proposed corrections were always less deep and shorter than full wavefront corrections. In 43% of the MD cases, corrections were less deep, and in 40% of the MV cases, corrections were shorter than equivalent aberration-free treatments.

CONCLUSION

The minimization techniques compared here effectively reduced depth and time needed for ablation (up to a maximum of 50% and by 15% in average) without negatively affecting clinical outcomes postoperatively, yielding results equivalent to those of the full customization group.

Conventional versus custom ablation in photorefractive keratectomy: randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare visual outcomes and changes in total higher-order aberrations (HOAs) between conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and custom PRK SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Labbafinejad Medical Center, Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Negah Eye Center, Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

This clinical trial comprised eyes having bilateral myopic PRK with the Technolas 217z excimer machine. One eye had conventional ablation (conventional group) and the other eye, wavefront-guided custom treatment (custom group). Changes in postoperative visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, contrast sensitivity function, and root mean square higher-order aberrations (RMS HOAs) were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 28 patients (56 eyes) was 26.7 years. The mean preoperative cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error was -4.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.6 (SD) and the mean refractive astigmatism, 0.91 +/- 1.0 D. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in preoperative cycloplegic refractive error, HOAs, or contrast sensitivity function. The mean follow-up was 8.1 +/- 3.3 months. The increase in RMS HOAs from preoperatively to postoperatively was statistically significantly higher in the custom group in the 6.0 mm zone (P = .03) but not in the 4.0 mm zone (P = .26). The decrease in low mesopic contrast sensitivity function was statistically significant in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The RMS HOAs significantly increased after PRK with both methods. The results suggest that custom ablation is more sensitive to optical zone (OZ) size and may yield more aberrations with an OZ smaller than 6.0 mm.