1998 European Cataract Outcome Study: report from the European Cataract Outcome Study Group

Rate of Posterior Capsule Rupture in Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery by Residents with Institution of a Wet Laboratory Course

Purpose To determine if a structured surgical wet laboratory curriculum for ophthalmology residents reduced the rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Setting James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Methods The study assessed resident-performed phacoemulsification cataract cases from 2011 to 2017, after the creation of a wet laboratory course. Primary outcome measure was PCR. If present, timing of complication, dropped lens fragments, and the need for anterior vitrectomies were noted. Self-reported rates of PCR prior to institution of a wet laboratory course (2010–2011) were compared with cases done by residents who completed the course (2011–2017).

Results A total of 3,445 cases were reviewed of which 2.44% (84 cases) noted PCR. Of these, 19% (16) had dropped lens fragments, and 60.7% (51) required anterior vitrectomy. Sixty-nine cases documented timing of PCR with the majority, 58%, occurring during phacoemulsification. When comparing rates of PCR in cases done prior to the presence of a wet laboratory course versus after, there was a significant reduction observed (5.20% before vs. 2.44% after).

Conclusion In the presence of a wet laboratory curriculum, the rate of PCR decreased dramatically. The average rate was lower than those reported at other training programs (2.6–9.9%). Most PCR occurred during phacoemulsification, suggesting need for further focused instruction in this step.

Changing practice patterns in European cataract surgery as reflected in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2008 to 2017

PURPOSE

To study practice patterns in European cataract surgery over a 10-year period.

SETTING

European clinics affiliated to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO).

DESIGN

Registry cohort study.

METHODS

The EUREQUO contains preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters reported by surgeons in many European clinics. All data reported to the registry are anonymized. Preoperative parameters included age, sex, visual acuity, target refraction, ocular comorbidity, and surgical difficulties. Surgical data included anesthesia, surgical technique, intraocular lens optic biomaterial, and complications. Postoperative parameters included visual acuity, refraction, and short-term complications.

RESULTS

During the study period (January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017), a total of 2 714 108 cataract extractions were reported to the EUREQUO. Preoperative data changed over time, with decreases in mean age (74.5-73.0 years), proportion of women from 60.6% (100 373/165 628) to 57.2% (174 908/305 845), and proportion of coexisting eye diseases from 30.0% (49 638/165 650) to 27.0% (82 704/305 846) and with improvements in preoperative visual acuity (mean logarithm of minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] 0.46 to 0.37). The use of topical anesthesia increased over time from 28.1% (26 238/93 320) to 71.7% (130 525/182 083). Surgical complications showed a significant decrease from 2.5% (4107/165 650) to 1.2% (3573/305 846). The visual outcome improved over time (mean logMAR 0.08 to 0.05), as did the absolute median prediction error (0.38 diopter [D] to 0.28 D).

CONCLUSIONS

Trends in European cataract surgery practice patterns from 2008 to 2017 have moved toward younger patients with better preoperative visual acuity, fewer surgical complications, and better predicted refractions and visual outcomes.

Comparison of vitreous loss rates between manual phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the vitreous loss complication rate of manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery with that of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

SETTING

Mercy Eye Specialists, Springfield, Missouri, USA.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-center case series.

METHODS

Cataract surgeries from 2010 to 2014 performed by 4 surgeons were audited for rates of vitreous loss. Vitreous loss data were statistically analyzed with and without exclusions.

RESULTS

Of the total 7155 cases from 2010 to 2014, 3784 were consecutively performed using manual phacoemulsification from 2010 to 2012 and 3371 were performed using femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery from 2013 to 2014. The rate of vitreous loss with exclusions was 1.17% in the manual phacoemulsification group and versus 0.65% femtosecond laser-assisted group; without exclusions, the rate was 1.40% versus 0.77%. In absolute terms, the rate decreased for every surgeon in the study. The chi-square test showed a statistically significant association between the date of surgery, and thus technique, and vitrectomy cases (P < .05). Odds ratio analysis with exclusions versus without exclusions indicated that surgeries performed from 2010 to 2012 using manual phacoemulsification were 1.6 times and 1.8 times, respectively, more likely to have vitreous loss than surgeries performed from 2013 to 2014 using the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from manual phacoemulsification to femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery resulted in a statistically significant decrease in vitreous loss. Because vitreous loss increases the risk for other serious complications of cataract surgery, this new finding has important implications for the safety of cataract surgery.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Proprietary or commercial disclosures are listed after the references.

Budget impact model of Mydrane®, a new intracameral injectable used for intra-operative mydriasis, from a UK hospital perspective

BACKGROUND

During cataract surgery, maintaining an adequate degree of mydriasis throughout the entire operation is critical to allow for visualisation of the capsulorhexis and the crystalline lens. Good anaesthesia is also essential for safe intraocular surgery. Mydrane® is a new injectable intracameral solution containing two mydriatics (tropicamide 0.02% and phenylephrine 0.31%) and one anaesthetic (lidocaine 1%) that was developed as an alternative to the conventional topical pre-operative mydriatics used in cataract surgery. This study aimed to estimate the budget impact across a one year time frame using Mydrane® instead of topical dilating eye drops, for a UK hospital performing 3,000 cataract operations a year.

METHODS

A budget impact model (BIM) was developed to compare the economic outcomes associated with the use of Mydrane® versus topical drops (tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10%) in patients undergoing cataract surgery in a UK hospital. The outcomes of interest included costs and resource use (e.g. clinician time, mydriasis failures, operating room time, number of patients per vial of therapy etc.) associated with management of mydriasis in patients undergoing cataract surgery. All model inputs considered the UK hospital perspective without social or geographical variables. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were also performed to assess the model uncertainty.

RESULTS

Introduction of Mydrane® is associated with a cost saving of £6,251 over 3,000 cataract surgeries in one year. The acquisition costs of the Mydrane® (£18,000 by year vs. £3,330 for eye drops) were balanced by substantial reductions in mainly nurses' costs and time, plus a smaller contribution from savings in surgeons' costs (£20,511) and lower costs associated with auxiliary dilation (£410 due to avoidance of additional dilation methods). Results of the sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model to the variation of inputs. Except for the duration of one session of eye drop instillation and the cost of Mydrane®, Mydrane® achieved an incremental cost gain compared to tropicamide/phenylephrine eye drops.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher acquisition cost of Mydrane®, the budget impact of Mydrane® on hospital budgets is neutral. Mydrane® offers a promising alternative to traditional regimes using eye drops, allowing for a better patient flow and optimisation of the surgery schedule with neutral budget impact.

Deterministic Effects to the Lens of the Eye Following Ionizing Radiation Exposure: is There Evidence to Support a Reduction in Threshold Dose?

Ionizing radiation exposure to the lens of the eye is a known cause of cataractogenesis. Historically, it was believed that the acute threshold dose for cataract formation was 5 Sv, and annual dose limits to the lens were set at 150 mSv. Recently, however, the International Commission on Radiological Protection has reduced their threshold dose estimate for deterministic effects to 0.5 Gy and is now recommending an occupational limit of 20 mSv per year on average. A number of organizations have questioned whether this new threshold and dose limit are justified based on the limited reliable data concerning radiation-induced cataracts. This review summarizes all of the published human epidemiological data on ionizing radiation exposure to the lens of the eye in order to evaluate the proposed threshold. Data from a variety of exposure cohorts are reviewed, including atomic bomb survivors, Chernobyl liquidators, medical workers, and radiotherapy patients. Overall, there is not conclusive evidence that the threshold dose for cataract formation should be reduced to 0.5 Gy. Many of the studies reviewed here are challenging to incorporate into an overall risk model due to inconsistencies with dosimetry, sample size, and scoring metrics. Additionally, risk levels in the studied cohorts may not relate to occupational scenarios due to differences in dose rate, radiation quality, age at exposure and latency period. New studies should be designed specifically focused on occupational exposures, with reliable dosimetry and grading methods for lens opacities, to determine an appropriate level for dose threshold and exposure limit.

Posterior capsular rent: Prevention and management

This review article deals with a potentially sight threatening complication – rupture of the posterior capsule – during cataract surgery. Cataract surgery is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in ophthalmology and despite tremendous technical and technological advancements, posterior capsular rent (PCR) still occurs. PCR occurs both in the hands of experienced senior surgeons and the neophyte surgeons, although with a higher frequency in the latter group. Additionally, certain types of cataracts are prone to this development. If managed properly in a timely manner the eventual outcome may be no different from that of an uncomplicated case. However, improper management may lead to serious complications with a higher incidence of permanent visual disability. The article covers the management of posterior capsular rent from two perspectives: 1. Identifying patients at higher risk and measures to manage such patients by surgical discipline, and 2. Intraoperative management of posterior capsular rent and various case scenarios to minimize long-term complications. This review is written for experienced and not-so-experienced eye surgeons alike to understand and manage PCR.

Indication for cataract surgery. Do we have evidence of who will benefit from surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

The need for cataract surgery is expected to rise dramatically in the future due to the increasing proportion of elderly citizens and increasing demands for optimum visual function. The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based recommendation for the indication of cataract surgery based on which group of patients are most likely to benefit from surgery. A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases. Studies evaluating the outcome after cataract surgery according to preoperative visual acuity and visual complaints were included in a meta-analysis. We identified eight observational studies comparing outcome after cataract surgery in patients with poor (<20/40) and fair (>20/40) preoperative visual acuity. We could not find any studies that compared outcome after cataract surgery in patients with few or many preoperative visual complaints. A meta-analysis showed that the outcome of cataract surgery, evaluated as objective and subjective visual improvement, was independent on preoperative visual acuity. There is a lack of scientific evidence to guide the clinician in deciding which patients are most likely to benefit from surgery. To overcome this shortage of evidence, many systems have been developed internationally to prioritize patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery, but the Swedish NIKE (Nationell Indikationsmodell för Katarakt Ekstraktion) is the only system where an association to the preoperative scoring of a patient has been related to outcome of cataract surgery. We advise that clinicians are inspired by the NIKE system when they decide which patients to operate to ensure that surgery is only offered to patients who are expected to benefit from cataract surgery.

[Clinical practice variation in cataract surgery]

PURPOSE

Cataract surgery rates have dramatically increased in the last two decades. However, clinical practice variation in cataract surgery has not been thoroughly studied. The aim of this review is to analyze clinical practice variation, including the causes and consequences of this phenomenon. Then, its role in health care planning and health care quality is focused, emphasizing the importance of reducing it and providing several practical strategies to accomplish it.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest researches are presented in this article. They identify the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines as the best tool to standardize care processes.

CONCLUSION

Managing unwarranted or unwanted variation would improve quality of care and may lead to a significant saving in health care spending.

The Malaysian Cataract Surgery Registry: Cataract Surgery Practice Pattern

PURPOSE

To present the cataract surgery practice pattern among the ophthalmic surgeons in hospitals managed by the Ministry of Health (MOH) in Malaysia.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis on Malaysian Cataract Surgery Registry (CSR).

METHODS

The Malaysian CSR collected data on cataract surgeries done at all the ophthalmology departments in MOH from year 2002 to 2004 (paper-based) and 2007 to 2011 (web-based). Data collected include type of admission, surgical techniques, type of anesthesia, and intraocular lens (IOL). Descriptive and inferential analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 185,388 cataract surgeries done over 8 years, 171,482 (91.5%) were captured in CSR. There was a steep rise in phacoemulsification cataract surgery from 39.7% in 2002 to 78.0% in 2011 with a corresponding fall in extracapsular cataract extraction from 54.0% to 17.3% in the respective years. This explained the surge in the use of foldable IOL from 26.5% in 2002 to 88.3% in 2011. The proportion of cataract surgery with IOL implantation was 97.5% in 2012 and 98.2% in 2011. The proportion of day-care cataract surgery was low, with 39.3% in 2002 to 52.3% in 2011. Vitreoretinal surgery was the commonest type of combined surgery performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although phacoemulsification was performed in two thirds of the patients who presented to MOH hospitals in Malaysia, extracapsular cataract extraction was still being performed because of a significant proportion of cataract that were brunescent and limited access to phacoemulsification machines and consumables. There is a need to increase day-care cataract surgery as it will eventually save cost.

Uptake, Barriers and Outcomes in the Follow-up of Patients Referred for Free-of-Cost Cataract Surgery in the Sao Paulo Eye Study

PURPOSE

To determine uptake, barriers and outcomes in the follow-up of patients referred for free-of-charge, expedited cataract surgery in the Sao Paulo Eye Study (SPES).

METHODS

SPES was a population-based study of urban, low-middle income residents aged ≥50 years. Presenting visual acuity (PVA), best-corrected visual acuity, refraction, and slit-lamp examination were performed in 3677 participants. For subjects with cataract as a principal cause of best-corrected visual acuity ≤20/40, surgery was offered free of charge. Two years after the baseline study, surgery uptake, barriers to surgery, and visual outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 210 (5.71%) participants who had a cataract surgery indication at baseline, 164 (78.1%) were successfully contacted and 55 (33.5%) reported being operated on for cataract, with 51 agreeing to be re-examined. In a multiple logistic regression model, age, sex, schooling, previous cataract surgery, and PVA at baseline were not significantly associated with surgery uptake. Co-existing health conditions (20.4%), fear of surgery (12.2%) and fear of losing eyesight (11.6%) were the most frequent barriers to cataract surgery adherence. Among the 69 eyes operated on in the interval between baseline and follow-up, PVA ≥20/63 was observed in 50 (72.6%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 62.2-82.3%), PVA <20/63-20/200 in 11 (15.8%, 95% CI 8.9-22.9%) and PVA <20/200 in 8 (11.6%, 95% CI 5.3-17.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Quality of surgery is an increasing determinant of uptake rates. Although free-of-charge and expedited cataract surgery was offered, surgical outcomes might have influenced the low uptake. Aside from cataract surgery campaigns, improvement of surgeon skills, accurate biometry, treatment of ocular comorbidities, postoperative follow-up and eye-care education are needed.

The changing pattern of cataract surgery indications: a 5-year study of 2 cataract surgery databases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to describe changes over time in the indications and outcomes of cataract surgery and to discuss optimal timing for the surgery.

DESIGN

Database study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who had undergone cataract extraction in the Netherlands, Sweden, or Malaysia from 2008 through 2012.

METHODS

We analyzed preoperative, surgical, and postoperative data from 2 databases: the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) and the Malaysian National Cataract Registry. The EUREQUO contains complete data from the national cataract registries in the Netherlands and Sweden.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity, preoperative ocular comorbidity in the surgery eye, and capsule complications during surgery.

RESULTS

There were substantial differences in indication for surgery between the 3 national data sets. The percentage of eyes with a preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 or worse varied from 7.1% to 72%. In all 3 data sets, the visual thresholds for cataract surgery decreased over time by 6% to 28% of the baseline values. The frequency of capsule complications varied between the 3 data sets, from 1.1% to 3.7% in 2008 and from 0.6% to 2.7% in 2012. An increasing postoperative visual acuity was also seen for all 3 data sets. A high frequency of capsule complication was related significantly to poor preoperative visual acuity, and a high frequency of decreased visual acuity after surgery was related significantly to excellent preoperative visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year trend in all 3 national data sets showed decreasing visual thresholds for surgery, decreasing surgical complication rates, and increasing visual outcomes regardless of the initial preoperative visual level. Cataract surgery on eyes with poor preoperative visual acuity was related to surgical complications, and cataract surgery on eyes with excellent preoperative visual acuity was related to adverse visual results.

Visual outcome after cataract surgery at the university college hospital, ibadan

Aim:

The aim of this study was to determine the visual outcome of patients who had cataract surgery in the University College Hospital Ibadan.

Methodology:

This is an observational descriptive, longitudinal study of consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery at the University College Hospital conducted between May and October 2007. A total of 184 patients who presented to the hospital and met the inclusion criteria were recruited into the study. Patients were examined preoperatively, 1st day postoperatively and 8th week postoperatively.

Results:

The mean age was 66.5 years; and the male to female ratio was 1.2:1. Preoperatively, 137 patients (74.5%) were blind in the operated eye, while 39 patients (23.6%) were blind in both eyes at presentation. At 1st day postoperatively, 87 patients (47.3%) had pinhole visual acuity of 6/6-6/18. Best corrected vision after refraction eight weeks postoperatively showed that 127 patients out of 161 patients (78.8%) had good vision while 28 patients (17.4%) had borderline vision, and six patients (3.8%) had severe visual impairment after refraction. The number of bilaterally blind patients also reduced from 39 (23.6%) to one (0.6%). Uncorrected refractive error was the commonest cause of poor vision prior to refraction. Glaucoma was the commonest ocular co-morbidity accounting for poor vision in 9.1% of patients eight weeks after cataract surgery.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrates that good results can be obtained with cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation in the developing world. More attention should be directed towards ensuring that successful outcomes are indeed being realized by continued monitoring of postoperative visual outcomes and prompt refraction for all patients.

A methodological approach to identify external factors for indicator-based risk adjustment illustrated by a cataract surgery register

BACKGROUND

Risk adjustment is crucial for comparison of outcome in medical care. Knowledge of the external factors that impact measured outcome but that cannot be influenced by the physician is a prerequisite for this adjustment. To date, a universal and reproducible method for identification of the relevant external factors has not been published. The selection of external factors in current quality assurance programmes is mainly based on expert opinion. We propose and demonstrate a methodology for identification of external factors requiring risk adjustment of outcome indicators and we apply it to a cataract surgery register.

METHODS

Defined test criteria to determine the relevance for risk adjustment are "clinical relevance" and "statistical significance". Clinical relevance of the association is presumed when observed success rates of the indicator in the presence and absence of the external factor exceed a pre-specified range of 10%. Statistical significance of the association between the external factor and outcome indicators is assessed by univariate stratification and multivariate logistic regression adjustment.The cataract surgery register was set up as part of a German multi-centre register trial for out-patient cataract surgery in three high-volume surgical sites. A total of 14,924 patient follow-ups have been documented since 2005. Eight external factors potentially relevant for risk adjustment were related to the outcome indicators "refractive accuracy" and "visual rehabilitation" 2-5 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The clinical relevance criterion confirmed 2 ("refractive accuracy") and 5 ("visual rehabilitation") external factors. The significance criterion was verified in two ways. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed almost identical external factors: 4 were related to "refractive accuracy" and 7 (6) to "visual rehabilitation". Two ("refractive accuracy") and 5 ("visual rehabilitation") factors conformed to both criteria and were therefore relevant for risk adjustment.

CONCLUSION

In a practical application, the proposed method to identify relevant external factors for risk adjustment for comparison of outcome in healthcare proved to be feasible and comprehensive. The method can also be adapted to other quality assurance programmes. However, the cut-off score for clinical relevance needs to be individually assessed when applying the proposed method to other indications or indicators.

European registry for quality improvement in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

A project aimed at creating a multi-national database for cataract and refractive surgery was initiated in 2008. The database was intended for learning and clinical improvement, not supervision. The project was co-funded by the European Union, under the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) and supported by 11 national societies for cataract and refractive surgery. The purpose of this article is to describe the setup of the database and the ensuing achievements within cataract surgery after four years.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

A web-based system was created for input and output of data, with a software interface to two databases, one for cataract surgery and one for refractive surgery. Data can be put in either manually through web forms or by transfer of data from existing national registries or large electronic medical record systems. Output of reports from the system or export of one's own data is available on the web. The data are anonymous to all users, with the sole exception that reporting surgeons and clinics have access to their own data. The system does not include any patient identification.

FINDINGS

After four years, data from 16 countries have been entered into the system, including reports of more than 900,000 cataract extractions. The database has been used by individual clinics for benchmarking and clinical improvement work, and has also served as the basis for new clinical guidelines for cataract surgery. The ESCRS has guaranteed the sustainability of the database after the project period.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

A European quality registry with data input from surgeons and clinics in 16 European countries has been established. Close to one million surgeries have been entered into the system during the first four years. Evidence-based guidelines have been published based on data in the registry. The system is used for benchmarking by both experienced surgeons and trainees.

[Potentials and limitations of the planned compulsory quality assurance program for cataract surgery (Qesü)]

Cataract surgery is scheduled for a federal program for quality improvement across the different sectors of care (outpatient care and hospitals). In case of implementation not only ophthalmic surgeons but all ophthalmologists would have to contribute to the documentation. Urgency, potential benefits and limitations of a compulsory compared to a voluntary quality assessment system are analyzed.

Intracameral anesthesia for cataract surgery: a population-based study on patient satisfaction and outcome

Purpose

To evaluate if the standard anesthetic regimen – topical combined with intracameral anesthesia without sedation – in a population-based cohort of unselected cataract surgery cases is adequate, optimal, and good practice, or if improvements are necessary.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, observational study on all cases of cataract surgery during a 1-year period at one institution (n=1249). Data were collected from the patients’ records. Outcome measures were use of preoperative sedation, type of anesthesia, complications, and adverse events. In a subgroup of patients (n=124) satisfaction with the anesthetic regimen was evaluated using a short questionnaire.

Results

Most cases (90%, 1125/1249) had combined topical and intracameral anesthesia without sedation. Patients who chose preoperative sedation (midazolam hydrochloride sublingually) were significantly younger and more often female (P=0.0001 and P=0.011, respectively). In the questionnaire subgroup, the median pain score after surgery was 0.7 (visual analog scale, 0–10). A pain score of 1.9 or less was reported by 76% of the patients. Patients reporting a pain score of 2 or more had sedation and additional anesthetics more often. No significant difference was found regarding age, sex, pulse rate, oxygen saturation, first or second eye surgery, or adverse intraoperative events for patients with pain scores of 1.9 or less and 2 or more.

Conclusion

This large population-based series of small-incision phacoemulsification surgery shows that combined topical and intracameral anesthesia without sedatives is well tolerated for most phacoemulsification patients. It is also effective in cases when complications or adverse events occur. It is important to be responsive to the individual patient’s needs and adjust operating procedures if necessary, as there were a few patients who experienced insufficient anesthesia.

Refractive error after cataract surgery combined with descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To assess refractive error after cataract surgery combined with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using adjusted keratometric (K) readings to calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power.

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

One eye of 39 consecutive patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and cataract were included. To calculate IOL power before surgery, the Javal steep and flat K readings (Haag-Streeit) were adjusted by reducing their value by -1.19 diopters (D); the axial length was measured by immersion biometry, and the standard A-constant was used. Surgery included phacoemulsification, IOL (Acrysof SN60AT; Alcon) implantation within the capsular bag, and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using posterior lamella prepared with a 300-μm head microkeratome (Moria). The absolute prediction error (absolute difference between predicted and achieved refraction) was assessed 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean power of the implanted IOL was 23.22 ± 2.90 D. The mean predicted and achieved refractions were -0.27 ± 0.26 D and -0.23 ± 0.73 D, respectively. The mean absolute prediction error was 0.59 ± 0.42 D (range, 0.05 to -1.52 D). The postoperative spherical equivalent fell within ±0.50 D, ±1.00 D, and ±2.00 D of the predicted refraction in 55.5%, 83.3%, and 100% of cases, respectively. Had the IOL power been calculated without adjusting the K readings, the mean absolute prediction error would have been significantly higher (0.86 ± 0.62 D; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, in which posterior lamellae were prepared using a 300-μm head microkeratome, adjusting preoperative K readings by -1.19 D led to accurate IOL power calculation and highly predictable refractive error after cataract surgery combined with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

A retrospective study of the indications and outcomes of capsular tension ring insertion during cataract surgery at a tertiary teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to determine preoperative indications, intraoperative procedures, and outcomes of capsular tension ring (CTR) insertion during cataract surgery.

METHODS

A review of all patients undergoing cataract surgery with insertion of a CTR between July 2000 and June 2010 was conducted at The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, a large tertiary teaching hospital in Victoria, Australia. Information relating to each patient's demographic details, preoperative assessment, surgical procedure, and postoperative assessment were obtained.

RESULTS

Eighty-four eyes of 82 patients were included in this study. The main indications for CTR insertion were previous trauma, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, and mature cataracts. Twenty-one eyes (25.0%) did not have any obvious preoperative indication. A posterior capsule tear was the most common intraoperative complication (3.6%). An intraocular lens was successfully implanted in the bag in 72 eyes (85.7%). Postoperatively, the most common complications were a decentered intraocular lens (8.3%) and persistent corneal edema (6.0%). Overall, 61 eyes (72.6%) had better postoperative visual acuity compared with preoperative acuity, with 67 patients (79.8%) achieving vision of 20/40 or better.

CONCLUSION

For the majority of cases, CTR use in complex cataract surgeries is associated with improved postoperative outcomes. CTR implantation is most commonly required in patients with known risk factors for zonular instability.

Toward zero effective phacoemulsification time using femtosecond laser pretreatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare effective phacoemulsification time after femtosecond laser pretreatment with conventional phacoemulsification and the associated effect on visual outcomes and endothelial cell loss.

DESIGN

Prospective, consecutive, single-surgeon case-control study.

CONTROLS

Controls underwent phacoemulsification cataract extraction plus insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL). Cases underwent pretreatment with the femtosecond laser followed by phacoemulsification cataract extraction and IOL insertion.

METHODS

Two hundred one eyes underwent cataract surgery between April 2012 and July 2012. Data collected included patient demographics, preoperative characteristics, femtosecond lens fragmentation method, effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), intraoperative complications, and postoperative outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Effective phacoemulsification time, intraoperative complications, corneal endothelial cell loss, as well as postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and refractive outcomes.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were similar between groups. There was no difference between baseline cataract grades (2.59 ± 0.71 vs. 2.52 ± 0.72, not significant). One hundred percent of cases pretreated with the femtosecond laser had complete capsulotomy. Mean EPT was reduced by 83.6% in the femtosecond pretreatment group (P<0.0001) when compared with controls, with 30% having 0 EPT (P<0.0001). Effective phacoemulsification time was reduced 28.6% within the femtosecond group using improved lens fragmentation algorithms, and a further 72.8% reduction was achieved with a 20-gauge phacoemulsification tip. Overall, there was a 96.2% reduction in EPT between controls and the optimized femtosecond pretreatment group. This was associated with a 36.1% reduction in endothelial cell loss in the femtosecond group. Visual and refractive outcomes were similar to those of conventional cataract surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Femtosecond laser pretreatment results in a significant reduction in effective phacoemulsification time, including the possibility of 0 EPT. Further reductions may be achieved using optimization of lens fragmentation patterns and surgical technique.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Sutureless large incision cataract extraction: Indications and results from two teaching hospital eye departments in the United Kingdom

Objective:

To highlight the role of Sutureless Large Incision Cataract Extraction (SLICE) in the United Kingdom for the treatment of cataracts at high risk for intra- or postoperative complications.

Setting:

Two University Hospitals in the United Kingdom

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective case note review of planned SLICE performed over a 12-month period.

Results:

SLICE was performed on 11 eyes of 11 patients (mean age, 79 years) having preoperative vision of hand motions (10 eyes) with very dense or mobile cataracts and high risk for phacoemulsification. Mean follow up was 12 weeks, with no operative or postoperative complications. Nine patients (without ocular or systemic comorbidity) achieved best corrected vision of 0.3 LogMAR (20/40) or better.

Conclusions:

SLICE is safe and effective for dense or mobile cataracts and can play a role in patients where conventional phacoemulsification carries higher risks of complications.

[Result-related success rates of cataract operations. Results of a systematic literature review]

This systematic literature review, including 7 publications released since 2000, provides references for outcome indicators of cataract surgery for quality management initiatives. The reported relative numbers of cases achieving visual rehabilitation and refractive accuracy were determined and compared. With one exception the success rates did not represent benchmarks defined as best possible outcome but describe the results of data collected in a population during routine clinical practice. A best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≥ 0.5 was achieved in 84-93% of all patients and in 95-99% of patients without preoperative visually impairing comorbidities. A refractive accuracy (absolute deviation of target refraction from spherical equivalent) of ≤ 1 D was reported in 72-97% of the patients. The success rates of these well established outcome indicator levels were high. Differences between operators were more distinguishable and the clinical relevance higher with less liberal indicator levels. A BCVA ≥ 1 was realized in 30-47% of all patients and in 52-62% of patients without visually impairing comorbidities. A total of 45-80% of the patients showed a refractive accuracy of ≤ 0.5 D. Exogenous factors not influencable by the surgeon have a relevant impact on the success rates. The literature review confirms the strong association of visually impairing comorbidities and BCVA outcome. Based on literature methodological problems of quality management systems for cataract surgery are discussed. While voluntary initiatives have the ability to solve these difficulties appropriate concepts for mandatory procedures are currently lacking.

Pseudo anterior capsule barrier for the management of posterior capsule rupture

A technique that uses an implanted intraocular lens (IOL) to create a barrier for the management of posterior capsule rupture is described. When a rupture occurs, surgery is halted and a dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) injected into the anterior chamber to prevent vitreous prolapse. The remaining nucleus is maneuvered into the anterior chamber away from the pupillary space. The posterior capsule tear is converted into a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis where possible. Dissociated anterior vitrectomy is performed as indicated, keeping the large nuclear fragments trapped in the OVD-filled anterior chamber. An IOL is implanted in the capsular bag or sulcus with optic capture through the anterior capsulorhexis. Using reduced parameters, phacoemulsification of the remaining fragments is completed over the IOL, which functions as a barrier to seal off the vitreous cavity. Residual nuclear fragments and vitreous are cleared from beneath the optic by placing the vitreous cutter under the optic, recapturing the optic before the instruments are removed from the eye.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Determination of valid benchmarks for outcome indicators in cataract surgery: a multicenter, prospective cohort trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a systematic approach to derive valid benchmarks for 2 outcome indicators intended to ascertain quality in cataract surgery and to propose benchmark levels drawn from the study results.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter cohort trial.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1685 patients (206-239 eyes per trial site) were recruited consecutively at 7 study sites. The patients featured age-related cataracts and were undergoing unilateral cataract surgery in the period between January 2007 and August 2008.

METHODS

Only patients with uncomplicated age-related cataracts were included. Cataract surgery was performed by phacoemulsification. The SN60AT (Alcon, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) intraocular lens (IOL) was used as a study lens. The IOL power was calculated using the SRK-T formula with a standardized A constant. Biometry was performed with the IOL Master (Carl Zeiss Meditex, Jena, Germany). Only highly experienced senior surgeons were involved.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome indicators 1 month and 3 months after surgery were the respective achievement of: (1) maximum absolute deviation of 0.5 diopter (D) between target refraction and postoperative spherical equivalent (primary end point, refractive accuracy); (2) best-corrected visual acuity of at least 0.8 (secondary end point, visual acuity outcome).

RESULTS

In the pooled data, maximum absolute deviation of ± 0.5 D from target refraction was achieved in 80% (95% confidence interval, 78%-82%) of cases. Visual acuity of 0.8 or more was reached in 87% (95% confidence interval, 80%-93%) of cases. The results from the trial centers differed significantly in the outcomes of the primary and secondary end points (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study quantified benchmark levels for 2 outcome indicators in a standardized cataract surgery procedure. External confounding factors such as the comorbidity of patients, which cannot be influenced by the surgeon, were excluded. The derived benchmarks selectively illustrate the quality of the surgery and are superior to success rates published in the literature from unspecific data collections. This method is more suited for improving outcome quality by benchmarking. General methodologic problems are discussed, leading to recommendations for future study designs.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Prospective multicenter trial assessing effectiveness, refractive predictability and safety of a new aberration free, bi-aspheric intraocular lens

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness and safety of the Softec HD IOL; and to present refractive outcomes for lenses manufactured at an IOL power tolerance of 0.11 D.

METHODS

Three-hundred and ninety adult patients requiring removal of a cataractous lens with implantation of a monofocal IOL in at least one eye were eligible for study participation across eight US investigative sites. Patients were enrolled unilaterally. After routine surgery, subjects were examined for adverse events (AEs), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and manifest refraction correction at 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and sixty-six (95%) of patients completed the 12-month postoperative visit. The percent of patients achieving best corrected Snellen acuity 20/40 or better was 98.9%, and 81.1% of patients achieved best corrected Snellen acuity 20/25 or better. Of those patients (80%) implanted with a lens available in 0.25 D increments (manufactured at a tolerance of 0.11 D) 40.9%, 69.8% and 93.8% of patients were within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D and ±1.0 D of predicted target refraction respectively. Overall incidence of cumulative and persistent IOL Grid AEs was 2.2% with no AE meeting or exceeding the FDA Grid of Historical Controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The Softec HD IOL is a safe and effective lens. The high manufacturing tolerance of the lens appears to enhance refractive outcomes.

Effect of hospital on variation in visual acuity and vision-specific quality of life after cataract surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the contribution of hospital-to-hospital variability in changes in clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes among patients undergoing cataract extraction by phacoemulsification.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of 14 public hospitals. We recruited consecutive patients on waiting lists for cataract extraction. Clinical data were collected prior to the intervention and 6 weeks afterward. Subjects completed the visual function index (VF-14) prior to the procedure and 3 months afterward. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for visual acuity and VF-14 scores.

RESULTS

Substantial differences were observed across the 14 hospitals. At baseline, mean visual acuity ranged from 0.16 to 0.34, and mean VF-14 scores ranged from 48.06 to 75.89. Following cataract extraction, the mean improvement in visual acuity ranged from 0.35 to 0.57 and in VF-14 scores from 10.94 to 41.70. The ranges were even more pronounced among patients with low visual acuity or low VF-14 scores prior to the intervention. Significant differences remained in multivariate analysis. Within the multivariate analysis, the variable 'hospitals' had an R(2) of 0.069 for the visual acuity model and of 0.073 for the VF-14 model, 20% and 13%, respectively, of the total variability explained. Variation was also observed within geographic regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of patients undergoing cataract extractions vary widely from hospital to hospital, even within the same geographic region, explaining an important part of the results. Quality improvement efforts should concentrate on patients with low pre-intervention visual acuity or vision-related disability to reduce this variability in outcomes.

Value of dual biometry in the detection and investigation of error in the preoperative prediction of refractive status following cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To report the value of dual biometry in the detection of biometry errors.

METHODS

Study 1: retrospective study of 224 consecutive cataract operations. The intraocular lens power calculation was based on immersion biometry. Study 2: immersion biometry was compared with optical coherence biometry (OCB) in terms of axial length, anterior chamber depth, keratometry readings and the recommended lens power to achieve emmetropia. Study 3: prospective study of 61 consecutive cataract operations. Both immersion and OCB were performed, but lens power calculation was based on the latter.

RESULTS

Study 1: 115 (86%), 101 (75.4%), 90 (67.2%) and 50 (37.3%) of postoperative spherical equivalents were within +/-1.5 dioptres (D), +/-1.25 D, +/-1 D and +/-0.5 D of the target, respectively. Study 2: excellent agreement between axial length readings, anterior chamber depth readings and keratometry readings by immersion biometry and OCB was observed (reflected in a mean bias of -0.065 mm, -0.048 mm and +0.1803 D, respectively, in association with OCB). Agreement between the lens power recommended by each technique to achieve emmetropia was poor (mean bias of +1.16 D in association with OCB), but improved following appropriate modification of lens constants in the Accutome A-scan software (mean bias with OCB = -0.4 D). Study 3: 37 (92.5%) and 23 (57.5%) of operated eyes achieved a postoperative refraction within +/-1 D and +/-0.5 D of target, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Systematic errors in biometry can exist, in the presence of acceptable postoperative refractive results. Dual biometry allows each biometric parameter to be scrutinized in isolation, and identify sources of error that may otherwise go undetected.

Cost and reimbursement of cataract surgery in Europe: a cross-country comparison

The number of cataract extractions has increased substantially over time. At present, cataract surgery is estimated to be the most common single procedure performed in the developed world. The present study compares the costs of a cataract intervention across nine European countries. To enhance comparability, data were collected using a common template based on a case vignette. Adequate data for analysis were collected from 41 providers and were used to evaluate variation across countries and providers. Ordinary least squares and a multilevel model were used to investigate cost variation. Mean total costs per cataract intervention varied considerably from country to country, ranging from 318 euros in Hungary to 1087 euros in Italy. Variations of a similar magnitude were detected for personnel costs and overheads. However, variations in the cost of the lens were more modest. Overall, our results confirm expectations about the causes of cost variations across EU member states, indicating that these variations may be attributable to the quantity of resources used in performing the operation, the price of resources, and the type of setting in which the operation is performed. The study highlights how accounting practices and available cost data differ across Europe. It also shows the feasibility of collecting data on the basis of vignettes using common cost templates. Studies following this approach will gain importance if cross-country comparisons are to be used to promote European benchmarking exercises.

Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Cataract Surgery in Patients Taking Tamsulosin (Flomax)

PURPOSE

Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) caused by systemic alpha-blockers has been associated with an increased risk of cataract surgical complications when the surgeon was unaware of the medication history and did not anticipate its occurrence. This study was undertaken to evaluate the surgical outcomes and rate of complications when the ophthalmologist knew the patient was taking tamsulosin (Flomax, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT) and used 1 of several strategies to manage IFIS.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter nonrandomized observational series.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 167 consecutive eyes in 135 patients taking tamsulosin and undergoing cataract surgery.

METHODS

Phacoemulsification was performed in conjunction with at least 1 of 4 different IFIS management strategies, namely, topical atropine preoperatively, iris retractors, pupil expansion ring, or use of viscoadaptive ophthalmic viscosurgical device with reduced fluidic parameters.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Severity of IFIS, incidence of operative or postoperative complications, and final visual acuity.

RESULTS

The IFIS severity was rated as mild in 17%, moderate in 30%, and severe in 43% of the study eyes. No IFIS was noted in 10% of the eyes. The rate of posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss was 0.6% (1/167; 95% confidence interval, 0%-1.8%). Ninety-five percent of eyes achieved a best-corrected visual acuity of at least 20/40.

CONCLUSION

When experienced surgeons could anticipate IFIS and employ compensatory surgical techniques, the complication rate from cataract surgery was low and the visual outcomes were excellent in eyes of patients with a history of tamsulosin use.

Vision related quality of life: A cataract study

Introduction. Since 1996, advanced methods and new instruments for the assessment of vision quality of life (VisQoL) index (37 and 15) have been developed and applied at the University Eye Clinic in Novi Sad. Many researches assume that postoperative results should not be evaluated only by postoperative visual acuity, but also by subjective perception of visual function and the patients ability to perform everyday activities, i.e. by quality of life. Therefore, our clinical results were based on both parameters of visual function, as the most objective attributes for assessing outcomes of certain types of cataract surgery. Material and Methods. Based on the results of the Cataract Study in Vojvodina in 2004, 5.7% of patients waiting for cataract surgery were already blind, 16.5% had low vision with cataract on both eyes, and 57% of patients had monocular blindness. Results and Discussion. With improvement of visual acuity to 0.5 or higher, after cataract surgery in 96.5% of patients, the cumulative VisQoL 15-index changed from 59.3 to 95.5. Intraocular lens implantation contributed most to the significant improvement in the vision related quality of life. Our study showed that pseudophakic patients had better quality of life than aphakic patients, who had the same visual acuity and refractive correction. Difficulties in performing everyday activities, such as shopping, using the telephone and reading, were found in 12.7% of aphakic, but only in 3% of pseudophakic patients. Conclusion. Advanced phacoemulsification techniques enable operated cataract patients immediate vision recovery, better quality of life, and personal satisfaction with visual function in everyday activities.

The Influence of Incision-Induced Astigmatism and Axial Lens Position on the Correction of Myopic Astigmatism with the Artisan Toric Phakic Intraocular Lens

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative astigmatism with regard to incision-induced astigmatism and deviation in axial alignment with the use of preoperative limbal marking with the Javal keratometer (Haag Streit, Bern, Switzerland) in eyes implanted with the Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens (IOL) (Ophtec, Groningen, The Netherlands).

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four eyes of 33 patients with myopia (mean, -9.67 diopters [D]) and astigmatism (mean, -3.44 D).

INTERVENTION

The enclavation site was marked on the limbus using the Javal keratometer. The Artisan toric phakic IOL was implanted according to the axis marked on the limbus. Follow-up was a minimum of 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety index, efficacy index, predictability, safety, and vector analysis of total refractive correction were determined. The effects of axis misalignment and incision-induced astigmatism on the final refractive error were evaluated.

RESULTS

At 6 months after surgery, the safety index was 1.29+/-0.29 and the efficacy index was 1.04+/-0.35. Mean spherical equivalent subjective refraction reduced from -11.39+/-4.86 D before surgery to -0.38+/-0.57 D at 6 months. Sixty-seven percent of eyes were within 0.50 D of attempted refraction and 89% were within 1.00 D. Mean preoperative cylinder was 2.92+/-1.60 D at 91.4 degrees . At 6 months, the mean cylinder was 0.28+/-0.54 D at 174.3 degrees . No eyes lost 2 or more lines of best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months. Eighty-three percent of eyes achieved uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 and 28% achieved 20/20. Vector analysis of total surgically induced astigmatism revealed a mean cylindrical change of 3.21+/-1.71 D. Average axis misalignment was 0.37+/-5.34 degrees . The mean incision-induced astigmatism was 0.74+/-0.61 D at 0.2 degrees .

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the myopic toric IOL leads to safe, efficacious, and predictable results. The level of unpredictability caused by minor axis IOL misalignment has minimal effects on the residual refractive error. The procedure of axis alignment with the Javal keratometer seems to be an accurate method of marking the eye for toric IOL implantation. Incision-induced astigmatism can result in an overcorrection of the cylinder. A systematic undercorrection of -0.50 D for attempted cylindrical outcome could result in an achieved correction closer to emmetropia.

Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting

PURPOSE

To assess how patients from a district general hospital population were affected on a short-term basis after posterior capsule (PC) rupture during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, United Kingdom.

METHODS

This retrospective audit encompassing a 2-year period evaluated the incidence of PC rupture and its outcomes. Details of the patients' age, preoperative and final postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ocular comorbidity, surgeon grade, number and duration of follow-up reviews, and postoperative complications were collected.

RESULTS

Over the 2-year period, the PC rupture rate was 1.7% (45 PC ruptures in 2727 phacoemulsification cataract procedures). Thirty-eight eyes (84.4%) achieved a final BCVA of 6/12 or better. In 39 eyes (86.7%), final BCVA improved compared with BCVA at presentation. Mean duration of follow-up was 11.7 weeks. The most common extra procedure was anterior vitrectomy (64.4%). The most common postoperative complication was raised intraocular pressure (IOP) (exceeding 30 mm Hg) on the first postoperative day (20.0%) despite additional acetazolamide as prophylaxis. None developed infective endophthalmitis. Apart from 1 retinal detachment (2.2%) at week 27, all complications resolved by 19 weeks. No patient required additional long-term medication at the final visit.

CONCLUSION

Posterior capsule rupture impacted on the patient in the short-term in terms of additional surgical procedures, additional topical and oral medications, and number and duration of follow-up reviews. Most patients recovered an acuity of 6/12 or better. However, it is important to be vigilant of postoperative complications, especially raised IOP on the first postoperative day.

Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification

Background

Consensus development techniques were used in the late 1980s to create explicit criteria for the appropriateness of cataract extraction. We developed a new appropriateness of indications tool for cataract following the RAND method. We tested the validity of our panel results.

Methods

Criteria were developed using a modified Delphi panel judgment process. A panel of 12 ophthalmologists was assembled. Ratings were analyzed regarding the level of agreement among panelists. We studied the influence of all variables on the final panel score using linear and logistic regression models. The explicit criteria developed were summarized by classification and regression tree analysis.

Results

Of the 765 indications evaluated by the main panel in the second round, 32.9% were found appropriate, 30.1% uncertain, and 37% inappropriate. Agreement was found in 53% of the indications and disagreement in 0.9%. Seven variables were considered to create the indications and divided into three groups: simple cataract, with diabetic retinopathy, or with other ocular pathologies. The preoperative visual acuity in the cataractous eye and visual function were the variables that best explained the panel scoring. The panel results were synthesized and presented in three decision trees. Misclassification error in the decision trees, as compared with the panel original criteria, was 5.3%.

Conclusion

The parameters tested showed acceptable validity for an evaluation tool. These results support the use of this indication algorithm as a screening tool for assessing the appropriateness of cataract extraction in field studies and for the development of practice guidelines.